Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
GIAMPAOLO GABBI
Financial Management Department, University of Siena
Banking and Finance Area, SDA Bocconi - Milan
gabbi@unisi.it
Many studies show that international correlations have changed through time.
This phenomenon changed many portfolio managers’ practices, which are now
strictly linked with sectors behaviours. In order to give reason for this
management style, we provide some new evidences for correlation dynamics
among geographic areas and business sectors.
Nevertheless some researches offer theoretical basis for semi-variance
optimisation, fewer authors analyse its contribution to asset allocation. Here we
apply the concept to compare whether it applies efficiently to sectors and
countries.
The paper is aimed at answering to the following questions:
1) is short-term correlation useful for tactical asset allocation?
2) is it possible to estimate less volatile indexes of correlation, so to ease the
forecasting process?
3) how to obtain a good coherence with frameworks incorporating downside
risk as measure of risk?
4) can portfolios outperform those allocated with the usual correlation index?
Conclusions are that:
1) short-term correlation, if adequately modelled, can be fundamental to
implement a successful tactical asset allocation;
2) correlations lower volatile thanks to the application of semi-correlation
measure;
3) neural networks applied to benchmark returns generate good results,
especially in terms of direction, which is, in fact, the necessary input for the
application of semi-correlation to the asset allocation process;
4) finally, gap ratios among returns and volatility grow for both the groups and
extreme values of the frontiers and the upward of risk/return ratio is still better
for geographical diversification, especially in the minimum values of expected
returns.
1. INTRODUCTION
Many studies show that international correlations have changed through
time1. During the last years, globalisation has accelerated the process of
towards increasing positive values.
1
Solnik-Bouorelle-Le Fur (1996); Groenen-Franses (2000).
1
This phenomenon changed many portfolio managers’ practices, which are
now strictly linked with sectors behaviours. In order to give reason for this
management style, we provide some new evidences for correlation dynamics
among geographic areas and business sectors.
Many studies offer theoretical basis for semi-variance optimisation2. Fewer
authors analyse the contribution of semi-correlation to asset allocation3. Here
we try to apply the concept to compare whether it applies more efficiently to
sectors or to countries.
The paper is aimed at answering to the following questions:
5) is short-term correlation useful for tactical asset allocation?
6) is it possible to estimate less volatile indexes of correlation, so to ease
the forecasting process?
7) how to obtain a good coherence with frameworks incorporating
downside risk as measure of risk [Bramante – Gabbi (2001)]?
8) can portfolios outperform those allocated with the usual correlation
index [Harlow – Rao (1989); Harlow (1991)]?
2
Harlow (1991).
3
Erb, Harvey, Viskanta (1994).
2
Table 1 – Morgan Stanley Indexes for Sectors and Countries
SECTORS COUNTRIES
ENERGY AUSTRALIA
MATERIALS AUSTRIA
CAPITAL GOODS BELGIUM
COMML SVC & SUPPL CANADA
TRANSPORTATION DENMARK
AUTO & COMPONENTS FINLAND
CONS DUR & APPAREL FRANCE
HOTELS REST & LEISURE GERMANY
MEDIA HONG KONG
RETAILING IRELAND
FOOD & DRUG RETL ITALY
FOOD BEV & TOBACCO JAPAN
HOUSE & PERS PROD NETHERLANDS
H CARE EQUIP & SVC NEW ZEALAND
PHARMA & BIOTECH NORWAY
BANKS PORTUGAL
DIVERS FINANCIAL SINGAPORE
INSURANCE SPAIN
REAL ESTATE SWEDEN
SOFTWARE & SERVICES SWITZERLAND
TECH HARD & EQUIPMENT UNITED KINGDOM
TELECOM SVC USA
UTILITIES WORLD
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0
0
1 10 19 28 37 46 55 64 73 82 91 100 109 118
1 10 19 28 37 46 55 64 73 82 91 100 109 118
-0.2
-0.2
-0.4
-0.4
ENERGY MATERIALS CAPITAL GOODS COMML SVC & SUPPL TRANSPORTATION AUTO & COMPONENTS
CONS DUR & APPAREL HOTELS REST & LEIS MEDIA
RETAILING FOOD & DRUG RETL FOOD BEV & TOBACCO
3
1 1
0.8 0.8
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0
1 10 19 28 37 46 55 64 73 82 91 100 109 118 0
1 10 19 28 37 46 55 64 73 82 91 100 109 118
-0.2
-0.2
-0.4
-0.4
HOUSE & PERS PROD H CARE EQUIP & SVC PHARMA & BIOTECH BANKS DIVERS FINANC INSURANCE
REAL ESTATE SOFTWARE & SERVICES TECH HARD & EQUIP TELECOM SVC UTILITIES
Figure 1 (for sectors) and Figure 2 (for countries) show how correlation,
usually considered substantially stable in the long run, can be considered an
important variable for tactical asset allocation, if satisfactorily forecast.
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
0.0 0.0
1 10 19 28 37 46 55 64 73 82 91 100 109 118 1 10 19 28 37 46 55 64 73 82 91 100 109 118
-0.2 -0.2
-0.4 -0.4
AUSTRALIA AUSTRIA BELGIUM CANADA DENMARK FINLAND FRANCE GERMANY HONG KONG IRELAND ITALY JAPAN
1.0 1.0
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
0.0 0.0
1 10 19 28 37 46 55 64 73 82 91 100 109 118 1 10 19 28 37 46 55 64 73 82 91 100 109 118
-0.2 -0.2
-0.4 -0.4
LUXEMBOURG NETHERLANDS NEW ZEALAND NORWAY PORTUGAL SINGAPORE SPAIN SWEDEN SWITZERLAND UNITED KINGDOM USA
4
Figure 3 – Global correlation candlestick (MSCI World vs. sectors)
100.00%
80.00%
60.00%
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%
ENE MAT CAP COM TRA AUT CON HOT MED RET FOO BEV HOU HEA PHA BAN FIN INS RES SOF TEC TEL UTI
-20.00%
-40.00%
-60.00%
-80.00%
-100.00%
80.00%
60.00%
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%
AUS AUT BEL CAN DEN FIN FRA GER HOK IRE ITA JAP NET NEZ NOR POR SIN SPA SWE SWI UK USA
-20.00%
-40.00%
-60.00%
-80.00%
-100.00%
5
Applying historical returns to a six months holding period, we derive the
efficient frontiers reproduced in Appendix A (sectors) and Appendix B
(countries). We observe how volatile portfolio composition is even rolling
time only by six months (Table 2).
Here we can view how range is, on average, 9,43 for sectors (ó =3,41) and
13,01 for countries (ó =6,99). The ratio computed in the last row is simply
avg[E(r )]
r= [1]
avg(ó )
3. SEMI-CORRELATION CORRELATION
Recently different correlation formulas have been proposed, especially in
order to support financial decision processes. Accepted the idea that the last
correlation matrix hides some traps, because of static view of variance-
covariance, it should be better analyse the time series of these correlations,
as shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2.
Nevertheless, the implementation of the expected correlation values could be
complicated by short term volatility. Here we apply an already known
6
measure of correlation to verify whether it is useful for sector and country
datasets.
According to Erb, Harvey and Viskanta [1994], semi-correlation helps the
analyst to find out the evolution process of two variables through time, so to
decide whenever introduce them into a portfolio in order to diversify
financial assets.
Computed in the same way as the downside risk, the semi-correlation
“provides a measure of equity comovements in common up, common down,
and mixed markets”4.
∑∑ n (x )( )
k h
ij i − x ⋅ yj − y
i =1 j =1
ρ x, y = [2]
∑ n (x ) ∑ n (y − y)
k h
2
−x ⋅
2
i. i .j j
i =1 i =1
Down-down correlation is the [2] solved for solved for all xi < avg(x) and yi
< avg(y).
While, mixed correlation is the [2] when xi > avg(x) and yi < avg(y) or when
when xi < avg(x) and yi > avg(y).
4
Erb, Harvey and Viskanta [1994, 32]
7
Table 3 – Average Correlations (MSCI WORLD vs. MSCI sectors)
DOWN-DOWN
WORLD TOT CORR UP-UP CORR CORR MIXED CORR
AVG VOL AVG VOL AVG VOL AVG VOL
8
The same analysis has been realised for geographic areas: Table 4 shows the
average and volatility values for all the countries and the world index as
well.
The first empirical evidence is the lower volatility that common up and
common down markets show than global correlation. The latter performs a
15,3 per cent volatility for sectors and 12,4 per cent for countries, while the
up-up correlation is respectively 7,1% and 6,7% and the down-down is 7,5%
and 7,2%.
Mixed markets outcomes are relatively more unstable (10,2% for sectors and
10,6% for countries) but still more predictable than the usual way to
compute correlation. Appendix C shows semi-correlations candlestick
9
figures, which offer a technical view of direction and range for every
benchmark in respect with MSCI World Index.
The best result comes from the sector benchmarks, both in sense of
decreasing volatility and in sense of higher negative correlation with mixed
markets.
Nevertheless, our results can be applied only when indexes directions can be
satisfactorily forecast. Next section will show some results obtained with a
neural network for all the dataset.
4. FORECASTING RETURNS
10
from the initial conditions in a dynamic system is the Lyapunov exponents
[McCafferty et al., 1992 and Dechert and Gencay, 1993].
Our results are consistent with those previously obtained through the
dimension of correlation and seem to exclude the presence of a chaotic
regime. In fact, being the Lyapunov exponents negative for all the currencies
examined and all the frequencies, this is indicative of a stable generating
process.
All the empirical results show a strong evidence of the existence of linear
and non linear dependencies for all the examined financial time series, even
though deterministic chaos is not an explanation. These considerations are
coherent with the implementation of econometric models and neural
networks, in order to fit the linear and non linear components here observed.
Data properties authorise some conclusions:
1) time series are asymmetrical and leptokurtic, therefore non normal
distribution is a coherent result with that traditionally obtained for daily
and weekly observations;
2) dependencies found in data are not linked with a white noise
generating process; however, as well underlined by Hsieh [1991], it is
opportune to treat this conclusion with extreme caution, since the higher
the frequency the greater the probability of false dependencies, linked to
the market microstructure;
3) the possibility to describe the patterns through a little dimension
chaotic model has been clearly refused. This result is in contradiction
with a large part of financial literature which found a strong chaotic
component for daily and weekly time series.
5
Bollinger Band High creates a band above and below price. Because the band is
created by adding the standard deviation of price to the moving average of price, the
band width is determined by the fluctuation in price over the last n time periods
(advantage of quick band width reaction to large movements in the market). Thus
the band widens when price fluctuates wildly and narrows when price shows very
little fluctuation. Adjustment of the time periods provides a means of focusing on
anything from short term trends to long term trends. Adjustment of the standard
deviation multiplier controls the relative width of the band and thus determines the
strength of the price movement needed for a price breakout (movement above the
band). A higher standard deviation multiplier increases the relative band width
11
2. Linear weighted moving average difference;
3. Linear extrapolation;
4. Linear regression;
5. Linear regression slope;
6. Linear weighted moving average;
7. Differential moving average;
8. Exponential moving average;
9. Lagged Exponential moving average;
10. Wilder’s RSI6.
Optimisation methods depend on: a) time periods used by the majority of
indicators (simple moving average, lag, change, etc.). b) exponential moving
average factor is used by all indicators based upon one or more exponential
moving average calculations; c) standard deviation time periods are used by
all indicators which calculate a standard deviation; d) linear regression time
periods are used by all indicators which are based upon linear regression.
Three datasets have been extracted with the following rule:
a) training set: 50 per cent;
b) test set: 20 per cent;
c) generalization set (out-of-sample): 30 per cent.
Since time series are built through rolling periods over the period 1994-2001,
we train the neural networks on 61 periods; we test them on 24 periods,
generalizing the results on 36 periods of six months each.
The pattern selection has been random, although it does not guarantee that
every pattern will be chosen an equal number of times. The weight updates
not only included the change dictated by learning rate, but also a portion of
the last weight change as well. Like momentum in physics, a high
momentum term will keep the network generally going in the direction it has
been going. Weight fluctuations will tend to be dampened by a high
momentum term7.
(stronger price movement needed for a breakout), while a lower standard deviation
multiplier decreases the relative band width (weaker price movement needed for a
breakout).
6
WilderRSI = 100 - ( 100 / (1 + RS))
where:
RS = Up / Down (equals zero if down=0).
Initially
Up = Sum of increases over last n time periods divided by n
Down = Sum of decreases over last n time periods divided by n
Remainder of time
Up = [ Previous Up * (n-1) + increase ] / n
Down = [ Previous Down * (n-1) + decrease ] / n
7
The same parameters have been used for correlations forecasts, showed in the next
section of the paper.
12
4.3. Forecasting results
Table 5 contains error measures for every neural network computed in the
generalisation set (out-of-sample) for all the sector indexes (Appendix D
shows all the figures with actual and estimated data).
Table 6 contains the same error measures for the country indexes (Appendix
E shows the figures with actual and estimated values).
13
Table 6 – Out-of-sample forecast performance (MSCI countries)
CORR
R squared r squared MSE MAE MIN AE MAX AE COEFF
AUSTRALIA 0.4363 0.5063 0.002 0.032 0.001 0.105 0.7115
AUSTRIA 0.763 0.7668 0.003 0.042 0.002 0.193 0.8757
BELGIUM 0.8379 0.8559 0.002 0.039 0.004 0.156 0.9252
CANADA 0.7435 0.7488 0.005 0.046 0.003 0.273 0.8653
DENMARK 0.5557 0.6063 0.004 0.051 0.002 0.145 0.7786
FINLAND 0.7887 0.7889 0.027 0.110 0.001 0.567 0.8882
FRANCE 0.8029 0.8058 0.004 0.051 0.003 0.154 0.8977
GERMANY 0.7480 0.7591 0.007 0.067 0.005 0.209 0.8712
HONG KONG 0.7600 0.7860 0.010 0.076 0.005 0.245 0.8865
IRELAND 0.7918 0.7967 0.004 0.046 0.004 0.153 0.8926
ITALY 0.7624 0.7733 0.007 0.066 0.005 0.256 0.8794
JAPAN 0.7640 0.8033 0.004 0.045 0.001 0.161 0.8962
NETHERLANDS 0.7232 0.7468 0.004 0.053 0.003 0.169 0.8642
NEW ZEALAND 0.6201 0.6795 0.002 0.042 0.002 0.096 0.8243
NORWAY 0.7263 0.7555 0.003 0.048 0.002 0.187 0.8692
PORTUGAL 0.8421 0.843 0.006 0.064 0.000 0.159 0.9181
SINGAPORE 0.8913 0.8949 0.006 0.057 0.005 0.240 0.9460
SPAIN 0.7657 0.7664 0.007 0.065 0.005 0.220 0.8754
SWEDEN 0.8461 0.8508 0.008 0.063 0.000 0.330 0.9224
SWITZERLAND 0.6891 0.7114 0.005 0.054 0.002 0.161 0.8435
UNITED KINGDOM 0.6705 0.6747 0.002 0.036 0.001 0.094 0.8214
USA 0.6232 0.6624 0.003 0.040 0.004 0.188 0.8139
WORLD 0.6260 0.6638 0.002 0.039 0.003 0.124 0.8148
14
Determination coefficient, MAE and MSE can be misshapen indexes when
errors are in terms of direction. In fact, semi-correlation needs a good
forecast of co-movements and mixed ones.
If we measure reliability of estimates by path accuracy from one period to
the following one (Table 8), the results show that neural networks forecast
better countries indexes than sectors (92,17% vs. 88,45%).
5. FORECASTING CORRELATIONS
8
For every technical detail, see section 4.
15
The interesting outcomes here are the lower predictability of semi-
correlation for sectors, especially down-down and mixed ones.
This result is consistent with the ability to forecast the correct direction of
benchmark returns, as seen in Table 8, in particular for countries indexes.
16
6. EFFICIENT FRONTIERS
9
Pagnoni – Gabbi (2001) find out a comparison of other forecasting methods, such
as historical, capital asset pricing, building block, applied to equity and bond
markets.
17
Table 12 – Return and volatility gaps between global and semi-correlation
efficient frontiers
SECTORS COUNTRIES
MIN MAX MIN MAX
E[r] ó E[r] ó E[r] ó E[r] Ó
RETURN GAP 0.49 -0.35 0.45 -0.53 0.03 -0.66 0.98 -0.85
VOL GAP 0.08 -0.03 -0.07 -0.07 -0.19 -0.13 0.20 -0.08
RATIO 0.27 0.14 0.47 0.16
For all the expected returns we have an increasing value, especially for the
maximum values. This is coupled with a lower level of volatility, due to the
better definition of correlation in the optimising process.
Figure 5 and Figure 6 report all the spreads for every forecasting period,
respectively for sectors and countries.
11
10
min max
18
Figure 6 – Return spreads (MSCI countries)
11
10
min max
7. CONCLUSIONS
Our study shows that in periods of high volatility in correlation coefficients,
the application of the phase indicator can facilitate the process of
optimisation in building financial portfolios.
The answers offered by the study are:
5) short-term correlation, if adequately modelled, can be fundamental
to implement a successful tactical asset allocation. Decisive can be
the existence of numerous cycle inversions in correlation.
6) We obtained correlations lower volatile thanks to the application of
semi-correlation measure. The evidence is that the up-up correlation
is 7,1% for sectors and 6,7% for countries, while down-down
correlation is 7,5% and 7,2%. Mixed markets outcomes are
relatively unstable.
7) Neural networks applied to benchmark returns generate good results,
especially in terms of direction: this is, in fact, the necessary input
19
for the application of semi-correlation to the asset allocation process.
Outcomes confirm that if applied to countries, the model works
better: direction residuals are 11,55% for sectors and 7,83% for
countries.
8) Finally, expected returns and semi-correlations have been used to
build the efficient frontiers. Results that is worth quoting are:
a. Gap ratios among returns and volatility grow for both the
groups and extreme values of the frontiers;
b. The upward of risk/return ratio is still better for
geographical diversification, especially in the minimum
values of expected returns.
REFERENCES
Ashley R.A., Patterson D.M., 1989, Linear versus Nonlinear Macroeconomics: A Statistical
Test International Economic Review, 30 (3), 685-704.
Barnett W., Chen, P., 1986, The Aggregation-Theoretic Monetary Aggregates are Chaotic
and have Strange Attractions, in W. Barnett, E. Berndt and H. R White (eds),
Dynamic Econometric Modelling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bramante, Colombo, Gabbi, 1998, Are Neural Network and Econometric Forecasts Good for
Trading? Stochastic Variance Model as a Filter Rule, in A.-P. N. Refenes – A. N.
Burgess – J. E. Moody (eds), Decision Technologies for Computational Management
Science, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
Bramante, Gabbi, 2001, Optimal Portfolio Choice Under Changing Risk, Forecasting
Financial Markets 2001, London, May-June.
Brock W.A., Dechert W.D., Scheinkman J.A., 1987, A Test for Independence Based on the
Correlation Dimension, Working Paper, University of Houston and University of
Chicago.
Dechert W.D., Gencay R., 1993, Lyapunov Exponents as a Nonparametric Diagnostic for
Stability Analysis, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 7, S41-S61.
Diebold F.X., 1988, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical System, Springer-Verlag,
New York.
Erb, Harvey and Viskanta, 1994, Forecasting International Equity Correlations, “Financial
Analysts Journal”, November-December.
Frank M.Z., Stengos T., 1988a, Chaotic Dynamics in Economic Time Series, Journal of
Economic Surveys 2, 103-133.
Frank M.Z. Stengos T., 1988b, Some Evidence Concerning Macroeconomic Chaos, Journal of
Monetary Economics 22, 423-438.
Gabbi, Colombo, Bramante, Viola, De Vito, Tumietto, 2000, Predicting the Exchange Rate: A
Comparison of Econometric Models, Neural Networks, and Trading Systems, “ITFA
Journal”, 2000 edition.
Groenen, Franses, 2000, Visualizing time-varying correlations across stock markets, “Journal
of Empirical Finance”, vol. 7.
Harlow, 1991, Asset Allocation in a Downside Risk Framework, “Financial Analysts Journal”,
vol. 47, n. 5.
20
Harlow, Rao, 1989, Asset Pricing in a Generalized Mean-Lower Partial Moment Framework,
“Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis”, vol. 24, n. 3.
Hsieh D. A., 1991, Chaos and Nonlinear Dynamics: Application to Financial Market, The
Journal of Finance, No.5.
McCafferty D.F., Ellner S. Gallant A.R., Nychka D.W., 1992, Estimating the Lyapunov
Exponent of a Chaotic System with Nonparametric Regression, Journal of American
Statistical Association, 87.
Pagnoni, Gabbi, 2001, Tactical Asset Allocation and Time Diversification for Bond and
Equity Markets, Forecasting Financial Markets 2001, London, May-June.
Solnik, Boucrelle, Le Fur, 1996, International Correlation and Volatility, « Financial
Analysts Journal », September/October.
Zhang G., Patuwo B. E., Hu M. Y., 1998, Forecasting with Artificial Neural Networks: The
State of the Art, International Journal of Forecasting, vol. 14.
21
Appendix A
Short-term (6 months) holding period efficient frontiers
(MSCI sectors)
Appendix B
Short-term (6 months) holding period efficient frontiers
(MSCI countries)
Appendix C
Correlation Candlestick
Appendix D
Generalization sets MSCI sectors
Appendix D
Generalization sets MSCI countries
22
Appendix A – Short-term (6 months) holding period efficient frontiers (MSCI
sectors)
-5.0 -4.0
-4.5
-6.0
-5.0 MSCI Construct & Housing TR
-7.0 -5.5
MSCI Real Estate TR
-6.0
-8.0 -6.5
-9.0 -7.0
0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.6 4.0 4.4 4.8 5.2 5.6 6.0 6.4 6.8 7.2 7.6 8.0 8.4 8.8 9.2 9.6 10.0
-10.0 Standard Deviation (Risk)
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0
Standard Deviation (Risk)
Expected Return
11.0
Expected Return
10.5 12.0
11.5
10.0 MSCI Health & Personal Care TR
11.0
MSCI Recreation, Cons Goods TR MSCI Financial Services TR
9.5 10.5
MSCI Business & Public Serv TR 10.0
9.0 MSCI Health & Personal Care TR
9.5
8.5 MSCI Broadcast & Publish TR 9.0
8.5
8.0
8.0
MSCI Electrical & Electronics TR
7.5 7.5
MSCI Insurance TR MSCI Real Estate TR
7.0
7.0 MSCI Leisure & Tourism TR MSCI Forest Prod & Paper TR MSCI Electrical & Electronics TR
MSCI Telecomm TR
6.5
6.5 6.0 MSCI Business & Public Serv TR
MSCI Financial Services TR MSCI Leisure & Tourism
MSCI TR
Automobiles TR
MSCI Insurance TR MSCI Real Estate TR 5.5 MSCI Chemicals TR
6.0 MSCI Energy Sources TR 5.0
MSCI Transport - Road&Rail TR MSCI Food & Hshold Prod TR MSCI Banking TR
5.5 MSCI Telecomm TR 4.5 MSCI Broadcast & Publish TR
MSCI Energy Sources TRMSCI Machinery & Engineering TR
MSCI Banking TR 4.0
5.0 MSCI Chemicals TR 3.5 MSCI Utilities - Elec&Gas TR
MSCI Utilities - Elec&Gas TR MSCI Indust Components TR
4.5 3.0
2.5
4.0 MSCI Food & Hshold Prod TR MSCI Recreation, Cons Goods TR Misc Materials&Commod TR
MSCI 2.0 MSCI Transport - Road&Rail TR MSCI Misc Materials&Commod TR
-9.0
-1.5 MSCI Telecomm TR
-10.0
-2.0 MSCI Construct & Housing TR
-11.0
-2.5
-12.0
-3.0 -13.0
0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2 4.5 4.8 5.1 5.4 5.7 6.0 6.3 6.6 6.9 7.2 7.5 7.8 8.1 8.4 8.7 9.0 -14.0
Standard Deviation (Risk)
0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2 4.5 4.8 5.1 5.4 5.7 6.0 6.3 6.6 6.9 7.2 7.5 7.8 8.1 8.4 8.7 9.0
Standard Deviation (Risk)
-8.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0
Standard Deviation (Risk)
-9.0
0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.6 4.0 4.4 4.8 5.2 5.6 6.0 6.4 6.8 7.2 7.6 8.0 8.4 8.8 9.2 9.6 10.0 10.4 11.0
Standard Deviation (Risk)
Expected Return
Expected Return
14.0
20.0
13.0 MSCI Telecomm TR
18.0
12.0
MSCI Electrical & Electronics TR
16.0 11.0
10.0 MSCI Business & Public Serv TR
14.0
MSCI Telecomm TR
9.0 MSCI Broadcast & Publish TR
12.0
MSCI Insurance TR 8.0
10.0 MSCI Broadcast & Publish TR MSCI Business & Public Serv TR 7.0
MSCI Health & Personal Care TR
6.0 MSCI Health & Personal Care TR MSCI Electrical & Electronics TR
8.0
MSCI Financial Services TR 5.0
MSCI Automobiles TRMSCI Banking TR MSCI Construct & Housing TR
6.0 MSCI Recreation, Cons Goods TR MSCI Building Mat & Construct TR 4.0
MSCI Leisure & Tourism TR
MSCI Chemicals TR MSCI Transport - Road&Rail TR MSCI Real Estate TR
4.0 3.0 MSCI Insurance TR
MSCI Food & Hshold Prod TR MSCI Utilities - Elec&Gas TR MSCI Construct & Housing TR MSCI Financial Services TR
2.0
2.0 MSCI Utilities - Elec&Gas MSCI Energy Sources TR
TR Components
MSCI Indust TR
1.0 MSCI Automobiles TR
MSCI Machinery & Engineering TR MSCI Forest Prod & Paper TR
0.0
0.0
MSCI Food & Hshold Prod TR
-2.0 -1.0 MSCI Leisure
MSCI Indust Components TR & Tourism TR
MSCITR Misc Materials&Commod TR MSCI Forest Prod
MSCI Transport - Road&Rail -2.0 MSCI Building Mat & Construct TR & Paper TR
-4.0
-3.0 MSCI Banking TR
MSCI Energy Sources TR
MSCI Recreation, Cons Goods TR
-6.0 -4.0 MSCI Machinery & Engineering TR
MSCI Misc Materials&Commod TR
-8.0 -5.0
-6.0
-10.0 MSCI Real Estate TR
-7.0
MSCI Chemicals TR
-12.0 -8.0
-14.0 -9.0
-10.0
-16.0
-11.0
-18.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0 21.0 22.0 23.0
Standard Deviation (Risk)
-20.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0 10.5 11.0 11.5 12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0
Standard Deviation (Risk)
Expected Return
16.0
15.0
MSCI Electrical & Electronics TR
14.0
13.0
12.0
0.0
-1.0
-2.0
MSCI Health & Personal Care TR
-3.0
MSCI Utilities - Elec&Gas TR
-4.0
MSCI Food & Hshold
MSCIProd
Insurance
TR TR
-5.0
-6.0
-7.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0
Standard Deviation (Risk)
24
Appendix B – Short-term (6 months) holding period efficient frontiers (MSCI
countries)
Expected Return
7.0
6.5 MSCI Finland TR
Expected Return
8.0 6.0
7.5 5.5 MSCI Norway TR
MSCI Finland TR
7.0 MSCI Italy TR 5.0
6.5 4.5 MSCI Ireland TR
6.0
4.0
5.5
3.5 MSCI Sweden TR
5.0 MSCI Japan TR MSCI U.S. TR
4.5 3.0 MSCI Netherlands TR
4.0 2.5
3.5 2.0
MSCI Norway TR MSCI U.K. TR MSCI New Zealand TR
3.0 1.5 MSCI Canada TR
2.5 1.0
MSCI World TR MSCI Portugal TR
2.0 MSCI Sweden TR MSCI Italy TR
0.5 MSCI World TR
1.5 MSCI Denmark TR MSCI Germany TR
0.0 MSCI Belgium TR
1.0 MSCI Ireland TR
-0.5 MSCI Singapore TR
0.5 MSCI U.S. TR
MSCI Belgium TRMSCI Canada TR MSCI Switzerland TR
0.0 -1.0 MSCI Spain TR
MSCI Netherlands TR MSCI Australia TR MSCI France TR
-0.5 MSCI New Zealand TR -1.5 MSCI Denmark TR
MSCI Australia TR
-1.0 -2.0
-1.5 MSCI Spain TR
MSCI Germany TR -2.5
-2.0 MSCI France TR MSCI Portugal TR -3.0
-2.5
MSCI U.K. TR -3.5
-3.0
MSCI Singapore TR -4.0
-3.5
-4.0 MSCI Switzerland TR -4.5
-4.5 MSCI Austria TR MSCI Japan TR
-5.0
-5.0 -5.5
-5.5 -6.0 MSCI Austria TR
-6.0
-6.5
-6.5
-7.0 -7.0
-7.5 MSCI Hong Kong TR
-7.5
-8.0 MSCI Hong Kong TR -8.0
-8.5 -8.5
-9.0 -9.0
-9.5 -9.5
-10.0
-10.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0 10.5 11.0 11.5 12.0 12.5 13.0
Standard Deviation (Risk)
Standard Deviation (Risk)
Expected Return
11.0
MSCI Finland TR
Expected Return
10.0
15.0
MSCI U.S. TR
9.0 14.0 MSCI Japan TR
13.0
8.0 MSCI Sweden TR
12.0
7.0 MSCI New Zealand TR
11.0
MSCI World TR
MSCI Australia TR
6.0 MSCI Hong Kong TR 10.0
MSCI Canada TR
MSCI U.K. TR 9.0
5.0 MSCIMSCI
Belgium TR
Netherlands TR MSCI Hong Kong TR
MSCI Netherlands TR MSCI U.S. TR MSCI Spain TR
8.0
MSCI Spain TR
4.0 MSCI Ireland TR
MSCI Belgium TR MSCI Switzerland TR 7.0
MSCI Denmark TR
3.0 MSCI Germany TR 6.0 MSCI Switzerland TR MSCI Germany TR
MSCI U.K. TR MSCI World TR
MSCI France TR 5.0 MSCI Ireland TR MSCI Canada TR
MSCI Singapore TR
2.0 MSCI Denmark TR
MSCI Italy TR 4.0 MSCI Australia TR MSCI France TR
MSCI Portugal TR
1.0
3.0
MSCI Norway TR MSCI Sweden TR
0.0 2.0
MSCI Singapore TR MSCI New Zealand TR MSCI Italy TR
-1.0 MSCI Austria TR 1.0
MSCI Norway TR MSCI Austria TR
MSCI Portugal TR
0.0
-2.0
-1.0
-3.0 -2.0
-4.0 -3.0
-4.0
-5.0 MSCI Japan TR
-5.0
-6.0
-6.0 MSCI Finland TR
-7.0 -7.0
-8.0
-8.0
-9.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0
Standard Deviation (Risk) 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0
Standard Deviation (Risk)
Expected Return
Expected Return 20.0
11.0
10.5 18.0
MSCI Portugal TR MSCI Finland TR
10.0
16.0
9.5
9.0 14.0
8.5 MSCI Spain TR
MSCI Denmark TR MSCI Sweden TR
8.0 12.0
7.5
10.0 MSCI Netherlands TR MSCI Portugal TR
7.0 MSCI Norway TR
6.5 MSCI Belgium TR MSCI U.S. TR
MSCI Netherlands TR 8.0 MSCI U.K. TR MSCI Canada TR
MSCI Germany TR
6.0 MSCI Spain TR MSCI France TR
5.5
MSCI Ireland TR 6.0 MSCI Ireland TR MSCI Italy TR
5.0 MSCI New Zealand TR MSCI Switzerland
MSCI Hong Kong TR
TR
MSCI France TR
4.5 4.0 MSCI World TR
4.0 MSCI Belgium TR MSCI Australia TR
MSCIMSCI
Sweden TR TR
Germany MSCI Finland TR
3.5 MSCI Denmark TR 2.0
3.0 MSCI Austria TR
MSCI Canada TR MSCI Hong Kong TR
2.5 MSCI Norway TR 0.0 MSCI Singapore TR
2.0 MSCI U.S. TR MSCI Switzerland TR
MSCI World TR MSCI Austria TR
1.5 -2.0
1.0 MSCI U.K. TR
MSCI Italy TR -4.0
0.5 MSCI New Zealand TR MSCI Japan TR
0.0 -6.0
-0.5 MSCI Australia TR
MSCI Japan TR
-1.0 -8.0
-1.5
-2.0 -10.0
-2.5
-3.0 -12.0
-3.5
-14.0
-4.0
-4.5 MSCI Singapore TR
-16.0
-5.0
-5.5 -18.0
-6.0
-6.5 -20.0
-7.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0 10.5 11.0 11.5 12.0 12.5 13.0 Standard Deviation (Risk)
Standard Deviation (Risk)
-4.0 -24.0
-26.0
-6.0
-28.0
-8.0 -30.0
-10.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0 21.0
Standard Deviation (Risk)
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0
Standard Deviation (Risk)
25
Expected Return
20.0
Expected Return
30.0 18.0
MSCI Finland TR
28.0 16.0
26.0 MSCI Finland TR
14.0
24.0
22.0 12.0
20.0 10.0 MSCI Singapore TR
18.0 MSCI Spain TR
MSCI Belgium TR MSCI Hong Kong TR
MSCI Italy TR 8.0
16.0 MSCI Germany TR MSCI U.S. TR
14.0 MSCI Switzerland TRMSCI France TR MSCI Portugal TR 6.0
12.0 MSCI World TR
MSCI Austria TR
4.0
MSCI Sweden TR MSCI Australia TR
10.0 MSCI Ireland TR MSCI
MSCI Belgium TR NewItaly
MSCI Zealand
TR TR
MSCI Ireland TR 2.0
8.0 MSCI U.S. TR MSCI U.K. TR
MSCI Netherlands TR MSCI France TR
0.0 MSCI Spain TR
MSCI Portugal TR
6.0 MSCI World TR
MSCI Canada TR
4.0 MSCI U.K. TR MSCI Denmark TR MSCI Switzerland TR
-2.0 MSCI Germany TR
2.0
MSCI Australia TR
MSCI Canada MSCI
TR MSCIMSCI
JapanDenmark
TR MSCI Sweden TR
MSCI Japan TR Norway TR TR
-4.0 MSCI Netherlands TR
0.0 MSCI New Zealand TR
-2.0 -6.0
-4.0
-8.0
-6.0 MSCI Norway TR
-10.0
-8.0
-16.0
-16.0
-18.0 -18.0
-20.0
-20.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0
Standard Deviation (Risk) 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 29.0
Standard Deviation (Risk)
Expected Return
30.0
26.0
24.0
22.0
18.0
16.0
-2.0
MSCI Portugal TR
MSCI Belgium TR
-4.0
-6.0
-8.0
-10.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0 21.0 22.0 23.0
Standard Deviation (Risk)
26
Appendix C – Correlation Candlestick
Figure 7 –Up-up correlation candlestick (MSCI countries)
100.00%
80.00%
60.00%
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%
AUS AUT BEL CAN DEN FIN FRA GER HOK IRE ITA JAP NET NEZ NOR POR SIN SPA SWE SWI UK USA
-20.00%
-40.00%
-60.00%
-80.00%
-100.00%
100.00%
80.00%
60.00%
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%
AUS AUT BEL CAN DEN FIN FRA GER HOK IRE ITA JAP NET NEZ NOR POR SIN SPA SWE SWI UK USA
-20.00%
-40.00%
-60.00%
-80.00%
-100.00%
27
Figure 9 – Mixed correlation candlestick (MSCI countries)
100.00%
80.00%
60.00%
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%
AUS AUT BEL CAN DEN FIN FRA GER HOK IRE ITA JAP NET NEZ NOR POR SIN SPA SWE SWI UK USA
-20.00%
-40.00%
-60.00%
-80.00%
-100.00%
100.00%
80.00%
60.00%
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%
ENE MAT CAP COM TRA AUT CON HOT MED RET FOO BEV HOU HEA PHA BAN FIN INS RES SOF TEC TEL UTI
-20.00%
-40.00%
-60.00%
-80.00%
-100.00%
28
Figure 11 – Down-down correlation candlestick (MSCI sectors)
100.00%
80.00%
60.00%
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%
ENE MAT CAP COM TRA AUT CON HOT MED RET FOO BEV HOU HEA PHA BAN FIN INS RES SOF TEC TEL UTI
-20.00%
-40.00%
-60.00%
-80.00%
-100.00%
80.00%
60.00%
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%
ENE MAT CAP COM TRA AUT CON HOT MED RET FOO BEV HOU HEA PHA BAN FIN INS RES SOF TEC TEL UTI
-20.00%
-40.00%
-60.00%
-80.00%
-100.00%
29
Appendix D – Generalization sets MSCI sectors
0.3 0.2
0.25
0.15
0.2
0.1
0.15
0.05
0.1
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
0.05
-0.05
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
-0.1
-0.05
-0.15
-0.1
-0.2
-0.15
-0.25
-0.2
MATERIAL NEURAL NET
ENERGY NEURAL NET
Out-of-sample returns - MSCI CAPITAL GOODS Out-of-sample returns - MSCI COMML SVC & SUPPL
0.3 0.2
0.25
0.15
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.1
0.05 0.05
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
0
-0.05 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
-0.1
-0.05
-0.15
-0.2 -0.1
CAPITAL GOODS NEURAL NET COMML SVC & SUPPL NEURAL NET
0.2
0.2
0.15
0.15
0.1
0.1
0.05
0.05
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
0
-0.05 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
-0.05
-0.1
-0.15 -0.1
-0.2 -0.15
-0.25 -0.2
Out-of-sample returns - MSCI CONS DUR & APPAREL Out-of-sample returns - MSCI HOTELS RESTAURANTS AND LEISURE
0.3 0.25
0.25 0.2
0.2
0.15
0.15
0.1
0.1
0.05
0.05
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
-0.05
-0.05
-0.1
-0.1
-0.15
-0.15
-0.2
-0.2
HOTELS REST & LEIS NEURAL NET
CONS DUR & APPAREL NEURAL NET
30
Out-of-sample returns - MSCI MEDIA
Out-of-sample returns - MSCI RETAILING
0.6
0.4
0.5
0.3
0.4
0.2
0.3
0.2 0.1
0.1
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
-0.1
-0.1
-0.2 -0.2
-0.3
-0.3
MEDIA NEURAL NET
RETAILING NEURAL NET
Out-of-sample returns - MSCI FOOD & DRUG Out-of-sample returns - MSCI FOOD BEV & TOBACCO
0.3 0.2
0.15
0.2
0.1
0.05
0.1
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
0 -0.05
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
-0.1
-0.1
-0.15
-0.2
-0.2
-0.25
-0.3
-0.3
FOOD BEV & TOBACCO NEURAL NET
FOOD & DRUG RETL NEURAL NET
0.2 0.2
0.1 0.1
0
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
-0.1
-0.1
-0.2
-0.2
-0.3
-0.3
H CARE EQUIP & SVC NEURAL NET
HOUSE & PERS PROD NEURAL NET
Out-of-sample returns - MSCI PHARMA & BIOTECH Out-of-sample returns - MSCI BANKS
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.2
0.15 0.1
0.1
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
0.05
0 -0.1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
-0.05
-0.2
-0.1
-0.3
-0.15
BANKS NEURAL NET
PHARMA & BIOTECH NEURAL NET
31
Out-of-sample returns - MSCI DIVERS FINANCIAL Out-of-sample returns - MSCI INSURANCE
0.3 0.35
0.3
0.25
0.25
0.2
0.2
0.15 0.15
0.1
0.1
0.05
0.05
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
0
-0.05
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
-0.05 -0.1
-0.15
-0.1
INSURANCE NEURAL NET
DIVERS FINANC NEURAL NET
Out-of-sample returns - MSCI SOFTWARE Out-of-sample returns - MSCI TECH HARD & EQUIPMENT
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
0.4 0.4
0.2
0.2
0
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
-0.2
-0.2
-0.4
-0.4
-0.6
-0.6
TECH HARD & EQUIP NEURAL NET
SOFTWARE & SERVICES NEURAL NET
0.4
0.15
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.05
0.1
0 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
-0.1
-0.05
-0.2
-0.1
-0.3
-0.15
-0.4
UTILITIES NEURAL NET
TELECOM SVC NEURAL NET
32
Appendix E – Generalization sets MSCI countries
Out-of-sample returns - MSCI AUSTRALIA Out-of-sample returns - MSCI AUSTRIA
0.2 0.5
0.4
0.15
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.05
0.1
0 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
-0.1
-0.05
-0.2
-0.1
-0.3
-0.15 -0.4
0.6
0.3
0.5
0.2 0.4
0.3
0.1
0.2
0 0.1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
-0.1
-0.1
-0.2
-0.2
CANADA NEURAL NET
BELGIUM NEURAL NET
1.4
0.3
1.2
1
0.2
0.8
0.1 0.6
0.4
0
0.2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
0
-0.1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
-0.2
-0.4
-0.2
FINLAND NEURAL NET
DENMARK NEURAL NET
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
-0.1 -0.1
-0.2 -0.2
33
Out-of-sample returns - MSCI HONG KONG Out-of-sample returns - MSCI IRELAND
0.5 0.6
0.4
0.5
0.3
0.4
0.2
0.3
0.1
0 0.2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
-0.1 0.1
-0.2
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
-0.3
-0.1
-0.4
-0.2
-0.5
IRELAND NEURAL NET
HONG KONG NEURAL NET
0.6
0.3
0.5
0.2
0.4
0.1
0.3
0.2
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
0.1
-0.1
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
-0.2
-0.1
-0.2 -0.3
0.5 0.15
0.4 0.1
0.3 0.05
0.2 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
0.1 -0.05
-0.1
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
-0.15
-0.1
-0.2
-0.2
NEW ZEALAND NEURAL NET
NETHERLANDS NEURAL NET
0.6
0.2
0.5
0.1 0.4
0.3
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
0.2
-0.1
0.1
0
-0.2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
-0.1
-0.3
-0.2
-0.3
-0.4
PORTUGAL NEURAL NET
NORWAY NEURAL NET
34
Out-of-sample returns - MSCI SINGAPORE Out-of-sample returns - MSCI SPAIN
0.8 0.7
0.7 0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.2 0.2
0.1 0.1
0
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
-0.1
-0.1
-0.2
-0.2
-0.3
SPAIN NEURAL NET
SINGAPORE NEURAL NET
0.5 0.25
0.4 0.2
0.3 0.15
0.2 0.1
0.1 0.05
0 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
-0.1 -0.05
-0.2 -0.1
0.25 0.2
0.2
0.15
0.15
0.1
0.1
0.05
0.05
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
-0.05
-0.05
-0.1
-0.1
-0.15 -0.15
35