Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
and Women
N. Delattrea, M. A. Lafortuneb, P. Morettoa
a
Laboratoire d’Etudes de la Motricité Humaine, Faculté des Sciences du Sport, Université de Lille 2, France.
b
Nike Sport Research Laboratory, Beaverton, Oregon 97005, USA
pierre.moretto@univ-lille2.fr
Men
Condition 0 Condition 1 Condition 2 In women, the number of similarities was the same in each
experimental condition (conditions 0, 1 and 2) (2 significant
Weight L CT Weight L CT Weight L CT
correlations). The use of Strouhal number or Froude number
Height 0.595
didn’t seem to allow obtaining more similarities than with the
Weight use of the same absolute velocity.
L 0.292
However, from a qualitative viewpoint, Strouhal number
CT
was the best condition since it allowed obtaining mean
TP 0.732 0.727 0.295 0.880
similarity of r=0.914 [0.913-0.915], where mean r=0.900
Peak 0.754 -0.301 .694 -0.459 0.444 -0.688
[0.890-0.911] with the same absolute velocity, and mean
LR 0.568 -0.547 0.416 -0.656 -0.811 r=0.895 [0.893-0.897] with the Froude number.
Iz 0.844 0.732 0.886 0.519 0.340
The dynamic similar conditions determined from Strouhal
number also appeared to be the best method to obtain inter-
subjects similarities in women.
Women
Condition 0 Condition 1 Condition 2
These results showed an interest at using the Strouhal
number for the determination of inter-subjects running
Weight L CT Weight L CT Weight L CT
dynamic similar in men and women. Taking into account the
Height 0.386 0.629
leg elastic characteristics allowed observing similar running
Weight individuals’ behaviour according to [7, 8, 9, 10].
L
Nevertheless, with the sight of results, it appeared that, in
CT -0.398
men, the parameters were mainly proportional to the contact
TP 0.382 0.672
time (CT), whereas in women, similarities are principally to the
Peak 0.890 -0.381 0.893 -0.407 0.915 -0.552
weight. So, it seemed that dynamic similar conditions imposed
LR 0.488 -0.433 0.610 0.477 in this study revealed different behaviours in relation to
Iz 0.911 0.897 0.913 genders: men’s pattern is mainly organised in accordance with
*: P<0.01; L: leg length; CT: contact time; TP: time to peak; peak: passive peak; LR: loading rate; Iz: time dimension respect, while women’s pattern are principally
vertical impulse; grayed values: correlations superior to the best anthropometric correlation (0.595 in
men. 0.629 in women).
organised to manage the mass. This difference in the pattern
organisation is probably due to leg stiffness differences
between the two genders.
IV. DISCUSSION A gender difference in leg stiffness has already been
observed during hopping tasks [11]. These authors showed that
The aim of this study was to verify that the dynamic similar women’s leg stiffness represented about 77% of that of the
conditions determined from Froude number or from Strouhal men. Moreover, it has been showed that vertical ground
number allowed obtaining better similarities than using the reaction force depends on masses and vertical velocities [12].
same absolute velocity for all subjects. These last can be estimated by the spring-mass model, and
A condition was considered to be the best if it allowed depends on the step frequency and musculo-squeletal stiffness.
obtaining a greater number of similarities (quantitative aspect), Thus, in our study, the difference in musculo-squeletal stiffness
and if it allowed obtaining the greater mean correlation could explain the differences between men and women. It
(qualitative aspect). seemed necessary to take leg stiffness into account for the
dynamic similar conditions determination.
In men, when taking only correlations superior to r=0.7
(r²=0.5) into account, the use of Strouhal number (condition 2)
Furthermore, it has been suggested that dynamic similar
conditions are respected whether subjects run with the same
Froude number and the same Strouhal number [5]. The number
of similarities observed could be more important with the
determination of dynamic similar conditions including Froude
number and Strouhal number simultaneously. However, it
seems that confusion exists on the simultaneous use of Froude
and Strouhal numbers, sometimes gathered under the term of
“Groucho number” which is disputable.
Future investigations should be conducted to clarify the
meaning of the “Groucho number” and to determine inter-
subjects similar dynamic running conditions from
dimensionless numbers taking the leg stiffness into account.
REFERENCES
[1] Alexander R. McN. and Jayes A.S. “A dynamic similarity hypothesis for
the gaits of quadrupedal mammals”, J. Zool., Lond. 201, pp. 135-152,
1983.
[2] Bisiaux M., Moretto P., Lensel G., Thévenon A. “Determination of an
expected plantar pressure threshold : dimensionless approach use to
reduce the variability of the plantar pressures”, Ann. Readapt. Med.
Phys., vol. 46, pp. 539-544, 2003.
[3] Moretto P., Bisiaux M., Lafortune M.A. “Froude number fractions to
increase walking pattern dynamic similarities : Application to plantar
pressure study in healthy subjects”, Gait Posture, in press.
[4] Lee C.R. and Farley C.T. “Determinants of the center of mass trajectory
in human walking and running”, J. Exp. Biology, vol. 201, pp. 2935-
2944, 1998.
[5] Alexander R. McN. “Optimization and gait in locomotion of
vertebrates”, Physiol. Rev., vol. 69, pp. 1199-1227, 1989.
[6] Donelan J.M. and Kram R. “The effect of reduced gravity on the
kinematics of human walking: a test of the dynamic similarity
hypothesis for locomotion”, J. Exp. Biology, vol. 200, pp. 3193-3201,
1997.
[7] Alexander R. McN. “Elastic mechanisms in animal movement”,
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 30-50, 1988.
[8] McMahon T.A. and Cheng G.C. “The mechanics of running how does
stiffness couple with speed ?”, J. Biomech., vol. 23 (suppl. 1), pp. 65-78,
1990.
[9] Farley C.T. and Gonzalez O. “Leg stiffness and stride frequency in
human running”, J. Biomech., vol. 29, pp. 181-186, 1996.
[10] Ferris D. P. and Farley C.T. “Interaction of leg stiffness and surface
stiffness during human hopping”, J. Appl. Physiol., vol. 82, pp. 15-22,
1997.
[11] Granata K.P., Padua D.A., Wilson S.E. “Gender differences in active
musculoskeletal stiffness. Part II : Quantification of leg stiffness during
functional hopping tasks”, J. Electromyogr. Kin., vol. 12, pp. 127-135,
2002.
[12] McMahon T. A., Valiant G. and Frederick E.C. “Groucho running”, J.
Appl. Physiol., vol. 62, pp. 2326-2337, 1987.