Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Louisiana, 1977. Brothers Patrick and Eddie Sonnier admitted mugging David
LeBlanc, age seventeen, and Loretta Bourque, eighteen, one autumn night, but each
blamed the other for murdering them and raping Bourque. Eddie was sentenced to life,
Patrick to death by electrocution. In the summer of 1982, Sister Helen Prejean
had moved into St. Thomas Housing Project, one of New Orleans’s most violent
neighborhoods, when a friend asked her to be a pen pal to Pat Sonnier. Viewing the
proposal as an extension of her ministry to the poor, Prejean agreed, and
opened her eyes to the underworld of life on death row. She accompanied
Sonnier through the next two years, until the day the state shaved his head
for the electrodes, strapped him into the chair, and executed him.
Her second book, The Death of Innocents, was published in 2004. She is currently
the honorary chairperson of the Moratorium Campaign.
Interview
The death penalty legalizes the torture and killing of our own
citizens and imitates their violence in order to deter or punish. I
came to this realization only after my first witnessing of a state execution. When I came
out of that execution chamber with Patrick, I was clear, clear inside. You are either
paralyzed by something like that or you are galvanized. And I call
being galvanized the resurrection principle of life—
overcoming death, and resisting evil. You know how Gandhi
said you have to expose evil and you have to actively resist ?
That day, my mission was born. Patrick was dead but I didn’t have a choice. It was just
something I had to do because I knew I was a primary witness and I would
take people there through my stories. So for fifteen years I have been
working to stop the death penalty.
But I see in my audience a distancing from the death penalty: "This is off my radar
screen, these are just a few criminals." You have to bring people over to the
victims. You’ve got to deal with outrage. When people meet a criminal through a
story and then meet the victims and see what really helps victims to heal and what
doesn’t help victims to heal, at the end of it many people are crying. Even though they
know the person has done a terrible crime, the experience of the dignity of a
human being is there, also. That’s why it was so hard to kill Karla Faye
Tucker, because so many people met her on Larry King Live. You could see this was a
loving woman. Yet the only thing we knew to do was freeze-frame her in the
worst act of her life, judge her by that act—and kill her.
The death penalty is not a peripheral issue about what to do about a few criminals who
have done terrible crimes. It epitomizes the three deepest wounds in our
society that we need to attend to and heal. The first wound is racism, because
the criminal justice system is permeated with racism—starting with who is a victim, and
who cares. When white people are killed that is always considered the greatest crime in
this country. So 85 percent of the people chosen for death are there because they killed
white people. A recent study in Pennsylvania shows that racism also shows up in the
disproportionate punishment given people of color who do the same crimes that white
people do.
The second wound is the assault on the poor . It is not an accident that
the thirty-six hundred people selected for death in this country are all poor. They don’t
have the resources to get a Johnny Cochran defense team. It is not an equal
playing field when they go into court. Supposedly, in our adversarial system, you
have the prosecution and you have the defense. The jury is going to listen to arguments
from both sides and make a decision. But all the resources are on the prosecution side
and when the defense comes in, they can rarely prevail. We consider it poor people’s
individual deficiency that accounts for their poverty. In Europe they have much more
of a social sense. If crime begins to proliferate they ask, "What are we doing wrong
as a society?" They look at the fabric. They look at the soil. In America we think,
"That apple is bad, get another barrel, burn the bad apples."
That is why I don’t consider execution a peripheral issue; I consider it central to the
social fabric of our country, and an act of profound despair. We don’t know what
else to do, so we imitate criminals’ worst possible behavior. We kill
people who kill other people because we say, "You don’t deserve to live a life. You
aren’t human the way the rest of us are, so you are disposable." It’s a very
dangerous, pernicious attitude. It leads to the death of our citizens in other
ways, too. You see, the death penalty is very explicit. We take people who are alive
through a process of torture and then kill them.
This begins on a personal level with all of us; we need to be involved in trying to change
what we know is wrong. Consciousness is the first step, and the way that
happened to me was to get to know people. In our society people wear four
sets of gloves. We don’t touch each other. We avoid certain
neighborhoods. We never go to prisons. Death row is far away from us. We
never see criminals—they are distant from us. So it is easy to do anything to them.
Look how quickly that affects how we think and act. Right now a key way for politicians
to get points is to outdo each other in mandating harsh punishments for criminals.
The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld that it is not against the dignity of a human person
to execute them. Amnesty International defines torture as an extreme mental or
physical assault on someone rendered defenseless. Then take a scenario where we hear
of a crime that someone took their victim and kept them locked in a house and told
them, "We are gonna execute you, we are gonna shoot you in the head Tuesday night
at 9:00," and then when it comes to 7:00 they bring the victim out and say, "Not
tonight, another night." And they bring the person back and they wait again, they take
the person out and put the gun to him and say, "Not tonight." And then add to this that
their family is watching while this happens. This is the practice of torture—this is
the death penalty. Some people have been brought to the death chamber just an hour
from death and received a stay of execution—knowing it might happen again.
One of the things I have found that drives the death penalty is people’s concern for
safety: "If we don’t execute them, they are going to get out in a few years
and they are going to kill again." It is important for them to know that most states
have long-term sentences, either life without parole or mandatory long-term sentences
for people who have been convicted of felony murder or first-degree murder. We can
be safe without imitating violence.
Similarly, the death penalty does not make a criminal remorseful.
Remorse personal transformation, empathy, and
has to do with a
compassion, and the ability to experience the victim’s pain and
say, "I am sorry." Some of the people who have committed terrible crimes are
limited in their capacity to empathize with other human beings, because in
their whole life they had never received that kind of love. And death coming at
them does not increase that capacity to feel for others. In fact it can have the opposite
effect, because their life is threatened. Self-preservation kicks in. They wrap around
themselves tighter and have less capacity to love or to feel for others.
Making Way for the Feminine (Jaipur, India, 5-9 Mar. 2008): "Women's Leadership and the
Potential Impact on Society": Rev. Tracey Lind (Trinity Cathedral, USA); Shruti (India), Sister
Jayanti (India/UK); Sister Helen Prejean, author of "Dead Man Walking" which was turned into
Hollywood movie); Ms. Rekha Modi (India).
Making Way for the Feminine (Jaipur, India, 5-9 March 2008): "Strengthening Inner
Resources to Transform Conflict - Listening to Asia": Venerable Daw Succinti (Burma); Mrs.
Surayya Jabeen (Pakistan); Sister Jayanti (India/UK); Mr. Jawad Nader (Afghanistan); Dr.
Sakeena Yacoobi (Afghanistan); Theary Seng (Cambodia); Rev. Dr. Joan Brown Campbell
(GPIW, USA); Mr. Bob Maat (Peace & Reconciliation Coalition, Cambodia/US
My dream is that human rights is what’s going to bring us into the new
the more and more we grow into the sense of our
millennium, that
community, our respect for each other, the dignity of people, that
we can learn much better how to build a society. It comes back to me,
the goodness, and that goodness inspires, energizes. You know how when
Jesus was executed he said, "Father forgive them, they know not what
they are doing?" I really think that that lack of consciousness and awareness is
what makes us so insensitive to each other, and so we do these things to each other. If
we bring people to consciousness and their own best hearts, they will
respond. And so that is what we have to do.
** Please contact us at CIVICUS Cambodia if your newspaper, website, Facebook etc. can
carry this series.
Father John Visser, Theary Seng, Kerry Kennedy, HE Om Yentieng, HE Dr. Kol Pheng, US
Ambassador Carol Rodley, Dr. Kek Galabru, John Heffernan
The RFK Center’s Speak Truth To Power (“Courage Without Borders”) project in
Cambodia is funded by The Charitable Foundation (Australia). For more information,
please visit: www.civicus-cam.org and www.rfkcenter.org/sttp.