100%(1)100% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (1 Abstimmung)
7K Ansichten61 Seiten
A perfect hedge is one that completely eliminates the hedger's ri k. Under what circumstances does a minimum variance hedge lead to no hedging at all? the optimal hedge ratio for a three-month contract is imagine you are hedging for three months.
A perfect hedge is one that completely eliminates the hedger's ri k. Under what circumstances does a minimum variance hedge lead to no hedging at all? the optimal hedge ratio for a three-month contract is imagine you are hedging for three months.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Verfügbare Formate
Als PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
A perfect hedge is one that completely eliminates the hedger's ri k. Under what circumstances does a minimum variance hedge lead to no hedging at all? the optimal hedge ratio for a three-month contract is imagine you are hedging for three months.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Verfügbare Formate
Als PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
Problem 3.2
Explain what is meant by basis risk when futures contracts are used for hedaing
Basis risk arises from the hodger’s uncertainty as to tho difference between the spot
price and futures priee at the expiration of the hedge.
Problem 3.3.
Bxplain what is meant by a yerfect hedge. Does a perfect hedge always lead to a better
outcome tan an imperfect hedge? Explain your answer
A porfect hedge 's ono that complotely eliminates the hedgor’s risk. A porfoet: hodgo
does nat always lead to a better outcome than an imperfoct hedge. Tt just leads to a more
certain outcome. Consider a company that hedges its exposure to the price of an asset.
Suppose the asset's price movements prove to be favorable to the company, A perfect ledge
totally neutralizes the company’s gain from these favorable price movements. Am imperfect
hhodge, which only partially neutralizes the gains, might well give a better outcome.
Problem 8.
Under what circumstances does a minimum-variance hedge portiolio lead to no hedg-
ing at all?
A minimum variance hedge leads to no hedging when tho coefliciont af corrvlation
Dotwoon the futures price changes and changes in the price of the assot being hedged is
Problem 3.5.
Give three reasons that the treasurer of a company might not hedge the company’s
exposure to a particular risk:
(a) If the company’s competitors aro not hedging, the troasnrer might foel that the
company will experience less risk fit dors not hecige. (See Table 3.1.) (b) The shareholders
might not want the company to hedge. (c) Hf there is a loss on the hedge and a gain from
the company's exposure to the underlying asset, the treasurer might feel that he or she
will have difficulty justifying the hedging to other executives within the organization,
Problem 3.6.
‘Suppose that the standard deviation of quarterly changes in the prices of a commodity
4s $0.65, the standard deviation of quartcrly changes in a futures price on the commodity
'9 80.81, and the coefficient of correlation between the two changes is 0.8. What is the
‘optimal ledge ratio for « three-month contract? What does it mean?
Tho optimal hedge ratio is
0.05
osx ON = 00aProblem 3.11.
Imagine you are tho treasurer of a Japanese company exporting electronic equipment
to the United States, Discuss how you would design a foreign exchange hedging strategy
and te arguments you would use to sell the strategy to your fellow executives.
The simple answer to this question is that the treasurer should (a) estimate the com-
pany’s future cosh flows in Japanese yen and U.S. dollars and (b) enter into forward and
futures contracts to lock in the exchange rate for the U.S. dollar cash flows.
However, this is not the whole siory. As the gold jewelry example in Table 3.1 shows,
the company should examine whether the magnitudes of the foreign cosh flows depend on
the exchange rate. For example, will the company be able to raise the price of its product
in US. dollars if tho yon approciates? If the company ean do so, its foreign exchange
exposure may be quite low. The key estimates required are those showing the overall
effect on the company’s profitability of changes in the exchange rate at various times in
the future. Once these estimates have been produced the company can choose between
using fatures and options to hodgo its risk. ‘The results of the analysia should be proaonted
carefully to other executives. Tt should be explained that a hedge does not ensure that
profits will be higher. Tt means that profit will be more certain. When futures/forwards
are used both the downside and upside are eliminated. With options a presiuin is paid
to eliminate only the downside.
Problem 8.12.
Suppose that in Example 3.2 of Section 3.3 the company docides to use a hedge ratio
of 0.8. How does the decison affect the way in which the hedge is implemented and the
result?
If the hedge ratio is 0.8, the company takes a long position in 16 NYM Deces
futures contracts on June 8 when the futures price is $68.00. It closes out its posi
November 10. The spot price and futures price at this time are $70.00 and $69.10. ‘The
gain on the futures position is
(69.10 — 68.00) x 16, 000 = 17, 600
‘The effective cost of the oll Is therefore
20,000 x 70 ~ 17, 600 = 1, 382, 400
or $69.12 per barrel. (This compares with $68.90 per barrel when the company is fully
hedged.)Problem 3.13.
“If the minimum-variance hedge ratio is calculated as 1.0, the hedge must be perfect.”
Js this statement true? Explain your answer.
‘The statement is not true. The minimum variance hedge ratio is
It 15 1.0 when p= 0.5 and ag = 2ap. Since p < 1.0 the hedge is clearly not perfect.
Problem 3.14.
‘If there is no basis risk, tho minimum variance hedge ratio is always 1.0.” Is this
statement true? Fxplain your answer.
‘The statement is true, Using the notation in the text, if the hedge ratio is 1.0, the
hedger locks in a price of F; + by. Since both F) and by are known this has a variance of
zero and must be the best hedge
Problem 3.16.
“For an asset where futures prices are usually less than spot prices, long: hedges are
likely to be particularly attractive.” Explain this statement.
A company that knows it will purchase a commodity in the future is able to lock in a
price close to the futures price. This is likely to be particularly attractive when the futures
price is less than the spot price
Problem 3.16.
‘The standard deviation of montiily changes ia the spot price of live cattle Is (In cents
per pound) 1.2. The standard deviation of monthly changes in the futures price of live
cattle for the closest contract is 14. ‘The correlation between the futures price changes
and the spot price changes Is 0.7, Tt is now October 15. A beef producer is committed to
purchasing 200,000 pounds of live cattie on November 15. The producer wants to use the
December live-cattle futures contracts to hedge its risk. Bach contract is for the delivery
of 40,000 pounds of cattle. What strategy should the beef producer follow?
‘The optimal hedge ratio is
ox? -p6
ia
‘The beef producer requires a long position in 200000 x 0.6 = 120,000 Ibs of cattle. ‘The
beef producer should therefore take a long position in 8 December contracts closing out
the position on November 15.