Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1
“The will to do, the tenacity to
overcome all obstacles and to
finish the course, the strength to
cling to inexorable ideals, are all
2
rooted in courage”
J Edgar Hoover
Introduction
Thank you.
This portfolio is a representation of several years of study in the field of
experiential education and the management of recreation focused programs. I
appreciate you taking the time to familiarize yourself with my past experience
and work.
Within the portfolio you find examples that demonstrate a level of knowledge
and understanding within my field of study. Additionally, the following pages
contain my current professional resume, climbing resumes, and additional
examples of my past work.
Best Regards,
Bryan Hendrick
3
“a ship is safe in harbor, but that
4 is not what ships are built for.”
William Shedd
Table of Contents
Professional Resume 8
Cover Letter 9
Resume 10
Certifications 11
Fact Sheet 12
Senior Internship 64
Rationale for Placement 65
Internship Goals 66
Artifacts 67
Professional Life 86
General Summary of Internship 87
Evaluation of Internship 88
5
“The important thing is not to win, but to take part.
The important thing in life is not the triumph but the
struggle. The essential thing is not to have
conquered but to have fought well.”
Anonymous
6
Professional
Resume
Academic and Professional Information
7
Professional Resume
Cover Letter.
Bryan Hendrick
7034 128th Street Ct
Apple Valley, MN 55124
Best Regards,
--
Bryan Hendrick
Tel: 952.356.2959
Email: bryan.hendrick@utah.edu
8
Professional Resume
Resume.
Education
University of Utah
Parks Recreation and Tourism: Adventure and Outdoor Programing, May 2011
Apple Valley High School
High School Diploma, June 2006
Experience
Outward Bound USA, Instructor, May 2010 to Present.
Facilitate adventure based courses that inspire character development, leadership, self-discovery, and service.
Outward Bound USA, Winter Program Intern, December 2010 to March 2011.
Support the facilitation of winter course delivery, complete a variety of administrative tasks ranging from Human
Resources to Land Management and Logistics.
University of Utah, Associate Instructor, January 2009 to Present.
Instruct courses where students learn technical skills related to climbing and mountaineering.
Park City Mountain Resort, Ski Instructor, Winter 2008 through 2010.
Instruct children ranging from 5 1/2 to 15 in Signature Five group lessons, group sizes ranging from 1 to 5 students.
Buck Hill Ski School, Ski Instructor, Winter 2005 though 2008.
Instructor children and adults of all abilities and ages. Group size ranging from 1 to 15 students.
Ski
-Wapata Icefield Traverse - British Columbia, Canada
-Pfeifferhorn, North West Couloir, - Wasatch, UT
-Mount Superior, South East Face - Wasatch, UT
-Mount Rainier, Colwitz Headwall - Cascades, WA
-Mount Baker, Coleman Glacier - Cascades, WA
Certifications
-AMGA Certified Single Pitch Instructor -Wilderness First Responder
-PSIA Alpine Level 1 -PSIA Alpine Level 1 ACE
-AIARE Level 2 -Leave No Trace Trainer
9
Professional Resume
Certifications.*
American Mountain Guide Association
Single Pitch Instructor, May 2010.
Leave No Trace
Trainer, August 2008.
10
Professional Resume
Fact sheet.
Rock Climbing
Areas Climbed in; Taylor Falls MN, Shovel Point MN, Big and Little Cottonwood
Canyon UT, Moab UT, Indian Creek UT, Red Rocks NV, American Fork UT,
Independence Pass CO, Rock Mountain National Park CO, City of Rocks ID.
Personal Expeditions
Wapta Icefield Traverse w/ numerous peaks (w/o huts), 8 days. January 2010.
11
“a society grows great when
old men plant trees whose
shade they know they shall
never sit in.”
-Greek Proverb
12
Samples from
Studies
Examples of knowledge and understanding within Parks, Recreation and Tourism
13
Samples
Program Planning and Delivery.
TAKE ME OUTSIDE!
Take Me Outside was an after school program in which we gave the children from the 3rd and
4th grades at Freemont Elementary school an opportunity to not only play outside, but also to
learn important concepts concerning the environment. Our main purpose aimed to inspire
children to go outdoors and develop a better appreciate for the world around us. This sample
includes a through description of the planning for various lessons, the delivery of various
activities, and a basic evaluation of the effectiveness of the program design.
This piece demonstrates the knowledge and understanding gained in program planning and
delivery. It clearly shows an ability to design and articulate lessons, taking into account risk
management, and resources. Most importantly it demonstrates an ability to create objectives
and determine if a lesson is adding in the attainment of the objective.
To be able to deliver this program, a facilitator needs to have an overall progression in mind.
Without the intentional facilitation of any lesson, an activity simply becomes an activity. Within
the field of experiential education, this is a critical understanding in effectively delivering any
program.
14
TAKE ME OUTSIDE!
Introduc)on
Bryan
Hendrick,
Rhielle
Whetten,
Kalee
Whipple
Take
Me
Outside
was
our
after
school
program
in
which
we
gave
the
children
from
the
3rd
and
4th
grades
at
Freemont
Elementary
school
an
opportunity
to
not
only
play
outside,
but
also
to
learn
important
concepts
concerning
the
environment.
Our
main
purpose
of
this
program
was
to
in
the
end
have
the
children
gain
a
desire
to
go
outdoors
and
develop
a
better
appreciate
for
the
world
around
us.
We
hoped
to
do
this
by
introducing
the
children
to
activities,
other
than
the
originals,
that
most
have
never
had
the
opportunity
to
participate
in.
Also,
to
instill
the
concept
of
appreciation
we
gave
repeated
lessons
of
Leave
No
Trace.
Take
Me
Outside
was
a
program
that
kept
kids
active,
but
also
taught
important
lessons.
This
Iit
into
the
YMCA
philosophy
of
build
strong
kids,
strong
families
and
communities
perfect.
With
taking
the
kids
outside
we
encouraged
them
to
build
strong
bodies
and
to
be
healthy.
The
activities
we
taught
were
not
ones
to
be
just
used
as
a
single
person
activity,
they
were
taught
to
encourage
kids
to
get
outside
and
do
these
activities
with
their
families.
With
the
lessons
taught
about
appreciating
and
respecting
the
environment
we
encouraged
the
children
to
take
these
things
into
their
communities
and
make
them
a
better
place.
Each
idea
we
had
coincided
with
the
YMCA’s
philosophy.
We
felt
as
a
group
that
our
program,
Take
Me
Outside,
was
an
overall
success.
15
TAKE ME OUTSIDE!
3.1_Ac)vity
Plans
Bryan
Hendrick,
Rhielle
Whetten,
Kalee
Whipple
Anima)on
Plan
Intro
to
Activity
As
the
session
begins,
participants
will
group
up
on
the
steps
on
the
stage
and
the
facilitators
will
review
the
rules.
After
Iirst
week,
facilitators
will
ask
participants
what
the
rules
are,
rather
than
lecturing
them
on
the
rules
each
and
every
week.
Following
this,
the
facilitators
will
review
with
the
participants
the
previous
week’s
activity.
Asking
question
that
facilitate
discussion,
such
as:
do
you
remember
what
we
did
last
week?
What
was
you
favorite
part?
Do
you
remember
what
you
learned?
Following
the
review
the
day’s
activity
will
be
introduced.
Highlight
things
the
participants
will
want
to
think
about
as
they
participate.
This
time
will
be
used
to
set
the
tone
for
the
rest
of
the
day.
And
possible
discussion
might
be
used
to
bring
participants
into
the
mindset
of
that
particular
days
activity.
Activity
From
the
introduction
of
the
activity
participants
will
then
be
moved
from
the
stage
steps
to
the
location
for
the
activity
to
take
place.
From
here
the
facilitators
will
direct
the
activity.
See
the
Activity
Cards
for
more
details.
After
the
activity
has
taken
place,
a
discussion
will
be
facilitated
with
the
participants.
It
should
focus
on
the
main
points
of
the
activity.
For
example
if
the
activity
was
based
around
the
LNT
principal
of
“leave
what
you
Iind,”
the
facilitators
will
ask
question
such
as:
What
will
you
do
differently
when
you
go
to
a
park?
Do
you
think
it
is
important
to
leave
things
how
we
Iind
them?
Why?
Next
tickets,
provided
by
the
YMCA,
will
be
given
out
to
participants
based
on
whether
or
not
the
followed
the
rules
and
were
helpful
in
create
a
sense
of
time
and
place
for
the
days
activity.
Homework
Once
the
activity
session
has
been
closed
all
the
participants
will
be
transfer
to
the
homework
area,
and
supervision
will
be
taken
over
by
the
local
YMCA
staff.
16
TAKE ME OUTSIDE!
Ac)vity
Cards
Ac)vity
Title:
Wildlife
Tracking:
Make
them
yourself
Theme:
Wildlife
Purpose:
To
have
fun
while
demonstrating
some
knowledge
about
different
animals
and
their
tracks
Objectives:
Students
will
demonstrate
knowledge
of
tracks
by
making
their
own
tracks.
Assessment:
Seeing
students
use
the
knowledge
that
they
were
just
given
to
make
their
own
tracks
is
the
assessment.
Equipment/Materials:
•
Butcher
Paper
or
Big
Plastic
Sheet,
OR
Snow
or
Sandbox
•
Something
to
leave
a
track:
Mud
or
Paint
•
Bread
bags
or
Grocery
Bags
for
feet
•
Rubber
bands
for
putting
bags
on
feet
Formation/Space:
If
we
are
inside,
we
will
need
to
use
straight
lines
and
give
everyone
their
own
“bowling
alley”
to
make
tracks
in.
If
we
get
to
do
this
outside
in
the
snow,
creating
boundaries
to
stay
inside
of
will
be
key.
Procedure:
Opening:
Now
we
get
to
use
our
imagination
and
pretend
that
we
are
animals
leaving
tracks
in
the
snow.
We
will
be
making
tracks
of
the
animals
that
we
just
learned
about.
Explanation:
Everyone
will
step
into
this
big
box
of
mud.
Then
you
will
step
out
of
it
and
stand
on
your
spot.
You
must
hold
still
or
you
will
run
out
of
mud
before
you
get
to
make
tracks.
Then,
once
everyone
is
ready,
we
will
call
out
the
name
of
an
animal,
and
everyone
will
make
tracks
just
like
that
animal
would
and
race
to
the
other
end
of
the
plastic
sheet.
If
you
run
off
of
the
plastic
sheet,
you
will
not
get
to
play
the
game
anymore.
Closure:
Using
clean-‐up
time
as
a
cool-‐down
is
a
great
time
to
wind
the
kids
down.
Once
the
kids
have
cleaned
up,
it
is
a
good
time
to
recap
what
we
have
learned
about.
Where
animals
live,
and
why?
What
do
their
tracks
look
like?
How
else
might
we
know
that
they
were
there?
Safety
Factors:
The
mud
and
the
plastic
leave
room
for
little
friction
and
can
be
very
slippery.
Making
sure
the
students
take
their
time
and
make
good
tracks
will
be
important
here!
Also
making
sure
that
this
does
not
become
an
extremely
messy
activity
is
important.
ModiIications:
To
change
the
activity,
we
could
ask
them
to
paint
the
track
with
their
Iingers
and
make
it
as
accurate
as
possible.
To
make
it
easier,
we
may
just
ask
for
pattern
identiIication
and
just
have
them
make
a
pattern
similar
to
the
one
the
animal
makes.
17
TAKE ME OUTSIDE!
Ac)vity
Title:
Wildlife
Tracking:
Viewing
Theme:
Wildlife
Purpose:
To
expose
children
to
the
footprints
that
they
leave
behind.
Also
give
kids
the
knowledge
needed
to
make
an
educated
guess
as
to
what
animal
left
its
track
behind.
Objectives:
•
Students
will
be
able
to
identify
wildlife
tracks
•
Students
will
use
identiIication
knowledge
to
distinguish
the
animal
that
the
track
came
from
Assessment:
The
assessment
will
come
when
the
students
make
their
own
tracks
in
the
next
activity.
During
that
activity,
students
will
be
asked
to
make
tracks
like
a
snowshoe
hare,
a
deer,
a
bird,
etc.
Equipment/Materials:
•
Pictures
of
wild
animal
tracks
•
Examples
of
wild
animal
tracks?????
•
Hands
•
Tub
of
Mud
or
Sandbox
•
Bread
bags
for
shoes
or
hands
Procedure:
Opening:
Now
we
are
going
to
use
our
detective
skills
again.
We
are
going
to
look
for
wildlife
evidence.
Who
has
a
dog?
What
kind
of
evidence
does
a
dog
leave
behind?
(Scat,
fur,
footprints,
nest)
Ask
questions
about
footprints.
What
is
a
footprint?
What
does
a
footprint
look
like?
What
kind
of
evidence
does
a
footprint
leave
behind?
What
can
we
learn
from
a
footprint
about
an
animal?
What
about
a
track?
What
can
we
learn
from
a
track?
Explanation:
Now
we
are
going
to
look
at
some
tracks
that
are
from
animals.
We
are
going
to
use
our
detective
skills
to
Iigure
out
what
kind
of
animal
left
its
tracks
and
where
it
was
going.
During
this
part,
we
will
use
a
tub
of
mud
to
make
some
tracks
and
discuss
how
using
size,
depth,
pattern,
and
shape
can
help
determine
which
animal
left
the
track
and
which
direction
they
were
going.
Closure:
What
are
the
main
things
that
we
learned
about
tracks?
Now
let’s
go
make
some
tracks
of
our
own!
Safety
Factors:
If
we
can
do
this
outside,
the
weather
is
the
main
safety
factor.
Also,
making
sure
all
of
the
kids
stay
together
and
are
not
running
all
over
the
playground.
If
the
activity
is
done
inside,
making
sure
all
of
the
students
can
see
and
are
participating
and
feel
comfortable
to
participate
is
key.
Variations:
Give
less
information
for
older
people,
give
more
information
for
younger
people.
18
TAKE ME OUTSIDE!
Ac)vity
Title:
Where
Do
Animals
Live?
Theme:
Wildlife
Tracking
Purpose:
To
educate
students
about
the
habitats
of
animals,
where
they
live,
and
why.
Objective:
•
Students
will
be
able
to
identify
some
common
animals
along
the
Wasatch
front.
•
Students
will
be
able
to
place
common
Wasatch
wildlife
in
the
correct
habitat.
•
Students
will
be
able
to
identify
a
reason
why
an
animal
thrives
in
a
speciIic
habitat.
Assessment:
After
the
activity
has
Iinished,
students
will
have
a
paper
with
many
habitats
on
it.
The
students
will
glue
animals
onto
the
paper
in
the
correct
habitat.
Equipment/Materials:
•
Fabric
Mountain
and
City
that
represents
habitats
of
different
animals
•
Pictures
of
recognizable
wildlife
to
be
placed
onto
the
fabric
mountain
•
Paper
with
the
“habitat”
printed
on
it
•
Smaller
pictures
of
the
animals
to
be
glued
onto
the
paper
•
Glue
Procedure:
Opening:
Has
anyone
ever
seen
a
wild
animal?
What
kinds
of
animals
have
you
seen
or
heard
of?
When
the
students
start
to
name
animals,
we
can
take
the
picture
of
that
animal
and
put
it
on
the
Iloor
in
front
of
them
as
an
example.
Today
we
are
going
to
talk
about
where
the
animals
live.
If
they
live
in
the
city,
in
the
snow,
in
the
trees,
in
the
mountains,
or
where
else
an
animal
will
live.
Depending
on
the
age
group
of
the
children,
there
may
need
to
be
some
discussion
about
what
a
home
is,
what
it
means
to
live
in
a
home.
Explanation:
Today
we
are
going
to
be
detectives.
We
are
on
a
mission
to
Iind
out
where
these
hidden
animals
live,
what
they
eat,
where
they
sleep
and
all
those
other
things
that
make
a
home.
We
will
then
proceed
to
name
wild
animals,
create
a
place
for
them
that
is
a
home,
and
give
reasons
for
why
they
live
where
they
do.
For
example,
a
deer
does
not
live
in
the
tops
of
the
mountains
because
it
is
hard
to
Iind
food
in
the
winter.
A
mountain
goat
lives
in
rocky
areas
and
on
cliff
edges
so
that
they
are
not
easily
accessible
by
predators,
etc.
As
an
animal
is
talked
about,
we
will
place
the
animal
in
their
correct
habitat
for
the
winter
on
the
fabric
mountain.
Closure:
Reinforce
where
the
animals
live
by
helping
students
create
their
own
habitat
with
glue
and
paper.
Also,
talking
about
a
home
again
in
regards
to
where
the
students
live
and
their
habitat
and
what
they
can
do
to
keep
their
habitat
clean
just
like
the
animals
do.
Depending
on
the
age
group,
this
discussion
can
be
modi:ied
to
be
more
in
depth.
19
TAKE ME OUTSIDE!
Safety
Factors:
The
biggest
safety
factor
is
emotional.
If
there
is
a
foster
child
in
the
group
that
does
not
feel
that
they
have
a
home
or
a
child
who
is
actually
homeless,
this
activity
may
be
especially
emotionally
unsound.
Variations:
With
more
time
or
an
older
group,
you
could
discuss
where
animals
live
in
the
summer
v.
the
winter.
Also,
you
can
go
into
much
more
depth
with
animal
adaptations
and
the
reasons
why
certain
animals
adapt
to
certain
habitats
while
other
animals
can’t.
20
TAKE ME OUTSIDE!
speciIic
on
telling
the
children
that
they
need
to
not
run
and
can
play
slow.
Also
students
need
to
be
very
careful
with
the
beacons
in
hand.
Variations:
This
activity
is
one
that
can
be
very
adaptable
depending
on
the
age,
abilities,
and
weather.
The
activities
can
be
done
both
inside
and
out.
Depending
on
the
kids
ages
and
abilities
will
depend
on
the
depth
that
we
as
the
instructors
will
go
into
on
the
beacon
aspect
of
the
activity.
Objectives:
To
stimulate
thought
on
how
one’s
behavior
in
the
backcountry,
or
front
country,
could
have
a
negative
impact
on
the
next
visitor.
Assessment:
Through
discussion
and
feedback,
a
sense
of
transfer
will
be
developed
for
the
participants
into
their
everyday
life.
Explanation:
Each
individual
will
draw
his
or
her
experience
on
the
brown
craft
paper.
Since
there
is
not
a
lot
of
time,
students
need
to
be
encouraged
to
draw
fast,
but
well.
As
students
wrap
up,
they
will
be
broken
up
into
one
of
three
groups.
Groups
will
be
taken
into
another
room.
Each
group
will
get
a
puzzle
that
they
must
put
together.
Puzzle
#1
is
almost
complete,
missing
2-‐3
pieces.
Puzzle
#2
is
missing
even
more
pieces.
And
Puzzle
#3
is
missing
the
most
pieces,
5-‐6
pieces
at
most.
After
each
21
TAKE ME OUTSIDE!
group
attempts
to
complete
their
puzzle,
they
share
a
“story”
from
their
particular
puzzle
with
the
entire
group.
It
becomes
very
difIicult
to
tell
the
“story”
when
more
and
more
pieces
are
missing.
While
students
where
working
on
their
puzzles,
the
facilitator(s)
has
taken
a
few
moments
to
“vandalize”
them
by
tearing
the
paper,
writing
of
around
drawings,
etc…
Bring
the
participants
back
into
the
room
where
the
brown
craft
paper
is
and
ask
them
how
they
feel
about
the
vandalism
that
occurred
while
they
where
gone.
Closure:
Wrap
up
with
a
light
discussion
about
how
the
participants
felt
and
stress
the
principle
of
Leave
What
You
Find.
Cut
out
the
participants
drawings
from
the
brown
craft
paper
–
none
of
which
should
have
been
“directly”
vandalized.
Safety
Factors:
The
way
in
which
the
artwork
is
vandalized
–
keeping
a
sense
of
emotional
safety
intact
for
the
participants.
Variations:
Amount
of
pieces
in
each
puzzle.
The
type
of
“WOW”
experiences
being
drawn,
possibly
sticking
to
rock
art.
Objectives:
Participants
will
learn
how
to
use
basic
symbols
on
the
map,
and
how
to
relate
them
to
the
environment
they
are
in.
Formation
&
Space:
The
2
cones
need
to
be
placed
in
relation
to
the
maps,
on
the
north
end
of
the
playground.
SEE
MAPS.
22
TAKE ME OUTSIDE!
Explanation:
We
are
going
to
have
to
travel
along
our
maps,
looking
at
the
different
feature
on
the
map,
and
what
we
see
in
real
life.
First,
give
everyone
the
same
map,
and
walk
the
group
through
as
a
whole,
after
which,
everyone
will
rotate
though
subsequent
maps
–
going
different
directions
each
time.
Make
sure
that
the
participants
know
that
they
can
ask
for
assistance.
Make
sure
to
reinforce
teamwork
and
each
individual’s
input
while
proceeding
along
each
step.
Closure:
What
was
hard?
What
was
easy?
What
do
you
see
along
your
hike?
Safety
Factors:
Remind
them
to
be
careful
about
running
into
one
another
and
other
things.
“You
can
look
at
the
map
–
but
don’t
just
focus
on
it
while
you’re
walking.”
Variations:
Use
a
compass
and
bearings
to
maneuver
around
the
course.
Use
different
color
string
to
“highlight”
the
course
-‐
giving
younger
children
assistance
with
traveling
thru
the
course.
Map
Guidelines:
Whenever
at
a
cone
the
group
stops
and
is
asked
a
step
on
it
question,
follow
up
with
why…
Map #2: Speed up the game, how fast can the group move
Map
#3:
There
are
two
options
from
the
tree
(playground
or
cone),
allow
the
group
to
decide
–
but
encourage
them
to
look
at
the
path
they
must
take.
This
map
should
be
repeated,
and
to
opposite
route
taken
the
second
time.
23
TAKE ME OUTSIDE!
3.2
Par)cipant
and
Program
Evalua)on
Bryan
Hendrick,
Rhielle
Whetten,
Kalee
Whipple
The
goals
and
objectives
that
we
had
set
for
the
class
were
based
on
our
club
name.
Take
Me
Outside,
as
well
as
our
organization’s
mission
to
create
kids
with
healthy
minds,
bodies,
and
spirits.
The
Iinal
version
of
our
goals
and
objectives
are
as
follow.
The
questions
included
in
our
evaluation
were
designed
to
make
sure
the
students
enjoyed
participating
in
activities
as
well
as
accomplished
our
goals.
The
following
is
a
summary
of
our
participant
evaluations.
The
evaluation
was
completed
by
six
of
our
participants.
24
TAKE ME OUTSIDE!
Were
the
leaders
fun?
This
question
was
also
graded
on
a
happy
face,
sad
face
scale.
All
of
the
participants
indicated
a
happy
face.
This
demonstrates
enthusiasm
and
excitement
on
behalf
of
all
three
facilitators.
25
TAKE ME OUTSIDE!
3.3
Facilitator
Evalua)on
Bryan
Hendrick
Rhielle
WheSen
Preparation
–
In
every
regard
Rhielle
was
highly
prepared
for
all
of
our
meetings
are
facilitations.
Contribution
–
In
our
group
discussions
Rhielle
provided
a
great
amount
of
structure
that
helped
us
as
a
group
complete
many
of
the
tasks
at
hand.
Additionally,
she
completed
her
own
work
for
the
group
on
time
if
not
early.
Respect
for
others
–
Rhielle
is
very
encouraging
for
everyone
in
the
group,
she
provide
thoughtful
insight
Flexibility
–
When
she
did
not
agree
with
another
person,
she
was
very
good
at
positive
feedback
with
other
possible
solutions
or
compromises.
Dependable
–
Rhielle
was
present
at
every
group
meeting,
and
after
school
session.
Kalee
Whipple
Preparation
–
Every
meeting
Kalee
attended
she
was
ready
and
willing
to
contribute
to
the
group.
Contribution
–
Kalee
contributed
in
numerous
ways
to
the
group
work,
providing
a
number
of
insights.
And
while
her
schedule
was
busy,
she
completed
all
of
her
contributions
to
the
group
on
time.
Respect
for
others
–
In
group
meetings
and
the
afterschool
sessions,
Kalee
provided
to
be
a
valuable
part
of
the
team.
Providing
positive
feedback
and
role
modeling.
Flexibility
–
In
the
case
of
disagreements
Kalee
had
a
positive
attitude,
and
provided
numerous
options.
Dependable
–
Kalee
was
very
dependable.
While
her
schedule
kept
her
from
a
couple
of
meetings
and
facilitations,
she
communicated
well
in
advance
when
there
were
conIlicts.
Additionally,
Kalee
made
up
for
it
by
staying
in
contact
and
working
on
group
work
as
much
as
possible
while
on
the
road.
26
TAKE ME OUTSIDE!
3.4
Reflec)on
Bryan
Hendrick
Programming
for
an
After-‐school
program
is
a
Iirst
for
me
in
numerous
ways.
In
my
previous
experience,
ski
instructing
is
as
close
as
it
comes.
While
there
are
similarities
in
the
management
of
the
children,
the
largest
difference
is
that
of
programming
itself.
Which,
in
many
regards
took
some
getting
used
to
for
myself.
No
longer
did
I
Iind
myself
working
towards
goals
and
objectives
determined
within
the
Iirst
few
runs
of
a
lesson,
I
was
working
weeks
in
advance.
In
some
regards,
not
knowing
and
having
a
chance
to
meet
the
participants
was
frustrating
and
limiting.
Even
more
so
was
the
initial
feeling
of
being
placed
in
a
box.
No
longer
was
I
free
to
teach
and
facilitate
an
experience
at
the
pace
of
the
group,
with
the
unrestricting
freedom
of
an
entire
mountainside.
Rather
I
found
myself
working
with
the
conIines
of
four
walls.
Participation,
essentially
the
key
component
in
being
a
participant.
While
many
of
the
children
did
desire
to
be
there
and
learn
from
the
activities
we
had
programmed,
there
were
the
inevitable
tough
kids.
While
rambunctious
behaviors
can
be
managed,
I
found
myself
digging
deep
into
my
“tool-‐box”
trying
to
get
several
participants
each
week
internally
motivated.
This
proved
to
be
the
new
learning
experience
for
me.
Never
before
have
I
worked
with
participants
that
show
such
a
large
amount
of
little
to
no
interest,
truly
having
no
internal
motivation
to
be
present.
Challenging
group
dynamics
and
behaviors
testing
the
way
in
which
I
facilitate,
proved
to
create
an
interesting
and
dynamic
learning
environment
for
myself.
Highlighting
the
skills
that
are
essential
to
be
successful,
and
the
techniques
that
simply
do
not
transfer
from
the
mountain
to
the
gym.
Our
club
had
an
outdoor
focus,
with
a
leave
no
trace
spin,
leaving
us
with
a
fun,
and
educational
environment
for
the
participants
to
learn
within.
Programming
each
week
to
build
on
top
of
previous
weeks.
While
some
weeks
were
harder
than
others
to
achieve
this
goal,
it
proved
to
create
the
desired
outcomes
set
forth
by
our
goals
and
objectives.
The
Iirst
week
was
a
rather
simplistic
in
nature,
introduce
the
participants
to
avalanches,
and
avalanche
beacons.
The
activity
was
a
simple
game
of
hide-‐and-‐seek.
Stating
off
with
“beacon
groups”
hiding,
eventually
burying
a
beacon
in
a
bag
somewhere
within
the
playground.
The
second
week
while
a
little
disconnected
was
based
of
the
leave
no
trace
principal
of
leave
what
you
Iind.
Each
participant
created
wall
art,
and
while
playing
with
puzzles,
there
art
was
vandalized
–
and
a
very
mature
discussion
ensued
about
why
the
vandalism
happened
and
why
we
should
leave
things
how
we
Iind
them.
Our
third
week
focused
on
maps,
getting
students
to
translate
what
they
were
seeing
on
the
map
to
the
world
around
them.
Finally,
our
program
ended
in
an
engaging
combined
activity
with
a
special
visitor
from
the
Hawk
watch.
The
experience
of
programming
and
facilitating
an
afterschool
program
has
been
very
informative.
I
found
that
in
working
with
this
age
range
many
of
the
same
techniques
are
used
across
the
board
from
a
ski
instructing
position
to
after
school
27
TAKE ME OUTSIDE!
facilitator.
One
of
which
is
the
reminder
of
rules
at
the
beginning
of
each
day,
and
subsequent
reminders
as
needed.
In
addition
to
the
reminder
of
rules,
I
found
taking
children
in
the
mountain
environment
with
the
challenge
of
two
skis
attached
to
their
feet
made
them
more
liable
to
be
rambunctious
and
all
around
require
a
much
different
approach
to
facilitating
activities.
From
this
program
moving
forward,
I
would
possibly
look
for
a
more
Ilowing
overarching
theme.
In
addition
to
this
I
would
look
for
even
more
continuity
week
to
week.
In
regards
to
my
own
leadership,
not
much
if
any
has
changed.
Rather
I
have
found
the
possible
limitations,
and
challenges
when
working
with
younger
age
groups.
My
servant
leadership
style,
I
still
view
as
being
one
of
my
greatest
assets
as
a
leader.
But,
I
do
believe
it
will
work
better
within
the
population
I
wish
to
work
within.
The
experience
in
working
with
the
YMCA
to
provide
a
four-‐week
after
school
program
has
been
a
new
and
rewarding
experience.
There
have
been
a
number
of
new
lessons
I
learned
from
experience,
and
new
dynamic
I
have
learned
to
work
with
in
the
age
range
of
third
and
fourth
grade.
Looking
forward
I
hope
this
experience
to
provide
positive
changes
in
that
way
I
approach
programming
and
working
with
these
ages.
28
TAKE ME OUTSIDE!
3.5
Professional
Resource
List
Bryan
Hendrick
Cary,
Alice.
"Tracking
with
Kids."
GORP.
12
Feb
2009.
<hSp://gorp.away.com/
gorp/eclec)c/family/track_kids.htm>.
This
website
provides
a
general
activity
outline
with
clear
instructions
for
facilitating
tracking
games.
The
games
create
and
instill
a
sense
of
awareness
for
the
environment
in
which
the
children
are
surrounded.
Hopefully,
allowing
them
to
truly
experience
what
the
world
has
to
offer
them
outside.
"The
String
Course."
Orienteering
for
the
Young.
26
Feb
2009.
<hSp://
www.us.orienteering.org/OYoung/index.html>.
Orienteering
for
the
young
explores
orienteering
and
the
modiIications
that
need
to
take
place
for
younger
age
groups.
The
stringcourse
is
a
great
activity
form
that
you
can
create
an
orienteering
activity
from
for
a
limited
time
window.
Bonney,
Bruce,
and
Jack
Drur.
The
Backcountry
Classroom:
Lesson
Plans
for
Teaching
in
the
Wilderness.
1st
ed.
Merrillville,
IN:
ICS
Books,
Inc.,
1992.
While
not
used
directly
in
this
program,
it
has
a
number
of
creative
ideas
for
teaching
numerous
outdoor
themes.
Its
not
the
greatest
Iit
for
an
after
school
program.
Leave
No
Trace
Center
for
Outdoor
Ethics,
101
Ways
to
teach
leave
no
trace.
Boulder,
CO:
Leave
No
Trace
Center
for
Outdoor
Ethics,
2007.
The
activity
book
contains
101
games
for
teaching
every
principal
of
Leave
No
Trace
-‐
including
general
activities.
It
is
a
perfect
tool
when
teaching
LNT
in
any
setting.
Cox,
Steven,
and
Kris
Fulsaas.
Mountaineering:
The
Freedom
of
the
Hills.
7th
ed.
SeaSle,
WA:
The
Mountaineers
Books,
2003.
The
bible
for
mountaineering,
it
contains
factual
information
on
numerous
aspects
of
mountaineering.
Information
for
presenting
activities
can
be
referenced.
29
Samples
Marketing.
Climbing Program Marketing Plan.
The University of Utah Climbing Program facilitates programs associated with the
University. These programs range from rock climbing courses in the Parks, Recreation,
and Tourism department to mountaineering at destinations such as Mount Rainier
through the Outdoor Recreation Program. This sample highlights a marketing plan
created for the program, though it never used.
This piece demonstrates the knowledge and understanding attained in the marketing
of programs. At a minimum it shows an ability to be a useful resource in developing
marketing strategies, and become an asset rather than a burden in such a capacity. By
no means does this sample quantify as commensurate experience. Rather, it is a basic
understanding of the terms and theories used in creating a marketing plan, along with
other marketing strategies.
30
Marketing
Bryan Hendrick
PRT-3211
A. Joseph Arave, Ph.D
April 19, 2010
Introduction
The University of Utah Climbing Program facilitates programs
associated with the University. These programs range from rock climbing
courses in the Parks, Recreation, and Tourism department to
mountaineering at destinations such as Mount Rainier through the
Outdoor Recreation Program. The Climbing Program started in the Fall
semester of 2007, seeing a steady growth in students over the past two
years. The unique relationship between the Parks, Recreation, and Tourism
department and the Outdoor Recreation Program has allowed the
program to offer a unique and rewarding experience for every level of
student.
In the last six months the Climbing Program has been awarded
accreditation from the American Mountain Guides Association, making
the Climbing Program the only university program to hold such an
accreditation. The accreditation serves to provide a standard to which
the program is held. Several areas in which the accreditation focuses
include permits, staff, staff training, and operational guidelines.
Additionally, the accreditation informs students along with the general
public that the program adheres to industry standards, and all instructors
operate in terrain in which they have received formal training to instruct.
Another unique aspect of the Climbing Program, is the relationship it
shares between the Parks, Recreation, and Tourism department and the
Outdoor Recreation Program. The relationship has allowed for a united
effort in providing technical climbing programs at the University of Utah.
This has allowed for the success of the Climbing Program and its ability to
31
Marketing
operate beyond the minimum standards set forth by the international
guiding community.
There are a number of programs offered through the Climbing
Program, a large number are academic courses through the Parks,
Recreation, and Tourism department. However, the Climbing Program
does offer a number of courses through the Outdoor Recreation Program,
not for credit, ranging in length from one day to week long trips. In the
past, trips created the opportunity for students to climb a number of
Cascade Peaks in the Pacific North-West, and weekend ice climbing trips
to Ouray Ice Park in Colorado. Academic courses currently take place in
one of several locations: Wasatch Front, St. George, Moab, and Ourary
Ice Park. Course locations are dependent on the time of year along with
goals and objectives to the specific course.
The population served by the Climbing Program presents a unique
set of challenges. Each program that takes place throughout the year has
a surprising amount of diversity. Initially, white males dominated the
courses; in recent semesters there has been an uptake in white females
and several other demographics. Additionally, the students in each
program have a variety of experience levels regardless of the program
offered. The challenge presented is creating a unique and beneficial
learning environment for all students.
Instructors in the Climbing Program follow the norm within many
outdoor adventure based programs, white female and male instructors.
While there is a lack of diversity within the instructors, there is a large range
in experience when exploring backgrounds within technical climbing and
teaching. The majority of instructors a have experience solely in rock
terrain, and come to the program with little experience teaching.
However, the Climbing Program has an excellent mentorship program in
which instructors have the ability to develop.
The climbing program offers a service rather than a product. Each
semester the service recycles. Any open seats in a course represent an
expired opportunity for revenue. The challenge in the academic setting is
to not only continually grow enrollment, but retain as well. Each student
has the opportunity to drop any climbing course within two days of the
first class meeting. Unfortunately, this results a number of students leaving
a course before it is in the field. Again, this creates open seats. The actual
life of any service offered by the climbing program is rather short: three
days.
Each course is targeted towards as specific segment, the traditional
University student. While there have been a number of other segments
that partake in a course, the majority of targeting is to students between
the ages of eighteen to twenty-four.
32
Marketing
Overall, the Climbing Program creates a unique and rewarding
experience through its programs offered in the Parks, Recreation, and
Tourism department, along with the Outdoor Recreation Program. The
Climbing Program continues to experience growth in the programs
offered.
Promotion
Promoting the climbing course offers a number of advantages,
including more work for instructors that have devoted time to the
program. More specifically, the population of climbers continues to grow
around the University. The need to understand the basic principals in
managing risks associated with climbing is paramount. The more students
who enroll, the more climbers in the community will have a better
understanding of how to manage their risks effectively.
There are several strategies that would prove effective for
promoting the courses offered by the Climbing Program. The first is a push
pull method. To push the courses out to students, vouchers such as those
used for Lift ticket, sold at numerous locations, could be created for
classes. Imagine potential students browsing the local Costco or REI, and
seeing a cardboard display for the climbing courses. With their interest
peaked, they could purchase this voucher to be used on a climbing
course.
The second is personal selling. This requires the attention of all
instructors involved in the climbing program. The ability to promote word
of mouth from one student to the next has a large impact on the
enrollment of students. Potentially, a day of passing out pancakes or hot
chocolate would allow for instructors to interact with prospective students.
Word of mouth would spread the news of free food and the climbing
courses.
33
Marketing
CLIMBING!
Enroll today
climbing.utah.edu
34
Marketing
Advertising, Part 1
To advertise within the targeted market of students attending the
University of Utah requires intentional thought to achieve effective results.
Within the demographics of students that enroll in the climbing program
courses, social media presents an untapped opportunity to extend the
reach of marketing opportunities. Specific websites such as FaceBook,
offer the opportunity for student to upload photos, and write about their
experience. This allows others to interact with the same content and
become aware of the positive experience they to can have by taking a
climbing course.
Initially, the need to create some basic content and group on
FaceBook is necessary. Potentially, videos and other forms of media could
be created. This media would allow students to be “tagged”, causing it to
show up in the “news feed” of other users. Effectively, this would allow for
a word of mouth approach in the digital world.
Advertising, Part 2
The advertising process for the climbing program is quite simplistic,
including several traditional and non-traditional means. The overarching
objectives for advertising the Climbing Program, are to reach over sixty
percent of students that are interested in adventure based activities
increasing their interest in the courses offered by the end of the calendar
year. To achieve this objective, there are two components that need to
be explored: the creative strategy and the media plan.
The creative strategy has several components to consider, the first
of which is the target audience. As discussed previously, the target
audience is made up of students attending the University of Utah
between the ages of eighteen and twenty-four, specifically those
interested in adventure based activities. The second component is the
objective of the marketing effort. Simply stated, the marketing effort will
excite students about climbing for credit at new climbing locations for
them. The third and fourth elements focus on the marketing materials
themselves.
The marketing materials will make use of new media, such as
photos and videos. The videos themselves will make repeated reference
to the credit available. Along with the use of the two mediums, the
materials will have a catchy appeal for those in the target market, making
use of video highlighting the adventure of climbing.
Last, the media plan has components to consider as well. Any effort
in marketing the climbing courses should reach the majority of students
attending the University. It is rather difficult to reach just those within the
35
Marketing
target market. Additionally, the marketing will make use of three mediums
that allow for flexibility in the timing and frequency.
The first medium is that of emails. Bursts can be sent out bi-weekly,
highlighting upcoming courses, and important climbing community news.
The second medium is posters. Bursts can be used at the beginning of
each semester, hanging them around various locations on campus. The
final medium would be a website using videos. Pulse can be used
throughout the semester. Videos will highlight the course offering, and
past experiences of students of recent courses.
Pricing
Unfortunately, for the Climbing Program pricing has little implication
for marketing. The price for a student is rather set by the University.
However, for the purpose of the project I will explore pricing within the
context of a guide service.
Changes in pricing are rather limited. With any guide service, there
are overhead cost that simply have to be covered. Yet, there are ways to
allow for flexibility, and the appearance of promotional offers. For
example, day-to-day services by guides will normally be offered at a
neutral point. One that is at the medium for such a service in the given
region, However, it is possible to offer a much lower price that follows a
more penetration approach. Such a price would apply to those just
looking to try climbing, essentially enticing those thinking about “dipping
their toe in the water.”
Other cost factors that apply to participants most be overcome as
well. The first is time, easily overcome by the flexibility of scheduling. A
client chooses when, where, and for how long. Next, fear may play a role
in the “cost”, providing videos online that calm potential clients can prove
to be beneficial. The largest cost however is that of effort. Simply
addressing this cost by offering easy straightforward approaches to
booking a guide.
Ultimately, pricing is much different in a guide service than a
university-based program. The marketing challenges faced by each is
drastically different., largely, the ways in which a marketer can reach their
population, and what costs are appropriate.
36
37
Samples
Management.
Funding Search.
For the funding search, I selected the Outward Bound Denver Center. The center serves the
community through a number of functions ranging from day long experiences to backcountry
trips out for a week or more. Since creating the document for the assignment, I have gained a
new level of understanding about the various centers, wilderness base camps, professional,
and adjudicated youth programs Outward Bound USA delivers. The assignment required
searching for applicable grants and donations that matched the selected organization.
38
Funding Search
Bryan Hendrick
PRT-5395
Karen Paisley
October 27, 2009
Funding Search
For the funding search, I have selected Outward Bound, Denver. The
school serves the community through a number of functions ranging from day
long experiences to backcountry trips out for a week or more. The mission of
Outward Bound, and centers such as Outward Bound Denver, is a central theme
of using challenge and adventure to develop a person's character and
promote self-discovery. While the centers may not use the wilderness to the
extent of other programs, creative use of the urban landscape, and historical
venues brings about new learning and aids in the achievement of the intended
outcomes. The outcomes of any Outward Bound are relative to the environment
in which they take place, however, the underlying results of instilling values, and
development of an individual's character are the same across all venues.
Specifically, within Outward Bound Denver, students from the surrounding
community can participate in a peer leadership urban expedition. The program
reaches out to middle and high school students. It engages the individuals,
along with personal relationships with peers, in challenging environments.
Through a five day experience, students face challenges that develop
leadership and personal skills that transfer into life at home and school. The
experience of each student has similarities to wilderness based programs of
Outward Bound. Students participate in service projects and stay over night in
unique locations such as museums, along with solo time spent reflecting on the
experiences at hand.
The mission of the program is to develop the character of students
through challenge and adventure. Students are identified through faculty of
participating schools, and invited to attend the five day experience.
Additionally, students are accompanied by faculty members from their school.
The program takes place throughout the school year, and in the summer offers
wilderness based components. The outcomes are achieved through a series of
39
Funding Search
service projects, overnight stays at different locations, and solo time. The
outcomes range from development of leadership skills, to self discovery, and
transferable skills into everyday life.
There are several funding opportunities available for the program, the first
of which comes from the Corporation for National and Community service,
through their Learn and Serve America grant. The corporation seeks to improve
the participants' lives, and strengthen communities, through service learning. The
second source of possible funding is Youth Service America. The organization
serves to promote engagement of youth in issues prevalent in today society.
40
Funding Search
Funding
Source
#1
Date:
November,
1st,
2009 Funder:
Corpora9on
for
Na9onal
Outward
Bound
Denver
Community
Service
1. Name
Address,
ScoS
Richardson
Contact
Person email:
lsacschool@cns.gov
1. Financial
Data:
1. People
(Officers,
Trustees,
Staff)
Applica9on
Informa9on
3) What are the deadlines? No current deadline or next cycle, TBD.
41
Funding Search
Funding
Source
#2
Date:
November
1st,
2009 Funder:
Youth
Service
America Outward
Bound
Denver
1. Name
Address,
Youth
Service
America
Contact
Person 1101
15th
Street,
Suite
200
WA
DC
1. Financial
Data:
Total Assets Na
1. People
(Officers,
Na Na
Trustees,
Staff)
Applica9on
Informa9on
42
Funding Search
Attn: Scott Richardson
Corporation for National Community Service
Best Regards,
--
Bryan Hendrick
43
Samples
Evaluation in Parks, Recreation, and Tourism.
University of Utah Climbing Programs, Rock One Evaluation Plan.
This evaluation follows a goal-attainment model, evaluating goals and direct and measurable
objectives agency-wide along with those specific to the rock one program. In addition, this
evaluation gave specific attention to: instructors and their teaching methods, effectiveness of
varying locations, participants competencies in relation to the fundamentals taught in the
program, and, contributors and detractors for each students ability to learn. Each is directly
related to the goals and objectives specific to the rock one program and Climbing Program
in general. Additionally, the evaluation did measure the attainment of the goals through
quantitative methods.
44
Evaluation Plan
Bryan Hendrick
PRT-3780
45
Evaluation Plan
Introduction
Mission Statement
The University of Utah Climbing Programs mentor students through the entire
spectrum of climbing, from student to instructor. The program allows the students
and instructors/coordinators to learn from each other through teaching and learning
experiences. This process allows for maximum reward for the students and
instructors/coordinators.
Vision Statement
The University of Utah Climbing Programs strives to make itself sustainable. The
program will expand into the ski and alpine disciplines. During this process the
University of Utah Climbing Programs will continue to value its educational roots,
while drawing from American Mountain Guide Association accredited programs.
! The University of Utah Climbing Program facilitates programs associated with the
university. These programs range from rock climbing courses in the Parks, Recreation,
and Tourism department to mountaineering at destinations such as Mount Rainier
through the Outdoor Recreation Program. The Climbing Program started in the Fall
semester of 2007, seeing a steady growth in students over the past two years. The
unique relationship between the Parks, Recreation, and Tourism department and the
Outdoor Recreation Program has allowed the program to offer a unique and rewarding
experience for every level of students.
! In recent months the Climbing Program has been awarded accreditation from the
American Mountain Guides Association, making the Climbing Program the only
university program to hold such an accreditation. The accreditation serves to provide a
standard to which the program is held to. Several areas in which the accreditation
focuses on include permits, staff, staff training, and operational guidelines. Additionally,
the accreditation informs students along with the general public that the program
adheres to industry standards, and all instructors operate in terrain they have received
formal training to instruct in.
! Another unique aspect of the Climbing Program, is the relationship it shares
between the Parks, Recreation, and Tourism department and the Outdoor Recreation
Program. The relationship has allowed for a unified effort in providing technical climbing
programs at the University of Utah. The unification allowed for the success of the
Climbing Program and its ability to operate beyond the minimum standards set forth by
the international guiding community.
! There are a number of programs offered through the Climbing Program, a large
number are academic course through the Parks, Recreation, and Tourism department.
However, the Climbing Program does offers a number of programs through the Outdoor
Recreation Program not for credit, ranging in length from one day to week long trips. In
the past trips created the opportunity for students to climb a number of Cascade Peaks
in the Pacific North-West, and weekend ice-climbing trips to Ouray Ice Park in Colorado.
Academic courses currently take place in one of several locations; Wasatch Front, St.
George, Moab, and Ourary Ice Park. Course locations are dependent on the time of
46
Evaluation Plan
year and goals and objectives to the specific course.
! The population served by the Climbing Program presents a unique set of
challenges. Each program that takes place through out the year has a surprising
amount of diversity. Initially courses were dominated by white males, in recent
semesters there has been an uptake in white females and several other demographics.
Additionally, the students on each program have a variety of experience levels
regardless of the program offered. The challenge presented is creating a unique and
beneficial learning environment for all students.
! Instructors in the Climbing Program follow the norm within many outdoor
adventure based programs, white female and male instructors. While there is a lack of
diversity within the instructors, there is a large range in experience when exploring
backgrounds within technical climbing and teaching. The majority of instructors a have
experience solely in rock terrain, and come to the program with little experience
teaching. However, the Climbing Program has an excellent mentorship program in
which instructors have the ability to develop.
! Overall, the Climbing Program creates unique and rewarding experience through
its programs offered in the Parks, Recreation, and Tourism department, along with the
Outdoor Recreation Program. The Climbing Program continues to experience growth in
the programs offered. This evaluation explores the entry level rock course offered within
the Parks, Recreation, and Tourism department. The course aims to teach students the
basics of top rope climbing in a single pitch environment.
! In the entry level rock course, listed as "PRTL 1235: Rock 1 Seminar" in the
University of Utah catalogue, students learn the basic movements of climbing, belaying,
rappelling, and how to construct a simple two-point self-equalizing anchor. Rock one in
the past has taken place in one of two locations, the Wasatch front or Moab.
47
Evaluation Plan
Goals and Objectives
! The Climbing Program has a number of goals and objectives that are specific to
each program, and several that are agency-wide. The current set of goals and
objectives are relatively recent, developed towards the end of Summer 2009. While
there is a need for further refinement and development, the current set of goals and
objective adequately serve the current need.
! Agency-wide, two goals are set forth. The first goal is to provide students with a
basic understanding and develop a respect for the environment which surrounds the
student. This outlines the Climbing Programs goal of promoting learning and
understanding of the areas wherein climbers actively engage in the activity, in addition
to the impact each climber can have on the environment they travel in. The Second goal
is to develop and cultivate an educational environment for the student. Rather simple
and very broad, the goal is to ensure students have the opportunity to learn.
! In addition to the agency-wide goals, there are a number of objectives. The first
objective aims for Instructors to demonstrate an understanding and respect for the
environment through modeling and instructional techniques used throughout all
courses. The objective states the need for competent instructors in the practice of
Leave No Trace and the ability to teach students through various methods. The second
objective states that instructors will coach students via one-on-one and group sessions
in specific leadership skills during the course progression. While somewhat nebulous,
the objective outlines the programʼs goal of developing personal leadership skills
applicable to climbing in technical terrain. One such leadership skill is an understanding
of oneʼs own sphere of acceptable risk versus the sphere of other climbing partners.
! The final objectives deal directly with student actions and attitudes, in addition to
those of instructors. Students will demonstrate a basic respect for the environment and
individuals through their own actions and attitude. While self explanatory, the objective
aims to further create a community of climbers who value and respect one another
along with the environment. In regards to instructors, they will model leadership skills
relevant to the University of Utah Climbing Program throughout the duration of each
field day. These include: communication, competence, self-awareness, judgment and
decision making.
! Specific to the rock one program there are two goals. The first goal is to
introduce the fundamentals of top rope climbing. The broad aim of the goal is to educate
students in the basic functions needed to climb in a top rope, single pitch environment.
The second goal is development of basic climbing movements. This goal addresses the
need for each student to develop a basic ability to move on low fifth class terrain.
! Along with the specific rock one goals, there are a number of objectives which
address direct and measurable learning outcomes. The first objectives is that students
will demonstrate an ability to tie in with a figure eight consistently by the end of the
course. Essentially, students will be able to tie themselves in with a figure eight, not
needing to pause or question. The second objective: students will demonstrate an ability
to belay using the B.U.S. (brake, under, slide) system by the end of the course. The aim
of this objective is to ensure that each student understands the advantages and proper
use of the industry standard of belaying with a device such as a Black Diamond ATC.
48
Evaluation Plan
The third objective is that students will use the standard communication progression
every climb throughout the entire course. There is a strong element of risk management
present in this objective, however, it teaches students the need for clear and effective
communication throughout a climb as an essential skill in climbing any setting. The
fourth objectives states, students will demonstrate an ability and understanding of how
to build two-point self equalized anchors on fixed protection by the end of the course.
Within the fourth objective, there is question as to the validity of a student needing to
know how to build a two point anchor. However, students within the rock one program
need to understand what a proper anchor should consist of, allowing them to better
manage their own risk while climbing with others after the program. The fifth objective is
directly related to the second goal: students will demonstrate an understanding of basic
climbing movements on easy fifth class climbs by the end of the courses. In relation to
the second goal, this addresses the need for students to develop a base to build future-
advanced climbing movements off of. Finally, in the sixth objective, students will
demonstrate a basic ability to coil climbing ropes using the butterfly method by the end
of the course. Quite simply students need the ability to properly store and coil a rope.
! The program specific and agency-wide goals serve to paint a picture of what the
outputs and intended outcomes are of a given rock one course. Respectively, the
objectives further detail specific learning outcomes. While there is a need for further
refinement, the current goals and objectives adequately serve the current needs of the
University of Utah Climbing Program.
49
Evaluation Plan
The Evaluation
! Before the Fall semester of 2009, a progression was used wherein the
information covered was beyond the ability for students to adequately learn and become
competent. Over the course of the summer semester of 2009, a new progression was
developed. The new progression allows to students to become competent in skills
needed at a particular level. For instance in the previous progression, students learned
sport and tradition lead climbing in one weekend course. Today, the progression breaks
the skill sets of sport leading and traditional leading into two separate weekend courses.
This evaluation aims to examine the effectiveness of the recently implemented
progression. Evaluating the rock one program will establish a baseline, and allow an
assessment in attainment of goals and objectives.
! This evaluation follows a goal-attainment model, evaluating goals and direct and
measurable objectives agency-wide along with those specific to the rock one program.
In addition, the evaluation will give specific attention to: instructors and their teaching
methods, effectiveness of varying locations, participantʼs competencies in relation to the
fundamentals taught in the program, and, contributors and detractors for each students
ability to learn. Each is directly related to the goals and objectives specific to the rock
one program and Climbing Program in general. Additionally, the evaluation will measure
the attainment of the goals through quantitative methods.
! The information collected through this evaluation is of importance to the Climbing
Program administrative staff, as well specific members of the instructional staff. The
individuals with interest are key in future growth and sustainability of the Climbing
Program. To collect the data the instruction staff closest to the age and demographic of
students will be used. The current instructor pool for the Climbing Program provides
easy access to individuals with similarities to the student population. In addition to the
instructors collecting the data, students from rock one courses will be asked to
participate in the evaluation, providing the data need.
! To adequately measure the attainment of the goals and objectives the evaluation
be summative, taking place at the end of each rock one program. Specifically, the
evaluation will take place after all activities have concluded and students have been
debrief. However, students will be asked to participate in the evaluation before any
formal dismissal. In addition to allowing the collection of data centered on the attainment
of goals and objectives, the summative evaluation will allow the instructional staff of
each program to gain insight to whether or not teaching strategies were successful.
! For a successful evaluation, the sample size and composition of those
participating is critical. All students at the end of each rock one course will be asked to
participate in the evaluation. The composition of the sample is a direct result of the
population of currently served by the Climbing Program. The size of the sample will be
effected by enrollment of each course, however, a single semester of rock one courses
will provide an adequate sample size that ensures reliability and validity.
! Finally, the evaluation will use a questionnaire method. A questionnaire ensures
each student is receiving the same questions, over the course of several courses in a
semester. There will be a monetary need, due to photocopies and pens for students. All
other resources need are time based, instructors will need to facilitate the questionnaire
50
Evaluation Plan
on the final day. Additionally, time will be needed to summarize the final report. Several
considerations will need to be taken into account, instructors will need to ensure
students have a quite, spacious environment in which they complete the questionnaire.
51
Evaluation Plan
Rock One Program Pictorial Logic Model
52
Evaluation Plan
Rock One Program Logic Model
! For the rock one program, there are a number intricate elements. Each element
plays a role in the ultimate attainment of the goals and objectives. For instance without
the correct permit, the course would not take place, the result would be no climbing. It is
then apparent that the attainment of the goals and objectives would cease. It is vitally
important at all levels within the Climbing Program to then understand the relationship
between all elements of the logic model, and the individual role each plays in ultimately
attaining the goals and objectives.
! Within the resources and inputs there are the several key elements. These
specific elements are the base for which all takes place, and continues to move forward
from. The first resource is reliable, well maintained equipment. The need for the
climbing program to maintain equipment is critical to managing the risks of each
program that runs. Additionally, in order to maintain the accreditation from the American
Mountain Guide Association, the Climbing Program must maintain equipment used.
! The second resource or in this instance, input, are competent and
knowledgeable instructors. Each instructor plays a vital role in the success of each
program that runs. Their ability to teach in a variety of settings, assess a variety of ability
levels and learning styles and adequately facilitate is a critical input into the program. In
addition to the instructors, there is another input on the part of each student that must
be recognized by each instructor, students goals. Simply, student goals, are what each
student wishes to learn within the context of a given course. The students goals, not
only internally motivate each student, the provide an opportunity for each instructor to
individually coach a student to achieve the maximum learning potential in a course.
! The final resources are two interrelated elements, Permits and climbing sites.
First, permits allow the Climbing Program to operate in an area. Without a permit, both
instructors and students can be held to federal charges. The critical need for a permit
allow the climbing program to access areas, and run a program. Additionally, the
appropriate climbing sites must be used for a given program. In regards to a rock one
course, a number easy fifth class climbs in the same area are needed. In addition to the
availability of easy fifth class climbs, the site also needs to have a ground area suitable
for a large group, and a variety of other factors met. Each of the resources and inputs
play a vital role in the success of the rock one program. Each element has a role in
allowing each rock one course to take place.
! These resources and inputs feed into the next step in the rock one program logic
model, Activities. The activities which take place are the things which the rock one
program must do in order to achieve the intended Outputs, Outcomes, and Impacts.
The resource of competent and knowledgeable instructors, feeds into the activity of
instructor training. The Climbing Programs mentor ship program and each semester
instructor training courses, ensure each instructor has the adequate ability to teach and
perform the vital functions necessary to teach in the single pitch terrain of a rock one
course. In turn, the same input that affects instructor training also plays a role in the
actual instruction of a rock one course.
! In addition to competent and knowledgeable instructors, participants goals also
53
Evaluation Plan
feed into the instruction of a rock one course. The activity of instructing is a primary
function to archiving the intended goals and outcomes. Instructing require competency,
in understanding the effects the environment, individual learning styles and previous
experience have on the course. In addition, the instructor while teaching needs to
recognize differing learning styles and appropriately adapt to meet the needs of each.
! Next, the students primary activity of climbing, is directly related to the resource
of climbing sites. Without the proper selection of climbing sites students may not obtain
the intended learning outcomes, creating a less the educational environment.
! The final activity is that of logging equipment use. The activity of logging
equipment use, is fed by the the resource of reliable, well maintained equipment. As
equipment is used, it must be tracked and noted for any discrepancies. Not only does
this activity keep the Climbing Program operating in accordance of the accreditation of
the American Mountain Guide Association, it is another critical element in assuring the
management of risk.
! The rock one program has three outputs, each shares a number of activities,
which in turn feed into several outcomes. The first Output is knowledge of the
surrounding environment is shared. This output is fed by the activities of instructor
training and instruction. Each instructor needs to understand and have the ability to
teach on subjects such as; differing rock types, wildlife, and our impact as climbers on
the environment. This output is directly related to the agency-wide goals.
! The next Output is students climb. While very similar to the activity of climbing, it
is additionally fed by the activity of instructor training. For students to climb there is a
need for instructors to have the ability to setup top rope climbs, and coach students on
various movements. This output is a direct result of students putting theory into practice.
! The final output is that of instructors managing risk. Managing risk, ranges from
the equipment to students individual boundaries. In either case, and every where in
between, the activity of logging equipment use and instructor training is critical to the
output of managing risks.
! Similar to the outputs, are the outcomes. Each of which is an critical element in
the success of obtaining the goals and objectives. The first outcome is that of students
learning the fundamentals of climbing. These fundamentals are those stated in the
objectives of the rock one program. The main output affecting this outcome is students
climbing, and using the skills taught. Additionally, as a result of the outcomes, students
climbing and instructors managing risk, Instructors foster an educative environment.
Wherein, student learning outcomes are achieved and a multitude of needs are met.
! The final two outcomes are related; Students develop a respect for the risks
involved in climbing, and, students push their personal boundaries. Respectively, each
is fed by the outputs of; knowledge of surrounding environment is shared, and, students
climb. In each students learn about them selves while developing an understanding and
respect the risks associated with climbing. However, the outcome of students pushing
their personal boundaries, is unique in that it presents an opportunity for evaluation in
the future.
! After outcomes, the logic model describes the long-term impacts the rock one
program has. Each is of importance for the sustainability of the Climbing Program, and
a direct result of the inputs, activities, outputs, and outcomes. The first impact is, three
years after the course students continue to have an increased value for the
54
Evaluation Plan
environment. This impact has long term implications due to the personal experience
students have had in a wilderness area. Additionally, students continue to practice a
form of Leave No Trace, and support the climbing community in access to climbing
areas.
! The other impact is a bit longer in time, five years after a course, students will
continue to have an increased interest in climbing related actives. The long term
involvement of a student is vital in the sustainability of the Climbing Program.
Additionally, this impact is directly affected by the experience a student has on their rock
one course, and their ability to succeed.
! Each part of the logic model represents a critical element to the success in
obtaining the intended goals and objectives, agency-wide and those specific to the rock
one program. Each relates to one another, without the success within one element, the
next step in the logic model is rather difficult if not impossible to obtain.
55
Evaluation Plan
56
Evaluation Plan
Quantitative Methods
! Student goals
! Instructor goals
! Individual student and instructor backgrounds and attitudes
! Instructor use of teachable moments and various teaching strategies
! Competency
! Educative environment
! Understanding of risks, and risk management
! Understanding of the environment which the student is in
! The dependent variables listed are directly related to the goals and objectives of
the rock one program. All are dependent on the independent variables list earlier. For
example, a students ability to learn is the result of an educative environment. For an
educative environment to exist, instructors need to recognize a teachable moment,
various learning styles present, and even current development of the group.
! However, it is important to recognize the relationship and complexities of an
experience in an adventure based program, such as the Climbing Program. The
variables listed are specific elements that have been identified as relevant to the
evaluation. Conversely, one could argue the need to further include the additional
instrument to take into consideration other elements at play. For this evaluation, focus is
given to variables that affect the attainment of the goals and objectives through the use
of a questionnaire completed by students.
! To measure data related to outputs, outcomes and impacts, the questionnaire
uses series of likert scales, semantic differentials, and a ranking. Elements of the
57
Evaluation Plan
outputs, outcomes and impacts determined to be measured through quantitative means
are;
! Students Climb
! Instructors Manage Risks
! Students learn the fundamentals of climbing
! Students develop a respect for the risks involved in climbing
! Students push their personal boundaries
! Instructors foster an educative environment
! Five years after course students will continue to have an increased interest in
! ! climbing related activities
! Each element was then paired with other elements creating three subcategories;
competency, risk management, and a educational environment. The first series in the
questionnaire is specific to the competency subcategory. Students are asked to rate on
a likert scale from one (unable to perform skill) to five (proficient) their understanding
and ability to effectively use each skill. The items used in the series, are the five skills
outlined in the rock one program objectives. This series and the items within directly
measure the attainment of the objectives.
! The next series contains a set of semantic differentials. This series is specific to
the risk management subcategory. There are six blocks for a student to fill in, the range
is specific to each item, and students are asked to fill in the block closest to their
feelings. Five items are used, two focus on the output of instructors managing risk,
followed by three more items which focus on a students development of respect for the
risk involved in climbing.
! The final quantitative series contains a ranking. This ranking is used to asses the
subcategory of an educational environment. Students are asked to rank from one (the
greatest) to five (the lowest) the influence each item had on their ability to learn. Five
items were identified, each is related to an output or an outcome.
! To ensure an accurate assessment, the validity of the quantitative items is of high
importance. The validity of each item is based on content. Each item relates the the
rock one course, and a subcategory - which in turn is related to a set of outputs,
outcomes, or impacts. Additionally, the questionnaires quantitative series of items are
ensured accuracy through internal consistency in the reliability. Due to the specific goals
and objectives along with each output, outcome, and impact, a trend towards attainment
should be present.
58
Evaluation Plan
Qualitative Methods
!
! These elements of the outputs and impacts are addressed through one question,
related to then environment and directed at future involvement.
! Looking back on your course, how do view your role as a climber in the
! ! wilderness in the coming months and years?!
59
Evaluation Plan
Bibliography
American Mountain Guide Association. (2009). Accreditation Program. Retrieved October 4, 2009, from
! http://amga.com/programs/accreditation.php
Karla A. Henderson, & M. Deborah Baileschko. (2002). Evaluating Leisure Services, making enlighten
decisions (2nd ed.). State College, PA: Venture Publishing, Inc.
University of Utah Climbing Program. (2009). About Us. Retrieved October 2, 2009, from
! http://climbing.utah.edu/aboutus.html
60
61
“Experience: the most brutal
of teachers. But you learn, my
62
god do you learn.”
C S Lewis
Senior
Internship
Internship Rationale, Goals, and Artifacts
63
Senior Internship
Rationale for Internship Placement.
The University of Utah: Parks, Recreation, and Tourism department, has provided a
number of valuable classes, which have contributed to my growth as a professional in
this field. This past summer afforded the opportunity to take a strong academic base in
experiential education (applying knowledge to real situations) and move from theory to
practice. In the summer of 2010 I stated my career with Outward Bound, and have
found the organization to be a perfect fit for my own rationale in using Experiential
Education to teach invaluable lessons. My current position within the organization is
“Assistant Instructor.” Time is spent in the field gaining experience, while being mentored
by senior staff. Unfortunately, it does not allow for much experience to be gained in the
way of the administration aspects of such an organization. However, the internship
opportunity that Outward Bound has provided allows a number of advantages in my
growth academically and professionally;
• Continued opportunity to take numerous theories and other knowledge and
create new learning and practical knowledge
• Learning in the organization and administration at the largest Outward Bound
base camp in the United States
o Gaining insight into land management
o Itinerary writing (managing a large number of separate student groups in
close proximity to one another)
o Staffing courses
o Logistical aspects (gear/vehicle management)
o Gaining further knowledge of the history of Outward Bound (including
possible opportunities to interact with the first Outward Bound staff).
• Management of students in new terrain and environment (snow and ice, winter
conditions)
• Participating in “Winter Skills Training,” December 2010.
I am excited to look beyond the next several years, and to see the potential that is
within myself. The career in front of me has this internship as critical stepping-stone. As I
pass from a student to a professional in the field of experiential education, this internship
will allow me to bridge the gap between my academic experience and practice.
64
Senior Internship
Internsip Goals.
1. Actively engage in a number of administrative activities vital to the operation of
the Outward Bound, Rocky Mountain Program.
2. Gain further experience and mentorship within the mission delivery of Outward
Bound on a variety of winter course types.
3. Round-out experience and skill set applicable to year round course work within
Outward Bound.
4. Effectively support winter courses and the LMC administrative team.
The goals listed above hold importance for myself due to a desire to see continued
professional development and growth, within Outward Bound. During my previous
summer working for “OB” in the Rocky Mountain Program, I found it difficult to gain an
understanding of the larger inner workings of the organization, an understanding that
provides insight into the reasoning behind a number of policies, courses flows, food
packing, itineraries, etc. Perhaps more importantly, I have a strong desire to work year
round within the experiential education community, hopefully at Outward Bound. This
internship allows me to not only refine my personal skill set, but also the management of
students in the unforgiving winter terrain we operate in. A positive end result would be
for myself to be viewed as a strong year round instructor for “OB” in Colorado. There are
only a few programs within the industry as a whole that offer winter course work for
instructors. This internship is effectively allowing me to gain a foot-hold in the winter
programming that takes place by Outward Bound in Colorado, an important step in
procuring year round work.
65
Senior Internship
Artifact #1 - Course Area Guides.
At Outward Bound, we operate in a number of course areas. In Colorado we have operated
in several ranges since 1962. As one can imagine, decades of valuable information has been
collected, clarified, and bolstered over time. In the mid 1990’s the format for the Course Area
Guide where changed in Colorado, by the Program Director at the time. Some information
was lost, the largest change was clumping information by a large heading such as “Peaks.” In
the last few years, this has created frustrations among field staff - the old CAGs presented
information by drainage.
I have included several pages from the Sangre De Cristo course area guide. Updating course
area guides is a central duty for one of our assistant program directors. It demonstrates my
attainment of engaging in the administrative tasks of the Rocky Mountain Program.
To reorganize the CAG, a sharp learning curve is encountered. All peaks, routes, rock climbing
sites, Tyrollean traverse, and a number of other items, must be located and attached to a
specific drainage. For this task, I grouped information by drainage, added new information
and clarified other pre-existing beta. In addition, a reference map was created, highlighting
and labeling each drainage.
66
Course Area Guides
Map of the Sangre De Cristo Basins
67
Course Area Guides
Creston Peak, 14,294’
Quad: Crestone Peak
South Ridge
From Hamilton Peak this ridge is airy and beautiful with some scrambling. The last section to the summit of
Blanca may be 4th class.
69
70
Senior Internship
Artifact #2 - Field Staff Evaluation.
To gain further experience and mentorship within the mission delivery of Outward Bound on a
variety of winter course types, I participated as both trainer and trainee on our Winter Skills
Training, and worked as an instructor on two winter courses: backcountry skiing and
snowboarding, and a Veterans course. These experiences gave the opportunity for me to
facilitate a number of activities and lessons, manage students in avalanche terrain, and work
with students in the hard, unforgiving environment of winter.
This artifact is a field staff evaluation used by Outward Bound nationally. It is from the end of
the Backcountry Skiing and Snowboarding course. All field evals are first completed by the
individual (self-evaluation), then co-instructors and course directors leave additional
feedback. A final feedback opportunity takes place to clarify anything on the evaluation or
to explain thoughts. This evaluation demonstrates the learning and opportunity afforded
towards attaining my second goal: gain further experience and mentorship within the mission
delivery of Outward Bound on a variety of winter course types.
71
Field Staff Evaluation
72
Field Staff Evaluation
73
Field Staff Evaluation
74
Field Staff Evaluation
75
76
Senior Internship
Artifact #3 - Beacon Fundamentals.
During the three courses I was a part of, I taught a Beacon Fundamentals lesson. Each time, I
was able to adapt the lesson for the specific population and learning styles, and refine form
feedback from co-instructors.
The purpose of this lesson is to teach students a basic level of terminology, in addition to
putting the beacon on and turning it on/off and between search and transmit.
77
Beacon Fundamentals
Sample Matching Card Used in
facilitating the beacon search
fundamentals lesson. The top
portion is cut off from the
“mountain horizion” like line, in
total between 9 and 12 cards must
be put back together. The card
amount can change depending
on the goals of the course, and A mode you put the
population.
beacon into, so that you
can look for a buried
beacon.
78
79
80
Senior Internship
Artifact #4 - Winter Food Menu and Packing Amounts.
My final goal during the internship was to effectively support winter courses and the LMC
administrative team, was attained through a number of logistical tasks and other assignments
from Veronica, APD of logistics. Supporting the winter program, encompasses everything from
doing post-course laundry to creating documents and resources. During the internship I
created two resources that aided in supporting courses: winter course menus and packing
amounts.
The document lays out a general menu for several course formats, along with packing
amounts based on the number of combined students and staff. To create such a document,
one has to have an understanding of amounts in relation to servings, how different
populations eat in the winter, and a good working understanding of Microsoft Excel.
81
Food and Menu
82
83
In-field menus
Ski/Ride 8 Day Break Fast Lunch Dinner
Day 4 south south sack lunch Appetizer: Bear Creek Soup Pack.
Penne, Thai sauce, Butter, Meatballs or Veggie patties,
Asian Veggies, PB.
Day 5 Granola/Oatmeal (w/ Rasins&Brown sugar) Crackers, PB/J, Salami and Cheeze sticks, Snack Appetizer: Ramen w/cream of mushroom.
bags/Fruit Bars Cheese Tortellini w/ Cheese sauce, Chicken or Tofu,
Broccoli mix & Garlic Bread, Butter.
Day 6 Bacon, Eggs, Hash brown, Shreded Cheese Hot Lunch: Split Peas Soup, Potato Pearls, Appetizer: Bear Creek Soup Pack.
Pepperoni, Shredded Chz, Gravy, Snack bags, Fruit Rice/Beans, w/ Chicken or Tofu , Peppers mix, Salsa,
bars, Cheese Sticks. Shredded cheese, Butter.
Day 7 Scrambled Eggs, Cheesy Grits, Sausage or Veggie Crackers, PB/J, and Cheese Sticks, Snack south
Sausage, Butter, Shredded cheese. bags/Fruit bars
Day 9 Granola/Oatmeal (w/ Raisons & Brown Sugar) Crackers, PB/J, Salami and Cheese Sticks, Snack south
bags/Fruit bars
84
Professional
life
Summary of internship, and becoming a professional
85
Professional life
General Internship Summary.
The internship placement was with Outward Bound USA, Rocky Mountain Program in
Leadville, Colorado, From December 2010 to Mid-March 2011. The position I held as a winter
program intern is hard to define, in many respects due to previously working as a field
instructor. Challenges aside, my role during the internship can be simply put as field work and
administrative tasks.
While in the field, I had the same responsibilities as an instructor: Facilitating activities and
lessons, students management, checkin with students pertaining to self care, inspiring self-
discovery and creating the opportunity for character development. During the backcountry
skiing and snowboarding course, I was given a number of opportunities to teach new lessons,
such as beacon fundamentals, along with experimenting with a new metaphor “the layers of
our lives,” using a watered down snow pit lesson in relation to the layers of the snowpack. In
many respects, the winter courses afforded the opportunity to gain further experience
delivering the Outward Bound mission, and instruct 18+ hour days in sub-zero temperatures,
where self-care must be a proficiency in order to take care of students.
In the office, a number of tasks were completed relating to human resources, logistics, land
management, and other miscellaneous areas. The following is a list that highlights particular
projects;
•Reorganization and bolstering of Sangre De Cristo/Marble Course Area Guides.
•Creation of ice climbing checklist
•Creation of Microsoft Access database for course staffing management
•Developing new curriculum for winter courses: beacon fundamentals, snow pit lesson
(layers of our lives), etc.
For all of these projects, I was given outlines, and allowed to create the solution within a few
boundaries. Thus, I had a high level of ownership and responsibility within each. From project
to project various elements present new challenges and the opportunity to develop creative
solutions. As a whole, I was able to present myself as a valuable asset to the administrative
team in Leadville, through independently creating solutions, finishing projects in a timely
fashion, and proving dependable throughout the 3 months.
86
Professional life
Evaluation of Internship.
This opportunity gave me a look into the reality of working in the industry, largely the transient
nature, and instability of field work. That aside administrative positions can allow an individual
to have a stable career, however, I can not see myself working solely as an administrator for
some time. This internship allowed me to put a number of theoretical ideas and other skills
learned during university into practice. The practical knowledge gained adds depth to my
abilities and understanding in delivering courses and the inner workings of administrating such
a large program.
Outward Bound offers a fantastic opportunity to interns. During our summer programs, roughly
twenty interns work over a peak season with three weeks in the field gaining experience. For
the winter, there is not a standard intern program. However, the program still offers a great
opportunity to work closely with various administrators and gain practical experience with
winter programs.
The largest problem I encountered during the internship was the “grey” area I lived in, in other
words, the way in which my role changed from situation to situation based on my past
working history as an instructor. However, this allowed for a tremendous amount of learning
about myself and the ways in which interactions and clarity of roles is helpful.
In learning about myself, there are a few key awarenesses that I have gained: in certain
situations I can discuss quite a bit about myself, missing the opportunity to develop stronger
relationships with other individuals. An academic background in this field can add a large
amount of intention to what is being facilitated, however this same knowledge can be
perceived as threatening by those without such a background - thus I find there to be a
dichotomy in the use of such knowledge and when to share it.
The internship has given a great deal more of practical experience to draw upon. This career
path has me excited to be a part of creating powerful learning experiences for students,
through the mountains. I see myself working in this field for years to come, oddly enough
working with students in the field is a relaxing activity for me, which adds to the sense of
sustainability. I view the largest challenge to be developing a network and reputation within
the field so that I may easily find work year round, and being flexible in working with various
populations, course types, and course areas.
87
“Risk, there is no real living without it. Die we
all must, but try to knock all risk out of our
lives and we lock ourselves tighter and tighter
into a safe, comfortable, deadly box, and we
die too, without ever having lived.”
Willi Onsoeld
88