Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
The most common form of wireless power transmission is carried out using direct
induction followed by resonant magnetic induction. Other methods under consideration
include electromagnetic radiation in the form of microwaves or lasers.[2]
Contents
[hide]
• 6 External links
In a direct current circuit, if the current is continuous, the fields are constant; there is a
condition of stress in the space surrounding the conductor, which represents stored
electric and magnetic energy, just as a compressed spring or a moving mass represents
stored energy. In an alternating current circuit, the fields also alternate; that is, with every
half wave of current and of voltage, the magnetic and the electric field start at the
conductor and run outwards into space with the velocity of light.[4] Where these
alternating fields impinge on another conductor a voltage and a current are induced.[3]
Any change in the electrical conditions of the circuit, whether internal[5] or external[6]
involves a readjustment of the stored magnetic and electric field energy of the circuit, that
is, a so-called transient. A transient is of the general character of a condenser discharge
through an inductive circuit. The phenomenon of the condenser discharge through an
inductive circuit therefore is of the greatest importance to the engineer, as the foremost
cause of high-voltage and high-frequency troubles in electric circuits.[7]
Electromagnetic induction is proportional to the intensity of the current and voltage in the
conductor which produces the fields and to the frequency. The higher the frequency the
more intense the induction effect. Energy is transferred from a conductor that produces
the fields (the primary) to any conductor on which the fields impinge (the secondary).
Part of the energy of the primary conductor passes inductively across space into
secondary conductor and the energy decreases rapidly along the primary conductor. A
high frequency current does not pass for long distances along a conductor but rapidly
transfers its energy by induction to adjacent conductors. Higher induction resulting from
the higher frequency is the explanation of the apparent difference in the propagation of
high frequency disturbances from the propagation of the low frequency power of
alternating current systems. The higher the frequency the more preponderant become the
inductive effects that transfer energy from circuit to circuit across space. The more
rapidly the energy decreases and the current dies out along the circuit, the more local is
the phenomenon.[3]
The flow of electric energy thus comprises phenomena inside of the conductor[8] and
phenomena in the space outside of the conductor—the electric field—which, in a
continuous current circuit, is a condition of steady magnetic and dielectric stress, and in
an alternating current circuit is alternating, that is, an electric wave launched by the
conductor[3] to become far-field electromagnetic radiation traveling through space with
the velocity of light.
In electric power transmission and distribution, the phenomena inside of the conductor
are of main importance, and the electric field of the conductor is usually observed only
incidentally.[9] Inversely, in the use of electric power for radio telecommunications it is
only the electric and magnetic fields outside of the conductor, that is electromagnetic
radiation, which is of importance in transmitting the message. The phenomenon in the
conductor, the current in the launching structure, is not used.[3]
The electric charge displacement in the conductor produces a magnetic field and resultant
lines of electric force. The magnetic field is a maximum in the direction concentric, or
approximately so, to the conductor. That is, a ferromagnetic body[10] tends to set itself in a
direction at right angles to the conductor. The electric field has a maximum in a direction
radial, or approximately so, to the conductor. The electric field component tends in a
direction radial to the conductor and dielectric bodies may be attracted or repelled
radially to the conductor.[11]
The electric field of a circuit over which energy flows has three main axes at right angles
with each other:
Where the electric circuit consists of several conductors, the electric fields of the
conductors superimpose upon each other, and the resultant magnetic field lines and lines
of electric force are not concentric and radial respectively, except approximately in the
immediate neighborhood of the conductor. Between parallel conductors they are
conjugate of circles. Neither the power consumption in the conductor, nor the magnetic
field, nor the electric field, are proportional to the flow of energy through the circuit.
However, the product of the intensity of the magnetic field and the intensity of the
electric field is proportional to the flow of energy or the power, and the power is
therefore resolved into a product of the two components i and e, which are chosen
proportional respectively to the intensity of the magnetic field and of the electric field.
The component called the current is defined as that factor of the electric power which is
proportional to the magnetic field, and the other component, called the voltage, is defined
as that factor of the electric power which is proportional to the electric field.[11]
In radio telecommunications the electric field of the transmit antenna propagates through
space as a radio wave and impinges upon the receive antenna where it is observed by its
magnetic and electric effect.[11] Radio waves, microwaves, infrared radiation, visible light,
ultraviolet radiation, X rays and gamma rays are shown to be the same electromagnetic
radiation phenomenon, differing one from the other only in frequency of vibration.[3][12]
The electrodynamic induction wireless transmission technique is near field over distances
up to about one-sixth of the wavelength used. Near field energy itself is non-radiative but
some radiative losses do occur. In addition there are usually resistive losses. With
electrodynamic induction, electric current flowing through a primary coil creates a
magnetic field that acts on a secondary coil producing a current within it. Coupling must
be tight in order to achieve high efficiency. As the distance from the primary is increased,
more and more of the magnetic field misses the secondary. Even over a relatively short
range the inductive coupling is grossly inefficient, wasting much of the transmitted
energy.[13]
The application of resonance improves the situation somewhat. When resonant coupling
is used the transmitter and receiver inductors are tuned to a mutual frequency and the
drive current is modified from a sinusoidal to a nonsinusoidal transient waveform.[14]
Pulse power transfer occurs over multiple cycles. In this way significant power may be
transmitted over a distance of up to a few times the size of the primary coil. Transmitting
and receiving coils are usually single layer solenoids or flat spirals with series capacitors,
which, in combination, allow the receiving element to be tuned to the transmitter
frequency.
It is also used for powering devices having no batteries, such as RFID patches and
contactless smartcards, and to couple electrical energy from the primary inductor to the
helical resonator of Tesla coil wireless power transmitters.
The electric energy transmitted through the atmosphere can be utilized by receiving
devices.[23][24][25][26] Tesla demonstrated the illumination of wireless lamps by energy that
was coupled to them through an alternating electric field.[27][28][20]
Far field methods achieve longer ranges, often multiple kilometer ranges, where the
distance is much greater than the diameter of the device(s). The main reason for longer
ranges with radio wave and optical devices is the fact that electromagnetic radiation in
the far-field can be made to match the shape of the receiving area (using high directivity
antennas or well-collimated Laser Beam) thereby delivering almost all emitted power at
long ranges. The maximum directivity for antennas is physically limited by diffraction.
The size of the components may be dictated by the distance from transmitter to receiver,
the wavelength and the Rayleigh criterion or diffraction limit, used in standard radio
frequency antenna design, which also applies to lasers. In addition to the Rayleigh
criterion Airy's diffraction limit is also frequently used to determine an approximate spot
size at an arbitrary distance from the aperture.
The Rayleigh criterion dictates that any radio wave, microwave or laser beam will spread
and become weaker and diffuse over distance; the larger the transmitter antenna or laser
aperture compared to the wavelength of radiation, the tighter the beam and the less it will
spread as a function of distance (and vice versa). Smaller antennae also suffer from
excessive losses due to side lobes. However, the concept of laser aperture considerably
differs from an antenna. Typically, a laser aperture much larger than the wavelength
induces multi-moded radiation and mostly collimators are used before emitted radiation
couples into a fiber or into space.
Then the power levels are calculated by combining the above parameters together, and
adding in the gains and losses due to the antenna characteristics and the transparency and
dispersion of the medium through which the radiation passes. That process is known as
calculating a link budget.
An artist's depiction of a solar satellite that could send electric energy by microwaves to a
space vessel or planetary surface.
Power transmission via radio waves can be made more directional, allowing longer
distance power beaming, with shorter wavelengths of electromagnetic radiation, typically
in the microwave range. A rectenna may be used to convert the microwave energy back
into electricity. Rectenna conversion efficiencies exceeding 95% have been realized.
Power beaming using microwaves has been proposed for the transmission of energy from
orbiting solar power satellites to Earth and the beaming of power to spacecraft leaving
orbit has been considered.[2][31]
Power beaming by microwaves has the difficulty that for most space applications the
required aperture sizes are very large due to diffraction limiting antenna directionality.
For example, the 1978 NASA Study of solar power satellites required a 1-km diameter
transmitting antenna, and a 10 km diameter receiving rectenna, for a microwave beam at
2.45 GHz[citation needed]. These sizes can be somewhat decreased by using shorter
wavelengths, although short wavelengths may have difficulties with atmospheric
absorption and beam blockage by rain or water droplets. Because of the "thinned array
curse," it is not possible to make a narrower beam by combining the beams of several
smaller satellites.
For earthbound applications a large area 10 km diameter receiving array allows large
total power levels to be used while operating at the low power density suggested for
human electromagnetic exposure safety. A human safe power density of 1 mW/cm2
distributed across a 10 km diameter area corresponds to 750 megawatts total power level.
This is the power level found in many modern electric power plants.
Following World War II, which saw the development of high-power microwave emitters
known as cavity magnetrons, the idea of using microwaves to transmit power was
researched. By 1964 a miniature helicopter propelled by microwave power had been
demonstrated.[32]
Japanese researcher Hidetsugu Yagi also investigated wireless energy transmission using
a directional array antenna that he designed. In February 1926, Yagi and Uda published
their first paper on the tuned high-gain directional array now known as the Yagi antenna.
While it did not prove to be particularly useful for power transmission, this beam antenna
has been widely adopted throughout the broadcasting and wireless telecommunications
industries due to its excellent performance characteristics.[33]
Wireless high power transmission using microwaves is well proven. Experiments in the
tens of kilowatts have been performed at Goldstone in California in 1975[34][35][36] and
more recently (1997) at Grand Bassin on Reunion Island.[37] These methods achieve
distances on the order of a kilometer.
Advantages of laser based energy transfer compared with other wireless methods are:[38]
The laser "powerbeaming" technology has been mostly explored in military weapons[40][41]
[42]
and aerospace [43][44] applications and is now being developed for commercial and
consumer electronics Low-Power applications. Wireless energy transfer system using
laser for consumer space has to satisfy Laser safety requirements standardized under IEC
60825.
To develop an understanding of the trade-offs of Laser ("a special type of light wave"-
based system):[45][46][47][48]
1. Propagation of a laser beam [49][50][51] (on how Laser beam propagation is much less
affected by diffraction limits)
2. Coherence and the range limitation problem (on how spatial and spectral
coherence characteristics of Lasers allows better distance-to-power capabilities
[52]
)
3. Airy disk (on how wavelength fundamentally dictates the size of a disk with
distance)
4. Applications of laser diodes (on how the laser sources are utilized in various
industries and their sizes are reducing for better integration)
Geoffrey Landis [53][54][55] is one of the pioneers of solar power satellite [56] and laser-based
transfer of energy especially for space and lunar missions. The continuously increasing
demand for safe and frequent space missions has resulted in serious thoughts on a
futuristic space elevator[57] [58] that would be powered by lasers. NASA's space elevator
would need wireless power to be beamed to it for it to climb a tether.[59]
Means for long conductors of electricity forming part of an electric circuit and
electrically connecting said ionized beam to an electric circuit. Hettinger 1917 -(U.S.
Patent 1,309,031)
Single wire with Earth return electrical power transmission systems rely on current
flowing through the earth plus a single wire insulated from the earth to complete the
circuit. In emergencies high-voltage direct current power transmission systems can also
operate in the 'single wire with earth return' mode. Elimination of the raised insulated
wire, and transmission of high-potential, high-frequency alternating current through the
earth with an atmospheric return circuit has been investigated as a method of wireless
electrical power transmission. Transmission of electrical energy through the earth alone,
eliminating the second conductor is also being investigated.
Low frequency alternating current can be transmitted through the inhomogeneous earth
with low loss because the net resistance between earth antipodes is considerably less than
1 ohm.[63] The electrical displacement takes place predominantly by electrical conduction
through the oceans, and metallic ore bodies and similar subsurface structures. The
electrical displacement is also by means of electrostatic induction through the more
dielectric regions such as quartz deposits and other non-conducting minerals.[64][65]
Alternating current can be transmitted through atmospheric strata having a barometric
pressure of less than 135 millimeters of mercury.[66] Current flows by means of
electrostatic induction through the lower atmosphere up to about two or three miles above
the plants[67] (this is the middle part in a three-space model) and the flow of ions, that is to
say, electrical conduction through the ionized region above three miles. Intense vertical
beams of ultraviolet light may be used to ionize the atmospheric gasses directly above the
two elevated terminals resulting in the formation of plasma high-voltage electrical
transmission lines leading up to the conducting atmospheric strata. The end result is a
flow electrical current between the two elevated terminals by a path up to and through the
troposphere and back down to the other facility.[68] Electrical conduction through
atmospheric strata is made possible by the creation of capacitively coupled discharge
plasma through the process of atmospheric ionization.[69][70][71][72]
Tesla discovered that electrical energy can be transmitted through the earth and the
atmosphere. In the course of his research he successfully lit lamps at moderate distances
and was able to detect the transmitted energy at much greater distances. The
Wardenclyffe Tower project was a commercial venture for trans-Atlantic wireless
telephony and proof-of-concept demonstrations of global wireless power transmission.
The facility was not completed because of insufficient funding.[73]
Earth is a naturally conducting body and forms one conductor of the system. A second
path is established through the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere starting at an
elevation of approximately 4.5 miles (7.2 km).[74]
A global system for "the transmission of electrical energy without wires" called the
World Wireless System, dependent upon the high electrical conductivity of plasma and
the high electrical conductivity of the earth, was proposed as early as 1904.[75][76]
The same transmitter used for the atmospheric conduction method is used for the
terrestrial single-conductor earth resonance method.[77][78]
Observations have been made that may be inconsistent with a basic tenet of physics
related to the scalar derivatives of the electromagnetic potentials [84][85][86][87][88][89][90] that
are presently considered to be nonphysical.[91]
[edit] Timeline of wireless power
• 1820: André-Marie Ampère develops Ampere’s law showing that electric current
produces a magnetic field.
• 1831: Michael Faraday develops Faraday’s law of induction describing the
electromagnetic force induced in a conductor by a time-varying magnetic flux.
• 1836: Nicholas Callan invents the electrical transformer.
• 1864: James Clerk Maxwell synthesizes the previous observations, experiments
and equations of electricity, magnetism and optics into a consistent theory and
mathematically models the behavior of electromagnetic radiation.
• 1888: Heinrich Rudolf Hertz confirms the existence of electromagnetic radiation.
Hertz’s "apparatus for generating electromagnetic waves" was a VHF or UHF
"radio wave" spark gap transmitter.
• 1891: Tesla improves Hertz-wave wireless transmitter RF power supply or exciter
in his patent No. 454,622, "System of Electric Lighting."
• 1893: Tesla demonstrates the wireless illumination of phosphorescent lamps of
his design at the World's Columbian Exposition in Chicago.[92]
• 1893: Tesla publicly demonstrates wireless power before a meeting of the
National Electric Light Association in St. Louis.[26][93][94]
• 1894: Tesla lights incandescent lamps wirelessly at the 35 South Fifth Avenue
laboratory in New York City by means of "electro-dynamic induction" or
resonant inductive coupling.[95][96][97]
• 1894: Hutin & LeBlanc, espouse long held view that inductive energy transfer
should be possible, they received U.S. Patent # 527,857 describing a system for
power transmission at 3 kHz.[98]
• 1894: Jagdish Chandra Bose ignites gunpowder and rings a bell at a distance
using electromagnetic waves, showing that communications signals can be sent
without using wires.[99][100]
• 1896: Tesla demonstrates wireless transmission over a distance of about
48 kilometres (30 mi).[101]
• 1897: Tesla files his first patent application dealing specifically with wireless
transmission.
• 1899: Tesla continues his wireless power transmission research in Colorado
Springs and writes, "the inferiority of the induction method would appear
immense as compared with the disturbed charge of ground and air method."[102]
• 1902: Nikola Tesla vs. Reginald Fessenden - U.S. Patent Interference No. 21,701,
System of Signaling (wireless); wireless power transmission, time and frequency
domain spread spectrum telecommunications, electronic logic gates in general.[103]
• 1904: At the St. Louis World's Fair, a prize is offered for a successful attempt to
drive a 0.1 horsepower (75 W) airship motor by energy transmitted through space
at a distance of at least 100 feet (30 m).[104]
• 1916: Tesla states, "In my [disturbed charge of ground and air] system, you
should free yourself of the idea that there is [electromagnetic] radiation, that
energy is radiated. It is not radiated; it is conserved."[105]
• 1917: Tesla's Wardenclyffe tower is demolished. . . .
• 1926: Shintaro Uda and Hidetsugu Yagi publish their first paper on Uda's "tuned
high-gain directional array"[33] better known as the Yagi antenna.
• Beam-powered propulsion
• Beam Power Challenge — one of the NASA Centennial Challenges
• Distributed generation
• Electricity distribution
• Electric power transmission
• Transmission medium
• Microwave power transmission
• Friis transmission equation
• Thinned array curse
• Resonant energy transfer
• Differential capacitance
• Wardenclyffe Tower
• Electromagnetic compatibility
Patents
• U.S. Patent 4,955,562, Microwave powered aircraft, John E. Martin, et al. (1990).
• U.S. Patent 3,933,323, Solid state solar to microwave energy converter system
and apparatus, Kenneth W. Dudley, et al. (1976).
• U.S. Patent 3,535,543, Microwave power receiving antenna, Carroll C. Dailey
(1970).
• U.S. Patent 685,958, Method of Utilizing Radiant Energy, Nikola Tesla (1901).
• U.S. Patent 685,957, Apparatus for the Utilization of Radiant Energy, Nikola
Tesla (1901).
• U.S. Patent 649,621, Apparatus for Transmission of Electrical Energy, Nikola
Tesla (1900).
[edit] References
1. ^ A radio transmitter can produce waves having a power of several
kilowatts or even megawatts but this energy scatters in all directions. Only a small
fraction, less than a millionth part, of the transmitted energy is received. However,
this is sufficient to yield the intelligence.
2. ^ a b G. A. Landis, "Applications for Space Power by Laser Transmission,"
SPIE Optics, Electro-optics & Laser Conference, Los Angeles CA, January 24–
28, 1994; Laser Power Beaming, SPIE Proceedings Vol. 2121, 252-255.
3. ^ a b c d e f General Electric review, Volume 15 By General Electric.
"Velocity of Propagation of Electric Field", Charles Proteus Steinmetz
4. ^ 188,000 miles per second
5. ^ Such as an internal change of load, starting and switching operations,
and short circuits.
6. ^ Such as the external change due to lightning.
7. ^ Charles Steinmetz (Fellow, A. I. E. E. Chief Consulting Engineer,
General Electric Company, Schenectady, N. Y.). "Conmdenser Discharge
Through a General Gas Circuit". American Institute of Electrical Engineers.,
1922. Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers. New York:
American Institute of Electrical Engineers. Presented at the 10th Midwinter
Convention of the A. I. E. E., New York, N. Y., February 15–17, 1922.
8. ^ viz., the dissipation of electric energy by the resistance of the conductor
through its conversion into heat;
9. ^ Such as when it gives trouble by induction in telephone circuits or when
it reaches such high intensities as to puncture insulation, cause mechanical
motion, etc.
10. ^ such as an iron needle.
11. ^ a b c Theory and calculation of transient electric phenomena and
oscillations By Charles Proteus Steinmetz
12. ^ Speculation was made as to what the electric wave was, leading to the
contradictory deductions that for certain reasons space is considered as a gas of
infinitely low density, and for certain others as a solid.
13. ^ Dave Baarman and Joshua Schwannecke (2009-12-00). "Understanding
Wireless Power".
http://ecoupled.com/pdf/eCoupled_Understanding_Wireless_Power.pdf.
14. ^ Steinmetz, Charles Proteus (2008-08-29). Steinmetz, Dr. Charles
Proteus, Elementary Lectures on Electric Discharges, Waves, and Impulses, and
Other Transients, 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., 1914.
Books.google.com. http://books.google.com/?id=Q_ltAAAAMAAJ&dq=
%22Elementary+Lectures+on+Electric+Discharges,+Waves,+and+Impulses
%22&printsec=frontcover. Retrieved 2009-06-04.
15. ^ "Wireless charging, Adaptor die, Mar 5th 2009". Economist.com. 2008-
11-07. http://www.economist.com/science/tq/displayStory.cfm?
story_id=13174387. Retrieved 2009-06-04.
16. ^ Buley, Taylor (2009-01-09). "Wireless technologies are starting to
power devices, 01.09.09, 06:25 PM EST". Forbes.com.
http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/09/ces-wireless-power-tech-sciences-
cx_tb_0109power.html. Retrieved 2009-06-04.
17. ^ "Alternative Energy, From the unsustainable...to the unlimited".
EETimes.com.
http://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/cmp/eetimes_altenergy_20100621/.
18. ^ Patent Application PCT/CN2008/0728855
19. ^ Patent US7164255
20. ^ a b Norrie, H. S., "Induction Coils: How to make, use, and repair them".
Norman H. Schneider, 1907, New York. 4th edition.
21. ^ Electrical experimenter, January 1919. pg. 615
22. ^ Tesla: Man Out of Time By Margaret Cheney. Page 174
23. ^ Such as wireless lamps.
24. ^ Experiments with Alternate Currents of Very High Frequency and Their
Application to Methods of Artificial Illumination, AIEE, Columbia College, N.Y.,
May 20, 1891
25. ^ Experiments with Alternate Currents of High Potential and High
Frequency, IEE Address, London, February 1892
26. ^ a b "On Light and Other High Frequency Phenomena, Franklin Institute,
Philadelphia, February 1893, and National Electric Light Association, St. Louis,
March 1893
27. ^ Gernsback, Hugo. "Nikola Tesla and His Achievements," Electrical
Experimenter, January 1919. p. 615
28. ^ Cheney, Margaret. Tesla: Man Out of Time, p. 174
29. ^ Martin, T. C., & Tesla, N. (1894). Inventions, Researches and Writings
of Nikola Tesla, with special reference to his work in polyphase currents and high
potential lighting. New York: The Electrical Engineer. Page 188.
30. ^ Systems of Transmission of Electrical Energy, U.S. Patent No. 645,576,
March 20, 1900.
“In some cases when small amounts of energy are required the high elevation of
the terminals, and more particularly of the receiving-terminal D', may not be
necessary, since, especially when the frequency of the currents is very high, a
sufficient amount of energy may be collected at that terminal by electrostatic
induction from the upper air strata, which are rendered conducting by the active
terminal of the transmitter or through which the currents from the same are
conveyed."
I have to say here that when I filed the applications of September 2, 1897, for the
transmission of energy in which this method was disclosed, it was already clear to
me that I did not need to have terminals at such high elevation, but I never have,
above my signature, announced anything that I did not prove first. That is the
reason why no statement of mine was ever contradicted, and I do not think it will
be, because whenever I publish something I go through it first by experiment,
then from experiment I calculate, and when I have the theory and practice meet I
announce the results.
At that time I was absolutely sure that I could put up a commercial plant, if I
could do nothing else but what I had done in my laboratory on Houston Street; but
I had already calculated and found that I did not need great heights to apply this
method. My patent says that I break down the atmosphere "at or near" the
terminal. If my conducting atmosphere is 2 or 3 miles above the plant, I consider
this very near the terminal as compared to the distance of my receiving terminal,
which may be across the Pacific. That is simply an expression. . . .
Now, I have satisfied myself that I can construct plants in which I may produce,
per kilometer of the atmosphere, electric differences of potential of something like
50,000 or 60,000 volts, and at 50,000 or 60,000 volts that atmosphere must break
down and will become conductive.
So that, when I had explained this principle to Lord Kelvin, he became absolutely
convinced that I could do it; but Helmholtz was convinced from the very
beginning that I could do it. It took argumentation, however, and demonstration
by experiments, to convince Lord Kelvin.
"The earth is 4,000 miles radius. Around this conducting earth is an atmosphere.
The earth is a conductor; the atmosphere above is a conductor, only there is a little
stratum between the conducting atmosphere and the conducting earth which is
insulating. . . . Now, you realize right away that if you set up differences of
potential at one point, say, you will create in the media corresponding fluctuations
of potential. But, since the distance from the earth's surface to the conducting
atmosphere is minute, as compared with the distance of the receiver at 4,000
miles, say, you can readily see that the energy cannot travel along this curve and
get there, but will be immediately transformed into conduction currents, and these
currents will travel like currents over a wire with a return. The energy will be
recovered in the circuit, not by a beam that passes along this curve and is reflected
and absorbed, . . . but it will travel by conduction and will be recovered in this
way
77. ^ Apparatus for Transmitting Electrical Energy, Jan. 18, 1902, U.S. Patent
1,119,732, Dec. 1, 1914.
78. ^ One wireless system -- Two methods
First. The earth’s diameter passing through the pole should be an odd multiple of
the quarter wave length – that is, of the ratio between the velocity of light – and
four times the frequency of the currents.
Third. The most essential requirement is, however, that irrespective of frequency
the wave or wave-train should continue for a certain interval of time, which I have
estimated to be not less then [sic] one-twelfth or probably 0.08484 of a second
and which is taken in passing to and returning from the region diametrically
opposite the pole over the earth’s surface with a mean velocity of about four
hundred and seventy-one thousand two hundred and forty kilometers per second
[471,240 km/sec].
Science News
Share Blog Cite
Print Bookmark Email
See Also:
Matter & Energy
• Energy Technology
• Solar Energy
• Batteries
• Computer Science
• Mobile Computing
• Distributed Computing
Reference
• Electric power
• Battery (electricity)
• Mobile phone
• Computing power everywhere
The team members are Andre Kurs, Aristeidis Karalis, Robert Moffatt, Prof. Peter Fisher,
and Prof. John Joannopoulos (Francis Wright Davis Chair and director of ISN), led by
Prof. Marin Soljacic. Realizing their recent theoretical prediction, they were able to light
a 60W light bulb from a power source seven feet (more than two meters) away; there was
no physical connection between the source and the appliance. The MIT team refers to its
concept as "WiTricity" (as in wireless electricity). The work will be reported in the June
7 issue of Science Express, the advance online publication of the journal Science.
Late-night beeps
The story starts one late night a few years ago, with Soljacic (pronounced Soul-ya-
cheech) standing in his pajamas, staring at his cell phone on the kitchen counter. "It was
probably the sixth time that month that I was awakened by my cell phone beeping to let
me know that I had forgotten to charge it. It occurred to me that it would be so great if the
thing took care of its own charging." To make this possible, one would have to have a
way to transmit power wirelessly, so Soljacic started thinking about which physical
phenomena could help make this wish a reality.
Radiation methods
Various methods of transmitting power wirelessly have been known for centuries.
Perhaps the best known example is electromagnetic radiation, such as radio waves. While
such radiation is excellent for wireless transmission of information, it is not feasible to
use it for power transmission. Since radiation spreads in all directions, a vast majority of
power would end up being wasted into free space. One can envision using directed
electromagnetic radiation, such as lasers, but this is not very practical and can even be
dangerous. It requires an uninterrupted line of sight between the source and the device, as
well as a sophisticated tracking mechanism when the device is mobile.
In contrast, WiTricity is based on using coupled resonant objects. Two resonant objects
of the same resonant frequency tend to exchange energy efficiently, while interacting
weakly with extraneous off-resonant objects. A child on a swing is a good example of
this. A swing is a type of mechanical resonance, so only when the child pumps her legs at
the natural frequency of the swing is she able to impart substantial energy. Another
example involves acoustic resonances: Imagine a room with 100 identical wine glasses,
each filled with wine up to a different level, so they all have different resonant
frequencies. If an opera singer sings a sufficiently loud single note inside the room, a
glass of the corresponding frequency might accumulate sufficient energy to even explode,
while not influencing the other glasses. In any system of coupled resonators there often
exists a so-called "strongly coupled" regime of operation. If one ensures to operate in that
regime in a given system, the energy transfer can be very efficient.
While these considerations are universal, applying to all kinds of resonances (e.g.,
acoustic, mechanical, electromagnetic, etc.), the MIT team focused on one particular
type: magnetically coupled resonators. The team explored a system of two
electromagnetic resonators coupled mostly through their magnetic fields; they were able
to identify the strongly coupled regime in this system, even when the distance between
them was several times larger than the sizes of the resonant objects. This way, efficient
power transfer was enabled. Magnetic coupling is particularly suitable for everyday
applications because most common materials interact only very weakly with magnetic
fields, so interactions with extraneous environmental objects are suppressed even further.
"The fact that magnetic fields interact so weakly with biological organisms is also
important for safety considerations," Kurs, a graduate student in physics, points out.
The investigated design consists of two copper coils, each a self-resonant system. One of
the coils, attached to the power source, is the sending unit. Instead of irradiating the
environment with electromagnetic waves, it fills the space around it with a non-radiative
magnetic field oscillating at MHz frequencies. The non-radiative field mediates the
power exchange with the other coil (the receiving unit), which is specially designed to
resonate with the field. The resonant nature of the process ensures the strong interaction
between the sending unit and the receiving unit, while the interaction with the rest of the
environment is weak.
Moffatt, an MIT undergraduate in physics, explains: "The crucial advantage of using the
non-radiative field lies in the fact that most of the power not picked up by the receiving
coil remains bound to the vicinity of the sending unit, instead of being radiated into the
environment and lost." With such a design, power transfer has a limited range, and the
range would be shorter for smaller-size receivers. Still, for laptop-sized coils, power
levels more than sufficient to run a laptop can be transferred over room-sized distances
nearly omni-directionally and efficiently, irrespective of the geometry of the surrounding
space, even when environmental objects completely obstruct the line-of-sight between
the two coils.
Fisher points out: "As long as the laptop is in a room equipped with a source of such
wireless power, it would charge automatically, without having to be plugged in. In fact, it
would not even need a battery to operate inside of such a room." In the long run, this
could reduce our society's dependence on batteries, which are currently heavy and
expensive.
WiTricity is rooted in such well-known laws of physics that it makes one wonder why no
one thought of it before. "In the past, there was no great demand for such a system, so
people did not have a strong motivation to look into it," points out Joannopoulos, adding,
"Over the past several years, portable electronic devices, such as laptops, cell phones,
iPods and even household robots have become widespread, all of which require batteries
that need to be recharged often."
As for what the future holds, Soljacic adds, "Once, when my son was about three years
old, we visited his grandparents' house. They had a 20-year-old phone and my son picked
up the handset, asking, 'Dad, why is this phone attached with a cord to the wall"' That is
the mindset of a child growing up in a wireless world. My best response was, 'It is strange
and awkward, isn't it" Hopefully, we will be getting rid of some more wires, and also
batteries, soon.'"
This work was funded by the Army Research Office (Institute for Soldier
Nanotechnologies), National Science Foundation and the Department of Energy.
Wireless energy transfer does exactly what it says on the tin - it enables the powering of
devices and appliances without the need for wires and cables. It works by making use of
the principle of resonant coupling - devices and appliances use copper coils which, when
tuned to the correct frequency, resonate with one another.
One coil is plugged into the wall while another is attached to an electronic device. The
wall coil creates an electromagnetic field which resonates with the latter coil, which
generates some energy in the process which will power the particular electronic device.
Ads by Google
Make your own windturbine Free design software to make your own wind turbine
warlock.com.au/tools/bladecalc-2011
Dell XPS™ 14 @ Rs.51,900 Intel® Core™ i7, 4GB RAM+500GB HDD+ 2GB
Graphics. Pay in 6 Months EMI. Dell.com/XPS_Laptops
Any obstacles sitting between the device and the wall coil are inconsequential to the
power transfer, and human beings are unaffected because the human body does not
respond to magnetic fields.
A number of companies and academic institutions (including Intel and MIT) are involved
in a race to be the first to release marketable wireless energy packages, however, there
are a number of limitations to the full implementation of wireless energy transfer:
1. Size:the copper rings which create resonance and energy are simply too big for
them to be part of any wireless energy package.
2. Range: the range of wireless energy transfer is just a few metres, which is a major
hurdle.
3. Efficiency: wireless energy transfer ensures between 45% and 80% of the energy
put in is transferred, which is much less efficient than regular wired connections.
4. Cost:the cost of developing and implementing wireless energy networks means
that it would be too expensive for the end-user to afford at this point.
These limitations, however, do not mean that marketable wireless energy cannot be
achieved - already companies like Powermat have released a wireless charging 'mat' for
everyday mobile devices, with the promise of much more to come.
Read on
In line with this vision it would be safe to assume that one day a person would be able to
walk into a bar of coffee shop and would not only be able to have instant access to the
internet but would also enjoy any devices they have on them being powered or charging
automatically.
It does not seem that this would be very far from the truth, especially with companies like
Witricity promising marketable wireless power by the middle of 2011. Apart from the
commercial gain and its convenience, however, wireless power does offer to fight a more
noble cause as well.
The grandfather of wireless energy transfer, Nikola Tesla, in the 1890s pointed out that
one day all electronic devices would be able to harvest the electromagnetic energy which
was naturally present in space. To consider this presents one with a mind-blowing array
of possibilities. If one were able to create electronic devices which would harness the
energy in space, then one would have essentially created a renewable power source, and
the implications of that would be immense.
Fildes, J 'Wireless Energy Promise Powers Up' BBC News Report, 7 June 2007 online at
Minkel, J R 'Intel Gets Into Wireless Electricity Game' Scientific America, 22 August
2008 online at
Sutter, J D 'A Cordless Future for Electricity?' CNN News Report, 2 September 2009
online at
Ads by Google
Cal Manufacturing, Inc
Resistance Welding Cables Busbars, Laminated Shunts
www.calmfginc.com
Copyright Isham Jassat. Contact the author to obtain permission for republication.
Print Article | Share Article |
Recommend Article!
Comments
Mar 8, 2010 5:42 AM
Guest :
ITS GOOD. I HEARD ABOUT THIS FOR THE FIRST TIME .SO IT WAS VERY
INTERESTING FOR ME.
1
Ads by Google
Read more at Suite101: The Future of Wireless Energy Transfer: How Wireless Power
Will Change the World http://www.suite101.com/content/the-future-of-wireless-energy-
transfer-a207875#ixzz1HQ4gKgTI