Grabbed this info from Godlike Productions…they were the only one who has more info on

the Giant Objects around the Sun. The photos come from the (STEREO AHEAD, SOHO,
STEREO BEHIND AND GOES-14 satellites and FROM OBSERVATORIES ON THE
GROUND!!!….but check out the CRAP answer NASA gave this guy (in green) to explain
this!! COMPRESSION and COSMIC RAYS are supposed to be the cause for these objects in
the photos!!! What about the ground observatories that have picked these objects up?!?
LMAO!!!WAKE THE FUCK UP!!! If they feed/sell you shit WILL YOU EAT IT? BUY IT? I would
suggest following these links also!

Here is a nice image showing a sphere from another ground based observatory
5/4/2010...three o'clock position...click image for zoom.

[link to swrl.njit.edu]

UPDATE: 4/26/2010

Krispy71 has posted a thread showing spherical objects in the images which have recently
been released from the (SDO) Solar Dynamics Observatory...can't wait to see the images
updating minute by minute...or will that ever happen?

[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

Thanks again Krispy for your contribution.

UPDATE 3/05/10:Another amazing image from ground based Big Bear Solar Observatory.

[link to i556.photobucket.com]
UPDATE 02/21/2010: Below are two images taken just a few minutes apart according to
the timestamps...the first image is taken from Big Bear Solar Observatory which is in Big
Bear City, California (Earth) ...the second image is taken from SOHO satellite (space) which
is positioned between the Earth and the sun...It is my opinion that these are the same
spheres being detected by two completely different imaging devices at nearly the
same time...let it be known by all that I do not claim to know what they are...but it sure
has my attention.
UPDATE 02/20/2010: NOW SHOWING UP ON GROUND BASED OBSERVATORIES !
I made a new video of the "black dot" anomaly on the STEREO Behind images...It was very
hi-res on my laptop but lost a lot of resolution upon uploading...anyhow...here it is.

Here is an amazing video created by GLP user "tazzz". Great work.

Most recent thread summary by 2cents….

1) Original post exploded and sent thousands of intrigued readers to investigate

these NASA images.

2) Many more images began to be linked and posted with these objects including
NASA movies.
3) Creative people began to make videos showing comparisons of these objects
and now this topic is ablaze on many, many other forums and blogs.

4) Debunkers finally arrived and after a hard fought battle over many pages were
proven insignificant.

5) NASA responds with their typical “equipment malfunction” citing “image

compression” as the cause for the objects.

6) NASA changes story and stated that “cosmic rays” hitting the instruments
detector was causing these artifacts to show on the images.

7) At the same time as NASA’s announcement, all of their hi-res image databases
stopped updating and they announced a CCD BAKEOUT maintenance period. (In
short, they cut off our supply of recent hi-res images)

8) February 2nd 2010, CCD BAKEOUT is now over and new images are being
observed.

9) It was confirmed that these objects were being captured by at least four
different satellites separated by tens of millions of miles. (STEREO AHEAD, SOHO,
STEREO BEHIND AND GOES-14)

10) Spheres being captured at same time and at same location on the sun from
satellites and from GROUND BASED observatories.

11) I will try and post this summary often so people can stay tuned in with the
current facts, also many images, theories and storylines have arisen on this thread
so I would suggest you take your time to read as much of the thread as possible
but at least, periodically check the main page for updates.

Here is ORIGINAL POST:

(NOTE: These objects have been on every image since around Jan. 18th and are
moving around the sun even as we speak)

Somewhere around Jan. 18th, several objects starting appearing on many of the EIT images
both ahead and behind. Here are a few images but there are many, many more images to
research other than what I have linked here.

UPDATED 02/21/2010: (2cents opinion after the first 195 pages of this thread.)

OK...I have read every single word in this entire thread since the beginning as well as
looked at every image posted or linked...watched all videos except the few music videos
posted...
I have done my own research while the commited few have done an excellent job
manipulating images and making videos...thanks for all you've done (you know who you
are)

My conclusion at this point is this...after discovering the spherical objects on several

GROUND BASED observatory images...I have no clue as to what the hell those things
are...please...please...keep on looking and researching..........I think there's more we will be
finding
in the coming days. 2cents

This was posted on page 109

Here is NASA's explanation of them:

[link to www.colinandrews.net]

Dear Mr. Andrews -

(Sorry not to make this more original, but we've had a number of questions
about these features since the Deep Space Network Central Data Recorder
(CDR) failure last week, and this is a cut-and-paste that I've been using to reply to
a lot of them. No disrespect intended, but very busy currently with writing
proposals for a Senior Review that decides whether to continue funding our
missions. Please let me know if this isn't comprehensible.)

What you're seeing are compression artifacts, highly magnified. We have to

compress the images digitally in order to keep a good rate of taking them and still
be able to telemeter them back (across an increasing distance, which weakens the
signal and limits how much data we can send per unit time) to earth. The images
you are looking at in the video are "space weather beacon mode" images that are
telemetered down nearly continuously:

[link to stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov]

in near-realtime, and are both binned (undersampled spatially, down to 512 x 512
pixels) and heavily, lossily compressed digitally onboard (analogous to the various
JPEG compression settings on a digital camera, but much more severe). Then
they're made available on the Website in a variety of magnifications or "upresings"
which only magnify the artifacts. Usually, by now (that is, three days or more after
the data were obtained), we'd have the full-resolution (2048 x 2048 pixel) images,
which are much less heavily, but still lossily, compressed, and are played back to
a Deep Space Network (DSN) ground station via the high-gain antenna on one of
the STEREO spacecraft. Unfortunately, a piece of ground hardware at DSN failed,
and we're only now catching up on the full-resolution data from January 18 onward
--- except the lower-resolution (512 x 512) beacon mode data. People first started
seeing the odd images around that date, when there was a moderate solar
energetic particle event, but those up-resed images have now been replaced on
the SSC Website with the full resolution ones. DSN has caught us up to January
20, the last time I checked.

The compression artifacts are particularly obvious when a particle (cosmic ray or
solar energetic, charged particle) hits the CCD detector on the spacecraft
head-on. (Grazing hits show up as bright streaks.) The compression scheme has
a hard time mathematically representing sharp, single- or few-pixel features, and
you get a characteristic pattern of a bright dot in the middle of a compression
block (a subsection of the image) surrounded by a pattern of dark dots.

Best,
Joe Gurman

(Dr.) Joseph B. Gurman

STEREO Project Scientist
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 776788

:upload fou: :upload new:

 two: :Capture:
:gridgreen:

Discovered this link while doing some research and was blown away by what these people
were reporting 10 years ago.
[link to www.tmgnow.com]

I’m posting what I found on the link above..down below.

And the last point here… In the weeks before the Missile launch event, we saw
something amazing in the GOES images. It’s hard to believe that it wasn’t seen by
others. (Well, maybe it was. But nobody’s talking!). Several years ago, when the
Japanese solar satellite was open to the public, we picked up an incredible image. This
image revealed a huge ship orbiting the sun, with rays of light shining out from the sun
behind it. The picture below is one of the images that we have, revealing that ship. We
are unsure of the ship’s exact size, because we do not know it’s distance from the sun
or from the earth. But it’s large, as you will see! In fact, the idea that it’s orbiting the
sun may not be correct, it may have been, even in this image, closer to the earth. At
times we saw the great towers on the ship alter and seem to move from one position to
another on the craft. It may be a carrier or it may be some kind of refueling or energy
gathering operation or all of that. We don’t really know. But it remains clear that it was
there. Here’s that original image.

Our original article with more images is HERE.

UNEXPLAINED SOLAR
ANOMALY
by gary d. goodwin

(Please be aware! This page is large with many images and may take some time to download!)
Preface: The images that you are about to see are untouched and reprocessed in anyway
except where it is clearly stated that I have done so. In those cases I will explain to the best
of my ability the process that has taken place. Let me further reassure, you the reader that
I am in absolutely no way attempting to fool, trick or mislead you the reader. I have no
hidden agenda. The anomaly that you will see in these images were just as much a surprise
to me, as I am sure they will be to you. As a member and co-founder of THE
MILLENNIUM GROUP, I have no desire to suggest that these images represent anything
but anomalies, but let them 'speak' for themselves. And just like most of you, I am not a
degreed astrophysicist, so I cannot rule out that it is indeed a natural phenomenon. If there
is anyone with the ability to prove the true nature o fthese objects, I invite you to
immediately contact me and share your opinion (please keep the comments appropriate). It
is the explicit focus of this research group to seek out truth in science, and to do so by the
conventional scientific method of observation.

Setting The Time Line Scene:

In late 1995 Hale Bopp was publicly discovered and became the subject of debate that it
now is.

In late 1996 the rage over Chuck Shramek's *Companion* picture, and the great debate
over the Courtney Brown/Prudence Calabrese images was in full force, bringing world
recognition, thanks to the Art Bell Broadcasts.

One year after HB passed through our system on, May 4th 1998, The Millennium Group
brought into public recognition the arrival of the celestial object later named the Comet
SOHO J1.

On June 24 1998 The Millennium Group Research Team posted the very first shot of what
is now popularly known as "The ORCA". We thoroughly documented evidence for the
Probable New Solar System Object.

On February 11th 1999 The Millennium Group posted further evidence of The Probable
System Object, more commonly known as The ORCA.

I would like to add here that throughout this period of time there has been a dramatic
increase in natural destructive forces over the entire face of the earth. We have seen record
after record broken; fastest wind speed, most powerful hurricanes and tornadoes, powerful
earthquake increases in size and numbers, incredible temperature swings, and rapid
increases in melting and calfing of glaciers and ice shelves in the Arctic and Antarctica. Is
the timing a coincidence? Please! What do you think?

The Anomaly
I want to make it perfectly clear that the ORCA is NOT the same anomaly that I will
present in the images below. Since the advent of the ORCA (circa June 1998) we have been
intensely watching all of the available images of the sun. In October of 1998, we began
seeing a strange object in the lower left hand corner of the SOHO C2 images. At first we
thought it was simply an imaging anomaly, perhaps a wrinkle in a filter or a scratch on the
lens. We ignored it. But then we noticed that it would show up some of the time and not at
other times. There was initially no apparent pattern. It wasn't with any particular filter,
any particular exposure time nor any other expected variable. The only noticable variable
was time; It would be there for a few days and then it would be gone for a few days. The
image below is a typical SOHO C2 image showing the anomaly. You can see it in the lower
left hand corner of the picture. We simply call it the *Tower*. At the same time we began
seeing the Tower, in early October 1998 the gray blocks that you can see in all four corners
of the C2. They appear to have been placed there so as to cover up the Tower. You will also
notice that only the "tip" of the Tower appears to be showing. To myself, it appears to be
long and cylindrical and as if it were a "tube" that had been sliced off at an angle. You will
also notice that there appears to be another shorter tower next to it. In a five megabyte
movie that we have (too large for the page), relatively small bright pixels can be seen
coming from the left border of the image and going toward and down in to the tower.
Incredible images.

(This image has NOT been altered except to be shrunk by 50% and to add the red box)

The Tower was also seen in the image that we posted concerning the ORCA in February of
this year. You can see that the Tower has moved a bit and we appear to be seeing a
different aspect of it.
 (In this image there appears to be some type of filter laid over the image. We have not altered
this at all.)

Shortly after this image the Tower disappeared from the SOHO C2. In the next few days
we obtained the following image from the SXT site. As you can see this is an Xray image
from the satellite YOHKOH. In the lower right hand center you can see something that
again appears out of the ordinary. The anomaly is geometric, with extensions out of a
center at a right angle. Pay particular attention to the rays of light emanating from behind
the object. As if sun light were radiating through or around a cloud, leading me to think
that this object is NOT on the surface, but at some distance from the surface. Notice that
there are no other "sunspots" on the surface of the sun that appear geometric or that have
similar characteristics as this object. Finally we noticed something else very interesting
with this object in relation to the Tower that we had previously seen in the SOHO C2
images. You will recall that the Tower in the C2 images appeared to have a double or
multiple tower. This image has an extension to the left, that is a double tower. (By the way -
this makes two DIFFERENT satellites displaying similar anomalies).
(This image was cropped from the SXT EIT composite. No other processing done to this image
on our end)

Today I received this email from Don Carros. Don has some expertise in imaging and I was
shocked to see his evaluation of the above image.

Gary:

I started the review of the digital image you sent. It is the SXT image of
2-16-99. Being the skeptic in residence I looked at the image thinking I was
going to come away with a simple explanation. NOT SO!

First, we are reviewing a second or third generation rendering of an original

CCD image from YOHKOH. So....there is a lot to be desired. I used the Gnu Image
Processor (GIMP) under Linux to tear the image apart. Right now I cannot
explain just what it is that I am seeing.
In general the strange object appears near sunspot 8458. There is something
there. I will try to send the details of the analysis under separate cover
later. It has shape. The strange mechanical looking structure does NOT appear to
be a digital aberration as it is several pixels wide and there is evidence of
tonal (color) gradation near the edges. This implies that someone did not put it
there either without considerable effort.

Most of the detail is is lost since the image is fairly dark and the object is
even darker. Most of the detail falls within the range of 10-50 out of a range
of 0-255 shades of gray, so it is fairly dark.

I am having trouble explaining away the rays that appear to radiate from beneath
the object. I will need to spend more time to be sure the rays do NOT radiate
from the object itself versus are reflected from beneath as you suggested. The
problem I have with your theory is that is the object appears that dark, How
can it radiate light?

Don

Two days later, the YOHKOH image showed absolutely no object by sunspot #8458 (this
composite is available if anyone desires to compare it). Then on March 3rd an associated
anomaly began to appear coming from around the back of the solar disk. You can see it
beginning to peek around the upper left side of the solar disk. The object is extended and
geometric, and again unnatural appearing.
(This image was cropped from the SXT EIT composite. No other processing done to this image
on our end)

Then today, April 22nd 1999, the anomaly appeared again in the YOHKOH images. This
time it appeared to be moving to the opposite side of the solar disk and was lit up by the
radiation from the sun. This is a cropped blow up of the image, posted just as it was on the
original web site.
There has been one other associated anomaly that was recently brought to our attention by
a friend, Matthew Ridgway. The associated anomaly does not move around the sun as the
sun rotates and seems to stay put in the same area over time. It also seen on several
different imaging platforms. And once again I am reminded of the Tower that we watched
off and on for several months in the SOHO C2 images.
What is not displayed in these images are periodic anomalies occurring at the distant end
of the object, that seem to be in line with the object, much like in the five megabyte movie.
Please keep in mind that each of the above images were taken on a separate day, meaning
that sun is continuing to rotate. But the anomaly remains in the same position.

These are only a few of the images that we have that show these anomalies. We literally
have dozens of images that show similar, if not the same objects. It is indeed a fascinating
universe that we exist in. I am truly unable to explain the things that we are seeing in these
images. However, I am not going to keep them from the public. we need as many eyes to see
these anomalies as possible. Perhaps someone has an explanation!

One more point and one more picture:

After watching this object/anomaly over the past few months, seeing the multiple towers
and extensions, I remember one special image from mid/late 1997 of Hale Bopp. At the
time, I had no real explanation for what I saw. But after seeing these anomalies I realized
that there was quite a remarkable similarity between the Tower(s) and the companion that
was accompanying Hale Bopp in the image. Note the unnatural extensions that appear to
be coming out of the companion. There also appears to be a "field" surrounding the entire
companion. Now it was never my intention to exploit or to even relate the two, but look and
see if you don't see the similarities! This image was taken by an amateur astronomer who
receives a stipend from NASA and who, by the way at the time, emailed me and insisted
that I remove the image from my site. I didn't remove it - only his name. Never heard from
him again!
 (The only thing that I have done to this image, since I acquired it was to turn it upside down!)

On to part TWO
I would highly recommend that you re-read part one of this report, before going
on!

This image was picked up by our research team from the YOHKOH satellite site
back in February of 1999. The object that is obvious in the near center of the
image has been seen numerous times since that date, on various different images,
from different satelllites. (note what appears to be a stream of energy emanating
from the top of the object out of view to the north-up).

We would also like to remind you of this image, that has been persistent on
SOHO's EIT images (the dates are in the upper left hand corner of each image and
are all 1999).
The explainations for these two images have always been; "it's a sunspot", "It's
pixilation", or "It's a burn in on the screen". Of course in the lwoer image, it's
sometimes there and sometimes not.

This additional incredible image from Matt Ridgway seems to support the
existence of these objects. Here's what he said:

"I've found some highly-suggestive pics regarding that solar object I pointed out
several months ago. Now, as you might remember, I sent a quick note to the guys
at SOHO and they sent a quick one back saying the object was a flaw in the
viewing lense, which is the obvious conclusion. Now, the only trouble with that
explaination is that the object doesn't show up on ALL the SOHO picks, but only on
the few that utilise particular radiation bands, like the x-ray series and so on. BUT,
a week or so ago I happened upon THIS pic, (below) which I believe clearly shows
the object, this time from a vantage point that is almost straight on, and you can
tell that the 'object(s)' here are clearly pointing toward the viewer, have a
differential 'brightening' between the two, and are obviously something 'in the
frame' and not 'on the frame'... Could it be possible that this object has been
artificially placed in orbit around the sun to act as a sort of lightning rod for these
CME's, to attract and bleed them off in order to minimize the risk during the solar
maximum? What sort of 'object' could withstand such abuse? I have no idea."
Note the arc that travels between the two objects or between the two extensions
of one object!

The following picture, provided to us by another reader, appears remarkably

similar to the objects in the image above. The horizontal line through the object, is
a line of reference put there by the SOHO team for measurement purposes. This
suggests that the folks from NASA are very aware of these objects just as we are!
This final comment from M-Core Member, Ray Ward, seems to pull together our
beliefs concerning what we are seeing here:

"I am in awe of these eit composite images that I we have been following. This is truly the
best shot yet of some- thing electrical going on, and not exactly a natural thing either. The
arc shows so clearly what we have seen elsewhere, that this thing is a mechanical device
meant to collect, store(possibly), and redirect the energy it receives to somewhere else. The
best candidate I know of at this time is that object we always see on the ecliptic that seems
to be in our orbit but on the far side of the sun. I cannot imagine what must be going on.
Its obvious that the need for extra energy is there. Or is it necessary for our own well-
being? As you know, the thing is impervious to the flares of the sun and one can only
surmise that this thing is not natural since it exhibits the characteristics of an intelligently
controlled machine. The size of the tubes and the fact that they are transparent suggest
that some form of bending of the energy transmission takes place. The relative sizes of the
tubes in relation to one another suggest that this is a broadband frequency gathering device
that collects the energy in the xray region, the microwave region, and then some in order to
redirect the "beaming" of the energy at a right angle to some object around the corner of
the sun and that lies behind it.

This object, judging by the oscillations in its position appears to be in virtually the same
orbit as our planet and may be an object that lies at one of the 5 lagrangian points recently
discussed in the NASA press release, that is on the opposite side of our orbit around the
sun. Also, the interior of the body in the Feb,1999 image is deep enough to contain a large
enough right angle bend to act as a good conduit for this energy to go through in the helix
pattern that is so charac- teristic for such energy that rides the outer skin of such tubes.
Its too bad that they have to go and erase the magnetic field lines that seem to go from the
tower to the body that is clearly shown many times in the C3 images and the C2 images.
What a pity.

The thing that most interests me at this time is the nature of this body on the far side of the
sun. I would wonder as to its true nature, that is whether is a true planet or what else.
Since it did not seem to be there before Hale- Bopp, my vote goes to its being a large
artificial object that came in with the comet. Whether its a machine or perhaps even
inhabited is open to just guesswork at this time. The same goes for this tower thing we
have been seeing for some time. I suppose it could be inhabited since it seems to be
immune to anything the sun can throw at it, but it would not be necessary either for its
obvious this thing has excellent control of its position and direction of travel and can move
quickly when it has to. It velocity capability has to be at least 1 million miles an hour to be
able to play this game of catch the flare energy. The neat thing about this machine is that it
is obviously utilizing the same energy for propulsion as it is using for its control while at the
same time redirecting the energy that it "catches". I suspect that this thing has a rather
simple feedback system that simply allows it to move with the push of the redirected energy
beam while at the same time perhaps deriving control by a simple opposition to the spin
direction of the flare energy being expelled. If this is the case, then complex circuitry
involving vulnerable computers is not necessary. Sort of like a fuzzy logic in a way. With
such large charges involved and the distances much closer than what we might envision, it
is perhaps not necessary to worry about tight tolerances since the electrical charges
involved would react on their own without any interference whatsoever. So, if this thing
were out of tolerance by 10%in position it might not matter since the charges would
override something of much greater magnitude of error or distance, angles in this case. So
the error of 10% in this case would be insignificant as the forces are so much greater and
could override perhaps 100% error at the distances we see involved with this thing. The
thrust mechanism would simply utilize the thrust of the redirecting of the energy to the
other body, that is,using the simple push of the energy being expelled to the other side of
the sun. That would allow it to remain in position upon capture by the flare and there you
have one side being attracted to the sun via the flare and the counter force simply the
explusion of the magnetic lines of force to the other body. This concept reminds me of the
interstellar ram jet concept that I saw a couple of decades or more ago. You have an engine
with no moving parts that simply plows its way through the gases of space by combustion in
the rear of the engine. In the case of this tower, it uses a similar concept, but needs no
combustion since the field strengths involved pull the flare energy through the tubes. I
suppose on further thought the machine may not be inhabited out of a more aethetic type
of reason rather than a technological one. Since the body on the other side of the sun is at
our distance, it would much more likely be inhabited since the requirements for life support
would be easily met.

I guess I am digressing a lot as I write this but it seems necessary to point out that it is
much easier to deal with plasma in space than on earth where oxidation can take place.
With the absence of air or oxygen, and in the presence of only charged particles due only to
the high heat needed to cause these gases to become plasma, things can be dealt with in a
more forgiving fashion and without the tolerances needed here on earth. Already using
the electromagnetic fields that the sun has and utilizing the property of helical type
discharges it is much easier to capture large amounts of plasma than just going into space
and trying to collect it. This machine already has it collected for it due to the above
properties. So, instead of looking outward at the stars, we need to look inward, toward the
sun, for our propulsion. It would be much more easily accomplished there than in the far
reaches of space.
Something else comes to mind in this collection of plasma. I am sure you have heard of the
recent development of transparent aluminum. I maybe am showing a lot of ignorance but it
seems to me that something made of this transparent aluminum would much more easily
absorb the energy in these flares since some of the filters used are the same. This type of
tower would facilitate the collection of that particular frequency of energy since it would
more easily penetrate this type of structure and be allowed to travel down the tube by the
general flow already generated by this type of machine. It just might simply be a fine tuning
for efficiency of collection in addition to the general principles that are utilized for this thing.
In addition, the angle of the tower is roughly 30 degrees in angle at the top, looking at the
side of the tower. This is in the range of angles that we normally see in crystalline
structures, so this angle is obvious. Add to that the circular aspect of the tower and this,
again,adds another aspect to the design of the tower for more ease in collection of energy in
the flare. It is a crude way of collection of energy into a 90 degree bend and the more
gentle bend is in the interior of the machine for less loss of transmission of the energy thus
obtained. It may also be that once the process of collection commences, that the process
becomes more efficient due to the inherent initial 90 degree bend into the tube by the
bending of the entire stream of particles into the tower. Once the flux tube from the sun is
bent properly into the tower, the rest of the flare will follow the same path since it is one of
least resistance.

I know this is a lot of speculation, but, when one can figure all of these details into the
tower design, and have a plausible explanation for them, then that entire concept looks that
much more plausible. I don't know if this is some form of Occam's razor or not. It just
seems that a bunch of simple things observed separately and matched to a particular shape
make that thing much more plausible, far beyond chance that such a thing could exist as we
are envisioning it. It just seems to have a ring of truth to it. Well, I hope this is fuel for
thought, ha,ha.
Ray

Anyone care to comment?

gary d. goodwin

STILL WANNA EAT THE SHIT They’re FEEDING YOU?!?!?