Microsoft Outlook: From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments

Microsoft Outlook
From: (b)(6), (b)(7)(C)
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 11:39 AM
To: (b)(6), (b)(7)(C)
Subject: RE: Cook County event brief
Attachments: Cook County Event Brief 4mar10 with (b)(6), (b)(7... comments.doc; chicago/cook county doc
Here’s my quick look!
From: (b)(6), (b)(7)(C)
To: (b)(6), (b)(7)(C)
Subject: Cook County event brief
(b)(6), (b... ,
Can you take a look at the Cook County event brief and fill in any of the highlighted areas? We can get
the rest from Randi.
Thanks,
(b)(6), (b)(7)...
12/23/2010
ICE FOIA 10-2674.0011912

Microsoft Outlook
From: (b)(6); (b)(7)(C)
To: ' (b)(6); (b)(7)(C)

(b)(6); (b)(7)(C) '
Cc: (b)(6); (b)(7)(C)

(b)(6); (b)(7)(C) ;' (b)(6); (b)(7)(C)
(b)(6); (b)(7)(C) '; 'Greenberg, Randi L'; ' (b)(6); (b)(7)(C) '; (b)(6); (b)(7)(C)
Subject: chicago/cook county doc
Attachments: CHI APPROACH_2010-02-09.doc
(b)(6); (b)... , here you go!
A couple of quick observations on questions that may arise when shared with Mr. Venturella. Perhaps
the document originator(s) have responses?
(b)(5)
Hope helpful.
(b)(6); (b...
From: (b)(6); (b)(7)(C)

(b)(6); (b)(7)(C) [mailto: (b)(6); (b)... (b)(6);
(b)(6);(b)(7)(C)
(b)(7)(C) ]
To: (b)(6); (b)(7)(C)
Subject: RE: Secretary Napolitano Budget Hearings
(b)(6); (b... ,
Thank you--
On a separate note—can you send me the Cook County document highlighting the SC sensitivities in that
area? I don’t think you were the originator of the document, it may have come from Deployment
From: (b)(6); (b)(7)(C) [mailto: (b)(6); (... (b)(6); (b)(7)(C) ]
To: (b)(6); (b)(7)(C) ; Greenberg, Randi L; (b)(6); (b)(7)(C) ; (b)(6); (b)(7)(C)

(b)(6); (b)(7)(C) ; (b)(6);
(b)(6); (b)(7)(C)
(b)(7)(C) ;
(b)(6);
(b)(6); (b)(7)(C)
(b)(7)(C) ; (b)(6); (b)(7)... , (b)(6); (b)(... ; (b)(6); (b)(7)... , (b)(6); (b)(... B (CTR); (b)(6); (b)... , (b)(6); (... ; (b)(6); (b)(7)(C) ;
(b)(6); (b)(7)(C) ; (b)(6); (b)(7)(C) ; (b)(6); (b)(7)(C)
12/23/2010
ICE FOIA 10-2674.0011913

Please find attached a brief summary document that highlights SC references in the Secretary’s written
testimony, opening statements, and hearing question and answer. There are some interesting pieces on the use
of “dangerous” and what SC does/how it deploys.
I understand A/S Morton goes up to House Approps Homeland Subcom on March 11. Don’t know about Senate,
but will circle back when I do.
From: (b)(6); (b)(7)(C)
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 9:53 AM
To: (b)(6); (b)(7)(C) ; 'Greenberg, Randi L'; ' (b)(6); (b)(7)(C) '; ' (b)(6); (b)(7)(C)
(b)(6); (b)(7)(C) '; (b)(6); (b)(5)
(b)(6); (b)(7)(C)
(b)(7)(C) ; '
(b)(6);
(b)(6); (b)(7)(C)
(b)(7)(C) '; ' (b)(6); (b)(7)... , (b)(6); (b)(... '; ' (b)(6); (b)(7)(... , (b)(6); (b)(7)(C) (CTR)'; ' (b)(6); (b)... , (b)(6); (... '; ' (b)(6); (b)(7)(C) '; (b)(6); (b)(...
; ' (b)(6); (b)(7)(C) '
In case you haven’t noticed, this morning’s hearing was bumped back to a 10:30am start.
From: (b)(6); (b)(7)(C)
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 11:28 PM
To: Greenberg, Randi L; (b)(6); (b)(7)(C) ; (b)(6); (b)(7)(C)

(b)(6); (b)(7)(C) ; (b)(6);
(b)(6); (b)(7)(C)
(b)(7)(C) ; (b)(6);
(b)(6); (b)(7)(C)
(b)(7)(C) ;
' (b)(6); (b)(7)... , (b)(6); (b)(... '; (b)(6); (b)(7)... , (b)(6); (b)(... B (CTR); (b)(6); (b)... , (b)(6); (b... ; (b)(6); (b)(7)(C) ; (b)(6); (b)(7)(C) ;
(b)(6); (b)(7)(C)
Cc: (b)(6); (b)(7)(C)
Subject: Secretary Napolitano Budget Hearings
All,
Sorry for the short notice. However, wanted to ensure that tomorrow and Thursday's Secretary Napolitano
Fiscal Year 2010 budget hearings were on your radars.
I'll be watching and listening whenever possible; but, I definitely welcome some support in this area. The
hearings are likely to be long as they'll cover the Department's entire budget request. I'd be surprised, however,
if Secure Communities does not come up in all of them.
The schedule is as follows:
 Wednesday, February 24, at 9:30am - Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee
WEBCAST <http://hsgac.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.LiveStream>
 Wednesday, February 24, at 2:00pm - Senate Appropriations Committee, Homeland Security
Subcommittee WEBCAST <http://appropriations.senate.gov/>
 Thursday, February 25, at 10:30am - House Appropriations Committee, Homeland Security
Subcommittee WEBCAST from here: <http://appropriations.house.gov/Subcommittees/sub_dhs.shtml>
 Thursday, February 25, at 2:00pm - House Homeland Security Committee WEBCAST from here:
<http://hsc.house.gov/>
Please let me know if you're inclined to watch.
Thanks!
(b)(6); (b...
12/23/2010
ICE FOIA 10-2674.0011914

(b)(6); (b)(7)(C)(b)(6); (b...
Information Experts
(b)(6); (b)(7)(C) cell
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee.
Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be
unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are subject to the terms
and conditions expressed in the agreement contract.
12/23/2010
ICE FOIA 10-2674.0011915

Pre-Decisional Deliberative Material—FOIA Exempt
(b)(5)
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY / LAW ENFORCEMENT SENSITIVE
Tuesday, February 09, 2010 Page 1
Draft for Client Review
ICE FOIA 10-2674.0011916

(b)(5)
ICE FOIA 10-2674.0011917

(b)(5)
ICE FOIA 10-2674.0011918

(b)(5)
ICE FOIA 10-2674.0011919

(b)(5)
ICE FOIA 10-2674.0011920

(b)(5)
ICE FOIA 10-2674.0011921

(b)(5)
ICE FOIA 10-2674.0011922

(b)(5)
ICE FOIA 10-2674.0011923

We ask only that you honor our detainers when we file them against a removable
criminal alien in your custody. We in turn commit to responding promptly when
contacted to accept custody of that alien.
5. Exchange of fingerprint information is nothing new—
Federal immigration authorities have been receiving rap sheet kickbacks on arrested
aliens for decades. What is fundamentally different about SC is speed and accuracy,
both made possible by technological advances and the use of biometrics. Under the old
system, rapsheet kickbacks took weeks or months for our field offices to receive, often
with the consequence that the individual had posted bond and fled or otherwise become
unlocatable. Using the biometric interoperability capacities made possible by linkages
between local and state LEA systems, CJIS, and federal immigration biometric and
biographic databases, we can identify a removable criminal alien who has been arrested
by your agency within hours, giving us the opportunity to file a detainer while the alien
is still in custody, and to take effective action once criminal justice proceedings are
complete. Selective use of such detainers on the worst offenders helps close the
‘revolving door’ of the criminal justice system by which dangerous criminal aliens have
in the past ended up back in the streets of your community.
6. Biometric interoperability under SC is a part of the larger CJIS Next Generation
Identification (NGI) initiative—
CJIS is phasing in deployment of a host of new biometric interoperability capabilities
to state and local LEAs. Deployment of these enhanced capacities will be completed
nationwide by 2013. SC is just one – the first – of these many additional information
streams being made available to assist LEAs at every level, to fully and accurately
identify suspects in their custody. Instead of just flipping the switch in 2013, signing
on to SC now is an opportunity for your officers to see the future and become
comfortable with it, before multiple-menu NGI activation by CJIS.
7. What you choose to do with Immigration Alien Responses (IARs) is up to you—
When biometric information generates a hit in federal immigration databases, the
resulting information is passed back, through CJIS and the SIB, to the arresting agency.
That information is returned as an IAR. As we have stated, providing you that
information does not entail any expectation of action on your part. What is more, as we
have already noted, IARs are only the first of many additional informational messages
you can expect to receive under CJIS NGI.
If you do not wish to receive the IAR, you may work with your SIB to turn it off at the
appropriate ORI(s). We would caution that in making a decision not to receive IAR
information, your officers may find themselves deprived of substantive information
ICE FOIA 10-2674.0011924

relating to an arrested subject’s true identity, place of origin, and other pertinent data of
significant law enforcement value.
8. Interoperability works with your existing booking process—
Since Interoperability leverages existing communication channels, no major changes
are required, and no substantive expenses are incurred, for your agency to benefit from
this capability.
IX. Other Issues and Concerns that May Arise
There appear to be at least three major points of concern. They are expressed here without
regard to any priority order, along with suggested responses:
1. Doubts about, or disagreement with, the 287(g) program—
Response You need to know that Secure Communities is fundamentally different than
the Section 287(g) cross-designation program. SC asks no police officer to make
decisions about, or act upon, an arrestee’s citizenship or immigration status. In this
way, LEAs are free to do their job; ICE is free to do its job.
2. Future immigration reform legislation might provide individuals a path toward
legal status—
Response Even in the event that immigration reform legislation is passed, it is unlikely
that aliens convicted of any but the most insignificant crimes will be eligible to apply
for legalized status.
3. We are aware of concern by NGOs that the initiative might result in racial
profiling by police officers—
Response Allegations of racial profiling are taken seriously, and mechanisms exist for
any alien who believes that he or she has been a victim of profiling to report the alleged
misconduct to the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Inspector General. In
most LEAs, including yours, there are also parallel mechanisms to report inappropriate
conduct or activity on the part of police officers, as well as policies and training in
place to prevent racial profiling. We have seen no instances of profiling in any location
where interoperability has been deployed, although we remain vigilant against the
possibility.
There is no empirical basis to believe that Secure Communities would encourage or
result in such inappropriate conduct. To the contrary, it is entirely possible that
locations where interoperability has been deployed would be more likely to detect such
a practice on the part of their officers by monitoring on a routine basis the responses
(IARs) received from the LESC to determine inappropriate patterns and anomalies
instead of the one-to-one relationship that should exist between transmissions and
responses.
ICE FOIA 10-2674.0011925

We also believe that establishing a baseline of arrest statistics based on nationality, race
and ethnicity prior to implementing SC, and periodically comparing the statistics post-
implementation to assure there are no substantial discrepancies, will continue to affirm
the fundamental fairness in the way the program is being carried out.
X. Chicago – Specific Leadership Information
1. Administration—Rahm Emanuel is the White House Chief of Staff. Prior to joining the
Obama Administration, Mr. Emanuel was a Member of Congress representing the fifth
district of Illinois, and was Chairman of the House Democratic Caucus.
2. City of Chicago—
a. The present Mayor is Richard M. Daley, a Democrat first elected in 1989. Mr.
Daley is the son of Richard J. Daley, also a long-time mayor of Chicago.
b. The Superintendant of Police since 2008 is Jody P. Weiss, a former FBI agent,
who took the position after his predecessor stepped down amid community
tensions and allegations of endemic brutality. Mr. Weiss is only the second chief
of police ever selected from outside CPD’s ranks. Although Mr. Weiss’s attitude
toward SC is unknown, it can be presumed that having been a federal law
enforcement officer, he will quickly comprehend the benefits and mechanics of
the program, although he will of course be obliged to follow the course laid out by
his political leaders in the city.
3. Cook County—
a. The President of the Cook County Board of Commissioners is Todd H. Stroger; a
Democrat, like Mr. Daley.
b. The Cook County Sheriff is Thomas Dart, who is one of the longest-serving of
incumbent Illinois sheriffs. To date, he has exhibited neither support nor
enthusiasm for SC, though whether this reflects his personal views or a
recognition of local politics is a matter of conjecture.
ICE FOIA 10-2674.0011926

Meeting with the Cook County Sherriff’s Office
DATE/TIME: March 4, 2010 TIME?
LOCATION: TBD
OBJECTIVES:
 Solicit support from Cook County for deployment of SC.
 NEED TO GET FROM RANDI
BACKGROUND:
 NEED
Comment [TC1]: Suggest using pages 2 and 3 of
the Chicago strategy document
DECISION POINTS/ASKS:
Comment [TC2]: I think “asks” is the same as
objectives.
 Solicit support from Cook County for deployment of SC.
PARTICIPANTS:
 From DRO?
 From Cook County?
ATTACHMENTS:
 Agenda
 LEA Presentation and talking points
 Bios?
 Cook County White Paper

Comment [TC3]: I asked some questions on this
document that Dave Venturella should have
 Media Analysis
answers to before he goes. Very scary the idea of
 Sanctuary ordinances
tossing out the “we’ll just flip the switch” when
there has been _no_ upward internal briefing on
o Cook County
that to my knowledge.
o Chicago
 MOA signed with Illinois
 SC Background
o SOPs
o Interoperability Stats
o SC FAQs
o LEA Fact Sheet
HAND-OUTS:
 LEA outreach packet
 MOA signed with Illinois
 SOPs
 LEA Benefits Fact Sheet
 SC Brochure
ICE FOIA 10-2674.0011927

On-site Logistics Contact: TBD
ICE FOIA 10-2674.0011928

Microsoft Outlook: From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originalbeschreibung:

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Microsoft Outlook: From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Microsoft Outlook

From: (b)(6), (b)(7)(C)

Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 11:39 AM

To: (b)(6), (b)(7)(C)

Subject: RE: Cook County event brief

Here’s my quick look!

From: (b)(6), (b)(7)(C)

Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 11:20 AM

To: (b)(6), (b)(7)(C)

Subject: Cook County event brief

the rest from Randi.

ICE FOIA 10-2674.0011912

From: (b)(6); (b)(7)(C)

Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 11:24 AM

To: ' (b)(6); (b)(7)(C)

Cc: (b)(6); (b)(7)(C)

Subject: chicago/cook county doc

Attachments: CHI APPROACH_2010-02-09.doc

(b)(6); (b)... , here you go!

the document originator(s) have responses?

From: (b)(6); (b)(7)(C)

Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 10:25 AM

To: (b)(6); (b)(7)(C)

Subject: RE: Secretary Napolitano Budget Hearings

From: (b)(6); (b)(7)(C) [mailto: (b)(6); (... (b)(6); (b)(7)(C) ]

Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 10:23 AM

To: (b)(6); (b)(7)(C) ; Greenberg, Randi L; (b)(6); (b)(7)(C) ; (b)(6); (b)(7)(C)

(b)(6); (b)(7)(C) ; (b)(6); (b)(7)(C) ; (b)(6); (b)(7)(C)

Subject: RE: Secretary Napolitano Budget Hearings

ICE FOIA 10-2674.0011913

of “dangerous” and what SC does/how it deploys.

but will circle back when I do.

From: (b)(6); (b)(7)(C)

Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 9:53 AM

; ' (b)(6); (b)(7)(C) '

Subject: RE: Secretary Napolitano Budget Hearings

From: (b)(6); (b)(7)(C)

Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 11:28 PM

To: Greenberg, Randi L; (b)(6); (b)(7)(C) ; (b)(6); (b)(7)(C)

Cc: (b)(6); (b)(7)(C)

Subject: Secretary Napolitano Budget Hearings

Fiscal Year 2010 budget hearings were on your radars.

if Secure Communities does not come up in all of them.

The schedule is as follows:

 Wednesday, February 24, at 2:00pm - Senate Appropriations Committee, Homeland Security

Subcommittee WEBCAST <http://appropriations.senate.gov/>

 Thursday, February 25, at 10:30am - House Appropriations Committee, Homeland Security

Subcommittee WEBCAST from here: <http://appropriations.house.gov/Subcommittees/sub_dhs.shtml>

Please let me know if you're inclined to watch.

ICE FOIA 10-2674.0011914

(b)(6); (b)(7)(C) cell

and conditions expressed in the agreement contract.

ICE FOIA 10-2674.0011915

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY / LAW ENFORCEMENT SENSITIVE

Tuesday, February 09, 2010 Page 1

Draft for Client Review

ICE FOIA 10-2674.0011916

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY / LAW ENFORCEMENT SENSITIVE

Tuesday, February 09, 2010 Page 2

Draft for Client Review

ICE FOIA 10-2674.0011917

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY / LAW ENFORCEMENT SENSITIVE