Stan Meyer Bifilar Chokes

The chokes, power coils, etc.. in Meyer's circuits seemed to have always been very confusing to
many people. More people today are understanding how the chokes were designed by simply
reading the tech brief that has been under all our noses the whole time.

Several people in the The H2earth Institute - A Virtual Center of Excellence in Waterfuel
Technology such as Josh and others are looking at this very closely. I was surprised to find so
many ideas about how the chokes are designed considering the fact that the text descriptions and
diagrams in the WFC tech brief are very, very clear.

Upon further examination, these are my comments, which may be right or wrong, I don't know but
they make sense to me

Here is the tech brief on the water fuel cell by Meyer:

http://www.esmhome.org/library/stan-...ical-brief.pdf

Below are a few tidbits from the tech brief on the bifilar, arrangement, purpose, construction,
specs, etc...

Page 6-3

"Resonant Choke Coils (56/62) of Figure (3-23) (Memo WFC 422 DA) are composed of 430F or
430FR inductance stainless steel film coated (hi dielectric value) wire (typically .004 Ga. or
smaller) which are axially (spiralled) Bifilar wound about core bobbin (502), forming individual
spiral-wrap (inner to outer circumference and being equally-length) coils (501a xxx 501n)
electrically connected in sequencial order to form resistive pickup coil (503)."

1
choke #56 is drawn incorrectly - they are wrapped in the same direction. I'll get to that later.

2
from page 7-5

Both Inductors (LI/L2) are Bifilar wound in equal length to optimize the electromagnetic field
strength (FL) in equal electromagnetic intensity (FLI = FL2) to encourage and promote "Electron
Bounce" phenomenon (700) of Figure (7-9) while adjusting (programmable pulse wave-form)
input signal Pulse-Frequency (49a xx 49n) to "tune-in" to the "dielectric property" (Re) of water
(85) ... causing amp flow to be reduce to a minimum value while allowing voltage potential (627)
of Figure (7-7) to go toward infinity if the electronic components would allow it to happen, as
graphically illustrated in (750) of Figure (7-14).

3
page 7-11

"each choke-coil (LIIL2) being of the same impedance value since both coil-wraps (56/62) are
Bifilar wound together onto a single spool-bobbin,"

page 10-1

"The Amp Inhibiting Circuit (970) of Figure (10-1) as to (690) of Figure (7-8) is composed of two
copper wires "Bifilar" wound (wrapped) about a magnetic induction core to allow amp restriction
(minimizing current leakage) while encouraging "Voltage Potential"(Va xxx V n) across the water
molecule to perform WFC "Electrical Polarization Process", as so illustrated in Figure (7-1) WFC
memo (426) titled VIC Matrix Circuit."

4
page 10-2

"VIC Bifilar Wrap Coil-Assembly (10-3B) and VIC Dual Coil Wrap-Assembly (10-3A) both utilize
either "E"& “I” and "U" Inductance Core configurations to concentrate Mutual Inductance Fields
(Rp l/Rp2) in order to optimize Amp Inhibiting Process (750) of Figure (7-14). "E" “I” core shape

(10-3B) is most preferable since amp spike surge is minimize during repetitive pulsing
operations."

5
page 10-4

"Increasing energy-yield (16/gtnt) still further (xxx 16/gtntnl+ 16/gtntn2 + 16/gtntn ... etc.) is
accomplished by increasing the number of Resonant Charging Choke Stages (xxx 56/62n +
56/62n 1+ 56/62n2 + 56/62n ... etc. -S- xxx SS56/62n + SS56/62nl + SS56/62n2 + SS56/62n ...
etc.) of Figure (10-4) in "Sequential Order" ( -S-) since the total number of Multi-Coil Magnet
bifilar coils (56/62a xxx 56/62n) serially electrically connected together are sequentially electrically
linked to an equal number of serially electrically aligned Stainless Steel Resonant Coils
(SS/56/62a xxx SS/56/62n) ... allowing eachlboth bifilar coil assembly (56/62a xxx 56/62n -
SSS56/ 62a xxx SS56/62n) to be electrically and magnetically energized in the same progressive
direction toward Water Gap (Cp) and away from blocking diode (55) of Figure (3-34) as to Figure
(10-1) and Figure (10-3) '" keeping amp-surge (inhibiting amp flow) to a minimal level [See
Voltage Performance Graph (750) of Figure (7-14)] while enhancing Voltage Potential of
Electrical Stress (64/RU-RU'a xxx 64/ST-ST'n) as additional Dual Choke Coils (56/62 _ SS56/62)
are included in the stacked coil-array forming Voltage Intensifier Circuit (970) of Figure (10-1) as
to (620) of figure (7-1) ... see Dynamic Voltage Waveform (770) of Figure (8-1), once again."

6
above pic if only you want to put more bifilar chokes in series

pages 10-4 and 10-5

"The magnet Coil-Wire (56/62) is best suited for Voltage inducement while the
inductance/capacitance/resistance properties of Stainless Steel coil-wire (SS56-SS62) is
appropriately used to restrict electron movement beyond the self-inductance of each energized
coil when elevated voltage levels (up to beyond 40 kilovolts) are to be reached/obtained without
experiencing any appreciable amount of "Amp Influxing." Generally, magnet coil-wire length is
longer than the Stainless steel coil-wire length and magnet bifilar-coil (56/62) is placed on top of
Stainless Steel bifilar-coil (SS56/62) to maximize mutual inductance coil-field (Rp2) (adding Rp1
+Rp2) of (690) of Figure (7-8) to cause coil capacitance (Cda xxx Cdn) to help maintain and even
increase pulse voltage amplitude (xxx Vn + Vn 1 + Vn2 + Vn .... etc.) while the resistive value
(Rs2) of SS Coil-Wire (SS56/62) performs the work of further resisting the flow of amps not
inhibited by both self-Inductance fields (Rpl + Rp2), as so illustrated in (690) of Figure (7-8). In all
cases, bifilar coils (56/62 - SS56/62) are electromagnetically orientated in the same direction."

7
The above pic I drew shows the bare bones bifilar choke system.
Top is the secondary transformer coil.

Output through blocking diode goes into one of the bifilar choke winds.

In figure 10-3B, it is easy to see that the direction the winds are coming off the core that when the
positive hits that coil, north is at that side.

The potential follows through to the outside positive tube through water to negative inside tube.

Positive potential moves to the other bifilar choke coil (wound the same direction) meaning that
north will be at THAT end (opposite of the north on the other coil) and through this coil and to the
negative on power supply.

Both choke coils on the pos and neg tube create opposing magnetic fields against each other. On
the on pulse, the pos side choke coil is north by the diode side and south by the pos tube side...
the neg side choke coil is north by the tube side and south by the power supply neg. On the OFF
pulse, they both reverse and also oppose each other.

In many diagrams in the tech brief, this exact configuration shows that the choke coils are in
opposition at all times on the off and on pulse.

My picture shows the bare bone system without the electron extraction circuit (EEC) or any coils
being tapped.

8
Meyer says that the I core (rectangle with line down middle) as shown in fig 10-3B is the best
core for the choke since this configuration restricts amps the most.

More to come and comments and observations on the above very welcome...