Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Biopolymer
PREDICT, BUILD, AND VISUALIZE MACROMOLECULAR 3D STRUCTURE
Biopolymer provides the tools needed for building and manipulating peptide, protein, DNA/RNA, and carbohydrate structures.
The adaptable utilities make it possible to create models that compare favorably to those obtained from experimental data.1
Biopolymer is fully integrated with SYBYL® for structure prediction, model construction, structure refinement, and visualization
and analysis. FlexiDock within Biopolymer docks ligands into receptor binding sites, while allowing conformational flexibility
in both the receptor and the ligand.
searched for patterns of residues, secondary Biopolymer and SYBYL together provide
structures, sequences, or Cα distances in accurate energy-based modeling of protein
order to refine structural models. or nucleic acid complexes as well as small
organic substrates. A selection of force
For example, if a protein loop is not resolved fields is available for geometry optimization
by experimental techniques or modeling, and molecular dynamics, whether for large
candidate loop conformations can be
obtained from the database using
Biopolymer’s loop search capabilities.
Random tweak 4 is an alternative method for
building loops that generates random phi
and psi angles for a polypeptide fragment.
The phi and psi angles are modified to satisfy
distance constraints derived from the
A closeup of the loop candidates for the gap at residues structural gap.
526-531.
Analysis tools within the Molecular
Features Spreadsheet allow candidate loops to be
Build complete protein backbone from compared and prioritized on the basis of
Cα trace sequence similarity, geometric fit, torsion
Automatic side chain construction and distance measurements, and steric
interactions with the protein. Interactive
Import and export PDB, PIR, MSF
displays link spreadsheet data, graphs, and The completed protein structure, after addition and
file formats optimization of the four missing loops. The structure is
structural models to facilitate interpretation
color-coded by crystallographic B-factor, with the modeled
Model peptidomimetics and of results. loops shown in red-orange.
other oligomers
Secondary structure prediction methods
Mutate, insert, or delete residues
Full control of monosaccharide linkage
position and branching 133 Loop Suitability
Structure Refinement
Fit_RMS
Biopolymer includes both knowledge-based
and energy-based methods for refining
model structures. The protein database
within Biopolymer is a compilation of the
highest resolution structures from the The best loops are found at the vertex of the graph giving high sequence homology, low RMS fit, and a small number of bad vdW
contacts. Loops can be selected interactively based on spreadsheet data.
Protein Data Bank.3 This database can be
Biopolymer
STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY: MACROMOLECULAR MODELING PREDICT, BUILD, AND VISUALIZE MACROMOLECULAR 3D STRUCTURE
biomolecular assemblies, for small values, and determines the energetics of Amino Acid Sequence
building protein loops identified, SiteID can automatically create Advanced Computation. The quality of the refined structure
is assessed by ProTable and MatchMakerTM. MOLCAD cre-
the files required by FlexXTM (licensed ates surface displays that support SiteID’s location of
potential binding sites within or on the protein’s surface.
Analysis and Visualization separately) to rapidly dock databases Once the binding site has been identified, UNITY queries are
Biopolymer’s specialized analysis and of ligands. readily constructed for searching corporate or vendor data-
bases to uncover potential lead compounds. FlexX and
visualization tools make it easy to access CScore together perform virtual high-throughput screening
the information inherent in macromolecular Features to prioritize these compounds for synthesis or screening.
FUGUETM for recognizing distant 2. Needleman, S.B.; Wunsch, C.D. “A General Method
Applicable To The Search For Similarities In The
homologues by sequence-structure
Amino Acid Sequence Of Two Proteins.”
comparison. J. Mol. Biol. 1970, 48, 443.
GeneFold for identifying protein function 3. Berman, H.M.; Westbrook, J.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland, G.;
from sequence. Bhat, T.N.; Weissig, H.; Shindyalov, I.N.; Bourne, P.E.
“The Protein Data Bank.” Nucleic Acids Res.
LeapFrog® for performing de novo ligand 2000, 28, 235. http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/
design.
4. Fine, R.M.; Wang, H.; Shenkin, P.S.; Yarmush, D.L.;
MatchMaker for building 3D models of Levinthal, C. “Predicting Antibody Hypervariable
proteins from sequence using inverse- Loop Conformations. II: Minimization And Molecular
Dynamics Studies Of MCPC603 From Many
folding techniques.
Randomly Generated Loop Conformations Proteins.”
MOLCAD for visualizing molecular 1986, 1, 342.
surfaces and properties. 5. Clark, M.; Cramer III, R.D.; Van Opdenbosch, N.
“Validation of the General Purpose Tripos 5.2 Force
ORCHESTRAR TM for comparative protein
Field.” J. Comp. Chem. 1989, 10, 982.
modeling.
6. i) Halgren, T. “Merck Molecular Force Field. I. Basis,
ProTable for analyzing and assessing the Form, Scope, Parameterization, and Performance of
quality of protein structures. MMFF94.” J. Comput. Chem. 1996, 17, 720.
ii) Halgren, T. “MMFF VI. MMFF94S Option for
SiteID for finding and visualizing protein Energy Minimization Studies.” J. Comp. Chem.
binding sites. 1999, 20, 720-729.
UNITY® for locating compounds in 7. Cornell, W.D.; Cieplak, P.; Bayly, C.I.; Gould, I.R.;
databases that match a pharmacophore Merz Jr., K.M.; Ferguson, D.M.; Spellmeyer, D.C.;
Xov, T.; Caldwell, J.W.; Kollman, P.A. “A Second
or fit a receptor site
Generation Force Field for the Simulation of
Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules.”
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 5179.
WWW.TRIPOS.COM CONTACT_US@TRIPOS.COM
UNITED STATES
AUSTRALIA CANADA FRANCE GERMANY JAPAN UNITED KINGDOM
800 323 2960
+61 (7) 5439 9775 +1 450 4334500 +33 1 69 59 29 49 +49 89 45 10 300 +81 3 5166 1721 +44 1 908 650000
+1 314 647 1099
©Tripos, Inc. 2005 0075 Printed in USA All trademarks are the property of their respective owners.