Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1 The Appraisal workflow for the Appraisee is provided in the 'WorkFlow' worksheet.
2 The Current Objectives for the Appraisee are listed in the 'Objectives' worksheet
3 The Archived Objectives for the Appraisee are listed in the 'Archived Objectives' worksheet
4 The Competencies for the Appraisee are listed in the 'Competency' worksheet
5 The Comments and Ratings should not include Special Characters
6 The Performance Summary for the Appraisee are listed in the 'Performance Summary' worksheet
7 The Action Plans for the Appraisee are listed in the 'Action PLans' worksheet
8 The OverAll Rating for the Appraisee is listed in the 'OverAll Rating' worksheet
9 The content in 'Red' color font is not to be edited
10 The content in 'Black' color is editable
11 The formatting of the cell is not supported. Updation of the entire data in the file is not possible.
The deletion/insertion of any row/ column in the worksheets are not supported. Under such scenario the sheet data is not
12
updated.
13 The final submission of the appraisal form at every stage is only through http://hrweb.wipro.com
14 The data updation / access through http://hrweb.wipro.com is disabled, if the 'File download' is enabled.
Employee
1 Addition of new Objectives are to be done only through http://hrweb.wipro.com.
2 Addition of 'Additional Supervisor/s' is to be done only through http://hrweb.wipro.com
3 'Role Selection' is to be done through http://hrweb.wipro.com
Needs to provide only Appraisee Comments for 'Significant Achievements', in 'Objectives' worksheet. If any data is provided
4
for any other 'Columns' will not be updated.
5 Needs to provide data for the already existing and/or new objectives.
6 Re-ordering of Objectives results in failure of data updation.
The Competency ratings are 'E / M / N / C '. If anything else is entered the system will update as 'C' - 'Cannot Rate'. Please
7
note that N indicate IR - (Improvement required)
In Discussion stage, the Employee can only view the complete appraisal form. Thus uploading of the appraisal form is not
8
possible.
Additional Supervisor
Needs to provide the Additional Supervisor Comments and ratings for Objectives and Competency and/or Extra Competency
1
of the Employee.
2 The Objectives ratings are 'OS / EE / ME /NI'. If anything else is entered the system will update as 'C' - 'Cannot rate'
The Competency ratings are 'E / M / N / C '. If anything else is entered the system will update as 'C' - 'Cannot Rate'. Please
3
note that N indicate IR(Improvement Required).
4 In Discussion stage the Additional Supervisor can only view the complete appraisal form.
Supervisor
1 Needs to provide the 'Over All Rating' for the Employee in the 'OverAll Rating' worksheet.
Needs to provide the Supervisor Comments and ratings for Objectives and Competency and/or Extra Competency of the
2
Employee.
3 Addition of Extra Competency is only through http://hrweb.wipro.com.
4 Needs to provide the 'Performance Summary' details in Discussion stage.
5 The Objectives ratings are 'OS / EE / ME / NI'. If anything else is entered the system will update as 'C' - 'Cannot rate'
The Competency ratings are 'E / M / N '. If anything else is entered the system will update as 'C' - Cannot Rate. Please note
6
that N indicate IR (Improvement required).
7 The Over All rating is 'OS / EE / ME /NI '. If anything else is entered the system will update as 'C' - 'Cannot rate'
8 It is Mandatory for the Supervisor to provide Ratings for all the Objectives and Competencies only.
HR
1 HR has to do the appraisal online only
Appraisal WorkFlow
Prahladbhai Ganeshbhai
Emp No.: 150453 Emp Name:
Patel
Sup No.: 97778 Sup Name: Jyoti Prakash Das
TM No.: 12572 TM Name: CHRISTOPHER P J
DH No.: 0 DH Name: -
HR No.: 165358 HR Name: Gaurav Chopra
Discussion Sup Discussion Sup
97778 Jyoti Prakash Das
No.: Name:
Prahladbhai Ganeshbhai
Appraisal Status: Pending with Employee Pending With:
Patel
Number Objective Measurement Criteria Appraisee's Comments
Significant Achievements
· Completeness of Deliverables.
Successfully completed all the assigned tasks on time. Highest
· Timeliness of deliverables number of prontos (more than 30 prontos) are reported in AXC C5.5
release by me in AXC SV dusseldorf and ODC team. None of the
· Timely Escalation / Status updates / reports prontos were rejected because of misunderstanding of the
requirement. Reported prontos contain all the necessary information
· Problem solving , Ability to work out solutions to reproduce the problem by the developer. No major and critical
independently bugs slipped in System Verification in the tested domain. All the test
cases executed on time and created report in the Testman ontime.
Updated weekly SV test metric on time without slippage. Sent weekly
. Number of Prontos/ Defect raised. Number of Prontos status report to Michael and Wipro lead without slippage. Understood
Rejected with misunderstanding of the requirement should be the IP Iub requirements in depth and clearly. Where ever required,
less than 5%. discussed the requirements and specification with specification and
Delivery development team and corrected the incorrect, incomplete and
1 improper requirements by raising the requirement change request.
· Contribution to Reviews
Wrote all the test cases for BFD and PM area in C5.5 IP IUB release.
Highest number of test cases (Total 20) wrote in the C5.5 release in
· Thoroughness of test case writing (quality of test case, AXC SV dusseldorf and ODC team. Test cases written with very good
error handling, adherence to test case writing style, quality and no major comments received on the test cases while
performance/re-usability considerations etc). review. Test case development work was highly appreciated by
Michael and Andreas. Participated in the test case reviews for the
· Understanding of requirements Depth, Clarity testcases written by AXC SV team members and provided valuable
and good comments. Worked as first contact person in SV team for
all the BFD related issues. Along with my manual test case
· Completeness of design & Alternatives considered
execution, participated in the test automation in the AXC dusseldorf
and gained good knowledge about the automation frame work.
· Time management, Resource management making Created test plan, test report and test group report for the executed
best use of available time & resources test cases for C5.5 test cycles on schedule. After coming to offfshore,
made the whole test automation setup in the ODC same as
Dusseldorf. Actively participated in the offshoring activities like lab
setup, effort esimation etc fror C5.5, 6.0 and 6.0 EP1 project.
· Quality of deliverables
None of the prontos were rejected because of
· Compliance to the selected process flow for the particular
misunderstanding of the requirement. Reported prontos contain
activity:- VelociQ
all the necessary information to reproduce the problem by the
developer. Michael Herrman appreciated the quality of the
· Quality of Documentation & Code
prontos reported by me. Wrote all the test cases with very good
quality and with detailed information without missing any
· Preparedness and contribution for reviews.
testing scenerios or requirement. No major comments received
on the test cases while review. In some test cases no single
· Timeliness and completeness of review follow-up
3 Quality & Process comment received from the reviewer. Test case development
work was highly appreciated by Andreas. Generated report for
· Process Awareness and Compliance.
all the executed test cases with all the required information.
Particiaption in Test automation activities and resolving
· Completing Ecube Related Activities
Interwatch issues were highly appreciated by
Michael.Participated in the test case reviews for the testcases
- Closing work-plans in a timely manner
written by AXC SV team members and provided valuable and
good comments. Sent weekly status report to Michael and
- Updating review records
Wipro lead without slippage.