Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Operational Requirements
Abstract
Radio beacons used by maritime, aviation and land users in distress are mandatory safety devices
as per regulations by ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organisation) and IMO (International
Maritime Organisation). The radio beacons are operated on 3 frequencies namely 121.5 MHz, 243
MHz and 406 MHz, specifically allocated for Search and Rescue (SAR) purposes. The
international Cospas-Sarsat system detects, processes and locates these signals, and distributes to
the concerned Rescue Co-ordination Centre (RCC) for initiating SAR action. These beacons are
designed to operate automatically in a distress situation. India is a member of Cospas-Sarsat
programme and provides space and ground system support to process and distributes distress
messages picked-up from these beacons to users globally. The Indian system has been operational
since 1989 and providing SAR services to users in India and its neighborhood.
This paper provides radio beacon characteristics, international specifications and regulations, and
various developments that are taking place at national and international level. It also provides
necessary guidelines to Indian users particularly from aviation sector so as to have national and
international compliance for safe travel and timely SAR support.
1. Introduction
With increasing numbers of private and commercial aircraft, the importance of having effective
search and rescue (SAR) is paramount. Often when a small aircraft crashes, a search is conducted
to locate the crash site. In a vast country like India, with huge land and coastal area, the problem
of locating a distressed site is especially challenging.
In the mid 1970s, the use of Emergency Locator Transmitter (ELT) units became mandatory for all
aviation aircraft in North America. Originally the ELT was designed to be a low power (100 mW)
radio transmitter which emits an amplitude modulated signal of carrier frequency 121.5 MHz and
optionally 243 MHz. Upon impact the ELT unit is activated automatically, or it can be switched
on manually, providing homing signal to rescue forces. However, mountainous regions or dense
forests can block or reflect the homing signal, making it difficult for the rescue plane to receive the
transmission. Hence these line of sight restrictions can cause lengthy delays in locating the
aircraft. As the old generation 121.5/243 MHz beacons were not designed to be used by a
satellite-based system, a new generation of beacons transmitting at 406 MHz, to be used
exclusively for satellite detection, was introduced at the beginning of the Cospas-Sarsat project in
1979. The performance of these beacons was found to be far superior to 121.5 MHz beacons.
It was proposed that satellites in 850 km polar orbits be equipped to receive the ELT
transmissions. The advantage offered by a satellite, compared with a rescue plane, is its extended
field of view since each satellite pass covers thousands of square kilometers. Hence the Search
And Rescue Satellite Aided Tracking (SARSAT) system was initiated.
The United States, Canada, and France developed the SARSAT system while Russia (then Soviet
Union) conceived an equivalent system called COSPAS. The overall programme is known as
COSPAS-SARSAT and has been in operation since 1983. Ships carry an Emergency Position
Indicating Radio Beacon (EPIRB) which basically performs the same function as the ELT.
When the ELT is activated, it transmits a signal, which is received by an orbiting satellite, as it
sweeps out a path over SAR region of interest. Due to the relative motion between the satellite
and the ELT unit, the signal received at the spacecraft is Doppler shifted. A repeater onboard the
satellite relays the signal to a Local User Terminal (LUT) on the ground, which processes the
received signal and estimates the location of the ELT by analyzing the Doppler shift information,
which is embedded in the signal.
The zero Doppler frequency shift occurs at the inflection point of the Doppler curve, and is the
point of closest approach of the satellite to the accident site. Consequently, this frequency must be
determined with as much accuracy as possible since the slope of the Doppler curve at this point is
used to calculate the range from the satellite to the transmitting source. With the range and the
known position of the satellite, the location of the emergency signal source can be estimated. This
estimate is passed to the Rescue Coordination Centre (RCC) for initiating necessary SAR action.
Fig 1 gives a basic concept of the Cospas-Sarsat system.
ISTRAC operates 2 LEOLUTs (Low Earth Orbiting Local User Terminals), one each at Bangalore
and Lucknow, 1 GEOLUT (Geostationary Earth Orbiting Local User Terminal), at Bangalore, and
a Mission Control Centre situated in ISTRAC campus at Bangalore. ISRO also provides SAR
payload on INSAT series of satellites (INSAT-2A/2B, currently INSAT-3A, future INSAT-3D) as
a part of GEOSAR space segment.
2
2. The International Co-operative Programme
This satellite system was initially developed under a Memorandum of Understanding among
Agencies of the former USSR, USA, Canada and France, signed in 1979. Following the
successful completion of the demonstration and evaluation phase started in September 1982, a
second Memorandum of Understanding was signed on 5 October 1984 by the Centre National
d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES) of France, the Department of National Defence (DND) of Canada, the
Ministry of Merchant Marine (MORFLOT) of the former USSR and the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) of the USA. The System was then declared operational in
1985. On 1 July 1988, the four States providing the space segment signed the International
Cospas-Sarsat Programme Agreement, which ensures the continuity of the System and its
availability to all States on a non-discriminatory basis. In January 1992, the government of Russia
assumed responsibility for the obligations of the former Soviet Union. A number of States, Non-
Parties to the Agreement, have also associated themselves with the Programme and participate in
the operation and the management of the System.
3. Distress Beacons
The use of satellites to detect and locate special-purpose radiobeacons, either manually activated
or automatically activated by an aircraft crash or maritime distress situation, reduces the time
required to alert the appropriate SAR authorities and to provide location and/or identification of
the distressed object. The International Maritime Organization (IMO) and the International Civil
Aviation Organization (ICAO) recommend that ships and aircraft carry Emergency Position
Indicating Radio Beacon (EPIRBs) and Emergency Locator Transmitters (ELTs) respectively.
It is estimated that there are about 650,000 121.5 MHz beacons in use world-wide. The Table -1
provides a list of typical 121.5 MHz signal characteristics. Most of these beacons are used aboard
aircraft and they are required to meet specifications set by ICAO.
ICAO standards were not established with the aim of satellite reception of 121.5 MHz signals.
Therefore 121.5 MHz Cospas-Sarsat System was designed to serve the existing type of beacons,
even though system performance would be constrained by the beacons' characteristics. Parameters
such as system capacity and location accuracy would be limited. No information is usually
provided about the operator's identity. Despite the limitations indicated above, the efficiency of
121.5 MHz beacons has been greatly enhanced by the use of satellite detection and Doppler
location techniques. A block schematic of 121.5 MHz beacon is given in Fig 2.
121.5 MHz beacons carried aboard aircraft can usually be activated both manually and
automatically by shock (using a crash sensor or G-switch).
The 121.5 MHz and 243 MHz beacons were not designed to be used by a satellite based system.
The match- merge process is particularly difficult for 121.5/243 MHz transmissions. The signals,
which may originate from sources other than legitimate distress beacons, are distinguishable only
by the spectrum of the source and by the location and other parameters calculated by the LUT
from its Doppler shift. The spectrum consists of a 121.5 MHz carrier of a nominal 100 mW,
pulsed modulated at a rate that sweeps from about 1600 Hz to 300 Hz, repeated 2-4 times per
second. This modulation provides a rich sideband profile, to which is added transmitter, satellite
and LUT noise, carrier instability and interference from other sources. In addition, some beacons
3
are phase incoherent with the modulation, adding to the spectrum complexity. As a result, the
individual spectra are very random in character, and determining a single central frequency is a
challenging task.
Each solution received by the MCC consists of estimates of latitude, longitude, frequency bias (i.e.
offset from the carrier frequency, without Doppler shift) and possibly other parameters
characterizing the signal, such as bias drift and sweep period. Several LUTs may independently
report solutions for overlapping parts of the same pass over the beacon; the MCC must not only
match up these solutions from different LUTs, but also match them with solutions from the same
sources on previous passes. The match-merge solutions produced by an MCC are primarily based
upon the location and center frequency calculated by the LUTs. Solutions attached to the
sidebands are presumed to have the same, or close, locations and frequency bias estimates as other
solutions for the source on the same pass; solutions from different passes are also presumed to
have the same, or close, locations and frequency biases.
Usually ELT units have carrier frequencies distributed over a range of ± 3 kHz. When combined
with the range of Doppler shifts of ± 3 kHz, most of the ELT signals received at the satellite fall
over within the range of approximately 12 kHz. For processing purposes, the total range of
frequencies is extended to a bandwidth of 15 kHz.
There are many problems need to be solved for processing 121.5 MHz (243 MHz) signals since
the spectral properties of ELT/EPIRB signals vary considerably. The signals generate not only
carrier peaks but also sideband peaks, which produce in-band interferers. In the real environment,
there are numerous other interferers, which add to the already crowded spectrum.
2 - 4 Hz
AUDIO SECTION ANTENNA
SWEEP MULTI-
OSC.
VIBRATOR 1600 - 500Hz
RF SECTION 30-50%
MODULATOR
121.5 PWR.AMP
&
243 MHz
AMPLIFIER
OSC
Frequency
SPECTRUM
As far as accuracy of location estimates is concerned, there are two problems which affect the
performance of these ELT units, the instability of the carrier frequency oscillator, and an
unfortunate interaction between the modulation and the carrier frequency oscillator which causes
frequency pulling. Consequently, the accuracy of location estimates is limited to a radius of 20 km
4
TABLE-1
Typical 121.5 MHz Beacon Characteristics
Parameter Value
RF Signal
Transmitted power 50 - 100 mW PERP*
Battery Life 48 Hours
Frequency 121.5 MHz ± 6 kHz
Frequency Tolerance ±50 PPM
Polarization Linear
Modulation
Sweep Rate 2 - 4 Hz
Range 300 - 1600 Hz ( swept at least 700 Hz)
Modulation Type AM
Modulation depth > 85 %
Duty Cycle 40%
'*' Peak Effective Radiated Power relative to a 1/4 wavelength monopole mounted on a ground plane
Frequencies in the 406.0 - 406.1 MHz band have been exclusively reserved for distress beacons
operating with satellite systems. The Cospas-Sarsat 406 MHz beacons have been specifically
designed for use with the LEOSAR system to provide improved performance in comparison with
the older 121.5 MHz beacons. They are more sophisticated than the 121.5 MHz beacons because
of specific requirements on the stability of the transmitted frequency, and the inclusion of a digital
message, which allows the transmission of encoded data such as a unique beacon identification. A
block schematic of 406 MHz beacon is given in Fig.3.
A second-generation 406 MHz beacons have been introduced since 1997, which allow for the
transmission in the 406 MHz message of encoded position data acquired by the beacon from
Global satellite navigation systems, using external or internal navigation receivers. This feature is
of particular interest for GEOSAR alerts, which otherwise would not be able to provide any
position information. The 406 MHz beacons have following merits over the 121.5 MHz beacons:
System performance is greatly enhanced both by the improved frequency stability of the 406 MHz
units and by operation at a dedicated frequency.
The basic characteristics of 406 MHz beacons are given in Table 2. These beacons transmit a
5 Watt RF burst of approximately 0.5 seconds duration every 50 seconds. The carrier frequency is
very stable and the pulse is phase-modulated with a digital message as shown in Table 2.
Frequency stability assures accurate location, while the high peak power increases the probability
of detection. The low duty cycle provides a multiple-access capability of more than 90 beacons
simultaneously operating in view of a polar orbiting satellite and low mean power consumption.
5
An important feature of 406 MHz emergency beacons is the addition of a digitally encoded
message, which provides such information as the country of origin and the identification of the
vessel or aircraft in distress, and optionally, position data derived from internal or external
navigation receivers.
An auxiliary transmitter (homing transmitter) can be included in the 406 MHz beacon to enable
suitably equipped SAR forces to home on the distress beacon. Most EPIRBs and ELTs include a
121.5 MHz homing transmitter in accordance with the requirements of IMO and ICAO. However,
the performance characteristics of the homing transmitter are not covered by the Cospas-Sarsat
system specification.
Performance of the 406 MHz system depends on actual transmission characteristics of the
beacons. Consequently, Cospas-Sarsat has developed a type approval procedure for 406 MHz
beacons, which is defined in document C/S T.007. National administrations should authorise only
type approved 406 MHz beacons for use with the Cospas-Sarsat System. The list of manufacturers
and type approved beacon models is given in the document Cospas-Sarsat System Data, which is
published periodically by the Cospas-Sarsat Secretariat and also available on Cospas-Sarsat
Website. Cospas-Sarsat Website address is: http://www.cospas-sarsat.org.
The structure of the message burst transmitted by the 406 MHz beacon consists of three distinct
fields: an unmodulated preamble (for carrier synchronization), a bit/frame sync, and a message
field. The bit rate is 400 bits per second. The data is encoded using Biphase-L Manchester phase
modulation with a peak modulation of 1.1±0.1 radians. The bit size may exhibit variation of upto
1%.
The unmodulated preamble lasts for 160 ms, followed by 60 ms sync sequence, and then follows
message bits. In a standard message, the 88 message bits divided into fields, which identify the
user and (optionally) give location information. The total standard format burst lasts 440 ms (112
bits) while the total long format burst lasts 520 ms (144 bits).
Of the standard message bits, 61 are known and fixed at the time of beacon manufacture. The 61
bits in the protected data field, as illustrated in fig.4, consists of a user identity code. These bits are
subject to error correction by 21 error correction bits (BCH error correcting code). There are
additional 6 bits, which can be used to transmit either an emergency code or other data.
The bit synchronization field consists of 15 data "1" bits, while the frame synchronization
comprises the bit pattern 000101111. The Fast Fourier Transformation (FFT) provides an effective
means of detecting and recognising the presence of one or more ELT signals over the 25 kHz
frequency band.
121.5 MHz beacons are available at a very low cost, but this outdated technology which cannot be
improved easily, is the source of a very large number of false alerts (over 98% of all 121.5 MHz
Cospas-Sarsat alerts). This situation impacts on the efficiency of SAR operations and increases
6
the workload of Rescue Co-ordination Centres. As a result of the 121.5 MHz system limitations,
and because of the availability of the newer 406 MHz beacons with better performance, it has lead
to a request by the IMO and CAO Joint Working Group on SAR for a termination of the satellite
processing of 121.5 MHz signals from 2008.
406.025 MHz
Cospas-Sarsat 406 MHz beacons can be used in different environments and for a variety of
applications such as EPIRBs (maritime), ELTs (aviation) or PLBs (personal use). The
specification of the distress signal characteristics (document C/S T.001), which ensures that all
406 MHz beacons are compatible with the Cospas-Sarsat Space Segment, is applicable to all types
of beacons. However, different user groups have different needs, hence the need for various
coding protocols. General 406 MHz beacon-coding formats are presented in Fig 4. To satisfy
these requirements, the Cospas-Sarsat specification provides for various coding options, which are
divided in 2 groups of coding protocols: User Protocols and Location Protocols,
The user protocols can be used for encoding the beacon identification and other data in the digital
message transmitted by a 406 MHz distress beacon, but do not allow for encoding beacon position
data.
The location protocols can be used for encoding beacon position data, in addition to the beacon
identification data, in the digital message transmitted by a 406 MHz distress beacon. Protocols in
both groups (i.e. user protocols and location protocols) can be implemented using either the short
message format or the long message format as given in Fig. 4 (A & B).
The choice of the protocol option to be used in a particular beacon type depends on:
a) the user category (maritime, aviation, or personal);
b) the method used to provide beacon identification data as required by the responsible
administration; and
c) the required resolution of encoded position data (only for location protocols).
7
5.2 Coding User Protocols
This section defines the user protocol message formats which can be used to encode the beacon
identification data and other data in the message transmitted by a 406 MHz distress beacon.
The national user protocol and the test user protocol can be coded either with the short or the long
message format, as indicated by the format flag: “0” (short message), or “1” (long message).
Table 2
Basic Characteristics of Cospas-Sarsat 406 MHz Beacons
Parameter Value
RF Signal:
Carrier frequency 406.025 ±0.005 MHz
Frequency stability:
• Short term ≤ 2 x 10 -9 /100 ms
• Medium term
- Mean slope ≤ 1 x 10 -9 /minute
- Residual freq. variation ≤ 3 x 10 -9
Power output 5 W ±2 dB
Data encoding Bi-phase L
Modulation Phase modulation of ±(1.1) radians peak
Failure mode Continuous transmission of carrier
not to exceed 45 s
Digital Message:
Repetition Period 50 s ±5%
Transmission Time 440 ms (short message)
520 ms (long message)
CW Preamble 160 ms
Digital Message
• short message 112 bits (280 ms)
• long message 144 bits (360 ms)
Bit Rate 400 bps
Operating Temperature Range:
• Class 1 - 40oC to + 55oC
• Class 2 - 20oC to + 55oC
Thermal shock 30oC temperature difference
Operating Life Time: at least 24 hours at minimum temperature
Message Structure:
8
Fig.4A: Data fields for the short message format
BCH error-
Frame correcting code
synchronization
Non-Protected
Bit Frame
Synchronization Synchronization First Protected Data Field (PDF-1) BCH-1 Data Field
9
Figure 5: Bit Assignment for the First Protected Data Field (PDF-1) of User Protocols
7. ORBITOGRAPHY PROTOCOL
Bits 25 26 27 36 37 39 40 85
...... F 1 Country Code 0 0 0 Orbitography Data (46 bits)
Radio call sign of six or fewer alphanumeric characters can be encoded in Maritime User Protocol.
Radio call sign of up to seven characters (four alphanumeric and three digits) can be encoded in Radio Call
Sign User Protocol.
10
5.3 Coding Location Protocols
This section defines the protocols which can be used for encoding beacon position data, as well as the
beacon identification data, in the digital message transmitted by a 406 MHz distress beacon.
Five types of location protocols are defined for use either with the long message format or with the
short message format, as illustrated in Fig 6. The five protocol types available are:
• User-location Protocol;
• Standard Location Protocol;
• Standard-Short Location Protocol;
• National Location Protocol; and
• National-Short Location Protocol.
U s e r - L o c a t i o n P r o t o c o l s
bit bits bits 40-83 bits bits 86-106 bit 107 bits 108-132 bits
26 27-39 84-85 133-144
Identification Data Radio- 21-Bit Position. Position Data 12-Bit
1 ....... (44 bits) locating BCH code Data to 4 min Resolution BCH code
Device Source (25 bits)
S t a n d a r d L o c a t i o n P r o t o c o l s
bit bits bits 41-64 bits 65-85 bits 86-106 bits 107-112 bits 113-132 bits
26 27-40 133-144
Identification Data Position Data 21-Bit Supplementary Position Data 12-Bit
0 ....... (24 bits) to 15 min Resolution BCH code Data to 4 sec Resolution BCH code
(21 bits) (20 bits)
S t a n d a r d - S h o r t L o c a t i o n P r o t o c o l s
N a t i o n a l L o c a t i o n P r o t o c o l
bit bits bits 41-58 bits 59-85 bits 86-106 bits 107-112 bits 113-126 bits bits
26 27-40 127-132 133-144
Identification Data Position Data 21-Bit Supplementary Position Data National 12-Bit
0 ....... (18 bits) to 2 min Resolution BCH code Data to 4 sec Resolution Use BCH code
(27 bits) (14 bits)
N a t i o n a l - S h o r t L o c a t i o n P r o t o c o l
6. Beacon Registration
One of the advantages of 406 MHz beacons is that each beacon is designed to transmit a unique
message allowing its identification. However, to take advantage of this feature, a register is needed to
relate each beacon to a particular ship, aircraft or individual user. Beacon registration is valuable for the
resolution of SAR cases. Identification of the beacon user (ship, aircraft or individual user) helps SAR
services to properly respond to a distress alert provided that the registration database contains the
11
information listed below in Table-3. This information provides important search planning data to
allow the timely rescue of people in distress. Registration information also helps to resolve false alerts
without diverting SAR resources.
All 406 MHz beacons (EPIRBs, ELTs or PLBs) should, therefore, be registered. Every administration
requiring or allowing the use of 406 MHz beacons should make suitable arrangements for the
registration of 406 MHz beacons, and enforce their registration.
The IMO and the ICAO require that administrations authorising the use of 406 MHz beacons make
provisions for registering these beacons in a database register that is accessible by SAR services 24
hours a day.
As the administration authorising the use of the beacon, is not always maintaining the beacon
registration database but could, alternatively, use the service of another administration, the country
code in the 406 MHz beacon message (bits 27 - 36) must provide a link to the administration
maintaining the beacon registration database. The country code should always enable SAR services to
retrieve pertinent registration data through the point of contact associated with that country code.
Administrations should provide the means for beacon owners to readily and expeditiously update
information in the registration database. Owners of beacons are responsible for reporting any change
in the registered information, including de-registration of the beacon in the case of a change of
ownership. Administrations should also regularly verify the accuracy of the database information by
contacting the beacon owners. A census of registered 406 MHz beacons should be undertaken by
administrations at least every two years. Administrations should also require a check of the beacon
registration during mandatory periodic inspections of the beacon. Authorities maintaining or using
databases should ensure that information supplied for beacon registration is treated as proprietary, and
ensure that it is used only by appropriate recognised authorities.
Administrations maintaining registration databases should provide the means for SAR services to
obtain relevant information on a 24 hours, seven days a week basis.
It is desirable that the appropriate information from Tables-3 be recorded in beacon registration
databases or in other appropriate registers and be made available to SAR services in case of distress
alerts. Examples of beacon registration cards are provided in document “Handbook of Regulations on
406 MHz and 121.5 MHz Beacons”, which is annually updated by the Cospas-Sarsat Secretariat.
12
Table-3: Example of Basic Information to Be Recorded and
Made Available through Beacon Registration
Full length (22/30 Hex) Full length (22/30 Hex) message Full length (22/30 Hex) message
message with default position with default position bits with default position bits
bits
Name of owner/ Aircraft registration number/ Name of vessel/
organization name of aircraft operator call sign/MMSI
Name, address and phone Name, address and phone Name, address and phone
number of emergency number of emergency number of emergency
contact person contact person contact person
Notes: (*) Beacon Identification (Beacon 15 Hex ID) - the 15 hexadecimal characters that
uniquely identify each 406 MHz beacon. This Beacon Identification is derived from
bits 26 to 85 of the 406 MHz beacon message. For location protocols, the position
data in the first protected data field (PDF-1) is set to specified default values to obtain
the unique Beacon 15 Hex ID.
The issuing of performance requirements, carriage regulations and the testing and type approving of
406 MHz distress beacons are the responsibilities of national authorities. However, to ensure beacon
compatibility with Cospas-Sarsat Space Segment and Ground Segment equipment, it is essential that
beacons meet specified Cospas-Sarsat performance requirements. Compliance with these requirements
13
provides assurance that the tested beacon performance is compatible with, and will not degrade, the
Cospas-Sarsat System.
The Cospas-Sarsat type approval tests are designed to ensure that the signals transmitted by the
beacons and their coding meet all applicable requirements of the Cospas-Sarsat specification for 406
MHz distress beacons (document C/S T.001). These tests primarily measure the electrical
characteristics of beacon transmissions on 406 MHz and, with the exception of temperature, do not
take into account environmental conditions the beacon may encounter during normal use.
In order to ensure that beacons do not degrade the System and to ensure uniformity of testing, Cospas-
Sarsat has defined the necessary tests and overall procedure which a manufacturer must follow to
receive Cospas-Sarsat type approval (document C/S T.007 “Cospas-Sarsat 406 MHz Distress Beacon
Type Approval Standard”). The tests described in C/S T.007 consist of a series of indoor laboratory
tests in which the beacon does not transmit to the satellite, and an outdoor functional test of the beacon
transmitting to the satellite.
The beacon manufacturers should submit for Cospas-Sarsat type approval testing beacons coded
with a test protocol of appropriate type and format (user-short or long, user-location, standard
location-short or long, national location-short or long). All protocol types intended for use with the
beacon should be verified. The verification of the different coding options within each type is not
required. However, sample messages should be provided for each applicable coding protocol as
required by C/S T.007.
After successful completion of Cospas-Sarsat type approval testing, the test report and other technical
documentation (as specified in C/S T.007) is submitted to the Secretariat. A Cospas-Sarsat type
approval certificate will be issued to the beacon manufacturer by the Cospas-Sarsat Secretariat, after
review and approval of the test results by Cospas-Sarsat.
Should it be demonstrated subsequently that the production models do not meet the same standard as
the type approved model, Cospas-Sarsat reserves the right to revoke the certificate.
406 MHz beacons that have received Cospas-Sarsat type approval are listed in the Cospas-Sarsat
System Data which is published periodically by the Secretariat.
National administrations should also consider requirements, which may contribute to reducing false
alerts such as:
visual/audio indicators;
2-step activation mechanism; and
including a description of testing procedures in the beacon user manual.
14
Depending on the intended use of the beacon, administrations should also consider the
recommendations of international organizations (e.g. IMO, ICAO, ITU, etc.). Administrations are
urged to harmonise their requirements with those defined by other administrations or international
organizations.
8. Guidelines to Administrations
406 MHz beacon coding protocols have been developed to satisfy maritime (EPIRB), aeronautical
(ELT) and personal (PLB) applications.
Regardless of the application or protocol used, the creation and maintenance of a registration database
is very important. Administrations are responsible for the definition and control of beacon
identifications registered in their national databases. All measures should be undertaken to avoid
possible duplication of beacon identifications.
Using the Cospas-Sarsat type approval certificate number may help ensuring that the serial number
assigned by a manufacturer provides a unique beacon 15 Hex ID, independently of the country of
registration indicated by the country code. When a beacon 15 Hex ID is assigned by the national
administration of the country designated by the country code, bit 43 can be set to “0” and the content of
bits 44 to 83 redefined as required. However, in that case, the national administration must ensure that
the beacon 15 Hex ID is unique.
9. Conclusion
Following user growth and potential application of the Cospas-Sarsat system beacons, several new
developments are expected to be introduced in the beacon technologies and ground processing
system to further enhance and improve the efficiency of the system. Some of these developments
are:
• In view of the termination of 121.5 MHz beacons and to make 406 MHz beacons more
affordable, newer technologies are being investigated to lower the cost of the beacons and will
be shortly available to user. Recognising the need for lower cost beacons, the Cospas-Sarsat
Council in its 33rd meeting (CSC-33) in October 2004, approved the change of the beacon
medium-term frequency stability for temperature stressed conditions to be 2 *10 E9 per minute
from the original requirement of 1 * 10 E9 per minute. For non-temperature stressed
conditions, the 1 X 10 E 9 requirement remains valid. ISRO is already in advance stage of
developing such beacons.
• Frequency spectrum of 406 MHz beacon is spread over a wider band to accommodate expected
growth of the 406 MHz beacons.
• International beacon registration database is being developed to handle false alarm issues more
efficiently.
• Ship Security Alarm System (SSAS) is being implemented for security of the maritime users.
For this, a separate beacon protocol and data distribution procedure has been approved by the
Cospas-Sarsat for implementation by all ground systems.
• Development of MEOSAR (Medium Earth Orbiting Search and Rescue) system for real-time
alerting using single burst of the beacon signal, with redundancy of satellites and availability
and possibility of having return link to beacon.
15