Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

FPIN’s Clinical Inquiries

Sunscreen Use for Skin Cancer Prevention


PATRICIA BOUKNIGHT, MD, and ANDREW BOWLING, MD†, Spartanburg Family Medicine Residency Program,
Spartanburg, South Carolina
FRAN E. KOVACH, MLIS, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois

Clinical Inquiries provides Clinical Question confidence interval [CI], 0.46 to 0.81; num-
answers to questions
submitted by practicing Does sunscreen use prevent skin cancer? ber needed to treat = 140).1 Each group
family physicians to the included persons of all skin types, with more
Family Physicians Inquiries Evidence-Based Answer than 50 percent of persons in each group
Network (FPIN). Members
of the network select
Daily sunscreen use reduces the incidence having fair skin and 20 percent reporting
questions based on their of squamous cell carcinoma but not the that they “always burn.” An intention-to-
relevance to family medi- incidence of basal cell carcinoma. (Strength treat analysis of 1,383 participants eight
cine. Answers are drawn of Recommendation [SOR]: B, based on a years after completion of the initial random-
from an approved set of
evidence-based resources
single randomized controlled trial with less ized controlled trial demonstrated a pro-
and undergo peer review. than 13 years of follow-up). It is unclear longed protective effect, with a 35 percent
The strength of recom- whether there are longer-term effects. There lower incidence of squamous cell carcinoma
mendations and the level is no consistent, conclusive evidence that in the daily sunscreen groups (RR = 0.65;
of evidence for individual
studies are rated using sunscreen use prevents melanoma. (SOR: C, 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.98; number needed to treat
criteria developed by the meta-analysis of case-control studies). = 2.8).2
Evidence-Based Medicine
Working Group (http:// Evidence Summary BASAL CELL CARCINOMA
www.cebm.net/?o=1025).
SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA In the Nambour study, the incidence of
The complete database In a randomized controlled trial, 1,621 par- basal cell carcinoma in the daily sunscreen
of evidence-based ques-
tions and answers is
ticipants in Nambour, Australia, were ran- groups compared with the no daily sunscreen
copyrighted by FPIN. If domized to one of four treatment groups. groups was not statistically significant after
interested in submit- Of the two groups assigned to daily sun- 4.5 years (153 tumors in 65 persons versus
ting questions or writing screen use, one group (n = 404) applied sun 146 tumors in 63 persons; RR = 1.05; 95%
answers for this series,
go to http://www.fpin. protection factor (SPF) 15 sunscreen to the CI, 0.82 to 1.34).1 In the eight-year follow-up
org or e-mail: questions@ head, neck, arms, and hands, and received study, there was no statistically significant
fpin.org. daily oral beta carotene supplementation. decrease in the incidence of basal cell carci-
A collection of FPIN’s Clin- The second group (n = 408) was assigned to noma (RR = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.49 to 1.14).2 In
ical Inquiries published in sunscreen application plus an oral placebo. an additional multifailure survival analysis,
AFP is available at http:// Of the two groups not assigned to daily none of the three analysis models found a
www.aafp.org/afp/fpin.
sunscreen use, one group (n = 416) received significant difference in the risk of subse-
daily oral beta carotene supplementation, quent basal cell carcinoma.3
and the other group (n = 393) received daily
MELANOMA
oral placebo. Participants who were not in
the daily sunscreen groups were allowed A meta-analysis of 11 case-control stud-
discretionary use of sunscreen.1 ies involving 9,067 patients evaluated the
Over 4.5 years, persons in the daily sun- effect of sunscreen use on the incidence of
screen groups had a decreased incidence melanoma.4 Results were heterogeneous and
of squamous cell tumors at the sites of included study data from population-based
sunscreen application compared with and hospital-based sources. The analysis did
those in the no daily sunscreen groups (28 not find an altered rate of melanoma with
tumors in 22 persons versus 46 tumors in sunscreen use (combined RR = 1.11; 95%
25 persons; rate ratio [RR] = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.37 to 3.32). A review of 18 case-control
Downloaded from the American Family Physician Web site at www.aafp.org/afp. Copyright © 2010 American Academy of Family Physicians. For the private, noncommercial use
October 15, 2010 ◆ Volume 82, Number 8
of one individual www.aafp.org/afp
user of the Web site. All other rights reserved. Contact copyrights@aafp.org for copyright questions American Family
and/or permission Physician 989
requests.
Clinical Inquiries

studies examining sunscreen use in patients


REFERENCES
with melanoma found no significant associa-
tion between melanoma and sunscreen use 1. Green A, Williams G, Neale R, et al. Daily sunscreen
application and betacarotene supplementation in pre-
after controlling for skin sensitivity.5 vention of basal-cell and squamous-cell carcinomas
of the skin: a randomised controlled trial [published
Recommendations from Others correction appears in Lancet. 1999;354(9183):1038].
Lancet. 1999;354(9180):723-729.
The American Academy of Dermatology rec-
2. van der Pols JC, Williams GM, Pandeya N, Logan V,
ommends year-round application of broad- Green AC. Prolonged prevention of squamous cell
spectrum sunscreen with SPF 30 or higher carcinoma of the skin by regular sunscreen use. Cancer
Epidemiol Biomarker Prev. 2006;15(12):2546-2548.
to all areas of the body exposed to the sun.6
3. Pandeya N, Purdie DM, Green A, Williams G. Repeated
†—Deceased. occurrence of basal cell carcinoma of the skin and
multifailure survival analysis: follow-up data from the
EDITOR’S NOTE: Dr.
Bowling graduated from the University Nambour Skin Cancer Prevention Trial. Am J Epidemiol.
of South Carolina School of Medicine in Columbia, and 2005;161(8):748-754.
completed his residency at the Spartanburg (S.C.) Family 4. Huncharek M, Kupelnick B. Use of topical sunscreens
Medicine Residency Program. Dr. Bowling passed away in and the risk of malignant melanoma: a meta-analysis of
February 2010. He was in private practice in the Spartan- 9067 patients from 11 case-control studies. Am J Public
burg community at the time of his death. Health. 2002;92(7):1173-1177.
Copyright Family Physicians Inquiries Network. Used with 5. Dennis LK, Beane Freeman LE, VanBeek MJ. Sunscreen
permission. use and the risk for melanoma: a quantitative review.
Ann Intern Med. 2003;139(12):966-978.
Address correspondence to Patricia Bouknight, MD, at 6. American Academy of Dermatology. Facts about sun-
pbouknight@srhs.com. Reprints are not available from screens. Schaumburg, Ill.: American Academy of Der-
the authors. matology. http://www.aad.org/media/background/
factsheets/fact_sunscreen.htm. Accessed September 9,
Author disclosure: Nothing to disclose. 2010. ■

990 American Family Physician www.aafp.org/afp Volume 82, Number 8 ◆ October 15, 2010

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen