Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Romanticism Paper
The poem “France: An Ode”, written by Samuel Coleridge and Robespierre’s Republic of
Virtue agree on the values that the French Revolution fights for but have contrasting
views on the methods used to achieve those goals. The French Revolution fought to break
down the monarchial system and replace it with egalitarian government. Both Coleridge
and Robespierre agreed that a new form of government was necessary. They differ,
though, on Robespierre’s idea that terror is virtue and the destruction caused by the
French Revolution. As a Romantic poet, Coleridge focuses on the common person and
Coleridge agrees with the original intent of the French Revolution which fights
for the common person. He feels that liberty is something that all humans should have
regardless of their social class or lineage. Coleridge compares liberty to “the solemn
music of the wind.” Comparing freedom to “solemn music” he shows that ones liberty is
a serious matter that if addressed correctly would enhance the enjoyment of life, like
music. By associating freedom with wind, Coleridge implies that freedom is universal
because wind travels everywhere. These ideas tie in with the Romantic views that all
people should have the right to strive for happiness. These views are again illustrated
when Coleridge writes, “Thou rising Sun! thou blue rejoicing Sky.” (Coleridge, 102) By
comparing “liberty” to the sun and the sky, Coleridge states that the idea of liberty is a
natural right. It is not something that should have to be fought for, but something that all
people should inherently possess. By also comparing “liberty” to the rising sun implies
that the rise of a democratic government is on the horizon and that when it is uncovered it
will be a very good thing for the whole world. Romantic poetry often referred to the
natural aspects of the world as Romantic poetry strived to bring together nature and man.
Coleridge illustrates that he is optimistic about where the French Revolution could lead
states that his goal is “the peaceful enjoyment of liberty and equality; the reign of that
eternal justice whose laws are engraved not on marble or stone but in the hearts of all
men.” (Perry, 114) Robespierre meant that he wanted to create a state where people do
not have to fight for there liberties. The metaphor in this passage “laws are engraved not
on marble or stone but in the hearts of all men” shows Robespierre’s belief in unbendable
laws that apply to everyone. By saying that laws are engraved he means that these laws
must stick with his citizens at all times and “in the hearts of all men” confirm his belief in
natural laws that all are born with. Robespierre only wants people who are willing to give
for the greater good. Robespierre also says, “We wish, in a word, to fulfill the intentions
of nature and the destiny of humanity, realize the promises of philosophy, and acquit
providence of the long reign of crime and tyranny.” (Perry,114) In this passage,
Robespierre claims that the intention of nature is for humankind to use the ideas of
philosophy, reason and logic, and remove the monarchial constraints that have been
placed upon them. Robespierre argues that humans have the right to govern themselves
those are the only formats that allow for universal happiness. Like many leaders before
him who ultimately failed, Robespierre, in the traditional Enlightenment theory, sought to
Coleridge supported the idea of the Revolution, but as the Revolution turned
violent he began to criticize the Jacobins for the approach they took to achieve their
goals. Coleridge shows this when he says, “Forgive me, Freedom! O forgive those
dreams! I hear thy voice, I hear thy loud lament.” (Coleridge, 103) Coleridge states in this
passage that he feels humbled by believing that the French Revolution could actually
change anything. By saying that he “hears thy loud lament” he shows his emotions of
sadness that Robespierre could bring freedom and that he still feels he has a duty to bring
freedom to all people. Coleridge disapproves of the disregard for human life, “I hear thy
groans upon her blood-stained streams.” (Coleridge, 103) Coleridge, in this passage,
illustrates the level of violence in France by saying that Robespierre killed so many
people that blood replaced the water in the streams. The imagery used depicts more
violence than anyone could imagine. With this new regime, the Reign of Terror,
Coleridge feels that the French created a mockery of what liberty actually is. “O France,
that mockest Heaven, adulterous, blind, And patriot only in pernicious toils!” (Coleridge,
104) This passage shows that the Revolution did not unify France like it should. The
citizens only act patriotic towards their country when acting in a violent manner.
Robespierre sought to create a utopia, but the revolution destroyed the values of freedom
and equal liberty that heaven, a utopia, is based on. Rather than help the common people,
Robespierre became power-hungry and turned into what they originally fought, “Are
these thy boasts, Champion of human kind? To mix with Kings in the low lust of sway.”
(Coleridge, 104) Robespierre, believing they knew the best way to reform France took
too much power and attempted to mold France to their liking, but destroying the freedom
By using reason, Robespierre came to believe that terror could help to achieve the
goals of the Revolution in the quickest manner possible. Robespierre knew that a
government promoting the liberty and freedom of the common person was morally
correct, not a monarchy. Robespierre called the Revolution a “war of liberty against
tyranny.” Referring to the Revolution as a war alludes to the destructive nature that the
Since virtue (good citizenship) and equality are the soul of the republic, and your
aim is to found and to consolidate the republic, it follows that the first rule of your
equality and to the development of virtue; for the first care of the legislator must
This passage shows how Robespierre attempts to take complete control of France. He
says that citizens must give up rights, not gain rights, to help the government, which
Robespierre controls completely. Logically this made sense as he believed that the
government attempted to create was the best and therefore he needed to have all the
power to do so. To him using terror to enforce his laws, which to him were absolutely
necessary, seemed perfectly reasonable as it would only affect his enemies, not his
followers.
terror is destructive; terror, without which virtue is impotent. Terror is only justice
115)
Robespierre in this passage explains how his destructive actions logically make sense.
According to him terror emanates virtue as terror acts as a mean to enforce virtue,
therefore someone already virtuous will not be affected. Logically this made sense, but
realistically his actions tore apart France as the destruction he caused overwhelmed any
good that his Reign of Terror brought. Robespierre consistently shows a willingness to
fight his own country believing that to stop a civil war he would have to kill everyone
against him, even though these sorts of actions started the civil war.
How can civil war be ended? By punishing traitors and conspirators, particularly
leaders to subdue the aristocrats of Lyon, Marseille, Toulon, the Vendée, the Jura,
and all other regions in which the standards of rebellion and royalism have been
raised: and by making frightful examples of all scoundrels who have outrage
Robespierre used logic and reason constantly to work towards his goal of creating a
utopia, but he overlooked the consequences that France would face if he followed
through.
The contrast between these two artifacts illustrates the debate between the
reacted against that theory, believing the world to be more than just reason and logic. The
Romantic outlook focuses more on life and enjoying where you are since you might not
be there again, while the Enlightenment concentrates on working towards a goal. The
Romantic thinkers criticized the French Revolution and Robespierre for that. Robespierre
became to focused on perfecting society that he did not take notice to the destruction that
he caused.
Works Cited