Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Contents
1
Lignocellulose as feedstock
• Low-cost feedstock (~50-60 € / ton d.w.; 3-4 € /GJ) e.g straw, wood
residues, energy crops,..
• Alternative source of sugars (to replace starch, sugar agro feedstocks)
• High availability / Limited competition with food production
• High CO2 reduction for 2-G biofuels and biobased products
>10 Mt >10 Mt
>1 Mt & <3 Mt >5 Mt & <10 Mt
Production of pulp for paper in EU27+ (2006) Agricultural residues of food and feed crops (data for 2000) in
Source: FAO Statistics EU27+, Source: Refuel,2007
2
Lignocellulosic biomass
Complex raw material due to complex structure of the plant cell wall: intermeshed
carbohydrate and lignin polymers.
Hemicellulose:
branched co-polymer
of C5 (Xyl, Ara) and Lignin:
C6 sugars (Glc, Man, random co-
Gal) polymer of
fenyl
propane
units:
Large variety in composition and structure esp. matrix or
hemicellulose and lignin fractions ‘glue
Polymers have differential reactivity to thermal,
chemical and bioprocessing
3
Potential products Lignocellulose Biorefinery
4
Product lines in the IP BIOSYNERGY
Multi-product biorefinery, Focus on residues cellulose ethanol i.e. C5 and lignin valorisation
Ethanol
Cellulose Enzymatic C6 sugars
Fermentation ABE
Hydrolysis
Ligno-
Xylonic acid
cellulosic
biomass Physical
Esp. chemical Hemicellulose (HMF) > 2,5 FDA
STRAW pretreatment
Chemical Furfural
&
C5 sugars Conversion
Fractionation Pentoside
Surfactants
Lignin SC Chemical Phenolics
Depolymeri- conversion
sation Enzymatic Activated
conversion lignins
Resins /
Catalytic Fractionation Thermosets
Pyrolysis
Goals:
● Controlled fractionation of lignocellulose
into fractions with sufficient quality for
production of (bio)chemicals
● enhance access cellulose for enzymatic
hydrolysis to sugar monomers in high
yield /low enzyme use
Mosier N, Wyman C, Dale B, Elander R, Lee YY,
●Minimize by-product formation and the Holtzapple M, Ladisch MR, 2004. Features of
promising technologies for pretreatment of
use of chemicals, water, energy and costs lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresource Technology,
Volume 96, Issue 6, April 2005, Pages 673-686
5
Physical-chemical pretreatment & fractionation
Source: Kevin A. Gray Ph. D. , 2007. Conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into liquid transportation fuels Diversa
Corporation/Celunol, San Diego, CA , USA. http://www.epobio.net/workshop0705/presentations/KevinGray.pdf
6
Enzymatic hemicellulose hydrolysis
7
WP1: Advanced physical/chemical fractionation
• Model feedstocks: straw, woods
Processes studied
• Mechanical/Alkaline fractionation (A&F)*
• Ethanol/water Organosolv (ECN)*
• Organic acid organosolv (Avidell process; ARD)
• Acid hydrolysis (Biorefinery.de)
• Reference technology: steam explosion (ABNT)
• Enzymatic cellulose hydrolysis
Ethanol/H2O Organosolv, ECN Mech./alk pretreatment A& Acid organosolv Pilot plant ARD
Partners: A&F, ABNT, ARD, Bioref, ECN, TUD
100%
90% 92%
80%
yield of hydrolysis
70%
60% 60%
57%
50% 48%
40%
30%
hours
8
WP2: Innovative thermo-chemical conversion
Topics
• Staged (catalytic) thermochemical
processing of biomass and lignin (ECN,
Aston)
Hemicellulose:
amorphous polymer of
xylose (C5-sugar), C6
sugars and a variety of
side-chains
Cellulose: polymer of
glucose (C6-sugar) with
both crystalline and
amorphous regions
9
Staged thermochemical processing
600 °C
Opportunities lign
in charcoal
se 500 °C
ulo
cell
• Sequential thermal decomposition icell
ulo
s e 400 °C
Anhydrosugars,
Phenols
methanol
he m
hemicellulose > cellulose > lignin 300 °C
Acids, furans
HMF
200 °C
• Condensable products: C2-C4, acids, 100 °C Extractives
Cellulose
Challenges Drying
Hemicellulose
Lignin
Base/platform chemicals
10
Yield (wt% d.b.)
Yield (wt% d.b.)
10 10
8 8 8
6 6 6
4 4 4
2 2 2
0 0 0
id
l
ol
l
id
ol
l
F
ols
id
id
ol
n
id
l
ol
l
e
ols
id
ra
de
s
no
an
ra
e
no
ra
M
ol
yd
sa
ac
ac
M
t
yd
t
n
ac
ac
ac
t
ac
rfu
ce
os
ce
rfu
hy
rfu
ce
ha
en
os
H
ha
en
ha
en
H
eh
co
eh
ic
ic
ic
A
ic
A
uc
ic
t ic
Fu
A
e
Fu
Ph
uc
et
Fu
et
Ph
Ph
et
ld
t
rm
ld
glu
rm
ald
rm
ce
ce
M
ce
M
gl
gl
ta
ta
Fo
vo
Fo
A
Fo
vo
et
A
vo
A
e
ce
ac
ac
Le
Le
Le
ya
xy
xy
x
ro
ro
ro
yd
yd
yd
H
10
Yield (wt% d.b.)
10
8 8
6 6
4 4
2 2
0 0
ol
id
ol
l
id
ol
l
F
ols
id
id
ol
n
e
an
ra
ra
M
ol
yd
sa
M
yd
n
ac
ac
t
n
ac
ac
rfu
ce
rfu
ce
os
ha
en
H
ha
en
eh
co
eh
ic
ic
ic
ic
A
Fu
Fu
c
Ph
et
Ph
et
ld
glu
t
rm
ald
lu
rm
t
ce
ce
M
M
ta
og
Fo
vo
Fo
et
A
A
e
v
ac
ac
Le
Le
xy
y
ox
ro
r
yd
yd
H
Hybrid thermochemical
One-step BFB pyrolysis Staged (de)gasification processing
Selected chemicals from wheat straw via 1-step BFB pyrolysis, via staged degasification in
an auger reactor and via hybrid thermochemical processing involving aquathermolysis and
BFB pyrolysis showing the superior performance of the hybrid concept
P.J. de Wild et al, “ Biomass valorisation by a hybrid thermochemical fractionation approach”; submitted to International
Journal of Chemical reactor Engineering, 2009
10
Separation/upgrading thermochemical produced bio-oils
Lignin valorization
guaiacyl-unit
Technologies
• Combustion for heat and/or power
• Gasification for syngas
• Hydroliquefaction for transportation fuels (reformulated gasoline)
• Direct application ‘organosolv’ lignins
• Pyrolysis for production of chemicals (monomeric phenols) and/or
performance products
Successful valorisation of lignin is a key-issue for
an economically viable lignocellulosic biorefinery.
11
Potential applications of lignin-derived phenolics
’Green’ plastics Wood-adhesives and resins • Fuel additives (aromatic
ethers)
• BTX
• Binders
• epoxies
• polyolefins
Monomeric phenols
Oligomeric phenols
Condensation
Char
•For a maximal conversion of lignin into (monomeric) phenols there is a narrow window of
pyrolysis conditions such as temperature, heating rate, vapour and solid residence time.
•First of all a proper feeding procedure is required to overcome lignin’s thermoplastic behaviour
that causes severe operational problems such as screw feeder clogging by molten lignin,
agglomeration and subsequent defluidisation of the reactor bed.
•Use of catalyst to improve product selectivity and yield
12
Improving feeding behaviour: construction
of a water-cooled screw feeder
Nitrogen
Vent
Bubbling
fluidised bed Cyclone
reactor
Freeboard
Screw operated
feed bunker
Cyclone ash
collection bin
Heater
Argon fluidisation gas
Coolant
ESP
Bubbling fluidised
Pyrolysis product
bed pyrolysis test rig obtention test rig
Pump
13
Improving thermal processing by application of a catalyst
Bubbling fluidised bed fast pyrolysis Catalytic pyrolysis
of herbaceous lignin at 400°C - 500°C Non-catalytic pyrolysis
5
Product yield in wt% dry feedstock
0
Methanol Guaiacols Syringols Phenols Catechols
20
Phenols
20 - 25 water
13 - 20 organic
Catechols
condensables 15
• 30 - 35 solid (char)
Guaiacols
• The liquid product has been
collected in two fractions, a thick,
10
homogeneous oily liquid with an Syringols
aromatic smell and an aqueous
fraction with a pungent smell
GC-detected,
5 unidentified
phenols
Oligomeric
unknown
phenols
0
Deciduous biomass Herbaceous biomass
derived lignin derived lignin
14
WP3: Advanced biochemical conversion
Objectives
Development of advanced biochemical processes for
conversion of sugars and lignin into value-added products
• Acetone-butanol-ethanol (ABE)
fermentation: IFP-A&F
• Xylose conversion to xylonic acid VTT
• Production and analysis of functional lignin
derivates: VTT
• Separation of product mixtures by
Multiphase Rotating disk Contactors: GIG
15
Planned scale-up ABE fermentation (ARD/IFP)
Membranes purification
30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48
ThL treated lignin Time/min
50
Control lignin
Liquid
Raw lignin / Column:
4 6 8 10 12 14 µHydrogel 2000 + 250 + 120 Å
unsolubilised / Time/min
(VTT)
untreated lignin
30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50
Time/min
Mattinen et al. (2008). "Polymerization of different lignins by laccase," BioRes. 3(2), 549-565.
16
WP4: Production & characterisation platform chemicals
Partners: DOW, A&F, ARD, Bioref, GIG, Chimar, TUD
HO
O
O
HO O O
O FD C A HO
HMFu HO
OH
BH M F
17
Applications testing and market validation
18
Planned scale up pentoses valorisation in surfactants ARD
19
WP6: Biomass-to-products chain design, analysis and
optimisation
Objectives
Identification of the most promising biorefinery chains for
the European Union, in terms of:
Performance as yield and efficiency,
Energy efficiency,
Environmental performance as LCA,
Cost as capital, operating and product costs
Socio-economic aspects
Focus on ethanol based biorefineries
steam
straw fractionation C6 stream fermentation ethanol
explosion
heat &
lignin residue
power
phenolic
fast fraction for
fractionation
pyrolysis resin
substituion
20
Summary/Conclusions
Summary/Conclusions
21
Acknowledgements
The BIOSYNERGY project is supported by the European Communities through the Sixth
Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development (2002–2006) with a grant up
to 7.0 million € under contract number 038994 – (SES6). It started on the 1st of January 2007 and
has a duration of 48 months.
Participants IP BIOSYNERGY
Alessandro Agostini Richard Gosselink Gianluca Marcotullio
Bert Annevelink Gareth Griffiths Frederic Martel
Ricardo Arjona Antolin Pablo Gutierrez Maija-Liisa Mattinen
Eleftheria Athanassiadou Elma Gyftopoulou Frederic Monot
Philippe Aubry Henk Hagen Electra Papadopoulou
Caroline Aymard Paulien Harmsen Miguel Pérez Pascual
Rob Bakker Jacco van Haveren Merja Penttila
Cecile Barrere-Tricca Regina Heddes Wolter Prins
David Baxter Eline Heijnen Jacinta van der Putten
Bert van de Beld Yvon le Henaff René van Ree
Rolf Blaauw Bwee Houweling-Tan Hans Reith
Carmen Boeriu Wouter Huijgen Anna Rogut
Anthony Bresin Wiebren de Jong Jan Rogut
Tony Bridgwater Gerfried Jungmeier Petra Schönicke
Reyes Capote Campos Sjaak Kaandorp Philippe Schild
José Caraballo Birgit Kamm Agnes Maria Stepan
Marianna Charisi Richard op den Kamp Jan Stoutjesdijk
Katie Chong Boyan Kavalov Muzaffar Syed
Myrsini Christou Kees van Kekem Tarja Tamminen
Ioannis Eleftheriadis Evert Leijenhorst Wouter Teunissen
Maria Fe Elia Miguel Marcel van der Linden Arnoud Togtema
Daan van Es Raimo van der Linden Herman den Uil
Boris Estrine Angelika Lingitz Marian Wiatowski
Silvia Ferratini Ana María Lopez Contreras Marilyn Wiebe
Antzela Fivga Michael Lukas Paul de Wild
Maria Georgiadou Michael Mandl Emma Wylde
22
Thank you for your attention!
More information:
www.biosynergy.eu
www.biobased.nl/lignovalue
www.biorefinery.nl
www.biorefinery-euroview.eu
www.biorefinery.nl/biopol
23
Integrated Thermal Biorefinery 500 MWth
composition yield annual yield
Compound
[vol%] [kg/tonne] [ktonne] Major products/chemicals:
CO
H2
34.2
20.9
364
16
309
13
• Syngas (H2/CO)
CO2 26.1 438 372 • Methane
CH4 11.6 71 60 • Ethylene
N2 0.52 5.6 4.7
ethylene (C2H4) 3.87 41 35 • BTX
acetylene (C2H2) 0.39 3.8 3.2 • Tar compounds (e.g. naphthalene)
ethane (C2H6) 0.26 3.0 2.5
benzene 0.97 29 24
toluene 0.14 4.8 4.1 The biorefinery scale and the
xylenes 0.09 3.6 3.0 amount of chemicals produced
NH3 0.47 3.0 2.5
tars (sum) 0.35 17 14 match with typical chemical
- heavy tars ~ 6.4 5.4 manufacturing processes currently in
- light tars ~ 10 8.9
- phenol ~ 1.8 1.54
operation.
- indene ~ 1.5 1.24
- naphthalene ~ 2.7 2.27
- antracene ~ 0.5 0.46
TOTAL 100 1000 850 •Yield per tonne dry ash-free wood
furfural
acetic acid
~
~
30
65
25
55
•8000 operational hours
formic acid ~ 40 34 •With preceding Torrefaction plant
References
Kevin A. Gray Ph. D. , 2007. Conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into liquid transportation fuels
Diversa Corporation/Celunol, San Diego, CA , USA.
http://www.epobio.net/workshop0705/presentations/KevinGray.pdf
2nd EPOBIO Workshop: Products from Plants – from crops and forests to zero-waste biorefineries
15-17 May 2007, Athens, Greece. http://www.epobio.net/workshop0705.htm
Ralph P. Overend, 2007. The lignocellulosic bottleneck:material properties, architecture and
pretreatment. 2nd EPOBIO Workshop: Products from Plants – from crops and forests to zero-
waste biorefineries 15-17 May 2007, Athens, Greece.
http://www.epobio.net/workshop0705/presentations/RalphOverend.pdf
Kamm, B., 2007. Biobased products from lignocellulose sources.. 4th Conference of the Forest-based
Sector Technology Platform,15-16 May 2007, Hannover, Germany.
www.forestplatform.de/download.php?id=155
Bridgwater, A.V., 2005. Fast pyrolysis based biorefineries. ACS, Washington, 31 August 2005.
V. Steinmetz and J.H. Reith, 2009. Mapping of EU biorefinery activities. Workshop BioRefuture 2009,
30 March 2009, Brussels. http://www.biorefinery.nl/biopol/workshop-biorefuture-2009/
http://www.ecs.umass.edu/biofuels/Images/Roadmap2-08.pdf
24