Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Bob Marley
Professor Queen
English 101
04 October 2008
individual and the accountability of the actions that take place in the story. The creator, Victor
Frankenstein, is a respected individual who strives to go beyond the human possibilities and
generates the creature whom he inevitably regrets making. The Creature is brought into this
world as a newborn, who knows nothing of its inhabitants and how to live, but eventually causes
destruction that tears apart a once joyful family. The choices that the characters make define
themselves and also those around them. Because of these choices, the lives of others and oneself
may eternally be altered for better or for worse. This story explores the concept of responsibility
Shelley writes this novel in the multiple first-person point of view, which effectively
allows the readers to view the perspective of the Creature and to sympathize with him. Two of
the heinous deeds that the Creature commits are the killings of Elizabeth, Victor’s wife at the
moment of her death, and William, Victor’s youngest brother. In these cases, one could say that
the Creature himself is solely responsible for their deaths. However, there is a possibility that the
terrible events that have happened to the Creature in turn spur his crimes. The Creature, time
after time, strives to be accepted and loved by those he encounters. At the beginning of the
story, the Creature starts out as a kind, peaceful being as a “grin wrinkle[s] his cheeks” (Shelley
Marley 2
86; vol. 1, ch. 4) much like a newborn baby, when he first greets Victor on the morning of his
creation. Initially, he does not intend to harm Victor and even decides to leave him because the
Creature knew that Victor felt remorse and disgust during the brief periods when they encounter
each other. Although he is most referred to as the “monster”, the Creature has strong human
emotions and experiences feelings just like any other individual would. The creature stumbles
upon the worst emotions and pains such as fear, cold, sadness, and anger during his first weeks
of solitude as well as in the short moments the people in the community encounter him. On the
second morning of his birth, he starts living in a nearby forest where he discovers basic human
needs such as hunger, thirst, and warmth and struggles to overcome all these difficulties. When
he first steps foot into a small village, the villagers “attack [him]… and [he] fearfully [takes]
refuge in a low hovel” (Shelley 132; vol. 2, ch. 3) Since that incident, the Creature has been too
terrified to interact with humans in fear that he will be abused again. Because of his lonely
isolation from the rest of humanity, he harnesses only these emotions and begins to hate himself
as well as the cause of his creation. On the other hand, if the creature was surrounded by human
society and treated with the same respect as any other person, there would be little to no cause
for his crimes. The Creature shows inconsistent behaviours of hatred, through the murder of
Victor’s friends and family members, as well as fear, such as his concealment in the hovel. The
reasons for inconsistent behaviours are explained in the book, Psychology: The Science of
Behaviour, by Neil R. Carlson et al. These reasons are characteristics of motivation, which
“affect[s] the nature…strength…and persistence of the behaviour” (Carlson et al. 405; ch.13) and
is evident when the Creature struggles to find a lifelong companion as a reason for living. One of
the Creature’s motivation in life occurred when he develops strong affections for the De Lacey
Marley 3
family, whom lives poorly in a cabin, and attempts to befriend the blind old man of the family
but is hurtfully chased away by the other occupants. The negligence from the De Lacey family
devastates the Creature’s perseverance of social bonding and changes his behaviour drastically,
thus altering the Creatures motivation. The Creature was not given the choice on his looks and as
a result, his feelings of sadness and hatred are the cause for his dismay in life as well as in the
Victor Frankenstein leads an ambitious life wanting to discover and create the impossible
in addition to doing things that no man has done before. But by doing so, Victor creates an
individual that lives with his consequences and faces a life of disappointment and sadness. Even
though Victor had carefully selected the Creature’s features, the overall vision of his life’s work
crumbles when the Creature comes to life. Instead of living with this mistake of his, Victor runs
away from the reality that is the monster and chooses to pretend that the Creature was never born
while attempting to live his old life again. Regardless, the truth quickly catches up to Victor and
he knowingly “conceive[s] a violent antipathy” (Shelley 95; vol. 1, ch. 5) towards anything that
involves the Creature, including his earlier years of studies. Because of Victor’s obvious
avoidance from his own creation, the Creature takes his pain and directs it to the happiness that
was Victor’s life. An example of the Creature’s vengeance is the surprising murder of Victor’s
childhood friend, Henry Clerval, which utterly devastates Victor and enlarges the hate that
Victor holds for the Creature. These acts of revenge from the Creature cause Victor to become
wild and vengeful and as a result, a game of pain is created between the creator and his Creature
until the death of one another becomes the only solution. Sylvia Bowerbank’s journal, The Social
Order vs. the Wretch: Mary Shelley’s Contradictory-Mindedness in Frankenstein, explores the
Marley 4
relationship between the Creature and Victor. Bowerbank notes that the Creature’s need for a
companion became too strong that the death of Elizabeth “ensures that Victor will be his
companion in misery until death.” (Bowerbank 428) By killing the most important person to
Victor, the Creature realises that his creator will forever hunt him down and this hunt forms a
game of revenge for the Creature that bonds the two individuals. Victor could have been a major
connection to the Creature’s humanity but he does not take responsibility for his actions and
causes the Creature to rely on others who only judges his outward appearance but not his
character and personality. Victor, as the creator, should look after the Creature like a mother
would nurture her own newborn as suggested by the academic journal, Frankenstein and the
Miltonic Creation of Evil, by David Soyka. Victor is given an opportunity by the Creature to
repair the hostility between them, but his “lack of foresight… [and] his male egocentrism, fails to
anticipate the evil he lets loose” (Soyka 173). Victor’s failure to properly educate the Creature
causes “evil” to develop and grow within the Creature each time he is faced with rejection. No
one else knows the origin of the Creature except for Victor, who even after given a second
chance to mend the peace between them, decides to push away the Creature until Victor’s grief
The Creature had no choice in his creation and could not convince people to like him for
his true initial nature. The creature’s outward appearance is the only reason that transforms his
innocent nature into hate and unhappiness. Victor Frankenstein, in short, created the ghastly form
of the Creature that leads to both of their demises and misfortunes because Victor could not
uphold his duties, as the creator, to either help the Creature live the life he created, or end the
Creature’s misfortunes through death. No matter how much the Creature tries to change himself,
Marley 5
he is still treated the same way. Nothing he did matters because of his grotesque appearance,
which was chosen by Victor. Overall, Victor’s actions and denial of his creations existence
changed his future for the worst since he could not live up to his responsibilities and chose to
ignore them. In the end, Victor ends up with the same hardships as the Creature because his
consequences, which built up over many years, at last caught up to him and demonstrated to him
Works Cited
Bowerbank, Sylvia. “The Social Order vs. the Wretch: Mary Shelley’s Contradictory
Carlson, Neil R, et al. Psychology: The Science of Behaviour. 4th ed. Toronto: Pearson, 2010.
405. Print
Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft. Frankenstein; or, the Modern Prometheus. 1818 Ed. D.L.
Macdonald and Kathleen Scherf. 2nd ed. Peterborough: Broadview, 1999 Print.
Soyka, David. “Frankenstein and the Miltonic Creation of Evil.” Extrapolation 33.2 (1992):