0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
79 Ansichten17 Seiten
Presentation to the Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning, York College/CUNY 03/31/2011. Focuses on current trends and philosophies in ePortfolio and Open Education.
Presentation to the Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning, York College/CUNY 03/31/2011. Focuses on current trends and philosophies in ePortfolio and Open Education.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Verfügbare Formate
Als PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
Presentation to the Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning, York College/CUNY 03/31/2011. Focuses on current trends and philosophies in ePortfolio and Open Education.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Verfügbare Formate
Als PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
An e-portfolio is a digitized collection of artifacts including demonstrations,
resources, and accomplishments that represent an individual, group, or institution.
E-portfolios encourage personal reflection and often involve the exchange of ideas and feedback.
Types - E-portfolios for showcase.
Types - E-portfolios for assessment.
Types – E-portfolios for learning.
According to a 2008 study by the Campus Computing Project, across all higher education sectors, the use of e-portfolios has tripled since 2003.
The Four Major Drivers of E-Portfolio Use – a growing interest in student- centered active learning, the dynamism of digital communication technologies, spurred by the pressure for increased accountability in higher education, and responds to increasing fluidity in employment and education.
J. Elizabeth Clark and Bret Eynon
E-portfolios at 2.0—Surveying the Field
peer Review – Emerging Trends and Key Debates in Undergraduate EducationVol. 11, No. 1 | Winter 2009
http://www.aacu.org/peerreview/pr-wi09/pr-wi09_index.cfm
What's driving eportfolio - interest in student-centered active learning
Photo from Games, Learning and Society 6.0 Conference in Madison, Wisconsin
students would study the design and function of their digital environments, share their findings, and develop the tools for even richer and more effective metacognition, all within a medium that provides the most flexible and extensible environment for creativity and expression that human beings have ever built.
Gardner Campbell
A Personal Cyberinfrastructure
EDUCAUSE Review Magazine, Volume 44, Number 5, September/October 2009
http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Review/ EDUCAUSEReviewMagazineVolume44/APersonalCyberinfrastructure/178431
What's driving eportfolio - forces of dynamic digital communication
Web 2.0 is an attitude not a technology. It s about enabling and encouraging participation through open applications and services. By open I mean technically open with appropriate APIs but also, more importantly, socially open, with rights granted to use the content in new and exciting contexts.
Ian Davis, 2005
Talis, Web 2.0 and All That | Internet Alchemy
http://blog.iandavis.com/2005/07/04/talis-web-2-0-and-all-that
What's driving eportfolio – increasing fluidity in employment and education.
If the old model is broken, what will work in its place? The answer is: Nothing will work, but everything might. Now is the time for experiments, lots and lots of experiments...
Clay Shirky, 2009
Newspapers and Thinking the Unthinkable
http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2009/03/newspapers-and-thinking-the- unthinkable
What's driving eportfolio - pressures for increased accountability in higher education.
In the future it will be more widely recognized that the learning comes not from the design of learning content but in how it is used. Learning and living, it could be said, will eventually merge. The challenge will not be in how to learn, but in how to use learning to create something more, to communicate.
Stephen Downes, 2005
E-learning 2.0
eLearn: Feature Article
http://www.elearnmag.org/subpage.cfm?section=articles&article=29-1
Distinction
Excellent e-portfolios align evidence with context and with audience, and there is a match between the content of the evidence and the way it is framed in the reflective narrative of the e-portfolio.
Kathleen Blake Yancey
Electronic Portfolios a Decade into the Twenty-first Century:What We Know, What We Need to Know
peer Review – Emerging Trends and Key Debates in Undergraduate EducationVol. 11, No. 1 | Winter 2009
http://www.aacu.org/peerreview/pr-wi09/pr-wi09_index.cfm
The process of reading online, engaging a community, and reflecting it online is a process of bringing life into learning. As Richardson comments, "This [the blogging process] just seems to me to be closer to the way we learn outside of school, and I don t see those things happening anywhere in traditional education."
Stephen Downes
Educational Blogging
EDUCAUSE Review, vol. 39, no. 5 (September/October 2004): 14–26.
http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Review/ EDUCAUSEReviewMagazineVolume39/EducationalBlogging/157920
Distinction
From the students perspective the ability to personalize their e-portfolio contributes to their motivation to work on it throughout the year as well as their engagement in the process (Ring, Weaver, and Jones 2008). In other words, when the e-portfolio is designed by the student as much as by the institution, implementation efforts are more likely to succeed.
Kathleen Blake Yancey
Electronic Portfolios a Decade into the Twenty-first Century:What We Know, What We Need to Know
peer Review – Emerging Trends and Key Debates in Undergraduate EducationVol. 11, No. 1 | Winter 2009
http://www.aacu.org/peerreview/pr-wi09/pr-wi09_index.cfm
They would install scripts with one-click installers such as SimpleScripts. They would play with wikis and blogs; they would tinker and begin to assemble a platform to support their publishing, their archiving, their importing and exporting, their internal and external information connections. They would become, in myriad small but important ways, system administrators for their own digital lives. In short, students would build a personal cyberinfrastructure, one they would continue to modify and extend throughout their college career — and beyond.
Distiction
Such metrics that speak to those that use eportfolio vs. those that do not – include higher rates of student engagement on a local measure of engagement (Kirkpatrick et al 2009) as well as on the nationally normed Community College Survey of Student Engagement; higher rates of course completion; and higher rates of retention (Eynon 2009).
Kathleen Blake Yancey
Electronic Portfolios a Decade into the Twenty-first Century:What We Know, What We Need to Know
peer Review – Emerging Trends and Key Debates in Undergraduate EducationVol. 11, No. 1 | Winter 2009
http://www.aacu.org/peerreview/pr-wi09/pr-wi09_index.cfm
Discordance – Assessment vs. Student Learning
...the field has to some significant degree been divided between those who see e-portfolios as tools for enriched student learning and those who focus on their utility as a vehicle for assessment. In a 2007 Inside Higher Ed article, Trent Batson lamented the ways that e-portfolio s potential for enhancing students metacognitive skills had been hijacked by the need for accountability.
J. Elizabeth Clark and Bret Eynon
E-portfolios at 2.0—Surveying the Field
peer Review – Emerging Trends and Key Debates in Undergraduate EducationVol. 11, No. 1 | Winter 2009
http://www.aacu.org/peerreview/pr-wi09/pr-wi09_index.cfm
Discordance – Private vs. Public
Even as numerous studies and commonsense experience point to social interaction in online courses as a key success factor, we find far too many faculty eliminating opportunities for conversation by asking students to turn in work privately.
Patrick R. Lowenthal and David Thomas
Death to the Digital Dropbox: Rethinking Student Privacy and Public Performance
EDUCAUSE Quarterly Magazine, Volume 33, Number 3, 2010
http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Quarterly/ EDUCAUSEQuarterlyMagazineVolum/DeathtotheDigitalDropboxRethin/ 213672
When students are assigned to post information to public social media platforms outside of the university LMS, they should be informed that their material may be viewed by others.
John Orlando, 2011
FERPA and Social Media | Faculty Focus
http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/teaching-with-technology-articles/ ferpa-and-social-media/?c=FF&t=F110207-FF
Discordance – “Creepy Treehouse”
“…efforts to build educational spaces within popular social-networking platforms risk undesirable interactions between personal and professional lives.”
Matthew K. Gold
Beyond Friending: BuddyPress and the Social, Networked, Open-Source Classroom
Learning Through Digital Media Experiments in Technology and Pedagogyas part of MobilityShifts: an International Future of Learning Summit http://learningthroughdigitalmedia.net/beyond-friending-buddypress-and- the-social-networked-open-source-classroom
Any institutionally-created, operated, or controlled environment in which participants are lured in either by mimicking pre-existing open or naturally formed environments, or by force, through a system of punishments or rewards.A situation in which an authority figure or an institutional power forces those below him/her into social or quasi-social situations.
Jared Stein 2008
Flexknowlogy - Jared Stein's ARCHIVED blog - update to jaredstein.org » Defining "Creepy Treehouse”
http://flexknowlogy.learningfield.org/2008/04/09/defining-creepy-tree-
Final Thoughts–
Many students simply want to know what their professors want and how to give that to them. But if what the professor truly wants is for students to discover and craft their own desires and dreams...To get there, students must be effective architects, narrators, curators, and inhabitants of their own digital lives.
Gardner Campbell
A Personal Cyberinfrastructure (EDUCAUSE Review) | EDUCAUSE
http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Review/ EDUCAUSEReviewMagazineVolume44/APersonalCyberinfrastructure/178431
the ease of the . . . portfolio template, for him, made the portfolio creation process feel more list-like and that it removed a good deal of the freedom he associated with creativity. He also reported a loss of multiple contexts in the templated approach.Josh noted, as well, that for him the value of e-portfolios was creating connections from classes to larger contexts.A space for learning to occur in three areas: (1) curricular situations, which are largely course- based; (2) cocurricular situations,which are often linked to the curriculum (e.g., service learning opportunities, internships, peer tutoring, and leadership experiences); and (3) extracurricular situations (e.g., jobs, sports