Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
would be useless to him, for they seem picturesque was real to the artist who painted him. The
only because they resemble some hackneyed practice of painting unreal saints set a fashion of
pictorial type. If he would represent the saint picture-making in European art which has spread
preaching,he must do so from his own memory of to all subjects and prevails to this day. A nude
a preacherwho has moved him, not from a model is just as unreal as Titian's S. John, if
whose pose is sure to be meaningless because the it is painted from a model and expresses no
model himself means nothing by it. In fact, emotional experience of the artist,so is a landscape,
religious art, like all art, should be based upon and so is a genre picture. The naturalism of
knowledge which is not crammed for a particular Bastien Lepage is as futile as the idealism of Guido
purpose, but is ready and clear in the artist'smind Reni, for both attempt to represent what has no
because it is the result of his own emotional emotional significance for the artist. We cannot
experience. That is the kind of knowledge which say whether our Chinese picture is naturalistic or
has made our Chinese saint so real without any idealistic. We only know that it expresses in
realism. His sanctity reveals itself not in proper- visible form, without irrelevanceand with extreme
ties or actions, but in being. He needs no precision, the artist'sidea of a saint; and therefore
scenery to convince us of his reality, because he it is a great work of art.
200
Notes on Italian Medals
above; it is a plaquette, with S. George and the from it are therefore cup-shaped, or scyphate, as
dragon. Other bindings in the same collection numismatists say; and supposing the stamp itself
have copies of the same plaquette, signed by one to have been made from a medal, that medalwould
Giuliano de' Apollini, a goldsmith who is known also necessarily have been scyphate. But as that
to have worked at Ferrarafrom 1476 to 1494. shape is all but unexampled in medals of the
In the British Museum is a fine MS. Gospels period," it is most probable that this particular
(Burney 18) bound in velvet, into which have been stamp, with its convex or bombe face, was
let two late sixteenth-centuryplaquettesof bronze(?) not simply made from an ordinary medal, but
gilt, representingthe A dorationof theShepherdsand expressly designed for the purpose of stamping
the Adoration of the Magi. The plaquettes appear leather or other material." It will be obvious to
to me to be of Italianate Netherlandish work, but anyone who makes experimentsthat a stamp with
so far I have not been able to identify them. They such a surface is more practical than one with a
may be, as Mr. C. F. Bell suggests to me, casts from flat surface, the whole of which has to be driven
repouss6 work, rather than true plaquettes. into the binding to a uniform depth. Such convex
In elaboratemetal bindings, in which for instance stamps were also used for the binding of the 1494
silver replaced leather, it was but natural to use Greek Anthology in the British Museum, which is
medals, or casts of medals, for decorativepurposes. exhibited in the same case with the Bonini ; i here
Of this form of binding I cannot adduce any the types are the heads of Philip of Macedon and
example from Italy. The classical instance 6 is the Alexander the Great (ultimately derived, perhaps
Silver Library of Albrecht, Duke of Prussia, in via Cesati's medal,'"from the head of Athena on
which, about the middle of the sixteenth-century, Alexander'sgold stater).
German goldsmiths inserted in the silver bindings Flat-faced tools, on the other hand, have been
reproductions of medals of the Duke and his wife, used for the binding of a MS.historyof the "Cigni "
of Fl6tner plaquettes, and even of an Italian (Schwanen) family in the British Museum.5" The
plaquette, the sleeping Amor of Fra Antonio da medallionsare unfortunatelymuch worn. That on
Brescia.' the upper board seems to be meant for CharlesV,
Much more interestingthan these inlaid medals whose arms appear in one of the first illuminated
are the impressions on the leather bindings from pages of the book. On the lower board is a head
stamps of medallic character,either made expressly which it is possible to identify, worn as it is, with
for the purpose, or simply moulded on existing the head of Alexanderthe Great as representedon
medals. The best known instance of these " cameo a known Italian plaquette.'6 The plaquette, it is
bindings", as they are called, is probably one in true, is oval,and bearsthe inscriptionALISANDRO
the British Museum, which bearsthe head of Julius in front of the head, a hereas the medallion on the
Coesar impressed on it.8 In this case we are binding is circular and shows no trace of the in-
fortunate in being able to produce [PLATEI, C] an scription; but the diameterof the medallion and
actual binder's stamp corresponding exactly to the the greater diameter of the plaquette are the same
impression in question. It is in the British within a few millimetres,and certain details in the
Museum (Dep. of Coins and Medals),' and beside helmet and the hair leave no doubt that the same
it lie two casts (one in bronze, one in silver) from model was used for the bust in both.
impressions made from it.1o The stamp has no Closely allied to these medallic stamps are those
attachmentat the back, but could doubtless have which representplaquettes,of which the stamps on
had a handle fixed to it with wax for practical Grolier's1497 Celsus in the British Museumare the
purposes. It differs from the ordinary in cavo most famous example.7 These are made from
reproductionsof medals in having its face consider- plaquettes by Giovanni delle Corniole.'8
ably convex instead of flat. Impressions made In almosteverycollection of medalsandplaquettes
8References to which I owe to Geh. Friedensburg and will be found reproductionsin cavo,which we may,
Dr. Menadier.
7 P. Schwenke u. K. Lange,
Die Silber-Bibliothek Herzog n1The obverse of the well-known medal of Sannazaro (" Actius
Albrechts von Preussen (1894). Syncerus ") has this concave form.
11H.P. Horne, The Binding of Books (1894), P1. V and p. 94. "2The convex surface would, of course, not be inconsistent
The book is Bonini's Enchiridion Florence, 1514, with its being a reproduction of an engraved gem in the first in-
and is exhibited in Case XXXII (No. Gramimatices,
5) of the British Museum stance. There are many gems with the same type (head of
exhibition of bookbindings. In Mr.Horne's collection in Florence between lituus and star), but all seem to be oval in shape. Caesar
See
is another impression from the same or a similar stamp on a S. Reinach, Recueil de Pierres
piece of leather, evidently cut from a binding. For much cit. Gravdes,Pl. zog, No. 3, etc.
1~ Horne, op, pp. 93 f.
information on the subject of these "cameo-bindings" I have 1 See Burlington Magazine, Feb., 1911, p. 268,
to thank Mr. A. W. Pollard and Mr. Cyril Davenport ; the 1' Stowe, 657. Mr. Robin Flower kindly called my attention
latter's work on this class of bindings appeared after this to this binding.
article was in type.
'6E.g. Berlin Catalogue of Italian Bronzes, No. 570. Another
*Another is in the Berlin Museum (No. 578, PI. XXXVIII, oval specimen, with the field cut away, is in the Rosenheim
of the Catalogue of Italian Bronzes). Collection.
'0 Such impressions are common ; one is figured in the Berlin 17Horne, p. 91 ; Fletcher, Foreign Bookbindings, Pl. 9; Biblio-
Catalogue of Italian Bronzes, No. 577, on Pl. XXXVIII. Cp. graphica, I (1895), Plates I and II (coloured).
Molinier, Les Plaquettes, p. 28, No. 55. Is Molinier, Nos. 137 (Cocles) and i39 (Curtius).
201
Notes on Italian Medals
for brevity's sake, speak of as matrices. When the popular name for tortoise-shell. I am not aware
medal corresponding was a piece struck from dies whether any such objects exist of so early a date.
(like that of Alfonso d'Este mentioned below), the But that the art of stamping horn, which was
matrix was just like the original die, and could developed for purposes of portraiturein the seven-
indeed be made by casting from such die if it were teenth century,was known as early as the fifteenth
available; otherwise it must have been made by a century is evident from an ink-horn of English
double process of moulding from the medal itself. workmanshipexhibited in the Medieval Room at
However made, such matrices could be used as the BritishMuseum.25
stamps for leather or any other soft substance.
Mr. Whitcombe Greenepossesses a fine specimen II
of a Savonarola medal in this form,"9and in the GIANMARCO CAVALLI AT HALL.
Museo Nazionale at Florence are several other The pretty medal of Maximilian I illustratedon
examples."o These pieces naturally have no PLATEI, B, was acquired for the collection of
reverses; but an exception is to be found in an Messrs.Maxand MauriceRosenheimsome months
example of the French medal issued at Vienne in ago. There was already in the collection a worn
1494 in commemorationof the birthof the Dauphin specimen-since presentedto the BritishMuseum-
Charles-Orland,in which both obverse and reverse but the excellent preservationof the new acquisition,
of the original medal are reproduced in cavo which has suffered little since it left the dies,
back to back.2' made it possible to recognize,what was not obvious
That such matrices as I have described were, before, its resemblance in style to the work of
however, regarded as objects worth perserving, Gian Marco Cavalli. The treatment of the relief
and the arrangement of the bust clearly betray
apart from any practical use to which they might the hand of the artist who made the testoons
be put, is indicatedby an entry in the inventory of
the Este wardrobeof 1494,"where we read : " Una of Maximilian at Hall in 15o6.6 The last
medaglia pichola tonda cum la testa del Duca letter of the inscription on the obverse of this
Francesco in cavo in ottone dorato ".2 medal (MAXIMILIANVS F)
? D'in GRA" REX"
was difficult to explain until,
The same inventory24 contains three entries of searching in the
"medals" which I take the opportunity of British Museum Collection amongst other medals
mentioning here, in the hope of obtaining further of the period, I came across the companion
information on the subject. The materialof which portrait of Maximilian's father, Frederick III,
which is reproduced in PLATE I, D. This is
they were made is called " corno ", or "corno inscribed IMPERATOR P.
rosso ", and they are described as being "stampate FREDRICVS-T-RO"
in cavo ", and mounted in gilt or brass. They Obviously P and F mean Pater and Filius, and as
seem, then, to be impressions made in horn from obviously the two portraitswere made at the same
actual medals. Possibly "corno rosso " may be a time. The portraitof Frederick,since he was dead,
19Similar to ArmandIII, p. 33. Armand regards this medal was doubtless copied from some painting; the
as a work of the i6th century. artist also may have had Bertoldo's medal of 1469
20Thus in the CarrandCollection: No. 581, the oval medal of to help him. The technical details-as seen in the
Paul II, as No. 27 of my list in Numism. Chron., 1910, p. 349, border of short strokes, the faint lines ruled with
but measuringonly 40 by 33 mm. No. 582,AlfonsoI d'Este, as
Armand II, 90, 4. Also various plaquettes in the general col- compasses to guide the inscription, etc.-are the
lection. Supinoin his catalegueof the Museo Nazionale (p. 275) same in both pieces. Only the portrait of
describes No. 581 as a reproductionof an engraved gem; and Frederick suffers somewhat by comparison with
such a gem may, indeed, have been the original of the medal.
21British Museum.Dept. of British and MediaevalAntiquities; the other from being a cast-an early one, be it
see Archceologia, Vol. LXII, p. 185, note on Table XL, No. 4. said-from the struck original, whereas the Rosen-
2 Published by G. Campori, Raccolta di Cataloghi ed
Invenltarii heim Maximilianis itself struck.
jiuediti (Modena, 1870), p. 29. The reverseof the latter representsthe Emperor
231 must confess to some doubtwhether" in ottone dorato"
does not refer merely to the mountin which this medal was set,
seeing that this entry occurs in conjunctionwith those quoted 25
Col, Croft Lyons calls my attention to the existence of
in the next footnote describing medals of horn. The scribe moulds in horn made from medals, apparentlyfor the purpose
may in this case have omitted the words "di corno" and of reproducing them in some soft material; but the extant
"incassata". specimens do not seem to be very early. Among a number in
24
Pp. 29, 30: " Una medagliadi corno stampatain cavo de la the possession of Mr. C. H. Read, made from French and
testa del Duca Borso quand' era zovene fornita de ottone German medals, the earliest piece represented is a large
dorato. .. . Un' altra medaglia di corno rosso cum la figura multiple-thalerof Friedrich, Duke of Brunswick, 1647; and
del Duca Borso in cavo incassata in ottone dorato cum una there is little means of judging when the mould was made.
letera interno dal cerchiello a niello. . . . Quattro medaglie in But it is not unreasonableto suppose that such moulds belong
corno rosso stampate cave fornite in ottone doratode le quale in general to the period when O'Brisset's invention made
gie ne sono due che hano lettere intornoal cerchiello aniellato portraiture in stampedhorn or whalebone popular.
et due senza, una il Duca Borso, I'altrail Co. Lorenzo,I'altrail 26 We are not here concerned with the
question of the
MarcheseNicolo, et I'altrauna Damisella". There is only one authorshipof the large cast model for a testoon, which some
medal of Borso as a young man extant, and that is the well- attribute to a copyist of Cavalli, some, with more reason, I
known piece by Amadeo da Milano. Similarlythe Marchese believe, to Cavalli himself. And we may also leave aside the
Nicolo is only representedby the medals which were discussed question of the attributionto Cavalli of the medals of Battista
in this magazine (Dec., 1907, p. 147) in connexion with Spagnoliand FrancescoBonatti,for which the groundsseem to
Amadeo. be insecure, so far as their style is concerned.
202
A A
B CD
B D
E
E.
,01!
F
w
I'
...A W
, ,!•••i i
, ,,!•,,
.
... . •' ? ?•i • ,• •? i
••i ..........•,il~
?,OrALI
• iiii~iii"•i~i~
•
p
j
.... •.............. ,•OA •
",
iii
A •'••!••
M,~~' . ......
i?O
w!i••~•i•I',,, ..
TT.... .
.i •ii •
•, ,, • ,Id"i
•,!i,•i~li!•
i'! • •-
iiii•'•!'!' '.,
O
! ii
i•i!!,
ii! !••i ' 'ii• •ii
• v• •i ii , •. .
ly
i H
,i .. !
?
? ! '•i,iii
!• ? ?.-A?
O 207
Notes on ItahlianMedals
at Florence, s and undoubtedly from the same it is dated 1581 and commemorates the restoration
hand as the large medal; but instead of bearing of a tower at Ancona. On the obverse are the
Nasi's full name, it has merely the initials B.N.V. arms of Ancona; on the reverse,the statues of SS.
P.M.Q.M. The portrait is a close reproductionof Cyriacus, Liberius and Marcellinus.3" This piece,
the largerone on a small scale, the diameterbeing hitherto the only extant work attributed to
34mm. On the reverse is a figure of Mercury Capocaccia, throws no light on his baptismal
standing to left, carryingcaduceus in left and purse name. But there is another medal," representing
in right, with the inscription NVNTIVS PACIS. Guidubaldo II della Rovere as fourth Duke
Armand, not having the large medal before him, of Urbino, which bears the signature G. B.
ingeniously identified the person as Bernardo CAPO. The Vienna specimen is illustrated in
Navagero (15o6-1565),and consequently dated the PLATEII, G. The obverse is in somewhat higher
medal in the third instead of in the first quarterof relief than the reverse, or than either side of the
the sixteenth century. The first four letters of Ancona medal, but that is doubtless due to the fact
the inscription may now be interpreted, in the that it represents an " imagine privata ", whereas
light of the large medal, as "Bernardus Nasius the others are concerned with " historie ". Between
virtute preditus"; but for M,Q.M. I have no the flat handling and overcrowded treatment of
explanation to offer. the latter subjects I see considerable resemblance;
at least, nothing to prevent our assigning them to
VI the same hand.
GIov. BATTISTA CAPOCACCIA. Ifso, Ferretti'sname for Capocacciais confirmed
In his "'Diporti Notturni", published in 1579, as against Vasari's; and, considering Ferretti's
Francesco Ferretti makes mention of "il Capo local knowledge, he is the more likely of the two
Caccia M. Gio. Battista" as an artist distinguished to be right. Guidubaldo was born in 1514; on
this medal he may well be fifty years old, which
by his skill in modelling in "stucco" not only
would bring its date down to about 1564.-6
portraits (immagini private)but whole "historic".
Vasari, on the other hand" in speaking in his Vasari'smention of the artist,as having made stucco
second edition of Capocaccia's portraits in portraitsof Plus V and Cardinal Bonelli, shows
that he was already famous before 1568, so that
stucco, gives him the baptismal name of Mario. there is no improbability in his having been
Neither writer mentions the man as medallist.
Indeed, his medallic work is of small artisticvalue, employed by the Duke of Urbino some years before.
but seeing that it has survived, whereas apparently What Vasari was thinking of when he called him
his stucco portraits have not, there is no harm in Mario it is impossible to say; but he may have
3 confused him with the goldsmith and medallist
attempting to find out the truthabout his medals. Mario of Perugia, who was beginning to make a
One signed "Opus Capocacciae" has long been
known [PLATEII, H,the British Museum specimen]; name about 1561.
84ArmandI, p. 283; Trdsorde Num., M6d, ital. II, XX, 2;
s31Armand III, p. 270 F; Supino,p. 235, No. 798. Keary, Brit. Mus. Guide to Ital. Med., No. 220; Regling,
32Ed. Milanesi,VII, p. 544. Sammlung Lanna, No. 252, P1. XVI.
33This I have endeavoured to state briefly in Thieme's -35Armand
III, p. 81.
Kiinstler-Lexikon(s.n. Capocaccia); but where illustrationsare Armand dates it about 1555; I do not know precisely upon
not possible only a bare statementof opinion can be made. what grounds.