Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People and the individual
plaintiffs have moved for preliminary injunction. [Dkt. 18] The only relief they seek, at page 15
of the motion, is “a preliminary injunction enjoining legislative elections using the current
benchmark districts.” Plaintiffs do not seek the imposition, even on a preliminary basis, of any
affirmative remedy. Their only request is that this Court immediately forbid the use of current
Plaintiffs’ request to abandon one plan with no assurance that a new one can be devised is
Case 3:11-cv-00159-TSL -EGJ -LG Document 63 Filed 04/14/11 Page 2 of 4
plainly premature. As explained in the motion of the Mississippi Republican Party Executive
Committee to strike exhibits to motion for preliminary injunction [Dkt. 62], the parties do not
dispute that the current districts are malapportioned. The Republican Party shares plaintiffs’
optimism that this Court may devise a constitutionally acceptable remedy in time for candidates
to qualify for office on June 1, 2011, so that elections may be held this year on the statutory
schedule. However, particularly because this Court has not yet set a trial date, plaintiffs can
offer no evidence that such speed is even possible, much less likely.
Unless a remedy can be established quite soon, there is at least a possibility that this
Court will instruct defendants to implement the current election plan this year. That is what this
Court did twenty years ago in Watkins v. Mabus, 771 F.Supp. 789 (S.D. Miss.), aff’d in part and
vacated in part, 502 U.S. 954 (1971). Secretary of State Hosemann’s pending motion to dismiss
[Dkt. 41] asks this Court to do the same thing this year.
Because plaintiffs have not established that the existing plan cannot be used this year, and
because their motion offers neither evidence nor argument in support of an affirmative
constitutional remedy, the relief they seek is premature. This Court should overrule the motion
for preliminary injunction without prejudice to the right of plaintiffs to raise the issue again
2
Case 3:11-cv-00159-TSL -EGJ -LG Document 63 Filed 04/14/11 Page 3 of 4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using
the ECF system which sent such notification of such filing to the following:
3
Case 3:11-cv-00159-TSL -EGJ -LG Document 63 Filed 04/14/11 Page 4 of 4