Anmerkung: Verwenden Sie die folgenden Felder, um die gemeinsamen Schriftfelder

aller PPAP-Forderungen auszufüllen.

Name des Teils
Teilenummer
Technischer Änderungsstand
Datum techn. Änderungsstand

Name der Organisation

Lieferanten-Kennnummer
Straße und Hausnummer
Stadt
Bundesland
Land
Postleitzahl
Telefonnummer
Faxnummer
Kundennummer
Division
Anwendung

Dateiname
E-Mail-Adresse
Teilevorlage-Bestätigung (Part Submission Warrant, PSW)
Name des Teils Kundenteilenummer

Zeichnungsnummer Teilenr. d. Organisation

Technischer Änderungsstand Datum

Zusätzliche technische Änderungen Datum

Ne
Sicherheits- oder gesetzl. Vorschrift Ja 'Bestellnummer Gewicht (kg)
in
Nr. d. Prüfmittels Prüfmittel, techn. Änderungsstand Datum

INFORMATION ÜBER DEN HERSTELLER INFORMATION ÜBER DIE VORLAGE ZUM KUNDEN

Name und Lieferanten-Kennnummer der Organisation Kundenname/Division

Straße, Hausnummer Einkäufer/Einkäufer-Kennnummer

Stadt Postleitzahl Land Anwendung

MATERIALBERICHTERSTATTUNG
Nei n.a
Wurden v. Kunden geforderte Informationen zu Problem-Substanzen berichtet? Ja ✘
n .
Übermittelt durch IMDS oder anderes Kundenformat: IMDS
anderes Kundenformat
Nei n.a
Sind Polymerteile mit den entsprechenden ISO-Kennzeichnungen versehen? Ja ✘
n .
GRUND DER VORLAGE (mindestens einen ankreuzen)
Erstmalige Vorlage Änderung zu optionaler Konstruktion oder optionalem Material
Technische Änderung(en) Änderung von Lieferant oder Lieferquelle des Materials
Werkzeug: Verlagerung, Ersatz, Überholung oder Zusatz-Werkzeug Änderung Teile-Bearbeitungsprozess
Korrektur eines Fehlers (discrepancy) Teile werden an einem weiteren Standort hergestellt
Werkzeug für mehr als ein Jahr inaktiv Sonstiges - Bitte angeben

GEFORDERTE VORLAGESTUFE (eine ankreuzen)

Stufe 1 - nur Bestätigung (und für ausgewiesene Aussehensteile: Bericht zur Freigabe des Aussehens) wird dem Kunden vorgelegt.
Stufe 2 - Bestätigung mit Musterteilen und eingeschränkte unterstützende Daten werden dem Kunden vorgelegt.
Stufe 3 - Bestätigung mit Musterteilen und umfassende unterstützende Daten werden dem Kunden vorgelegt.
Stufe 4 - Bestätigung und andere Anforderungen, wie sie vom Kunden festgelegt wurden.
Stufe 5 - Bestätigung mit Musterteilen und vollständige unterstützende Daten, die am Produktionsstandort der Organisation bewertet werden.

ERGEBNISSE DER VORLAGE

Ergebnisse von Maßprüfungen Material- u. Funktionsprüfungen Aussehensbeurteilungen statistischen Prozessdaten
Diese Ergebnisse erfüllen alle Anforderungen der Entwicklungsunterlagen: Ja Nein (Falls "Nein" Erklärung gefordert)
Form, Nest, Produktionsprozess

ERKLÄRUNG

Ich bestätige hiermit, dass die in dieser Bestätigung zugrunde liegenden Muster repräsentativ für unsere Teile sind und in einem Prozess hergestellt
wurden, der alle Anforderungen des Handbuchs Produktionsteil-Freigabeverfahren ( PPAP ) 4. Ausgabe erfüllt. Ich bestätige weiterhin, dass diese Muster
mit einer Produktionsrate von ______ / ______ Stunden hergestellt wurden. Ich versichere auch, dass dokumentierte Nachweise der Erfüllung dieser
Anforderungen aufbewahrt werden und für eine Bewertung verfügbar sind. Jegliche Abweichung von dieser Erklärung ist nachstehend aufgeführt.
ERKLÄRUNG/BEMERKUNGEN:

Ist jedes Kundenwerkzeug richtig gekennzeichnet und nummeriert? Ja Nein

Unterschrift des Bevollmächtigten der Organisation: Datum

Name in Druckschrift Telefon Faxnummer

Position E-Mail

NUR FÜR DEN KUNDENGEBRAUCH (FALLS ANWENDBAR)

Freigegeb Verworfe
Teilevorlage-Entscheidung Sonstiges
en n
Kundenname (Unterschrift) Datum
Name in Druckschrift Nummer zur Verfolgung beim Kunden (optional)
Appearance Approval Report

PART DRAWING APPLICATION

NUMBER NUMBER (VEHICLES)
PART BUYER E/C LEVEL DATE
NAME CODE
ORGANIZATION MANUFACTURING SUPPLIER
NAME LOCATION CODE
REASON FOR PART SUBMISSION WARRANT SPECIAL SAMPLE RE-SUBMISSION OTHER
SUBMISSION PRE TEXTURE FIRST PRODUCTION SHIPMENT ENGINEERING CHANGE
APPEARANCE EVALUATION
AUTHORIZED CUSTOMER
ORGANIZATION SOURCING AND TEXTURE INFORMATION PRE-TEXTURE REPRESENTATIVE
EVALUATION SIGNATURE AND DATE
CORRECT
AND PROCEED
CORRECT AND
RESUBMIT
APPROVED TO
ETCH/TOOL/EDM
COLOR EVALUATION
TRISTIMULUS DATA METALLIC COLOR
COLOR MASTER MASTER MATERIAL MATERIAL HUE VALUE CHROMA GLOSS BRILLIANCE SHIPPING PART
SUFFIX DL* Da* Db* DE* CMC NUMBER DATE TYPE SOURCE RED YEL GRN BLU LIGHT DARK GRAY CLEAN HIGH LOW HIGH LOW SUFFIX DISPOSITION

COMMENTS:

ORGANIZATION PHONE NO. DATE AUTHORIZED CUSTOMER DATE

SIGNATURE REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE

 Page 4 of 15 Pages

Dimensional Results
ORGANIZATION: PART NUMBER:
SUPPLIER/VENDOR CODE: PART NAME:
NAME OF INSPECTION FACILITY: DESIGN RECORD CHANGE LEVEL:
ENGINEERING CHANGE DOCUMENTS:

SPECIFICATION / QTY. NOT

ITEM DIMENSION/SPECIFICATION LIMITS TEST DATE TESTED ORGANIZATION MEASUREMENT RESULTS (DATA) OK OK

Blanket statements of conformance are unacceptable for any test results.

SIGNATURE TITLE DATE

 Page 15 of 5 Pages
Material Test Results
ORGANIZATION: PART NUMBER:
SUPPLIER/VENDOR CODE: PART NAME:
MATERIAL SUPPLIER: DESIGN RECORD CHANGE LEVEL:
*CUSTOMER SPRCIFIED SUPPLIER/VENDOR CODE: ENGINEERING CHANGE DOCUMENTS:
*If source approval is req'd, include the Supplier (Source) & Customer assigned code. NAME OF LABORATORY:
SPECIFICATION / TEST QTY. NOT
MATERIAL SPEC. NO. / REV / DATE LIMITS DATA TESTED SUPPLIER TEST RESULTS (DATA) OK OK

Blanket statements of conformance are unacceptable for any test results.

SIGNATURE TITLE DATE

 Page 6 of 15 Pages

Performance Test Results

SUPPLIER: PART NUMBER:
SUPPLIER/VENDOR CODE: PART NAME:
NAME OF LABORATORY: DESIGN RECORD CHANGE LEVEL:
*CUSTOMER SPECIFIED SUPPLIER/VENDOR CODE: ENGINEERING CHANGE DOCUMENTS:
*If source approval is req'd, include the Supplier (Source) & Customer assigned code.

SPECIFICATION / TEST QTY. SUPPLIER TEST RESULTS (DATA) / TEST NOT

TEST SPECIFICATIONS / REV / DATE LIMITS DATE TESTED CONDITIONS OK OK

Blanket statements of conformance are unacceptable for any test results.

SIGNATURE TITLE DATE

Gage Repeatability And Reproducibility Data Sheet Variable Data Results
Part Number Gage Name Appraiser A
0
Part Name Gage Number Appraiser B
0
Characteristic Gage Type Appraiser C

Characteristic Classification Trials Parts Appraisers Date Performed

0 0 0

Measurement Unit Analysis % Tolerance (Tol)

Repeatability - Equipment Variation (EV)
EV = 𝑅 ̿ x K1 Trials K1 % EV = 100 (EV/Tol)
= 2 4.56 =
= 3 3.05 =
Reproducibility - Appraiser Variation (AV)
√( 𝑋 ̅ 2 2
AV = ) {( DIFF x K2) - (EV /nr)} % AV = 100 (AV/Tol)
= =
= Appraisers 2 3 =
K2 3.65 2.70 n = number of parts
Repeatability & Reproducibility (R & R) r = number of trials
√(
R&R = {(EV2)+ AV2)} Parts K3

= 2 3.65 % R&R = 100 (R&R/Tol)

= 3 2.70 =
Part Variation (PV) 4 2.30 =
PV = RP x K3 5 2.08
= 6 1.93
= 7 1.82 % PV = 100 (PV/Tol)
Tolerance 8 1.74 =
Tol = Upper - Lower 9 1.67 =
= USL - LSL 10 1.62
=

All calculations are based upon predicting 5.15 sigma (99.0% of the area under the normal distribution curve).
K1 is 5.15/d2, where d2 is dependent on the number of trials (m) and the number if parts times the number of operators (g) which is
assumed to be greater than 15.
AV - If a negative value is calculated under the square root sign, the appraiser variation (AV) defaults to zero (0).
K2 is 5.15/d2, where d2 is dependent on the number of operators (m) and (g) is 1, since there is only one range calculation.
K2 is 5.15/d2, where d2 is dependent on the number of parts (m) and (g) is 1, since there is only one range calculation.
d2 is obtained from Table D3, "Quality Control and Industrial Statistics", A.J. Duncan.
Gage Repeatability And Reproducibility Report Short Form Attribute Results
Part Number Gage Name Appraiser A

Part Name Gage Number Appraiser B

Characterisitic/Specification Gage Type Date Performed

APPRAISER A APPRAISER B
PART # TRIAL #1 TRIAL #2 PART # TRIAL #1 TRIAL #2
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20

All measurement decisions agree? Yes Accept Gage

No Reject Gage

Remarks
ute Results
Potential Failure Mode And Effects Analysis (Design FMEA)
FMEA Number:
Item: Process Responsibility: Page: of
Model Year(s)/Program(s) Key Date Prepared By:
Core Team: FMEA Date (orig):

Process Potential Failure Mode Potential Effect(s) of Potential Cause(s) of Failure Current Process Controls Current Process Controls Recommended Responsibility & Target Action Results
Step / Failure (Prevention) (Detetion) Action Completion Date Actions Taken &

Classification
Function Effective Date

Occurrence

Occurrence
Detection

Detection
Severity

Severity
RPN

RPN
 Table 6, Page 43: PFMEA Severity Evaluation Criteria OCCURRENCE SC

SEVERITY Values (CUSTOMER EFFECT) (MANUFACTURING/ ASSEMBLY EFFECT) OCCURRENCE

SCALE

Very high severity ranking when a

potential failure mode affects safe vehicle
operation and/or involves noncompliance
Hazardous - w/o with government regulation without Or may endanger operator (machine or
10 warning warning. assembly) without warning. 10

Very high severity ranking when a

potential failure mode affects safe vehicle
Hazardous - w/ operation and/or involves noncompliance Or may endanger operator (machine or
9 warning with government regulation with warning. assembly) with warning. 9

Or 100% of product may have to be

scrapped, or vehicle/item repaired in
Vehicle/item inoperabe (loss of primary repair department with a repair time
8 Very High function). greater than one hour. 8

Or product may have to be sorted and a

portion (less than 100%) scrapped, or
Vehicle/Item operable but at a reduced vehicle/item repaired in repair
level of performance. Customer very department with a repair time between a
7 High dissatisfied half-hour and an hour. 7

Or a portion (less than 100%) of the

product may have to be scrapped with
Vehicle/Item operable but no sorting, or vehicle/item repaired in
Comfort/Convenience item(s) inoperable. repair department with a repair time less
6 Moderate Customer dissatisfied. than a half-hour. 6

Or 100%of product may have to be

Vehicle/Item operable but reworked, or vehicle/item repaired off-
Comfort/Convenience item(s) operable at line but does not go to repair
5 Low a reduced level of performance. department. 5

Fit and Finish/Squeak and Rattle item Or the product may have to be sorted,
does not conform. Defect noticed by with no scrap, and a portion (less than
4 Very Low most customers (greater than 75%). 100%) reworked. 4

Fit and Finish/Squeak and Rattle item Or a portion (less than 100%) of the
does not conform. Defect noticed by 50% product may have to be reworked, with
3 Minor of customers. no scrap, on-line but out-of-station. 3

Fit and Finish/Squeak and Rattle item Or a portion (less than 100%) of the
does not conform. Defect noticed by product may have to be reworked, with
2 Very Minor discriminating customers (less than 25%). no scrap, on-line but out-of-station. 2

Or slight inconvenience to operation or

1 None No discernible effect. operator, or no effect. 1
Potential Failure Mode And Effects Analysis (Process FMEA)
FMEA Number:

Item: Process Responsibility: Page: of

Model Year(s)/Program(s) Key Date Prepared By:
Core Team: FMEA Date (orig):

Process Potential Failure Mode Potential Effect(s) of Potential Cause(s) of Failure Current Process Controls Current Process Controls Recommended Responsibility & Action Results
Step / Failure (Prevention) (Detetion) Action Target
Function Completion Date Actions Taken &

Classification
Effective Date

Occurrence

Occurrence
Detection

Detection
Severity

Severity
RPN

RPN
Process Flow Diagram
Part Number: DATE:
Part Description: ECL:
Prepared By: PREPARED BY:
FABRICATION

INSPECT
STORE
MOVE

ITEM #

ITEM #
OPERATION PRODUCT AND PROCESS
STEP DESCRIPTION CHARACTERISTICS CONTROL METHODS

WGW-QUA-F-092 14-Jun-13
Control Plan
Prototype Pre-Launch Production

Control Plan Number Key Contact/Phone Date (Orig.) Date (Rev.)

Part Number/Latest Change Level Core Team Customer Engineering Approval/Date (If Req'd.)

Part Name/Description Supplier/Plant Approval/Date Customer Quality Approval/Date (If Req'd.)

Supplier/Plant Supplier Code Other Approval/Date (If Req'd.) Other Approval/Date (If Req'd.)

Part / Process Name / Machine, Reactiion Plan

Process Operation Device, Jig, CHARACTERISTICS METHODS

Classification
Number Description Tools for
Manufacturing, SAMPLE
etc… Evaluation / SIZE FREQ.
Product / Process Measurement
Number Product Process Specification / Tolerance Technique Control Method
 The following items should also be included in your PPAP submittal:
Design Records - (i.e A ballooned copy of the drawing / model
1 that corresponds to the Dimensional, Mateiral and Performance
2 Results)
Authorized Engineering Change Documents
12 Initial process capability studies.
16 Master Sample (usually six sample parts)
17 Checking Aids
18 Customer-specific Requirements
13
Laboratory Accreditation (e.g. A2LA documentation, ISO
documentation, etc .)
3 Customer Engineering Approval
11 Initial Sample Inspection Report
15 Sample Production Parts