Sie sind auf Seite 1von 8

This material is posted here with permission of the IEEE.

Such permission of
the IEEE does not in any way imply IEEE endorsement of any of Helsinki
University of Technology's products or services. Internal or personal use of
this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this
material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective
works for resale or redistribution must be obtained from the IEEE by writing to
pubs-permissions@ieee.org.

By choosing to view this document, you agree to all provisions of the copyright
laws protecting it.
© 2000 IEEE. Reprinted with permission from Proceedings of the IEEE Semiannual Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC 2000 Fall). Boston, USA,
September 24-28, 2000, pp. 1603-1609.

PerformanceAnalysis of GSM Traffic Channel Capacity With(out) High


Speed Circuit Switched Data

Jahangir H. Sarker", Seppo J. Halme* and Mika Rinne**

*Communications Laboratory, Helsinki University Of Technology.


P. 0. Box. 2300, FIN-02015 HUT, Finland, Phone: +358 0 451 [2347,2367] /fax: +358 0 451 2345
E-mail: jahangirsarker @ hut& seppo.halme @ hut.fi

** Nokia Research Centre, P.O.Box 407, FIN-00045 Nokia Group,


Helsinki, Finland, Phone: +358-9-43766521/Fax: +358-9-43766856
E-mail: mikaxinne @nokia.com

Abstract 1. Introduction
Analytical techniques for the analysis of the Expectations show increasing demands for a
traflc channel capacity in the Global System for Mobile wide range of .services from voice, from low to high
(GSM) Communiccttions are studied in this paper. The bitrate data and advanced data services for cellular
results are represented for High Speed Circuit-Switched communication system. In the beginning of the century,
Data (HSCSD) trafic channels eo-existing with the voice the mobile subscribers will enjoy various kinds of data
trafic channels in a GSM cell. In a GSM system the base services along with the regular voice service. The
station has a finite number of traflc channels,from which worldwide activities are defining third generation
one voice terminal occupies one traffic channel. The mobile radio systems: International Mobile
admission priority for voice services is higher than that of Telecommunications by the year 2000 (IMT-2000), in
the HSCSD data. On the other hand, one HSCSD terminal the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), or
can occupy multiple number of channels if needed, Universal Mobile Telecommunication System
provided that they clre available. The HSCSD terminal will (UMTS), in Europe. The implemented 3rd generation
release its reserved traffic channels only after the data system will provide service to anyone, anytime
transmission is completed. The presence of HSCSD anywhere in all radio environments. The WCDMA
services slightly increases the blocking probability of the based third generation system will provide the services:
voice terminals, The results in this paper show the steady- voice, low rate data (144 kbh) in vehicular, medium
state channel utilization and blocking probability of voice rate data (384 kb/s) for outdoor and indoor and up to 2
terminals under the constraints where voice terminals Mb/s for indoor environment [ 11.
occupy one traffic channel at a time and data terminals
can occupy multiple number of traffic channels. The Currently, more than 1 billion subscribers
results show that for a defined acceptable voice blocking worldwide use the three most successful Znd
probability, the overall channel utilization increases with generation TDMA based cellular systems: GSM,
the higher number of HSCSD terminals allowed per base TDMA (136) and PDC, where speech is the main
station as well as with the higher number of channels teleservice. Mobile communication network
allowed to be allocated for each HSCSD terminal. The operators are facing the demand for new mobile
traflc channel utilization also increases if the acceptable subscribers, and they are expanding their networks
blocking probability for voice terminals is allowed to continuously. Some operators may not be able to get
increase. The analytical model represented herein is license to 31d generation spectrum to support the new
general. Therefore, the channel utilization and the voice services, like high-speed data. Some operators are not
blocking probability results are calculated both with and willing to consider jump to the 31d generation system
without the HSCSD traflc channels. These numerical due to its large- investment in the current Znd
cases can be obtained by appropriate parameter setting generation technology. Therefore they are looking for
from the same process model. possible solutions to achieve the services comparable

0-7803-6507-0/00/$10.00 02000 IEEE 1603 VTC 2000


to the 31d generation in the existing 2"d generation of the overall channel utilization are expected to be
systems [2]. positive. This important issue is the main concern of
this paper. A simulation study regarding a similar
The European Telecommunications Standard matter was carried out by Neale et a1 [13]. An
Institute (ETSI) is defining two new technologies for analytical approach is developed in this paper using
data services, called General Packet Radio Services multi-dimensional Erlang loss formula [ 14-151.
(GPRS) and High Speed Circuit-Switched Data
(HSCSD) over the existing GSM system as the phase 2+ The multi-dimensional Erlang loss model
standard. In the existing GSM system each mobile can be converted to one-dimensional model [16].
terminal can occupy a single traffic channel for the whole Here we used this technique, which makes the
transmission period. The GPRS and HSCSD terminals calculation for overall traffic channel utilization as
will occupy multiple number of slots. The existing voice well as the voice blocking probability easier and is
transmission is a circuit-switched based on the other presented in section 2.
hand GPRS is a packet based data transmission system.
The data packet created from GPRS can be transmitted One of the main concerns of the mobile
through the unused voice traffic channels. Therefore the operators is to achieve the higher traffic channel
traffic channel efficiency with GPRS is always higher utilization while keeping the voice blocking
than that of the without GPRS. Since the traffic channels probability under a certain limit. In section 4 the
are used to transmits GPRS packets when they are result show the channel utilization for a defined value
unused by the voice terminals, the voice terminals do not of the voice blocking probability. Finally, in section 5
suffer any blocking for GPRS terminals [3-51. the conclusions indicate the HSCSD and the GPRS to
potentially meet the future data transmission needs.
In HSCSD, one data terminal may occupy
multiple number of traffic channels, if needed and if the
network has resource available [6]. The data terminals
occupy these multiple number of channels up to 2. Analysis
completing their data transmission time. The higher
priority voice connections suffer higher blocking
probability when HSCSD terminals are working in the A. State probabilities
network. The blocking probabilities with HSCSD are
discussed extensively in [7] using multi-dimensional Let us consider a base station having M
Markov chain. The blocking probabilities and their number of traffic channels. Assuming two types of
properties with multi-dimensional Markov model are connections: voice terminals (VTs) and data
also discussed in [8-101. Stasiak carried an excellent terminals (DTs). The call arrival process of voice
work in [ll], where he developed the determined terminals is independent with an average rate of A,,
distributions using combinatorial method. The
determined distribution enable calculation of blocking and the duration of each voice call is exponential
probabilities in multi-stage switching networks carrying with mean 1 ,Uv. The voice traffic intensity of all
different multi-channel traffic streams. voice terminals is thus p , = A, I p, .

Traffic channel utilization is an important The maximum allowed data terminals in a


measure for the operators. The operators are charging given base station is K, and each data terminal can
depending on the traffic channel utilization among the occupy maximum N slots (or N channels). In the multi-
other things. One of the most important criteria for the dimensional system model K data terminals will make
operators is to keep the blocking probabilities under a
K dimensions and another dimension will be for voice
certain limit. The GPRS is an effective solution, where terminals. Thus, the system has K+l dimensions
one data terminal can transmit the data using multiple overall. Since each data terminal represents one
number of traffic channels without increasing voice separate dimension, the traffic of each data terminal
blocking probability and with higher traffic channel has to be considered separately. One special
efficiency. Unfortunately, it may suffer high delay during
assumption was made here. Each data terminal
congestion period of the network. Some services like occupies a multiple number of traffic channels at a
video stream need to transmit their data using multiple time. We assumed that the multiple arrival of each data
traffk channels almost with constant delay. In this case, terminal into different traffic channels is independent
the HSCSD provides the solution [12]. The HSCSD and exponentially distributed with mean A,,. Similarly,
increases the voice blocking probability, but the impacts

0-7803-6507-0/00/$10.00 02000 IEEE 1604 VTC 2000


each data terminal will release multiple number of traffic Probability that 1 channel is occupied by either K DTs
channels at a time. It was assumed that the departure of a or by j VTs is
given data terminal from its traffic channel is independent
and exponentially distributed with average rate p,,. The
call intensity of each data terminal is thus p,r = 2, / p , / .

Let us consider that there is K number of DTs is


in the system. Since the DTs calls are limited by the
number of channels N. So 0 5 n, 5 N , for 0 5 ini
5M ,
i=l

where M is the total number of traffic channels in a given


base station. The number of VTs is not limited. If j defines
the number of VTs in that system, then 0 I j I M .
The state (n,,n 2 ,...n,, j ) defines the probability Probability that 2 channels are occupied by
that K number of DTs occupying n, ,n2,...nK , channels either K DTs or by j VTs calls are:
and j number o f VTs is in the system. Q(2)= p(2.0 ,....O,O)+p(l,l..._, o,o)+ . . . + / I ( 1.0....,1,0)+P(1,0,._..0.1)+/7(0,2,...,o,o)+
...+p( 0.1 ....,l,O)+p(O.I ,..., 0.1)+ ...+p( 0.0 ,.__, 2,o)+p(o.o ,.... 1,1)+p(o.o,.-,0.2)
Let us consider the state ( n ,,0, ...0, 0), i.e., the
probability that the only one DT is in the system and is r
occupying n, channels and no other terminals are active,
which can be shown [ 191
p ( q , O,...O,O)=-p(0,O
Pd"'
,...0,O) O I n , <:N
n,! L
Similarly, the probability that j number of VT calls but no
DT calls is For the range 0 I k I N , it can be shown
~ ( o ,,...
o o,~)=+~(o,o,.:.o,o)
Pi O Sj < M (2) applying the same procedure as from Eq. ( 5 ) and (6),
J! that the probability of k channels are occupied by K
data terminals and or j voice terminals calls is
yielding the probability that K number of DT calls and j
number of VT calls are in the system is

K
L
O l n i I N , 05 j < M , 0 5 x n i +j I M (3) OIkSN
i=l

Let us consider the case where k > N. The


Let us consider this K+1 dimensional state probability that N+l channels are occupied is given by
probability model as a one-dimensional state probability
model. Since there are M number of traffic channels, the Q(n+l)= p ( N , 1,...,O,O)+ p ( N - 1,2,..., O,O)+ ...+ p(0, N , _..,1,O) ...
system states will be from 0 to M. + p(o.0 ,..., N,1)+ ...+ p(0,o )...,1, N)+ p(0,o,..., 0, N + 1)

Assuming ~ ( k as) the probability that K number


of DTs and j number of VTs occupies k channels.

The probability that the system is idle can be written as

0-7803-6507-0/00/%10.00 02000 IEEE 1605 VTC 2000


Similarly the probability that N+2 channels are B. Channel Utilization and Voice
occupied Blocking Probability
Q(n + 2 ) = p ( N , 2 , ...,0.0)+ p ( N - 1,3, ..., 0,O)+ ... + p(0, N , ...,2,0)+
...+ p(O,O, .... N , 2 ) + ...+ p(0,O ,..., 1, N + 1) + p(0.0 ,...,0, N + 2 ) The channel utilization can be defined as the
ratio of the average number of channels used to the
total number of channels in the system. So the channel
utilization can be written as

(9)
In general for the values of k in between If all M channels are occupied, a new VT
N I k 5 M as Eqs. (8) and (9) we obtain call will be blocked. The probability for that is
termed as blocking probability for VT terminals, B, ,
and can be written from Eqs. (1 1) as
B, = Q(M)

N I k I M

Combining the Eqs. (7) and (10) the probability ( i=l )


that k channels out of M channels are occupied is (14)

Where the probability that all channels are free Q(0)


can be found from Eq. (12).

3.Numerical Analysis and Discussions

A. Channel Utilization and Voice Blocking


Probability

and from Eq. (7) Channel utilization and the voice blocking
probability is calculated with the variation of voice
traffic intensity, p,, for different values of the
maximum allowed channels for one data terminal N ,
where the total number of traffic channels in the base
r -I station, M = 40 has been assumed. Figure 1 & Figure
2 are shown for two different values of data traffic
intensity, pd.
It is obvious, when data traffic intensity pd
L is zero, there is no effect on the channel utilization
(12) nor on voice blocking probability with the variation
of maximum number of channels occupied by one
data terminal, N . If we set the number of the
W e claimed that the analysis is so general that it maximum channels occupied by one data terminal N
can be validate without HSCSD with a very simple equal to zero, only voice terminals will be in the
modification. The equation for voice only transmission can system. It is obvious that channel utilization increases
be obtained from the Eqs. (1 1) and (12) by three different with the increase of the maximum number of allowed
ways. (1) Set the number of data terminals K = 0, (2) Set channels for one data terminal, N. But it also
the maximum number of allowed channels per data increases the blocking probability for the voice
terminal N = 0, and finally, (3) Set the data traffk intensity terminals.
for every data terminal p,, = 0.

0-7803-65@7-0/00/$10.00 02000 IEEE 1606 VTC 2000


...
Y.'
I I I
11 IO IS 11
Data traffic PJ
(a)

. ... 0 10 20 10 4U

Voice traffic P,
(b)
Figure 7: (a) Channel utilization U and (6) voice blocking
probability vs. voice traffic intensity p v , for dizerent
values of maximuni number of channels allowed for one
data terminal. The data trafic intensity pd = 6 .
Figure 3: (a) Channel utilization U and (6) voice
blocking probability B, vs. data trafic intensity pd,
for different values of maximum number of channels
allowed for one data terminal, N. The voice trafic
intensity p, =IO. The dotted line shows the
characteristicswithout HSCSD.

Channel utilization U and the voice blocking


probabilities are shown in Figures 3 and 4 with the
variation of data traffic intensity p d .The average voice
traffic intensity p , is set to 10 and 25 respectively. If
the maximum allowed number of channels per data
terminal, equals to 0, i.e., whatever the value of voice
traffic intensity, p v , channel utilization is the same.
The reason is that, no DT can get a service, if DTs are
n IO 211 UI #I
completely blocked by setting N = 0. The same will
Voice tnffic A
happen if the data traffic intensity pd = 0, whatever
(b)
Figure 2: Channel utilization U and voice blocking the value of maximum allowed channel per data
probability B, vs. voice trafic intensity p,,, for different terminal. The linear curves of channel utilization and
voice blocking probability is shown in Figs. 3 and 4
values of maximuni number of channels allowed for one
when only the voice terminals are present in the
data terminal, N. The data traffic intensity pn = 2. The system.
dotted line shows the characteristicswithout HSCSD.

0-7803-6507-0/00/$10.00 @ZOO0 IEEE 1607 VTC 2000


0.6 '
0
I
5
I
IO
I
I5
I
20
I....
M SO NI 711 MI
Number of traffic channel M
UI IIX)

Datatraffic pd (a)
(4
I Kl
11.9 I 1 I l l
It 1 I I

Without HSCSD

I 11 ---I
I i-"
N=2,p,,=2 -
N=6,p,,=G

- I I ~ ~
0
I
5
0
I
10
Datatraffic Pd
I
15
I
21)

(b) I I 1 I I I
Figure 4: Channel utilization U and voice blocking
probability B , vs. data trafic intensity p J ,for differen2
values of maximum number of channels allowed for one
data terminal, N. The voice trafic intensity p, = 25. The Without HSCSD
dotted line shows the characteristics without HSCSD.
-*
0.75

4. Optimum Number of Traffic Channels 5


Per Base Station
I.. ,
(0 .w NI 111 Ro 90 100

The optimum number of traffic channels per Number of traffic channel M


base station will give the higher channel utilization as (c)
well as keep the blocking probability under a defined Fig. 5: Channel utilization vs. the total number of
value. The voice call blocking probability is defined trafic channels in a base station.
to account either 1% [17]or 2% [18]. We used these
values of blocking probabilities in Eq. (14) and found Table 1 shows higher overall channel
the channel traffic utilization using Eq. (13). The utilization with increasing HSCSD number of
results are depicted in Figure 5. The Figure 5 shows channels. If the number of HSCSD channels
that the channel utilization with the HSCSD is higher increases, the maximum amount of voice traffic
than that without HSCSD pertaining to the acceptable intensity p,,, decreases, for a given blocking
voice blocking probability. The channel utilization probability. The overall traffic channel utilization
also increases with the increased number of HSCSD increases because of higher channel occupied by
terminals, K for an acceptable limit of voice blocking HSCSD terminals.
probability.

0-7803-6507-0/00/$10.00 02000 IEEE 1608 VTC 2000


Table 1: The maximum voice traffic intensity p, [6] GSM 02.34, V5.1.0, “Digital cellular
decreases with the increase of HSCSD channels, but telecommunication system (Phase 2+); high speed
the overall corre rponding traffic channel utilization circuit switched data (HSCSD); Stage 1, July 1997.
U increases. The allowed voice terminal blocking [7] D. Calin and D. Zeghlache, “Analysis of GSM
probability is limited to 2%. The number of data HSCSD service with channel allocation constraints”,
terminals is K = 5. Multiaccess, Mobility, and Teletrafic for Wireless
~ = 5B , = O 0 2 Communications: Volume 3, Ed. By K. Leung and B.
1 I/-
, N o HSCSDI lP1 = 2 . N = 2 P d - 4 , N I
= 4 ipd = 6 , N =61 pd= 8 . N =8,
Vojcic, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999, pp. 237-
252.
I MI
U
[8] A. A. Nilsson, M. Perry, A. Gersht and V. B.
Iversen, “On multi-rate Erlang-B computations”,
Proc. ITC16, 1999, pp. 1051-1060.
[9] J. S . Kaufman, “Blocking in a shared resource
environment”, IEEE Transactions on
~

~~~~~~~~~~
Communications, Vol. COM-29, No. 10, October
8801 086 8210 0 8 7446 086 6636 086 5801 087 1981, pp. 1474-1481.
[ 101 J. M. Aein, “A multi-class, blocked-calls-
cleared, demand access model”, IEEE Transactions
on Communications, Vol. COM-26, No. 3, March
1978, pp. 374-385.
[ 113 M. Stasiak, “Combinatorial considerations for
5. Conclusions switching systems carrying multi-channel traffic
streams”, Proc. 1TC 14, 1994, pp. 1229-1238.
GSM must extend its services particularly [ 121 J. Dunlop, “Potential for compressed video
the HSCSD services. An analytical approach was transmission over the GSM HSCSD service”,
carried out to show the channel utilization with and Electronics Letters, 16‘hJanuary, 1997, Vol. 33, No.
without the HSCSD. The results showed that the 2, pp. 121-122.
overall traffic channel utilization increases with the [ 131 J. D. Neale and E. V. Jones, “Audio-visual news
increase of HSCSD channels. Therefore, depending reports over dual standard mobile terminals”
this results operators can be deployed to implement Personal Communications in the 21st Century (11)
HSCSD along with the GPRS to achieve the 3d (Ref. No. 1998/242), IEE Colloquium on , 1998 ,pp.
generation capability. 411 -416.
[14] G. Frenkel, “The grade of service in multiple-
access satellite communications systems with demand
assignments”, IEEE Tran. Comm. Oct., 1974, pp.
REFERENCES 1681-1685.
[ l ] T. Ojanpera and R. Prasad, Ed., Wideband CDMA [ 151 J. M. Aein, “Satellite capacity allocation”, Proc.
for third generation mobile communication, Artech IEEE, Vol. 65, NO. 3, Mar. 1977, pp. 332-342.
House, 1998. [ 161 J. H. Sarker, “An analysis of multi-dimensional
[2] U. Amin and S . Chennakeshu, ‘The evolution of Erlang formula for TDMA based cellular networks”,
TDMA to 3 G , fEEE Personal Communications, June lnt. Cons Comp. and Informa. Tech., Dhaka,
1999, pp. 6-7. Bangladesh, December 18-20, 1998, pp. 12-16.
[3] G. Brasche and B. Walke, “Concept, services, and [17] M. Frullone, C. Carciofi, G. Riva and P.
protocols of the new phase 2+ general packet radio Grazioso, “Interference analysis and planning
services”, IEEE Communications Magazine, August requirements for data over voice in cellular systems”,
1997, pp. 94-104. IEICE Transaction on Fundamentals, Vol. E79-A,
[4] J. Cai and D. J. Goodman, “General packet radio NO. 7, July 1996, pp. 968-974.
service in GSM”, IEEE Communications Magazine, [18] M. Mouly and M.-B. Pautet, The GSM system
October 1997, pp. 122-131. for mobile communications, Published by authors,
[5] GSM 03.64, V5.1.0, “Digital cellular 1992.
telecommunication system (Phase 2+); general packet [19] K. W. Ross, “Multiservice loss models for
radio service (GPRS); overall description of the GPRS broadband telecommunication networks”, Springer,
radio interface (Sage 2),” November 1997. 1995.

0-7803-6507-0/00i$10.00 02000 IEEE 1609 VTC 2000

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen