Sie sind auf Seite 1von 4

Antenna Polarization

Antenna polarization is a very important consideration when choosing and installing an antenna.
Most communications systems use vertical, horizontal or circular polarization. Knowing the
difference between polarizations and how to maximize their benefit is very important to the
antenna user.

A Polarization Review

An antenna is a transducer that converts radio frequency electric current to electromagnetic


waves that are then radiated into space. The electric field or "E" plane determines the
polarization or orientation of the radio wave. In general, most antennas radiate either linear or
circular polarization.

A linear polarized antenna radiates wholly in one plane containing the direction of propagation. In
a circular polarized antenna, the plane of polarization rotates in a circle making one complete
revolution during one period of the wave. If the rotation is clockwise looking in the direction of
propagation, the sense is called right-hand-circular (RHC). If the rotation is counterclockwise, the
sense is called left-hand-circular (LHC).

An antenna is said to be vertically polarized (linear) when its electric field is perpendicular to the
Earth's surface. An example of a vertical antenna is a broadcast tower for AM radio or the "whip"
antenna on an automobile.

Horizontally polarized (linear) antennas have their electric field parallel to the Earth's surface.
Television transmissions in the USA use horizontal polarization.

A circular polarized wave radiates energy in both the horizontal and vertical planes and all planes
in between. The difference, if any, between the maximum and the minimum peaks as the
antenna is rotated through all angles, is called the axial ratio or ellipticity and is usually specified
in decibels (dB). If the axial ratio is near 0 dB, the antenna is said to be circular polarized. If the
axial ratio is greater than 1-2 dB, the polarization is often referred to as elliptical.

Important Considerations

Polarization is an important design consideration. The polarization of each antenna in a system


should be properly aligned. Maximum signal strength between stations occurs when both
stations are using identical polarization.

When choosing an antenna, it is an important consideration as to whether the polarization is


linear or elliptical. If the polarization is linear, is it vertical or horizontal? If circular, is it RHC or
LHC?

On line-of-sight (LOS) paths, it is most important that the polarization of the antennas at both
ends of the path use the same polarization. In a linearly polarized system, a misalignment of
polarization of 45 degrees will degrade the signal up to 3 dB and if misaligned 90 degrees the
attenuation can be 20 dB or more. Likewise, in a circular polarized system, both antennas must
have the same sense. If not, an additional loss of 20 dB or more will be incurred.

Also note that linearly polarized antennas will work with circularly polarized antennas and vice
versa. However, there will be up to a 3 dB loss in signal strength. In weak signal situations, this
loss of signal may impair communications.

1
Cross polarization is another consideration. It happens when unwanted radiation is present from
a polarization which is different from the polarization in which the antenna was intended to
radiate. For example, a vertical antenna may radiate some horizontal polarization and vice
versa. However, this is seldom a problem unless there is noise or strong signals nearby.

Typical Applications

Vertical polarization is most often used when it is desired to radiate a radio signal in all directions
such as widely distributed mobile units. Vertical polarization also works well in the suburbs or out
in the country, especially where hills are present. As a result, nowadays most two-way Earth to
Earth communications in the frequency range above 30 MHz use vertical polarization.

Horizontal polarization is used to broadcast television in the USA. Some say that horizontal
polarization was originally chosen because there was an advantage to not have TV reception
interfered with by vertically polarized stations such as mobile radio. Also, man made radio noise
is predominantly vertically polarized and the use of horizontal polarization would provide some
discrimination against interference from noise.

In the early days of FM radio in the 88-108 MHz spectrum, the radio stations broadcasted
horizontal polarization. However, in the 1960's, FM radios became popular in automobiles which
used vertical polarized receiving whip antennas. As a result, the FCC modified Part 73 of the
rules and regulations to allow FM stations to broadcast RHC or elliptical polarization to improve
reception to vertical receiving antennas as long as the horizontal component was dominant.

Circular polarization is most often use on satellite communications. This is particularly desired
since the polarization of a linear polarized radio wave may be rotated as the signal passes
through any anomalies (such as Faraday rotation) in the ionosphere. Furthermore, due to the
position of the Earth with respect to the satellite, geometric differences may vary especially if the
satellite appears to move with respect to the fixed Earth bound station. Circular polarization will
keep the signal constant regardless of these anomalies.

What is Available

As stated earlier, for best performance, it is desirable to use an antenna with the same
polarization on both ends of a communications path. If a system is already in place all that is
required is to find out what polarization is presently being used and match it.

Most base station antenna providers will supply either vertical or horizontal polarized antennas.
They are the most economical types. Furthermore, vertically polarized antennas seem to be the
most popular for two way communications, as stated above, while horizontal polarization is most
predominant in broadcast communications such as TV and FM.

Circularly polarized antennas are normally more costly than linear polarized types since true
circular polarization is difficult to attain. An example of a true circularly polarized antenna is the
helix.

However, the most common circularly polarized antenna uses crossed Yagis for "near circular" or
elliptical polarization. Elliptical polarization can be generated by placing two identical linear
polarized Yagis at right angles (90 degree phase differential) to each other and then feeding them
with equal power and a phasing network. A well made antenna of this type will have a typical
axial ratio of +/-1 to 3 dB. In special applications, crossed Yagi antennas can be configured to
accept either RHC or LHC by a selection relay.

2
Other Considerations

If your antenna is to be located on an existing tower or building with other antennas in the vicinity,
try to separate the antennas as far as possible from each other. In the UHF range, increasing
separation even a few extra feet may significantly improve performance from problems such as
desensitization.

When setting up your own exclusive communications link, it may be wise to first test the link with
vertical and then horizontal polarization to see which yields the best performance (if any). If there
are any reflections in the area, especially from structures or towers, one polarization may
outperform the other. Furthermore, if there are other RF signals in an area, using a polarization
opposite the predominant high level signals will give some isolation as discussed earlier.

On another note, when radio waves strike a smooth reflective surface, they may incur a 180
degree phase shift, a phenomenon known as specular or mirror image reflection. The reflected
signal may then destructively or constructively affect the direct LOS signal. Circular polarization
has been used to an advantage in these situations since the reflected wave would have a
different sense than the direct wave and block the fading from these reflections.

Diversity Reception

Even if the polarizations are matched, other factors may affect the strength of the signal. The
most common are long and short term fading. Long term fading results from changes in the
weather (such as barometric pressure or precipitation) or when a mobile station moves behind
hills or buildings. Short term fading is often referred to as "multipath" fading since it results from
reflected signals interfering with the LOS signal.

Some of these fading phenomenons can be decreased by the use of diversity reception. This
type of system usually employs dual antennas and receivers with some kind of "voting" system to
choose the busiest signal. However, for best results, the antennas should be at least 20
wavelengths apart so that the signals are no longer correlated. This would be 20-25 feet at 880
MHz, quite a structural problem.

Nowadays we are inundated with mobile radios and cellular telephones. The polarization on
handheld units is often random depending on how they are held by the user. This has led to new
studies which have found that polarization diversity can be an advantage. The most important
break through in this area is that the antennas at the base station do not have to be separated
physically as described above. They can be collocated as long as they are orthogonal and well
isolated from each other. Only time will tell if these systems are truly cost effective.

Summary

Polarization in an important parameter and consideration when selecting an antenna. It helps to


have a good grasp of all the aspects of this subject. Hopefully the information contained in this
paper will answer some of your questions. Other antenna considerations are discussed in
reference

3
Advantages of Vertical Polarization

Simple vertical antennas can be used to provide OMNIDIRECTIONAL (all directions)


communication. This is an advantage when communications must take place from a moving
vehicle. In some overland communications, such as in vehicular installations, antenna heights are
limited to 3 meters (10 feet) or less. In such instances vertical polarization results in a stronger
receiver signal than does horizontal polarization at frequencies up to about 50 megahertz. From
approximately 50 to 100 megahertz, vertical polarization results in a slightly stronger signal than
does horizontal polarization with antennas at the same height. Above 100 megahertz, the
difference in signal strength is negligible. For transmission over bodies of water, vertical
polarization is much better than horizontal polarization for antennas at the lower heights. As the
frequency increases, the minimum antenna height decreases. At 30 megahertz, vertical
polarization is better for antenna heights below about 91 meters (300 feet); at 85 megahertz,
antenna heights below 15 meters (50 feet); and still lower heights at the high frequencies.
Therefore, at ordinary antenna mast heights of 12 meters (40 feet), vertical polarization is
advantageous for frequencies less than about 100 megahertz. Radiation is somewhat less
affected by reflections from aircraft flying over the transmission path when vertical polarization is
used instead of horizontal polarization. With horizontal polarization, such reflections cause
variations in received signal strength. This factor is important in locations where aircraft traffic is
heavy. When vertical polarization is used, less interference is produced or picked up because of
strong vhf and uhf broadcast transmissions (television and fm). This is because vhf and uhf
transmissions use horizontal polarization. This factor is important when an antenna must be
located in an urban area having several televisions and fm broadcast stations.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen