Sie sind auf Seite 1von 86

“Analysis of celebrity endorsement as an

effective destination marketing tool”

Robert van der Veen

Bournemouth University – United Kingdom


Fachhochschule Heilbronn - Germany

Master of Arts in European Tourism Management 2003/2004


Abstract

Commercial companies use celebrities with target customer segments to increase the
appeal of their offerings. The instrument of celebrity endorsement has nowadays
become a pervasive element in advertising and communication management. Whilst
many strategic as well as tactical aspects of celebrity endorsement effectiveness have
come under scrutiny from a manufacturing product marketing perspective, the
concept of celebrity endorsement for hedonic consumption, in particular destinations
is an often overlooked and under-researched strategy.

This study will therefore posit a discussion of celebrity destination endorsement by


providing an exploratory review of the concept that is based on an analysis of existing
academic and conceptual literature on destination marketing and on celebrity
endorsement in marketing management. Furthermore, marketing experts are consulted
in order to contribute to the literature with new and deeper information. Here the main
focus is on the perception of the interviewees relating to aspects of celebrity
destination endorsement within a framework of celebrity endorsement in general.

Therefore, by using a theoretical inquiry, it is not the researcher’s intention to


establish ‘facts’ but rather identify the experts’ interpretations and perceptions in
order to understand and determine the effectiveness of celebrity endorsement as a
destination marketing instrument. As such, this study contributes to an understanding
of the application of a marketing device for a hedonic product in general, and it also
increases understanding of celebrity endorsement as a destination marketing tool.

i
Table of contents
ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................................ I
TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................................................II
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................IV
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................1
1.1 RATIONALE FOR STUDY ........................................................................................................1
1.2 AIM AND OBJECTIVES ...........................................................................................................2
1.3 RESEARCH PLAN ...................................................................................................................3
1.4 STRUCTURE OF DISSERTATION .............................................................................................3
CHAPTER II DESTINATION MARKETING ...............................................................................5
2.1 MARKETING..........................................................................................................................5
2.2 DESTINATION ........................................................................................................................7
2.3 DESTINATION IMAGE ............................................................................................................8
2.4 MARKET .............................................................................................................................. 10
2.5 EVALUATION ....................................................................................................................... 12
2.6 CONCLUSION....................................................................................................................... 14
CHAPTER III CELEBRITY ENDORSEMENT ....................................................................... 15
3.1 ADVERTISING ...................................................................................................................... 15
3.2 CULTURAL MEANING AND THE ENDORSER ........................................................................ 17
3.3 ENDORSEMENT AS A PROMOTIONAL STRATEGY................................................................ 17
3.4 CELEBRITY ENDORSEMENT ................................................................................................ 19
3.5 CELEBRITY ENDORSEMENT FOR THE BRAND ..................................................................... 21
3.6 CHARACTERISTICS OF CELEBRITY ENDORSEMENT ........................................................... 22
3.7 IMPLICATIONS OF CELEBRITY ENDORSEMENT .................................................................. 23
3.8 SELECTING THE ‘RIGHT’ CELEBRITY................................................................................. 26
3.8.1 Performer Q-ratings ...................................................................................................... 26
3.8.2 Celebrity credibility ........................................................................................................ 27
3.8.3 Celebrity match up ......................................................................................................... 29
3.8.4 Celebrity attractiveness .................................................................................................. 31
3.8.5 The Meaning Transfer Model ....................................................................................... 32
3.8.6 Miscellaneous considerations........................................................................................ 33
3.9 CONCLUSION....................................................................................................................... 33
CHAPTER IV METHODOLOGY.............................................................................................. 35
4.1 RESEARCH PLAN ................................................................................................................. 35
4.2 AIM ...................................................................................................................................... 35
4.2.1 Objectives ....................................................................................................................... 35
4.3 SECONDARY DATA .............................................................................................................. 36
4.3.1 Limitations to secondary data........................................................................................ 37
4.4 PRIMARY DATA ................................................................................................................... 39
4.4.1 Sampling ........................................................................................................................ 39
4.4.2 Data collection ............................................................................................................... 40
4.4.3 Limitations to primary data ........................................................................................... 41
4.5 CONCLUSION....................................................................................................................... 42
CHAPTER V FINDINGS................................................................................................................ 43
5.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 43
5.2 ANALYSIS OF PRIMARY DATA ............................................................................................. 43
5.3 CONCLUSION....................................................................................................................... 48
CHAPTER VI CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................. 49
REFERENCES

ii
APPENDICES
APPENDIX I
EXAMPLE OF THE E-MAIL WITH THE IN DEPTH QUESTIONS
APPENDIX II
RESPONSES TO THE E-MAIL

List of tables
TABLE 1. CONTRIBUTION OF MARKETING RESEARCH TO DESTINATION MARKETING ..........................6
TABLE 2. PROS AND CONS OF CELEBRITY ENDORSEMENT STRATEGY. ................................................... 24

List of figures
FIGURE 1. GILBERT’S DIFFERENTIATION STRATEGY. .................................................................................9
FIGURE 2. MEANING MOVEMENT AND THE ENDORSEMENT PROCESS. .................................................... 32

iii
Acknowledgements

My research interest in celebrity destination endorsement and the efforts leading to


this study have brought me various debts of favour. I am particularly appreciative to
the contacted academics who gave of their time to assist with my requests for
information, as well as for their criticism and interest to the study. Especially, the
insights and remarks of Lynn Langmeyer and Dwane Dean were of great value.

My deliberations on the study have also been influenced by the contributions of


several other researchers, many of whom are cited throughout the text. Furthermore,
I would like to express my gratitude to my supervisor Alan Fyall as he provided
valuable assistance and guidance from the outset of this project.

Finally, I would like to recognize and thank colleagues, researchers and friends at the
Bournemouth University and beyond for providing a stimulating writing environment.

22 August 2004, Bournemouth

Robert van der Veen

Note: ‘I hereby declare that the dissertation submitted is wholly the work of Robert
van der Veen. Any other contributors or sources have either been referenced in a
prescribed manner together with the nature and scope of their contribution’.

iv
Introduction
_____________________________________________________________________

Chapter I Introduction

1.1 Rationale for study

Laws (1995) denotes that destinations are usually promoted by emphasising their
primary and secondary characteristics. The author indicates that primary factors refer
to the destination environment (such as climate, scenery, traditions and the hospitality
of local people), while secondary factors include the destination’s service
infrastructure, e.g. transportation or events. However, in a market which has more
sellers than buyers are these characteristics sufficient in order to get noticed in today’s
communication-saturated society? Morgan et al. (2002a) argue that nowadays most
destinations have superb five-star resorts, hotels and attractions, every country claims
a unique culture and heritage, each place describes itself as having the friendliest
people and the most customer-focused tourism industry and service, and facilities are
no longer differentiators. In addition, Buhalis (2000) suggests that increasingly
consumers are unimpressed by tourism facilities and products, as they have travelled
extensively and have acquired a wealth of experiences. Therefore, the key challenge
for destination marketing agencies today is to create advertising executions to get
noticed in today’s highly cluttered environment. There are a number of ways that
agencies can capture the consumer’s attention and shift attitudes towards the
destination. This study is going to discuss one creative opportunity open to marketers,
which is celebrity endorsement and it will examine the link between destination
marketing and celebrity endorsement. Morgan and Pritchard (2001) suggest that
celebrity endorsement has become a significant element of advertising and film or
sports stars and fashion models tend to be used because they are able to penetrate the
commercial clutter of advertising and arrest consumer attention. The authors refer to
the Wales Tourist Board, which launched in 1994 a campaign that made effective use
of Welsh celebrities, including Anthony Hopkins (actor) and Tom Jones (singer). As a
result, the involvement of these celebrities attracted tremendous media attention
throughout the United Kingdom. In addition, the Western Australian Tourism
Commission secured the services of supermodel and actress Elle McPherson who
embodies the '
personality'of the state and had the ability to take this message to the
world.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 1
Introduction
_____________________________________________________________________
The campaign was launched in 1996 and has provided Western Australia'
s tourism
advertising with high levels of international recall and enquiry1. Middleton and Clarke
(2001) suggest that given the nature of travel and tourism products, the
communication of information is often the single most important (and expensive)
element within co-ordinated destination marketing campaigns. Therefore, it is vital for
destination marketers to be interested in the actual effect of using it. This study
attempts to conceptualize a rationale for why the idea of celebrity endorsement, which
may be considered in any destination marketing strategy selection process in order to
get noticed in today’s highly cluttered environment, could be effective by drawing
together strands from various literature and views from experts in marketing.

1.2 Aim and objectives

The overall aim of this study is to analyse, if celebrity endorsement is an effective


destination marketing tool in order to attract international tourists.

The steps to achieve the aim are formulated into several objectives.

- To gain an understanding into the subject of celebrity endorsement in order to


identify the characteristics and issues concerning the subject.

- To identify attitudes of experts concerning the characteristics and issues of


celebrity endorsement in order to provide new and deeper data.

- To undertake a critical review of destination marketing in order to identify the


characteristics and issues concerning the subject.

- To identify the effectiveness of celebrity endorsement as a destination


marketing tool in order to attract international tourists.

1
http://www.brandwa.com.au/tourism/tourism.asp

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 2
Introduction
_____________________________________________________________________

1.3 Research plan

The study will demonstrate two different methods that were used to gather
information. First, a vast body of literature was reviewed and secondly, various
experts were consulted in order to provide new and deeper data. Regarding the aim
and overall objectives, it has an in particular focus on destination marketing and
celebrity endorsement. The literature review comprised of academic work and other
published sources related to the theories in consumer behaviour, endorsement,
marketing and tourism. The main focus of the primary data is on the views of the
interviewees relating to aspects of celebrity destination endorsement within a
framework of celebrity endorsement in general.

1.4 Structure of dissertation

The intention of this study is, first, to identify for practical celebrity endorsement
purposes the nature of destination marketing and vice versa in order to indicate the
implementation potential of this marketing device to market destinations. Chapter two
begins with an overview of destination marketing, its international dimensions and
main components, drawing attention on persuading international tourists to choose
particular destinations. Working definitions of the subjects are provided, with
comments on the characteristics of destination marketing, and how it differs from any
other product, service or non-profit marketing (Harti-Nielsen 2000). Furthermore, it
identifies marketing as an important instrument that allows the destination marketer to
communicate and emphasize the destination’s value towards the appropriate target
markets in order to maximise destination’s objectives. Celebrity endorsement as
comprehensive communication instrument is introduced in chapter three. This chapter
begins with illustrating the role of advertising in tourism. Furthermore, it will discuss
the characteristics of the endorser in order to transfer the message. In addition,
celebrity endorsement as a strategy and its implications are described. This chapter
covers the major studies that are related to celebrity endorsement and it will illustrate
the importance of getting the ‘right’ celebrity to fit a product.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 3
Introduction
_____________________________________________________________________
Chapter four illustrates the type of research that was being undertaken, the methods
used to collect secondary and primary data, it will provide reasons for adopting the
chosen approach and finally indicates the limitations involved. Chapter five provides
an analysis of the primary data in order to contribute to the literature and give new
and different perspectives. The conclusion and recommendations are introduced in
chapter six. This chapter illustrates the concluded remarks, and proposes
recommendations and finally presents approaches designed for future research.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 4
Literature review
_____________________________________________________________________

Chapter II Destination marketing

2.1 Marketing

This section will illustrate how the role of marketing could be useful in order to
communicate and highlight the destination’s value towards the customer. Furthermore,
working definitions of the topic are provided, with comments on the characteristics of
destination marketing, and how it differs from any other product, service or non-profit
marketing strategy (Harti-Nielsen 2000). According to Vellas and Bécherel (1999), an
intangible experience is offered, not a physical good that can be inspected before it is
bought, and conclude that marketing plays a crucial role in tourism in order to
communicate the destination’s uniqueness with the consumer. In a similar vein,
Middleton and Clarke (2001) suggest that marketing is a subject of vital concern in
travel and tourism because it is the principal management influence that can
communicate and highlight the destination’s value towards the customer. Kotler et al.
(1999: 653) define destination marketing as ‘an integral part of developing and
retaining a particular location’s popularity’. Traditionally, destination marketing treats
the destination like any other product. However, Buhalis (2000) argues that this
approach fails to recognise the unique needs and limitations of each destination as
well as their particular geographical, environmental and socio-cultural characteristics.
Furthermore, Sautter and Leisen (1999) note that destinations are some of the most
difficult entities to manage and market, due to the complexity of the relationships of
local stakeholders. In a similar vein, Buhalis (2000) claims that destinations can not
be managed or marketed as enterprises, due to the dynamics of interests and benefits
sought by stakeholders. Nevertheless, Nielsen et al. (2000) suggest that destinations
can be and are marketed as products, because like international enterprises,
destinations have to operate in competitive international markets and until now, there
are no tools from other disciplines rather than marketing useful in order to enhance
awareness and attention of the destinations’ unique benefits. Table 1 indicates how
marketing research contributes to destination marketing.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 5
Literature review
_____________________________________________________________________

Table 1. Contribution of marketing research to destination marketing

Identification of the main attributes by each market segment


Design and attributes required for tourism products and services
Segmentation of market and development of corresponding marketing mixes
Opening new markets and reducing dependency on existing ones
Reduction of seasonality by matching market segments
Assessment of compatibility with other target markets
Examination of alternative distribution channels
Review of tourism impacts to the destination and selecting the right segments
Evaluation of marketing effectiveness and selection of media for promotion
Review of reasons deterring people (suppressed demand) from visiting
destinations

Source: Adapted from Baker et al. (1994); Calantone and Mazanec (1991) and
Ritchie (1996)

Buhalis (2000) notes that marketing has often been regarded as an enemy of
sustainability, however a comprehensive marketing strategy should enable destination
marketers to identify appropriate target markets and as a result this could ensure
equitable returns-on-resources-utilised for the production and delivery of tourism
products as well as the regeneration of these resources. Thus, marketing can be
considered as a valuable instrument that allows the destination marketer to transfer
information and highlight the destination’s value towards the appropriate target
markets in order to maximise destination’s objectives. The next part is going to focus
on the characterizations and the complexity of the destination.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 6
Literature review
_____________________________________________________________________

2.2 Destination

This section introduces and defines the destination. Furthermore, it will illustrate how
it is recognized as a perceptual concept, which can be interpreted subjectively by
tourists. According to Batchelor (1999), the spectrum of definitions for a destination
is extremely broad. The author explains this that at one end there are compact product
complexes, such as theme parks, resort and holiday villages, and on the other end of
the spectrum, the European Travel Commission (ETC) and the Pacific Area Travel
Association (PATA) consider and market whole continents as destinations. Although
the details of definitions can be debated endlessly, according to Buhalis (2000: 109),
they are best understood as ‘amalgams of individually produced tourism amenities
and services (accommodation, transportation, catering, entertainment, etc.) and a wide
range of public goods’ (landscape, scenery, sea, lakes, socio-cultural surroundings,
atmosphere, etc). Furthermore, the author explains that all these elements are branded
together under the name of the destination. Shoenbachler et al. (1995) suggest that the
consumers are more likely to remember scenery, outdoor activities and special
attractions featured in the advertisements, suggesting that campaigns may want to
focus on these elements. On the other hand, Ward and Russel (1981) along with
Seaton and Bennett (1996) suggest that the meaning of a place is not entirely
determined by the physical properties of that place. Buhalis (2000) suggests that it is
increasingly recognized that a destination can also be a perceptual concept, which can
be interpreted subjectively by consumers depending on their travel itinerary, cultural
backgrounds, purpose of visit, educational level and past experience. Moreover, Chon
(1992) argues that destination marketers should focus on both functional and
symbolic attributes of the destination in tourism product development and promotion.
This brings us to another obstacle of destination marketing, because in most cases
destinations already have a rich history, image and legacy development which need to
be taken into consideration when developing tourism marketing strategies (Buhalis
2000; Vellas and Bécherel l999). Thus, the destination is not entirely determined by
its physical assets, because it can also be interpreted by the perceptions and
associations (both negative and positive) in the consumer’s mind. The next section
will demonstrate the influence of the destination image in the consumer’s decision
process.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 7
Literature review
_____________________________________________________________________

2.3 Destination image

This part will point out how the destination image distinguishes destinations from
each other and which image the destination should pursue. Furthermore, it will
illustrate why the destination image is an important and significant element of
consumer’s decision process. Middleton and Clarke (2001) argue that due to the
inseparable nature of tourism production and delivery, and the intangibility of the
product at the point of purchase, developing and communicating a destination’s image
is a vital consideration in strategic and operational terms. In addition, Tapachai and
Waryszak, (2000) and Coshall (2000) suggest that a destination’s image is all-
important and how a place is represented can inspire people to visit and revisit it.
Moreover, research suggests that the destination image differentiates destinations
from each other and is an integral and influential part of consumer’s decision process
(Baloglu and Brinberg 1997; Laws 1995; Lumsdon 1997). Lurham (1998 in Morgan
et al. 2002a) believes that the choice of destination will help define the identity of the
consumer and in an increasingly homogeneous world, set him or her apart from the
hordes of other tourists. Moreover, Morgan and Pritchard (2002b) suggest that one
should bear in mind that people relate to a destination image depending on their own
individual interests, opinions and experiences. Additionally both studies of Baloglu
and Brinberg (1997) and Chon (1991) put forward that tourists develop a certain
image about the destination as well as a set of expectations based on previous
experience, word of mouth, press reports, advertising, and common beliefs, before
visiting. Dobni and Zinkhan (1990) take the view that image is a perceptual
phenomenon that formed through consumers’ reasoned and emotional interpretation
and it has both cognitive (beliefs) and affective (feelings) components. Zaickowsky’s
(1985) study proposes that the tourist who perceives a low discrepancy between a
destination’s user image and his or her actual self-image or his or her ideal self-image
was most satisfied with the destination. Zaickowsky (1985) explains that when a
decision is considered to be important to a participant’s ego, self-esteem or social or
psychological risk, then a high-involvement state is likely to exist. According to
Assael (1995), a high-involvement choice might include financial risk, emotional risk,
physical risk or social risk. The author suggests that for many people the purchase of
their main annual holiday represents a significant risk on many of these factors.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 8
Literature review
_____________________________________________________________________
Furthermore, Zaickowsky (1985) notes that in high-involvement contexts, a tourist is
likely to seek out the use information about alternative destinations and follow a
comprehensive process of decision-making. On the other hand, Zaickowsky’s (1985)
study indicates that trips that are not important or relevant to tourist’s self esteem,
values, or needs or is perceived to have minimal risk associated with it, then tourists
are less likely to gather information about destination alternatives and are more likely
to use a simple non-comprehensive decision-making processes. The author proposes
that high involvement consumers are likely to respond to information based
advertisements, testimonials and offers of more information. Thus, a certain
destination image could offer the tourists relevant added values, a proposition that is
distinctive from competitors and imparts meaning above and beyond functional
aspects. However, Middleton and Clarke (2001) argue that it is a live asset, it is not a
fixture and its value could depreciate over time if starved of investment and marketing
skill. Moreover, Morgan and Pritchard (2002b) indicate that destinations should
position their brands so that they are perceived by the consumer to occupy a niche in
the marketplace occupied by no other brand, thus, for marketers, the value of a
successful brand lies in its potential to reduce substitutability. Gilbert (1991, 1993)
asserts that destinations can be classified on a continuum between a ‘status’ and a
‘commodity’ area, as illustrated in figure 1.

Figure 1. Gilbert’s differentiation strategy.

Source: Adapted from Gilbert (1990, p. 25).

Gilbert (1991, 1993) suggests that a ‘status area’ could achieve intentional demand as
a result of unique and irreplaceable product attributes perceived by the tourism market.
On the other hand, the author notes that in the ‘commodity status’ case, destinations
are substitutable, very sensitive to price and economic changes, while consumers have
a low awareness of any unique benefits or attributes.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 9
Literature review
_____________________________________________________________________
Both Gilbert (1991, 1993) and Poon (1989, 1993) agree that destinations should aim
to achieve a ‘status area’ or ‘niche’ orientation through differentiation, in order to
improve their image as well as to maximise the benefits for tourism regions. One way
of attempting to achieve the ‘status area’ is through re-positioning of the product,
although it is quite difficult to alter the image of destinations. Buhalis (2000) believes
that destinations may also involve in de-marketing, i.e. charging premium prices that
will discourage certain market segments from visiting the destination during a certain
period. Hence, a clear understanding of the attitudes and decisions of consumers,
concerning to their perceived image of the destination according to their needs and
wants lies at the heart of effective destination marketing. Furthermore, many
destinations will have to scale back their plans in order to focus on the needs of
specific consumer segments, or specialize in a certain form of tourism product. The
next section will have a closer look at the target market.

2.4 Market

This section will illustrate the importance of identifying the needs and wants of the
target market, and how it reflects the image held by potential tourists in the specific
market. This study will have its main focus on international tourism, in order to
follow recent examples of destination marketing campaigns that use celebrity
endorsement to break through the clutter and arresting audience apathy as closely as
possible. International tourists are described as people who travel to and stay in
countries other than their normal country of residence for less than a year (Middleton
and Clarke 2001). On the other hand, one should not neglect or underestimate
domestic tourism, which is described by Middleton and Clarke (2001) as people who
travel and stay overnight within the boundaries of their own country. Robinson (2003)
argues that in developed countries with sizeable populations domestic tourism will be
much larger, in volume and value, than foreign tourism. Nevertheless, the author
acknowledges that most countries seek to increase the number of foreign tourists,
because it is an opportunity to increase their exports of services. Furthermore,
Middleton and Clarke (2001) suggest that international tourists are usually treated by
governments as the most important market sector of tourism because, compared with
domestic tourists, they typically spend more, stay longer at the destination, use more

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 10
Literature review
_____________________________________________________________________
expensive transport and accommodation, and bring in foreign currency which
contributes to a destination country’s international balance of payments. In addition,
the authors suggest that international tourism is also easier to measure than domestic
tourism and such visitors tend to be more recognizable as tourists at destinations. This
study considers international tourists also as consumers, which will be referred to in
this study. McIntosh et al. (1995) take the view that few destinations are universally
acceptable and desired and suggest that the marketing managers should not waste
promotion resources by trying to please all tourists, instead aim the efforts specifically
to the wants and needs of likely prospects. In addition, the authors put forward that
attracting the appropriate target markets could also assist in the reduction of
seasonality, which enables destinations to increase their demand during low season.
Middleton and Clarke (2001) believe that the marketing task is easier if long-run
strategic decisions have created products that match customer needs, and especially if
marketing managers have detailed knowledge of their customers with which to
undertake short-run demand management efficiently. Kotler et al. (1999) propose that
achieving organizational goals depends on determining the needs and wants of the
target market and delivering desired satisfactions more effectively and efficiently than
competitors. On the other hand, Shoenbachler et al. (1995) note that different markets
can have quite different perceptions of a certain destination and suggest that it may be
necessary to target certain regional markets with specialized promotional campaigns,
based on the particular image held by individuals residing in the specific market.
Moreover, March (1994) argues that it is a fallacious assumption to believe that all
Japanese tourists should be treated in the same manner because they come from the
same country. Furthermore, Mill and Morrison (1998) take the view that the
communications strategy of the marketer will vary depending upon where the target
market is in the buying process. In addition, they suggest that joint vacation decision
making rather than individually dominated vacation decision making occurs. Solomon
et al. (1999) suggest that consumer behaviour classifies products on the basis of which
decision process (cognitive, affective, or behavioural) would be primarily operative
during the purchase decision. Mill and Morrison (1998) and Gartner (1989) indicate
that a destination most certainly falls into the affective (hedonic) product category,
because people choose their vacations to yield the most emotional satisfaction (within
the constraints of time and money available).

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 11
Literature review
_____________________________________________________________________
That is, there is no logical reason why some people choose to vacation in the
mountains and some people choose to go to the beach. It is an emotional choice.
Moreover, Kotler (1984: 254) argues that ‘there is no single way to segment a market;
a marketer has to try different segmentation variables, singly and in combination,
hoping to find an insightful way to view the market structure’. In addition, Buhalis
(2000) believes that each destination can only match certain types of demand and
destination marketers need to appreciate travel motivations in order to develop
appropriate offerings and brand destinations for the right target markets. Hence,
effective marketing in competitive conditions is impossible without understanding of
the destination types and characteristics. Moreover, developing a marketing strategy
for destinations will depend on each destination, on the types of target markets and
the consumer’s motivations and decision processes. The next section explains the
scope and extent of destination marketing agencies, evaluating the effectiveness of a
marketing strategy.

2.5 Evaluation

This part will examine the implications for destination marketing organisations to
evaluate the effectiveness of a marketing campaign. Batchelor (1999) suggests
destination marketing agencies of all sorts are responsible to provide the strategic
marketing framework for the destination’s tourism industry. According to Middleton
and Clarke (2001), they serve to co-ordinate the tourism industry as a whole,
recognizing and strengthening industry linkages in the products that destinations
provide, and devising themes and images to integrate promotional efforts. Batchelor
(1999) believes as custodian of the destination’s image the marketing body needs to
evaluate how this is perceived in the marketplace and determine how and by what
means it can be enhanced. Woodside (1990) argues that the effectiveness of
promotional campaigns should be assessed so that the most cost-effective media is
used to approach and persuade target markets to visit the destination. However,
McWilliams and Crompton (1997) denote that compared to traditional retail
businesses, destination marketing organisations are particularly disadvantaged in their
marketing evaluation efforts because they lack the direct sales figures, or single
source date.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 12
Literature review
_____________________________________________________________________
Furthermore, the authors put forward that customers must travel to the destination to
experience the service and the destination may be a long distance from their point of
origin. The writers conclude that these logistics make it more difficult to undertake
studies to evaluate the impact of marketing and consumption that typically occur in
the same geographic locale. Pender (1999) believes it is difficult to isolate the
influence of marketing from other influences such currency, exchange rates and
weather conditions. Furthermore, the author refers to the complexity of tourist
behaviour also means it is difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of one advertisement
or one campaign. Moreover, Mill and Morrison (1998) refer to the heterogeneity of
the product, because services are rarely the same because they involve interactions
between people. In addition, they indicate that a tourism product is a highly perishable
commodity, because production and consumption take place at the same time. Crouch
(1994) explains that the length of haul between the two countries, the nature and
extent of existing cultural and trade ties and levels of awareness or ignorance may all
be important factors.

Faulkner (1997) indicates that many potentially important variables are not available
and/or they are simply not quantifiable, such as many of the variables influencing
tourist’ decisions in general and the attractiveness of the destination in particular are
simply beyond the destination marketing agency’s control. On the other hand, Pender
(1999) suggests that an accurate measurement of effectiveness can be inhibited by the
typically long time delay between the promotional campaign being run and the travel
taking place. According to Evans et al (1995), whatever marketing strategies
destinations ultimately choose, some form of awareness or attention is inevitable if
the destination hopes to survive or grow. Middleton and Clarke (2001) conclude that
achieving it in practice with limited information is both difficult and uncertain but the
rewards to those who achieve even marginal improvements can be great in terms of
marketing efficiency and added profitability.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 13
Literature review
_____________________________________________________________________

2.6 Conclusion

Marketing is a valuable instrument that allows the destination marketer to transfer


information and highlight the destination’s value towards the appropriate target
markets in order to maximise destination’s objectives. In addition, McIntosh et al.
(1995) put forward that attracting the right audience could also assist in the reduction
of seasonality, which enables destinations to increase their demand during low season.
However, one should bear in mind that many variables influence tourist’ decisions
and the attractiveness of the destination. Assael (1995) and Williams (2002) believe
that for many people the purchase of their main annual holiday represents a high-
involvement choice and might include significant risks in the area of financial,
emotional, physical or social factors. Moreover, Faulkner (1997) indicates that many
of those important variables are not available and/or they are simply not quantifiable,
because are simply beyond the destination marketing agency’s control.

On the other hand, Middleton and Clarke (2001) believe that the rewards to those who
achieve even marginal improvements can be great in terms of marketing efficiency
and added profitability. Research indicates that destinations should aim to achieve a
‘status area’ or ‘niche’ orientation in order to reduce substitutability (Morgan and
Pritchard 2002b; Gilbert 1991, 1993; Poon 1989, 1993). Furthermore, the destination
marketer has to ensure that this is brought to the attention and awareness of the
customer. Zaickowsky (1985) proposes that high involvement consumers are likely to
respond to information based advertisements, testimonials and tenders of additional
advice. Moreover, Morgan and Pritchard (2001) put forward that celebrity
endorsement has become a significant element of advertising because they are able to
penetrate the commercial clutter of advertising and arrest consumer’s attention. Can a
well-known spokesperson endorsing the uniqueness of the destination be considered
as an effective destination marketing tool in order to get noticed by the message-
fatigued customer? Chapter three will illustrate the subject of advertising and explore
the characteristics of celebrity endorsement in order to indicate the implementation
potential of this marketing device to market destinations.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 14
Literature review
_____________________________________________________________________

Chapter III Celebrity endorsement

3.1 Advertising

Chapter two looked at what makes destination marketing effective and focused on the
role of marketing in order to communicate and arrest customer’s apathy. This chapter
will introduce celebrity endorsement as comprehensive communication instrument
and will indicate the main characteristics and implications of this marketing device.
Mill and Morrison (1998) state that once the destination has been brought to the
awareness or attention of the tourist, advertising can very influential. This part
presents advertising and Middleton and Clarke (2001) suggest that it is primarily used
to communicate messages designed to influence attitude, feelings and understanding
in target audiences away from the places where tourism products are delivered and
sold. Advertising can be considered as one of the most important and sometimes the
most expensive choices to be made by marketing managers when planning
communications campaigns and expenditure on it requires justification. Hence,
advertising decisions should be based on the results of reliable research in order to
minimise the potential risks. For example, increasing the sales of a competitor’s
products should be avoided at all costs (Pender 1999). Morgan and Pritchard (2001)
take the view that consumers are not passive recipients of advertising, instead they
interact with, respond to and interpret advertising, and they can choose to embrace or
reject its message. Furthermore, the authors believe that advertising needs to break
through not just the media and information clutter, which surrounds today’s consumer,
but it also needs to break through the barriers and filters people erect to protect them
from information overload. The authors conclude that if the advertising is not relevant
then it will never penetrate and any possibilities for interaction will be lost. Chon
(1991) suggests that a destination seems to have the potential for enhancing the traffic
to the country from the target market by emphasizing those attributes, which are
positively perceived in the marketplace in tourism advertisements. Furthermore,
McWilliams and Crompton (1997) propose that a repeated exposure to the messages
may result in gradual learning and ultimately to visitation.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 15
Literature review
_____________________________________________________________________
Shoenbachler et al. (1995) show that tourism advertising attracts the attention of
consumers, awareness and intention to visit the destination can be influenced by
tourism advertising, as measured through advertising recalls. On the other hand,
Anholt (2002) warns in competing for precious moments of the mindshare of today’s
message-fatigued customer, every advertised brand is a threat, and soap powder and
automobiles are as much as a competitor to the small nation or region as directly
competing countries. The author denotes that the Slovenian Tourist Board competes
with Burger King, Toyota and Coca-Cola as much as it competes with the Croatian
Tourist Board. Moreover, the author believes that the real prize is the wealthy
consumer’s rapidly diminishing attention span, a commodity whose price has steadily
and inexorably risen, as brands and their advertising messages have proliferated. On
the other hand, Pollay (1986) takes the view that advertising has a pervasive, intrusive
and persuasive character and is without doubt a formative influence within cultures
and it is designed to attract attention and build positive attitudes to brands, to be
readily intelligible, to change attitudes and to command consumer behaviour.

Belk (1984 in McCracken 1989) suggests that consumers turn to their goods not only
as collections of utility with which to serve functions and satisfy needs, but also as
bundles of meaning with which to fashion who they are and the world in which they
live. Pollay (1986) contends that advertising reflects and exposes existing cultural
values and behaviours, however, not all values are equally appropriate for use in
commercials. In addition, the author believes it happens on a very selective basis,
echoing and reinforcing certain attitudes, behaviours and values far more frequently
than others. McCracken (1989) suggests that the advertiser is the one that determines
which of the values of culture pertain, after carefully analysing the culturally
constituted world for the objects, persons, and contexts that already contain and voice
to these meanings. The author takes the view that a well-crafted advertisement
enables consumers to ‘see’ the cultural meanings contained in the people; objects and
contexts of the advertisement are also contained in the product. Thus, once the
appropriate cultural values are selected, advertising can be an influential device to
transfer cultural meanings to a product.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 16
Literature review
_____________________________________________________________________

3.2 Cultural meaning and the endorser

One frequently used advertising tool to transfer cultural values to a product is


endorsement. Dyer (1988) suggests that endorsers can communicate cultural values
such as feelings, social meanings and values like power, authority, subordination,
sexuality and so on. The author believes some expressions can be read and understood
cross-culturally, but in order to understand fully the function and meaning of affective
displays one needs to refer to a particular context or social situation within a culture.
Because advertisements need to communicate swiftly, clearly and economically, the
consumer is confronted with devices like facial expressions, poses and movement that
tend towards stylization and generalization. Goffman (1979) refers to ‘hyper-
ritualization’, tendencies which contribute towards the stereotyping of people,
activities and situations. Thus, endorsement in advertising can be considered as an
effective marketing device in order to transfer cultural meanings, although it is part of
the cause towards stereotyping of individuals.

3.3 Endorsement as a promotional strategy

In an attempt to communicate the merits of their products or brand, advertisers have


often chosen to use endorsement as a promotional strategy. Friedman and Friedman
(1979) note that endorsers can be of many types, including the typical consumer, the
product class expert and the celebrity. In addition, Daneshvary and Schwer (2000)
point out to endorsements by an association. The study of Friedman et al. (1976)
concludes that it is perhaps useful for a promoter to use an endorser for his product,
rather than employ a comparable advertisement without an endorsement. Furthermore,
the paper indicates that the endorser, no matter what type, effected somewhat higher
taste expectations, intent-to-purchase and believability than the control advertisement,
which was not endorsed. On the other hand, Friedman and Friedman (1979) found
that ads using a celebrity spokesperson led to higher ratings of the ad, attitude toward
the product, and purchase intention for products involving image or taste, and led to
better ad and brand name recall regardless of the product.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 17
Literature review
_____________________________________________________________________
Atkin and Block (1983); Petty et al. (1983) and Ohanian (1991) suggest that celebrity
endorsers produced more positive attitudes towards advertising and greater purchase
intentions than a non-celebrity endorser. On the contrary, Mehta (1994) found that
there were no statistically significant differences in attitudes towards advertising,
brand and intentions to purchase endorsed brand between celebrity and non-celebrity
endorsement situations. However, McCracken (1989) argues that celebrities are
different from the anonymous person, because celebrities deliver meanings of extra
subtlety, depth, and power. The writer puts forward that celebrities offer a range of
personality and lifestyle meanings that the anonymous person cannot provide. The
writer refers to the meaning that the celebrity endorser could give to the product that
was generated in distant movie, music performances or athletic achievements.
Nevertheless, celebrities are still human beings which are in fact highly individualized
and complex bundles of cultural values and meanings. In a similar vein, McCracken
(1989) contends that even the most heavily stereotyped celebrity represents not a
single meaning, but an interconnected set of meanings. The results generally indicate
that a celebrity is more effective than a non-celebrity. However, the effectiveness of
the celebrity endorser depends, partly, upon the meanings he or she brings to the
endorsement process. Hence, celebrity endorsement can be considered as an effective
marketing device to transfer cultural meanings to products.

On the other hand, some of the most difficult aspects of global marketing to grasp are
host countries’ cultural ‘roadblocks’ such as time, space, language, relationships,
power, risk, masculinity, femininity and many others (Mooij 1994; Hofstede 1984).
Then again, Kaikati (1987 in Erdogan 1999) believes that celebrities with world-wide
popularity can help companies break through many such roadblocks. Thus, celebrity
endorsement can be a useful marketing device to enter foreign markets. Furthermore,
research suggests that the type of endorser may interact with the type of product
endorsed and found that celebrity endorsers are more appropriate where products
involve high social and psychological risk (Atkin and Block 1983; Friedman and
Friedman 1979; Kamins 1989; Kamins et al. 1989). In addition, Packard (1991)
believes that celebrity endorsement strategy is effective in selling products, and
services as status symbols since celebrities are individuals of indisputably high status
and in endorsements.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 18
Literature review
_____________________________________________________________________
On the other hand, Callcoat and Phillips (1996) found that consumers are generally
influenced by spokespersons if products are inexpensive, low-involving and few
differences are perceived among available brands. Walker et al. (1992) conclude that
consistency between the endorser’s image and the desired product image may be more
crucial for a technical, complex and information-dependent product than for a non-
technical, simple, commodity-type product. Although academic conclusions are
varied, one can infer that an association must be fashioned between the cultural
meanings of the celebrity’s world and the endorsed product. The next section will
describe the subject of celebrity endorsement in more detail.

3.4 Celebrity endorsement

Celebrity endorsement is a ubiquitous characteristic of modern marketing


(McCracken 1989). Corporations invest significant amounts of money to align
themselves and their products with big name celebrities in the belief that they will (a)
draw attention to the endorsed products/services and (b) transfer image values to these
products/services by virtue of their celebrity profile and engaging attributes (Erdogan
1999; Ohanian 1991; O’Mahony and Meenaghan 1998). Moreover, Newsom et al.
(2000) believe that celebrities can increase recognition and their presence almost
guarantees publicity. Studies findings by Agrawal and Kamakura (1995) and Mathur
et al. (1997) emphasised the effectiveness of use of celebrity endorsement. Because of
their fame, celebrities serve not only to create and maintain attention, but also achieve
high recall rates for marketing communications messages in today’s highly cluttered
environment (Atkin and Block 1983; Erdogan 1999; Friedman and Friedman 1979;
Kamen, et al. 1975; Kamins, et al. 1989; Ohanian 1991; O’Mahony and Meenaghan
1997). Furthermore, Dyer (1988) suggests that the use of a celebrity is one of the most
successful ways of gaining the consumer’s attention and getting him or her to infer the
right message in a limited amount of space and time. Prevailing literature indicates
that, millions of dollars are spent on celebrity endorsers each year (Buck 1993;
Erdogan 1999; Tripp et al. 1994; Walker et al. 1992). Shimp (2000) notes that around
25% of all US-based commercials utilise celebrities, and according to Kamins (1990),
today this advertising approach appears to be on the increase across all media types.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 19
Literature review
_____________________________________________________________________
From a UK perspective one in five marketing communications campaigns featured
celebrities (Erdogan et al. 2001). In terms of monetary value of celebrity
endorsements, Advertising Age (2003) estimated that celebrity income from
endorsements can be substantial, for example, Tiger Woods made in the order of
US$ 70 million in 2002 from endorsements and appearances, Michael Jordan earned
US$ 50 million in the same period from endorsements alone. In addition, Buck (1993)
suggests that dependence on celebrity endorsements has grown. With the significant
amount of money companies invest in celebrity endorsement in order to promote the
company, their products and by creating a certain image, it is vital for the industry to
be interested in the actual effect of brands using celebrity endorsement. However,
who or what is considered to be a celebrity?

The following sections will give a theoretical perspective and starts by proposing a
comprehensive definition about the topic being discussed, McCracken’s (1989)
definition has been used as a basis and is to some extent modified to correspond with
the objectives of this study; ‘any person who enjoys public recognition and who uses
this recognition to endorse a consumer good or service by appearing with it in an
advertisement’. This definition is deliberately broad to encompass not only the usual
movie and television stars, but also individuals from the world of journalism, sport,
politics, business, art and the military. Furthermore, in line with McCracken (1989)
the term ‘celebrity’ is also meant in this study to cover a variety of endorsements,
including those in the explicit mode (‘I endorse this product’), the implicit mode (‘I
use this product’), and the imperative mode (‘You should use this product’), and the
co present mode (i.e., in which the celebrity merely appears with the product’).
Moreover, it includes a range of endorsement roles, such as cases in which the
celebrity is also an expert, is associated with the product in some long term capacity,
or has no special knowledge of, or association with, the product in question (Friedman
et al. 1976).

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 20
Literature review
_____________________________________________________________________

3.5 Celebrity endorsement for the brand

Research indicates when consumers make brand choices about products, including
destinations, they are making lifestyle statements since they are buying into not only
an image but also an emotional relationship (Urde 1999; Williams 2002). According
to de Chernatony (1993: 178), have consumers their own ‘brand wardrobes’ from
which they make selections to communicate, reflect and reinforce associations,
statements and memberships; in effect, ‘consumers enrobe themselves with brands,
partly for what they do, but more for what they help express about their emotions,
personalities and roles’. Clarke (2000) suggests as style and status indicators,
destinations can offer the same consumer benefits as other more highly branded
lifestyle accoutrements such as cars, perfumes, watches and clothes. In addition, the
author indicates that destinations are used to communicate, reflect and reinforce
associations, statements and group memberships and, in the same way, tourists use
their trips as expressive devices to communicate messages about themselves to peers
and observers. Therefore, Schiffman and Kanuk (2004) suggest that brand managers
should differentiate their product by stressing attributes they claim will match their
target markets’ needs more closely than other brands and then they create a product
image consistent with the perceived self-image of the targeted consumer segment. It is
essential for a company to create a brand identity in order for them to build a
relationship with the consumers and also create an image of the product or brand (de
Chernatony 1992; Fill 2002; Kapferer 1997). Newsom et al. (2000) argue that
celebrities can increase recognition, but they cannot rescue a product, and an
inappropriate celebrity, may actually harm it. On the other hand, Erdogan (1999)
suggests that if a product image has been damaged, hiring a popular celebrity is one
potential solution. Walker et al. (1992) suggest that is may be easier to establish a
product image with an initial celebrity endorsement than it is to change a product
image that is already associated with a celebrity or is well-established through some
other means. In a similar vein Dickenson (1996) notes that, celebrity endorsers tended
in particular, to pass on their images to product that had somewhat undefined images.
In other words, companies can hire celebrities who have necessary meanings to
establish new positioning for existing products (Erdogan 1999).

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 21
Literature review
_____________________________________________________________________
In addition, Ratneshwar and Chaiken (1991) put forward that a credible source can be
particularly persuasive when the consumer has not yet learned much about a product
or formed an opinion of it. Reynolds (2000) takes the view that celebrity endorsement
can even give a brand a touch of glamour. On the other hand, if a celebrity’s image
ties in with many brands, impact and identity with each product may lessen since the
relationship between the celebrity and a particular brand is not distinctive (Mowen
and Brown 1981 in Erdogan 1999). Moreover, Tripp et al. (1994) believe it can make
consumers overly aware of the true nature of endorsement, which has less to do with
brand/product attributes, and more to do with generous compensation for the celebrity,
leading consumers to overt cynicism about their motives. Hence, when a brand lacks a
well-defined image it may have one created for it through use of an endorser whose
image reflects the image an advertiser wants for the brand. This is important because
customers may perceive a brand as a representation of what the whole brand or
destination stands for. However, the celebrity should not tie in with too many brands,
because it will lessen his or hers credibility.

3.6 Characteristics of celebrity endorsement

Both Buck (1993) and Tripp et al. (1994) indicate that importance of an exclusive
agreement with the celebrity and the more exclusivity, the bigger the pulling powers
of the star, the greater the risk. In a similar view, Leventhal (1994 in Miller 1994)
suggests that celebrity endorsements are always a high-risk, high-reward situation and
there is always a human element that you never know, and you have to weigh the
potential risks vs. the potential rewards. McCracken (1989) suggests that endorsement
is successful, when the properties of the celebrity are made the properties of the
endorsed product. However, the study by Walker et al. (1992) found that the endorser,
which may have certain attributes that are desirable for endorsing the product, then
again, he or she might also have other, even more closely associated attributes that are
inappropriate for a specific product. The paper indicates that in the selection of a
celebrity endorser, one has to consider not only the product attributes that are to be
established, but also the broader meanings associated with an endorser. Furthermore,
Newsom et al. (2000) take the view that it is vital that any prior promotion campaign
endorsed by a celebrity should not conflict with the preferred image.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 22
Literature review
_____________________________________________________________________
Thus, before implementation, the totality of the celebrity endorser’s symbolic
meaning should be carefully investigated. However, in line with Walker et al. (1992)
investigating the symbolic meanings of the celebrity may be fine in theory but
difficult in practice, due to complex collection of cultural values and meanings a
celebrity can incorporate. Furthermore, Erdogan (1999) suggests that companies have
limited control overt the celebrity’s persona as they have created their own public
persona over the years. The author explains that a linkage is strong in created
spokespersons by the company, as it is unique, whereas the linkage is weak in the
case of celebrity endorsement because of other associations. On the other hand, a
research review may provide a clue to some of the failed endorsements of the past
(Newsom et al. 2000). Hence, it will be significant for the marketing manager to
perform with great analytical skills allowing him or her to decipher information from
several sources prior to selecting the appropriate attributes of the celebrity for the
endorsed product.

3.7 Implications of celebrity endorsement

Sometimes celebrity endorsement can result in negative publicity that has nothing to
do with the product or brand. For example, the celebrity’s private life may make the
news in a way that damages the promotion campaign, such as when the celebrity is
engaging in ‘bad’ behaviours or performance and as a result end the contract. Buck
(1993) claims that celebrities lead lives of unimaginable temptations and awesome
pressures and there is always a vast discrepancy between the images they project and
the live they actually lead. Holloway and Robinson (1995) take the view that there is a
risk with personality based advertising, because when a personality suffers adverse
public relations exposure, the credibility of the advertising suffers too. In addition,
Erdogan’s (1999) study found that negative information about the celebrity endorser
not only influences consumers’ perception of the celebrity, but also the endorsed
product. Buck (1993) denotes that more and more marketing managers have seen their
brand’s reputation threatened by inadequate relationships. The author argues that this
is due to the combination of aggression and inexperience that brand-marketers throw
at endorsement deals nowadays.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 23
Literature review
_____________________________________________________________________
The writer takes the view that celebrity endorsement works for a while, but the energy
and image diverted to the star endorser saps attention from other product attributes
that, in the long haul, count for much more: quality, innovation, convenience and
price. See Table 2 for a summary of the pluses and minuses of linking up with
celebrities.

Table 2. Pros and Cons of Celebrity Endorsement Strategy.


Potential Advantages Potential Hazards Preventive Tactics
Increased attention Overshadow Pre-testing and careful
planning
Image polishing Public controversy Buying insurance and
putting clauses in contracts
Brand introduction Image change and Explaining what is their
overexposure role and putting clause to
restrict endorsements for
other brands
Brand repositioning Image change and loss of Examining what life-cycle
public recognition stage the celebrity is in and
how long this stage is
likely to continue
Underpin global Expensive Selecting celebrities who
campaigns are appropriate for global
target audience, not
because they are ‘hot’ in
all market audiences.
Source: Adapted from Erdogan (1999: p. 295)

Furthermore, research point out to the ‘vampire’ effect, this means that in the non-
endorsed advertisement, receivers focused more on the brand and its features whereas
in the endorsed situation receivers concentrated on the celebrity in advertising
(Holloway and Robinson 1995; Evans 1988; Mehta 1994; Newsom et al. 2000;
Rossiter and Percy 1987). Buck (1993) believes that if a company equates their brand
with a personality to detriment of its other qualities, the brand will rise and fall
according to the appeal of that star.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 24
Literature review
_____________________________________________________________________
According to the author, there are no ‘win-win’ situations in marketing anymore and
claims that celebrity endorsement is the shortest-term strategy of all, because
celebrities, by definition, are perishable, and so is the aftertaste left behind by a
celebrity deal. On the other hand, an interesting alternative that might avoid these
implications is given by Shimp (2000); he suggests using endorsements of celebrities
who are no longer living. According to the author, deceased celebrities are well
known and respected by consumers in the target audiences, to whom they appeal and
best of all, their use in advertising is virtually risk free inasmuch as they cannot
engage in behaviours that will sully their reputations and resonate adversely to brands
they posthumously endorse. Marketing News (1993) gives an example of Marilyn
Monroe and she appeared in an advertisement for the Alaska Visitors Association
saying, “The picture may have changed but her beauty hasn'
t. The same is true of
Alaska”. This study proposed this alternative to the marketing experts and in their
opinion the dead celebrity was not considered to be a good match with a destination,
unless the celebrity was the main reason to visit the destination, e.g. in the case of
Graceland, Elvis'
s home. Another endorsement alternative is given by Dean and
Biswas (2001) and Daneshvary and Schwer (2000) they point out to a third party
endorsement. Daneshvary and Schwer (2000) suggest that consumers are more likely
to adopt behaviour advocated by an association if they identify with the organisation
(identification). Furthermore, if they perceive the source as credible and as an expert
in the products, which it endorses, consumers are likely to purchase the product
(internalization). For example, "The Independent" rated the Norwegian south coast as
the best holiday area in the world in addition "National Geographic" rated the
Norwegian coast as the No.1 tourist target in the world. Furthermore, consumers have
the opportunity to interact with the source (through their travel reports) and there is a
fit or congruency (the match-up hypothesis by Kamins 1989, 1990) between the
source and the product (journalist has actually visited the destination). Thus, a well-
known travel (journalism) association could be considered to be a useful endorsement
device for the promotion of a destination because of their perceived expertise,
neutrality and fame. On the other hand, the marketing experts did not see this
alternative as an effective endorsement device, because the marketing manager is not
able to control the third-party.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 25
Literature review
_____________________________________________________________________
It is apparent that academic findings and opinions are mixed and unable to provide
any direction to marketers. Moreover, when mismatches occur, the implications for
product meaning can be damaging. However, how can one select and maintain the
‘right’ celebrity among many competing alternatives, and, at the same time manage
this marketing device, while avoiding potential risks? The following sections will
describe methods, which may be considered in a celebrity selection process.

3.8 Selecting the ‘right’ celebrity

3.8.1 Performer Q-ratings

As earlier indicated, the selection of the celebrity endorser should be carried out with
great care by the marketing manager. One tool to assist him or her in this selection is
called the "Performer Q-Ratings". Shimp (2000) notes that this selection method is
commercially available from Marketing Evaluations and this firm evaluates
approximately 1,500 public figures by mailing questionnaires to a representative
national panel of individuals. According to Shimp (2000), individuals are asked to
answer two simple questions in these surveys: (1) Have you heard of this person? (2)
If you have, do you rate him/her, poor, fair, good, very good or one of your
favourites? A celebrity’s Q- (quotient) rating is calculated by dividing the percentage
of the total sample rating the celebrity as ‘one of their favourites’ by the percentage of
sample who know the celebrity (Shimp 2000). The author explains this with the
following example, Bill Cosby was known by 95% of the people, of which 45%
considered him a favourite. His Q-rating was 47 (45 divided by 95) Rosanne Barr was
known by 93%, but favourite of only 15%. Her Q-rating was 16. Basically, the Q-
rating reflects a celebrity’s popularity among those who recognise the celebrity
(Solomon et al. 1999). Rossiter and Percy (1987) believe that knowing a celebrity’s
Q-rating may not only be beneficial in cases where particular audiences are targeted,
but it may also enable companies to save on the cost of hiring a big celebrity name
who might not be popular among target audiences. Hence, the Q-rating of celebrities
could be an initial filtering layer in selecting celebrity endorsers.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 26
Literature review
_____________________________________________________________________
Shimp (2000) put forward factors that are considered by advertising executives when
making their celebrity-selection decisions. The author refers to the following major
considerations, in order of decreasing importance are (1) celebrity credibility, (2)
celebrity and audience match up, (3) celebrity and brand match up, (4) celebrity
attractiveness, and (5) miscellaneous considerations. In addition, many scholars have
attempted to construct models addressing these considerations to aid in selecting
celebrity endorsers. Erdogan (1999) identified four models; one of the earliest models
is the (1) Source Credibility Model by Hovland et al. (1953), (2) the Match-up
Hypothesis by Forkan (1980) and Kamins (1989, 1990), (3) the Source Attractiveness
Model by McGuire (1985), and (4) the Meaning Transfer Model by McCracken
(1989). The following part will have a closer look at the considerations and the
associated models.

3.8.2 Celebrity credibility

Source credibility refers to a source’s perceived expertise, objectivity or


trustworthiness (Ratneshwar and Chaiken 1991). Research conducted by social
psychologists over the past 30 years demonstrates that a source perceived as highly
credible is more persuasive than a low credibility sender (Aaker et al. 1992; Erdogan
1999; Hass 1981 in Atkin and Block 1983). This is also reflected in the source
credibility model, which contends that the effectiveness of a message depends on
perceived level of expertise and trustworthiness in an endorser (Dholakia and
Sternthal 1977; Erdogan 1999; Ohanian 1991; Solomon et al.1999). Information from
a credible source (e.g. celebrity) can influence beliefs, opinions, attitudes and/or
behaviour through a process called internalisation, which occurs when receivers
accept a source influence in terms of their personal attitude and value structures
(Erdogan 1999). Further research indicates that if consumers perceive the source as
trustworthy and as an expert in the products, which it endorses, consumers are likely
to purchase the product (Daneshvary and Schwer 2000; Friedman and Friedman 1979;
Goldsmith et al. 2000; Holloway and Robinson 1995; Lafferty and Goldsmith 1999;
Till and Busler 1998).

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 27
Literature review
_____________________________________________________________________
In a similar vein, Ohanian (1991) investigated the relationship of attractiveness,
trustworthiness, and expertise to intention to purchase and found that only the
perceived expertise of a celebrity was a significant factor in generating more
intentions to buy the brand. The author suggests that for a celebrity spokespersons to
be truly effective, they should be knowledgeable, experienced and qualified to talk
about the product. In addition, Till and Busler (1998) showed that an endorser'
s
expertise is more important than physical attractiveness in affecting attitude toward an
endorsed brand. Moreover, Friedman and Friedman (1979), using the internalization
process, suggest that consumers are more likely to purchase complex and/or
expensive products which are endorsed by experts rather than by typical consumers.
Holloway and Robinson (1995) refer to travel writers, who commend on a destination
in the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) programme ‘Holiday’ which are
immensely credible both because of their perceived expertise and objectivity, because
the message is delivered by the BBC itself. Furthermore, Evans (1998) contends that,
someone who is seen to be unconnected with the company and its products, coming
from an impartial and objective source, is likely to be believed. Thus, the
independency and the expertise of the celebrity endorser can be considered more
important than the trustworthiness of the celebrity spokesperson in changing
consumer attitudes. This brings us to another issue, nearly two decades before major
stars were perceived trustworthy, because they did not really work for the
endorsement fee, but were motivated by a genuine affection for the product (Kamen et
al. 1975), however times have changed. As indicated earlier, nowadays celebrities
receive very generous compensations, leading consumers to overt distrust about their
motives. Furthermore, Solomon et al. (1999) refers to the ‘credibility gap’, the lack of
credibility is aggravated by incidences where celebrities endorse products that they do
not really believe in, or in some cases do not use. The author found that the greatest
erosion of confidence was found in young consumers, 64 per cent of whom thought
that celebrities appeared in ads just for the money. On the other hand, Holloway and
Robinson (1995) suggest that trustworthiness can be achieved by using someone
closely associated with the product. Holloway and Robinson (1995) refer to the
example of the Jersey Tourism Committee that used John Nettles of Bergerac (a
television series that took place on Jersey) to promote Jersey as a destination for
holidays, to add trustworthiness to the message since the actor was assumed to ‘know’
the island intimately.
_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 28
Literature review
_____________________________________________________________________
Holloway and Robinson (1995) propose that a permanent link between a destination
and a well-known personality can be of enormous benefit in the promotion of a
destination. Then again, Ohanian (1991) believes it does not really matter whether an
endorser is an expert; all that matters is how the target audience perceives the
endorser. Hence, when the message is delivered by a perceived expert and
independent source it will greatly add to the credibility of the message and it may
influence purchase behaviour. In addition, trustworthiness, which is a component of
credibility, can be achieved by using someone closely associated with the product.
Moreover, when a trustful individual has a well-known personality and a permanent
link with the destination, it can be of enormous benefit in the promotion of a
destination. However, it has been proven that trustworthiness does not influence
purchase behaviour and this is not corresponding to the promotion objectives and
according to Pender (1999), they will often involve changes in mind-set, such as
attitude, opinion and knowledge. Even though the source credibility is an important
factor for marketing managers in selecting endorsers, since expertise has been proved
to have a significant and direct effect on attitudes and behavioural intentions, it is not
the only factor that should be considered in selecting celebrity endorsers. The next
section will describe the importance of match up theory.

3.8.3 Celebrity match up

According to Kamins (1990), there has to be a meaningful relationship, or match up,


between the celebrity, the audience and the product. Furthermore, research points out
that advertising a product via a celebrity who has a relatively high product congruent
image leads to a greater advertiser and celebrity believability relative to an
advertisement with a less congruent product/spokesperson image (Kamins and Gupta
1994 in Erdogan 1999; Kotler 1997). The Product Match-Up Hypothesis, which
maintains that messages conveyed by celebrity image and the product message should
be congruent of effective advertisement (Kamins 1990). An expected fit or
congruency should exist between an association and a product, Basil (1996) illustrates
this with an example, a top model endorsing make-up is good, but a football player
endorsing soap powder less good. In addition, Evans (1988) gives notice that without
a distinct and specific relationship between the celebrity and the product there is the
danger of the ‘vampire effect’.
_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 29
Literature review
_____________________________________________________________________
In addition, there should also be a relationship between the audience and the celebrity,
Basil (1996) also found that identification also plays a significant role in determining
message effects. Research suggests that identification occurs when an individual
adopts an attitude or behaviour from another person when that attitude or behaviour is
associated with a satisfying self-defining relationship with that person (Bandura 1986,
Burke 1950, Kelman 1961 in Basil 1996). It suggests that a spokesperson with whom
the audience identifies insures the greatest likelihood of achieving lasting attitude or
behaviour change. Thus, a consumer who identifies with a famous spokesperson is
more likely to copy behaviours that are represented by the celebrity. Moreover, Basil
(1996) suggests that the greater the identification, the more likely the viewer will see
important attributes in the celebrity. Williams and Qualls (1989 in Basil 1996), for
example, found that black consumers have high levels of identification with black
celebrities.

Additionally, Desphande and Stayman (1994 in Basil 1996) hypothesis confirmed that
the endorser’s ethnic status would affect endorser trustworthiness and as a result
brand attitudes. Moreover, Daneshvary and Schwer (2000) suggest that the
respondents'identification with the endorser and their perception of its credibility will
positively affect purchase intention. Basil (1996) takes the view that when targeting
particular ethnic groups, the ethnic background should be carefully evaluated, because
consumers assess celebrities according to their own cultural meanings. Furthermore,
DeBongo and Harnish (1988 in Solomon et al. 1999) believe consumers who tend to
be sensitive about social acceptance and the opinions of others, for example, are more
persuaded by an attractive source, while those who are more internally orientated are
swayed by a credible, expert source. For example, Daneshvary and Schwer (2000)
refer to individuals with higher levels of education might be less influenced by any
form of advertising than those with less education, because education provides
individuals with analytical skills allowing them to decipher information from several
sources prior to making a purchasing decision, making them less likely to purchase a
product based on one source. From these findings, one can infer that celebrity
endorsement is most effective when consumers have the chance to interrelate with the
celebrity.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 30
Literature review
_____________________________________________________________________
According to Erdogan (1999), the emphasis of product match-up research has been on
the proper match between a celebrity and a product based on celebrity physical
attractiveness. Specifically, the match-up hypothesis predicts that attractive celebrities
are more effective when endorsing products used to enhance one’s attractiveness
(Kahle and Homer 1985; Kamins 1990). The following section will discuss the
celebrity attractiveness factor in more detail.

3.8.4 Celebrity attractiveness

Research point out that consumers tend to form positive stereotypes about attractive
individuals and found that physically attractive communicators are more successful at
changing beliefs (Baker and Churchill 1977) and generating purchase intentions
(Friedman et al. 1976; Kahle and Homer 1985) than their unattractive counterparts.
According to Erdogan (1999), attractiveness does not mean simply physical
attractiveness, but includes any number of attributes that consumers might perceive in
a celebrity endorser: for example, intellectual skill, personality properties, lifestyles,
or athletic prowess. Along with respondents in Kahle and Homer'
s study (1985), they
were more likely to buy an Edge razor after seeing an attractive celebrity in a
magazine advertisement than an unattractive celebrity. However, as indicated earlier
by both Till and Busler (1998) and Ohanian (1991) the endorser'
s expertise is more
important than physical attractiveness in affecting attitude toward an endorsed brand.
Moreover, Shimp (2000) believes that attractiveness alone is subordinate in
importance to credibility and matches up with the audience and brand. Till and Busler
(1998) refer to Michael Jordan (basketball player), who is an attractive endorser, but
his effectiveness is likely to be greater when endorsing products related to his athletic
prowess such as Nike or Gatorade, rather than products that are unrelated to athletic
performance such as WorldCom communications. Johnson and Harrington (1998)
point out that without doubt attractive celebrity endorsers positively improve attitudes
towards advertising and brands, but whether they are able to create purchase
intentions is uncertain. McCracken (1989) suggests that a celebrity brings its own
symbolic meanings to the endorsement process and proposes an alternative model.
The next section will describe this model.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 31
Literature review
_____________________________________________________________________
3.8.5 The Meaning Transfer Model

McCracken (1989) argues that celebrity endorsement, as a marketing strategy has not
inspired especially illuminating theoretical accounts. In a similar vein, DeSarbo and
Harshman (1985 in Erdogan 1999) contend that neither the source- credibility and
attractiveness- nor the match-up theory is adequate in providing appraisal technique
for selecting the appropriate celebrity endorser. According to McCracken (1989), the
models are not capable to grab hold of the success factors of the endorsement process.
Furthermore, the author takes the view that for the source model’s purpose, as long as
the credibility and attractiveness conditions are satisfied, any celebrity should serve as
a persuasive source for any advertising message. Moreover, McCracken (1989)
indicates that the models make assertions only about the credibility and attractiveness
of the message sender and none about the endorser’s role as a message medium. Thus,
the models do not allow marketing managers to understand the appeal of any
particular celebrity and prevent them from identifying the matches and mismatches.
McCracken (1989) suggests using a ‘meaning transfer’ perspective; the attributes of
the celebrity are understood and move from celebrity to consumer good and from
good to consumer. Figure 2 illustrates McCracken’s model of meaning movement
from celebrities to consumers.

Figure 2. Meaning Movement and the Endorsement Process.

Source: Adapted from McCracken (1989: p. 315)

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 32
Literature review
_____________________________________________________________________
3.8.6 Miscellaneous considerations

According to Shimp (2000), advertising executives in selecting celebrities consider


additional factors, such as: (1) how much it will cost to acquire a celebrity’s services,
(2) the likelihood that the celebrity will get into trouble after an endorsement is
established, (3) how difficult or easy he of she is to work with, and (4) how many
others brands the celebrity is endorsing. The majority of studies found that attractive
celebrity endorsers are not able to influence consumer behaviour. On the other hand,
several studies found that celebrities are able to create purchase intentions. In light
with these academic findings it is safe to argue that celebrity endorsement is more
effective than non-celebrity endorsement in generating all desirable outcomes
(attitudes towards advertising, and the endorsed brand and intentions to purchase)
when celebrities whose public personality match with the products and target
audiences, and who have not endorsed products previously. The next section will
illustrate a more detailed literature conclusion.

3.9 Conclusion

In broad terms one can conclude that endorsement does work, consumers do respond
to an endorsement of a product by a celebrity. The fact of associating a product with a
well-known individual acts to increase the positive view of the consumer. The
potential benefits from endorsement for the brand owner are clear, so long as the links
are indisputable and match links in the consumer'
s mind. McCracken (1989) believes
that endorsement is successful, when the properties of the celebrity are made the
properties of the endorsed product. Moreover, as Daneshvary and Schwer (2000)
believe that endorsement is most effective when consumers have the opportunity to
interact with the endorser. In addition, research suggests that simple attractiveness is
insufficient, since an endorser'
s expertise is more important than physical
attractiveness in affecting attitude toward an endorsed brand (Ohanian 1991; Shimp
2000; Till and Busler 1998). Moreover, expertise has been proved to have a
significant and direct effect on attitudes and behavioural intentions.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 33
Literature review
_____________________________________________________________________
However, celebrity endorsement is a high-risk, high-reward strategy and the risks of
celebrity endorsement are well documented. The celebrity may lose their public
appeal or do something that undermines the endorsement, although this study tried to
propose alternatives to avoid the implications, they all were rejected by the experts.
Therefore, both the brand owner and the endorser need to be clear about the
objectives of the endorsement, the risks associated with that endorsement and the
promotional needs of both parties to the deal. On the other hand, nowadays due to
these, sometimes exclusive agreements can lead consumers to overt distrust about
their motives. The main constraint on the effectiveness of endorsement is the extent to
which the customers have the opportunity to interact with the endorser and the degree
to which those consumers see the product advertised as connected to the activities of
that endorser. In addition, if the constraint is mirrored by the largest part of the target
market then one has to question whether endorsement is appropriate. However, the
opposite situation suggests clear benefits from celebrity endorsement. The next
chapter will introduce the research plan for primary data and indicate the limitations
of the study.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 34
Methodology
_____________________________________________________________________

Chapter IV Methodology

4.1 Research plan

Research design is a central component of a study (Chisnall 2001). Therefore, this


chapter illustrates the type of research that was being undertaken, the methods used to
collect secondary and primary data, it will provide reasons for adopting the chosen
approach and finally indicates the limitations involved. First, the research aim is
recalled and the objectives are shown in order to set up the research structure.
Secondly, the structure will demonstrate the different methods used by the researcher
to gather the information while explaining the reasons why they have been chosen.
Finally, the limitations of methods used and general limitations of the research
process are included in order to identify the implications in obtaining and analysing
data. Johns and Lee-Ross (1998) suggest it is often advisable to use more than one
research technique in order to compare findings and obtain a definitive picture of the
subject. Due to time constraints, this study just considered two different approaches,
first a vast body of literature was reviewed and secondly, various experts were
consulted in order to provide stronger and deeper data.

4.2 Aim

The overall aim of this study is to analyse, if celebrity endorsement is an effective


destination marketing tool in order to attract international tourists.

4.2.1 Objectives

The steps to achieve the aim are formulated into several objectives.

- To gain an understanding into the subject of celebrity endorsement in order to


identify the characteristics and issues concerning the subject.

- To identify attitudes of experts concerning the characteristics and issues of


celebrity endorsement in order to provide new and deeper data.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 35
Methodology
_____________________________________________________________________

- To undertake a critical review of destination marketing in order to identify the


characteristics and issues concerning the subject.

- To identify the effectiveness of celebrity endorsement as destination


marketing tool in order to attract international tourists.

4.3 Secondary data

A vital step is the review of previous research on the topic chosen. In fact, an
important part of nearly all research is a review of the literature (Bell 1999; Clark et al.
1998; Finn et al. 2000; Greenfield 1996; Pender 1999; Veal 1997). Brunt (1997)
suggests that secondary data refers to information which already exists and which was
collected for a purpose other than that of the current researcher but which can be used
a second time for a current project. According to Clark et al. (1998), secondary data
can be superior to primary data, as previous researchers could have had different
circumstances to work under, e.g. less constraints concerning time or resources.
Secondary data played an important part for this study and can be considered as the
backbone of the study. Veal (1997) takes the view that if the information that answers
the research questions already exists, it would be a waste of time to collect it again
through primary data. In this case, this was very important issue because the
researcher had only four months to carry out the project. In addition, Hakim (1982 in
Finn et al. 2000) suggests that secondary data allows the researcher to think more
closely about the theoretical aims and substantive issues of the study instead of
spending most of the time thinking about the problems of collecting new data. The
literature review allowed the researcher to see clearly what the key issues of
destination marketing and celebrity endorsement were. Furthermore, the use of
secondary data helped the researcher to establish new relationships between his ideas
that were, at the beginning of the research collection, entirely unforeseen (Dale et al.
1988 in Finn et al. 2000). Moreover, the use of existing sources helped the researcher
to formulate and understand the research problem better (Ghauri et al. 2002).

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 36
Methodology
_____________________________________________________________________
The author suggests that it can provide suitable methods or other data for handling a
particular research problem. In addition, the author also argues that it can provide a
benchmark for comparing with the primary data, so that the latter can be easily
interpreted and understood. The collection of secondary data and their analysis for the
literature review chapter took around 16 weeks, although further research in
secondary sources was carried out during the rest of the period of research. The
literature review comprised of academic work and other published sources related to
the theories in consumer behaviour, endorsement, marketing and tourism. Regarding
the aim and overall objectives it had an in particular focus on destination marketing
and celebrity endorsement. According to Bell (1999), journals are a more rich and up-
to-date source of information than books due to the frequency of publication.
Therefore, the academic journals the most widely used sources and they were
assessed at the Bournemouth University library (UK). The next section will describe
the limitations to secondary data.

4.3.1 Limitations to secondary data

Avoiding errors in research designs is of major importance, as reliability and validity


are fundamental factors that underpin all research papers (Chisnall 2001; Clark et al.
1998; Denscombe 2003; Robson 2002). It should be taken into account that the use of
secondary data might not always be appropriate for a specific research. The
information might have been gathered for a different purpose or in a different context.
For example, most of the existing data were not especially collected for the
effectiveness of celebrity endorsement, concerning hedonic consumption. Veal (1997)
suggests that social science differs from the physical or natural sciences because it
deals with people and their social behaviour, and people are less predictable than non-
human phenomena. Furthermore, the author concludes that, the social world is
constantly changing, so it is rarely possible to reproduce research at different times or
in different places and obtain similar results. Crouch (1994) suggests that the residents
of some nations display a higher sensitivity to tourism promotion that those from
other nations. Crouch (1994) suggests that the promotional sensitivity may depend
also on the destination being promoted and its relationship with the origin country.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 37
Methodology
_____________________________________________________________________
For this reason, one could argue that the studies in celebrity endorsement are not
useful for destination marketing other than in North-America, because the individuals
tested for these studies were all North-American students. Moreover, celebrity
endorsement is the mainstay of North-American advertising (Shimp 2000).
McCracken (1989) and Pollay (1986) both suggest that the relative collapse of
traditional sources of cultural influence that once supplied the meanings, e.g. the
family, the church and school have conspired to give western individuals new
freedom to define matters of gender, class, age, personality and lifestyle. Both Belk
(1984 in McCracken 1989) and Sahlins (1976 in McCracken 1989) take the view that,
modern Western individuals have the right of choice to fill in their own meanings.
Moreover, McCracken (1989) claims that the freedom to choose is now an obligation
to decide and this especially makes the western individual eager towards the symbolic
meanings contained in celebrities and the goods they endorse. In line with McCracken
(1989) celebrities are exemplary figures because they are seen to manage to fill in
their meanings that give them a clear, different and powerful personality that
everyone seeks. According to the author, there is a delicate and thoroughgoing
relationship between the culture, the entertainment industry, and the marketing system
in modern North America. Walters (2004) goes as far to state that Americans are
obsessed with celebrities, by declaring, “Americans would still like to see Paris Hilton
rather than Paris, France”. Basil (1996) suggests that individuals, who are exposed to
media personalities over time, even though this exposure is entirely via the media, are
believed to develop a sense of intimacy and identification with that celebrity. This
phenomenon was described by Horton and Wohl (1956 in Basil 1996) as a parasocial
relationship. Parasocial relationships with media personalities commonly occur
because media audiences think or feel as if they know the media personalities to
which they are exposed (Rubin and McHugh 1987 in Basil 1996). Adams-Price and
Greene (1990 in Basil 1996) found that adolescents did indeed identify with
celebrities. Solomon (1983) indicates that anyone undergoing any sort of role change
or status mobility is especially dependent on the meanings of their possessions.
Furthermore, McCracken (1989) has tried to show the importance of this meaning to
those who are moving from one age category to another. Atkin and Block (1983)
found that only younger subjects rated celebrity-based alcohol advertisements more
favourably than non-celebrity based advertisements; no significant differences were
found for older subjects.
_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 38
Methodology
_____________________________________________________________________
A study by Soley and Reid (1983) indicates that results of advertising experiments,
which use students as subjects should be questioned or at least approached with
extreme caution. Thus, when the studies were conducted among individuals who were
less exposed and less inclined to adopt to the meanings that are made available by the
celebrity’s world, it might provide different results.

4.4 Primary data

Primary data are new data specifically collected in the current research project, where
the researcher is the first user, as opposed to secondary data (Clark et al. 1998;
Jennings 2001; Veal 1997). According to Pender (1999), there are two main types of
research: qualitative and quantitative. Quantitative is the rigorous scientific method,
while qualitative is less rigorous and employs more flexible tools of research (Finn et
al. 2000). For the primary research a qualitative method was used which is an
unstructured form of data collection and it employs descriptions and explanations
rather than quantitative measurement and statistical analysis (Johns and Lee-Ross
1998). A lot of qualitative research is based on the idea that it is better that people
describe and analyse their own experiences and feelings, than if they only answer
questions the researcher thinks are important (Gill and Johnson 2002; Kelly 1999;
Veal 1997). Qualitative techniques allowed the researcher to get rich information of a
small number of subjects (Veal, 1997). The next section will describe the target group
and the way they were selected.

4.4.1 Sampling

The researcher saw it as suitable to use judgmental sampling which is a non-


probability sampling technique wherein the researcher selects the sample based on his
or her judgment about the qualities of the respondent in the sample (Cooper and
Schindler 2003; Zikmund 1999). This type of sampling has the advantage of being
more cost effective and easier to conduct as the researcher has the freedom to
interview those whom are convenient to his sample (Cooper and Schindler 2003).
Modest interest is shown in the literature about the effectiveness of celebrity
endorsement, particular with respect to hedonic consumption.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 39
Methodology
_____________________________________________________________________
Therefore, a specific target audience is chosen based on their knowledge, experience
and involvement with the research area of endorsement in order to generate in-depth
knowledge into the issue. The selected subjects carried out research in an area related
to celebrity endorsement or other form of endorsement and can be considered as
experts. In addition, the majority of the subjects had connections with a University.

4.4.2 Data collection

There are many qualitative research methods, and the most suitable for this particular
research were in-depth questionnaires, because the majority of the subjects are living
overseas. The intension was to find out if the theories were still up to date and the
expert’s view about the topic. A lot of attention was paid to personalising (Barnes
1994) the e-mail and the phrasing of the in depth questions in order to avoid
miscommunication, an example of an email is provided (see appendix I). The
questionnaires were composed of ten open-ended questions in order to allow the
interviewee to express ideas in her/his words (Brunt 1997; Finn et al. 2000; Kane and
O’Reilly-De Brún 2001; Malholtra and Birks 1999). Analysing the results may,
however, prove difficult because the process of scaling has its fundamental
complications (Clark et al. 1998) and so has the comparison of outcomes, as
interviewees answer the questions differently. Nevertheless, the main advantage is
that they are flexible, as a result it allows the interviewee to expand on their answers,
and thus much more interesting information can be obtained (Gordon 1988; Kelly
1999; Patton 1990). The in depth questionnaire was pre-tested and submitted to three
marketing experts, Professor Erdogan, Professor Shimp and Professor Solomon which
have a lot of experience with the topic of celebrity endorsement. According to Johns
and Lee-Ross (1998) and Clark et al. (1998), a pre-test, aims to identify and eliminate
problems before the full questionnaire survey is carried out. It was during the pre-
testing stage that errors were identified in the questionnaire design. As a result, some
badly worded questions were altered and two non relevant questions were removed.
In total, 40 emails were distributed between 20-6-2004 and 28-6-2004 and nine
experts made efforts to reply on the email, give advice and indications for further
research and a list of the recipients is provided (see appendix II) . The response rate
was 22.5 % due primarily to the fact that the e-mails were personalised and the
willingness of the recipients to cooperate.
_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 40
Methodology
_____________________________________________________________________
The questionnaires were particularly valuable during the assessment, because it
captured individual differences and unique variations from one marketing experts’
view to another. Besides these in-depth questionnaires, informal e-mail contact was
maintained with two marketing experts to share thoughts and experience during the
research process. The inspiring remarks and critical comments from both assistant
marketing professor Dean and retired marketing professor Langmeyer have been a
great support through out the study. Obviously, no research project is perfect and
limitations are more or less inevitable. The next section will illustrate the limitations
to primary data.

4.4.3 Limitations to primary data

One has to recognise that unstructured interviews have limitations such as the
possibility of being biased as the interviewer selects questions to investigate and may
inhibit comparability of responses (Finn et al. 2000; Kane and O’ Reilly-De Brún
2001). Moreover, the convenient sampling used for this study is considered to be the
least reliable non-probability sampling technique, because the respondents are not
given zero chance of being randomly selected (Cooper and Schindler 2003). Veal
(1997) denotes that individuals differ in their inclinations to respond depending on
their background, attitudes, culture, social desirability, willingness of subjects to tell
us the researcher what he of she wants to know etc. Furthermore, the author suggests
that individuals can be aware of the research being conducted about them and are not
therefore purely passive subjects; they can react to the results of research and change
their behaviour accordingly. Due to time restrictions of the study it can only focus on
a small target audience. Therefore, this study is restricted in several ways, e.g. it only
focuses on marketing experts that wrote about endorsement in a certain area and time
span in relation to marketing by the only one mean of communication. Besides these
limitations, the personal limitations of the researcher should be also taken into
account. For example, the personal judgement of researcher could be biased by a
systematic tendency towards a lack of objectivity, fairness, or impartiality, which is
often based on personal preferences and inclinations. Furthermore, the study could be
distorted by a systematic error in the assessment instrument and procedures, or in the
interpretation and evaluation process.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 41
Methodology
_____________________________________________________________________

4.5 Conclusion

This chapter has explored the methodological approach to carry out this research
project. It showed the advantages and it offered reasons for the choice of methods
and explained limitations of the research. The results of the studies about celebrity
endorsement should be questioned or at least approached with extreme caution.
However, it allowed the researcher to see clearly what the key issues were and
generated in-depth knowledge into the topic. The characteristics of qualitative and
quantitative methods were presented in order to give reasons for the choice of e-mail
survey in order to gather the primary data. Contact was made via email and the
experts were asked to respond to ten open questions concerning the implications and
the general objectives of celebrity endorsement. However, primary data was restricted
in several ways, e.g. it only focuses on marketing experts that wrote about
endorsement in a certain area and time span in relation to marketing by the only one
mean of communication. This was caused by resource and time restrictions. On the
other hand, the collected data were particularly valuable during the evaluation,
because it captured individual differences and unique variations from one marketing
experts’ view to another. The following chapter will now show the main findings
obtained from the questionnaire

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 42
Findings
_____________________________________________________________________

Chapter V Findings

5.1 Introduction

This chapter illustrates the primary data analysis, which is the process of bringing
order, structure and meaning to a mass of collected data (Robson 2002). Academic
researchers have examined the effects of celebrity endorsement on product image in
the context of manufacturing (Kamins 1990; McCracken 1989; Till and Busler 1998)
but little attention is given concerning hedonic consumption. There is clearly an
opportunity to contribute to the literature and give new and different perspectives. The
questionnaires aimed to explore insight and understanding in particular issues of
celebrity endorsement, which could throw light on the features of destination
marketing. As earlier indicated the comparison of outcomes is difficult, because the
interviewees answered the questions differently. Therefore, this part illustrates an
analysis and broad examination of collected data and one should bear in mind that
every author would not fully subscribe to each part.

5.2 Analysis of primary data

In general, it was suggested that endorsers, no matter what type, generate somewhat
higher expectations, believability than a non-endorsed promotion campaign. However
there was doubt whether it corresponds with the intent to purchase and it is not a
perfect strategy for all situations. Lafferty believes that endorsers are effective in
attracting attention to the ad and add credibility. However, Lafferty notes that the
effects are contextual, because their effectiveness varies by type of product, type of
endorser and the audience. Furthermore, Artz takes the view that the presence of the
endorser may make the credibility of the message more salient. On the other hand,
Artz suggests that a novice, biased endorser can make the message less believable.
Furthermore, Artz denotes that source credibility has the expected effect when the
recipient'
s prior opinion is opposite of the message, but that when the recipient'
s prior
opinion is consistent with the message, a less credible source results in more
favourable attitudes than a more credible source. Artz believes that the low credible
source increases the amount of processing.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 43
Findings
_____________________________________________________________________
Artz concludes that a low credible source delivering a compatible message gets self-
persuasion going, while a high credible source delivering a compatible message is not
really processed and thus the consumer will not engage in reinforcing thoughts.

The majority of the experts take the view that celebrity endorsement is not more
crucial for a technical, complex and information-dependent product than for a non-
technical, simple, commodity-type product. According to Kahle, one major function
of a celebrity is simply to draw attention to the ad. Newell indicates that it seems that
simple commodity goods (in general) would benefit more from celebrities than more
complex products. However, Kahle takes the view that for areas where expertise is
important but lacking in the target market, having an expert celebrity may be
especially helpful. Newell refers to the example of Tiger Woods (golfer) and suggests
he could be a very effective celebrity spokesperson talking about the specific
advantages of a golf club that he endorses. Furthermore, Artz notes that people are
less confident of their own ability to evaluate complex and technical messages and
products. Moreover, Dean believes that celebrity endorsement is more effective for
products that are high in social or psychological risk for the consumer. Then again,
Artz suggests in the high involvement condition, source credibility often have no
effect.

The celebrity who is connected with the product/brand is less objective, because the
spokesperson is seen as a biased source. However, Levy denotes that many celebrities
put forth product lines that do well even if they are not objective. Levy refers to the
Elizabeth Taylor'
s perfumes, which have done well; maybe even better than if she had
merely endorsed Chanel. Levy takes the view that if celebrities are known to be
connected or too connected, they become more like salespeople rather than
enthusiastic fans, and their self-interest may make them suspect. Levy suggests that it
is probably true of all of them to some degree when the public knows they are being
paid for the endorsement. Therefore, Dean argues that the celebrity is more effective
if the public knows that that the celebrity is not compensated for his endorsement.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 44
Findings
_____________________________________________________________________
The experts see the celebrity who is closely associated with the product/brand as less
trustworthy, because they are biased due to the close association. Furthermore, Dean
suggests that if the celebrity is compensated for the endorsement (and most consumers
will assume that to be the case) the public discount the endorsement to some extent,
because they perceive less trust in the communication. Actually, Levy notes it was
seen as the worst case if a celebrity thought to be doing it just for the money and
suspected or known not even to use the product or to have actually panned it. At the
other end, there was general consensus if the close association comes from actual use
and superior knowledge of the product category, then the celebrity endorser is more
trustworthy, due to congruity between the spokesperson and the product.

Generally, the properties of the celebrity should be transferred to the properties of the
endorsed product/brand. Actually, Newell suggests that this is what matching the
brand to the celebrity is all about. Furthermore, Newell takes the view that a new or
non descript brand could pick a celebrity in order to transfer the positive perceptions
of the celebrity to the brand. According to Dean, once the product is linked with a
celebrity, consumers seem to automatically assess the match-up. Levy takes the view
that almost any celebrity can help the consumption of anything, and suggests that milk,
if the celebrity imply it uses it and like it and the public likes them both it could be
effective. However, it could be more effective if the public has a reason to believe that
their consumption of milk has actually contributed to their success, e.g. their skin,
figure or avoidance of osteoporosis. Dean notes that sometimes, the advertiser just
wants to obtain an affect transfer from the celebrity to the endorsed product and refers
to the use of Bill Cosby as an endorser for Jell-O Pudding Pops. Nevertheless, the
majority of experts indicate that the celebrity endorser is most effective when
recognized attributes of the endorser match up with the attributes of the
product. Dean refers to a rugged action movie star like Arnold Schwarzenegger
would be effective in endorsing a rugged Sports Utility Vehicle like the Hummer.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 45
Findings
_____________________________________________________________________
Minimising the attributes of a former celebrity on a product/brand in a new celebrity
endorsement campaign was seen by the majority of experts as a difficult process.
Lafferty suggests that only time can replace one with the other in the minds of the
consumers. Although, Lafferty notes that if the new endorser is considered credible,
the transfer is potentially quicker and easier. Newell takes the view that if the past
association has been positive and the new campaign continues on the same path with
similar celebrities, then minimizing the memories of the last endorser may not be
necessary. On the other hand, Newell contends that if the brand wants to distant itself
from the past endorser (say he or she is thrown in jail) then the brand may want to
deviate in a much more significant way from the campaign of the past, thus, a whole
new strategy needs to be worked out. Artz suggests having an intermediary campaign
focused on attributes and chose a celebrity from a totally different sector and use a
totally different style of advertising.

According to the experts’ view, intensifying the desired celebrity'


s attributes and at
the same time minimising the celebrity'
s attributes that are inappropriate for endorsing
the product/brand lies is the hands of the advertiser, he or she should choose the
celebrity wisely so such a need does not arise. In general, the experts indicate that the
marketer needs to determine which positive attributes fit best with the consumers and
the brand and emphasize them in the advertising and just avoiding the negative traits
of the endorser. Levy and Newell suggest making fun of the negative attribute(s), so
that it is being recognized, but one has to imply that it is not anything serious or not
really true, or appeal to the people who do not mind it. Artz propose a more practical
technique and suggests introducing the celebrity and the symbolic meaning of
background visuals and the context of the advertisement (i.e., advertise during a sport
show to promote sports attributes)

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 46
Findings
_____________________________________________________________________
Minimising the '
vampire effect'
? (the celebrity is remembered, but not the
product/brand) is considered by the experts as a complicated process. In general it is
suggested that the product attributes and brand are not overshadowed by the
celebrity. Levy and Kahle take the view that the main way around it is a good match-
up. Furthermore, Kahle denotes that time and frequency of exposure will cement the
marriage of the two in the minds of the consumer. Artz suggests a more practical
solution and indicates that one has to simply show brand before celebrity. Newell
mentions that advertisers must remember that the purpose of an ad is to sell the
product, so though the celebrity will play a major role in the ad, the ad must have
plenty of product shots, product-dialog, and in general the real star must be the
product.

An association between the cultural values of the celebrity'


s world and the endorsed
product is in general not required in order having a successful transfer of meaning.
Basically, Levy suggests that the public can successfully learn to associate practically
anything with anything else. On the other hand, Kahle takes the view that matching
values can be the most powerful type of endorsement. Lafferty notes that typically
consumers identify with those from their ethnic or cultural background, thus selecting
the appropriate endorser is important. Newell believes that there has to be meaning
transfer, but this meaning may come from the roles they play and the general persona
the spokespersons have created for themselves (real or not). Conversely, Dean
suggests that the cultural values of the world of the receiver of the message are more
important.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 47
Findings
_____________________________________________________________________

5.3 Conclusion

The consulted marketing experts stress the importance to obtain a sympathetic fit
between the product and the personality so that the celebrity can represent the brand’s
values, attributes and qualities. Furthermore, they take the view that for celebrities to
be effective in advertising, their selection must be based on their familiarity to the
market, the nature of their appeal and the credibility of the celebrity in the consumers’
eyes. In addition, the majority note that the celebrity endorser is most effective when
recognized attributes of the endorser match up with the attributes of the product. It
was also believed that this would minimise inappropriate attributes of the endorser
and avoid that product attributes are not overshadowed by the celebrity. Although, the
celebrity was seen as biased due to close connections with the product/brand and
perceived as less trustworthy and less objective. It is proposed that the celebrities will
favourably influence consumer'
s attitudes and behaviours toward the products they
endorse. Furthermore, the experts believe that attitudes and perceptions of products
are enhanced by celebrity endorsers, though not all brands or all celebrities effectively
complement each other.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 48
Conclusion and recommendations
_____________________________________________________________________

Chapter VI Conclusion and recommendations

Commercial businesses use celebrities with target customer segments to increase the
appeal of their offerings. The instrument of celebrity endorsement has nowadays
become a pervasive element in advertising and communication management. The use
of celebrities as spokespeople in advertisements constitutes a significant investment in
intangible assets by the sponsoring organisation, an investment that management
hopes to offset with greater future sales revenues and profits. In turn, marketers are
unlikely to want to link up with stars that are likely to bring their product into
disrepute. Whilst many strategic as well as tactical aspects of celebrity endorsement
effectiveness have come under scrutiny from a manufacturing product marketing
perspective, the concept of celebrity endorsement for hedonic consumption, in
particular destinations is an often overlooked and under-researched strategy. In
addition, most case studies referred to the same celebrities, for example Michael
Jordan is a very popular case, making it more difficult in order to determine factors,
which potentially maximise effectiveness of celebrity endorsers in general.
Effectiveness of celebrity endorsers is found to be moderated by several factors in the
literature, celebrity attractiveness and credibility, product-celebrity match, message
and product type, level of identification, number of endorsements by celebrities, target
receiver characteristics and overall meanings attached to celebrities. In sum, celebrity
endorsement can be considered as an effective marketing instrument in mature and
saturated markets in order to differentiate products from competitors since there is
almost no room for actual product differentiation in markets, as long as the ‘right’
celebrity is found. On the other hand, findings in the literature and primary data are
mixed and inconsistent regarding the ‘right’ celebrity. Nevertheless, it does seem to
be the case, that with products high in psychological or social risk, such as holidays,
celebrity endorsers create greater believability and a more favourable evaluation of
the product and the ad than either non-endorsement, probably because these types of
style products are highly aspirational. Furthermore, securing the ‘right’ celebrity for a
destination is about obtaining a sympathetic fit between the destination and the
personality, in the hope that the repeated association of a destination with a celebrity
will ultimately lead consumers to think the destination possesses the same attractive
qualities as that figure.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 49
Conclusion and recommendations
_____________________________________________________________________
On the other hand, even where there is an ideal ‘fit’ between brand and celebrity, it is
almost impossible to accurately measure the direct impact of endorsement on a
destination brand. Furthermore, there are some other features of destination marketing
that suggest that make choice for celebrity endorsement as a tool to market a
destination less appropriate. First, a destination is often a group decision. For example,
a vacation destination is often a family decision and the destination needs to offer
something for children as well as adults. Basically, the destination needs to offer
something for all the members of the group. The effect of a celebrity would be diluted
in a group decision process, the celebrity has to appeal to each member of the group
and this is the exception rather than the rule. Second, consumer behaviour classifies
products on the basis of which decision process (cognitive, affective, or behavioural)
would be primarily operative during the purchase decision. A vacation destination
product most certainly falls into the affective (hedonic) product category; people
choose their vacations to yield the most emotional satisfaction (within the constraints
of time and money available). That is, there is no logical reason why some people
choose to vacation in the mountains and some people choose to go to the beach,
because it is an emotional choice. Basically, the celebrity does not change the
attributes of the destination. Third, there is an opportunity cost in using celebrity
endorsement since those resources could just as easily be used to advertise the
benefits of the location. The ability of any advertisement to convey information is
limited. If one includes a visual image of the celebrity then there is less time or room
for conveying visuals about the destination itself. The consumer wants to know what
the destination will be like, what they can do there, and how much fun they will have.
It is true that a celebrity may help the ad break through the clutter and get noticed, but
after that the destination has to sell itself, and there is less time or space to do that if
the celebrity is present in the ad. Unless the consumer is a fan of the celebrity and the
purpose of the vacation is to identify with and get closer to a particular celebrity, e.g.
in the case of Graceland, Elvis'
s home, then celebrity endorsement of locations can be
considered as an effective destination marketing tool.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 50
Conclusion and recommendations
_____________________________________________________________________

Recommendations

This study, linked to its character as an exploratory exercise, has several shortcomings,
firstly, no practical understanding of the link between destination marketing and
celebrity endorsement success has been provided. Other impacts variables (e.g.
practitioners’ attitude towards celebrities or issues) have, likewise, been neglected.
Further studies need to include in their research design concerning celebrity
endorsement explicitly the perceptions of the practitioners. Without an understanding
of the perceptions of the practitioners’ activities no more than the (subjective and
possibly naive) interpretations of celebrity endorsers are available to evaluate the
implementation. From a practical destination marketing point of view it is necessary
to understand how celebrity endorsement is integrated prescriptively into a
campaigning process. Furthermore, the majority of research is not directed to the
effectiveness of celebrity endorsement to hedonic consumption. A study comparing
the three types of endorsements (third-party, celebrity, and testimonial from a typical
consumer) for their effectiveness in promoting a travel destination could be an
interesting study. Certainly, there is enormous clutter and the environment is
competitive, however it is those destinations that continuously attempt to match
particularly engaging and relevant appeals to a tightly defined target segment that will
be one step ahead of the competition.

_____________________________________________________________________
M.A. European Tourism Management 51
References

Aaker, D. A., Batra, R. and Myers, J.G. (1992), Advertising management, 4th Ed.
London: Prentice Hall International.
Advertising Age (2003), “Payoff Pitches”, Advertising Age, Vol. 74, No. 43,
27/10/2003, pp. 5-6.
Agrawal, J. and Kamakura, W. A. (1995), “The economic worth of celebrity
endorsers: An event study analysis”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 59, Iss. 3 pp.
56-62.
Anholt, S. (2002), “Nation brands: the value of ‘provenance’ in branding” ”, in:
Morgan, N., Pritchard, A. and Pride, R. editors, (2002), Destination Branding:
Creating the Unique Destination Proposition, Oxford: Butterworth-
Heinemann.
Atkin, C., and Block, M. (1983), “Effectiveness of celebrity endorsers”, Journal of
Advertising Research, 23 (Feb/Mar), pp. 57-61.
Assael, H. (1995), “Consumer behavior and marketing action, 5th Ed., Cincinnati:
South-Western College Publishing.
Baker, K. G, Hozier, G. C. Jr., Rogers, R. D. (1994), “Marketing research theory and
methodology and the tourism industry: A nontechnical discussion”, Journal of
Travel Research, Vol. 32, Iss. 3, pp. 3-7.
Baker, M.J. and Churchill G. A. Jr. (1977), “The impact of physically attractive
models on advertising evaluations”, Journal of Marketing Research, (Nov),
Vol. 14, pp. 538-556.
Baloglu, S. and Brinberg, D. (1997), “Affective images of tourism destinations”,
Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 35, Iss. 4, pp. 11-15.
Barnes, J. (1994), “Close to the customer but is it really a relationship?”, Journal of
Marketing Management, Vol.10, pp. 561-57.
Basil, Michael D. (1996), “Identification as a mediator of celebrity effects”, Journal
of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, Vol. 40I, Iss. 4, pp. 478-496.
Batchelor, R. (1999), “Strategic marketing of tourism destinations”, in: Vellas, F. and
Bécherel, L. Editors, (1999), The international marketing of travel and
tourism: a strategic approach, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Bell, J. (1999), Doing your research project: a guide for first-time researchers in
education and social science, 3rd Ed., Buckingham: Open University Press.
Brunt, P. (1997), Market Research in Travel and Tourism, Oxford: Butterworth-
Heinemann.
Buck, R. (1993), “Celebrity endorsers: rewards and risks”, Brandweek, Sep 13, 34,
37. p. 16.
Buhalis, D. (1999), “Marketing the competitive destination of the future”, Tourism
Management, Vol. 21, Iss. 1, pp. 97-116.
Calantone, R. J. and Mazanec, J. A. (1991), “Marketing management and tourism”,
Annals of Tourism Research, Vol. 18, Iss. 1, pp. 101-119.
Callcoat, M. F. and Phillips, B. J. (1996), “Observations: Elves make good cookies:
creating likable spokes-character advertising”, Journal of Advertising
Research, Vol. 36, Iss. 5, pp. 73-79.
de Chernatony, L. (1993), “Categorising brands: evolutionary processes underpinned
by two key dimensions”, Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 9, Iss. 2, pp.
173-188.
de Chernatony, L. (1992), Creating powerful brands; the strategic route to success in
consumer industry, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Chon, K. S. (1992), “Self-image/destination image congruity”, Annals of Tourism
Research, Vol. 19, Iss. 2, pp. 360-363.
Chon, K.S (1991), “Tourism destination image modification process: Marketing
implications”, Tourism Management, Vol. 12, Iss. 1, pp. 68-72.
Chisnall, P. (2001), Marketing research, 6th Ed., London: McGraw-Hill.
Clarke, J. (2000), “Tourism brands: an exploratory study of the brands box model”,
Journal of Vacation Marketing, Vol. 6 Iss. 4, pp. 329–345.
Clark, M.A., Riley, M. J., Wilkie, E. and Wood, R.C. (1998), Researching and
writing dissertations in hospitality and tourism, London: International
Thomson Business Press.
Cooper, D. R. and Schindler, S. (2003), Business research methods, 8th Int. Ed.,
Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Coshall, J. T. (2000) “Measurement of tourists’ images: the repertory grid approach”
, Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 39, Iss. 1, pp. 85–89.
Crouch, G. I. (1994), “Promotion and demand in international tourism”, Journal of
Travel and Tourism Marketing, Vol. 3, Iss. 3, pp. 109-125.
Daneshvary, R., Schwer, K. (2000), “The association endorsement and consumers'
intention to purchase”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol.17, Iss. 3, pp.
203-211.
Dholakia, R and Sternthal, B. (1977), “Highly credible sources: persuasivefacilitators
or persuasive liabilities?”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 3, Iss. 4, pp.
223-232.
Dean, D.H and Biswas, A. (2001), “Third-party organization endorsement of
products: an advertising cue affecting consumer prepurchase evaluation of
goods and services”, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 30, Iss. 4, pp. 41-57.
Denscombe, M. (2003), The good research guide for small-scale social research
projects, 2nd Ed., Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Dickenson, N. (1996), “Can celebrities ruin a launch?”, Campaign, May 3, p. 24.
Dobni, D. and Zinkhan, M. (1990), “In search of brand image: a foundation analysis”,
Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 17, pp.110-19.
Dyer, G. (1988), Advertising as communication, London: Routledge.
Erdogan, B. Z. (1999), “Celebrity endorsement: a literature review”, Journal of
Marketing Management, Vol. 15, Iss. 4, pp. 291-314.
Erdogan, B. Z., Baker, M. and Tagg, S. (2001) “Selecting celebrity endorsers: the
practitioner's perspective”, Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 41, Iss. 3, pp.
39-49.
Evans, M. R. Fox, J.B. and Johnson, R. B. (1995), “Identifying competitive strategies
for successful tourism destination development”, Journal of Hospitality and
Leisure Marketing, Vol. 3, Iss.1, pp.37-45.
Evans, R. (1988), Production and creativity in advertising, London: Pitman.
Faulkner, B. (1997), “A model for the evaluation of national tourism destination
marketing programs”, Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 35, Iss. 3, pp. 23-32.
Finn, M., Elliott-White, M. and Walton, M. (2000), Tourism and leisure research
methods: data collection, analysis and interpretation, Harlow: Longman.
Fill, C. (2002), Marketing communications contents: contexts, strategies and
applications, 3rd Ed., Harlow: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
Friedman, H., Termini, S. and Washington, R. (1976), “The effectiveness of
advertisements utilizing four types of endorsers”, Journal of Advertising, Vol.
5, Iss 3, pp. 21-24.
Friedman, H. H., Friedman, L. (1979), “Endorser effectiveness by product type”,
Journal of Advertising Research. Oct. Vol. 19, Iss. 5, p. 63.
Gartner, W. C. (1989), “Tourism image: attribute measurement of state tourism
products using multidimensional techniques”, Journal of Travel Research, Vol.
28, (Fall) pp.16-20.
Ghauri, P. N., Gronhang, K. and Kristianslund, I. (2002), Research methods in
business studies: a practical guide, 2nd Ed., Harlow: Financial Times Prentice
Hall.
Gilbert, D. (1991), “An examination of the consumer decision process relate to
tourism”, in: Cooper, C. Editor, (1991), Progress in tourism, recreation and
hospitality management, Vol. 3, London: Belhaven.
Gilbert, D. (1993), “Consumer behaviour and tourism demand”, in: Cooper, C.,
Fletcher, J., Gilbert, D. and Wanhill, S. Editors, (1993), Tourism: Principles
and practice, London: Pitman Publishing, pp. 20–31.
Gill, J. and Johnson, P. (2002), Research methods for managers, 3rd Ed., London:
Sage.
Goffman, E. (1979), Gender advertisements, London: Macmillan.
Goldsmith, R. Lafferty, B. and Newell, S. (2000), “The relative impact of corporate
credibility and celebrity credibility on consumer reaction to advertisements
and brands”, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 29, Iss. 3, pp. 43-54.
Gordon, W. (1988), Qualitative market research, Aldershot: Gower.
Greenfield, T. (1996), Research methods: guidance for postgraduates, London:
Arnold.
Harti-Nielsen, A. (2000), “An emerging new paradigm for tourism destination
marketing”, Tourism Destination Marketing ‘Gaining the Competitive Edge’,
Dublin: Tourism Research Centre, Dublin Institute of Technology, pp. 49-54.
Hofstede, G. (1984), Culture' s consequences: international differences in work-
related values, Cross-cultural research and methodology series, Abridged Ed.
Vol.5, London: Sage.
Holloway, J. and Robinson, C. (1995), Marketing for tourism, 3rd Ed., Harlow:
Longman.
Johnson, R. S. and Harrington, A. (1998), “The Jordan effect”, Fortune, Jun 22,
Vol.137, Iss. 12, pp. 124-132.
Johns, N. and Lee-Ross, D. (1998), Research methods in service industry
management, London: Cassell.
Kahle, L. and Homer, P. (1985), “Physical attractiveness of the celebrity endorser: a
social adaptation perspective”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 11, Iss. 1,
pg. 954-961.
Kamins, M. A. (1990), “An investigation into the ' Match-Up'hypothesis in
celebrity advertising: when beauty may be only skin deep”, Journal of
Advertising, Vol. 19, Iss.1, pg. 4-13.
Kamins, M. A. Brand, M. J., Hoeke, S. A. and Moe, J. C. (1989),“Two-sided versus
one-sided celebrity endorsements: the impact on advertising effectiveness and
credibility”, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 18, Iss. 2, pp. 4-10.
Kamins, M. A. (1989), "Celebrity and non celebrity advertising in a two-sided
context", Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 29, Iss. 3, pp. 34-42.
Kane, E. and O’Reilly-De Brún, M. (2001), Doing your own research, London:
Marion Boyars.
Kapferer, J. (1997), Strategic brand management; creating and sustaining brand
equity long term, 2nd Ed., London: Kogan Page.
Kelly, D.L. (1999), Measurement made accessible: a research approach using
qualitative, quantitative, and quality improvement methods, Thousand Oaks:
Sage.
Kotler, P., Bowen, J., and Makens, J. (1999) Marketing for Hospitality and Tourism,
2nd Ed., Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall Inc.
Kotler, P. (1997), Marketing management: analysis, planning, implementation, and
control, 9th Ed., London: Prentice Hall International.
Kotler, P. (1984), Marketing essentials, London: Prentice-Hall
Lafferty, B.A. and Goldsmith, R.E. (1999), "Corporate credibility' s role in consumers'
attitudes and purchase intentions when a high versus a low credibility endorser
is used in the ad", Journal of Business Research, Vol. 44, Iss. 2, pp. 109-16.
Laws, E. (1995), Tourist Destination Management: Issues, Analysis and Policies.
London: Routledge.
Lumsdon, L. (1997), Tourism Marketing, London: International Thomson Business.
Malholtra, N. and Birks, C. (1999), Marketing research: an applied approach.
(European edition), London: Prentice Hall Inc.
Mathur, L. K., Mathur, I. and Rangan, N. (1997), “The wealth effects associated with
a celebrity endorser: The Michael Jordan phenomenon”, Journal of
Advertising Research, Vol. 37, Iss. 3, pp. 67-73.
March, R. (1994), “Tourism marketing myopia”, Tourism Management, Vol. 15, Iss.
6, pp. 411-415.
McCracken, Grant (1989) “Who is the celebrity endorser? Cultural foundations ofthe
endorsement process”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 16, Iss. 3, pg.
310-320.
McIntosh, R.W., Goeldner, C.R. and Ritchie, J.R.B. (1995), Tourism; Principles,
Practices, Philosophies, New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
McWilliams, E. G. and Crompton, J. L. (1997), “An expanded framework for
measuring the effectiveness of destination advertising”, Tourism Management,
Vol. 18, Iss. 3, pp.127-137.
Mehta, A. (1994), “How advertising response modelling (ARM) can increase ad
effectiveness”, Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 34, Iss. 3, pp. 62-74.
Middleton, V.T.C. and Clarke, J. R. (2001), Marketing in travel and tourism, 3rd Ed.,
Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Mill, R.C. and Morrison, A.M. (1998), The Tourism System: An Introductory Text, 3rd
Ed., London: Prentice Hall Inc.
Miller, C. (1994), “Celebrities hot despite scandals”, Marketing News, Mar 28, 28, 7.
pg. 1.
Mooij, M. de (1994), Advertising worldwide: concepts, theories and practice of
international, multinational and global advertising, 2nd Ed. London: Prentice
Hall.
Morgan, N., Pritchard, A. and Piggott, R. (2002a), “New Zealand, 100% pure. The
creation of a powerful niche destination brand”, Journal of Brand
Management, Vol. 9, Iss. 4/5, pp. 335-354.
Morgan, N. and Pritchard, A. (2002b), “Contextualizing destination branding”, in:
Morgan, N., Pritchard, A. and Pride, R. editors, (2002), Destination Branding:
Creating the Unique Destination Proposition, Oxford: Butterworth-
Heinemann.
Morgan, N. and Pritchard, A. (2001), Advertising in Tourism and Leisure, Oxford:
Butterworth-Heinemann.
Newsom, D., Turk, J. and Kruckeberg, D. (2000), This is PR: the realities of public
relations, 7th Ed., London: Wadsworth.
Nielsen, M., Murnion, P. and Mather, L. (2000), “Destination marketing: market
segmentation and targeting in a competitive environment”, Tourism
destination marketing ‘gaining the competitive edge’, Dublin: Tourism
Research Centre, Dublin Institute of Technology, pp. 75-86.
Ohanian, R. (1991) “The impact of celebrity spokespersons'perceived image on
consumers'intention to purchase”, Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 31,
Iss. 1, pp. 46-52.
O’Mahony, S. and Meenaghan, T. (1998), “The impact of celebrity endorsement on
consumer”, Irish Marketing, 1997/1998, Vol. 10, Iss. 2, pp.15, p. 112/113
Available from: ABI/INFORM Global [accessed on 16/06/2004]
Packard, V. (1991), The hidden persuaders, London: Penguin.
Patton, M. Q. (1990), Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd Ed.,
London: Sage.
Pender, L. (1999), Marketing management for travel and tourism, Cheltenham:
Stanley Thornes.
Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., Schumann, D. (1983), “Central and peripheral routes to
advertising effectiveness: the moderating role of involvement, Journal of
Consumer Research, Vol. 10, Iss. 2, pp. 135-146.
Pollay, R. (1986), “The distorted mirror: reflections on the unintended
consequences of advertising”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 50, Iss. pp. 18-36.
Poon, A., (1989), “Competitive strategies for new tourism”, in: Cooper, C. Editor,
(1989), Progress in tourism recreation and hospitality management, Vol. 3,
London: Belhaven Press, pp. 91–102.
Poon, A. (1993), Tourism, technology and competitive strategies, Oxford: CAB
International.
Ratneshwar, S. and Chaiken, S. (1991), “Comprehension' s role in persuasion: the case
of its moderating effect on the persuasive impact of source cues”, Journal of
consumer research, Vol. 18, Iss. 1, pg. 52-62
Reynolds, E. (2000), Personality' s power, Marketing, Nov 9, Available from:
http://instruct1.cit.cornell.edu/courses/pam323/Readings/Week6/Personality.ht
m [Accessed on 10 January]
Ritchie, B. (1996), “Beacons of light in an expanding universe: An assessment of the
state-of-the-art in tourism marketing/marketing research”, Journal of Travel
and Tourism Marketing, Vol. 5, Iss. 4, pp. 49–84.
Robinson, K. (2003) “Tourism: It' s about managing competitiveness, too” Geneva:
International Trade Forum, Pg. 17.
Robson, C. (2002), Real world research: a resource for social scientists and
practitioner-researchers, 2nd Ed., Oxford: Blackwell.
Rossiter, J. R. and Percy, L. (1987), Advertising and promotion management, London:
McGraw-Hill.
Sautter, E.T. and Leisen, B. (1999), “Managing stakeholders: A tourism planning
model”, Annals of Tourism Research, Vol. 26, Iss. 2, pp. 312–328.
Schiffman, L. G. and Kanuk, L. L. (2004), Consumer Behaviour, 8th Int. Ed., Upper
Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Shoenbachler, D. D., Benedetto, C. A. di, Gordon, G. L. and Kaminski, P. F. (1995),
“Destination advertising: assessing effectiveness with the split-run technique”,
Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, Vol. 4, Iss. 2, pp.1-21.
Shimp, T. E. (2000), Advertising, promotion and supplemental aspects of integrated
marketing communications, 5th Ed., Fort Worth: Dryden Press.
Seaton, A.V. and Bennett, M. M. (1996), Marketing Tourism Products: Concepts,
Issues and Cases, London: International Thomson Business Press.
Soley, L.C. and Reid, L. N. (1983), “On the validity of students as subjects in
advertising experiments”, Journal of advertising research, Vol. 23, Iss. 4, pp.
57-59.
Solomon, M. (1983), “The role of products as social stimuli: a symbolic
interactionism perspective”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 10, Iss. 3, pp.
319.
Solomon, M. R., Bamossy, G. Askegaard, S. (1999) Consumer behaviour: a
European perspective, Harlow: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
Tapachai, N. and Waryszak, R. (2000), “An examination of the role of beneficial
image in tourist destination selection”, Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 39,
Iss. 1, pp. 37–44.
Till, B.D. and Busler, M. (1998), "Matching products with endorsers: attractiveness
versus expertise", Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 15 No. 6, pp. 576-86.
Tripp, C., Jensen, T., Carlson, L. (1994), “The effects of multiple product
endorsements by celebrities”, Journal of Consumer Research, Mar, 20, 4, pg.
535.
Urde, M. (1999), “Brand orientation: a mindset for building brands into strategic
resources”, Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 15, Iss.3, 117-133.
Veal, A. J. (1997), Research methods for leisure and tourism: a practical guide, 2nd
Ed., London: Pitman.
Walker, M., Langmeyer, L., Langmeyer, D. (1992), “Celebrity endorsers: do you get
what you pay for?” The Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 9, Iss. 2, pg. 69
Walters, B. (2004), “America’s obsession with celebrities” Newsweek, July 12,
Periscope, pg. 6.
Ward, L. M. and Russel, J. A. (1981), “The psychological representation of Molar
physical environments”, Journal of experimental psychology, Vol. 110, Iss. 2,
pp.121-52.
Williams, A. (2002), Understanding the Hospitality Consumer: Hospitality, Leisure,
and Tourism Series, Oxford: MA Butterworth-Heinemann.
Woodside, A.G. (1990), “Measuring advertising effectiveness in destination
marketing strategies”, Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 29, Iss. 2, pp. 3–8.
Zaickowsky, J. L. (1985), “Measuring the involvement construct”, Journal of
consumer research, Vol. 12, pp. 341-352.
Zikmund, W. G. (1999), Essentials of marketing research, Fort Worth: Dryden Press.
Appendices
Appendix I
Example of the e-mail with the in depth questions
Dear Dr. Tagg,

After reading your article ‘Selecting celebrity endorsers: The practitioner's


perspective, in the Journal of Advertising Research, 2001 I got interested in the
concept of celebrity endorsement and made it my dissertation topic. My name is
Robert van der Veen and I am a M.A. tourism student at the Bournemouth University.
My aim is trying to find out the critical success factors of celebrity endorsement for
the promotion of tourism destinations brands. My literature review is almost complete,
but I still have some questions concerning celebrity endorsement in general.
Considering your impressive experience in marketing, I would appreciate it very
much if you could have a look at them or give me a certain indication towards further
research. Many thanks in advance.

Kind regards,

Robert van der Veen

European Tourism Management

Questions;

1. Do endorsers, no matter what type, generate somewhat higher expectations,


intent-to-purchase and believability than a non-endorsed promotion campaign?

2. Is celebrity endorsement more crucial for a technical, complex and


information-dependent product than for a non-technical, simple, commodity-
type product?

3. Is a celebrity who is not connected with the product/brand more objective?

4. On the other hand, is a celebrity who is closely associated with the


product/brand more trustworthy?

5. Is a celebrity who is (or perceived) as an expert on the subject more credible?

6. Should the properties of the celebrity be transferred to the properties of the


endorsed product/brand?

7. How can you minimise the attributes of a former celebrity on a product/brand


in a new celebrity endorsement campaign?

8. How can you intensify the desired celebrity’s attributes and at the same time
minimise the celebrity’s attributes that are inappropriate for endorsing the
product/brand?

9. How can you minimise the ‘vampire effect’? (celebrity is remembered, but not
the product/brand)

10. Is an association between the cultural values of the celebrity'


s world and the
endorsed product required in order to have a successful transfer of meaning?
Appendix II
Responses to the e-mail
Artz, Nancy
Associate Professor of Business Administration
University of Southern Maine
Tel: 207-780-4321
E-mail: artz@usm.maine.edu

Thank you for letting me know that my research has influenced someone! My
research has moved on to other topics and given the length of time it takes to get
things published, it has been YEARS since I' ve thought by source issues. I doubt I
can be of much use to you. I' ll take a stab at answering some questions using my
intuition, but I hope you get answers from someone who remembers the literature!

Best wishes in your research

Nancy

1. Do endorsers, no matter what type, generate somewhat higher expectations,


intent-to-purchase and believability than a non-endorsed promotion campaign?
I predict it can work both ways. The presence of the endorser MAY make the
credibility/validity of the message more salient. So an expert, trustworthy endorser
would make the message more believable. A novice, biased endorser can make the
message LESS believable. This may or may not correspond with intent to
purchase. More importantly, one study showed that source credibility has the
expected effect when the recipient' s prior opinion is opposite of the message, but that
when the recipient' s prior opinion is consistent with the message, a LESS credible
source results in more favourable attitudes than a more credible source. (Of course I
forget the authors of the study and the explanation * I think it is that the low credible
source increases the amount of processing, so a low credible source delivering a
compatible message gets self-persuasion going, while a high credible source
delivering a compatible message is not really processed and thus you don' t engage in
reinforcing thoughts).

2. Is celebrity endorsement more crucial for a technical, complex and information-


dependent product than for a non-technical, simple, commodity-type product?
YES, assuming you have an expert, unbiased source. My prediction is that people are
less confident of their own ability to evaluate complex/tech messages &
products. Sort of like the difference between search attributes and experience and
credence attributes. Endorsers will have greater effect with the latter two.

3. Is a celebrity who is not connected with the product/brand more objective?


I'
m not sure how this differs from bias or self-interest. An unbiased source is more
objective.

4. Is a celebrity who is closely associated with the product/brand more


trustworthy? If the close association is from being a paid endorser, they are more
biased. If the close association comes from actual use and superior knowledge of the
product category (expertise), then they are more trustworthy.

5. Is a celebrity who is (or perceived) as an expert on the subject more credible?


YES, if not overwhelmed by self-interest.
6. Should the properties of the celebrity be transferred to the properties of the
endorsed product/brand? Yes

7. How can you minimise the attributes of a former celebrity on a product/brand in


a new celebrity endorsement campaign? Have an intermediary campaign focused on
attributes & chose a celebrity from a totally different sector & use a totally different
style of advertising.

8. How can you intensify the desired celebrity' s attributes and at the same time
minimise the celebrity'
s attributes that are inappropriate for endorsing the
product/brand? Your introduction of celebrity and the symbolic meaning of
background visuals and the context of the advertisement (i.e., advertise during a sport
show to promote sports attributes)

9. How can you minimise the ' vampire effect'


? (celebrity is remembered, but not
the product/brand) Repetition of brand name is visual & sound. Show brand before
show celebrity.

10. Is an association between the cultural values of the celebrity' s world and the
endorsed product required in order to have a successful transfer of meaning? Why
isn'
t cultural value one attribute that may or may not transfer, just like another
celebrity attribute? [Just as you imply in question 8]

there'
s my intuition. Of course, I am reminded of the research study that showed that
academics had worse intuition about marketing effects than marketing practitioners
and students!

Good luck
Nancy
Dwane, Hal Dean
Assistant Professor
Department of Marketing
College of Business
East Carolina University
Tel: (252) 328-6603
E-mail: deand@mail.ecu.edu

Robert,

I apologize for taking so long to respond to your e-mail, but I am teaching this
summer and there just has not been enough time until now. My 2001 JA article that
you cite was more about endorsements by third-party organizations than celebrities. I
included the latter condition as a factor level, but only because I needed a contrast to
endorsement by third party organizations. My knowledge of celebrity endorsements
is limited, but I will answer your questions as best I can. You mention that your aim is
to "find out the critical success factors of celebrity endorsement for the promotion of
tourism destinations." I see a potential problem with this general premise. Celebrity
endorsements are believed to persuade through the process of identification (Friedman
and Friedman, 1979). This idea proposes that consumers like what the celebrity
represents, and it suggests that they may try to emulate the celebrity and/or follow his
advice on appearance, style, and manner. The endorsed product is seen as a means by
which the consumer may more closely approach the image of the celebrity. Thus,
products that affect the appearance, reputation, sense of style, or image of consumers
would be good candidates for endorsement by celebrities. Certainly, we see that
celebrity endorsements for products such as cosmetics, hair care products, exercise
equipment, clothing, jewellery, cologne, and stylish automobiles seem to be
successful.

I don't mean to imply that celebrity endorsements are limited to those products
mentioned above. Sometimes, the advertiser just wants to obtain an affect transfer
from the celebrity to the endorsed product. Using Bill Cosby as an endorser for Jell-O
Pudding Pops was an example of this. But the celebrity endorser is most effective
when recognized attributes of the endorser match up with the attributes of the
product. So, a rugged action movie star like Arnold Schwarzenegger would be
effective in endorsing a rugged SUV like the Hummer. A fashion model/actress like
Molly Sims would be effective endorsing a hair care product. These are good
matches between product and endorser. As a product, a vacation destination is
purchased mostly for the emotional pleasure it will bring to the consumer. Since
people are very individualistic in what brings them pleasure, I think that celebrity
endorsement of a vacation destination may not be effective. Perhaps if the destination
were promoted as the most socially appropriate spot to visit for people who identified
with the celebrity, then the endorsement might work. I think Dolly Parton endorses
here own theme park near Branson, Missouri.
Many people pilgrimage to Graceland mansion in Memphis because they identify
with Elvis Presley. I think probably the best example of celebrity endorsement of a
vacation would be the promotion by the Caribbean cruise line that touted a fun-filled
cruise with actual NASCAR drivers. For fans that identify with the drivers, such a
vacation would seem like a dream come true.
However, in general, I am sceptical that celebrity endorsement of a tourist destination
would be particularly effective. Unless the destination is linked in some way to the
life of the celebrity, I don'
t see people eager to travel to the destination. Even then, the
main attraction would be for avid fans of the celebrity; the celebrity would have to
have a very wide following.

Moving on to your questions:

1. Do endorsers, no matter what type, generate somewhat higher


expectations, intent-to-purchase and believability than a non-endorsed promotion
campaign? Endorsers are effective, but their effectiveness varies by type of product
and type of endorser. This interaction is detailed in Friedman and Friedman (1979);
see the list of references in my paper.

2. Is celebrity endorsement more crucial for a technical, complex and information-


dependent product than for a non-technical, simple, commodity-type product?
Celebrity endorsement is most effective for products that are high in social or
psychological risk for the consumer. Expert endorsers are better suited for technical
products.

3. Is a celebrity who is not connected with the product/brand more objective?


If you mean by not connected that the celebrity is not compensated for his
endorsement, then yes, the celebrity is more effective if the public knows that he
endorsed the product for free.

4. Is a celebrity who is closely associated with the product/brand more


trustworthy? If the celebrity is compensated for the endorsement (and most
consumers will assume that to be the case) they discount the endorsement to some
extent. That is, they perceive less trust in the communication.

5. Is a celebrity who is (or perceived) as an expert on the subject more credible?


Yes. For example, Molly Sims is celebrity but she could also be an expert for hair
care products in the sense that her success depends on knowing about hair care.

6. Should the properties of the celebrity be transferred to the


properties of the endorsed product/brand? Once the product is linked with a celebrity,
consumers seem to automatically assess the match-up. If the product is congruent
with the attributes of the celebrity, then the endorsement will be more effective.

7. How can you minimise the attributes of a former celebrity on a product/brand in


a new celebrity endorsement campaign? If you are obtaining a new celebrity for the
same product, and assuming there was a match between the old celebrity and the
product, then the same attributes are in play. I don'
t think they can be minimized.
8. How can you intensify the desired celebrity' s attributes and at the same time
minimise the celebrity'
s attributes that are inappropriate for endorsing the
product/brand? The advertiser should choose their celebrity wisely so such a need
does not arise.

9. How can you minimise the ' vampire effect'


? (celebrity is remembered, but not
the product/brand) A good choice of brand name and brand building will help.
Mostly, I think the ad agency will have to produce the ad in such a way that the
product attributes and brand are not overshadowed by the celebrity.

10. Is an association between the cultural values of the celebrity' s world and the
endorsed product required in order to have a successful transfer of meaning?
I think the cultural values of the world of the receiver of the message are more
important.

I hope my responses are of some help.

Best Wishes,
Goldsmith, Ron
Doctoral Advisor
Marketing Department College of Business Tallahassee
Florida State University
Phone: (850)644-4401
E-mail: rgoldsm@garnet.acns.fsu.edu

Dear Robert, forgive me for not replying promptly to your query. You have posed a
truly provocative set of questions re: celebrity endorsements. I always teach my CB
students that using celebrities is a "high risk/high payoff" strategy. I would be most
interested to learn of your findings and conclusions, so please share them with me
when they develop.

Questions;

1. Do endorsers, no matter what type, generate somewhat higher expectations,


intent-to-purchase and believability than a non-endorsed promotion campaign?
Consider that fact that the choice of the specific endorser may have more impact than
using one or not (i.e., which endorser may be important) and the fact that any endorser
at all may have only a very small impact, and you may be looking at teasing out a
very small influence. I would first determine how much of an influence such an
endorser would have to see if this is worth examining from both theoretical and
practical points of view.

2. Is celebrity endorsement more crucial for a technical, complex and information-


dependent product than for a non-technical, simple, commodity-type product?
I think the issue is partially confounded by the fact that celebrities are sometimes
experts for specific product fields, but that their expertise is inseparable from their
fame and attractiveness.

3. Is a celebrity who is not connected with the product/brand more objective?


There is some research that indicates that cues like celebrity are more effective when
the receiver processes the message in a shallow, non-deliberate way. If the processing
is thoughtful then such cues may be dismissed. There is an article in New
York Times Advertising column today (Friday) about celebrities that may
interest you.

4. Is a celebrity who is closely associated with the product/brand more


trustworthy? If the celebrity uses the product (Nike Air Jordan) why shouldn' t he be
trustworthy? Although, sometimes the celebrity is thought to be doing it just for the
money.

5. Is a celebrity who is (or perceived) as an expert on the subject more credible?


Yes, Michael Jordan is an example when he endorsed shoes.

6. Should the properties of the celebrity be transferred to the properties of the


endorsed product/brand? There has to be a match-up between the brand and the
celebrity. For example, Jordan and Nike is a good match-up.
7. How can you minimise the attributes of a former celebrity on a product/brand in
a new celebrity endorsement campaign? I don’t think they can be minimised

8. How can you intensify the desired celebrity' s attributes and at the same time
minimise the celebrity'
s attributes that are inappropriate for endorsing the
product/brand? Carefully choose your celebrity

9. How can you minimise the 'vampire effect'


? (celebrity is remembered, but not
the product/brand) This can be a serious problem, remember that the purpose of an ad
is to sell the product.

10. Is an association between the cultural values of the celebrity'


s world and the
endorsed product required in order to have a successful transfer of meaning? Not
necessarily, but there has to be a transfer of meaning.

HTH, Ron
Kahle, Lynn
Professor of marketing
Charles H. Lundquist College of Business.
University of Oregon
Tel: (541) 346-3373
E-mail: lkahle@oregon.uoregon.edu

1. Do endorsers, no matter what type, generate somewhat higher expectations,


intent-to-purchase and believability than a non-endorsed promotion campaign? On
average, but not in all individual cases.

2. Is celebrity endorsement more crucial for a technical, complex and information-


dependent product than for a non-technical, simple, commodity-type product? No,
since one major function of a celebrity is simply to draw attention to the ad. For areas
where expertise is important but lacking in the target market, having an expert
celebrity may be especially helpful.

3. Is a celebrity who is not connected with the product/brand more objective? Not
necessarily

4. Is a celebrity who is closely associated with the product/brand more


trustworthy? Not necessarily. This answer, by the way, is based on data, not
common sense.

5. Is a celebrity who is (or perceived) as an expert on the subject more credible?


On average, yes.

6. Should the properties of the celebrity be transferred to the properties of the


endorsed product/brand? Many effective uses of endorsers take advantage of a
match-up between brand and celebrity where the celebrity communicates via the
match-up.

7. How can you minimise the attributes of a former celebrity on a product/brand in


a new celebrity endorsement campaign? People forget quickly, assuming that you do
want them to forget. Merely putting the new celebrity out in public will increase the
visibility.

8. How can you intensify the desired celebrity' s attributes and at the same time
minimise the celebrity'
s attributes that are inappropriate for endorsing the
product/brand? By stating the desired attributes explicitly.

9. How can you minimise the ' vampire effect'


? (celebrity is remembered, but not the
product/brand) Again, a good match-up should help people remember the association,
not just the celebrity.

10. Is an association between the cultural values of the celebrity'


s world and the
endorsed product required in order to have a successful transfer of meaning? No, but
it can help. Matching values can be the most powerful type of endorsement.
Lafferty, Barbara A.
Assistant Professor
Department of Marketing
College of Business Administration
University of South Florida
Tel: 813-974-5998
E-mail: lafferty@coba.usf.edu

1. Do endorsers, no matter what type, generate somewhat higher expectations,


intent-to-purchase and believability than a non-endorsed promotion campaign?
In general, yes. Typically, they attract attention to the ad and add credibility. But the
effects are contextual. In other words, it can depend on various factors. There has
been a lot of research on when endorsers matter more. If the product is low
involvement, endorsers take on more importance. If the product is related to looks
such as beauty products, the attractiveness of the endorser has a greater affect. I'd
research the literature on this for more empirical data.

2. Is celebrity endorsement more crucial for a technical, complex and information-


dependent product than for a non-technical, simple, commodity-type product?
Again, it depends. Typically, if the product is complex, the content of the ad takes on
greater importance than who the spokesperson is. If the knowledge of the consumers
is low for that product, then the endorser can be more influential. Again, check the
literature for more on this.

3. Is a celebrity who is not connected with the product/brand more objective?


I'
m not sure what you mean by connected.

4. Is a celebrity who is closely associated with the product/brand more


trustworthy? I assume you mean if there is a congruity between the spokesperson and
the product such as Tiger Woods promoting golf clubs. If so, then the general
consensus is yes.

5. Is a celebrity who is (or perceived) as an expert on the subject more credible?


Yes.

6. Should the properties of the celebrity be transferred to the properties of the


endorsed product/brand? I don' t know if "should" is appropriate. Do the properties
transfer, the expectation is yes. If the endorser is considered credible then this halo is
anticipated to encompass the product.

7. How can you minimise the attributes of a former celebrity on a product/brand in


a new celebrity endorsement campaign? If you are switching endorsers and getting a
new spokesperson, only time can replace one with the other in the minds of the
consumers. Again, if the endorser is considered credible, the transfer is potentially
quicker and easier.

8. How can you intensify the desired celebrity' s attributes and at the same time
minimise the celebrity'
s attributes that are inappropriate for endorsing the
product/brand? Mostly by careful selection of the endorser.
9. How can you minimise the 'vampire effect'
? (Celebrity is remembered, but not
the product/brand) A common problem. This is an issue for creative strategy in
campaigns. Often the product category is connected to the celebrity but not the brand
name. Generally, time and frequency of exposure will cement the marriage of the 2 in
the minds of the consumer.

10. Is an association between the cultural values of the celebrity' s world and the
endorsed product required in order to have a successful transfer of meaning?
I think under certain circumstances this might be true. But I' m not sure if you mean
the cultural values of the specific spokesperson or of celebrities and Hollywood in
general. Not as much is done on cultural. But typically consumers identify with
those from their ethnic or cultural background so if you're trying to attract this group,
selecting the appropriate endorser is important.
Langmeyer, Lynn
Professor Emeritus of Marketing
E-mail: langmeyer@nku.edu

My husband (also Dr. Langmeyer, actually there are four of us) forwarded your
message to me. We just returned from 2 weeks in California. I must tell you that I
retired a bit more than four years ago and have thought very little about celebrity
endorsers since then. I am not up-to-date on what is being done now.

1. Do endorsers, no matter what type, generate somewhat higher expectations,


intent-to-purchase and believability than a non-endorsed promotion campaign?
As the paper with Walker suggests, a product that has no image may be more affected
by a pairing with a celebrity endorser than a product that has an established image
(e.g., bath towels vs. jeans). To change a product image, (whether toothpaste, chewing
gum, clothing, universities) is extremely difficult, whether or not one uses a celebrity
endorser. Celebrity advertising would probably cut through the clutter, particularly on
TV. After a while, however, the novelty would wear off. And if your target market
were, say 18-35 or 40 year olds, the celebrity or celebrities would have to be carefully
selected. For instance, my 33-year old daughter is not familiar with many of the
celebrities I still adore. If I were doing the research, I would first do some preliminary
pilot testing to determine if the intended audience recognizes the celebrity you are
considering for use in the actual study.

2. Is celebrity endorsement more crucial for a technical, complex and information-


dependent product than for a non-technical, simple, commodity-type product?
See Ohanian, (I think I spelled that correctly) "The Impact of Celebrity
Spokesperson' s Perceived Image on Consumers'Intention to Purchase," Journal of
Advertising Research, Feb-March 1991, for an expertise, attractiveness,
trustworthiness (credibility), study using celebrity endorsers. Perhaps you already
have read it.”

3. Is a celebrity who is not connected with the product/brand more objective?


Linked to conditions of what?
The fact that a celebrity receives "generous compensation" can create cynicism
especially if it turns out that the endorser has never used the product. I
cannot remember who the celebrity was however there was a celebrity who was
an endorser for the Beef Association of America and it turned out she was a
vegetarian. Marketers do not like those kinds of things to happen.

4. Is a celebrity who is closely associated with the product/brand more trustworthy?


There is an article by Braig, Bronson, and Tybout, "Popularity, Product Relevance,
and the Effectiveness of Celebrity Spokespeople." I have an abstract not the actual
article. I think it was published in a proceedings. The abstract states, "...expert or
trustworthy celebrities that are relevant to the product category are likely to be more
effective than spokespeople for whom there is no compelling rationale that ties them
to the product.
5. Is a celebrity who is (or perceived) as an expert on the subject more credible?
Again, see Ohanian, I think you will find helpful. She does a nice literature search (if
I correctly remember the article) on spokesperson credibility, trustworthiness, and
expertise in the introduction to her own research. It just came to me that you might
find your answer in social psychology research rather than marketing research. That is,
after all, from whence the marketers got the idea. Try Carl Hovland, Alice Eagly,
William McGuire, Gerald Zaltman, and Melanie Wallendorf. The last two are
psychologist/marketers. In 1979, they published a textbook called Consumer
Behavior: Basic Findings and Management Implications. They have a section on
source credibility that is excellent. Let me quote you a few of their sentences: Source
credibility is the believability of a particular source. It is a function of the expertise,
trustworthiness, and attractiveness of a source. (That is why I referred you to
Ohanian). Research indicates that in general, highly credible sources of information
have a strong and immediate impact on attitude change. (You might find specifics in
Fishbein, Petty and Cacciopo - not sure on the spelling of that one.) Recent evidence
causes us to be a little cautious in accepting findings about highly credible sources. It
appears that highly credible sources, such as well known experts, may be liabilities as
well as assets in some types of persuasive communications. The more consumers rely
on their own behavior, the more likely it is that low credibility sources will have
greater influence on behavior than high credibility sources. (Reference to a March
1977 Journal of Consumer Research article by Ruby Dholakia and Brian Sternthal.) In
general, the credibility of a source is greater when the source is thought to be
objective. The more the members of an audience perceive the source to be similar to
them, the more persuasive the source will be.

6. Should the properties of the celebrity be transferred to the properties of the


endorsed product/brand?
It is my opinion that the endorser and the products have to "match." Remember from
the article that a bland product (such as bath towels) tends to take on the properties of
the endorser. Bath towels endorsed by Madonna are attractive, risky, and almost
unpleasant. Christie Brinkley' s, however, are more attractive, more feminine, and
softer. The endorsers tended to pass on their images to products that had somewhat
undefined images.

7. How can you minimise the attributes of a former celebrity on a product/brand in a


new celebrity endorsement campaign
P&G' s Mr. Whipple for their Charmin toilet paper immediately comes to
my mind. He certainly was not a celebrity before the ad aired. Although P&G
does not use him anymore (I think, I' m not sure because I watch very little
television), he would be recognized by most people over 18. I suspect that
you could find other examples, perhaps even in advertising textbooks. I
cannot definitively tell you how Mr. Whipple established his credibility
and expertise, however he was portrayed as a supermarket worker and seemed
trustworthy. He also irritated many viewers (that may be why he was
eliminated as a spokesperson) although sales of Charmin always went up when
his ads were run. I know I read that last piece of information somewhere, I
did not make it up. I do not remember the source.
8. How can you intensify the desired celebrity' s attributes and at the same time
minimise the celebrity's attributes that are inappropriate for endorsing the
product/brand?
I can't give you an answer without a specific situation. What kind of inappropriate
attribute are you referring too?

9. How can you minimise the ' vampire effect'


? (celebrity is remembered, but not the
product/brand)
I remember some advertising a while back that used clips of famous actors and
actresses from old films (John Wayne and Humphrey Bogart). Unfortunately, I do not
remember the products although I am certain it was not for tourism. The fact that I
remember the celebrities and not the products is worth some consideration. I know
that that is not what advertisers want.

10. Is an association between the cultural values of the celebrity'


s world and the
endorsed product required in order to have a successful transfer of meaning?
I was listening to a program about Julia Child on Saturday commemorating her death.
She was asked why she never endorsed products because she certainly had been asked
many times. Her response was, "My television viewers should not think that my
beliefs are up for sale."

I hope this has been helpful. If not, tell me and I will try again.

Sincerely,

Lynn Langmeyer
Levy, Sidney J. Ph.D.
Coca-Cola Distinguished Professor of Marketing
Special Assistant to the Department Head
Eller College of Management
University of Arizona
Tel: (520) 626-2075
E-mail: slevey@eller.arizona.edu

Questions;

1. Do endorsers, no matter what type, generate somewhat higher expectations,


intent-to-purchase and believability than a non-endorsed promotion campaign?
I think that endorsers do heighten consumer response when they are effective. No
endorsement says, here it is, but even a genial non-celebrity announcer adds human
interest and persuasive value; and Michael Jordan did a terrific job for Nike.

2. Is celebrity endorsement more crucial for a technical, complex and information-


dependent product than for a non-technical, simple, commodity-type product?
Celebrity endorsement may help any product, but the more knowledgeable or suited
to the product, the better the result. Jordan didn't help much with products or services
he endorsed that I know I saw but cannot even remember because they had no special
connection to who he is. Probably the more technical the product and the more expert
the endorser the better the result, as we then assume they really know what they are
endorsing. A famous car racer should know about motor oil; it' s nice, but matters less
if he, say, likes some ice cream brand.

3. Is a celebrity who is not connected with the product/brand more objective?


Well, if they are known to be connected or too connected, they become more like
salespeople rather than enthusiastic fans, and their self-interest may make them
suspect. That' s probably true of all of them to some degree when we know they are
being paid for the endorsement. But many celebrities put forth product lines that do
well even if they are not objective. Elizabeth Taylor' s perfumes have done well,
maybe even better than if she had merely endorsed Chanel.

4. Is a celebrity who is closely associated with the product/brand more


trustworthy? There is probably a continuum. The worst case is a celebrity thought to
be doing it just for the money and suspected or known not even to use the product or
to have actually panned it. At the other end, if they designed it and it is thought to be
a good product and their devotion seems sincere, and we like the celebrity, why
shouldn' t we trust them?

5. Is a celebrity who is (or perceived) as an expert on the subject more credible?


Of course, why not? What good was a non-smoker compared to Winston Churchill
when it comes to cigars? Or an ordinary bike rider even such as Tom Cruise
compared to Lance Armstrong? Credible means believable; why shouldn' t we believe
a more knowledgeable person?

6. Should the properties of the celebrity be transferred to the properties of the


endorsed product/brand? I'm not sure what you mean by should and transferred by
whom. In general, the better the fit, the better the fit. Almost any celebrity can help
the consumption of anything, say milk, if they imply they use it and like it and we like
them both, so why not; but how much better if we have reason to believe that their
consumption of milk has actually contributed to their success--maybe their skin or
figure or avoidance of osteoporosis. Of course, relationships are of many kinds. Paul
Newman has no special qualities that make him similar to a good salad dressing, etc.;
but his name on his line, as a famous actor whose women fans loved his blue eyes,
and his contribution of the profits to charity, made a winning combination. On the
other hand, Jimmy Dean was a country singer, so his farm-associated products are
especially suitable. After all, wouldn' t a country singer be expected to know a good
pork sausage when he tasted one? I think so, and used his on a pizza I made from
scratch yesterday. Even unlikeliness can be an asset. Somehow, the surprise that we
feel about George Foreman, former prize fighter, amiably advertising home
appliances, makes him seem endearing--and we can reason that the appliances should
be sturdy, like him.

7. How can you minimise the attributes of a former celebrity on a product/brand in


a new celebrity endorsement campaign? I' m not sure what you mean here? Why do
you want to do this? Even celebrities with attributes some people don't like (Who?
Maybe Zsa Zsa Gabor?) might still be suited to promoting something, otherwise why
use them?

8. How can you intensify the desired celebrity' s attributes and at the same time
minimise the celebrity' s attributes that are inappropriate for endorsing the
product/brand? I don' t know, maybe if you gave me an example I could reason about
it. The simplest thing I think of is to display or emphasize the attribute you chose him
or her for and ignore all else. If that doesn' t seem possible, for whatever reason,
maybe make fun of the negative attribute so that it is being recognized, but imply it
isn't anything serious or not really true, or appeal to the people who don' t mind it.

9. How can you minimise the ' vampire effect'


? (celebrity is remembered, but not
the product/brand) This can be a serious problem and probably often happens. The
main way around it is to make the linking strong and to persist at it so we learn that
one of the things the celebrity is known for is promoting the product/brand.

10. Is an association between the cultural values of the celebrity' s world and the
endorsed product required in order to have a successful transfer of meaning?
This is a fancy theoretical question. Basically, I'
d say No, not required, because we
can successfully learn to associate practically anything with anything else, if that'
s
what we are taught. But Yes, to make it easier, more acceptable, more rational,
etc. Glamorous, gorgeous Elizabeth Taylor and diamonds, sure; Olympic gymnast
Mary Lou Retton and diamonds, well, no.

Fun talking to you, Robert. Good luck,

Sidney
Newell, Stephen
Associate Professor
Western Michigan University
Tel: (269) 387-6166
E-mail steve.newell@wmich.edu

Robert:

Let me give you a little general information on endorsers in advertising to start. As


you probably know so bear with me, one of the basic models of advertising is the
elaboration likelihood model, which argues that there are two basic ways to
presenting advertising in order to affect attitudes. The first, is the central (cognitive)
route - that is presenting facts, figures and logical arguments in order to convince
someone to buy (or try) your product. These products tend to have distinct
advantages over the competition, they are often complex, technical, medical, etc -
type products and services. The second is the peripheral (emotional) route - that uses
image, music, etc. to create a mood or feeling. These products tend to be relatively
undifferentiated from their competition, they often are consumer goods (though there
are exceptions like jewellery) and try to bypass logic and sell on an emotional
basis. The peripheral routes (and those products associated with it) are the ones that
most often use celebrity endorsers. Note: in advertising practice today many
companies hedge their bets by creating a combination ad strategy - some logic along
with drama or emotion.

Some general notes on celebrity endorsers:

ROLE OF ENDORSERS IN ADVERTISING

celebrity is a personality (actor, entertainer, athlete, other prominent person) who is


known to the public for his or her accomplishments.

Why use celebrity endorsers? It is hoped that the celebrities will favorably influence
consumer's attitudes and behaviors toward the products they endorse.

Does this work? Studies indicate that attitudes and perceptions of products are
enhanced by celebrity endorsers. Though not all brands or all celebrities effectively
complement each other.

Overall, celebrity endorsers are especially effective when consumer’s motivation to


process arguments is low. In other words, when advertisers want to take the
peripheral route to persuasion, celebrities work well.

How are celebrities selected?

1.) Survey ratings on Endorsers

One rating system is called the "Q-Ratings" * people are asked two questions:

a) Have you heard of this person?; and


b) If so, do you rate him/her as one of your favourites?

Bill Cosby was known by 95% of the people, of which 45% considered him a
favourite. His Q-Rating was 47 (45 divided by 95) Rosanne Barr was known by 93%,
but favourite of only 15%. Her Q-Rating was 16.
2. Celebrity Credibility * perceived trustworthiness and expertise

3. Celebrity/Audience Match-Up

4. Celebrity/Brand Match-Up

5. Celebrity Attractiveness * friendliness, likeability, and physique

6. Other Considerations * cost, likelihood of celebrity getting in trouble, how difficult


that they are to work with, other brands they are endorsing (i.e.,
saturation).

Endorser Attributes
Two key attributes are important for endorser effectiveness:

1. Credibility * Trust and Expertise


2. Attractiveness (Process of Identification) * physical attractiveness, similarity,
familiarity, and liking.

Findings:
* Attractive endorsers are only more effective when the product is attractiveness-
related.
* If an audience likes an endorser, the ad is more effective.
*If an audience identifies with the endorser, the ad is more effective.

Questions;

1. Do endorsers, no matter what type, generate somewhat higher expectations,


intent-to-purchase and believability than a non-endorsed promotion campaign?
Not, necessarily. It depends on the celebrity; the product and the audience (see
guidelines above). It is not a perfect strategy for all situations.

2. Is celebrity endorsement more crucial for a technical, complex and information-


dependent product than for a non-technical, simple, commodity-type product?
Based on the elaboration likelihood model, it seems that simple commodity goods (in
general) would benefit more from celebrities than more complex products, however,
if a celebrity has an expertise in an area then they may be able to focus on more
technical products. For example, Tiger Woods could be a very effective celebrity
spokesperson talking about the specific advantages of a golf club that he endorses.

3. Is a celebrity who is not connected with the product/brand more objective?


I am not sure what this means. Connected in terms of what?

4. Is a celebrity who is closely associated with the product/brand more


trustworthy? It depends.

5. Is a celebrity who is (or perceived) as an expert on the subject more credible?


Often yes. Tiger Woods is an example when he endorsed golf clubs.

6. Should the properties of the celebrity be transferred to the properties of the


endorsed product/brand? This is what matching the brand to the celebrity is all
about. A new or non descript brand could pick a celebrity in order to transfer the
positive perceptions of the celebrity to the brand.

7. How can you minimise the attributes of a former celebrity on a product/brand in


a new celebrity endorsement campaign? This is a complex question. If the past
association has been positive and the new campaign continues on the same path with
similar celebrities, then minimizing the memories of the last endorser may not be
necessary. IF however, the brand wants to distant itself from the past endorser (say he
or she is thrown in jail) then the brand may want to deviate in a much more significant
way from the campaign of the past, thus, a whole new strategy needs to be worked out.

8. How can you intensify the desired celebrity' s attributes and at the same time
minimise the celebrity' s attributes that are inappropriate for endorsing the
product/brand? This really can' t be answered without understanding the specific
situation. In general, however, they need to determine which positive attributes fit
best with the consumers and the brand and emphasize them in the advertising and just
avoiding (or even making fun of) the negative traits of the endorser.

9. How can you minimise the ' vampire effect'? (celebrity is remembered, but not
the product/brand) This is tough. One specific problem is celebrities endorsing large
numbers of different products. A celebrity that is seen all the time in a variety of ads
loses the power of brand association. Also, the advertisers must remember that the
purpose of an ad is to sell the product, so though the celebrity will play a major role in
the ad, the ad must have plenty of product shots, product-dialog, and in general the
real star must be the product.

10. Is an association between the cultural values of the celebrity' s world and the
endorsed product required in order to have a successful transfer of meaning?
I am not sure what the cultural values of the "celebrity'
s world" means exactly. There
is no question that there has to be meaning transfer, but this meaning may come from
the roles they play and the general persona they have created for themselves (real or
not).

Hope this helps.


Solomon, Michael R.
Human Sciences Professor of Consumer Behavior
Department of Consumer Affairs
College of Human Sciences
Auburn University
Tel: 334.844.1316
E-mail: msolomon@auburn.edu

I'm delighted that you have decided to focus on consumer behavior in your
research. You pose some very good questions -- but as with many areas of
research there is not always a single clear-cut answer. I'm assuming you
learned of me by reading my Consumer Behavior textbook - most likely the
European edition written with my co-authors Gary Bamossy and Soren
Askegaard (published by Pearson in the UK). If so you will see a chapter on
Changing Attitudes through Communication that addresses several of these
issues. You should find the references useful to elaborate on this text – in
particularly many articles in the Journal of Advertising have been published on
celebrity endorsements.

Questions;

1. Do endorsers, no matter what type, generate somewhat higher expectations,


intent-to-purchase and believability than a non-endorsed promotion campaign?
Not automatically. It depends on the star; the product and the target group.

2. Is celebrity endorsement more crucial for a technical, complex and information-


dependent product than for a non-technical, simple, commodity-type product?
Assuming the celebrity is an expert, then I think so, for example, Michael Jordan is a
very effective spokesperson talking about the specific advantages of a sports drink
(Gatorade) that he endorses.

3. Is a celebrity who is not connected with the product/brand more objective?


Linked to conditions of what? If you mean that the star is not compensated for his/her
endorsement, then yes

4. Is a celebrity who is closely associated with the product/brand more


trustworthy? Again, it depends on the star; the product and the target group

5. Is a celebrity who is (or perceived) as an expert on the subject more credible?


I think so, (see Michael Jordan)

6. Should the properties of the celebrity be transferred to the properties of the


endorsed product/brand? Often yes.

7. How can you minimise the attributes of a former celebrity on a product/brand in


a new celebrity endorsement campaign? This is a difficult situation. I don’t think
they can be minimised
8. How can you intensify the desired celebrity' s attributes and at the same time
minimise the celebrity'
s attributes that are inappropriate for endorsing the
product/brand? Emphasize positive attributes.

9. How can you minimise the 'vampire effect'


? (celebrity is remembered, but not
the product/brand) This is a common problem, emphasize the product/brand.

10. Is an association between the cultural values of the celebrity' s world and the
endorsed product required in order to have a successful transfer of meaning?
Not specifically, but it will help in order to get the message across.

I wish you the best of luck with your dissertation!

"There is nothing as practical as a good theory." Kurt Lewin

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen