A.

The aff is boring as shit, like seriously run a unique argument, we have heard X aff
like 5000000 times and heard about nuke war and extinction even more, we literally
almost fell asleep during that round.

B.Boredom is the root cause of all evil and always has been. This is empirically proven.

Kierkegaard
1843(
Either/Or, February 20, 1843, philopher)
People with experience maintain that proceeding from a basic principle is supposed to be very
reasonable; I yield to them and proceed from the basic principle that all people are boring. Or is
there anyone who would be boring enough to contradict me in this regard? This basic principle has
to the highest degree the repelling force always required in the negative, which is actually the
principle of motion. It is not merely repelling but infinitely repulsive, and whoever has the basic
principle behind him must necessarily have infinite momentum for making discoveries. If, then, my
thesis is true, a person needs only to ponder how corrupting boredom is for people, tempering
his reflections more or less according to his desire to diminish or increase his impetus, and if he
wants to press the speed of the motion to the highest point, almost with danger to the
locomotive, he needs only to say to himself: Boredom is the root of all evil. It is very curious that
boredom, which itself has such a calm and sedate nature, can have such a capacity to initiate
motion. The effect that boredom brings about is absolutely magical, but this effect is one not of
attraction but of repulsion.

How corrupting boredom is, everyone recognizes also with regard to children. As long as children
are having a good time, they are always good. This can be said in the strictest sense, for if they
at times become unmanageable even while playing, it is really because they are beginning to be
bored; boredom is already coming on, but in a different way. Therefore, when selecting a
nursemaid, one always considers essentially not only that she is sober, trustworthy, and good-
natured but also takes into esthetic consideration whether she knows how to entertain
children. Even if she had all other excellent virtues, one would not hesitate to give her the sack if
she lacked this qualification. Here, indeed, the principle is clearly acknowledged, but things go
on so curiously in the world, habit and boredom have gained the upper hand to such a degree, that
justice is done to esthetics only in the conduct of the nursemaid. It would be quite impossible to
prevail if one wanted to demand a divorce because one's wife is boring, or demand that a king be
dethroned because he is boring to behold, or that a clergyman be exiled because he is boring to
listen to, or that a cabinet minister be dismissed or a journalist be executed because he is
frightfully boring.

Since boredom advances and boredom is the root of all evil, no wonder, then, that the world
goes backwards, that evil spreads. This can be traced back to the very beginning of the
world. The gods were bored; therefore they created human beings. Adam was bored because he
was alone; therefore Eve was created. Since that moment, boredom entered the world and grew in
quantity in exact proportion to the growth of population. Adam was bored alone; then Adam and
Eve were bored en famille. After that, the population of the world increased and the nations were
bored en masse. To amuse themselves, they hit upon the notion of building a tower so high that it
would reach the sky. This notion is just as boring as the tower was high and is a terrible
demonstration of how boredom had gained the upper hand. Then they were dispersed around the
world, just as people now travel abroad, but they continued to be bored. And what consequences
this boredom had: humankind stood tall and fell far, first through Eve, then from the Babylonian
tower.

C.EVIL IS INHERENTLY IMMORAL, PREVENTING ANY MORAL ACTION

Ronald L.Conte Jr. Roman Catholic theologian May
13, 2010 http://www.catechism.cc/articles/moral-object.htm
The moral species of an act is determined by the moral object. The moral object (or
simply the object) is the end, in terms of morality, toward which the chosen act is
inherently directed. This intrinsic ordering of an act toward its moral object (a good or
evil end) constitues the essential moral nature of the act. An act that is inherently
ordered toward an evil end is, by the very nature of the act, immoral. An act
that is inherently ordered toward only good in its object is good by its very
nature. But all three fonts must be good for the overall act to be moral. When
the moral object is evil, the act is called intrinsically evil. Every intrinsically evil act
is inherently directed toward an evil moral object. Intrinsically evil acts are inherently
immoral; therefore, nothing can cause an intrinsically evil act to become moral.
Such an act is, in and of itself, evil. Intrinsically evil acts are always immoral. In order
to avoid sin, a person must choose a different type of act, an act with a good moral
object rather than an evil moral object.The moral object is the end, in terms of morality,
toward which a knowingly chosen act is inherently directed. This intrinsic ordering of the
act itself toward the moral object constitutes the moral nature, also called the moral
species, of the act. An act with an evil moral object is intrinsically directed toward an
immoral end. Any act with an evil moral object is inherently immoral, because the act, by
its very nature, is ordered toward moral evil; it is an intrinsically disordered act. Every
act with an evil moral object is intrinsically evil, and therefore always immoral, regardless
of intention or circumstances. Nothing can cause an intrinsically evil act to become moral
because the act is evil by its very nature.

D. Alt:WE MUST ACT MORALLY, EVEN IF IT MEANS OUR OWN DEATH. This means
we must reject boredom.
Watson, philosophy professor, Washington University, WORLD HUNGER AND MORAL
OBLIGATION, 1977, pp. 118-9.
One may even have to sacrifice one’s life or one’s nation to be moral in
situations where practical behavior would preserve it. For example, if a prisoner of
war undergoing torture is to be a (perhaps dead) patriot even when reason tells him that
collaboration will hurt no one, he remains silent. Similarly, if one is to be moral, one
distributes available food in equal shares even if everyone dies. That an action is
necessary to save one’s life is no excuse for behaving unpatriotically or immorally if one
wishes to be a patriot or moral. No principle of morality absolves one of behaving
immorally simply to save one’s life or nation. There is a strict analogy here between
adhering to moral principles for the sake of being moral, and adhering to Christian
principles for the sake of being Christian. The moral world contains pits and lions,
but one looks always to the highest light. The ultimate test always harks back to the
highest principle – recant or die. The ultimate test always harks back to the highest
principle – recant or die – and it is pathetic to profess morality if one quits when the
going gets rough.