Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
2003-45
November 10, 2003
HIGHLIGHTS
OF THIS ISSUE
These synopses are intended only as aids to the reader in
identifying the subject matter covered. They may not be
relied upon as authoritative interpretations.
Rev. Rul. 2003–111, page 1009. Rev. Proc. 2003–78, page 1029.
2003 base period T-bill rate. The „base period T-bill rate‰ This procedure provides instructions for establishing exemp-
for the period ending September 30, 2003, is published as tion from the section 4371 foreign insurance excise tax under
required by section 995(f) of the Code. certain United States income tax treaties. Rev. Proc. 92–39
superseded in part.
Rev. Rul. 2003–112, page 1007.
Work Opportunity Tax Credit (WOTC). This ruling concerns
the eligibility criteria for the Work Opportunity Tax Credit. The
ruling clarifies that an individual whose family receives assis-
tance for the requisite period meets the requirements to be
certified as a qualified IV-A recipient under section 51(d)(2)(A)
of the Code if the individual is included on the grant (and thus
receives assistance) for some portion of the specified period.
ADMINISTRATIVE
Introduction
The Internal Revenue Bulletin is the authoritative instrument of court decisions, rulings, and procedures must be considered,
the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for announcing official and Service personnel and others concerned are cautioned
rulings and procedures of the Internal Revenue Service and for against reaching the same conclusions in other cases unless
publishing Treasury Decisions, Executive Orders, Tax Conven- the facts and circumstances are substantially the same.
tions, legislation, court decisions, and other items of general
interest. It is published weekly and may be obtained from the
The Bulletin is divided into four parts as follows:
Superintendent of Documents on a subscription basis. Bul-
letin contents are consolidated semiannually into Cumulative
Bulletins, which are sold on a single-copy basis. Part I.—1986 Code.
This part includes rulings and decisions based on provisions of
It is the policy of the Service to publish in the Bulletin all sub- the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
stantive rulings necessary to promote a uniform application of
the tax laws, including all rulings that supersede, revoke, mod- Part II.—Treaties and Tax Legislation.
ify, or amend any of those previously published in the Bulletin. This part is divided into two subparts as follows: Subpart A,
All published rulings apply retroactively unless otherwise indi- Tax Conventions and Other Related Items, and Subpart B, Leg-
cated. Procedures relating solely to matters of internal man- islation and Related Committee Reports.
agement are not published; however, statements of internal
practices and procedures that affect the rights and duties of
taxpayers are published. Part III.—Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous.
To the extent practicable, pertinent cross references to these
subjects are contained in the other Parts and Subparts. Also
Revenue rulings represent the conclusions of the Service on the included in this part are Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rul-
application of the law to the pivotal facts stated in the revenue ings. Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rulings are issued by
ruling. In those based on positions taken in rulings to taxpayers the Department of the TreasuryÊs Office of the Assistant Sec-
or technical advice to Service field offices, identifying details retary (Enforcement).
and information of a confidential nature are deleted to prevent
unwarranted invasions of privacy and to comply with statutory
requirements. Part IV.—Items of General Interest.
This part includes notices of proposed rulemakings, disbar-
ment and suspension lists, and announcements.
Rulings and procedures reported in the Bulletin do not have the
force and effect of Treasury Department Regulations, but they
may be used as precedents. Unpublished rulings will not be The last Bulletin for each month includes a cumulative index
relied on, used, or cited as precedents by Service personnel in for the matters published during the preceding months. These
the disposition of other cases. In applying published rulings and monthly indexes are cumulated on a semiannual basis, and are
procedures, the effect of subsequent legislation, regulations, published in the last Bulletin of each semiannual period.*
The contents of this publication are not copyrighted and may be reprinted freely. A citation of the Internal Revenue Bulletin as the source would be appropriate.
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402.
* Beginning with Internal Revenue Bulletin 2003–43, we are publishing the index at the end of the month, rather than at the beginning.
Mid-Term
AFR 3.32% 3.29% 3.28% 3.27%
110% AFR 3.65% 3.62% 3.60% 3.59%
120% AFR 3.99% 3.95% 3.93% 3.92%
130% AFR 4.33% 4.28% 4.26% 4.24%
150% AFR 5.00% 4.94% 4.91% 4.89%
175% AFR 5.84% 5.76% 5.72% 5.69%
Long-Term
AFR 4.99% 4.93% 4.90% 4.88%
110% AFR 5.49% 5.42% 5.38% 5.36%
120% AFR 6.01% 5.92% 5.88% 5.85%
130% AFR 6.51% 6.41% 6.36% 6.33%
Dutch Administrative taxation not in accordance with this Con- presented for competent authority consid-
Arrangements MAP Agreement vention. The Netherlands and the United eration are under consideration by appel-
States are committed to assisting taxpay- late or judicial authorities where permitted
Announcement 2003–63 ers in the conduct of cases under the MAP, under applicable national procedures.
to ensuring taxpayers know what they can In order to ensure timely progress in the
Following is a copy of the News Re- expect from the competent authorities, and procedure, the competent authority of the
lease issued by the Director, International to making the MAP as expeditious and country that made the adjustment (the “rel-
(U.S. Competent Authority), on October 7, effective as possible. evant competent authority”) will endeav-
2003 (IR–2003–116). Particular areas in which MAP cases our to deliver a position paper to its coun-
arise include, but are not limited to: terpart (the “responding competent author-
The U.S. And The Netherlands Develop ity”) within 120 days of acceptance of a
New Administrative Arrangements for i. determination of appropriate transfer case from a taxpayer. The case will be
Mutual Agreement Procedure pricing methodologies to be applied discussed without a written response un-
to cross-border transactions between less such a response is needed to facili-
IR–2003–116, Oct. 7, 2003 associated enterprises and/or whether tate substantive discussion. If a written re-
transfer prices used in cross-border sponse is needed in a case concerning at-
WASHINGTON — The competent au- transactions between associated enter- tribution of profits or transfer pricing ad-
thorities of the United States and the prises are established at arm’s length; justments under Article 7 or 9 of the Con-
Netherlands have agreed to new Ad- vention, the responding competent author-
ministrative Arrangements that outline ii. determination of appropriate attribu-
ity will endeavor to provide a position pa-
guiding principles to follow when us- tions of profits to the permanent estab-
per within 240 days after receipt of the first
ing the Mutual Agreement Procedure lishments of enterprises; and
position paper. In all other cases in which
(the MAP) found in Article 29 of the a written response is needed, the respond-
iii. determination of residence under Ar-
U.S.-Netherlands income Tax Conven- ing competent authority will endeavor to
ticle 4 of the Convention.
tion. The Arrangements were devel- deliver a position paper within 120 days
oped to ensure that the MAP process of receipt of the first position paper. In
In these and other areas of difficulties
works as efficiently and effectively as cases of Advance Pricing Agreements or
and doubts arising as to the interpreta-
possible. Arrangements, the competent authorities
tion or application of the Convention, the
Netherlands and the United States are will endeavor to agree upon a joint tar-
The text of the Agreement is as follows: get timetable for each stage of the consid-
committed to promoting and supporting
domestic initiatives and programs de- eration, with the aim of securing Mutual
Administrative Arrangements for Agreements within a similar overall time-
the Implementation of the Mutual signed to assist taxpayers and to helping
taxpayers in avoiding or resolving disputes frame, taking into account the complexi-
Agreement Procedure (Article 29) of ties of the particular cases involved.
the Convention Between the Kingdom which might arise.
of the Netherlands and the United These Arrangements set out certain ob-
The role of the taxpayer during
States of America for the Avoidance of jectives and practices the Netherlands and
procedure
Double Taxation and the Prevention of the United States will adopt in dealing with
Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes cases under the MAP of the Convention The Netherlands and the United States
on Income and Capital Gains (Signed with a view to ensuring taxation in accor- agree that, in law, the negotiation of a MAP
on December 18, 1992, as Amended by dance with the Convention. is a government-to-government process. A
Protocols) (the “Convention”) taxpayer has no legal right to attend nego-
Progress of the Mutual Agreement
tiations between the competent authorities
Procedure
The competent authorities of the or to observe the negotiations.
Netherlands and the United States hereby The Netherlands and the United States However, it is also recognized that the
enter into an agreement under the Mutual agree that requests presented under Article taxpayer is a key stakeholder in the MAP
Agreement Procedure Article (Article 29) 29 of the Convention shall be dealt with process. The competent authorities there-
of the Convention, with a view to the as expeditiously as possible. The objective fore agree that they will keep taxpayers in-
effective administration and resolution is to resolve cases accepted for considera- formed about the progress of a case under
of cases conducted between them under tion by the competent authorities within 18 the MAP and will invite them to provide
the process. The Mutual Agreement Pro- months from transmittal of a position pa- such further information as may be help-
cedure (the “MAP”) of the Convention per by one Contracting State to the other, ful in reaching a resolution. At their dis-
provides that the competent authorities of excluding time during which the issues cretion, they may allow information to be
the two Contracting States shall endeavour provided to them in a joint presentation by
to resolve by mutual agreement cases of the taxpayer.
03. Inclusions in Income of Lessees of procedures described in § 1.280F–7(a). lessees of electric automobiles should use
Passenger Automobiles. Lessees of passenger automobiles other Table 12 of this revenue procedure.
The inclusion amounts for passen- than trucks, vans, and electric automo-
ger automobiles (including § 168(k)(1) biles should use Table 10 of this revenue
passenger automobiles and § 168(k)(4) procedure in applying these procedures,
passenger automobiles) first leased in cal- while lessees of trucks and vans should
endar year 2003 are calculated under the use Table 11 of this revenue procedure and
04. Maximum Automobile Value for Us- the resulting increase, after rounding to in calendar year 2002) by $4,600. Simi-
ing the Cents-per-mile Valuation Rule. the nearest $100, is added to $12,800 to larly, the revised depreciation limits pro-
(1) Amount of Adjustment. Under give the maximum value for calendar year vided in this section for electric automo-
§ 1.61–21(e)(1)(iii)(A), the limitation on 2003. biles that are § 168(k)(1) passenger au-
the fair market value of an employer-pro- (2) The Maximum Automobile Value. tomobiles were calculated by augmenting
vided passenger automobile first made For passenger automobiles first made the existing limitations on the first year al-
available to any employee for personal available in calendar year 2003 to any em- lowance in Rev. Proc. 2001–19 (for elec-
use after 1988 is to be adjusted in accor- ployee of the employer for personal use, tric automobiles placed in service in calen-
dance with § 280F(d)(7). Accordingly, the vehicle cents-per-mile valuation rule dar year 2001) and in Rev. Proc. 2002–14
the adjustment for any calendar year is may be applicable if the fair market value (for electric automobiles placed in service
the percentage (if any) by which the CPI of the passenger automobile on the date in calendar year 2002) by $13,800 ($4,600
automobile component for October of it is first made available does not exceed tripled).
the preceding calendar year exceeds the $15,200. (2) Amount of the Revised Limitation.
CPI automobile component for October 05. Revised Limitation Amounts for For § 168(k)(1) passenger automobiles
1987. See, section 4.02(1) of this revenue § 168(k)(1) Passenger Automobiles Placed (other than electric automobiles) placed in
procedure. The new car component of in Service During 2001 and 2002. service by the taxpayer in calendar year
the CPI was 115.2 for October 1987 and (1) Calculation of the Revised Amount. 2001, Table 13 of this revenue procedure
136.7 for October 2002. The October The revised depreciation limits provided in contains the revised dollar amount of
2002 index exceeded the October 1987 this section for § 168(k)(1) passenger auto- the depreciation limitations for each tax
index by 21.5. The Service has, therefore, mobiles (other than electric automobiles) year. For electric automobiles that are
determined that the adjustment for 2003 were calculated by augmenting the exist- § 168(k)(1) passenger automobiles placed
is 18.66 percent (21.5/115.2 x 100%). ing limitations on the first year allowance in service by the taxpayer in calendar
This adjustment is applicable to all em- in Rev. Proc. 2001–19 (for passenger year 2001, Table 14 of this revenue pro-
ployer-provided passenger automobiles automobiles placed in service in calendar cedure contains these revised amounts.
first made available to any employee for year 2001) and in Rev. Proc. 2002–14 (for For § 168(k)(1) passenger automobiles
personal use in calendar year 2003. The passenger automobiles placed in service (other than electric automobiles) placed in
maximum fair market value specified in service by the taxpayer in calendar year
§ 1.61–21(e)(1)(iii)(A) must therefore 2002, Table 15 of this revenue procedure
be multiplied by a factor of 0.1866, and contains the revised dollar amount of
SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE 26 CFR 601.403: Miscellaneous excise taxes col- signs, issues or sells any of the documents
lected by return. or instruments subject to the tax imposed
This revenue procedure, with the excep- by section 4371, or for whose use or ben-
tion of section 4.05, applies to passenger Rev. Proc. 2003–78 efit such document or instrument is made,
automobiles (other than leased passenger signed, issued or sold.
automobiles) that are first placed in service .04 Pursuant to income tax treaties be-
SECTION 1. PURPOSE
by the taxpayer during calendar year 2003, tween the United States and several coun-
to leased passenger automobiles that are This revenue procedure provides in- tries, policies issued by a foreign insurer
first leased by the taxpayer during calen- structions for establishing exemption from or reinsurer that is a resident of any of
dar year 2003, and to employer-provided the section 4371 excise tax on insurance such countries may be exempt from the in-
passenger automobiles first made available premiums paid to a foreign insurer or surance excise tax. This revenue proce-
to employees for personal use in calendar reinsurer when the exemption is based on dure applies to a treaty excise tax exemp-
year 2003. Section 4.05 of this revenue the provisions of an income tax treaty to tion that is either a qualified exemption
procedure applies to § 168(k)(1) passenger which the United States is a party. (for example, the exemption in the treaties
automobiles that are placed in service by with Germany and France) or an exemp-
the taxpayer during calendar year 2001 or SECTION 2. BACKGROUND tion subject to an anti-conduit arrangement
2002. limitation (for example, the exemption in
.01 Section 4371 of the Internal Rev- the treaty with the United Kingdom), de-
SECTION 6. EFFECT ON OTHER enue Code generally imposes a tax (the pending on the treaty.
DOCUMENTS "insurance excise tax") on each policy of
insurance or reinsurance with respect to SECTION 3. EXEMPTION
Rev. Proc. 2001–19 and Rev. Proc. United States risks issued by any foreign PROCEDURE
2002–14 are amplified. insurer or reinsurer, unless the premiums
paid are taxed as income effectively con- .01 A person otherwise required to re-
DRAFTING INFORMATION nected with the conduct of a United States mit the insurance excise tax on account
trade or business. of premiums paid to a foreign insurance
The principal author of this revenue .02 Section 4374 provides that the in- or reinsurance company may consider the
procedure is Bernard P. Harvey of the surance excise tax shall be paid by any per- premiums exempt from the insurance ex-
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel son who makes, signs, issues, or sells any cise tax under an income tax treaty if the
(Passthroughs and Special Industries). For of the documents and instruments subject premiums are paid to an insurer or rein-
further information regarding the depre- to the tax, or for whose use or benefit the surer that is a resident for treaty purposes
ciation limitations and lessee inclusion same are made, signed, issued or sold. of a country with which the United States
amounts in this revenue procedure, con- .03 Section 46.4374–1(c) of the Excise has a treaty containing an excise tax ex-
tact Mr. Harvey at (202) 622–3110; for Tax Regulations provides that the insur- emption and, prior to filing the return for
further information regarding the maxi- ance excise tax shall be paid on the basis the taxable period, such person has knowl-
mum automobile value for applying the of a return. Such return shall be filed and edge that there was in effect for such tax-
vehicle cents-per-mile valuation rule, con- tax remitted by the person who makes the able period a closing agreement between
tact John B. Richards of the Office of the payment of a premium to a foreign insurer the Internal Revenue Service and the for-
Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and or reinsurer. If the tax is not paid by the eign insurer or reinsurer as provided by
Government Entities) at (202) 622–6040 person who makes payment of a premium, section 3.04(2). As part of the closing
(not toll-free calls). the insurance excise tax shall be paid on the agreement, the foreign insurer or reinsurer
basis of a return by any person who makes, must agree to be liable as a United States
WHEREAS, the determinations set forth above are hereby agreed to by Taxpayer:
This Closing Agreement is final and conclusive except:
(1) the matter it relates to may be reopened in the event of fraud, malfeasance, or misrepresentation of material fact;
Date
By
Title
(Name of Taxpayer and authorized representative)
Address
Taxpayer Identification Number
(If the applicant does not already have a TIN, one will be supplied by the Service pursuant to the completed Form SS–4
submitted with the request for the closing agreement)
Treaty Country
Commissioner of the Internal Revenue
By
Associate Chief Counsel (International)
Date
By
Director, International
Date
APPENDIX B
WHEREAS, the determinations set forth above are hereby agreed to by Taxpayer:
This Closing Agreement is final and conclusive except:
(1) the matter it relates to may be reopened in the event of fraud, malfeasance, or misrepresentation of material fact;
(2) it is subject to the Code sections that expressly provide that effect be given to their provisions (including any stated exception
for section 7122) notwithstanding any other law or rule of law; and
(3) if it relates to a tax period ending after the date of this agreement, it is subject to any change or modification of applicable
statutes or tax conventions that apply to that tax period.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the above parties have subscribed their names to these presents, in triplicate.
Date
By
Title
(Name of Taxpayer and authorized representative)
Address
Taxpayer Identification Number
(If the applicant does not already have a TIN, one will be supplied by the Service pursuant to the completed Form SS–4
submitted with the request for the closing agreement)
Treaty Country
Commissioner of the Internal Revenue
By
Associate Chief Counsel (International)
Date
By
Director, International
Date
California
Napa Napa
(April 1–November 15)
Palm Springs Riverside
(January 1–May 31)
San Francisco San Francisco
Santa Monica City limits of Santa Monica
Tahoe City Placer
Colorado
Aspen Pitkin
(January 1–April 30)
Silverthorne/Keystone Summit
Telluride San Miguel
(December 20–September 30)
Vail Eagle
(December 1–March 31)
District of Columbia
Washington, D.C. (also the cities of Alexandria, Fairfax, and Falls Church, and the counties of Arlington, Fairfax, and Loudoun,
in Virginia; and the counties of Montgomery and Prince George’s in Maryland)
Florida
Key West Monroe
(January 1–April 30)
Naples Collier
(December 16–April 15)
Idaho
Coeur d’Alene Kootenai
(June 1–September 30)
Sun Valley City limits of Sun Valley
Illinois
Chicago Cook and Lake
Louisiana
New Orleans/St. Bernard Orleans, St. Bernard,
(January 1–May 31) Plaquemine, and Jefferson Parishes
Maine
Kennebunk/Kittery/Sanford York
(June 15–October 31)
Maryland
(For the counties of Montgomery and Prince George’s, see District of Columbia)
Baltimore Baltimore
Ocean City Worcester
(June 15–October 31)
Massachusetts
Boston Suffolk
Cambridge Middlesex (except Lowell)
Martha’s Vineyard Dukes
(June 1–October 15)
Nantucket Nantucket
(June 15–October 15)
Michigan
Mackinac Island Mackinac
Traverse City Grand Traverse
Montana
Big Sky Gallatin (except West Yellowstone)
Nevada
Stateline Douglas
New Jersey
Atlantic City Atlantic
(June 1–November 30)
Cape May Cape May (except Ocean City)
(June 1–November 30)
Edison Middlesex (except Piscataway)
Newark Essex, Bergen, Hudson and Passaic
Ocean City City limits of Ocean City
(June 15–September 15)
Piscataway/Belle Mead Somerset; and the city limits of Piscataway
Princeton/Trenton Mercer
New York
The Bronx/Queens The boroughs of The Bronx and Queens
Brooklyn The borough of Brooklyn
Manhattan The borough of Manhattan
Nassau County/Great Neck Nassau
Staten Island Richmond
Suffolk County Suffolk
White Plains City limits of White Plains
Utah
Park City Summit
(December 15–March 31)
Virginia
(For the cities of Alexandria, Fairfax, and Falls Church, and the counties of Arlington, Fairfax, and Loudoun, see District
of Columbia)
Wintergreen Nelson
Washington
Seattle King
.04 Changes in high-cost localities. method described in section 4.02 of this same manner as applied under the Federal
The list of high-cost localities in section revenue procedure for any travel away Travel Regulations, 41 C.F.R. Part 301–11
5.03 of this revenue procedure differs from from home, and may use the per diem (2003), except as provided in sections 6.02
the list of high-cost localities in section substantiation method described in section through 6.04 of this revenue procedure.
5.03 of Rev. Proc. 2002–63. 4.01 of this revenue procedure for any .02 Federal per diem rate. A receipt
(1) The following localities (listed by OCONUS travel away from home. for lodging expenses is not required in de-
key cities) have been added to the list of .06 Transition rules. A payor who used termining the amount of expenses deemed
high-cost localities: Naples, Florida; and the substantiation method of section 4.01 substantiated under section 4.01 or 5.01 of
Coeur d’Alene, Idaho. of Rev. Proc. 2002–63 for an employee this revenue procedure. See section 7.01 of
(2) The portion of the year for which the during the first 10 months of calendar year this revenue procedure for the requirement
following are high-cost localities (listed by 2003 may not use the High-Low Substan- that the employee substantiate the time,
key city) has been changed: Santa Monica, tiation Method in section 5 of this revenue place, and business purpose of the expense.
California; and King of Prussia/Ft. Wash- procedure for that employee until January .03 Federal per diem or M&IE rate. A
ington/Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania. 1, 2004. A payor who used the High-Low payor is not required to reduce the federal
(3) The following localities have been Substantiation Method of section 5 of Rev. per diem rate or the federal M&IE rate for
removed from the list of high-cost locali- Proc. 2002–63 for an employee during the the locality of travel for meals provided in
ties: San Mateo/Redwood City, California; first 10 months of calendar year 2003 must kind, provided the payor has a reasonable
Sunnyvale/Palo Alto/San Jose, California; continue to use the High-Low Substantia- belief that meal and incidental expenses
Ogden/Layton/Davis County, Utah; Provo, tion Method for the remainder of calendar were or will be incurred by the employee
Utah; and Salt Lake City, Utah. year 2003 for that employee. A payor de- during each day of travel.
(4) The borough of Brooklyn is now scribed in the previous sentence may use .04 Proration of the federal per diem
separately listed as a high-cost locality and the rates and high-cost localities published or M&IE rate. Pursuant to the Federal
is no longer combined with the boroughs in section 5 of Rev. Proc. 2002–63, in lieu Travel Regulations, in determining the fed-
of The Bronx and Queens. of the updated rates and high-cost locali- eral per diem rate or the federal M&IE rate
.05 Specific limitation. ties provided in section 5 of this revenue for the locality of travel, the full applica-
(1) Except as provided in section procedure, for travel on or after Novem- ble federal M&IE rate is available for a
5.05(2) of this revenue procedure, a payor ber 1, 2003, and before January 1, 2004, if full day of travel from 12:01 a.m. to 12:00
that uses the high-low substantiation those rates and localities are used consis- midnight. The method described in sec-
method with respect to an employee must tently during this period for all employees tion 6.04(1) of this revenue procedure must
use that method for all amounts paid to reimbursed under this method. be used for purposes of determining the
that employee for travel away from home amount deemed substantiated under sec-
within CONUS during the calendar year. SECTION 6. LIMITATIONS AND tion 4.03 or 4.05 of this revenue procedure
See section 5.06 of this revenue procedure SPECIAL RULES for partial days of travel away from home.
for transition rules. For purposes of determining the amount
(2) With respect to an employee de- .01 In general. The federal per diem deemed substantiated under section 4.01,
scribed in section 5.05(1) of this revenue rate and the federal M&IE rate described in 4.02, 4.04 or 5 of this revenue procedure
procedure, the payor may reimburse actual section 3.02 of this revenue procedure for for partial days of travel away from home,
expenses or use the meals only per diem the locality of travel will be applied in the either of the following methods may be
AMERICAN SAMOA
Eastern District 9501 9502 9503 9504
9505 9506 9507 9508
9509
Manu’a District 9517 9518
Rose Island 9519
Swains Island 9520
Western District 9510 9511 9512.01 9512.02
9512.03 9513 9515 9516
GUAM
Guam 9501 9502 9503 9504
9505 9506 9507 9508
9509 9510 9511 9512
9513 9514 9515 9516
9517 9518 9519 9520
9521 9522 9523 9524
9525 9526 9527 9528
SECTION 4. EFFECT ON OTHER this section, or the if purchase of the res- date as of which the list of qualified census
REVENUE PROCEDURES idence was made during the period speci- tracts is rendered obsolete by a new rev-
fied in this section. The period begins on enue procedure.
This revenue procedure supplements November 10, 2003, the date of publica-
Rev. Proc. 2003–49 by providing a list tion of this revenue procedure in the In- SECTION 7. DRAFTING
of qualified census tracts for the Northern ternal Revenue Bulletin, and ends on the INFORMATION
Mariana Islands, American Samoa, and date as of which the list of qualified census
Guam. tracts is rendered obsolete by a new rev- The principal authors of this revenue
enue procedure. procedure are Laura W. Lederman and
SECTION 5. SCOPE Timothy L. Jones of the Office of As-
SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE sociate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and
An issuer may rely on the list of quali- Government Entities). For further infor-
fied census tracts set forth in this revenue This revenue procedure is effective on mation regarding this revenue procedure,
procedure with respect to a commitment November 10, 2003, the date of publica- contact Ms. Lederman at (202) 622–3980
to provide financing, if that commitment tion of this revenue procedure in the In- (not a toll-free call).
was made during the period specified in ternal Revenue Bulletin, and ends on the
Abbreviations
The following abbreviations in current use ER—Employer. PR—Partner.
and formerly used will appear in material ERISA—Employee Retirement Income Security Act. PRS—Partnership.
EX—Executor. PTE—Prohibited Transaction Exemption.
published in the Bulletin.
F—Fiduciary. Pub. L.—Public Law.
A—Individual. FC—Foreign Country. REIT—Real Estate Investment Trust.
FICA—Federal Insurance Contributions Act. Rev. Proc.—Revenue Procedure.
Acq.—Acquiescence.
FISC—Foreign International Sales Company. Rev. Rul.—Revenue Ruling.
B—Individual.
BE—Beneficiary. FPH—Foreign Personal Holding Company. S—Subsidiary.
F.R.—Federal Register. S.P.R.—Statement of Procedural Rules.
BK—Bank.
FUTA—Federal Unemployment Tax Act. Stat.—Statutes at Large.
B.T.A.—Board of Tax Appeals.
C—Individual. FX—Foreign corporation. T—Target Corporation.
G.C.M.—Chief Counsel’s Memorandum. T.C.—Tax Court.
C.B.—Cumulative Bulletin.
GE—Grantee. T.D. —Treasury Decision.
CFR—Code of Federal Regulations.
CI—City. GP—General Partner. TFE—Transferee.
GR—Grantor. TFR—Transferor.
COOP—Cooperative.
IC—Insurance Company. T.I.R.—Technical Information Release.
Ct.D.—Court Decision.
CY—County. I.R.B.—Internal Revenue Bulletin. TP—Taxpayer.
LE—Lessee. TR—Trust.
D—Decedent.
LP—Limited Partner. TT—Trustee.
DC—Dummy Corporation.
DE—Donee. LR—Lessor. U.S.C.—United States Code.
M—Minor. X—Corporation.
Del. Order—Delegation Order.
Nonacq.—Nonacquiescence. Y—Corporation.
DISC—Domestic International Sales Corporation.
DR—Donor. O—Organization. Z —Corporation.
P—Parent Corporation.
E—Estate.
PHC—Personal Holding Company.
EE—Employee.
E.O.—Executive Order. PO—Possession of the U.S.
Bulletins 2003–27 through 2003–45 2003-63, 2003-38 I.R.B. 577 2003-50, 2003-29 I.R.B. 119
2003-64, 2003-39 I.R.B. 646 2003-51, 2003-29 I.R.B. 121
Announcements: 2003-65, 2003-40 I.R.B. 748 2003-52, 2003-30 I.R.B. 134
2003-67, 2003-40 I.R.B. 753 2003-53, 2003-31 I.R.B. 230
2003-45, 2003-28 I.R.B. 73
2003-68, 2003-41 I.R.B. 824 2003-54, 2003-31 I.R.B. 236
2003-46, 2003-30 I.R.B. 222
2003-69, 2003-42 I.R.B. 851 2003-55, 2003-31 I.R.B. 242
2003-47, 2003-29 I.R.B. 124
2003-70, 2003-43 I.R.B. 916 2003-56, 2003-31 I.R.B. 249
2003-48, 2003-28 I.R.B. 73
2003-71, 2003-43 I.R.B. 922 2003-57, 2003-31 I.R.B. 257
2003-49, 2003-32 I.R.B. 339
2003-72, 2003-44 I.R.B. 964 2003-58, 2003-31 I.R.B. 262
2003-50, 2003-30 I.R.B. 222
2003-73, 2003-45 I.R.B. 1017 2003-59, 2003-31 I.R.B. 268
2003-51, 2003-37 I.R.B. 555
2003-60, 2003-31 I.R.B. 274
2003-52, 2003-32 I.R.B. 345 Proposed Regulations:
2003-61, 2003-32 I.R.B. 296
2003-53, 2003-32 I.R.B. 345
REG-209377-89, 2003-36 I.R.B. 521 2003-62, 2003-32 I.R.B. 299
2003-54, 2003-40 I.R.B. 762
REG-208199-91, 2003-40 I.R.B. 757 2003-63, 2003-32 I.R.B. 304
2003-55, 2003-38 I.R.B. 597
REG-106486-98, 2003-42 I.R.B. 853 2003-64, 2003-32 I.R.B. 306
2003-56, 2003-39 I.R.B. 694
REG-108639-99, 2003-35 I.R.B. 431 2003-65, 2003-32 I.R.B. 336
2003-57, 2003-37 I.R.B. 555
REG-106736-00, 2003-28 I.R.B. 60 2003-66, 2003-33 I.R.B. 364
2003-58, 2003-40 I.R.B. 746
REG-108524-00, 2003-42 I.R.B. 869 2003-67, 2003-34 I.R.B. 397
2003-59, 2003-40 I.R.B. 746
REG-115037-00, 2003-44 I.R.B. 967 2003-68, 2003-34 I.R.B. 398
2003-60, 2003-45 I.R.B. 1049
REG-140378-01, 2003-41 I.R.B. 825 2003-69, 2003-34 I.R.B. 403
2003-61, 2003-42 I.R.B. 890
REG-107618-02, 2003-27 I.R.B. 13 2003-70, 2003-34 I.R.B. 406
2003-62, 2003-41 I.R.B. 821
REG-122917-02, 2003-27 I.R.B. 15 2003-71, 2003-36 I.R.B. 517
2003-63, 2003-45 I.R.B. 1015
REG-128203-02, 2003-41 I.R.B. 828 2003-72, 2003-38 I.R.B. 578
2003-64, 2003-43 I.R.B. 934
REG-131997-02, 2003-33 I.R.B. 366 2003-73, 2003-39 I.R.B. 647
2003-65, 2003-43 I.R.B. 935
REG-133791-02, 2003-35 I.R.B. 493 2003-74, 2003-43 I.R.B. 923
2003-66, 2003-45 I.R.B. 1049
REG-138495-02, 2003-37 I.R.B. 541 2003-75, 2003-45 I.R.B. 1018
2003-67, 2003-44 I.R.B. 1005
REG-138499-02, 2003-37 I.R.B. 541 2003-76, 2003-43 I.R.B. 924
2003-68, 2003-45 I.R.B. 1050
REG-140808-02, 2003-38 I.R.B. 582 2003-77, 2003-44 I.R.B. 964
Notices: REG-140930-02, 2003-38 I.R.B. 583 2003-78, 2003-45 I.R.B. 1029
REG-141402-02, 2003-43 I.R.B. 932 2003-79, 2003-45 I.R.B. 1036
2003-38, 2003-27 I.R.B. 9
REG-141669-02, 2003-34 I.R.B. 408 2003-80, 2003-45 I.R.B. 1037
2003-39, 2003-27 I.R.B. 10
REG-142538-02, 2003-38 I.R.B. 590 2003-81, 2003-45 I.R.B. 1046
2003-40, 2003-27 I.R.B. 10
REG-143679-02, 2003-38 I.R.B. 592 Revenue Rulings:
2003-41, 2003-28 I.R.B. 49
REG-144908-02, 2003-38 I.R.B. 593
2003-42, 2003-28 I.R.B. 49
REG-146893-02, 2003-44 I.R.B. 967 2003-70, 2003-27 I.R.B. 3
2003-43, 2003-28 I.R.B. 50
REG-157164-02, 2003-44 I.R.B. 1004 2003-71, 2003-27 I.R.B. 1
2003-44, 2003-28 I.R.B. 52
REG-162625-02, 2003-35 I.R.B. 500 2003-72, 2003-33 I.R.B. 346
2003-45, 2003-29 I.R.B. 86
REG-163974-02, 2003-38 I.R.B. 595 2003-73, 2003-28 I.R.B. 44
2003-46, 2003-28 I.R.B. 53
REG-108676-03, 2003-36 I.R.B. 523 2003-74, 2003-29 I.R.B. 77
2003-47, 2003-30 I.R.B. 132
REG-112039-03, 2003-35 I.R.B. 504 2003-75, 2003-29 I.R.B. 79
2003-48, 2003-30 I.R.B. 133
REG-113112-03, 2003-40 I.R.B. 761 2003-76, 2003-33 I.R.B. 355
2003-49, 2003-32 I.R.B. 294
REG-116914-03, 2003-32 I.R.B. 338 2003-77, 2003-29 I.R.B. 75
2003-50, 2003-32 I.R.B. 295
REG-121122-03, 2003-37 I.R.B. 550 2003-78, 2003-29 I.R.B. 76
2003-51, 2003-33 I.R.B. 361
REG-129709-03, 2003-35 I.R.B. 506 2003-79, 2003-29 I.R.B. 80
2003-52, 2003-32 I.R.B. 296
REG-130262-03, 2003-37 I.R.B. 553 2003-80, 2003-29 I.R.B. 83
2003-53, 2003-33 I.R.B. 362
REG-132483-03, 2003-34 I.R.B. 410 2003-81, 2003-30 I.R.B. 126
2003-54, 2003-33 I.R.B. 363
REG-132760-03, 2003-43 I.R.B. 933 2003-82, 2003-30 I.R.B. 125
2003-55, 2003-34 I.R.B. 395
2003-83, 2003-30 I.R.B. 128
2003-56, 2003-34 I.R.B. 396 Revenue Procedures:
2003-84, 2003-32 I.R.B. 289
2003-57, 2003-34 I.R.B. 397
2003-45, 2003-27 I.R.B. 11 2003-85, 2003-32 I.R.B. 291
2003-58, 2003-35 I.R.B. 429
2003-46, 2003-28 I.R.B. 54 2003-86, 2003-32 I.R.B. 290
2003-59, 2003-35 I.R.B. 429
2003-47, 2003-28 I.R.B. 55 2003-87, 2003-29 I.R.B. 82
2003-60, 2003-39 I.R.B. 643
2003-48, 2003-29 I.R.B. 86 2003-88, 2003-32 I.R.B. 292
2003-61, 2003-42 I.R.B. 851
2003-49, 2003-29 I.R.B. 89 2003-89, 2003-37 I.R.B. 525
2003-62, 2003-38 I.R.B. 576
1 A cumulative list of all revenue rulings, revenue procedures, Treasury decisions, etc., published in Internal Revenue Bulletins 2003-1 through 2003-26 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2003-27,
dated July 7, 2003.
Tax Conventions:
Treasury Decisions:
1 A cumulative list of current actions on previously published items in Internal Revenue Bulletins 2003-1 through 2003-26 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2003-27, dated July 7, 2003.
84-28
Obsoleted by
Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B. 388
84-30
Obsoleted by
Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B. 388
85-55
Obsoleted by
Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B. 388
85-136
Obsoleted by
Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B. 388
86-52
Obsoleted by
Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B. 388
87-1
Obsoleted by
Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B. 388
87-95
Superseded by
Rev. Rul. 2003-109, 2003-42 I.R.B. 839
88-7
Obsoleted by
Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B. 388
89-72
Obsoleted by
Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B. 388
94-56
Superseded by
Rev. Rul. 2003-109, 2003-42 I.R.B. 839
2003-58
Distinguished by
Rev. Rul. 2003-102, 2003-38 I.R.B. 559
Treasury Decisions:
9033
Removed by
T.D. 9065, 2003-36 I.R.B. 515
9083
Corrected by
Ann. 2003-60, 2003-45 I.R.B. 1049