Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
REPORT
ON
CHILD LABOR IN
INDIA
Report submitted
BY
Binu s sharma
1. Introduction
Across the globe, to a lesser or greater degree, visible or invisible,
admittedly or otherwise, child labour exists. The forces and circumstances, which
compel the child to work in its early stage of childhood, speak of deprivations of
the severest kind. Child labour is both an economic and social problem. It is a
social evil resulting in moral degradation of the children. Child labour deprives
the child education training and skill. Which are the requisites of earning power
and economic development? The issue of child labour can be extremely
controversial, not only because so many children work illegally but also because
their work so often involves abuse and exploitation. It is also generally believed
that the most dramatic forms of exploitation of working children are associated
with waged labour.
Child labor learns not only the present generation but also the posterity. If
one conceives the idea of a child labour. It begins before the eyes the picture of
exploitation of little, physically tender, illiterate and under-nourished children
working in hazardous occupations and unhealthy conditions under which they
are often employed, eventually them to severe health and safety hazards. The
problems of child labour in such that it can hardly be legislated away as it roots
lie in abject poverty and backwardness of the society.
2. Concept
Magnitude of child labor may be ascertained by; (a) considering the number
of child labourers, (b) the percentage of children who work as labourers (i.e.,
the participation rate as percentage of over-all participation rate. If in an
area, the participation rate of children as percentage of general participation
rate is higher, the relative prevalence of child labour may be considered to
be high there. The world’s population of working children has yet to be
counted accurately. Because it is often illegal and clandestine, child labour
lies beyond the reach of conventional statistics. New survey methods are
penetrating the screen of obscurity, which for too long has concealed the
problem from public view. The finding reveals a tragedy of far greater
magnitude than earlier. Some 250 million children between the ages of 5-14
are working in the developing countries-120 million children between the
age of 5-14 are working in the developing countries-120 million full-time and
130 million part-time. Some 61 per cent of this total or nearly 153 million are
found in Asia; 32 percent or 80 million are in Africa and 7 per cent or 17.5
million live in Latin America. These estimates are based on a new and more
accurate methodology recently tested by the ILO’s Bureau of Statistics in
Ghana, India, Pakistan, Senegal and Turkey (Chandra, 1977, pp. 19-34).
TABLE 3.1
Child Labor at World Level, 1995
Asia Perce Africa Perce Latin Perce Europe, Perce
nt nt America nt Oceania, nt
Middle East
Bhutan 55.10 Mali 25.30 Haiti 25.30 Portugal 1.76
East 45.39 Burkina 51.05 Guatemal 16.22 Albania 1.11
Timor a
Nepal 45.18 Burundi 48.97 Brazil 16.09 Italy 0.38
Pakistan 17.67 Niger 45.17 Bolivia 14.36 Romania 0.17
Banglade 30.12 Uganda 45.31 Dominica 16.06 Hungary 0.17
sh
Thailand 16.22 Ethiopia 42.30 Nicaragua 14.05 Solomon, 28.89
Islands
India 14.37 Kenya 41.27 Paraguay 7.87 Papua new 19.31
Guinea
China 11.55 Senegal 31.36 Mexico 6.73 Polynesia 3.67
Indonesi 9.55 Zimbabwe 29.44 Colombia 6.62 Turkey 24.00
a
Vietnam 9.12 Nigeria 25.75 Costa 5.48 Yemen 20.15
Rica
Philippin 8.04 Cameroon 25.25 Argentina 4.53 Syrian Arab 5.78
e Rep.
Malaysia 3.16 CoteD’ 20.46 Peru 2.48 Iran 4.71
Voire
Hong 0.00 Zambia 16.27 Uruguay 2.08 Iraq 2.95
Kong
Japan 0.00 Ghana 13.27 Venezuel 0.95 Jordon 0.68
a
Egypt 11.23Chile 0..00 Saudi Arabia 0.00
Morocco 5.61Cuba 0.00
Algeria 1.63
South 0.00
Africa
Tunisia 0.00
Source: “Treads of Child labor in India: A Review” in Exploited Children: A
Comprehensive Blueprint for Child labor Rehabilitation M. Koteswara Rao (Ed).2000
An analysis of the child labour situation in Asia reveals certain hidden facts.
Figures in Tables 3.2 and 3.3 shows that countries with relatively high per capita
income could also succeed in reducing total as well as female literacy rates and
the poverty ratio. In countries like Singapore, Republic of Korea, Japan, Kuwait
and Saudi Arbia, both poverty ratio as well as incidence of child labour has
reduced to zero per cent. This shows an extremely positive correlation between
poverty ration and incidence of child labour. Furthermore in countries like
republic of Korea and Japan, the total and female literacy rates have fallen below
5 per cent. Few exceptions are also observed. In countries like Sri Lanka,
Thialand, Vietnam and Philippines, despite significant reduction in retires if
illiteracy, the child labour still exists. With moderately high illiteracy rates,
percentage of poverty ratio and child labour are nearly at par in China (11 and
10 percentages respectively). In countries like Kuwait and Saudi Arbia, though
both poverty ratio and child labour do not exist, high rates of illiteracy exist.
Table 3.2
Population, per capita Income & Government’s Expenditure on
Education in 20 Counties of Asia
Sr Country Total Density of Per Public Education
no. Populatio Population Capita Expenditure (Year 1995)
n (in (number)per Income( as percentage of
Million) sq.km Year GDP) in
Year 1998 1998 Dollar
PPP
Year
1998
Total Govt. GNP
Expenditure
20 Iraq 22 NA 3,197 NA NA
Table 3.3
Percentage figures of Child labor, Illiteracy Rate & Population
below Poverty line in 20 countries of Asia.
Sr Country Child Labor Total Female Poverty
no. Percentage of Illiteracy in Illiteracy in Ratio in
Age group 10- Percentage percentage Percentage
14 Years
3 Pakistan 23 17 70 56 81 71.1 34
7 Thailand 25 15 9 5 12 6.8 13
8 Malaysia 8 3 27 13.6 34 18 16
In countries like India Bangladesh and Pakistan, the percentage figures of child
labor, illiteracy and poverty ration are all abnormally high. It is strange to note
that in Vietnam, poverty ratio is at 51percent, but child labor is only at 8 per
cent. The figures of Government’s expenditure on education do not, however,
clearly indicate and definite trend or respective impacts on reduction of illiteracy
and child labour. It is however, observed that Nepal occupies the Worst position
with respect to both percentage figures of illiteracy (60.8) and child labour (44).
Both these rates are highest among the 20 countries of Asia. The empirical data
reveals that those countries, which succeeded much in reducing illiteracy and
poverty, could also succeed in reducing their percentage figures of child labour.
A comparative analysis of the incidence of child labour in India with that in
the world, Asia and China; the incidence of child labour is here measured by the
participation rates for children, 10-14 years over a period ranging from 1950 to
2010 (as projected). (Table 3.4)
Table 3.4
Participation Rates for Children: 10-14 Years
Year/ 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 1995 2000 2010
Region
Up to 1990, the participation rate of children was higher in Asia compared to the
aggregate world figure; thereafter the Asian rate has fallen below the world rate.
The Chinese rate was higher than Asian rate up to 1990. Thereafter, China has
experienced a sharp fall in the rate, and China is expected to be free from child
labor by 2010. The participation rate for children was much lower in India than in
Chine in 1950. The occurrence rate of child labour in China continued to be
higher than that of India up to 1980. Thereafter, the fall in child participation rate
has been much shower in India compared to China. The Indian rate exceeded the
Chinese rate by 1990; by 2010. It is expected that the participation rate of
children would be around 7.46 in India.
• Child population (both male & female) is lowest in Kerala among the
states in both rural and urban India.
• Utter Pradesh has the highest number of rural male children and
Rajasthan has the highest number of rural female children in 1993-
94.
Table 3.5
The state wise distribution of child workers (10-14 Age groups according to
1971, 81 and 91 census)
Sr State/ Union Child workers in the age group of 0-14 (Millions)
no. Territories
1971 1981 1991
Main Child Marginal Total Child
Workers Child Workers
Workers
1 Andhra Pradesh 1,627,492 1,951,312 1,537,293 124,647 1,661,940
2 Assam 239,349* ** 259,953 67,645 327,598
3 Bihar 1,059,359 1,101,764 795,444 146,801 942,245
4 Gujarat 518,061 611,913 373,027 150,558 523,585
5 Haryana 137,826 1,94,189 89,030 20,661 109,691
6 Himachal Pradesh 71,384 99,624 30,771 25,667 56,438
7 Jammu & Kashmir 70,384 258,437 0
8 Karnataka 808,719 1,131,530 818,159 158,088 976,247
9 Kerala 111,801 92,854 28,590 6,210 34,800
10 Madhya Pradesh 1,112,319 1,698,597 997,940 354,623 1,352,563
11 Maharashtra 988,357 1,557,765 805,847 262,571 1,068,418
12 Manipur 16,380 20,217 13,478 3,015 16,493
13 Meghalaya 30,440 44,916 30,730 3,903 34,633
14 Nagaland 13,726 16,235 16,106 370 16,476
15 Orissa 492,477 702,293 325,250 127,144 452,394
16 Punjab 232,774 216,939 132,414 10,454 142,868
17 Rajasthan 587,389 819,605 490,522 283,677 774,199
18 Sikkim 15,661 8,561 5,254 344 5,598
19 Tamil Nadu 713,305 975,055 523,125 56,764 578,879
20 Tripura 17,490 24,204 13,506 2,972 16,478
21 Uttar Pradesh 1,326,726 1,434,675 1,145,087 264,999 1,410,086
22 West Bengal 511,443 605,263 593,387 118,304 711,691
23 And. & Nik. Island 572 1,309 758 507 1,265
24 Arunachal Pradesh 17,925 17,950 11,632 763 12,395
25 Chandigarh 1,086 1,986 1,839 31 1,870
26 Dadra & Nagar 3,102 3,615 2,677 1,739 4,416
Haveli
27 Delhi 17,120 25,717 26,670 681 27,351
28 Daman & Diu 7,391 9,378 741 200 941
29 Goa 3,938 718 4,656
30 Lakshadweep 97 56 17 17 34
31 Mizoram *** 6,314 6,391 10,020 16,411
32 Pondicherry 3,725 3,606 2,565 115 2,680
Total 10,753,98 13,640,8 9,082,141 2,203,208 11,285,34
5 70 9
*Includes figures of Mizo district which then formed part of Assam
**1981 Census could not be conducted in Assam due to disturbed conditions prevailing there then
***Census figures of 1971 in respect of Mizoram included under Assam
Table 3.6
Magnitude of Child Labor as Estimated by Different Organization
Year No. of Children Organization/ Institute
1971 10.74 million Census
1972-73 16.33 27th round of N.S.S.
1975 15.10 I.L.O.
1981 13.60 Census
1982 17.36 38th Round of N.S.S.
1983 44.00 ORG Baroda
1985 111.00 Balai Manila
1987-88 17.02 43rd Round of N.S.S
1991 23.02 D.P Chaudhari
1994 20.00 Labor Ministry
1995 74.80 CACL
1996 140.00 Rashmi Sehgal
1996 35.00 UNICEF
1997 73.00 UNICEF
Source: Quoted in R.R. Patel, “Eliminating Child Labor: Some National and
International Limitation”, Social Change, Vol.27 No.3-4, Sept-Dec. 1997, p.174
• The number of full time child workers increased from 13,400,000 in 1951 to 14,
500, 000, in 1961 and then decreased to 12,700,000.
• The marginal child labor increased from 2,400,000 in 1981, to 10,500,000 in
1990 and the decreased to 2,203,208 in 1991
• There is a massive group of children referred to as “nowhere children”, which
appear neither in official labor statistics nor in the education statistics. The ILO
estimates that the number of children in the age group 5 to 14 years, who are
neither in school nor in the labor force, is 24,000,000.
• The combined total of full-time child workers, marginal child workers and
“nowhere children”. Amounts to over 97,000,000 or almost 40 per cent of the 5
to 14 years child population (Dasgupta, 1997.p.18).
The NSS data over the period 1977-78 to 1993-94 shows that the incidence of child
labor has been decline over time in both rural and urban areas. In rural areas, till 1987-
88, the percentage of child labor for boys was higher than for girls while in 1993-94, the
percentage are same for girls. In case of urban areas, percentages for boys were always
higher than that for girls (Table 3.7). There is a heavy concentration of child labor
between the age group of 10-14. With the urbanization, various types of activities, most
hazardous are generated. Activities like hotels and restaurants, tea-stalls, motor
garages and repairing shops, etc. naturally absorb more children at a low wage rate
(Pal, 2001, p.187).