Sie sind auf Seite 1von 61

Kaizen Events:

Achieving Rapid Improvement in


Healthcare Settings
Society for Health Systems
Orlando, FL
February 21, 2008

Company
LOGO
Building a Lean Enterprise
KAIZEN

Kai Zen
Break apart Study
To change Make better

EVENT
Rapid Improvement
© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 3
Improvement Roles

Who? Accountability Tool


Strategic

Leadership “What has to happen” Value Stream


Mapping / A3
Middle
Management
Tactical

Workforce “How it will happen” Kaizen Events

© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 4


Value Stream Defined

Value Stream: All of the activities, required to


satisfy a customer need from request to receipt.

Value Stream

Process Process Process

Custom er

Customer Customer
Request Receipt
“Order” “Delivery”

© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 5


Typical Healthcare Value Stream
“Pre-Production”

Appointment
or Need
Admission Determined
Scheduled Start

Patient Evaluation Diagnosis


Patient Patient
Arrival / & &
Discharged Follow-up
Admission Testing Treatment

“Production”

Payment Claim
Received Submitted

End
“Post-Production”
© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 6
Individual vs. System Performance

Systems focus =
0ptimal value stream
performance

Isolated pockets of excellence =


sub-optimization risk

© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 7


Customer Demand:
CT=Cycle Time
Current State Value Stream Map 15 patients per Day
(Takt Time = 32 minutes)
LT=Lead Time
%C&A=% Complete & Accurate
Outpatient Imaging Services 8 hours per day

Pre-register Schedule
Patient Appointment
Refer Patient Patient
(Physician) 2
5 4 Lead T ime = 990 mins. 6 3 Lead Time = 12 mins. 2 1
Cycle T ime = 30 mins. Cycle T ime = 11 mins. % C&A = 65 %
Lead Time = 990 mins. Lead Time = 12 mins.
% C&A = 100 % % C&A = 98 %

Auto Fax 50%


Us Mail 25%
MD Mailbox 25%

Rework Loop
Symposium E Pay Excel ADS Meditech Internet Fax Order PACS via Fax 25% of
Waiting Room
Solutions
Management the time
System

Lead Time = 10 days

Read/Dictate Review / Sign Print Send


Check-in Check-in Prep Patient, Conduct Exam Report Reports Reports
Patient Patient Exam, Transmit (Radiologist) (Radiologist) (Imaging) (Imaging)
(Admitting) (Imaging) Images (T ech) T ranscribe Report
(MDI)
5 mins.
5 mins. 80 mins. 248 mins. 8 365 mins. 9 960 mins. 110 mins. 11 120 mins. 12
5 5 3 6 2 7 2 10 2 6
2
Cycle Time = 2 mins. Cycle T ime = 1 mins. Cycle T ime = 28 mins. Cycle Time = 15 mins. Lead Time = 5 mins. Cycle Time = 1 mins. Cycle T ime = 3 mins.
% C&A = 95 % % C&A = 75 % Cycle Time = 1 mins. % C&A = 99 % % C&A = 90 %
% C&A = 90 % % C&A = 98 % % C&A = 90 %
% C&A = 95 %

0.0833 hrs. 0.0833 hrs. 1.33 hrs. 4.13 hrs. 6.08 hrs. 16 hrs. 1.83 hrs. 2 hrs. LT = 32.5 hrs.
2 mins. 1 mins. 28 mins. 15 mins. 5 mins. 1 mins. 1 mins. 3 mins. CT = 56 mins.
CT/LT Ratio = 2.87%

Rolled First Pass


Value Stream Champion: Paul Scanner yield = 30%

Created July 19, 2005


Key Metrics: Time

Process time (PT)


 The time it takes to actually perform the work, if one is
able to work on it uninterrupted
 Includes “think” time if process is analytical in nature
 aka “touch time,” work time, cycle time
Lead time (LT)
 The elapsed time from the time work is made available
until it’s completed and passed on to the next person or
department in the chain
 aka throughput time, turnaround time, elapsed time

© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 9


Value Stream Lead Time vs.
Process Time

Lead Time

Order Process Time Delivery


(Request) (Receipt)

LT = PT + Delays

© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 10


Process Block Lead Time vs.
Process Time

Lead Time

Process Time
Work The time it takes Work
Received to do the work passed
to next
step
LT = PT + Delays

© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 11


Key Metrics: Quality

%Complete and Accurate (%C&A)


 % time downstream customer can
perform task without having to “CAC”:
 Correct information or material that was
supplied
 Add information that should have been
supplied
 Clarify information that should have been
clear

© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 12


Summary Metrics (continued)

Activity Ratio (AR)


 The percentage of time work is being done to
the product passing through the process
 AR = PT/LT × 100
 100 – AR = Idle time
Rolled First Pass Yield (RFPY)
 %C&A × %C&A × %C&A × …
 Out of 100 occurrences, what percentage of
the time does the product pass through the
entire process error-free?
© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 13
Future State Value Stream Map
Outpatient Imaging Services
Customer Demand: CT=Cycle Time
15 patients per Day LT=Lead Time
(Takt Time = 32 minutes) %C&A=% Complete & Accurate
8 hours per day

Cross
Standard
Training
Work
Work
Co-locate
Balance
Schedule appt
Pre-register Patient
Refer Patient
1
(Physician)
6 3 Lead Time = 45 mins. 2
Cycle T ime = 11 mins. % C&A = 85 %
Lead T ime = 45 mins.
% C&A = 98 %

Lead Time = 5 days Standard Auto Fax 80%


Risk Work Us Mail 15%
Reduction MD Mailbox 5%
(Joint Commision)

Symposium E Pay Excel Meditech Internet Fax Order PACS Rework Loop
Waiting Room
Solutions
Management via Fax 10% of
System the time

Pull System Value Stream 5S


Remove Reduce Data Voice
(Supplies Alignment
Redundant Entry Recognition
Check-in Requirements Kanban)

Set-up Continuous Standard


Standard Visual Batch
Reduction Flow Work
Work Workplace Reductions

Prep Patient, Read/Dictate Review Print Send


Check-in Conduct Exam, Exam /Sign Reports Reports
Patient T ransmit Images (Radiologist) (Radiologist) (Imaging) (Imaging)
(Imaging) (Tech)

5 mins. 60 mins. 120 mins. 6 420 mins. 7 2 mins. 8 30 mins. 9


3 4 5 2 2 2 6
2
Cycle Time = 1 mins. Cycle Time = 15 mins. Cycle T ime = 1 mins. Cycle T ime = 1 mins. Cycle T ime = 3 mins.
Cycle Time = 28 mins. % C&A = 95 % % C&A = 95 % % C&A = 99 % % C&A = 90 %
% C&A = 98 %
% C&A = 90 %

0.0833 hrs. 1 hrs. 2 hrs. 7 hrs. 0.0333 hrs. 0.5 hrs. LT = 11.4 hrs.
1 mins. 28 mins. 15 mins. 1 mins. 1 mins. 3 mins. CT = 49 mins.
CT/LT Ratio = 7.14%
Rolled First Pass
Value Stream Champion: Paul Scanner yield = 59%

Created July 20, 2005


Outpatient Imaging
Improvement Results

Projected
Metric Current State Future State % Improvement
Lead Time 32.5 hrs 11.4 hrs 65%
Process Time 56 Mins 49 Mins 13%
Activity Ratio 2.9% 7.1% 145%
RFPY 30% 59% 97%
# steps 11 8 27%
Report rework 25% 10% 60%
Tech Morale Poor Good Significant

© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 15


Future State Implementation Plan
Value Stream Outpatient Imaging Implementation Plan Review Dates
Executive Sponsor Allen Ward 11/1/2007
Value Stream Champion Sally McKinsey 11/21/2007
Value Stream Mapping Facilitator Dave Parks 12/13/2007
Date Created 10/18/2007 1/10/2008
Block Implementation Schedule (weeks) Date
Goal / Objective Improvement Activity Type Owner
# 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Complete
Implement standard work for referral
2 Improve quality of referral KE Sean O'Ryan
process

Reduce lead time beween schedulingand Dianne


3, 4 Cross-train and colocate work teams PROJ
preregistration steps Prichard

Eliminate the need for two patient check- Michael


5, 6 Collect copays in Imaging KE
ins O'Shea

Dianne
6 Eliminate bottleneck in waiting area Balance work / level demand KE
Prichard

Eliminate lead time associated with


9 Implement voice recognition technology PROJ Sam Parks
transcription step

10 Eliminate batched reading Reduce setup required KE Sam Parks

Reduce inventory costs, regulatory risk Michael


7 5S CT supplies area; implement kanban KE
and storage needs O'Shea

12 Reduce delay in report delivery Implement additional fax ports PROJ Martha Allen

Increase percentage of physicians


12 Reduce delay in report delivery receiving electronic delivery (rather than KE Martha Allen
hard copy)

Approvals
Executive Sponsor Value Stream Champion Value Stream Mapping Facilitator
Signature: Signature: Signature:

Date: Date: Date:


Kaizen Event – Definition

A two- to five-day focused improvement


activity during which a sequestered, cross-
functional team designs and fully
implements improvements to a defined
process or work area, generating rapid
results and learned behavior.
Karen Martin & Mike Osterling
The Kaizen Event Planner, 2007

© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 17


Kaizen Events: Defining
Characteristics
 Typically linked to a value stream map
 Aggressive, measurable objectives
 Sequestered cross-functional team (100% focus)
 Short duration: 2-5 consecutive days
 Professionally facilitated
 Emphasis on the elimination of unnecessary non-
value-adding activities
 Low cost
 Define and exploit the “technical boundaries” of existing
resources
 “Creativity before capital” thinking
 Rapid Implementation (during the event)
 Not simply planning for change

© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 18


ACTION!
Examples of Healthcare
Kaizen Events

Patient flow Administrative


 Imaging  Payroll
 Emergency Department  Recruiting/hiring
 Surgery process
 OB/GYN  Claims
 Cardiac  Medical Records
Ancillary services  Physician
Credentialing
 Lab / pathology
turnaround Space
 5S Nursing areas
 5S Laboratory

© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 20


5-Day Kaizen: Sample Structure

Day 1 & 2 Analyze current state and


Plan perform root cause analysis;
design future state
Day 3 & 4 Design & test improvements
Do, Check using Lean tools; obtain
buy-in
Day 5 Finalize improvements; train
Check, Act process workers and
affected stakeholders;
provide closeout briefing;
CELEBRATE!

© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 21


Interim Briefings to Leadership

Every day or two


Team presents their ideas; leadership assures team
has considered all options and thought through all
implications
Leadership’s role – not to say “no”
 To say “Have you considered this?” “How would we
handle…?” “What if…?”
Workforce grows stronger as they learn how to
identify and eliminate waste
Leadership grows stronger as they’re able to shift
their focus to strategic planning, performance
monitoring, and coaching staff.
© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 22
Kaizen Event Phases

Planning Execution
2-5 Days
4-6 Weeks Prior

Follow
Up
4-8 Weeks Post

© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 23


Kaizen Event Charter
Event Scope Leadership Schedule
Value Stream Imaging
Executive Sponsor Allen Ward Dates 3/24 - 3/27/2008
Event Name Outpatient Imaging
Value Stream Start & End
Specific Conditions CT Scans Sally McKinsey 7:30 am - 4:30 pm
Champion Times

Process Trigger Referral from physician Facilitator Dave Parks Location Conference Room A

First Step Physician's office calls scheduling department Interim


Team Lead Sean Michaels Every day 3:30 - 4:30
Last Step Referring physician receives report Briefings
Workforce
3/27/2008; TBD (11 am - 1 pm)
Event Boundaries & $1,000 budget Training
Event Coordinator Ann Marie
Limitations No major program changes to Medi-Tech Team 3/27/2008
Presentation 3:30 - 4:30 pm
Event Drivers / Current State Issues Team Members
1 Losing patients to new outpatient imaging center Function Name
2 Referring physician complaints re: slow report turnaround 1
3 Patient dissatisfaction re: "hassle factor" 2
4 100% tech turnover in 6 months 3
5 4
Event Goals and Objectives 5
1 Improve quality of referral from 65% to 90% (38% improvement) 6
2 Eliminate patient check-in at Admitting 7
3 Reduce LT for report sign-off from 16 hrs to 7 hrs (65% improvement) 8
4 Reduce waiting area time from 3 hrs to 30 mins (83% improvement) 9
5 10
Potential Deliverables On-Call Support
1 Standard work for referral process / patient education piece Function Name
2 1 Radiologist practice president Marlene Diosdado
3 2 IT Jerry Gambrell
4 3 MD advisotry board pres Dave Madden
5 4
Possible Obstacles Approvals
1 Potential Joint Commission surprise audit Executive Sponsor Value Stream Champion Facilitator
2 No backup if a non-team member tech calls in sick Allen Ward Sally McKinsey Dave Parks
3 Signature: Signature: Signature:
4 Date: Date: Date:
Scoping: Refining the Focus

Nuc Med
MRI
Outpatient
CT
X-Ray
Imaging

Nuc Med
MRI
Inpatient
CR

© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates


X-Ray 25
Kaizen Event Facilitator Traits

 Skills / Knowledge
 Lean tools
 Root cause analysis
 Project & time management
 Team building / facilitation
 People effectiveness – from front line workers to execs
 Authority / Respect
 Designated change agent / influence leader
 Trustworthy
 Comfortable removing obstacles & reaching out to senior leadership
 Personality / Energy
 Challenging, yet supportive
 Positive, upbeat, energetic
 Pushy without irritating ☺
 Objectivity / Fairness
 No attachment to outcome
© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 26
The Kaizen Team

 The single greatest determinant of event success


 No more than 10
 Cross-functional composition
 Process workers
 Upstream suppliers (internal)
 Downstream customers (internal)
 Subject matter experts
 Outside eyes
 External suppliers / contractors
 External customers
 Administrative support (if needed)
 Union representatives (if relevant)
 Maintenance / facilities representatives
 Management (limited representation)
 Sequestered; Must be relieved of regular duties
© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 27
Kaizen Event Phases

Planning
4-6 Weeks Prior
Execution
2-5 Days

Follow
Up
4-8 Weeks Post

© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 28


Team Dynamics

Adjourning Performing

Norming

Storming
Tuckman Model
Forming Bruce Tuckman, 1965

© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 29


Kaizen Commandments – “Top Twelve”

1. No interruptions from outside the Event.


2. No veto power from outside the team.
3. Rank has no privilege.
4. Abandon departmental / silo thinking.
5. Finger-pointing has no place.
6. Avoid scope creep.
7. Use creativity before capital.

© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 30


Kaizen Commandments (continued)

8. Think “yes, if…” instead of “no, because…”


9. Get good data, then add experience and
“instinct” to the mix.
10. Seek the wisdom of ten rather than the
knowledge of one.
11. Keep an open mind. Challenge existing
paradigms. Challenge everything!
12. Improvements implemented today are
better than planning to implement in the
future.
© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 31
Execution Phase Activities

Document the Current State Plan


Perform Root Cause Analysis
Brainstorm and Prioritize
Improvements
Design the Improvement(s) Do
Test the Design(s) Check
Finalize the Design(s) Act
Implement the Improvement(s)

© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 32


Execution Phase Activities

Document the Current State


Perform Root Cause Analysis
Brainstorm and Prioritize Improvements
Design the Improvement(s)
Test the Design(s)
Finalize the Design(s)
Implement the Improvement(s)

© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 33


Current State Documentation
Tools/Activities

Go to Gemba
Spaghetti Diagrams
 Calculate motion / transportation costs and
productivity losses
MBPM
Videotape
Product samples
Floor plans / blueprints
Photos
Process measurements
© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 34
What to Look for at Gemba

“Waste walk”
Workplace organization
Variation in how the work is performed
Work-in-process
 Quantity, oldest in queue, “problem” work, etc.
Layout
 Where people are located relative to their upstream
suppliers and downstream customers
 Where people, equipment, and supplies are located
relative to each other
Ergonomic concerns
Environmental issues – noise, temperature, air
quality, etc.
© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 35
First, Seek to Understand: Go to Gemba
Spaghetti Diagram
Emergency Services
Waiting Area

Physician
Vitals Office Check-out
Benefits / Billing
Verification
Imaging

Exam
Patient Room
History Laboratory

ORDER CASH
The Cost of Unnecessary Motion

Distance traveled to printer


 Work Group A = 92 ft. per occurrence
 Work Group B = 696 ft. per occurrence
120 occurrences / day = 4,656 miles/year
Walk pace = 1 mile per hour = 582 days/year of
unproductive, non-value-adding time = 2.2 FTEs

© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 38


Understand the Current State:
Metrics-Based Process Mapping (MBPM)
Future State Projected Results

Summary Metrics
Pre-Defined Performance Metrics
Current State Projected Future State Desired Direction Projected
Metric Value Units Value Units Up Down Improvement
Critical Path PT Sum 140.0 minutes 65.0 minutes 53.6%
Critical Path LT Sum 2325.0 minutes 405.0 minutes 82.6%
Activity Ratio 6.0 % 16.0 % 166.5%
Rolled First Pass Yield 23.8 % 75.3 % 217.1%
# of Activities 16 activities 8 activities 50.0%
Staffing Metrics
Current State Projected Future State Projected
Metric Value Units Value Units Change
Sum of Total PTs 155.0 minutes 65.0 minutes -58.1%
Occurrences per Year 37500 occurrences 37500 occurrences 0.0%
Staffing Requirements 46.6 FTEs 19.5 FTEs -58.1%
Execution Phase Activities

Document the Current State


Perform Root Cause Analysis
Brainstorm and Prioritize Improvements
Design the Improvement(s)
Test the Design(s)
Finalize the Design(s)
Implement the Improvement(s)

© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 41


Root Cause Analysis

© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 42


Root Cause Analysis

Waste is a symptom.
Causes often lie very deep.
Must discover the root cause to:
 Avoid band-aid fixes
 PERMANENTLY eliminate the waste.

© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 43


Key Root Cause Analysis Tools

Five Whys
Cause-and-Effect diagrams (aka Fishbone
or Ishikawa diagrams)
Check Sheets / Pareto Charts

© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 44


Execution Phase Activities

Document the Current State


Perform Root Cause Analysis
Brainstorm and Prioritize Improvements
Design the Improvement(s)
Test the Design(s)
Finalize the Design(s)
Implement the Improvement(s)

© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 45


PACE Improvement Prioritization Chart
9 22 17
4 23 8 21
3
Easy
10
13
Ease of Implementation
5 1 16
15

20 14
19
6
7

11
2 18

12
Difficult

High Low
Anticipated Benefit
Execution Phase Activities

Document the Current State


Perform Root Cause Analysis
Brainstorm and Prioritize Improvements
Design the Improvement(s)
Test the Design(s)
Finalize the Design(s)
Implement the Improvement(s)

© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 47


Building a Lean Enterprise
Standardize
Work
Install Kanban

OK Time to Replenish

© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 50


Organize the Workplace
BEFORE AFTER
Execution Phase Activities

Document the Current State


Perform Root Cause Analysis
Brainstorm and Prioritize Improvements
Design the Improvement(s)
Test the Design(s)
Finalize the Design(s)
Implement the Improvement(s)
Celebrate!

© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 52


Implementation = Training

Training must occur within the Kaizen


Event itself.
Therefore, it must be innovative
 Stand-up sessions at the work site
 Multiple offerings in a conference room
 Conference call sessions
 Voice mail blasts
 Web-based support
 Email blasts (NEVER sole training method!)
 Designated mentors
© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 53
54
Kaizen Event
Final Presentation Agenda
Value Stream Champion Event Name

Facilitator Event Dates


Agenda Item Presenter(s)
Opening Comments
1 • Team introductions
• Agenda
• "Rules" for attendees
Scope and Objectives
• Process being addressed
• First & last steps
2 • Specific conditions
• Event drivers / current state issues
• Objectives
• Boundaries & limitations
"Before" Condition
3 • VSM and/or MBPM review
• Relevant metrics
• Photos (if relevant)
Key Improvements Implemented
4 • Key improvements and accomplishments implemented during the event
• Tools used

"After" Condition
5 • New process description
• Projected results (direct and collateral)
Key Open Action Items
6
• 30-Day List
Sustainability Plan
7 • Potential obstacles that could prevent attaining projected performance 55
levels
Kaizen Event Phases

Planning Execution
4-6 Weeks Prior 2-5 Days

Follow
Up
4-8 Weeks Post
© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 56
Sustaining Improvement

Hold weekly follow-up meetings


 Full team presence highly desirable
 Event Facilitator or VS Champion leads
 Monitor process, refine if needed
 Transition improvement oversight from Kaizen
Team to area supervision/management
Execute Sustainability Plan
Update VSM
Conduct 30-Day and 60-Day Audits
© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 57
Plan to Succeed – The Sustainability Plan

58
Sustainability Plan – Page 2

59
60
Additional Questions

Karen Martin, Principal


7770 Regents Road #635
San Diego, CA 92122
(858) 677-6799
ksm@ksmartin.com

© 2008 Karen Martin & Associates 61

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen