Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Section B
1 (a) Earnings
1998 = £150 (given in the question)
1999 = £150 × 1·05 = £157·5
2000 = £157·5 × 1·03 = £162·2
2001 = £162·2 × 1·04 = £168·7
(b)
Year (i) RPI (ii) AEI
150 150
1998 162·2 = × 170·3 172·8 = × 124·4
157·5 108
157·5 157·5
1999 164·7 = × 170·3 172·6 = × 124·4
162·9 113·5
162·2 162·2
2000 167·0 = × 170·3 169·6 = × 124·4
165·4 119
168·7 168·7
2001 168·7 = × 170·3 168·7 = × 124·4
170·3 124·4
(c) Using the RPI it shows that Jim has had a real increase in his wages over the four year period.
Using the AEI shows that Jim has actually seen a reduction in his earnings compared to the average wages earned.
(d) 1995 is the base year for the Average Earnings Index. This means that all figures are compared to the average earnings in
the year.
Notes:
1 The historic cost of £10 is not relevant as it is sunk. The relevant cost is the opportunity cost relating to lost scrap proceeds
= 300 × £3 = £900.
2 Again the historic cost is irrelevant as it is a sunk cost. Since the material is in continuous use in the business the relevant
cost will be the current replacement cost of the material = 1,000 × £6·50 = £6,500.
3 Since there is only 300 kg in stock 250 kg would need to be purchased at the current replacement cost = 250 × £4 =
£1,000. If the stock of 300 kg is not used for the contract it would be used to replace material Y in an alternative production
process.
£7
Therefore the relevant cost for the stock of 300 kg is = 300 × = £1,050 bearing in mind the 2 for 1 substitution.
2
Total relevant cost for material C = £1,000 + £1,050 = £2,050
4 Since there is spare capacity in this department there is no relevant cost.
5 For this department the two alternatives need to be considered:
Cost of working overtime = 2,000 × £10 × 1·5 = £30,000
Cost of diverting labour = 2,000 × (£10 + £3) = £26,000
It would be cheaper to divert the labour from the other production processes so the relevant cost for department 2 is £26,000.
6 Since the overheads are absorbed and there is no mention of the overheads actually increasing as a direct result of the contract
there is no relevant cost for overheads.
11
3 (a) Operational planning This is often referred to as short term budgeting and looks at the resources,
production etc for a financial period, usually a year. It provides a detailed plan of
what the organisation hopes will be achieved within the next financial year.
Strategic planning This is often referred to as the long term plan and looks at where the organisation
is heading over a number of years, for example a five year plan would be a long
term plan. It presents the organisation with an idea of the broad direction that it
hopes to be heading in.
The strategic plan will incorporate the operational plans of the organisation. The operational plan translating the strategic plan
into achievable short term goals.
£2,000 = A1 × 1 – 1
0 ⋅ 0075 0 ⋅ 0075 × 1 ⋅ 007536
£2,000 = A1 × 31·447
£2,000
∴ A1 = = £63·60
31·447
Loan 2
–1
APR = 12·68%, then the monthly rate is 1·1268 12 – 1 = 0·01%
1
£2,000 = A2 ×
1
–
0 ⋅ 001 0 ⋅ 001 × 1 ⋅ 0124
£2,000 = A2 × 21·243
£2,000
∴ A2 = = £94·15
21·243
12
5 (a)
Process account
Units £ Units £
Opening WIP 100 Normal loss 15
Input 1,500β Output 1,250
Closing WIP 200
1,600 1,600
150 units
Or from the normal loss figure = = 1,500 units
0·1
(b)
Statement of equivalent Total Material Conversion
units costs
Opening WIP (to complete) 100 – 70
= 100 × 70% = 100 × 70%
Units started and finished β 1,150 1,150 1,150
Output 1,250
Normal loss 150 – –
Closing WIP 200 200 80
= 200 × 10% = 200 × 10%
1,350 1,300
(c)
Costs incurred in period Materials Conversion
costs
£ £
3,510 1,950
= 1,350 × 2·60 = 1,300 × £1·50
Add scrap proceeds from 300
normal loss = 150 × £2
3,810 1,950
13
Part 1 examination – Part 1.2
Financial Information for Management Marking Scheme
Marks
1 (a) Noting Jim’s wages for 1998 1/
2
Calculating the figure for 1999 1/
2
Calculating the figure for 2000 1/
2
Calculating the figure for 2001 1/
2
— 2
(b) Calculating the wage figures adjusted for the RPI for:
1998 1/
2
1999 1/
2
2000 1/
2
2001 1/
2
15
Marks
2 Calculation of relevant cost for material V 1/
2
Explanation of historic cost as sunk 1/
2
Explanation of relevant cost being opportunity cost relating
to lost scrap proceeds 1/
2
16
Marks
4 (a) Using the correct formula 1/
2
Using an interest rate of 1% 1/
2
Using n = 120 time periods 1/
2
Putting numbers into formula and generating a solution 1/
2
Compounding forward for an extra 5 years 1/
2
Using correct rate of 15% 1/
2
––– 3
17