Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Section A
11 D
12 C
13 C
14 D
15 B
16 C
17 D
18 C
19 C
10 B
11 B
12 D
13 A
14 D
15 A
16 C
17 A
18 C
19 C
20 D
21 D
22 A
23 B
24 A
25 D
1 D
3 C £
Marginal costing profit 37,500
Add: fixed costs in closing stock
(350 × 4) 11,400
Less: fixed costs in opening stock
(100 × 4) 1,1(400)
–––––––
Absorption costing profit 38,500
–––––––
4 D
5 B
Receipts and issues
Units Price per unit Cost
100 5·00 500
150 5.50 825
–––– –––– ––––––
250 5·30 1,325
(100) 5·30 (530)
100 6·00 600
–––– –––– ––––––
250 5·58 1,395
(75) 5·58 (418·5)
–––– –––– ––––––
175 5·58 976·50
–––– –––– ––––––
19
6 C
1·00512×5 – 1
A ––––––––––– = 7,000
0·005
A A × 69·77 = 7,000
7,000
A A = –––––– = 100·33 ≈ 100
69·77
7 D Materials
Usage 7,200 × 3 kg = 21,600 kg
kg
Usage 21,600
Opening stock (400)
Closing stock 500
–––––––
Purchases 21,700
–––––––
8 C
9 C
11 B
383
IRR = 10% + ––––––––––– (15% – 10%)
383 – (– 246)
383
IRR = 10% + –––––––––– × 5%
383 + 246
383
IRR = 10% + –––– × 5%
629
12 D conversion costs
Output 9,850
Closing stock 135 = 450 × 30%
–––––
9,985
–––––
13 A
20
14 D 300
y OF
200
C
B
100
A D
OF
17 A
18 C Volume variance
Budgeted volume 10,000 units
Actual volume 9,800 units
–––––––––––
Difference 200 units
At standard profit per unit × £5
Variance £1,000 adverse
fixed costs
19 C Breakeven sales revenue = –––––––––
C/S ratio
Fixed costs = £200,000 – £50,000 = £150,000
£200,000
C/S ratio = ––––––––– = 0·4
£500,000
£150,000
Breakeven sales revenue = ––––––––– = £375,000
0·4
21
20 D
Time Flow Discount Present
factor value
£000 8% £000
0 (20,000) 1 (20,000)
1–4 13,000 3·312 19,936
5·747 – 3·312=
5–8 17,000 2·435 17,045
10 (10,000) 0·463 (4,630)
Net Present Value 12,351
21 D
22 A £
Over absorbed fixed production overheads (6,000)
Absorbed overheads
(4,500 × £8) 36,000
–––––––
Actual overheads incurred 30,000
24 A
25 D Rate variance £
Did cost 176,000
Should cost
(14,000 × £10) 140,000
––––––––
36,000 adverse
Efficiency variance hours
Did take 14,000
Should take
(5,500 × 3) 16,500
–––––––
2,500 favourable
At standard cost × £10
£25,000 favourable
–––––––––––––––––
22
Section B
1 (a) Centre 1 Centre 2 Service A Service B Service C
2,000 3,500 300 500 700
500 × 50% = 500 × 20% = 500 × 20% = 500 × 10% =
250 100 100 (500) 50
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
2,250 3,600 400 0 750
400 × 45% = 400 × 45% = 400 × 10% =
180 180 (400) 40
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
2,430 3,780 0 40 750
750 × 60% = 750 × 40% =
450 300 (750)
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
2,880 4,080 0 40 0
40 × 50% = 20 40 × 20% = 8 40 × 20% = 8 (40) 40 × 10% = 4
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
2,900 4,088 8 0 4
8 × 45% = 4 8 × 45% = 4 (8) 8 × 10% = 0
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
2,904 4,092 0 0 4
4 × 60% = 2 4 × 40% = 2 (4)
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
2,906 4,094 0 0 0
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
The total amount for overheads in production centre 1 is £2,906 and in production centre 2 is £4,094.
(b) Centre 1
The most appropriate basis is to use machine hours as it is machine intensive.
£2,906
Overhead absorption rate = –––––––––– = £0·969/machine hour
3,000 hours
2 (a) (i)
£
Total revenue
Costs and
revenue
Total costs
Break-even
revenue Variable costs
Fixed costs
0
Breakeven units
volume
(ii) Contribution would be established by taking the difference between the sales revenue line and the variable costs line.
23
(b) (i)
Profit
Profit
£
Breakeven point
0
Units
Loss
£
Fixed costs
(ii) Contribution would be established by taking the difference between profit and fixed costs.
(b) The sales price variance will have arisen due to a higher selling price than budgeted being obtained.
The material variance may have arisen either because the number of kg used were more than expected, and/or the amount
paid per kg was higher than expected.
24
2CoD
4 (a) EOQ =
Ch
(c) Discounts are likely to increase the EOQ as the holding cost will be reduced.
Since the purchase price is lower the total purchase cost will be reduced.
As the order cost uses the EOQ to divide the total demand, this cost will be reduced as the EOQ has increased.
The holding cost will change as it uses both the increased EOQ and a reduced purchase price.
MR ≥ MC at 1,300 units, therefore profits will be maximised at this point which is a selling price of £45.
25
Part 1 Examination – Paper 1.2
Financial Information for Management December 2003 Marking Scheme
Marks
Section A
2 marks per question giving a total of 50 marks.
Section B
1 (a) reapportionment
1 mark for each correct line using correct %’s max 6
Note: any method with sound bases for allocation
should be accepted and given full credit.
Conclusion 1
––– 7
27
Marks
3 (a) Flexed budget
Sales units 1/
2
Production units 1/
2
Sales revenue 1/
2
Material cost 1/
2
Labour cost 1/
2
Fixed cost 1/
2
Closing stock 1
Actual figures – all of them 1
Variances
Sales revenue 1/
2
Material cost 1/
2
Labour cost 1/
2
Fixed cost 1/
2
––– 7
28