Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
In this issue:
1) The Retail Investor
2) Long Equity Managers
3) Fundamental Hedge Funds
4) Short-term Equity Traders
5) Quants
From the “Invisible Hand” to the “Rational Actor”, the “Electronic Herd”, or
just the monolithic “Market”, we tend to think of asset prices as being driven
by a uniform force. In reality, there are many different types of investors
and traders who push and pull prices in myriad ways. The battle between
these actors creates inefficiencies and profitable opportunities. I’ll discuss
the most important market players and how their actions create distinct
waves in asset prices. A rough estimate of the relative trading volumes:
1) The Retail Investor
The backbone of the stock market is the passive retail investor. Many people
buy stock every year without giving much thought to valuation. Through the
employer’s 401k, pension fund, or by consistent mutual fund purchases, these
investors provide a relatively steady tailwind to the market. When the
economy is doing well and they are optimistic, they invest more. During
severe recessions they may produce net withdrawals. Even when their money
is professionally managed by someone with great discretion, it tends to be
invested in a way that is 100% long the market, and very diversified. When
these investors pour money into the market, the result is an indiscriminate
rally that will lead to the overvaluation of some weak companies that are
simply getting swept along. This causes the market truism, “a rising tide lifts
all boats.” Over a 5+year horizon, their contributions will be influenced by the
public attitude towards stocks and bonds in general. For example, for 20
years after the great depression, the American Public believed that stocks were
inherently risky and unsuitable for most investors. Over a 10+ year horizon,
contributions are also greatly influenced by demographics. As more
Americans near retirement age, net investment into the stock market as a
percentage of income will decrease. It’s also worth noting that passive
investors are still relatively geographically isolated; American investors drive
American stock market prices, and German investors drive German
prices. Over the long term, the valuation of a large country’s stock market is
primarily determined by passive investors.
To take advantage of opportunities created by the passive investor, we want
to identify when they make poor choices. The simplest example is the passive
investor’s exaggerated response to crisis. During a major war, recession, or
natural disaster, public sentiment is likely to become extremely pessimistic. If
the market has already sold off by as much as you think appropriate for the
actual risks, it’s time to prepare for a contrarian trade. Similarly, we know
that a young country with a growing economy will have a tremendous tailwind
from a continuous flow of new earnings into the equity market. In the absence
of a crisis, stock prices are likely to continue to rise regardless of valuation. As
long as valuations are not obviously too high, we can ride the tailwind.
5) Quants
The last player in the equity game are “black box” hedges funds or “quants",
and they represent about 70% of the trading volume. These traders program
computer algorithms to trade in a time frame measured in microseconds to
minutes. They immediately exploit simple arbitrages and use complex models
to try to predict the actions of other market participants and jump ahead of
them. For example, a computer program will notice that every 5 seconds,
there is a purchase of 1000 shares of Microsoft stock. The program will
purchase 10,000 shares and then sell the shares to the original purchaser
every 5 seconds at a higher price. The quants make many basic
mistakes. They overweight simple historical data and frequently fail to
consider changing circumstances. For example, their programmers will
estimate the impact of a good GDP number on stocks by looking at the impact
of GDP reports over the last 10 years. However, they will likely fail to consider
more subtle variables like current valuation levels, market sentiment, open
stock option interest etc. Every once in a while, quants make eggregious, even
comical errors. For example, during the “flash crash” of May 6th, 2010,
quants sold the stocks of several large companies at $0.01.
It’s difficult to exploit quants unless you have access to similar
technology. Even when the quants make eggregious mistakes, they are
generally protected by the exchanges; the NYSE cancelled the trades in which
the quants sold stock at $0.01. We can at least be mindful of their market
impact. While quants are frequently thought of as “liquidity providers” in that
they are constantly making markets and trade great volume, they become
“liquidity takers” when the market is strongly trending. This means that a
market with a high volume of quant trading is much more likely to experience
a “flash crash.”
Risk over Reward: A conversation about intelligent investing – we discuss the nature of
risk and uncertainty, macroeconomics, security valuation, and how to think about
markets and invest profitably - http://www.riskoverreward.com/