Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at .
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=rsl. .
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
The Royal Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Philosophical
Transactions: Biological Sciences.
http://www.jstor.org
rll THE ROYAL
i2l SOCIETY
Trichobothria are cuticular filiform hairs of arachnids, which respond to air movements. In the
wandering spider, Cupienniussalei, about 900 trichobothria form characteristic groups on the pedipalps
and legs and are used to detect and localize flying insect prey. We analyse the response of the receptor
cells of metatarsal trichobothria of different lengths (200-800 ,im) to both natural and synthetic stimuli
to understand what the single receptor can contribute to the detection of natural signals. (i) The receptor
cells are not spontaneously active. Their response to hair deflection is strictly phasic. The airflow
produced by a tethered flying fly (Calliphorasp.) elicits a physiological response up to a distance of 55 cm.
The response strength, however, strongly depends on the orientation and position of the fly. The receptor
cells encode a wide range of airflow velocities (lmms-1 to lms-1). The time-course and frequency
content of the strongly fluctuating air movements characterizing a fly signal are well represented in the
spiking pattern of the receptor cells. There is almost no adaptation to a broad-band noise stimulus but
strong adaptation to monofrequency stimulation. The presence of a platform below the spider (corre-
sponding to its dwelling plant) strongly enhances the response of the trichobothrium due to its
'amplifying' effect on flow velocity. Without the platform, the sensory space of the trichobothrium
decreases from 55 cm to 15 cm. (ii) With the hair directly coupled to the stimulating device, threshold
curves do not depend on hair length (200-800 [im). Physiologically and irrespective of their length, the
trichobothria are all broadly tuned to a frequency range between about 50 and 100 Hz where threshold
deflection angles are ca. 0.1? and sometimes as small as 0.01?. This contrasts the length dependence of the
mechanical frequency tuning of trichobothria. Above threshold the bandpass characteristics of the cell
reponse is much more pronounced than at threshold. (iii) Due to their low thresholds, their tuning and
the highly phasic character of their response, the receptor cells of the trichobothria are well suited to
detect and encode air particle movements produced by flying prey. Low-frequency background air move-
ments (wind) are filtered by both the mechanical and the physiological properties of the trichobothria.
Phil. Trans.R. Soc.Lond.B (1999) 354, 183-192 183 ? 1999 The Royal Society
Received30 June 1997 Accepted 9 September 1997
184 F. G. Barth and A. H6ller Responseofspidertrichobothriato naturalstimuli
(a) I'l
60
40
o(A3 ......
.....
oO,
20
x
0 (b)
60 v no platformpresent
0 platformpresent
mean velocity, rms [m s-1]
Figure 2. Representation of mean flow velocity (filled circles) 40
and degree of fluctuation (rms) (open squares) of a fly signal
by the AP rate of the receptor cells (for details refer to text).
The lines are the first order regressions for the relations 20
between action potential rate and the logarithm of flow *
0' ..
velocity and its degree of fluctuation (rms). The steeper slope 'V.
Q.
of the solid line suggests that the trichobothrium (length, 0
1=500 gm) is more sensitive to the degree of turbulence than
to the mean velocity of a flow field. N= 1, n = 31. 10 20 30 40 50
The sensory cells are not spontaneously active; they horizontaldistancex [cm]
generate spikes only in response to the deflection of the
hair shaft. Figure 3. (a) Distance and position parameters varied in the
experiments on the active space of a trichobothrium with
Figure lb shows a typical response of a trichobothrial
respect to a tethered flying fly. (b) Influence of a solid
sensory cell to the instantaneous airflow velocity substrate beneath the spider on the size of the active space of a
representing the fly signal at the site of the trichobo- trichobothrium (I= 500 gm). At a vertical distance z of 5 cm
thrium and 5 cm away from the fly. After an initial phasic the horizontal distance x was varied between 5 cm and 50 cm.
peak of the response, the time-course of the fly signal is The presence of the plate beneath the spider leg strongly
well represented in the spiking pattern of the receptor enhances the response of the trichobothrium. AP, action
cells. Both the mean velocity and the degree of turbulence potentials; JV=2, n=9; filled triangles, no platform present;
(rms) of the flow field are represented logarithmically by open circles, platform present.
the trichobothrium over a range from 1mm s-1 to 1m s-1
(figure 2). The steeper slope of the line representing the entails an increase in flow velocity (Barth et al. 1995)
correlation between action potential rate and the loga- dramatically increases the response of the trichobothria
rithm of the rms (figure 2) suggests that the receptor is to the prey signal. With the plate present, a fly pointing
more sensitive to the degree of turbulence than to the away from the spider still elicits a physiological response
mean flow velocity of the fly signal. This effect increases of the examined trichobothrium at a distance of 55 cm.
with increasing distance of the fly from the spider due to Without the spider platform this distance decreases to
an increasing breakdown of the continuous nature of the 15 cm (figure 3b). In contrast to a web spider, the presence
air currents generated by the fly. of a solid substrate is typical for a hunting spider such as
Cupienniussalei. All following experiments were therefore
(i) Sensoryspace carried out with the platform present.
How far away can a fly be detected by a single
trichobothrium? To quantify the sensory space of a (ii) Positionoffly
trichobothrium with respect to the air movement The main air movement signal produced by a fly is
produced by a flying fly, we varied the position of the fly highly directional and contained in a cone-like region
relative to the spider by changing the following para- directed downwards from the fly at an angle of about
meters (figure 3a): absolute distance (x'), horizontal 25-45? (Barth et al. 1995). Therefore, besides the absolute
distance (x) and vertical distance (z) between the fly's distance between the fly and the trichobothrium, the
prosoma and the trichobothrium, and the lateral distance position of the trichobothrium relative to this cone of
(y) between the long axis of the spider leg and the long directed airflow determines the strength of the response.
axis of the fly. The angle of the fly's position relative to Figure 4a shows the results of an experiment where the
the trichobothrium was defined as the angle (a). The long horizontal distance (x) was varied between 5 cm and 50 cm
axis of the fly was always kept parallel to the long axis of at two vertical distances (z). At a vertical distance of 2 cm
the spider's leg and horizontal. the response is strongest at the nearest horizontal distance
The presence of a solid substrateat the level of the spider (5 cm). At a vertical distance of 9 cm, however, the
leg (instead of the leg protruding freely into space), which response is strongest at a horizontal distance of 10cm.
These results can be understood by considering the shape deflected in the direction of the long axis of the leg (i.e. in
and position of the flow field generated by the fly (figure the direction of greatest mechanical sensitivity; Barth et
4a). As the fly moves from position A (x =5 cm, z =9 cm) al. 1993) with a constant velocity of 26.5?s-1. The deflec-
to position B (x=10cm, z=9cm), the trichobothrium tion angle was varied between 3.6 and 10.6? (figure 7).
becomes further embedded in the 'flow cone'. In figure 4b The receptor shows a phasic response. There is no sponta-
the angle a was kept constant and the absolutedistance of neous activity and no activity during steady deflection
thefly (x') varied between 5 and 35 cm. In this case, the (hair at fixed angular location). The total number of
trichobothrium stayed within the flow cone at all action potentials increases with increasing deflection
distances. The spiking rate decreased gradually with angle. The mean frequency of the response, however,
increasing distance following the decrease of average air decreases with increasing deflection angle, suggesting that
particle velocity which measured 0.56 m s-1 ? 0.08 s.d., at the trichobothrium not only responds to the velocity, but
x' = 5cm, but only 0.08ms-1 + 0.14 s.d., at x'=30cm also to the acceleration of hair deflection.
(JV=2, n=8). It should be noted here that in addition to
the average air particle velocity, the spectrum of frequen- (ii) Thresholdcurves
cies contained in the fly signal changes dramatically with The determination of stimulus thresholds at various
distance. As seen by the example presented in figure 5, frequencies might help to answer the question of whether
high-frequency components are disappearing rapidly. At a single trichobothrium preferentially responds to a rele-
a distance of 25 cm there are practically no frequencies vant prey signal as opposed to background air movements
above 50 Hz any more. By increasing the distance (y) which are known to be very low-frequency phenomena
between the long axis of the fly and the long axis of the (< 10 Hz; Barth et al. 1995).
spider leg from 0-llcm, with the fly forming a constant To describe the threshold frequency response of tricho-
angle (a) of 40?, the spiking rate again dramatically bothria receptor cells without having to consider the
decreased (figure 4c) as the trichobothrium moved out of mechanical air-hair interaction and boundary layer
the flow cone. effects, measurements were made with the hairs directly
All experiments described so far were carried out with coupled to the vibrator. Responses were recorded from all
the fly's abdomen pointing towards the trichobothrium. five hairs of the metatarsal group Dl between 10 and
When the orientation of the fly was reversed, with the 750 Hz. The hairs were moved symmetrically around
flow field pointing away from the spider, the response of the their resting position in the direction of the leg axis. The
trichobothrium is much weaker and could only be elicited threshold decreases from 0.5?, at 10 Hz, to 0.1?, at 100 Hz,
up to a distance of 10 cm. The action potential (AP) and then slowly rises again at higher frequencies (figure
frequency measured 40 AP s-' (NV=2, n =10) and 5 AP s-1 8a). The smallest deflection angle found was 0.01? at a
(JN=l, n=6) at 5cm distance (ac=40?) with the fly stimulus frequency of 100 Hz. With the hair directly
abdomen pointing towards and away from the fly, respec- coupled to the vibrator, threshold curves do not signifi-
tively. For x'=10 cm the corresponding values were 23 cantly change with hair length (figure 8b). When plotting
and lAPs-1. We attribute these responses to the airflow peak velocity (degs-1) at threshold instead of deflection
towards the fly produced by the wingbeat. angle, the trichobothria clearly present themselves as low-
With increasing horizontal distance of the fly, the air pass filters, with high sensitivity at frequencies up to
movement signal not only becomes weaker but also ca. 100 Hz and steeply rising thresholds beyond.
increasingly discontinuous. Figure 6a shows the air Under natural conditions, however, trichobothria are
particle velocity measured at a distance (x) of 30 cm and deflected by air particle movements. For comparison with
the corresponding response of the trichobothrium. At the values found with direct coupling of the hair shaft to
large distances the fly signal consists of single gusts of air, the vibrator, threshold curves were therefore also deter-
thus diminishing the probability of the trichobothrium to mined for sinusoidal stimulation of the trichobothria in
be exposed to the stimulus. In figure 6b (same experiment the nearfield of a loudspeaker. Here, because of the added
as in figure 4a) the response of the trichobothrium is influence of the mechanical properties of the hairs and
given as the highest spike rate that occurred. The percent- the hair-air interaction (Barth et al. 1993; Humphrey et
ages quantify the probability of a response to a stimulus al. 1993), threshold curves do indeed depend on hair
resulting from Is of flight activity. At distances larger length (figure 9). At a stimulus frequency of 10 Hz a hair
than 30cm the instantaneous spike rate drops from of 500 ptm length is twice as sensitive as a hair 250 ltm
several hundred to below 50 Hz and the response prob- long. The longer hair is more sensitive in the low-
ability from 100% to 40%. frequency range, whereas the shorter hair is more
sensitive in the high-frequency range. With nearfield
(b) Response to synthetic stimuli stimulation all trichobothria investigated behave like
Using the fly as a source of a natural stimulus, the strong high-pass filters for frequencies above ca. 25 Hz.
stimulus parameters we could vary were distance, abso-
lute position and relative orientation of the fly to the (iii) Suprathresholdfrequency
response
spider. To investigate further the response properties of Most of the time trichobothria will not operate at
the receptor we applied synthetic stimuli, which allowed threshold under natural conditions. To determine the
us to control the single parameters of hair motion. suprathreshold frequency tuning for a trichobothrium
directly coupled to the vibrator, the stimulation frequency
(i) Rampstimuli was varied between 10 and 300 Hz at a constant stimulus
Does the trichobothrium 'measure' the position, the amplitude of 2 mm s- (stimulus duration Is). When the
velocity or the acceleration of the hair shaft? Hairs were response frequency is plotted against stimulation
5 o - A
0- 0-
0 5 10 15 0 5 10 15
x [cm] x [cm]
40 - 80
z=2cm
T- T T -= 40?
tl 660-
-,20- T ? i
* ? - -
o--
0- 0 . S T
40- 20-
-l/)
< 20 - T0-
iT 0 10 20 30 40
0 10 20 30 40 50
horizontaldistance x [cm]
(c) 10- A
B
S 5_ /F R
Figure 4. Response of a
/ /
L-Jt?1YW~~~~~~~~~ ~~trichobothrium (1= 500,tm) to the
flow field of a tethered flying fly.
(a) Increasing horizontal distance x
at two vertical distances z. Upper
0O- , figure shows the position of the
c ./
1l_ ". ^ . 10
....... flow cone at different horizontal
l,/
10 .4 distances. V= 1, n= 8. (b)
y ?0 0 Increasing absolute distance x'
[ 0c
at a constant angle a of 40?. In
addition to the response of the
trichobothrium (solid line), the
lower panel also shows the mean
velocity of the fly signal (dotted
30 a = 40? line) at different distances. Upper
~figure T
T~_ "~~~~~~~~~~ shows the position of the
4 4 4 4
20-+*~~~~~~~~ flow cone at different distances.
_ ~ V= 2, n= 10. (c) Increasing lateral
I- distancey at a constant angle a of
? - I 40? and a constant distance x of
10- rTn T10cm.
l Upper figure shows the
I
position of the flow cone at
0- I
different distances. AP, action
0
~~~potentials. ~~~~~~~~~~~~- V= 1, n= 6. (For
0-~.5 I . ,. .' . 'I
I I ' 10 details refer to text.)
0 5 10
(a)
IC)
E
Q
30
11 l I . . 1.
~~?~~?~*1?~
?II.*YIWVV*Y_~~~~~~L?LI_Y?-?IYU??~~~~~~~Y-LL?-~~~U
20
x'[cm] s . I -
III
I]
15
0. (b)
E 0.5
z =9 cm
800
100 % 100 %
600 1100% O00^
-1 5 N 100 %
0 200 400
frequency [Hz]
400 _ +
Figure 5. Frequency spectra of the air movement caused by a 200
tethered flying fly and measured at increasing distance (x'). ~40% 40%
0
I I I ,II I
0.8 _ (a)
00
0.6 -
a)
(I ,
a 0.4
iI 0
C)
-*
0)
7c: 0.2
0
tr--:
0.0 -
lI. . , . II
II IIt a? . I A I I.I I
10 100 1000
frequency[Hz]
1' I I' I 11
0.8 (b) 10 Hz
0
-
I I I . 1,lI
0.4
_it
0.0
I- I J I iI
0.8 100 Hz
I' I II" a
0)
t:m
200 ms
0.4
Figure 7. Response of a trichobothrium (1= 500 ,um) to linear aac
deflection of the hair shaft from its resting position in proximal 0)
direction. Upper traces, deflection of the hair shaft; lower 0
0.0
traces, APs.
0.8
500 Hz
100
100
E 80
10
=s,
...........................
60
a
ct
c)
._
i_
1 40
Pi
5t
20
I I II I I I, I I I1 I I I I I 111I
0.1
10 100 1000 0
frequency [Hzl
60 (iii) Recognitionoffly
-? ? I How does the spider discriminate the fly signal from
40 I.?...oa background wind? A closer look at the corresponding
'signals' seems to provide at least a partial answer.
The wingbeat of a flying insect produces sound waves
20 ?, b??.
, ...-.!
: (in addition to 'wind') that lead to periodic pressure
,"' variations and particle displacements in the vicinity of
l. ' "
0 . I. the insect. Because of their small size and their relatively
, ,. ..I...I
1 10 low wingbeat frequencies flying insects are rather poor
maximumstimulusvelocity [mm s-1] sound pressure radiators (Tautz 1979). Air particle
displacements, however, can reach relatively large
Figure 11. Representation of stimulus amplitude (deflection
velocity) by a trichobothrium (/=500 tm) directly coupled to amplitudes close to a flying insect. A tethered flying fly
the vibrator. Stimulation frequency was kept constant at produces airflow velocities of up to ms - with rms
50Hz. N= 1, n=6. values of up to 25%. Background wind measured in the
habitat of Cupiennius under biologically relevant condi-
tions is characterized by velocities typically below
monofrequencystimulation
0.1 m s-1 with rms values below 15% (Barth et al. 1995). In
10 Hz
addition, the frequency content of the two 'signals' differs
~a_|-__- u *- remarkably. Whereas the fly signal contains frequencies
Illlllll
11I11111111111111111111111111111 I up to 150 Hz, the wind in the natural habitat is character-
ized by frequencies below 10 Hz. The experiments of the
present study using synthetic stimuli revealed that the
s trains of APs sent to the central nervous system by a
trichobothrium depend on the parameters mentioned
N 100 Hz above and contain the information needed for the discri-
mination task discussed. The threshold curves and, even
W) I more so, the response curves above threshold measured in
- _------I
H IIII 1II 111111 I the present study point to a tuning of the examined
trichobothria to the frequency range relevant for prey
capture behaviour. At distances of the fly greater than
IS ca. 25cm, however, the fly signal increasingly lacks its
characteristic features, with all the high frequency
components (>50Hz) gone. Interestingly, behavioural
reactions can no longer be elicited at such distances
(Barth et al. 1995). Even if the spider recognized the air
noise stimulus 0-400 Hz
movement as that produced by a fly passing at some
distance it would not make sense for the spider to try to
catch the fly because of the time it would take it to
Il.
:IIiirl,NU;1a Ill II II1111I IIII I111111111
111111 I11111111111
H 1 II 111-II11
-I ,I approach the fly and because of the long delay in the fly
signals reaching the spider to begin with (several seconds
at distances of ca. 30 cm).
10s
(iv) Stimulusfrequency
Figure 12. Adaptation of a trichobothrium directly coupled Trichobothria of different length are mechanically
to the vibrator to different kinds of stimuli. Upper traces, AP tuned to different ranges of best frequencies. This finding
rate histogram (bin width = 100 ms); middle traces, APs; can be understood by taking boundary layer phenomena
lower traces, stimuli. into account (Barth et al. 1993; Humphrey et al. 1993).
However, threshold curves do not depend on hair length
of the trichobothrium is strongest when it is in the centre 11
I when the hair is directly coupled to the vibrator. The
of the cone. When the position of the fly is changed so 'physiological' tuning obviously does not add to the
that the trichobothrium falls out of the cone, the response I mechanical tuning in a hair length-specific way. The
immediately decreases. This effect is stronger than that ofF physiological threshold curves lack any sharp tuning.
increasing absolute distance (x') between fly and tricho- Similar to the mechanical tuning, the 3dB range of
bothrium. From behavioural observations we conclude I maximum sensitivity is rather broad.
that the spider is able to use the corresponding differences At suprathreshold stimulation the receptor cells show a
in the excitation pattern of its many trichobothria to pronounced tuning to a frequency range between 50 and
exactly localize the fly. 120 Hz. This is well within the range of the frequencies
contained in the air movements close to flying insects. Brittinger,W. 1998 Trichobothrien,Medienstr6mungenund das
Low-frequency background air movements such as wind Orientierungsverhatten von Jagdspinnen (Cupienniussalei
are effectively filtered already in the sensory periphery. Keys). PhD thesis, University of Vienna.
Due to the different mechanical frequency tuning of Christian, U. 1971 Zur Feinstruktur der Trichobothrien der
trichobothria of different length, the spider might be able Winkelspinne Tegenaria derhami (Scopoli) (Agelenidae,
to detect the frequency content of an airborne signal. Araneae). Cytobiologie 4, 172-185.
Dickinson, M. H. & Gotz, K. G. 1997 The wake dynamics and
flight forces of the fruit fly Drosophilamelanogaster.
J. Exp. Biol.
(v) Stimulusamplitude 199, 2085-2104.
The amplitude of the airflow generated by a buzzing Friedel,T. & Barth, F. G. 1997 Wind-sensitive interneuronesin
fly is encoded by the spiking rate of the trichobothria the spider CNS (Cupienniussalei). Directional information
receptor cells over a wide range of velocities (1 mms-1 to processing of sensory inputs from trichobothria on the
lms-l). With sine wave stimulation, increasing stimulus walking legs. 7. Comp.Physiol.A 180, 223-233.
amplitude leads to a logarithmic increase of the AP rate Gorner, P. 1965 A proposed transducing mechanism for a
at stimulus frequencies below 150 Hz. At stimulus frequen- multiply-innervated mechanoreceptor (trichobothrium) in
cies above 150 Hz there is always just one spike per cycle spiders. ColdSpring HarborSymp. Quant. Biol. 30, 69-73.
Gorner, P. & Andrews, P. 1969 Trichobothrien,ein Ferntastsinn
regardless of stimulus amplitude. This frequency is high bei Webspinnen (Araneen).Z. Vergl.Physiol.64, 301-317.
compared to that of the receptor cell of caterpillar filiform Harris, D. J. & Mill, P.J. 1977Observationson the leg receptors
hairs (Barathra) where the frequency limit of amplitude of Ciniflo (Araneida, Dictynidae). I. External mechano-
representation is around 40 Hz (Tautz 1978). Since the receptors.J. Comp.Physiol.A 119, 37-54.
natural fly signal contains frequencies typically below Hoffmann, C. 1967 Bau und Funktion der Trichobothrienvon
200 Hz, the trichobothria receptor cells are well suited to EuscorpiuscarpathicusL. . Vergl.Physiol. 54, 290-352.
represent accurately the velocity of natural air currents. Humphrey, J. A. C., Devarakonda, R., Iglesias, J. & Barth,
F. G. 1993 Dynamics of arthropod filiform hairs. I.
Mathematical modelling of the hair and air motions. Phil.
Supported by the Austrian Science Foundation (grant P9336- Trans.R. Soc. Lond. B 340, 423-444.
BIO to F.G.B.).We thankJ. A. C. Humphrey for his comments Humphrey, J. A. C., Devarakonda, R., Iglesias, J. & Barth,
on the manuscript,J. Halbritter for help with the preparationof F. G. 1997, 1998 Errata. Phil. Trans.R. Soc.Lond.B352, 1995,
the figures and M. Wieser for secretarial assistance. 353, 2163.
Lachmuth, U., Grasshoff,M. & Barth, F. G. 1981Taxonomische
Revision der Gattung CupienniusSimon 1891 (Arachnida,
REFERENCES
Araneae), Senck.Biol. 65, 329-372.
Anton, S. 1991 Zentrale Projektionen von Mechano- und ReiBland, A. 1978 Electrophysiology of trichobothria in orb-
Chemorezeptoren bei der Jagdspinne Cupienniussalei Keys. weaving spiders (Agelenidae, Aranea).J. Comp.Physiol.A 123,
PhD thesis, University of Vienna. 71-84.
Barth, F. G., Seyfarth, E.-A., Bleckmann, H. & Schiich,W. 1988 ReiBland, A. & Gorner, P. 1985 Trichobothria.In Neurobiology of
Spiders of the genus CupienniusSIMON 1891 (Araneae, arachnids(ed. F. G. Barth), pp. 138-161. Berlin, Heidelberg,
Ctenidae). I. Range distribution, dwelling plants, and New Yorkand Tokyo:Springer.
climatic characteristicsof the habitats. Oecologia77, 187-193. Shimozawa, T. & Kanou, M. 1984 The aerodynamics and
Barth, F. G., Wastl, U., Humphrey,J. A. C. & Devarakonda, R. sensory physiology of range fractionationin the cercal filiform
1993 Dynamics of arthropod filiform hairs. II. Mechanical sensilla of the cricket Gryllusbimaculatus.J. Comp.Phyisol.
properties of spider trichobothria (Cupienniussalei KEYS.). A 155, 495-505.
Phil. Trans.R. Soc.Lond.B 340, 445-461. Tautz,J. 1978 Reception of medium vibration by thoracal hairs
Barth, F G., Humphrey, J. A. C., Wastl, U., Halbritter, J. & of caterpillars of Barathrabrassicae(Lepidoptera, Noctuidae).
Brittinger, W. 1995 Dynamics of arthropod filiform hairs. II. Response characteristics of the sensory cell. J. Comp.
III. Flow patterns related to air movement detection in a Physiol. A 125, 67-77.
spider (Cupiennius salei Keys.). Phil. Trans.R. Soc. Lond. B 347, Tautz,J. 1979 Reception of particle oscillation in a medium-an
397-412. unorthodox sensory capacity.Naturwissenschaften 66, 452-461.