Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Michael-Menten Approach
Enzymatic reaction
Simplest enzymatic reaction 1st order
(1)
1
The reaction will start at a high
rate and slow down over time
for several reasons:
The substrate will be used up
and the reaction rate will slow
down as each enzyme
molecule spends more time
diffusing through the solution
before it collides with a new
substrate molecule.
As the reaction proceeds,
product will accumulate which
may tend to inhibit the
enzyme.
The enzyme molecules may
gradually lose activity owing
to random denaturation.
Graph
Plotting r0 at different [S] & [S] very low a straight line
[E]: graph
r is proportional to [S] when [S] is low, [S] the
(1st-order reaction) limiting factor; an increase [S]
when the [S] is in the low produces a proportional
range increase in the rate
2
graph will curve at higher the enzyme becomes
[S] & will level off at very "saturated" and the
high [S] reaction rate reaches a
The rate does not constant value doesn't
depend on the [S] when increase significantly as
the [S] is high yet more substrate is
Reaction rate changes added.
gradually from first order
to zero order as [S] is
increased.
[S] increases, [E] the
limiting factor
a further increase in
substrate produces a
less than-proportional
increase in reaction rate.
ENZYME KINETICS
deals with the rate of enzyme reaction
Rate (r), activity, dP/dt, (-dS/dt) how fast an
enzyme catalyses S to P, the amount of S
consumed, or P formed per unit time
Rate ? need S or P, & t
how reaction is affected by various chemical and
physical conditions
The rate equations calculating reaction time,
yields
For designing bioreactor and optimum economic
condition
3
Factors affecting the rate of enzyme
reaction
[S]
the more, the quicker the enzyme molecules collide and
bind with them). expressed in the unit of “molarity”, M
T
As the T rises, molecular motion speed up collisions
between enzyme and substrate. Finite enzymes are
proteins, have an upper limit beyond which the enzyme
becomes denatured and ineffective.
inhibitors
a. Competitive inhibitors
b. Noncompetitive inhibitors
pH
The conformation of a protein is influenced by pH and as
enzyme activity is crucially dependent on its conformation,
its activity is likewise affected.
Rate vs [S]
• [S] low they are all bound to
the enzyme molecules
• there are more substrate
molecules some of them are
free in solution, not bound to an
enzyme molecule.
• [S] high all the enzyme
molecules have a bound
substrate.
• The number of enzyme molecules
with bound substrate is an
indication of the reaction rate
those enzymes "act" and convert
the substrate to product.
• The purple highlight indicates the
region of the graph that
corresponds to illustration in the
left.
4
Henry (1902) observed Assumptions:
this & proposed: 1. The total enzyme
(2) concentration constant
during the reaction; [Eo] =
[ES]+[E]
rmax & Km kinetic
parameters, 2. The enzyme is very small
experimentally determined amount compared to the
Brown (1902) “E forms a amount of substrate the
complex with S. The formation of the complex
complex then breaks down does not significantly deplete
to the products, the substrate.
regenerates free enzymes
(3) 3. [P] is so low that product
inhibition may be considered
(4) negligible
MICHAEL-MENTEN APPROACH
Assumption for MM approach:
most enzymes has a fairly simple math shape
a hyperbola
product release step (4) is much slower than
reversible reaction (3)
ES complex has a weak interaction fast
reaction; much faster step than product release
step which involved chemical changes
the slowest step determine the rate, the other is
at equilibrium
eventhough enzyme is soluble in water, enzyme
molecules have large & complicated 3D structure
5
If slower reaction (4) determines overall reaction rate of
P formation & S consumption is proportional to CES:
(5)
6
From MM eq
Initial [S] increase reaction [S]=Km rate=one-half of
goes faster; enzymes easier rmax
to find S
[S]<<Km rate depends
All active sites occupied with linearly on [S]; 2x[S] 2x
bound S or P saturated
rate
[S]<<<[Km] double const,
double rate [S]>>Km dependence of
rmax rate approached at rate on [S] approach a
saturated [S]; rate does not max horizontal
depend on [S] line/independent; rmax
Km: [S] required to produce zero order kinetic
rate that is one-half of rmax
Km >> the weaker the
interaction between enzyme &
S
7
Alternate Forms of the MM eq.
Where does KM & rmax if KM is high, the curve will
come in? appear to spread out toward
Estimate Km & rmax the right, approaching Vmax
asymptote only at high substrate
concentration.
Km=f ([S]) Km = rmax/2
Km low corresponds to
tight binding of enzyme to
substrate and vice versa
KM is large the rate at
low [S] is relatively low.
KM is small the rate at
low [S] is relatively high
The curve of r vs [S] rise
quickly if KM is low and the
curve will soon approach
Vmax
8
Lineweaver-Burke plot
•MM eq. converted to a linear
form
•plotting 1/r (y) vs 1/[S] (x)
•called a double reciprocal plot
or alineweaver-burke
•The equation of the line is:
Example
From series of batch runs
with a constant E
concentration, the
following initial rate data
were obtained as a
function of initial S
concentration:
Evaluate MM kinetic
parameters using
Lineweaver-Burk plot (do
not use deviated data
points from the MM model)
9
Data: S< 10mM rmax=0.54
S increase up to l0 mM mM/min & Km=1.78 mM
the rate increased All data rmax=0.45
Further S increases (to mM/min & Km=1, 37 mM
15mM) decreased the
initial reaction rate
may be due to substrate or
product inhibition
MM eq. does not
incorporate the inhibition
effects
10