Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Jonathan West
Introduction
Making meaning of our daily life is probably one of the distinguishing characteristics of
being human. From the early records of cave paintings onwards, there is a plethora of examples of
the continued efforts of humankind striving to better understand and adapt to the changing world
around us. One of the driving forces of adults seeking to understand their world more fully
involves “how to navigate and act on our own purposes, values, feelings, and meanings rather than
those we have uncritically assimilated from others (Mezirow, J., & Associates, 2000, p. 8).
Developing beliefs that are more reliable, examining and confirming their dependability, and
making informed decisions are a basic part of the adult learning process. It is transformative
learning theory that explains this learning process of constructing new and modified
Review of literature
Transformative learning theory has come to prominence in the last 30 years primarily due
to the work of Jack Mezirow (2000, 1997). Mezirow’s study of perspective transformation of
women re-entering college in 1978 provided the foundations for his later publishing works on
transformative learning theory in 1991 and 2000 (Taylor, E., 1998 & 2008). The theory of
construe a new or revised interpretation of the meaning of one’s experience in order to guide future
(Mezirow, 1997). Examples of frames of reference are concepts, values, associations, feelings, and
conditioned responses acquired by an adult that define their world. They are the structures of
BECOMING A TRANSFORMATIVE EDUCATOR
assumptions and expectations that set our direction of action. When opportunities allow,
transformative learners move toward “a frame of reference that is more inclusive, discriminating,
Frames of reference transform through “critical reflection on the assumptions on which our
interpretations, beliefs, and habits of mind or points of view are based” (Mezirow, 1997, p. 7).
Critical reflection can occur when we hear an alternative point of view or self-assess our own
assumptions and beliefs based on prior experience. Mezirow suggests reflection is the process of
integrating present observations and past experience by which we change our minds. The
transformation process can start from a traumatic event or it can be an incremental process, an
accrual of slight modifications in our frames of reference. Mezirow considers that anything that
moves the individual towards a more integrated meaning perspective that is inclusive and open to
other viewpoints contribute to an adult’s development. He also suggests that the practice of
transformative learning is essential to adult development and includes the most significant learning
There have been numerous studies that support Mezirow’s view and confirm the basic principles
and steps Mezirow contends are a part of the transformative learning process. However, there are a
significant number of studies that promote alternate views of transformative learning. Two
alternative views are the psychoanalytical view that views learning as a process of individuation
reflecting on psychic structures and the psychodevelpomental view that considers transformation
across the lifespan in incremental and progressive growth. Taylor (2008) lists four other views of
spiritual, and planetary). These views include intuition, insight, relationships, personality,
(Taylor, E., 1997, 2008). Cranton (2002) explores the implications of teaching using
transformative learning theory and identifies seven facets as a guide to help prepare a learning
alternative viewpoints, engaging in discourse, revising assumptions and perspectives, and acting on
revisions. Edward Taylor (2006) suggests four areas of challenge needing further discussion and
research relative to teaching for transformation: the transformative educator, the transformative
classroom environment, the transformative text, and the transformative learner. Cranton (2002)
suggests that particular teaching strategies cannot assure transformative learning. An argument put
forth in an article, a story told by a class member, or a challenging statement in a lecture can just as
likely kindle critical self-reflection as a carefully fashioned exercise. The environment of challenge
is a key factor that underpins teaching for transformation. In addition, while it is important to
combine challenge with support, safety, and empowerment of the learner at the core, it is a
challenge of assumptions, perspectives, and belief that leads us to question ourselves. Kathleen
Taylor (2006) discusses the findings of research on brain function and the role of emotion in the
learning process and considers the implications for educators seeking to create a transformative
learning environment. Neurobiological research indicates the need for safe and empathic
relationships in order to accomplish the neural reorganization needed in the higher level thinking
Several studies have included the role of the educator in transformative learning. In his
critical review of the empirical research on transformative learning, Taylor (2007)notes that the
BECOMING A TRANSFORMATIVE EDUCATOR
most significant changed he found since a similar review he published in 1998 was the greater
attention given to the practice of fostering transformative learning in a workshop setting or higher
education classroom.
educators that explored both sides of the teaching-learning experience. While investigating
learners’ experiences, barriers, and instructor and organizational responsibilities. King found that
the support and challenge offered by the professor, discussions, personal reflections, readings,
journals, and class activities to be key elements of the transformative process. She suggested that
building learning activities to incorporate critical evaluation, reflective practice, and contemplation
could be a “seedbed of perspective transformation” (p.165). In his research with prison educators,
Woods (2010) asked educators what they perceived to be their role in inmate students
transformative experiences and the strategies they used to facilitate transformation. He found that
the sense of service, love, and humor to be emergent strategies and modeling, mentoring, and
counseling to be key roles in the transformative process. In her three-year study conducted with
The purpose of this research was to examine further the role of the educator in the
transformative learning process. Key questions asked in the research were, what is the educator’s
role in the transformative learning process, what can an educator do to create opportunities for
transformation.
BECOMING A TRANSFORMATIVE EDUCATOR
Methodology
transformative educators. Grounded theory methods were used for collecting, coding, and
analyzing the data. The focus of the problem questioned what happened over time that contributed
to the participants becoming effective transformative educators. In grounded theory data are
confirmed through organized data collection and analysis of the data. This involves a constant
switching back and forth between data collection and analysis (McMillan, 2010). The aim is to
Specifically, data were collected through in-depth interviews with participants. Initial
interviews were conducted in person and follow up interviews conducted via telephone. Following
the first two interviews, a detailed data analysis was conducted to examine the relevance of the
initial questions and corresponding data and the approach of the interviewer. The interviewer then
received coaching from an experienced researcher in qualitative studies. Adjustments were made
and sub-questions added. All interviews were recorded and then analyzed. In addition, following
each interview the researcher recorded detailed field notes on an assessment of the interview that
included all impressions and feelings. Following the initial interviews, data were analyzed for
Triangulation, member checking, and peer debriefing were used as the criteria to provide
credibility in the study. Digital audio recording of the interviews allowed member checking of the
data. Further reliability was established by peer debriefing, depth of detail of field notes, and
It was hoped that the interview with transformative educators and subsequent data analysis
would provide insight for future practice of transformative learning such as key planning or actions
an educator could incorporate. An additional area of interest sought were focus areas for
The advantages to conducting in depth interviews were the opportunity for the participants
to reflect on their own experience in becoming a transformative educator. Each educator would
likely know best the essential factors that contributed towards his or her own development into an
educator with transformative intentions. Observer bias was reduced by abundant use of details.
Details of conversations were used to highlight and illustrate key patterns and interpretations.
One of the key disadvantages of the study was that observations of the educators in practice
were not included or perspectives of learners who had experienced transformation. It is possible
that factors that contribute to effective transformative learning were present in practice without the
Population
The population studied was transformative educators in the field of adult learning and
education. The author used snowball sampling to select the participants purposive sampling to
select a single educator who practices transformative learning. The first participant was a professor
of higher education and an instructor in the author’s MEd. program. The first participant then gave
referrals to three other transformative educators personally known to her, who then further
Eighteen of the educators were from higher education, thirteen of these from institutions in the
U.S., two from Canada, two from Australia, and one from the Nepal. Of the eighteen participants
BECOMING A TRANSFORMATIVE EDUCATOR
from higher education, five of these were from community colleges and the rest from four-year
institutions. Four of the educators were in the field of human resource development, two of these
from the U.S., one from Australia, and one from the U.K. Sixty percent of the participants in the
study were female and forty percent male. There was some degree of cultural diversity as indicated
above. The racial composition included fifteen Caucasian, three African-Amerian, one African,
transformative learning practices the interviews were biased. This is a regular dilemma of
qualitative studies. To control for this threat the sample included as a diverse group of educators
from a wide range of higher educational settings. The interviewer also sought to distinguish
experience from opinion and asked clarifying questions during the interviews or follow up
interviews to do the same. Further control was conducted during the data analysis to ensure
Data Analysis
The researchers used extensive, searching, and open-ended individual interviews with
transformative educators to collect data. The interviews were in-depth and unstructured and sought
the educator’s views on their role in the process of transformative learning. The list of interview
questions was distributed three days prior to the interview, by either mail or email. Initial
interviews were conducted in person and then immediately analyzed seeking emerging categories
and subcategories. During the interview, the researcher asked the participants to share their
experiences of transformative learning. The participants were engaged in dialog and encourage to
go into more depth using comments such as “could you tell me more about…” The following
• Is there anything else you would like to share regarding your experience as an educator
Following each interview, the interviewer took a half an hour to record detailed field notes
of their impression of the interview which included the comfort and attitude of the interviewee.
Subsequent interviews (some conducted via telephone) compared new information to emerging
themes in order to form propositions and hypotheses of the role of the educator in the process of
transformative learning. A total of twenty-two educators were interviewed for the study. The
categories were coded describing central views with causal and contextual conditions, resultant
actions, and conclusions. The free open source qualitative analysis software was used to assist in
the data analysis. An analysis of the categories and themes was conducted comparing the
relationship between similar codes and how resolution was determined (see Appendix A). A table
(see Appendix B) was created with the key themes that emerged and included detailed quotes
relating to respective themes. Selective coding was then used to write a story integrating the codes
that were established. The propositions and theory about the role of the educator in transformative
learning were developed using constant comparison. Theoretical sampling was used to test aspects
Reliability of the interview was insured by digital recording of each interview, literal
transcriptions, abundant use of details, detailed field notes of the inductive data analysis process,
member crosschecking, and verbatim use of educator’s words as much as possible. Internal
validity was obtained through detailed field notes, verbatim language, peer crosschecking of
categories, subcategories and subsequent coding to determine if the data were plausible. While
researcher bias is a significant threat in the interview and data analysis process, the open-ended
interview process, verbatim language, and crosschecking helped to minimize the effect. The
translatability of the resulting theory is limited due to the inherently weak generalizability of
qualitative research designs. However, the resulting propositions and theory may prove useful in
helping aspiring transformative educators better understand their role in the process of
transformative learning.
Delimitations
The strengths of the research design in this study are that the sample of participants is
practicing transformative educators. Considering the integral part of transformative theory that
critical reflection and critical self-reflection play, the selected educators were aware of many of the
steps and factors in their own process of becoming a transformative educator. As a result
exceptionally detailed and rich narratives were the rule rather than the exception in the study.
Other strengths of the study are the recording of interviews, crosschecking of data by fellow
researchers, and peer debriefing. The peer debriefing allowed for an independent review of the data
analysis.
There are several threats to internal validity in the study. Researcher bias in the interview
process could have influenced participants with the researcher’s interests or beliefs, thus leading to
implausible results and skewed data. A second threat is the inaccurate transcription and
BECOMING A TRANSFORMATIVE EDUCATOR
categorization and coding of data also resulting in implausible themes and propositions and
therefore an invalid theory. Researcher bias was controlled through abundant use of detail,
crosschecking and peer debriefing. Inaccurate data was controlled through the recording and
verbatim transcription of each interview as well as crosschecking, detailed field notes, and
verbatim language.
There are several barriers that threaten the study. One significant barrier could be subject
effects in that the educators’ selected held extremely divergent views of transformative learning
theory and practice. While Mezirow’s psychocritical theory is considered the dominant view,
Taylor (2008) suggests that there are up to eight different views of transformative learning
proposed in the literature. It is possible that this study included educators with sufficiently
divergent views on the nature of transformative learning and the educator’s role therein that
resulted in invalid data collection, inaccurate data analysis, and therefore implausible conclusions.
Data analysis and crosschecking indicated several key areas of theory that could be applied to
transformative educators in general and additional sub-categories relating to the differing views.
While there is sufficient evidence in the data collected to support the propositions of the general
theory of the role of the transformative educator, there may be inadequate data to support the
proposed sub-theories. Further studies would be needed to confirm the general theory and explore
Another barrier to the study is the fact that there is no previous research found in the
literature that attempts to create a theory about the role of the educator in transformative learning.
As a result, there is no similar data analysis or resulting elements of theory to build upon. This may
The study of the role of the educator in the transformative learning process could be
improved in several ways. One way to improve the study would be to include the observation of
transformative educators in action over time in the setting of a classroom or learning event.
Including 2-3 observations using detailed field notes of each educator would provide an addition
data to check internal validity. Another way to improve the study would be to include interviews
with students and learners in classes and learning events of the transformative educators to
determine their views on the role of the educator in their own process of transformation. These
additional sources of data would expand the source of rich data and provide an opportunity for
triangulation, where the results from the different data collection methods could be compared to
References
Cranton, P. (2002). Teaching for transformation. New Directions for Adult and Continuing
King, K. (2004). Both Sides Now: Examining Transformative Learning and Professional
Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and
Mezirow, J., and Associates (Eds.). (2000). Learning as Transformation. San Francisco: Jossey-
Bass.
Taylor, E. (1998). The theory and practice of transformative learning: A critical review. Center on
Education and Training for Employment, Columbus, OH. (ERIC Document Reproduction
Taylor, E. (2006). The challenge of teaching for change. New Directions for Adult and Continuing
Taylor, E. (2007). An update of transformative learning theory: A critical review of the empirical
10.1080/02601370701219475
Taylor, E. (2008). Transformative learning theory. New Directions for Adult and Continuing
Taylor, K. (2006). Brain Function and Adult Learning: Implications for Practice. New Directions
Woods, R.. Synchronicity and transformation in the experience of prison educators. Ph.D.