Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
(a)
Dept. Ultrasonic Signals, Systems and Technology
Institute of Acoustics (CSIC)
Serrano 144, 28006 MADRID, (SPAIN)
(a)
art@ia.cetef.csic.es, tgomez@ia.cetef.csic.es
847
application, (for example, one element added to the resin and the silicone rubber listed in Table I can be
piezoelectric ceramic rear face and named “backing”). used as the first or inner matching layer, while the
The enormous impedance mismatch between membranes in Table I can be used as the second or
piezoceramics (≈30 MRayl) and air (≈0.0004 MRayl) outer matching layer. Membrane materials, unlike the
has two important consequences for the design of air- other available materials, are only available at certain
coupled transducers: sensivity is very low (∼ -60 dB ) grades and thicknesses, hence, for a given membrane
and bandwidth is quite narrow (∼ 5%). Sensivity can be material and grade fr is fixed and can not be changed.
improved by a single matching layer, but widening the The only way to obtain a different fr is to change the
frequency bandwidth requires the use two or more grade, the material or the vendor (Gómez 2003a and
matching layers. The selection of the suitable matching 2003b)
layer materials is a key issue. The properties of the selected materials were
analyzed and considered for the realization of distinct
transducer design alternatives, including one or two
Outer matching layer
matching layers. This analysis was complemented with
Inner matching layer modelling and simulation tasks of different transducer
Piezoceramic disk design options evaluated inside a selected practical
transceiver configuration.
Aluminium Housing
Table I. Materials properties
Material Z fr α at fr
(MRayl) (MHz) (Np/m)
Polyurethane 2.25 1.00 45
BNC connector Epoxy resin 2.80 1.00 40
Silicone Rubber 1.35 1.00 45
Nylon 0.11 1.00 (*) 270
Figure 1. Diagram of the two-matching layers air- membrane (1)
coupled transducer design. Polyethersulfone 0.25 1.20 (*) 200
membrane (1,2)
Aditionally the thickness of the layers is a critical Cellulose 0.25 1.00 (*) 400
factor and several matching configurations have been Nitrate (1,2)
proposed (Kelly, Hayward, and Gómez 2004, Gómez Cellulose 0.12 0.7 (*) 680
2004, Toda 2002). In any of these matching Nitrate (3)
configurations, a key aspect for the successful design is 1: Gómez (2003a)
the acoustic impedance of outer layer. This is highly 2: Gómez (2004)
limited by the availability of suitable materials having 3: Kelly, Hayward, and Gómez 2004.
the very low specific acoustic impedance, very low *: Frequency is given thickness and membrane grade.
attenuation, and the required thickness for the designed They can not be changed to tune the resonant frequency.
configuration and working frequency.
The optimum acoustic impedance of the quarter 3. ULTRASONIC TRANSCEIVER MODEL
wavelength layer can be obtained by the following A through-transmission (T-T) configuration was
expression: considered in order to simulate the performance of the
different design alternatives. This transceiver
configuration was implemented in a circuit analysis
Z l = Z1Z 2 (1)
program (PSPICE). Figure 2 presents the electric
diagram of the pulsed T-T arrangement, used in the
where Z l is acoustic impedance of the matching layer. simulation process.
Z1 and Z 2 are the acoustic impedance of the
piezoceramic and the air respectively.
For a stack of matching layers, the equation (1) can
be generalized and the impedance of successive layers
to be added can be also obtained.
An analysis of a group of the more proper materials
for the construction of the matching layers at 1 MHz Figure 2. Electrical diagram of the Through-
was done. Table I summarizes the properties required Transmision configutation.
by the simulation model of some candidate materials to
produce quarter wavelength matching layers to match The piezoelectric stages were modeled using a
piezoelectric transducers to the air using a two-layers PSPICE implementation, of a well-known equivalent
scheme. In Table I Z is the specific acoustic impedance, circuit [Redwood 1961], and which included a quadratic
fr is the quarter wavelength resonant frequency and α is frequency dependence of the mecanical losses in the
the attenuation coefficient. The polyurethane, the epoxy piezoceramic material [Ramos A., Ruíz A., San Emeterio J.
848
L., Sanz P.T., 2006]. The three port blocks (PZ27), matching layer the acoustic impedance (according to
symbolize the emitting-receiving probes, constructed Eq. 1) takes the value of 0.11 MRayls. For the case
from piezoceramic PZ27 (Ferroperm piezoceramics with two ideal and lossless quarter-wavelength
a/s). Pins e, b and f denote respectively the electrical matching layers, the first or inner matching layer has an
and mechanical (back and front) ports of the acoustic impedance of 0.73 MRayl while the second or
transducers. Additionally, the matching layers were outer matching layer has an acoustic impedance of
modelled employing lossy transmission lines using the 0.0017 MRayl. It is worthwhile to consider the fact that
corresponding material acoustical properties as input while for the one matching layer configuration it is
data [Van Deventer J., Torbjörn L., Jerker D., 2000]. possible to find some solid materials having an
The electronic driving stage was modelled by a impedance close to the theoretically required value (at
pulsed source and a resistor, and considering the the cost of a non-negligible attenuation), there are not
practical driving conditions employed. The receiving any known solid material with such a low acoustic
electronic included, some elements which symbolize the impedance value as required by the outer matching
input impedance of the oscilloscope used. Figure 3 layer in the two layers configuration.
presents the driving electrical signal provided by the Figure 4 presents the comparison of the simulated
pulse source for the experimental measurements. This Through-Transmission (T-T) Frequency Response
was generated by a Panametrics 5077 pulser/receiver. considering different design alternatives in the frontal
This is one half negative cycle of a square wave. The face of the air-coupled transducer. The solid curve
width of the pulse is tuned to provide a maximum represents the (T-T) response without matching layer in
energy output at the transducer centre frequency (1 the frontal face of the transducer and the dashed and
MHz in this case). A similar signal was used for dotted curves, with one and two matching layers,
modeling purposes. respectively. The ripple observed at low frequencies is
For all cases it was considered that the transmitter produced by the signal reverberations produced within
transducer was very similar to the receiver transducer the air gap. A notable increment of the amplitude can be
and that they were separated by an air gap 5 cm thick. observed for both cases were a matching layer was
used, respect to the case without matching layer.
Additionally, a significant bandwidth increment is
0
-10
observed for the two-matching layer option.
-20
1
10
-30
Amplitude (V)
-40
0
10
-50
-60
-1
10
-70
Magnitude (V)
-80
-2
-90 10
-100
-3
1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 10
Time (s)
-5
x 10
-4
10
849
nylon membrane. According to this, two identical generated at the receiver transducer were digitized and
prototype transducers made of PZ27 piezoceramic and stored using a digital oscilloscope (TDS 5052). As
two quarter-wavelength matching layers (polyurethane observed in the simulation, the pulse amplitude
and nylon membrane) were built. The transducer increases notably with the addition of matching layers.
response is both measured and modelled at three In this case, the first reverberation within the air gap
different stages: 1. before attaching any matching layer, between transducers is also observed, though only about
2. after the attachment of the first (or inner) one but 120 μs later than the through transmitted signal, because
before attaching the second (or outer) one, 3. after both the air gap length is smaller (2 cm).
matching layers have been attached. This is useful for
the control of the fabrication process, because in this
way the integrity and correct functioning of each
matching layer can be determined.
In Figure 5 the Simulated Through-Transmission
Temporal Response considering different design
alternatives in the frontal face of the air-coupled
transducer, for the selected optimum design, employing
real and low attenuating materials, is presented. In this
Figure we can clearly appreciate the through transmitted
signal from the transmitter to the receiver (this is the
signal that arrives first) and also the first reverberation
within the air gap. As the distance between transducers
is 5 cm, this reverberation appears about 300 μs later
than the through transmitted one. A bigger amplitude in
the (T-T) waveforms is observed with the addition of
one and two matching layers in the frontal face of the
piezoceramic. Figure 6. Picture of the air-coupled piezoceramic
-4
transducer constructed according to the proposed design
x 10
2
Without matching layer
i.e. with two matching layers in the frontal face).
Through-Transmission Amplitude (V)
1
-3
0 x 10
-1
Through transmission Amplitude (V)
-2 1
-3
x 10 0
2 One matching layer
1 -1
0 -3
x 10
-1 10
-2
5
0.05 0
Two matching layers
-5
0
-0.05
1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5
0.05
-4
x 10
0
Time (s)
-0.05
Figure 5. Simulated Through-Transmission Temporal 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8
Response considering different design alternatives in Time (s)
-4
x 10
850
reverberations before the FFT is calculated. It is matching layers in the front face of the piezoceramic
possible to appreciate bigger amplitude and bandwidth (see previous sections) together with three different
in the design alternatives with one and two matching backing options: no backing (original solution), 2
layers respectively with respect the no matching layer MRayl backing, and 7 MRayl backing. The second
option. Although the one layer option increases the alternative (2 MRayl) corresponds to a light backing
transducer performance, it is further improved by the material, this can be achieved by using a silicon rubber.
addition of a second matching layer. In general, the The third option (7 MRayl) corresponds to a heavy
resonances experimentally observed are not so sharp as backing that can be achieved by using an epoxy resin
those theoretically predicted. This is due to possible loaded with tungsten powder.
imperfections of the layers (i.e. lack of homogeneity or Results are shown in Figure 9. This Figure presents
flatness) and also to the possible contribution of the a comparison among the Simulated Through-
layer of glue used to attach the nylon membrane to the Transmission Temporal Responses considering the
polyurethane layer. three different design alternatives in the rear face of the
air-coupled transducer mentioned above. A shorter
pulse length in the (T-T) waveforms can be observed
Solid – Without matching layer with the addition of a backing, in the rear face of the
Blue - Experim
2
Dot - One Matching Layer piezoceramic. As mentioned above this pulse reduction
10 Dashed - Two Matching Layers Red - Simul
is concomitant with a bandwidth enlargement. A clear
Normalized magnitude (a.u.)
851
5. CONCLUSIONS to rigid open cell foams. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88,
A new approach to model air-coupled piezoelectric 221910.
transducers with improved bandwidth and only Gómez Álvarez-Arenas, T. E. González-Gómez, I.
considering real and low attenuating materials, is 2007, Spatial normalization of the high-frequency
presented. ultrasound energy loss in open-cell foams. Appl.
This model has been used to determine the best Phys. Lett., 90, 201903.
configuration for a 1 MHz air-coupled transducer based Gómez Álvarez-Arenas, T. E., Apel, P. Yu. And
on a PZ27 piezoceramic and only considering real Orelovitch, O. L., 2007. Characterization of ion-
materials to produce matching layers. Configurations track membranes by non-contact ultrasonic
based on one and two quarter-wavelength matching magnitude and phase spectroscopy. J. Membr. Sci.,
layers has been studied. The result of this study is a 301, 210-220.
transducer configuration based on a double matching Hutchins, D. A. and Schindel, 1994. D. W., Advances
layer made of polyurethane and nylon membrane. In in non-contact and air-coupled transducers. Proc.
addition, the performance of ideal air-coupled IEEE Ultrason Symp., 1245-1254.
transducers using ideal matching layers has also been Kelly, S.P., Hayward, G., and Gómez Álvarez-Arenas,
modelled. This provides a reference value in order to T. E., 2004. Characterization and assessment of an
compare the performance of real transducers. Finally, integrated matching layer for air-coupled
the utility of the use of different backing materials has ultrasonic applications, IEEE Trans. Ultrason.,
been modelled in order to determine the possibility to Ferroelect., Freq. Contr., 51 (10) 1314-1323.
further increase the bandwidth of the proposed solution. McIntyre, C. S., Hutchins, D. A., Billso, D. R. and Stor-
According to the model predictions, a pair of Pellinen, J., 2001. The use of air-coupled
prototype air-coupled transducers was built. The model ultrasound to test paper. IEEE Trans. Ultrason.,
predictions have been compared with the Ferroelect., Freq., Contr., 48 (3), 717-727.
experimentally measured performance of the prototype Redwood, M. 1961, Transient Performance of a
transducers. This provides an initial verification of the Piezoelectric Transducer. J. Acoustic. Soc. Amer.,
model capability. 33 (4), 527-536.
Ramos A., Ruíz A., San Emeterio J. L., Sanz P.T.,
REFERENCES 2006. Pspice circuital modelling of ultrasonic
Van Deventer J., Torbjörn L., Jerker D., 2000. Pspice imaging transceivers including frequency-
Simulation of Ultrasonic Systems, IEEE Trans. dependent acoustic losses and signal distortions in
Ultrason. Ferroelect. Freq. Contr., 47 (4), 1014- electronic stages. Ultrasonics, 44, e995–e1000.
1024. Toda, M. 2002, New type of matching layers for air-
Grandia, W. A. and Fortunko, C. M., 1995, NDE coupled ultrasonic transducers. IEEE Trans.
applications of air-coupled ultrasonic transducers. Ultrason., Ferroelect., Freq., Contr., 49 (7), 972-
Proc. IEEE Ultrason. Symp., pp. 697-708. 979.
Fortunko, C. M., Renken, M. C., and Murray, A., 1990,
Examination of objects made of wood using air-
coupled ultrasound. Proc. IEEE. Ultrason. Symp.,
1099-1103.
Gómez Álvarez-Arenas, T. E., Montero, F., Moner-
Girona, M. Rodríguez, E. Roig, A. Molins, E.
2002, Viscoelasticity of silica aerogels at
ultrasonic frequencies. Appl. Phys. Lett. 81 (7),
1198-1200.
Gómez Álvarez-Arenas, T. E., 2003a. Air-coupled
ultrasonic spectroscopy for the study of membrane
filters, J. Membr Sci. 213, 195-207.
Gómez Álvarez-Arenas, T. E., 2003b. A Nondestructive
integrity test for membrane filters based on air-
coupled ultrasonic spectroscopy, IEEE Trans.
Ultrason. Ferroelect. Freq. Contr., 50 (6), 676-
685.
Gómez Álvarez-Arenas, T. E., 2004. Acoustic
impedance matching of piezoelectric transducers
to the air, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelect. Freq.
Contr., 51 (5), 624-633.
Gómez Álvarez-Arenas, T. E., de la Fuente, S.,
González-Gómez, I. 2006, Simultaneous
determination of apparent tortuosity and
microstructure length scale ane shape: Application
852