Sie sind auf Seite 1von 10

Can LED lighting deliver?

Incandescent lamps are cheap but tend to have short lifetimes. The light emitted by
incandescent sources is perceived as particularly pleasant because these hot radiators
generate a continuous (or full) emission spectrum. But this very fact means that they
waste much of the electrical energy supplied to them. Compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs)
are actually the least compact of all the various lamps commercially available at present
(Figure 1). While CFLs are certainly energy efficient, replacing an incandescent light bulb
with a CFL is not just a matter of screwing out one lamp and screwing in the other. While
the CFL thread fits the lamp holder socket, the lamp doesn’t always suit the luminaire
(see Figure 2) – and it is not uncommon for users to reject the energy-saving CFL on
aesthetic grounds.
Other consumers dislike the ‘cold’ light that they claim CFLs produce, although there are now
plenty of so-called warm-tone lamps available on the market. And if the CFL is located in a cold
environment, the luminous flux produced by the lamp drops as a result. Frequent switching also
tends to shorten the lifetime of a CFL. In fact, frequent switching shortens the lifetime of incan-
descent lamps, too – but this is less of a problem because replacing an incandescent filament
lamp is a lot cheaper than replacing a CFL. Incandescent lamps are also used in headlamps
and spotlights and they can also be dimmed without difficulty. CFLs on the other hand are only
dimmable in certain cases, and with an angle of radiation of approximately 120°, CFL-based
spotlights are spotlights in name only. Finally, the efficiency of both fluorescent and incan-
descent lamps decreases rapidly, the more they are dimmed. In the light of all these limitations,
there is a need to develop a source of light
• whose lifetime does not deteriorate with frequent switching,
• that provides the full luminous flux immediately after being switched on,
• that can be dimmed to zero with relatively little technical effort,
• whose efficiency remains high at both full and partial loads,
• that can provide both a point beam and a broad cone of illumination depending on lamp
• that has a long lifetime,
• and is still affordable.

Figure 1: Too hot: the mains-voltage halogen lamp Figure 2: The aesthetic issues with some CFLs often
(left) is power hungry and short-lived. Too bulky (see means that these lamps are not used to save energy
also Figure 2): the (theoretically) compatible CFL, in living areas.
shown in the middle, is hard to focus. Is the LED lamp
pictured right the answer?

LED.doc Page 1 of 10
Lamps that meet these requirements are now available. What is regarded as ‘affordable’ is of
course a matter of opinion. However, when a lamp is available that costs ten times as much as
a halogen spotlight, but has an operating life twenty times as long, is that lamp expensive or
Light-emitting diodes (LEDs) have been used for over three decades as indicator lamps on
electronic devices. However, the last few years have seen a number of significant develop-
ments, particular the manufacture of high-brightness LEDs, so that light-emitting diodes seem to
be a realistic alternative for space lighting purposes. Or are they? In what follows, we shall be
taking a close look at the properties of these new light sources.

Back to school: The physics of LEDs

Light-emitting diodes are, as the name says, diodes. To generate light, LEDs have to be forward
biased. If reverse biased, they would also light up – but only once! The reverse or ‘cut-off’
voltage of an LED is relatively low as they are not designed to be used for rectification. Like all
diodes, an LED exhibits an exponential characteristic under forward bias conditions. An LED
does not therefore obey Ohm’s law, in which voltage and current are linearly proportional to one
another, but exhibits an exponential dependence. The dependence of the diode current ID on
the voltage VD applied to the diode is given by the following expression:
⎛ V ⎞
⎜ nV ⎟

I D = IS ⎜e − 1⎟ [1]

⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
n is the emission coefficient (essentially a correction factor for the individual diode);
VT = is the so-called thermal voltage;

k = 1.38*10-23 J/K is the Boltzmann constant;

q = 1,6*10-19 As is the elementary charge (the charge on a single electron);
T is the absolute temperature of the diode junction at the moment of measurement;
80mA 320mW
u Î

70mA 280mW

60mA 240mW
ID theor (kalt)
50mA ID theor (warm) 200mW
ID mess
40mA 160mW
i Î

PD theor (kalt)
30mA PD theor (warm) 120mW
PD mess
20mA 80mW

10mA 40mW
t Î
0mA 0mW
1,5V 2,0V 2,5V 3,0V 3,5V 4,0V

Figure 4: Voltage-current characteristics of a single

(large) LED of the type used in LED lamps
Figure 3: Measurement on a single (large) LED of the
type used in LED lamps

IS is the diode’s (reverse) saturation current, which – essentially irrespective of the applied
voltage – also flows in the high-resistance direction provided that the diode’s cut-off voltage is
not exceeded. In the case of a germanium diode, IS is of the order of 100 nA; IS for a silicon
diode is about 10 pA. Even though the absolute values of both these saturation currents are

LED.doc Page 2 of 10
very small, the relative difference between the two currents is 1:10 000. This value is of par-
ticular significance when attempting to compute the behaviour of the diode in the forward bias
direction (see Figure 4).
It is clear from the above equation that as the temperature T is part of the exponent, it has a
strong influence on the magnitude of the diode current. But as the current changes so does the
temperature. Fortunately, as T and hence VT rises, the exponent itself gets smaller, so pre-
venting the diode current from rising catastrophically. This temperature response is evident in
measurements of a large LED designed for use in a solar-powered light (Figure 3). The thin
lines represent the theoretically computed curves for the ‘cold’ and ‘warm’ states, based on the
assumption that diode heating is negligible at a diode current of 0.8 mA and is 53 K at 80 mA
and assuming a value of n = 5.7 for the diode’s correction factor (i.e. emission coefficient). The
ambient temperature was 19°C or 292 K when expressed on the absolute temperature scale
required here. It is clear from Figure 4 that the measured current-voltage characteristic curves in
the current range of interest (0.8 - 80 mA) lie between the theoretical curves computed for the
‘cold’ and ‘warm’ states. Assuming a correction factor of n = 5.7, the diode equation shown
above is thus seen to provide a realistic model of the behaviour of this randomly chosen diode.
Putting theory to one side, in what follows we shall only be interested in the thicker lines in
Figure 4 that show how the measured I-V characteristic curves respond to the unavoidable
heating effects.

Keeping the current under control

The measurement data in Figure 4 show that very small changes in the applied voltage lead to
extremely large changes in the diode current and diode power. It is therefore necessary to limit
the current in some way. The simplest way of limiting the current is to connect a resistance in
series with the LED. A somewhat more elegant solution is to use a transistor-based protective
circuit. But in both cases, the excess voltage is simply dissipated as thermal energy. If that ex-
cess energy is to be saved and not wasted, the solution is to use a high-frequency switched-
mode power supply that is more complicated, and hence more sensitive and expensive. These
devices are particularly useful in isolated loads when the availability of electrical power is
limited, such as in solar-powered traffic signs, garden lamps, etc. It is in these low-power,
isolated devices (e.g. torches, bicycle lights) that LEDs have been most successful at replacing
filament incandescent lamps.
200mA LED-Leuchtmittel 12V 1,25W weiß 300mA LED-Leuchtmittel 12V 1,7W warmweiß



150mA 2,0VA

I= I=
P; Q; S Î

P; Q; S Î

100mA I˜ 150mA I˜ 2,0VA
P= P=
P˜ 1,0VA P˜ 1,5VA
S˜ S˜
50mA Q˜ Q˜
0,5VA 50mA
0mA 0,0VA 0mA 0,0VA
6V 7V 8V 9V 10V 11V 12V 13V 14V 6V 7V 8V 9V 10V 11V 12V 13V 14V

Figure 5: 12 V, 1.25 W LED lamp from Osram on DC Figure 6: 12 V, 1.7 W LED lamp from Megaman on
and AC supplies DC and AC supplies

Which current limiting strategy has been selected can sometimes be determined relatively easily
by measurement. A comparison of two LED lamps, both of which are designed to be driven by
12 V DC or AC supplies, illustrates how the distinction can be made apparent. The current in the
Osram lamp initially increases exponentially but as the voltage rises the lamp clearly begins to

LED.doc Page 3 of 10
limit the further growth of the current (Figure 5). This result is in itself proof that the Osram lamp
contains some form of electronic control. In the Megaman lamp, the current is limited by a
simple resistor (Figure 6).
Interestingly, the Osram lamp was older than the simpler Megaman model.The power of com-
mercial LED lamps has been rising continually, and the higher power rating of the Megaman
lamp is enough to indicate that it is the younger of the two models tested. The oscilloscope
images offer a clearer picture of how the diode current behaves. Figure 7 and Figure 8 display
the voltage, current and THD profiles that result when these two LED lamps are driven by a
50 Hz AC voltage supply of 10, 12 or 14 V (rms). It is clear that the Osram lamp does not
attempt to restrict the current at voltages up to 10 V AC, at higher voltages the amplitude of the
current waveform is truncated at a maximum current limit of 200 mA. When the lamp is driven
by a DC voltage source, increasing the light output at voltages above 10 V can only be achieved
by enlarging the conduction angle. If the lamp is connected to a DC supply, no further increase
in light intensity is possible. The problem is that the power loss in the transistor rises with in-
creasing voltage. An overvoltage therefore means that the lamp is less economical to run. This
could be avoided by using a switched-mode power supply but given the modest power levels in
these lamps the cost would be prohibitive.
Figure 5 shows that the current in the LED lamp is negligible at sinusoidal rms voltages of 8 V or
lower, i.e. when the instantaneous AC voltage (or the DC voltage in the case of a DC supply)
drops below about 10 V – as is apparent from a careful examination of the upper row of voltage
and current curves in Figure 7. The threshold voltage is most clearly seen in the measurements
made using a DC voltage supply. An LED has a higher conducting-state voltage (or ‘cut-in’
voltage) than, say, the approximately 0.8 V exhibited by a typical silicon diode. The model
tested here (Figure 4), for instance, has a cut-in voltage of around 3.8 V. To make optimum use
of the supply voltage, multiple LEDs are connected in series such that the supply voltage is just
greater than the sum of the ‘cut-in’ voltages of the individual diodes. LED lamps are in fact com-
posed of one or more parallel-connected groups, with each group comprising one or more
serially connected LEDs.

Figure 7: Behaviour of the 12 V, 1.25 W LED lamp from Osram

The LEDs in the Megaman lamp are obviously being fed a DC voltage irrespective of whether
the lamp is connected to an AC or DC source. This can be seen in the current profiles and the
harmonic spectra in Figure 8, which are identical to those found for a non-PF-corrected CFL that
operates according to the same principle. The LEDs are only grouped in series (with corres-
ponding resistors) after the voltage has been rectified and then smoothed. The advantage of
this solution is that the LEDs are illuminated all the time and not just when the voltage curve
passes through its peak. It is possible that the higher rated power of the Megaman lamp is
simply a reflection of this fact. The optimum solution would be to combine this type of rectified
voltage with the current limiting system used in the Osram lamp.
LED.doc Page 4 of 10
Figure 8: Behaviour of the 12 V, 1.7 W LED lamp from Megaman

Running LEDs (or other semiconductor diodes) in parallel is not usually an option as the rapid
exponential rise in the current-voltage characteristic means that even minor differences in the
cut-in voltages can lead to a very unequal distribution of current in the branches of the parallel
circuit. The fact that the LEDs are connected in groups becomes apparent when the voltage is
lowered and not all the LEDs darken to the same extent, but they don’t all behave independent-
ly of one another either. In Figure 9 the DC voltage has been reduced to 7 V, a mere two LEDs
continue to glow – and that surprisingly brightly.

Figure 10: As this advertisement for a 12 V LED lamp

makes clear, the lamp has to be run with a conven-
tional transformer. Clearly ‘full compatibility’ is still
some way off.

Figure 9: Behaviour of an LED lamp at a low supply


Using LED lamps in practice

A particular advantage of 12-volt LED lamps is that they can be used as a direct replacement for
existing halogen spotlights. Although in some cases the LED lamps can only be run on con-
ventional halogen lamp transformers (see Figure 10 and ref. [2]). The reason why the manu-

LED.doc Page 5 of 10
facturers do not allow them to be driven by electronic halogen lamp transformers is not
specified. A brief test indicates that the lamps also function on an electronic transformer, the
question is of course: for how long? It has to be stated, though, that in this case only one out of
four lamps being run on one electronic transformer had been replaced (Figure 11). The re-
striction made in Figure 10 is probably not to be blamed on the LED but on the transformer,
since most electronic halogen lamp transformers prove unable to cope with part load. When one
out of a number of lamps connected fails, still nothing much happens, but as the second one
fails a complete failure or continuous flickering of the remaining lamps is very often the result.
As the benefits of an electronic transformer are often not quite as far-reaching as the advertise-
ments would have us believe, it is probably safer to use conventional transformers made of
copper and iron when installing halogen lamps. Toroidal-core transformers are particularly well
suited to these applications, because the power requirements decrease substantially when
halogen spotlights are replaced by LED lamps and toroidal-core transformers exhibit significant-
ly better efficiencies when partially loaded. In contrast, the efficiency of a conventional trans-
former drops significantly when run under partial load, and the performance of an electronic
transformer will more often than not end up in a disaster.
η Ï


η, 60VA standard transformer

η, 60VA toroidal core transformer
η, 400VA standard transformer
20% η, 400VA toroidal core transformer

I sec / I sec,nom Î
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200%

Figure 12: Variance of efficiencies in traditional and

Figure 11: One out of four 20 W halogen spotlights in toroidal core transformers 60 VA and 400 VA, re-
a system replaced with an LED lamp 1.25 W spectively, with varying load

Improved efficiency?
According to current forecasts, LED lamps have a great future ahead of them. These predictions
refer to a number of features of these lamps, including their energy efficiency. There are reports
of overall luminous efficiencies of 100 lumens of luminous flux for every watt of input power,
making the LED lamp as efficient as the most efficient fluorescent lamps. Lab measurements of
a single LED lamp alone already yield an overall luminous efficiency of up to 100 lm/W, while
the system as whole, i.e. including the voltage converter, results in values of up to 50 lm/W. The
job of the voltage converter is to reduce the mains voltage to the required low operating voltage.
Most voltage converters are electronic devices that feed the strings of LEDs with a high-
frequency voltage or in the optimum case with a stabilized DC voltage. Occasionally LED lamps
are run directly at mains frequency, for instance when they are used to replace existing halogen
spotlights, i.e. the step-down transformer is already in place and only the control electronics (in
the simplest case: a rectifier and a series resistor) need to be built into the lamp. It should be
mentioned that the loss in power that results in the drop in overall luminous efficiency from
100 lm/W to 50 lm/W is due to the fact that the sample lamps used here are of very low power.
Just as higher efficiency ballasts and transformers have been designed for use with fluorescent
lamps and halogen lamps respectively, more efficient LED-based lamp systems can be built for
higher power applications.

LED.doc Page 6 of 10
The LED lamps currently available commercially can be thought of as lying somewhere between
incandescent lamps and fluorescent lamps. The 1.5-W lamp in Figure 10 is specified as having
an illuminance of 240 lux. As it stands, this information is not particularly meaningful.
Illuminance is a measure of the total luminous flux incident on a unit area of the illuminated
surface. The more of a lamp’s luminous flux that can be directed onto the surface, the greater its
illuminance. The total luminous flux from a light source is measured in lumens. According to the
experts at Osram, it is very difficult to measure accurately the total luminous flux of a directed
(focused) light source. Advertisements for these products will sometimes quote illuminance
values in a way that gives the impression that customers can use these figures to make a
meaningful comparison between competitor products. However, if sharper focusing enables the
emitted light from a lamp to be concentrated into an area one quarter of that previously
illuminated, the illuminance of the lamp is suddenly four times as great, although the overall
luminous efficiency (strictly ‘overall luminous efficacy’) of the lamp has not changed at all. While
the total amount of visible light falling on a certain area of surface is obviously an important
quantity in describing a lamp’s properties, it says nothing whatsoever about the lamp’s energy
Nevertheless, the relatively simple replacement of a halogen spotlight by an LED spotlight re-
presents a major step towards achieving more efficient use of energy resources. It cannot be
repeated too often: halogen lamps are incandescent filament lamps and as such are only
marginally more efficient than the ordinary incandescent filament bulbs found at the low end of
the energy classification scheme published by the EU. Typically, the standard household in-
candescent lamp will be given a class E rating, with classes ranging from A (most efficient) to G
(least efficient). And if the lamp has a power rating below 40 W or if the glass bulb is decorated
in some way, the lamp more often than not slips down into class F. Halogen lamps with a clear
quartz envelope usually have a class D energy rating, though if the envelope has a matt finish,
they move down a level to class E. Once again we are dealing here with a classification scheme
with an inbuilt and unnecessary limitation. By defining ‘class A’ as the most efficient category,
the scale has been needlessly truncated at the wrong end. While it can be extended to include
classes of ever poorer efficiency by simply adding another letter to the series, extending it to in-
clude new products exhibiting previously unattained levels of efficiency is not so simple. With
the exception perhaps of wax candles and torches, light sources with class G efficiency have
never been available, except for the unspeakable ‘Linestra’ lamps which, on top of all, are often
confused with fluorescent lighting tubes. But as the classification scale has been around for
some time, during which the lighting industry has not stood still, household lamps are now
available that can only be classified by using constructions such as ‘class A+’ and ‘class A++’.
In the case of T5 fluorescent tubes, both the high-efficiency (HE) lamps and the brighter (but
much less efficient) ‘high-output’ (HO) models are given a class A rating. And T8 lamps, which
are claimed to be technically outdated, are also found in the (obviously very broad) class A
category, while the essentially dead category ‘G’ still forms part of the overall classification
scheme. Seen against this background, it is all the more irresponsible when a well-known
manufacturer launches a series of improved halogen lamps that consume 30 % less energy and
then markets these lamps under the banner ‘energy saver’, which is of course the term already
used for compact fluorescent lamps. 30 % less power consumption relative to earlier halogen
lamp models is still 400 % more than the power consumed by an equivalent CFL and 200 %
more than currently available LED lamps from the same manufacturer! Interestingly, the
catalogue entry for these ‘energy saver’ halogen lamps does not say anything about their
energy saver classification.
Additionally, there are a number of very common lamps, such as reflector lamps, that are not in-
cluded in the classification scheme. The same is also true of lamps with a wattage of below 4 W
[3], which means that the LED lamps current available on the market do not yet have to be
classified in terms of their energy efficiency.

LED.doc Page 7 of 10
The power problem
Light-emitting diodes are by their very nature directed sources of light. If one wants to have a
more diffuse light source, steps have to be taken to scatter the beam – something that is easier
to achieve than the reverse process of constructing a directed beam of light from a widely dis-
persed light source. It is the well-defined and directed nature of the light beam from halogen
spotlights that have made them so popular. Fortunately, the light from LED spotlights has the
same characteristics. Replacing a halogen spotlight by an LED spotlight couldn’t be more
straightforward. Unfortunately, LED lamps do not deliver the required power. A 1.7-watt LED
lamp is just about bright enough to replace a 5-watt halogen spotlight, but certainly not one of
the far more common 20 W or 35 W models. As a result, LED lamps have not so far had a
major commercial impact in the domestic lighting market. However, Osram, for example, is
already conducting laboratory tests on 1000-lumen LED lamps.

The colour problem

Light-emitting diodes generate monochromatic light, i.e. light of a single colour or, more pre-
cisely, light of a single frequency or wavelength. To create white light using these mono-
chromatic sources requires mixing the light from a red, a green and a blue LED. It has in fact
proved possible to combine three such LEDs in a single housing. The Tridonic company has
managed to create a white LED light source using a very different approach. As in a fluorescent
lamp, a phosphor conversion coating is applied to the envelope of a blue LED. Light of longer
wavelengths, i.e. of lower frequencies and hence of lower energy can then be created by down-
conversion of the higher frequency blue light. However, achieving the right mixture of colours
and thus the desired type of ‘white’ is a challenging technical problem in both techniques. It is
probably more accurate to call the white light generated by ‘normal’ white LED lamps as light
blue (Figure 14) and the ‘warm white’ LED lamps now available have a definite yellowish
appearance (Figure 13). But according to both Osram and Tridonic, rapid progress can be
expected in this area.

Figure 13: Three CFLs compared to a ‘white’ LED

lamp (on the right at the back) and a ‘warm white’ LED
lamp (on the left at the back)

Figure 14: Corridor lighting in a hotel in Berlin’s ‘blue

light district’

LED.doc Page 8 of 10
It is not known how long the lamps in Figure 14 have been in use. It could well be that the hotel
proprietor bought them more or less as prototype LED lamps a long time ago, only to discover
that they seem to last forever. If the colour had been better, they would probably at that time
have been so expensive that he wouldn’t have bought them in the first place. When it comes to
lighting living spaces, there is a definite preference in Europe for a more yellowish light. How-
ever, the distinctiveness of the bluish white light is particularly appropriate for bicycle lamps
where it is not so much a question of seeing but more of being seen. And the added safety that
a cyclist or other road user gains from having distinctive illumination at night will last until these
new lamp types have become the norm. As it stands, however, LED-based technology is simply
not bright enough at present for use in car headlamps, but developments are clearly moving in
the right direction. Audi, for instance, is already using LEDs for daytime running lights. LED
lamps are in fact ideal for use in a vehicle’s rear and indicator lights, as the required colours can
be generated directly without, as is currently the case, having to use an inefficient incandescent
bulb to generate a continuous spectrum from which all the other colours are then filtered out.
Once again, it is the bicycle, which typically has only 3 watts of electrical power available, that is
currently best able to profit from LED technology. Not only do LED lamps make bicycles more
visible from the rear, the conventional front headlamp is being increasingly replaced by the far
more conspicuous LED flashing lamp, whose lifetime is not shortened by frequent switching and
that does not generate switching peaks. Almost all other lamps produce these effects. In the
case of fluorescent lamps driven by a low-loss magnetic ballast the cause is core saturation, in
(smaller) fluorescent lamps with an electronic ballast and no active power-factor correction it is
the smoothing capacitor, in (larger) fluorescent lamps with an electronic ballast and an active
power-factor correction circuit it is the filter capacitor, and in the case of the incandescent lamp
it is the low resistance of the cold filament.

One could draw the conclusion that LED lamps are expensive and weak, that their light is ‘cold’
and that their energy efficiency is only half as good as that of a CFL – making them pretty much
useless as replacements for anything. However, their efficiency is far superior to that of an
incandescent lamp, they have extremely long lifetimes, are able to work at all typical operating
temperatures, they do not need time to stabilize or warm up, they are insensitive to frequent
switching and do not interfere with the switching device. They are small, compact and produce a
focused beam of light. The development from simple indicator lamps to light sources that are
now beginning to find practical applications has been extremely quick. It seems therefore safe to
assume that further progress will be made and that in a few years LED lamps will be available
for a wide range of lighting applications. LED lamps require an electronic controller that is
usually built in to base of the lamp, but as the design is simpler than that required for CFLs, it
seems unlikely that this will delay or hinder development. In view of the relatively low power of
the LED lamps available up until now, there has been little demand for dimmable devices, but
making dimmable LED lamps should not prove to be a technical problem. The efficiency when
running at partial load is as good or better than at full load, a fact that makes LED lamps
particularly interesting as sources for emergency and continuous lighting. The LED lamp thus
looks set for a bright future. And the availability of LED lamps that are compatible with low-
voltage halogen spotlights and mains-driven lamps with conventional lamp holders (see Figure
16) simplifies replacement considerably. Even at their current high prices, the very long lifetimes
of these lamps makes them economical to use. They are therefore particularly practical in
locations where changing lamps is not a straightforward procedure. The same conclusion was
reached by the technical manager of a luxury hotel in which, as so often is the case, power
hungry halogen spotlights were being used to light the corridors day and night. The weekly lamp
inspection is now being simplified by gradually replacing the halogen spotlights by LED spot-
lights, starting with those in difficult-to-access locations. The noticeably bluish light that they
emit will however remain a constant reminder that the lamps were installed before the ‘warm

LED.doc Page 9 of 10
tone’ LED lamps became available, because even if they run uninterrupted day and night the
same LED lamps will still be operating in five years time.

Figure 15: This bathroom lighting arrangement Figure 16: Three lamps were replaced by so-called
consumes 5*50 W of power and two to three lamps reflector CFLs (left) and two by LED lamps – one
per year ‘white’ and the other ‘warm white’ (right); exposure
details as in Figure 15; total power consumption now
about 36 W (i.e. 15 % of the previous load). The CFLs
deliver the brightness, but not the required operational
characteristics; the LED lamps deliver the right
operational characteristics, but not the brightness –
but progress is being made!

If for political reasons a ban on the use of incandescent lamps is introduced (Figure 15), LED
lamps will be able to replace incandescents in those situations where a CFL would fail due to its
cold start behaviour or its sensitivity to frequent switching (Figure 16). But political initiatives
frequently get watered down as the legislative process progresses. It is quite likely that low-
voltage halogen lamps will be excluded because they are not classified as incandescents or
because they are not regarded as replaceable, even though by that time LED lamps will
probably represent a viable and more energy efficient alternative.

[1] and numerous other websites that can be found by

typing ‘LED’ and ‘thermal voltage’ into a search engine
[2] see for example:

LED.doc Page 10 of 10