Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00
Coupon %
From the issuers' perspective, the prepayment risk they retain can
best be hedged using options as these can be used to replicate the duration
and convexity characteristics of the underlying mortgages.
Please refer to terms relating to the provision of this research at the end of the document.
ABN AMRO Bank NV
250 Bishopsgate
London
EC2M 4AA
United Kingdom
R A T E S S T R A T E G Y
Introduction
The past quarter has seen bond market volatility reach record levels exacerbated
by mortgage related activity. However, despite the significance of this activity there
is some confusion surrounding exactly what it means, the factors driving the
behaviour of the mortgage market and the mechanisms by which this behaviour
impacts on other asset classes. This note is designed to answer these questions. It
is aimed at a broad range of investors with most definitions, details and
corroborating evidence contained in the appendix for brevity. To understand the
factors which underlie the behaviour of mortgage players it is best to start from
first principles in regard to mortgage bond price characteristics.1
Convexity
The relationship between a bond’s yield and price is not constant (linear) it changes
with the level of yields. The rate at which the relationship between changes in yield
and changes in price evolves is termed convexity. It is the second derivative
between yield and price. Thus, if a bond has positive convexity, if yields fall in
10bp steps its price will rise at an increasing rate for each 10bp fall in yields. Most
bonds exhibit positive convexity. The main exceptions are mortgage bonds which,
for each 10bp fall in yields the price of the bond rises at a decreasing rate.
1
Negative convexity
In a changing interest rate environment mortgage-backed securities or bonds
(MBS) exhibit characteristics that are the reverse of those seen in standard bullet
bonds and so the term negative convexity is applied to them. This arises as a
direct result of the ability of those taking out mortgages to close an existing
mortgage on their property and open a new one as and when its beneficial. In the
US over 85% of mortgages are fixed rate – most are 30-year mortgages with the
2
interest rate tied to the long bond. Thus, if the long bond yield declines sufficiently
the savings made from refinancing will exceed the costs of re-mortgaging leading
to a flood of refinancing. The mortgagee will repay the existing mortgage early and
take out a new one. If this mortgage forms part of a pool of mortgages against
which an MBS has been issued then the early repayment will mean the holder of
the associated MBS will receive the pre-prepayment. (The exact routing for the
pre-payments will be determined by the structure of individual bonds the mortgage
issuer creates from the pool of underlying mortgages.)
Effectively, the household taking out the mortgage has an embedded put option
and it is this which causes mortgages and assets based upon them to be negatively
convex. Increased competition in the home loan market have caused re-mortgaging
costs to plunge over recent years and as a result the break-even change in yield
1
A more detailed explanation of duration and convexity is contained in the appendix.
2
Note, that although the mortgage rate is tied to the long bond most hedging activity is done using either 5- or 10-year Treasuries or derivative based upon
them.
Pre-payments
There are many models designed to capture the pre-payment effect with the most
widely used prepayment assumption being The Bond Market Association Standard
Prepayment Model. Developed by the Bond Market Association to standardise the
measurement of prepayment risk, it assumes that, for new mortgage loans, the
probability of prepayment increases as rates decline or the mortgage “seasons,” or
ages. Both projected and historical prepayment rates are expressed or quoted as a
percentage of The Bond Market Association Standard Prepayment (PSA). Large
shifts in payment patterns has a big impact on the duration of the associated MBS
and the level of prepayments is primarily determined by the prevailing level of
interest rates relative to the pool of mortgages underlying the MBS. It is therefore
possible to calculate the relationship between yield changes and their effect on the
duration of a MBS. This is done in the chart below for the FreddieMac 4.5% 30
year. The effect is dramatic for yield declines of up to 200bp from the original
coupon level. At that point all those who will re-finance have normally done so
leaving those who through inertia or inability ignore the opportunity to re-finance at
cheaper levels. This leaves duration relatively unaffected for yield declines in excess
of 200bp. The impact of a rise in yields from the MBS coupon level is less dramatic
as higher yields do not encourage pre-payments and so cash flows remain closely
tied to that envisaged by the MBS structure.
Chart 2 : Duration of the FreddieMac 4.5% 30yr for various yield changes
8
Duration
7
Change in yield in bp
0
-400 -300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400
Source: Bloomberg
An alternative way of looking at this is to see how the weighted average life of a
30-year MBS from the same issuer changes depending upon the coupon level. The
wider the positive spread between the MBS’s coupon and prevailing yield levels, the
shorter the average life of the MBS.
Coupon Weighted
PSA2 Price Yield
average life
It is important to remember that although the various structures allow the MBS
issuer to apportion some of the pre-payment risk between themselves and various
investor classes it does not diminish the overall pre-payment risk associated with
MBS securities. This risk has to be managed by either the issuer of MBS (if the MBS
has been stripped of the some of its pre-payment characteristics) or the investor (if
the MBS retains pre-payment risk).
End investors have a greater propensity to hedge their positions directly in cash
markets such as the Treasury market but standard swaps are also used
extensively. For example, when yields are rising these investors tend to sell
Treasuries or pay fixed thus compounding the effect of the hedging being
implemented by the mortgage issuers. It is interesting to note that the bond rally
witnessed since the start of 2002 has shortened the duration of many outstanding
MBS to the degree that the duration characteristic of the 5-year Treasury is a closer
match than that of the 10-year Treasury the traditional hedging tool. As a result
more of the recent hedging activity has been conducted in the 5 year than
previously leading to heightened volatility in this area of the curve.
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
The increases of MBS outstanding relative to the Treasury market has been
especially marked despite the recent rise in the federal government deficit. This
relative expansion of MBS is even more extreme once the effect of the increase in
central bank holdings of Treasuries are taken into account. Large scale intervention
in the foreign exchange markets means as of 1st July $1347bn of Treasury
securities are held by foreign investors, of this $713bn is held by foreign official
bodies with $502 held in Treasury bonds – some 16% of the total marketable
Treasuries outstanding. The majority of these holdings are concentrated in the
short and belly areas of the curve. As the rationale for the investment decision by
central banks is markedly divergent from that of the private sector, central banks
are usually forced to hold certain maturities for reserve management reasons, their
increased holdings can impact on market liquidity.
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
Treasury Mortgage
Methods of hedging
From the issuers’ perspective the prepayment risk they retain can best be hedged
using options as these can be used to replicate the duration and convexity
characteristics of the underlying mortgages. For example, convexity can be added
to a portfolio with the purchase of out of the money long call and put options – a
strangle. The underlying instrument for the strangle is usually one with a similar
duration to that of the MBS being hedged. The most popular underlying instruments
are 10- and 5 year Treasuries. The reason for this is that strangles only come into
the money (are profitable) if interest rates move a large amount. The exact amount
is determined by the strike prices of the options used for the strangle, which are
set by the MBS issuer when buying the strangle but are usually in the range of
25bp. Similarly, pre-payments only accelerate if prevailing yield levels shift
significantly. An alternative strategy is to replace the refinanced mortgages by
purchasing the new mortgages which come on stream as households re-mortgage
at lower rates.
Options:
Index 4.4
11000
4.6
9000
4.8
7000 5.0
5.2
5000
5.4
3000
5.6
%
1000 5.8
Aug-01 Nov-01 Feb-02 May-02 Aug-02 Nov-02 Feb-03 May-03
A key question going forward is what is the prepayment risk if yields remain in the
current range or move higher as we expect? A long-term chart provides a clearer
indication of what tends to occur in this type of environment. In the chart below we
have plotted the ratio of mortgages taken out for refinancing against those taken
out for home purchase. The chart highlights that in the late 1990s as long rates
were rising re-finance levels fell towards the same level as those for house
purchases and remained at these low levels even when long rates had started to
fall. Only once long yields had declined 100bp from their highs did re-financing
levels accelerate, reflecting the costs involved in re-financing. Once this point had
been breached every downward move in yields led to an increase in refinance levels
as each incremental decline in yields opened up a new set of households for which
refinancing became worthwhile. The reverse is true now, the rise in yields means it
is no longer beneficial for anyone to re-mortgage and so refinancing will remain
depressed. Levels will stay low unless long yields fall to 4% or below – something
which seems very unlikely in the current environment. As a result the MBS issuers
only have to manage the convexity of their existing holdings. All the mortgages
taken out in the last period of heavy re-financing when long bond yields broke
through 4.5% are now out of the money and so suffer limited pre-payment risk.
6.0
5
100bp
Inverse % 6.5
0
Aug-98 Aug-99 Aug-00 Aug-01 Aug-02 Aug-03
This being the case, convexity hedging of MBS based on these mortgages will also
slow at an increasing rate as yields rise. Chart 1 at the start of this piece and the
table below illustrate that the need to hedge for negative convexity as yields move
above the coupon level of the MBS is much lower as compared to when yields fall
below the coupon level. For example the duration of the FreddieMac 4.5% 30yr
increases 0.5 years from 6.5 years to 7.0 year if yields rise by 100bp. The
corresponding fall in duration for a 100bp yield decline is over three times as much
at 1.6 years from 6.5 to 4.9 years. Thus all outstanding mortgages that were
refinanced when long bond yields were in the 5.00 - 4.80 % range will require
much less hedging as yields rise above 5.50%.
Table 4 : Duration of the FreddieMac 4.5% 30yr for various yield changes
Duration 7.45 7.4 7.3 7.0 6.5 4.9 3 1.8 1.2 1.1
Yield change 400 300 200 100 0 -100 -150 -200 -300 -400
However, this is only part of the story. The rise in yields will bring many more
mortgages which had coupon levels that were well above current market levels
closer to prevailing market yields as the table and chart below illustrate. Thus,
although mortgage hedging levels will decline for those mortgages which were
taken out during the recent spate of re-financing the effect of this will be swamped
by the volume of mortgages that are moving towards having coupons at current
market levels. The 5.5 to 6.0% coupon levels have particularly large amounts
outstanding suggesting that hedging activity will continue to weigh heavily on the
market for an extended time. Only once yields rise above 6.5% is hedging activity
likely to fall markedly from current levels.
Table 5 : Amounts outstanding for each issuer per coupon level (USD bn)
Coupon FNMA FHLMC GNMA-1 GNMA-2 Total
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00
Coupon %
Appendix
MBS issuers
The main agencies for this are The Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie
Mae), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac), though the
Federal Home Loan Bank System, the Federal Farm Credit Bank System are also
important players. They accomplishes their mission by operating in the secondary
rather than the primary mortgage market purchasing mortgage loans from
mortgage lenders such as mortgage companies, savings institutions, credit unions,
and commercial banks, thereby replenishing those institutions' supply of mortgage
funds. They then either package these loans into Mortgage-Backed Securities
(MBS), which they guarantees for full and timely payment of principal and interest,
or purchase the loans for cash and retain them in their portfolio. The agencies
obtain the funds to finance its mortgage purchases and other business activities by
selling debt securities in the international capital markets.
Duration (or Macaulay duration): The weighted average maturity of all a bond’s
remaining cash flows. It is calculated by multiplying the present value of each cash
flow by the length of time in years until those cash flows are received. These values
are then summed together and divided by the sum of the present value of all the
cash flows. Thus, if a cash flow comes in earlier or later than implied by the bonds
structure the change in the payment date will have a direct impact on the duration
of the bond. Duration is closely related to modified duration which gives an
approximation of the relationship between price and yield. (MD is the first
derivative of price with respect to yield). Thus, any change in payment dates will
also impact modified duration and so the relationship between the effect of a
change in yield on price.
Convexity: Even if a bond’s cash flows do not deviate from those scheduled in its
terms and conditions the relationship between changes in yield and the impact on
prices is not constant (linear) it changes with the level of yields. The rate at which
the relationship between a given change in yield and its effect on price evolves is
termed convexity. It is the second derivative between yield and price. Thus, if a
bond has positive convexity, if yields fall in 10bp steps its price will rise at an
increasing rate for each 10bp fall in yields. Most bonds exhibit positive convexity.
The main exception to this are mortgage bonds.
As the underlying mortgage loans are paid off by the homeowners, the investors
receive payments of interest and principal. The most basic mortgage securities,
known as “pass throughs,” or participation certificates (PCs), represent a direct
ownership interest in a pool of mortgage loans. More complex type of mortgage
security known as a Collateralised Mortgage Obligation (CMO) allow cash flows to
be directed so that different classes of securities with different maturities and
The final tranche of a CMO often takes the form of a Z-bond, also known as an
accrual bond or accretion bond. Holders of these securities receive no cash until the
earlier tranches are paid in full. During the period that the other tranches are
outstanding, the periodic interest accruals are added to the initial face amount of
the bond but are not paid to investors. When the prior tranches are retired, the Z-
bond receives coupon payments on its higher principal balance, plus any principal
prepayments from the underlying mortgage loans. The existence of a Z-bond
tranche helps stabilise the cashflow patterns in the other tranches. In a changing
interest rate environment, however, the value of the Z-bond itself tends to be more
volatile. As the CMO has evolved, some modifications in the classes of bonds have
become more prevalent. The planned amortisation class (PAC) and targeted
amortisation class (TAC), for example, were designed to reduce investors’
prepayment risk by establishing a sinking-fund structure. PAC and TAC bonds
assure to varying degrees that their investors will receive payments over a
predetermined time period under various prepayment scenarios. Although PAC and
TAC bonds are similar, PAC bonds tend to provide more stable cash flow under a
greater number of prepayment scenarios than TAC bonds.
The existence of a PAC or TAC tranche can create higher levels of risk for other
tranches in the CMO because the stability of the PAC or TAC tranche is achieved by
creating at least one other tranche—known as a companion bond or a support or
non-PAC bond—which absorbs the variability of collateral principal cash flows.
Because companion bonds have a high degree of average life variability, they
generally pay a higher yield. Companion bonds are not always labelled as such,
however. Moreover, a TAC bond can have some of the prepayment variability of a
companion bond if there is also a PAC bond in the issue.
A Principal Only (PO) is created by stripping the coupon interest from the
underlying mortgages. Because it carries no coupon, a PO is extremely sensitive to
prepayments. Higher prepayments lead to a higher yield. In contrast, an Interest
Only (IO) is the coupon payments from the underlying mortgages. IOs are usually
sold at a deep discount relative to a notional principal amount. IOs increase in
value when prepayment rates decline. Finally, the floating-rate tranche has all the
attributes of multiclass securities except that coupon rates are periodically reset to
a margin over the index. The key to analyzing a floating-rate CMO is understanding
the interaction between rate caps and prepayments. Another variation of the CMO
structure is the inverse floater, which has a coupon rate that moves inversely with
the index rate.
Measuring the risk if things go wrong: The main measure of used by market
participants to asses the outstanding risk the MBS issuers face is the duration gap.
The duration gap uses prepayment and interest rate models to generate an option
adjusted measure of the difference, in months, between the average duration of
the mortgages held in portfolio and the liabilities that fund those mortgages. This is
done in most cases on monthly average basis.
Copyright 2003 ABN AMRO Bank N.V. and affiliated companies ("ABN AMRO"). All rights reserved.
This material was prepared by the ABN AMRO affiliate named on the cover or inside cover page. It is provided for informational
purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any security or other financial instrument. While
based on information believed to be reliable, no guarantee is given that it is accurate or complete. While we endeavour to
update on a reasonable basis the information and opinions contained herein, there may be regulatory, compliance or other
reasons that prevent us from doing so. The opinions, forecasts, assumptions, estimates, derived valuations and target price(s)
contained in this material are as of the date indicated and are subject to change at any time without prior notice. The
investments referred to may not be suitable for the specific investment objectives, financial situation or individual needs of
recipients and should not be relied upon in substitution for the exercise of independent judgement. ABN AMRO may from time
to time act as market maker, where permissible under applicable laws, or, as an agent or principal, buy or sell securities,
warrants, futures, options, derivatives or other financial instruments referred to herein. ABN AMRO or its officers, directors,
employee benefit programmes or employees, including persons involved in the preparation or issuance of this material, may
from time to time have long or short positions in securities, warrants, futures, options, derivatives or other financial
instruments referred to in this material. ABN AMRO may at any time solicit or provide investment banking, commercial banking,
credit, advisory or other services to the issuer of any security referred to herein. Accordingly, information may be available to
ABN AMRO, which is not reflected in this material, and ABN AMRO may have acted upon or used the information prior to or
immediately following its publication. Within the last three years, ABN AMRO may also have acted as manager or co-manager
for a public offering of securities of issuers referred to herein. The stated price of any securities mentioned herein is as of the
date indicated and is not a representation that any transaction can be effected at this price. Neither ABN AMRO nor other
persons shall be liable for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages, including lost
profits arising in any way from the information contained in this material. This material is for the use of intended recipients only
and the contents may not be reproduced, redistributed, or copied in whole or in part for any purpose without ABN AMRO's prior
express consent. In any jurisdiction in which distribution to private/retail customers would require registration or licensing of
the distributor which the distributor does not currently have, this document is intended solely for distribution to professional
and institutional investors.
Should you require additional information please contact your local ABN AMRO account representative, unless governing laws
dictate otherwise.
Australia: Any report referring to equity securities is distributed in Australia by ABN AMRO Equities Australia Ltd (ABN 84 002
768 701), a participating organisation of the Australian Stock Exchange Ltd. Any report referring to fixed income securities is
distributed in Australia by ABN AMRO Bank NV (Australia Branch) (ARBN 079 478 612). Australian investors should note that
this document was prepared for wholesale investors only.
Canada: The securities mentioned in this material are available only in accordance with applicable securities laws and may not
be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions. Persons in Canada requiring further information should contact ABN AMRO Incorporated.
Hong Kong: This document is being distributed in Hong Kong by, and is attributable to, ABN AMRO Asia Limited which is
regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong.
India: Shares traded on stock exchanges within the Republic of India may only be purchased by different categories of resident
Indian investors, Foreign Institutional Investors registered with The Securities and Exchange Board of India ("SEBI") or
individuals of Indian national origin resident outside India called Non Resident Indians ("NRIs") and Overseas Corporate Bodies
("OCBs"), predominantly owned by such persons or Persons of Indian Origin (PIO). Any recipient of this document wanting
additional information or to effect any transaction in Indian securities or financial instrument mentioned herein must do so by
contacting a representative of ABN AMRO Asia Equities (India) limited.
Italy: Persons in Italy requiring further information should contact ABN AMRO Bank N.V. Milan Branch.
Japan: This report is being distributed in Japan by ABN AMRO Securities Japan Ltd to institutional investors only.
New Zealand: This document is distributed in New Zealand by ABN AMRO Equities NZ Limited a New Zealand Stock Exchange
Firm.
Russia: The Russian securities market is associated with several substantial risks, legal, economic and political, and high
volatility. There is a relatively high measure of legal uncertainty concerning rights, duties and legal remedies in the Russian
Federation. Russian laws and regulations governing investments in securities markets may not be sufficiently developed or may
be subject to inconsistent or arbitrary interpretation or application. Russian securities are often not issued in physical form and
registration of ownership may not be subject to a centralised system. Registration of ownership of certain types of securities
may not be subject to standardised procedures and may even be effected on an ad hoc basis. The value of investments in
Russian securities may be affected by fluctuations in available currency rates and exchange control regulations.
Singapore: This document is distributed in Singapore by ABN AMRO Asia Securities (Singapore) Private Limited to clients who
fall within the description of persons in Regulation 49(5) of the Securities and Futures (Licensing and Conduct of Business)
Regulations 2002. Investors should note that this material was prepared for professional investors only.
United Kingdom: Equity research is distributed in the United Kingdom by ABN AMRO Equities (UK) Limited, which is registered
in England (No 2475694), and is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. All other research is distributed
in the United Kingdom by ABN AMRO Bank NV, London Branch, which is authorised by the Dutch Central Bank and by the
Financial Services Authority; and regulated by the Financial Services Authority for the conduct of UK business. The investments
and services contained herein are not available to private customers in the United Kingdom.
United States: Distribution of this document in the United States or to US persons is intended to be solely to major institutional
investors as defined in Rule 15a-6(a)(2) under the US Securities Act of 1934. All US persons that receive this document by
their acceptance thereof represent and agree that they are a major institutional investor and understand the risks involved in
executing transactions in securities. Any US recipient of this document wanting additional information or to effect any
transaction in any security or financial instrument mentioned herein, must do so by contacting a registered representative of
ABN AMRO Incorporated, Park Avenue Plaza, 55 East 52nd Street, New York, N.Y. 10055, US, tel + 1 212 409 1000, fax +1
212 409 5222.
1
Material means all research information contained in any form including but not limited to hard copy, electronic form,
presentations, e-mail, SMS or WAP.