Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Financial Management
Term Project Report
Financial Ratio Analysis
Financial Ratio Analysis of SHELL and PSO on
the basis of financial record of 2007 and 2008
Submitted To:
Amyn Wahid
Submitted By:
Farhan Ahmed
(2008-1-25-8953)
Israr UlHaque
(2008-1-25-8649)
We also like to thank you for not making the class boring and for imparting us knowledge and
wisdom in the light of your experience.
Table of Content
Contents
2. RATIO ANALYSIS....................................................................................................................4
7. APPENDIX ............................................................................................................................... A
Shell is a superior brand name with over a 100-year history in the subcontinent. Shell in Pakistan
has played a leading role in abridging the growing energy demand gap in the country and has a
stake in Pakistan Refinery, LPG distribution and a shareholding in the white oil pipeline. The
primary goal of the company is to position itself as the preferred oil and Gas Company in
Pakistan, leading the field in its commitment to customer service, quality of products, safety and
environmental protection. Over the last decade, Shell Pakistan has developed a robust program
of social investment, which supports organizations and initiatives in areas of health, education,
welfare, community development, heritage and environment. Our Shell Tameer Program,
introduced in 2003, today exists as one of the foremost efforts to facilitate youth
entrepreneurship in the country and has engaged more than 45,000 young people through
workshops, seminars, and community engagements. We continue to strive toward operational
excellence and remain committed to growing our business in Pakistan.
Shell Pakistan Limited (Shell Pakistan) is engaged in marketing of compressed natural gas and
petroleum. The company provides different types of lubricating oil. Shell Pakistan caters to
businesses and motorists. The company for businesses provides Shell cards, aviation customer
service, exploration and production, transport, liquefied petroleum gas and industrial operations
for power, automotive and sugar. Shell Pakistan for motorists provides customer service, car care
tips, shell Helix motor oil and Shell advance motorcycle oil. The company also participates in
motor sports like formula one and Moto GP by tying up with Audi, Ferrari and Ducati. Shell
Pakistan is headquartered at Karachi, Pakistan.
Our efforts to promote business excellence are not just limited to our products and services, but
are also included in the way we do business. Over the past year, Shell Pakistan has made
commendable strides in introducing global technical standards into the industry. In 2007, Shell
Pakistan had inducted eight such vehicles, with the fleet expected to double in number by the end
of 2008. In order to further strengthen and streamline our internal processes and to increase
efficiencies, Shell Pakistan has embarked on Shell Group’s Global ‘Downstream-One’ journey.
The ultimate goal of Downstream-One is to reduce business complexity and increase operational
efficiency in order to reduce costs and increase competitiveness, while simultaneously enhancing
Pakistan State Oil, the largest oil marketing company in the country, is currently engaged in
storage, distribution and marketing of various POL products. The company’s current value of Rs.
75 billion, its 82.1% share in the black oil market and 61.2% share in the white oil market, alone
speak volumes about its success.
The company’s astounding growth in terms of sales and turnover, combined with its status of
being the first Pakistani Public Sector Company to become a member of the World Economic
Forum (WEF), and winning the “Karachi Stock Exchange Top Companies Award” has made
PSO a notable company world over.
PSO has the widest strategic oil distribution network. This network comprises of 29 storage
depots and 9 installations, 860,000 MTs of capacity i.e. almost 81% of total national storage,
numerous pipe lines network and equity partnership in White Oil Pipeline Project (WOPP) from
Karachi to Mehmood Kot.
A most efficient product movement system for its POL products facilitates the operations at
PSO. This system includes a fleet of 6000 tank Lorries, tank wagons and pipelines. With the
inception of white oil pipeline (WOPP) the pattern of supplies from Karachi has changed
drastically as the entire white oil movement from Karachi has been switched over from tank
lorries to pipelines. Moreover, to make this system more efficient and effective, new pilfer-proof
tank Lorries equipped with satellite tracking system have been introduced.
With its 3612 distribution outlets, PSO has the largest network in the country. Out of these, 1,610
outlets have been upgraded as per the New Vision Retail Program, with most modern facilities
like electronic dispensing units, convenience stores, business centers, Easy Payment Centers and
customer friendly staff to provide unmatched and diverse services to its customers, all of which
are comparable to international practices.
The fact that PSO serves 2.8 million retail customers on daily basis, along with 2000 industrial
units and business houses, is indicative of its vast customer base. The company has also been
meeting the fuel needs of various government entities, armed forces, railways, agriculture sector,
IPPs and industrial units. PSO also provides Jet Fuel to Refueling Facilities at 9 airports in
Pakistan and ship fuel at 3 ports.
1. LIQUIDITY RATIOS
a. CURRENT RATIO
Shows a company’s ability to pay off its current liabilities from its current assets.
Formula= ⁄
Shell
2007 Current Assets 20041859 Current 19612115
Liabilities
2008 Current Assets 30220209 Current 23307811
Liabilities
PSO
2007 Current Assets 6251327 Current 51385727
Liabilities
2008 Current Assets 115878692 Current 93736220
Liabilities
1.40 1.30
1.22
1.20
1.24
Ratio
1.00
1.02
0.80
2007 2008
Shell 1.02 1.30
Pso 1.22 1.24
Shell’s Current ratio increased significantly as compared to previous year although the volume
of current liabilities increased as a whole due to increase in trade payables but current assets
grew at a rapid rate. The reason behind this was the significant change in the value of stock in
trade. This is due to higher prices of petroleum products during that time and the company is
using FIFO method for its inventory. Also, the working capital requirements from the GOP was
increased for MNC’s.
EXTERNAL COMPARISON
Shell current ratio increased more rapidly as compared to PSO because PSO current liabilities
grew at the same level as their current assets. PSO benefited from not being an MNC.
b. QUICK RATIO
Shows a firm’s ability to meet its current liabilities with its most liquid assets.
SHELL
2007 Current 20041859 Current 19612115 Inventory 8244054
Assets Liabilities
2008 Current 30220209 Current 23307811 Inventory 18095523
Assets Liabilities
PSO
2007 Current 62513273 Current 51385727 Inventory 29562055
Assets Liabilities
2008 Current 115878692 Current 93736220 Inventory 62360067
Assets Liabilities
0.60 0.57
Ratio
0.60
0.50 0.52
0.40
2007 2008
Shell 0.60 0.52
Pso 0.64 0.57
INTERNAL COMPARISON
Shell’s Quick ratio decreased due to higher prices of petroleum products, as the volume allocated
for inventories was higher.
EXTERNAL COMPARISON
There is no significant difference between the decreases of the ratio of both the companies as
compared to their previous benchmarks.
2. LEVERAGE RATIO
Shows the percentage of the firm’s assets that are supported by debt financing.
Shell
2007 Total Debts 19751156 Total Assets 29211927
2008 Total Debts 26053221 Total Assets 39664859
PSO
2007 Total Debts 53798098 Total Assets 74737315
2008 Total Debts 96144966 Total Assets 127110020
Value 0.90
0.80 0.76
0.72
Ratio
0.70
0.68 0.66
0.60
0.50
2007 2008
Shell 0.68 0.66
Pso 0.72 0.76
INTERNAL COMPARISON
Shell’s total debt increased in absolute amount but not at a pace of changing total assets that’s
why a minor fall in debt ratio is seen.
EXTERNAL COMPARISON
Pso’s total debt increased at a higher pace than its total assets mainly due to the change in current
liabilities. Overall PSO has become more leveraged than shell. The main reason behind this was
the higher amount of GOP’s receivables were not paid to PSO and to tackle with cashflow
problems the company had to finance more than previous.
Shell
2007 Total Debts 19751156 Total Equity 9460771
2008 Total Debts 26053221 Total Equity 13611638
PSO
2007 Total Debts 53798098 Total Equity 20929217
2008 Total Debts 96144966 Total Equity 30965054
3.10
Value
3.00
2.57
2.50
Ratio
2.00 1.91
2.09
1.50
2007 2008
Shell 2.09 1.91
Pso 2.57 3.10
INTERNAL COMPARISON
Shell’s debt to equity ratio decreased due to increase in its retained earnings.
EXTERNAL COMPARISON
Shell has maintained its debt to equity ratio better than PSO whose ratio has fluctuated
apparently than the previous year. This effect can be seen in the previous total debt’s ratio. The
main reason behind that was to finance the excessive receivables not yet paid by GOP.
3. COVERAGE RATIO
Formula= ⁄
Shell
2007 EBIT 1166405 Interest 909919
Expense
2008 EBIT 8481359 Interest 970267
Expense
PSO
15.00
10.00
6.86 8.74
Ratio
5.00
1.28
0.00
2007 2008
Shell 1.28 8.74
Pso 6.86 16.41
INTERNAL COMPARISON
Shell has significantly improved its time interest earned ratio due to the massive increase in its
operating income.
EXTERNAL COMPARISON
Although shell interest earned ratio increased significantly but it is still 50 percent as compared
to Pso who is at good position.
4. EFFICIENCY RATIOS
a. RECEIVABLE TURNOVER
Formula=
⁄/
PSO
2007 Credit Sales 411057592 Avg A/R 12657917
2008 Credit Sales 583213959 Avg A/R 23752347
34.43
Value
35.00 32.47
30.00
Ratio
25.00 26.53
24.55
20.00
2007 2008
Shell 26.53 34.43
Pso 32.47 24.55
INTERNAL COMPARISON
Shell has managed to control its receivable volume with the growing sales level. That’s why a
increase in the ratio has been seen which shows its efficiency in collecting receivables while at
the same time increasing its sales volume.
EXTERNAL COMPARISON
Pso’ s ratio has been deteriorated as compared to previous year which shows its relative
inefficiency in collecting receivables as compared to Shell. The main amount of receivables
which had affected the figures is from Government of Pakistan and IPP’s.
Formula= ⁄
Shell
2007 Days 365 Receivable 26.53
Turnover
2008 Days 365 Receivable 34.43
Turnover
PSO
2007 Days 365 Receivable 32.47
Turnover
2008 Days 365 Receivable 24.55
Turnover
14.00
12.00
Ratio
10.00 11.24
10.60
8.00
2007 2008
Shell 13.76 10.60
Pso 11.24 14.87
INTERNAL COMPARISON
Shell has managed to control its receivable volume with the growing sales level. That’s why a
increase in the ratio has been seen which shows its efficiency in collecting receivables while at
the same time increasing its sales volume.
Pso’ s ratio has been deteriorated as compared to previous year which shows its relative
inefficiency in collecting receivables as compared to Shell.
Shell
2007 COGS 108664932 Avg Inventory 9111970
2008 COGS 124694471 Avg Inventory 13169788.5
PSO
2007 COGS 337446896 Avg Inventory 28865344
2008 COGS 465254907 Avg Inventory 45961061
12.50 11.93
11.00 11.69
Ratio
10.12
9.50
9.47
8.00
2007 2008
Shell 11.93 9.47
Pso 11.69 10.12
Shell’s situation in that particular section has deteriorated significantly because of the large
accumulation of inventory, may be not in physical quantities but in rupee amount due to higher
oil prices. This can adversely affects the company earnings in the future.
EXTERNAL COMPARISON
In comparison with Shell Pso has maintained its inventory turnover ratio more efficiently
although a decrease in ratio can be seen there also.
Average number of days before inventory is turned into accounts receivable through
sales.
Shell
2007 Days 365 Inventory 11.93
Turnover
2008 Days 365 Inventory 9.47
Turnover
PSO
2007 Days 365 Inventory 11.69
Turnover
2008 Days 365 Inventory 10.12
Turnover
32.00 31.22
30.00 30.61
28.00
2007 2008
Shell 30.61 38.55
Pso 31.22 36.06
INTERNAL COMPARISON
Shell’s situation in that particular section has deteriorated significantly because of the large
accumulation of inventory, may be not in physical quantities but in rupee amount due to higher
oil prices. This can adversely affects the company earnings in the future.
EXTERNAL COMPARISON
In comparison with Shell Pso has maintained its inventory turnover ratio more efficiently
although a decrease in ratio can be seen there also.
Indicates the overall effectiveness of the firm in utilizing its assets to generate sales.
Shell
2007 Net Sales 130129844 Avg Total 28752163
Assets
2008 Net Sales 157626491 Avg Total 34438393
Assets
6.00
5.78
5.67
5.00
4.58
Ratio
4.53
4.00
3.00
2007 2008
Shell 4.53 4.58
Pso 5.67 5.78
INTERNAL COMPARISON
Shell Total asset turnover remained at the same level as the previous year.
EXTERNAL COMPARISON
Pso’s ratio also maintained at its previous level but Pso is more efficient in utilizing its assets
overall.
5. PROFITABILITY RATIOS
Indicates the efficiency of the operations and the firm’s pricing policies.
PSO
2007 Gross Profit 12259430 Net Sales 411057592
2008 Gross Profit 30023626 Net Sales 583213959
9.61%
10.00%
Ratio
4.90%
5.15%
2.98%
0.00%
2007 2008
Shell 4.90% 9.61%
Pso 2.98% 5.15%
INTERNAL COMPARISON
GPM of Shell has doubled from the previous year which is a good sign for company’s
operations. That might because of increasing oil prices.
EXTERNAL COMPARISON
GPM of Pso also doubled because of the same effect but the overall level of Shell is far higher
than Pso.
Indicates the firm’s profitability after taking account of all expenses and income taxes.
PSO
2007 Net Profit 4689798 Net Sales 411057592
2008 Net Profit 14053795 Net Sales 583213959
2.50% 2.41%
2.00%
1.50%
Ratio
1.00% 1.14%
0.50% 0.54%
0.00%
2007 2008
Shell 0.54% 3.26%
Pso 1.14% 2.41%
INTERNAL COMPARISON
Shell’s NPM has improved a lot from the previous year level. This must be the same effect as
seen in the company’s GPM.
EXTERNAL COMPARISON
Pso’s NPM has also improved but not as significant as Shell’s. In fact the company was in better
position as compared to shell previous year.
Indicates the profitability on the assets of the firm (after all expenses and taxes).
Shell
2007 Net Income 706659 Avg Total 28752163
Assets
2008 Net Income 5137094 Avg Total 34438393
Assets
PSO
2007 Net Income 4689798 Net Sales 72452919.5
2008 Net Income 14053795 Net Sales 100923667.5
24%
Value
14.92%
16%
Ratio
13.93%
8% 6.47%
2.46%
0%
2007 2008
Shell 2.46% 14.92%
Pso 6.47% 13.93%
INTERNAL COMPARISON
The company’s ROI has also improved as seen in the previous ratios.
EXTERNAL COMPARISON
Indicates the profitability to the shareholders of the firm (after all expenses and taxes).
Shell
2007 Net Income 706659 Avg Equity 9808758.5
2008 Net Income 5137094 Avg Equity 11536204.5
PSO
2007 Net Income 4689798 Avg Equity 20876138
2008 Net Income 14053795 Avg Equity 25952135.5
40%
30%
22.46%
Ratio
20%
10%
7.20%
0%
2007 2008
Shell 7.20% 44.53%
Pso 22.46% 54.15%
INTERNAL COMPARISON
EXTERNAL COMPARISON
Despite Shell’s massive increase in ROE, Pso is still ahead in this respect.
Formula= %&
&
⁄$. & 33 5 !
Shell
2007 Profit After 706659000 No. of Common 54790313
Taxation shares
Outstanding
2008 Profit After 5137094000 No. of Common 54790313
Taxation shares
Outstanding
PSO
2007 Profit After 4689798000 No. of Common 171518901
Taxation shares
Outstanding
2008 Profit After 14053795000 No. of Common 171518901
Taxation shares
Outstanding
60.00
Ratio
40.00
27.34
20.00
12.90
0.00
2007 2008
Shell 12.90 93.76
Pso 27.34 81.94
EXTERNAL COMPARISON
EPS of both companies has almost no significant difference but improvement is seen in Shell’s
performance which was far below from Pso’s level previous year.
Formula= 67 %
% 5⁄
% 5
Shell
2007 Market Price 410.05 Earnings Per 12.90
Per Share Share
2008 Market Price 417 Earnings Per 93.76
Per Share Share
PSO
2007 Market Price 391.45 Earnings Per 27.34
Per Share Share
2008 Market Price 417.24 Earnings Per 81.94
Per Share Share
20.00
Ratio
14.32
10.00 4.45
5.09
0.00
2007 2008
Shell 31.79 4.45
Pso 14.32 5.09
INTERNAL COMPARISON
Price per earnings ratio has deteriorated but when compared to previous year’s EPS, it is evident
that is not because of decrease in price share but because of significant increase in earnings of
company. In summary shareholders did not lose confidence but enjoyed increased earnings.
EXTERNAL COMPARISON
Likewise Pso’s P/E ratio has also decreased almost to the same level as of Shell’s.
Non-current assets
Fixed assets 6826848 6579993
Long-term investments 2134783 2015535
Long-term loans and advances 146381 182579
Long-term deposits and prepayments 201718 110994
Long-term debtors 134920 328727
Deferred taxation - net 280967
Total Non-current assets 9444650 9498795
Current assets
Stores and spares 13328 30286
Stock-in-trade 18095523 8244054
Trade debts 4904940 4251325
Loans and advances 47029 42720
Trade deposits and short-term 207864 140239
prepayments
Other receivables 6079111 5970763
Taxation 219715
Cash and bank balances 872414 814530
Total Current assets 30220209 19713632
Equity
Share capital 547904 547904
Reserves 2233026 2233026
Unappropriated profit 10830708 6679841
Total Equity 13611638 9460771
LIABILITIES
Non-current liabilities
Deferred taxation - net 51574
Liabilities against assets subject to finance lease 2216 547
Long-term loan 2500000
Asset retirement obligation 191620 138494
Total Non-current liabilities 2745410 139041
Current liabilities
Current maturity of liabilities against assets subject to finance 56742 32203
lease
Short-term running finances utilized under mark-up 4338339 725836
arrangements
Short-term loans 1500000 6810000
Trade and other payables 16483008 11912496
Mark-up accrued 157268 131580
Taxation 772454
Total Current liabilities 23307811 19612115
10,090,507 1,297,240
Other operating income 306,453 215,322
10,396,960 1,512,562
Other operating expenses 1,915,601 377,978
7,511,092 256,486
Share of profit of associate - net of tax 212,248 122,250
Profit before taxation 7,723,340 378,736
Taxation 2,586,246 327,923
Rupees Rupees
Earnings per share 93.76 12.9
Non-Current Assets
Property, plant and 7,460,549 8,012,317
equipment
Intangibles 105,502 126,212
Long term investments 2,701,097 2,990,591
Long term loans, 477,745 627,972
advances and
receivables
Long term deposits and 79,098 65,913
Prepayments
Deferred Taxes 407,337 401,037
Total Non-Current 11,231,328 12,224,042
Assets
Current Assets
Stores, spare parts and 115,814 127,891
loose tools
Stock-in-trade 62,360,067 29,562,055
Trade debts 33,904,728 13,599,966
Loans and advances 396,220 365,974
Deposits and short term 401,433 1,583,913
prepayments
Other receivables 15,681,790 15,751,198
Cash and bank balances 3,018,640 1,522,276
Total Current Assets 115,878,692 62,513,273
EQUITY
Share Capital 1,715,190 1,715,190
Reserves 29,249,864 19,224,027
Total Equity 30,965,054 20,939,217
Liabilities
Non-Current Liabilities
Long term deposits 834,598 768,308
Retirement and other service 1,574,148 1,644,063
benefits
Total Non-Current Liabilities 2,408,746 2,412,371
Current Liabilities
Trade and other payables 81,067,565 41,431,075
Provisions 726,116 688,512
Accrued interest / mark-up 217,928 131,961
Short term borrowings 10,997,908 9,064,781
Taxes payable 726,703 69,398
Total Current Liabilities 93,736,220 51,385,727
2008 2007
Sales 583,213,959 411,057,592
Sales Tax 74,249,472 52,418,310
Inland freight equalization margin 13,685,954 8,932,956
Operating costs
Transportation costs 337,886 369,328
Distribution and marketing expenses 3,264,599 2,745,289
Administrative expenses 1,160,741 1,002,712
Depreciation 1,119,137 1,098,157
Amortization 47,689 41,908
Other operating expenses 3,352,969 755,420
Total Operating Cost 9,283,021 6,012,814
21,083,094 6,791,674
Share of profit of associates 294,318 330,306
Profit before taxation 21,377,412 7,121,980
Taxation 7,323,617 2,432,182
Rupees Rupees
Earnings per share 81.94 27.34
Non-current assets
Fixed assets 6826848 6579993 17.21 22.52
Long-term investments 2134783 2015535 5.38 6.90
Long-term loans and advances 146381 182579 0.37 0.63
Long-term deposits and prepayments 201718 110994 0.51 0.38
Long-term debtors 134920 328727 0.34 1.13
Deferred taxation - net 280967 0.96
Total Non-current assets 9444650 9498795 23.81 32.52
Current assets
Stores and spares 13328 30286 0.03 0.10
Stock-in-trade 18095523 8244054 45.62 28.22
Trade debts 4904940 4251325 12.37 14.55
Loans and advances 47029 42720 0.12 0.15
Trade deposits and short-term 207864 140239 0.52 0.48
prepayments
Other receivables 6079111 5970763 15.33 20.44
Taxation 219715 0.75
Cash and bank balances 872414 814530 2.20 2.79
Total Current assets 30220209 19713632 76.19 67.48
Equity
Share capital 547904 547904 1.38 1.88
Reserves 2233026 2233026 5.63 7.64
Unappropriated profit 10830708 6679841 27.31 22.87
Total Equity 13611638 9460771 34.32 32.39
LIABILITIES
Non-current liabilities
Deferred taxation - net 51574 0.13 0.00
Liabilities against assets subject to finance lease 2216 547 0.01 0.00
Long-term loan 2500000 6.30 0.00
Asset retirement obligation 191620 138494 0.48 0.47
Total Non-current liabilities 2745410 139041 6.92 0.48
Current liabilities
Current maturity of liabilities against assets subject to finance 56742 32203 0.14 0.11
lease
Short-term running finances utilized under mark-up 4338339 725836 10.94 2.48
arrangements
Short-term loans 1500000 6810000 3.78 23.31
Trade and other payables 16483008 11912496 41.56 40.78
Mark-up accrued 157268 131580 0.40 0.45
Taxation 772454 1.95
Total Current liabilities 23307811 19612115 58.76 67.14
Non-Current Assets
Property, plant and equipment 7,460,549 8,012,317 5.87 10.72
Intangibles 105,502 126,212 0.08 0.17
Long term investments 2,701,097 2,990,591 2.13 4.00
Long term loans, advances and 477,745 627,972 0.38 0.84
receivables
Long term deposits and Prepayments 79,098 65,913 0.06 0.09
Deferred Taxes 407,337 401,037 0.32 0.54
Total Non-Current Assets 11,231,328 12,224,042 8.84 16.36
Current Assets
Stores, spare parts and loose tools 115,814 127,891 0.09 0.17
Stock-in-trade 62,360,067 29,562,055 49.06 39.55
Trade debts 33,904,728 13,599,966 26.67 18.20
Loans and advances 396,220 365,974 0.31 0.49
Deposits and short term prepayments 401,433 1,583,913 0.32 2.12
Other receivables 15,681,790 15,751,198 12.34 21.08
Cash and bank balances 3,018,640 1,522,276 2.37 2.04
Total Current Assets 115,878,692 62,513,273 91.16 83.64
EQUITY
Share Capital 1,715,190 1,715,190 1.35 2.29
Reserves 29,249,864 19,224,027 23.01 25.72
Total Equity 30,965,054 20,939,217 24.36 28.02
Liabilities
Non-Current Liabilities
Long term deposits 834,598 768,308 0.66 1.03
Retirement and other service 1,574,148 1,644,063 1.24 2.20
benefits
Total Non-Current Liabilities 2,408,746 2,412,371 1.90 3.23
Current Liabilities
Trade and other payables 81,067,565 41,431,075 63.78 55.44
Provisions 726,116 688,512 0.57 0.92
Accrued interest / mark-up 217,928 131,961 0.17 0.18
Short term borrowings 10,997,908 9,064,781 8.65 12.13
Taxes payable 726,703 69,398 0.57 0.09
Total Current Liabilities 93,736,220 51,385,727 73.74 68.76
Operating costs
Transportation costs 337,886 369,328 0.07 0.11
Distribution and marketing expenses 3,264,599 2,745,289 0.66 0.79
Administrative expenses 1,160,741 1,002,712 0.23 0.29
Depreciation 1,119,137 1,098,157 0.23 0.31
Amortization 47,689 41,908 0.01 0.01
Other operating expenses 3,352,969 755,420 0.68 0.22
Total Operating Cost 9,283,021 6,012,814 1.87 1.72
Non-current assets
Fixed assets 6826848 6579993 103.75 100
Long-term investments 2134783 2015535 105.92 100
Long-term loans and advances 146381 182579 80.17 100
Long-term deposits and prepayments 201718 110994 181.74 100
Long-term debtors 134920 328727 41.04 100
Deferred taxation - net - 280967 100
Total Non-current assets 9444650 9498795 99.43 100
Current assets
Stores and spares 13328 30286 44.01 100
Stock-in-trade 18095523 8244054 219.50 100
Trade debts 4904940 4251325 115.37 100
Loans and advances 47029 42720 110.09 100
Trade deposits and short-term 207864 140239 148.22 100
prepayments
Other receivables 6079111 5970763 101.81 100
Taxation 219715 100
Cash and bank balances 872414 814530 107.11 100
Total Current assets 30220209 19713632 153.30 100
Equity
Share capital 547904 547904 100.00 100
Reserves 2233026 2233026 100.00 100
Unappropriated profit 10830708 6679841 162.14 100
Total Equity 13611638 9460771 143.87 100
LIABILITIES
Non-current liabilities
Deferred taxation - net 51574 inf 100
Liabilities against assets subject to finance lease 2216 547 405.12 100
Long-term loan 2500000 inf 100
Asset retirement obligation 191620 138494 138.36 100
Total Non-current liabilities 2745410 139041 1974.53 100
Current liabilities
Current maturity of liabilities against assets subject to finance 56742 32203 176.20 100
lease
Short-term running finances utilized under mark-up 4338339 725836 597.70 100
arrangements
Short-term loans 1500000 6810000 22.03 100
Trade and other payables 16483008 11912496 138.37 100
Mark-up accrued 157268 131580 119.52 100
Taxation 772454 inf 100
Total Current liabilities 23307811 19612115 118.84 100
Non-Current Assets
Property, plant and equipment 7,460,549 8,012,317 93.11 100
Intangibles 105,502 126,212 83.59 100
Long term investments 2,701,097 2,990,591 90.32 100
Long term loans, advances and 477,745 627,972 76.08 100
receivables
Long term deposits and Prepayments 79,098 65,913 120.00 100
Deferred Taxes 407,337 401,037 101.57 100
Total Non-Current Assets 11,231,328 12,224,042 91.88 100
Current Assets
Stores, spare parts and loose tools 115,814 127,891 90.56 100
Stock-in-trade 62,360,067 29,562,055 210.95 100
Trade debts 33,904,728 13,599,966 249.30 100
Loans and advances 396,220 365,974 108.26 100
Deposits and short term prepayments 401,433 1,583,913 25.34 100
Other receivables 15,681,790 15,751,198 99.56 100
Cash and bank balances 3,018,640 1,522,276 198.30 100
Total Current Assets 115,878,692 62,513,273 185.37 100
EQUITY
Share Capital 1,715,190 1,715,190 100.00 100
Reserves 29,249,864 19,224,027 152.15 100
Total Equity 30,965,054 20,939,217 147.88 100
Liabilities
Non-Current Liabilities
Long term deposits 834,598 768,308 108.63 100
Retirement and other service 1,574,148 1,644,063 95.75 100
benefits
Total Non-Current Liabilities 2,408,746 2,412,371 99.85 100
Current Liabilities
Trade and other payables 81,067,565 41,431,075 195.67 100
Provisions 726,116 688,512 105.46 100
Accrued interest / mark-up 217,928 131,961 165.15 100
Short term borrowings 10,997,908 9,064,781 121.33 100
Taxes payable 726,703 69,398 1047.15 100
Total Current Liabilities 93,736,220 51,385,727 182.42 100
Operating costs
Transportation costs 337,886 369,328 91.49 100
Distribution and marketing expenses 3,264,599 2,745,289 118.92 100
Administrative expenses 1,160,741 1,002,712 115.76 100
Depreciation 1,119,137 1,098,157 101.91 100
Amortization 47,689 41,908 113.79 100
Other operating expenses 3,352,969 755,420 443.85 100
Total Operating Cost 9,283,021 6,012,814 154.39 100
Note:-
Company A:- Our Company SHELL
Company B:- Competitors Company PSO
Compared to 2007, Oil Marketing Companies enjoyed massive increase in earnings due to FIFO
inventory system but this affect could be reversed in the future.
Receivables from GOP and IPP are contributed to cash flow constraints which have led to
financing. Although this effect is not very obvious due to higher earnings but this financing cost
could be significant in times of normal oil prices.
Share prices of both companies remained at standstill. This trend of investors suggests that they
expect that these higher earnings and dividend announcements as temporary and they don’t want
to lose their money in the future.
Specifically to Shell as an MNC, the reduction in margin from the government and the higher
working capital requirements might affect the future performance of the company.
To tackle with the fluctuation in the oil prices, the OMC has to invest in R&D for alternative
energy resources as these fossil fuel resources are finite and limited and could led these firms to
failure.
As the operations of the two companies are almost similar except for the market share, the
operational efficiencies would led a company cut its costs and be the winner in the game.
Ever increasing demand for the POL products due to the higher number of vehicles in the
country provides an opportunity as well as a challenge to the companies that how they better
manage the optimum fixed asset requirements and convert their capital into increasing revenues.
Overall the Shell Pakistan has better managed the effect of increasing oil prices as an opportunity
to the company. Its profitability ratios as well as efficiency ones has improved more as compared
to the PSO’s.