Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
By Jud Evans
The simple self-referential use of the pronoun *I* is quite sufficient to instantiated
the ontologically confused Frenchman as a human existent. We do not need the
formulaic self-referential confirmative subsumptions that Descartes considered
necessary for the recognition and incorporation of one's humanness under a
more general category of human. It is not the utterance of abstract nouns, verbal
frequentatives (like: I think) or the reificative lexical shells and their contents
which confirm our existence as homo-sapiens. We are aware that we exist as
human beings at a much deeper non-lexical neurological level without the need to
articulate the obvious. We require no verbal, algorithmic mantra like: I think
therefore I am nor the mouthing of the usefully encoded first-person personal
pronouns: 'I' and 'me' to corroborate our membership of the human race.
*the self instantiating noun X presently exists in the modality of blah, blah, blah.*
NOMINAL INSTANTIATION
The utterance or sensorial awareness of ANY noun is automatically sufficient
enough to neurologically instantiate it as a representative instance of such an
entity.
Experientially most people thinking of the word "President Obama" will cognise
of a male person, known or unknown - living or dead.
So much for the collective confusion that we have inherited from obsessively
creationist historical commentators like Aquinas and his black habited
cohabitors. So much too for modern transcendentalists, who, imprinted since
birth with a debilitating notions of an ontological duality, continue to insist on
attributing unworldly complexity to real objects. Contrary to our mutual
brainwashing as children, copulae are not grammatical elements designed
specifically to act as meaningless catenulate links syntactically connecting
elements of a sentence.
The so-called * is of existence* lacks any factual basis and not one shred of
historical validity for the instantiaton of ALL nouns is neurologically
spontaneous. Ontological opinion regarding their actual entiative status or
pseudo transcendental (entitive) presence in the world is provided by the
addressor and the addressee respectively.
SENTENTIAL ADDRESSES
When we speak of a copula we really mean a numero-temporal variable that
points to the existential modalic information contained at a predicative sentential
address. When we talk about a copula "referring backwards" to the self-
instantiating head subject we mean whatever instantiated subject is to be
descriptively reconciled with its predicate.