Sime Darby Properties Realty Sdn. BHD.: Declaration

SIME DARBY PROPERTIES REALTY SDN. BHD.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF 71 UNITS

DOUBLE STOREY LINK HOUSE (26’ X 75’) AT PHASE 1B, ON
LOT PT. 11406 HSB 135440, NILAI IMPIAN, MUKIM
SENTUL,DAERAH SEREMBAN, NEGERI SEMBILAN DARUL
KHUSUS, FOR MESSRS SIME DARBY PROPERTIES REALTY
SDN. BHD.
CONTRACT NO: NI/P-NI1B/DBL/10/016
DECLARATION
This Tender Report is prepared by the undersigned for the above project and all
reviews made are based on the Tender Documents received only.
MITG GROUP SDN. BHD.
MOHD ADNAN SUHOT
1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 TITLE OF PROJECT
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF 71 UNITS

DOUBLE STOREY LINK HOUSE (26’ X 75’) AT PHASE 1B, ON LOT
PT. 11406 HSB 135440, NILAI IMPIAN, MUKIM SENTUL,DAERAH
SEREMBAN, NEGERI SEMBILAN DARUL KHUSUS, FOR MESSRS
SIME DARBY PROPERTIES REALTY SDN. BHD.
CONTRACT NO: NI/P-NI1B/DBL/10/016
1.2 BRIEF INFORMATION OF TENDER
a) Consultant Pre-Tender Estimate : RM 19,980,108.82
b) Date of Closing of Tender : 24th March 2011
b) Fixed Completion Period of Contract : 52 weeks
c) Tender Validity Period : 120 days
d) Expiry Date of Tender Validity Period : 22nd July 2011
e) Type of Tender : Tender by Invitation/

Selective Tendering
from Employer’s
approved list
f) Type of Contract : Bill of Quantities Form

Part of the Contract
g) Tender bond : RM 10,000.00
h) Performance Bond : 5% of Contract Sum
i) L.A.D (Mock-up Unit) : RM 500.00/Unit/Day

(Whole Works) : RM 10,300.00/Day
2
1.3 CONSULTANTS FOR THE PROJECT:
a) Architect : Visage Architect Sdn. Bhd.
b) Civil Engineer : Ranhill Bersekutu Sdn. Bhd.
c) Structural Engineer : JPI Sdn. Bhd
d) Mechanical and Electrical Engineer : PE Associates Sdn. Bhd
e) Quantity Surveyor : MITG Group Sdn. Bhd.
2.0 SCOPE OF WORKS
The Works let on this contract are as follows:
a) Preliminaries and General Conditions
b) Anti-termite Chemical Treatment
c) Building Works
d) Infrastructure Works (Provisional Quantities)
e) Mock-up Units
f) Mechanical & Electrical Works
3.0 THE TENDER
The tender is based on Bills of Quantities which form part of the contract in
accordance with the “Agreement and Conditions of PAM Contract 2006 –
Private Edition with Quantities”. No adjustment in the tendered sum will be
allowed. However, if there are changes in the scope of works ordered by the
Employer, these will be treated as variations and adjustments to the tendered
sum. The tendered rates will be used as a basis for valuation of such
variations.
3
4.0 CALLING OF TENDER
The tender was based on selective tendering. Fifteen (15) pre-qualified

tenderers (selection done by the Employer) were invited by the Employer to
submit tenders for this project.
The documents were made available to tenderers commencing 24 th February

2011. Ten (10) tenderers responded to the tender invitation.
All tenderers were required to submit their tenders on the stipulated time viz.,
not later than 12 noon on 24th March 2011 at the office of:
Contract Management Department

Sime Darby Property Berhad
Operation Office,
20, Jalan Astaka U8/82,
Seksyen U8, Bukit Jelutong,
40150 Shah Alam,
Selangor Darul Ehsan.
5.0 TENDERS RECEIVED
The tenders were opened at the office of Messrs. Sime Darby Property Berhad
(Contract Management Department). All the Ten (10) tenderers that
responded to the invitation, submitted their tenders on or before the stipulated
date and time.
All the tender documents were then reverted to the office of the Consulting
Quantity Surveyor on 24th March 2011. The detailed analysis and tender
evaluation focused on five (5) lowest tenders only as other five (5) tenderer’s
offer were higher. It is unlikely that the offer will be neither considered for
acceptance nor beneficial to the Employer. The tabulation of the tenders
received arranged in ascending order is depicted in Table 1 of Page 5. (Refer
also Schedule of Tender Opening)
There was one (1) no. Addendum issued and all the ten tenderers have
included it in their tender.
4
5
Table 1 - Tenders Received in Ascending Order
Fixed Completion Open Completion Period

Period
Tender Tender
Tender Tender
Sum (RM) Sum (RM)
Sum (RM) Sum (RM)
with 60 Completio with 60 Completio
24 Month 24 Month
Code Tenderer Position Month n Period Month n Period Remarks
Defect Defect
Defect (Weeks) Defect (Weeks)
Liability Liability
Liability Liability
Period Period
Period Period
PA BUILDERS
6/10 1 21,788,000.00 25,668,000.00 23,993,311.21 48 27,873,311.21 48
SDN BHD
AL AMBIA SDN
2/10 2 22,210,895.91 - - -
BHD - -
7/10 GLOBAL GLOBE 3 22,602,103.95 - - -

- -
SDN BHD
8/10 SRI MANSANG 4 23,820,000.00 25,820,000.00 - -

- -
SDN BHD
4/10 IDAMAN IKHLAS 5 23,863,048.94 24,113,048.94 - -

- -
SDN BHD
6
Fixed Completion Open Completion Period
Period
Tender Tender Tender Remarks

Tender
Code Tenderer Position Sum (RM) Sum (RM) Sum (RM)
Sum (RM)
24 Month with 60 Completio with 60 Completio
24 Month
Defect Month n Period Month n Period
Defect
Liability Defect (Weeks) Defect (Weeks)
Liability
Period Liability Liability
Period
Period Period
JALLCON SDN
10/10 6 23,980,000.00 25,880.000.00
BHD
3/10 MAKASSAR SDN 7 25,500,000.00 25,800,000.00 25,500,000.00 52 25,800,000.00 52

BHD
5/10 TIMUR KAYA 8 26,419,690.35 27,619,690.35 - - - -

SDN BHD
1/10 AIMA 9 27,574,685.30 28,677,672.70

CONSTRUCTIO 29,523,911.35 65 30,704,867.80 65
N SDN. BHD
9/10 BUMIMETRO 10 29,190,073.80 -

CONSTRUCTIO - - - -
N SDN BHD
7
Arithmetical checks were carried out on all tenders. Errors were found in all the
tenders. The errors were due to mistakes in multiplying, addition and transfer. The
errors subsequently change the tenderer’s position. The tenders, the corrected tender
sum and their revised position are depicted below.
Table 3 - Corrected Tender Sum due to Arithmetical Error:
Original Tender Corrected Arithmetical Check

Original Remarks
Code Tenderer Sum Tender Sum Revised
Position
( RM ) ( RM ) Error (RM) % Position
PA BUILDERS 1 21,786,942.60 -1,057.40 -0.0049 1

6/10 21,788,000.00
SDN BHD
AL AMBIA SDN 2 23,027,144.88 +816,248.97 +3.6750 2

2/10 22,210,895.91 Wrong M&E
BHD
transfer
3 23,375,071.95 +772,968.00 +3.4199 4 Wrong M&E

7/10 GLOBAL GLOBE 22,602,103.95
transfer
SDN BHD
8/10 SRI MANSANG 23,820,000.00 4 23,821,155.80 +1,155.80 +0.0049 5

SDN BHD
4/10 IDAMAN IKHLAS 23,863,048.94 5 23,862,985.04 -63.90 -0.0003 6

SDN BHD
JALLCON SDN 6 23,159,983.00 -820,017.00 -3.4196 3 Wrong M&E

10/10 23,980,000.00
BHD transfer
3/10 MAKASSAR SDN 25,500,000.00 7 25,508,996.40 +8,996.40 +0.0353 7

BHD
5/10 TIMUR KAYA 26,419,690.35 8 26,442,173.35 +22,483.00 +0.0851 8

SDN BHD
8
Original Tender Corrected Arithmetical Check
Original Remarks
Code Tenderer Sum Tender Sum Revised
Position
( RM ) ( RM ) Position
Error (RM) %
AIMA
1/10 CONSTRUCTION 27,574,685.30 9 27,577,301.02 +2,615.72 +0.0095 9
SDN. BHD
BUMIMETRO Arithmetical
9/10 CONSTRUCTION 29,190,073.80 10 30,314,446.63 +1,124,372.83 +3.8519 10 Error –
SDN BHD General
Summary
The Tendered Sum shall be the basis of acceptance of tender and not the Corrected
Total. Any error found, shall be rationalized prior to signing of Contract.
9
6.0 ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF TENDERS
The tenders were evaluated based on the financial or commercial proposal

only. Since the tender was based on selective tendering, tenderers selected
were deemed to be capable in carrying out the proposed work to warrant
invitation. Hence, we did not analyse the tenderer’s capabilities in terms of
experience and resources.
The criteria of the evaluation in descending order of importance are as follows:
6.1 Tender documents duly filled in and a formal offer made (Sufficiency of
Tenders submitted).
6.2 Competitiveness and reasonableness of tender.
6.3 Pricing all sections of the tender documents and Bills of Quantities.
All tender documents are checked to ensure that tenderers had made valid
and proper offers. A full checklist/analysis is given in the following appendices:
Appendix A - Breakdown of Tender by Section

Appendix B - Breakdown of Building Works per Unit
Appendix C (i) - Elemental Cost Breakdown for Building Works
(Type A)
Appendix C (ii) - Elemental Cost Breakdown for Building Works
(Type B)
Appendix D - Comparison of Major Rates
Our evaluation was based on comparative analysis between our Pre-Tender

estimate and the Tenderer’s submission.
7.0 COMMENTS ON THE SUBMISSION

10
7.1 Tenderer 6/10 – PA BUILDERS SDN. BHD.
Tender Sum Corrected Error Original Revised

(RM) Tender Sum Position Position
(RM)
21,788,000.00 21,786,942.60 -1,057.40 1 1

(-0.0049%)
The tenderer made a valid and proper offer and complied with all major tender
requirements. The tenderer submitted a complete tender.
The Tenderer submitted the lowest offer and the arithmetical error are found
but the error does not affect the contractor’s ranking. The tenderer’s overall
offer is within the acceptable margin of +/- 10%, i.e. 9.05% higher than the
QS estimate.
11
Tenderer Difference Percentage
Description Qs Estimate
(RM) with estimate Difference %
Preliminaries 1,109,305.11 920,000.00 +189,305.11 +20.57
Building
Works
Type A 6,954,576.65 5,862,369.52 +1,092,207.13 +18.63
Type B 7,168,724.24 6,050,856.88 +1,117,867.36 +18.47
External
Works Within 131,267.00 135,996.40 -4,699.40 -3.46
Lot Boundary
Anti Termite 49,230.00 61,076.00 -11,846.00 -19.40

Treatment
Mock Up Unit 20,000.00 10,000.00 +10,000.00 +100.00
Mechanical &
Electrical 1,000,469.00 2,272,000.00 -1,271,531.00 -55.97
Works
External 3,808,062.00 2,964,652.00 +843,410.00 +28.45

Infrastructure
Lighting and 340,820.00 360,650.02 -19,830.02 -5.50

Telephone
Infrastructure
Prime Cost
Sum & 818,000.00 800,000.00 +18,000.00 +2.25
Provisional
Sum
Tender Sum 21,788,000.00 19,980,106.82 +1,807,893.18 +9.05
12
7.0 COMMENTS ON THE SUBMISSION (CONT’D)
7.1 Tenderer 6/10 – PA BUILDERS SDN. BHD. (CONT’D)
The pricing for Preliminaries is higher i.e. 20.57% higher than the QS
estimate. The preliminaries price at RM 1,109,305.11 or 5.60% of the tender
sum is considered acceptable.
The overall cost for building works is higher, i.e. Type A (+18.63%) and Type
B (+18.47%) higher than the QS estimate.
The cost per m2 GFA for typical unit (intermediate unit) is RM80.67 is higher
than the QS estimate which is RM67.95.
The following rates are considered high that caused the major difference
between the tenderer and the QS estimate :-
Rate (RM) Amount (RM) Total Amount (RM) Difference

Item Qty Unit with QS (RM)
QS Tenderer QS Tenderer QS Tenderer
Half
80 75.00/m² 265.00/m² 6,000.00 21,200.00 71 426,000.00 1,505,200.00 1,079,200.00
Slab
Acotec
190 55.00/m² 74.20/m² 10,450.00 14,098.00 71 741,950.00 1,000,958.00 259,008.00
Wall
TOTAL 1,167,950.00 2,506,158.00 1,338,208.00
The rates/pricing for Infrastructure Works is higher, i.e. 28.45% higher than
the QS estimate.
The rates/pricing for External Telephone Infra and Street Lighting Service
- 5.50% lower than the Engineer estimate.
The pricing for Mechanical and Electrical works is higher, i.e -55.97% lower
than the Engineer estimate.
Comparison in the prices offered are as depicted in Appendix A-D.
13
7.2 Tenderer 2/10 – AL AMBIA SDN. BHD.
Corrected
Tender Sum Original Revised
Tender Sum Error
(RM) Position Position
(RM)
22,210,895.91 23,027,144.88 +816,248.97 2 2

(+3.6750%)
requirements.
The tenderer submitted the second lowest offer with the arithmetical error of
+RM816, 248.97, mainly due to wrong M&E transfer. Their corrected tender
amount is actually higher at RM 23,027,144.88 but the error does not change
the tenderer’s ranking. The tenderer’s overall offer i.e. 11.17% higher than
the QS estimate.
14
Preliminaries 1,013,644.00 920,000.00 +93,644.00 +10.18
Building
Works
Type A 6,748,207.50 5,862,369.52 +885,837.98 +15.11
Type B 6,962,028.08 6,050,856.88 +911,171.20 +15.06
External
Works Within 153,909.30 135,996.40 +17,912.90 +13.17
Lot Boundary
Anti Termite 64,981.40 61,076.00 +3,905.40 +6.39

Treatment
Mock Up Unit 67,288.00 10,000.00 +57,288.00 +572.88
Mechanical &
Electrical 626,362.00 2,272,000.00 -1,645,638.00 -72.43
Works
External 4,901,376.83 2,964,652.00 +1,936,724.83 +65.33

Infrastructure
Lighting and
Telephone 432,475.80 360,650.02 +71,825.78 +19.92
Infrastructure
Prime Cost
Sum &
Provisional 824,000.00 800,000.00 +24,000.00 +3.00
Sum
Tender Sum 22,210,895.91 19,980,106.82 +2,230,789.09 +11.17
15
7.2 Tenderer 2/10 – AL AMBIA SDN. BHD. (CONT’D)
The pricing for Preliminaries is generally lower i.e. 10.18% higher than the
QS estimate. The preliminaries price at RM 1,013,644.00 or 4.98% of the
tender sum is considered acceptable.
The total cost for building works is higher, i.e. Type A (+15.11%) and Type B
(+15.06%) higher than the QS estimate.
Difference
Rate (RM) Amount (RM) Total Amount (RM)
Item Qty Unit with QS
(RM)
Fwk to
sides of 188 8.00/m 17.00/m 1,504.00 3,196.00 71 106,784.00 226,916.00 120,132.00
slab
Half slab 80 75.00/m² 88.80/m² 6,000.00 7,105.00 71 426,000.00 504,384.00 78,384.00
100mm
16 5.00/m 16.90/m 80.00 270.40 71 5,680.00 19,198.40 12,518.40
skirting
175mm
23 9.00/m 28.80/m 32.80 276.00 71 14,697.00 47,030.40 32,333.40
riser
Nosing 23 5.00/m 26.10/m 115.00 600.30 71 8,165.00 42,621.30 34,456.30
Half bwl 102 28.00/m² 41.20/m² 2,856.00 4,202.20 71 202,776.00 298,370.40 95,594.40
Acotec wall 190 55.00/m² 70.10/m² 10,450.00 13,319.00 71 741,950.00 945,649.00 203,699.00
Plaster 98 10.00/m² 18.70/m² 980.00 1,832.60 71 69,580.00 130,114.60 60,534.60
`TOTAL C/F 1,595,228.00 2,267,846.50 672,618.50
16
7.2 Tenderer 2/10 – AL AMBIA SDN. BHD. (CONT’D)

Total B/F 1,595,228.00 2,267,846.50 672,618.50
400mm x
400mm 78 47.00/m² 80.10/m² 3,666.00 6,247.80 71 260,286.00 443,593.80 183,307.80
tiles
Pegola 4 120.00/no 1,062.60/no 480.00 4,250.40 71 34,080.00 301,778.40 267,698.40
Refuse bin 1 800.00/no 1,744.80/no 800.00 1,744.80 71 56,800.00 123,880.80 67,080.80
TNB 1 800.00/no 1,058.20/no 800.00 1,058.20 71 56,800.00 75,132.20 18,332.20

Surface
water
drain
900mm
83 350.00/m 1,210.00/m 29,050.00 100,430.00 - - - 71,380.00
wide
750mm
23 290.00/m 1.155.00/m 6,670.00 26,565.00 - - - 19,895.00
wide
600mm
195 230.00/m 1,078.00/m 44,620.00 209,132.00 - - - 164,512.00
wide
450mm
53 175.00/m 1,023.00/m 9,275.00 54,219.00 - - - 44,944.00
wide
Ditto, avg
222 140.00/m 880.00/m 31,080.00 195,360.00 - - - 164,280.00
dpth
Precast
1,344 120.00/m 517.00/m 161,280.00 694,848.00 - - - 533,568.00
block drain
TOTAL 2,285,169.00 4,492,785.70 2,207,616.70
The cost per m2 GFA for typical unit (intermediate unit) is RM78.03 is higher
than the QS estimate which is RM67.95.
The rates/pricing for Infrastructure Works are higher, i.e. 65.33% higher than
the QS estimate.
19.92% higher than the Engineer estimate.
The pricing for Mechanical and Electrical works is very high, i.e -72.43% lower
than the Engineer Estimate some arithmetical error during transfer to general
summary.
Comparison in the prices offered are as depicted in Appendix A-D.
17
7.3 Tenderer 7/10 – GLOBAL GLOBE SDN. BHD.
Corrected
Tender Sum Error
(RM)
22,602,103.95 23,375,071.95 +772,968.00 3 4

(+3.4199%)
requirements.
The tenderer’s overall offer is i.e. 13.12% higher than the QS estimate which
is 3rd lowest tenderer. There is an error of +RM772,968.00 or +3.4199%
mainly due to wrong M&E transfer. The error when corrected changed the
contractor’s ranking from 3rd to 4th.
18
7.3 Tenderer 7/10 – GLOBAL GLOBE SDN. BHD. (CONT’D)

Preliminaries 630,000.00 920,000.00 -290,000.00 -31.52
Building
Works
Type A 7,190,373.05 5,862,369.52 +1,328,003.53 +22.65
Type B 7,426,721.40 6,050,856.88 +1,375,864.52 +22.74
External
Works Within 270,990.50 135,996.40 +134,994.10 +99.26
Lot Boundary
Anti Termite 26,615.00 61,076.00 -34,461.00 -56.42

Treatment
Mock Up Unit 223,000.00 10,000.00 +213,000.00 +2,130.00
Mechanical &
Electrical 560,190.00 2,272,000.00 -1,711,810.00 -75.34
Works
External 4,557,382.00 2,964,652.00 +1,592,730.00 +53.72

Infrastructure
Lighting and
Telephone 393,061.00 360,650.02 +32,410.98 +8.99
Infrastructure
Prime Cost
Sum &
Provisional 806,000.00 800,000.00 +6,000.00 +0.75
Sum
Tender Sum 22,602,103.95 19,980,106.82 +2,621,997.13 +13.12

19
The pricing for Preliminaries is generally lower i.e. -31.52% lower than the QS
estimate. The preliminaries price at RM 630,000.00 or 2.98% of the tender
sum is considered low.
The total building works is i.e. Type A (22.65%) and Type B (22.74%) higher
than the QS estimate

100mm
16 5.00/m 35.00/m 80.00 560.00 71 5,680.00 39,760.00 34,080.00
skirting
175mm
23 9.00/m² 35.00/m² 207.00 805.00 71 14,697.00 57,155.00 78,384.00
riser
225mm
23 5.00/m 35.00/m 276.00 805.00 71 5,680.00 19,198.40 12,518.40
tread
Nosing 23 5.00/m 35.00/m 115.00 805.00 71 8,165.00 42,621.30 34,456.30
Half bwl 102 28.00/m² 36.00/m² 2,856.00 3,672.00 71 202,776.00 298,370.40 95,594.40
Acotec wall 190 55.00/m² 70.10/m² 10,450.00 13,319.00 71 741,950.00 945,649.00 203,699.00
Plaster 98 10.00/m² 16.00/m² 980.00 1,568.00 71 69,580.00 130,114.60 60,534.60

400mm x
78 47.00/m² 86.00/m² 3,666.00 6,708.00 71 260,286.00 476,268.00 215,982.00
400mm tile
Skirting 73 5.00/m 40.00/m 365.00 2,920.00 71 25,915.00 207,320.00 181,405.00
UAC 47 32.00/m² 70.00/m² 1,504.00 3.290.00 71 106,784.00 233,590.00 126,806.00

Plaster
121 45.00/m² 70.00/m² 5,445.00 8,470.00 71 386,595.00 601,370.00 214,775.00
board
TOTAL C/F 1,842,024.00 2,911,213.00 1,068,189.00
20

Total B/F 1,842,024.00 2,911,213.00 1,068,189.00
Broom
34 5.00/m² 45.00/m² 170.00 1,540.00 71 12.070.00 108,630.00 96,560.00
finish
Pebble
8 40.00/m² 150.00/m² 320.00 1,200.00 71 22,720.00 85,200.00 62,480.00
wash
Gate 1 1,000.00/no 2,000.00/no 1,000.00 2,000.00 71 71,000.00 142,000.00 71,000.00
Refuse bin 1 800.00/no 1,800.00/no 800.00 1800.00 71 56,800.00 127,800.00 71,000.00
TNB 1 800.00/no 1,200.00/no 800.00 1,200.00 71 56,800.00 85,200.00 28,400.00
Pegola 4 120.00/no 500.00/no 480.00 2,000.00 71 34,080.00 142,000.00 107,920.00

900mm
83 350.00/m 1,500.00/m 29,050.00 124,500.00 - - - 95,450.00
wide drain
750mm
23 290.00/m 900.00/m 6,670.00 20,700.00 - - - 14,030.00
wide ditto
600mm
195 230.00/m 750.00/m 44,620.00 145,500.00 - - - 100,880.00
wide ditto
450mm
53 175.00/m 450.00/m 9,275.00 23,850.00 - - - 14,575.00
wide ditto
Ditto, avg
dpth exc 222 140.00/m 350.00/m 31,080.00 77,700.00 - - - 46,620.00
1.5
Precast
1,344 120.00/m 350.00/m 161,280.00 470,400.00 - - - 309,120.00
block drain
Crusher run 4,306 13.50/m² 23.00/m² 58,131.00 99,038.00 - - - 40,907.00
Conc.
4,306 15.20/m² 24.00/m² 65,451.20 103,344.00 - - - 37,892.80
Wearing
Kerb 3.107 30.00/m 78.00/no 93,210.00 242,346.00 - - - 149,136.00
TOTAL 2,594,261.20 4,909,421.00 2,315,159.80
21
The cost per m2 GFA GFA for typical unit (intermediate unit) is RM83.73 is
higher than the QS estimate which is RM67.95.
the QS estimate.
The pricing for Mechanical and Electrical works is lower, i.e -75.34% lower
than Engineer Estimate and some arithmetical error during transfer to general
summary.
7.3 Tenderer 8/10 – SRI MANSANG SDN. BHD.
Corrected
Tender Sum Error
(RM)
23,820,000.00 23,821,155.80 +1,155.80 4 5

(+0.0049)
requirements.
The tenderer’s overall offer is i.e. 19.22% higher than the QS estimate.
There is an error of +RM1,155.80 or +0.0049% mainly due to amount transfer
to summary. The error when corrected changed the contractor’s ranking from
4th to 5th.
22
Preliminaries 2,320,502.10 920,000.00 +1,400,502.10 +152.23
Building
Works
Type A 6,904,454.21 5,862,369.52 +1,042,084.69 +17.78
Type B 7,121,870.60 6,050,856.88 +1,071,013.72 +17.70
External
Works Within 185,862.90 135,996.40 +49,866.50 +36.67
Lot Boundary
Anti Termite 67,076.00 61,076.00 +6,000.00 +9.82

Treatment
Mock Up Unit 145,110.00 10,000.00 +135,110.00 +1,351.00
Mechanical &
Electrical 1,205,221.00 2,272,000.00 -1,066,779.00 -46.95
Works
External 4,241,352.00 2,964,652.00 +1,276,700.00 +43..06

Infrastructure
Lighting and 442,854.00 360,650.02 +82,203.98 +22.79

Telephone
Infrastructure
Prime Cost
Sum & 824,000.00 800,000.00 +24,000.00 +3.00
Provisional
Sum
Tender Sum 23,820,000.00 19,980,106.82 +3,839,891.18 +19.22
23
7.3 Tenderer 8/10 – SRI MANSANG SDN. BHD. (CONT’D)
The pricing for Preliminaries is generally higher i.e. 152.23% higher than the
tender sum is considered high.

Half slab 80 75.00/m² 122.00/m 6,000.00 9,150.00 71 426,000.00 649,650.00 223,650.00
Half bwl 102 28.00/m² 43.00/m² 2,856.00 4,386.00 71 202,776.00 311,406.00 108,630.00
Plaster 98 10.00/m² 16.92/m² 980.00 1,658.16 71 69,580.00 117,729.36 48,149.36

Broom
34 5.00/m² 28.00/m² 170.00 952.00 71 12,070.00 67,592.00 55,552.00
finish
Pebble
8 40.00/m² 98.00/m² 320.00 784.00 71 22,720.00 55,664.00 32,944.00
wash
Gate 1 1,000.00/no 3,400.00/no 1,000.00 3,400.00 71 71,000.00 241,400.00 170,400.00
Refuse bin 1 800.00/no 2,780.00/no 800.00 2,780.00 71 56,800.00 197,380.00 140,580.00
TNB 1 800.00/no 1,800.00/no 800.00 1,800.00 71 56,800.00 127,800.00 71,000.00
Pegola 4 120.00/no 990.00/no 480.00 3.960.00 71 34,080.00 281,160.00 247,080.00
TOTAL C/F 951,826.00 2,049,781.36 1,097,955.36

24
7.3 Tenderer 8/10 – SRI MANSANG SDN. BHD. (CONT’D)

Total B/F 951,826.00 2,049,781.36 1,097,955.36
900mm
83 350.00/m 695.00/m 29,050.00 57,685.00 - - - 28,635.00
wide drain
750mm
23 290.00/m 650.00/m 6,670.00 14,950.00 - - - 8,280.00
wide ditto
600mm
195 230.00/m 570.00/m 44,620.00 110,580.00 - - - 65,960.00
wide ditto
450mm
53 175.00/m 583.00/m 9,275.00 30,899.00 - - - 21,624.00
wide ditto
Ditto, exc
222 140.00/m 514.00/m 31,080.00 114,108.00 - - - 83,028.00
1.5m
Precast
1,344 120.00/m 448.00/m 161,280.00 602,112.00 - - - 440,832.00
block drain
DIsposal 11,961 5.00/m³ 20.00/m³ 58,131.00 239,220.00 - - - 179,415.00
TOTAL 1,293,606.00 3,2193,35.36 1,925,729.36
the QS estimate.
The pricing for Mechanical and Electrical works is lower, i.e -46.95% lower
than Engineer Estimate.

25
7.3 Tenderer 4/10 – IDAMAN IKHLAS SDN. BHD.
Corrected
Tender Sum Error
(RM)
23,863,048.94 23,862,985.04 -63.90 5 6

(-0.0003)
requirements.
The tenderer’s overall offer is i.e. 19.43% higher than the QS estimate.
26
Preliminaries 1,300,000.00 920,000.00 +380,000.00 +41.30
Building
Works
Type A 7,271,238.55 5,862,369.52 +1,408,869.03 +24.03
Type B 7,493,441.32 6,050,856.88 +1,442,584.44 +23.84
External
Works Within 173,514.46 135,996.40 +37,518.06 +27.59
Lot Boundary
Anti Termite 61,340.58 61,076.00 +264.58 +0.43

Treatment
Mock Up Unit 43,805.53 10,000.00 +33,805.53 +338.06
Mechanical &
Electrical 1,243,540.11 2,272,000.00 -1,028,459.89 -45.27
Works
External 4,629,804.79 2,964,652.00 +1,665,152.79 +56.17

Infrastructure
Lighting and 400,204.49 360,650.02 +39,554.47 +10.97

Telephone
Infrastructure
Prime Cost
Sum & 824,000.00 800,000.00 +18,000.00 +2.25
Provisional
Sum
Tender Sum 23,820,000.00 19,980,106.82 +3,882,940.12 +19.43
27
7.3 Tenderer 4/10 – IDAMAN IKHLAS SDN. BHD. (CONT’D)
The pricing for Preliminaries is generally higher i.e. 41.30% higher than the
tender sum is considered acceptable.

Half slab 80 75.00/m² 154.18/m 6,000.00 11,563.50 71 426,000.00 821,008.50 395,008.50
Roof 117 58.93/m² 98.55/m² 7,000.11 11,530.35 71 497,007.81 818,654.85 321,647.04
Half bwl 102 28.00/m² 40.73/m² 2,856.00 4,154.46 71 202,776.00 294,966.66 92,190.66
Plaster 98 10.00/m² 29.04/m² 980.00 2,845.92 71 69,580.00 202,060.32 132,480.32

Pebble
8 40.00/m² 101.48/m² 320.00 811.84 71 22,720.00 55,664.00 32,944.00
wash
Refuse bin 1 800.00/no 2,371.36/no 800.00 2,371.36 71 56,800.00 168,366.56 111,566.56
TNB 1 800.00/no 1,252.65/no 800.00 1,252.65 71 56,800.00 88,938.15 32,138.15
Pegola 4 120.00/no 618.37/no 480.00 2,473.48 71 34,080.00 175,617.08 141,537.08
TOTAL C/F 1,365,763.81 2,627,252.76 1,261,488.95

28

Total B/F 1,365,763.81 2,627,252.76 1,261,488.95
Precast
1,344 120.00/m 511.00/m 161,280.00 686,784.00 - - - 525,504.00
block drain
2100mm x
2100mm 1 2,600.00/no 3,741.40/no 2,600.00 3,741.40 - - - 1,141.40
bricksump
1950mm x
1950mm 6 2,300.00/no 3,482.20/no 13,800.00 20,893.20 - - - 7,093.20
ditto
1650mm x
1650mm 2 1,600.00/no 2,975.78/no 3,200.00 5,951.56 - - - 2,751.56
ditto
1500mm x
1500mm 3 1,100/no 1,880.29/no 3,300.00 5,640.87 - - - 2,340.87
ditto
Ditto exc
1.5m but n.e 29 1,300.00/no 2,734.86/no 37,700.00 79,310.94 - - - 41,610.94
3.0m
1200mm x
7 900.00/no 1,540.46/no 6,300.00 10,783.74 - - - 4,483.22
1200mm
750mm x
750mm 47 75.00/no 230.43/no 3,525,00 10,829.74 - - - 7,304.74
cover slab
600mm x
170 48.00/no 211.33/no 8.160.00 35,926.10 - - - 27,766.10
600mm ditto
450mm x
170 27.00/no 200.10/no 4,590.00 34,017.00 - - - 29,427.00
450mm ditto
TOTAL 1,610,218.81 3,521,130.79 1,910,911.98
29
the QS estimate.
The pricing for Mechanical and Electrical works is lower, i.e -4

-45.27%
5.27% lower
than Engineer Estimate.
8.0 OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

30
The following are our observation and recommendation:-
1) If time is and essence and the project need to be launched immediately,

we recommend the following:-
a) Tender interview to be held to inform the tenderers about their

rates.
b) We proposed tenderer PA Builders to be inform about the rates

for half slab and Acotec wall and they have to review their rates
since these items caused major difference from our estimate.
c) Tenderer Al-Ambia need to review the infrastructure works to our

acceptable range.
If both above tenderer’s price can be reduced to an acceptable range,

their overall pricing would definitely be within an acceptable price for
award.
2) If time is not critical we recommend to re-tender this phase to get wider

price range because from our observation, the contractor pricing for the
works were not based on market price which we believe due of the
following reasons:-
a) The contractors speculate that the price of basic material would

increase again in the next 5 or 6 months which will coincide with
work being done on site.
b) Speculative buying of major item such as concrete and

reinforcement bar. We strongly believe that the contractor has
made forward order at a premium price in anticipation of the price
going higher whereas in actual fact the price is lower at the
current point of time.
31

Sime Darby Properties Realty Sdn. BHD.: Declaration

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originalbeschreibung:

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Sime Darby Properties Realty Sdn. BHD.: Declaration

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

SIME DARBY PROPERTIES REALTY SDN. BHD.

PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF 71 UNITS

CONTRACT NO: NI/P-NI1B/DBL/10/016

MITG GROUP SDN. BHD.

MOHD ADNAN SUHOT

1.1 TITLE OF PROJECT

PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF 71 UNITS

CONTRACT NO: NI/P-NI1B/DBL/10/016

1.2 BRIEF INFORMATION OF TENDER

a) Consultant Pre-Tender Estimate : RM 19,980,108.82

b) Date of Closing of Tender : 24th March 2011

b) Fixed Completion Period of Contract : 52 weeks

c) Tender Validity Period : 120 days

d) Expiry Date of Tender Validity Period : 22nd July 2011

e) Type of Tender : Tender by Invitation/

f) Type of Contract : Bill of Quantities Form

g) Tender bond : RM 10,000.00

h) Performance Bond : 5% of Contract Sum

i) L.A.D (Mock-up Unit) : RM 500.00/Unit/Day

a) Architect : Visage Architect Sdn. Bhd.

b) Civil Engineer : Ranhill Bersekutu Sdn. Bhd.

c) Structural Engineer : JPI Sdn. Bhd

d) Mechanical and Electrical Engineer : PE Associates Sdn. Bhd

e) Quantity Surveyor : MITG Group Sdn. Bhd.

2.0 SCOPE OF WORKS

The Works let on this contract are as follows:

a) Preliminaries and General Conditions

b) Anti-termite Chemical Treatment

d) Infrastructure Works (Provisional Quantities)

f) Mechanical & Electrical Works

3.0 THE TENDER

The tender was based on selective tendering. Fifteen (15) pre-qualified

The documents were made available to tenderers commencing 24 th February

Contract Management Department

5.0 TENDERS RECEIVED

Fixed Completion Open Completion Period

7/10 GLOBAL GLOBE 3 22,602,103.95 - - -

8/10 SRI MANSANG 4 23,820,000.00 25,820,000.00 - -

4/10 IDAMAN IKHLAS 5 23,863,048.94 24,113,048.94 - -

Tender Tender Tender Remarks

3/10 MAKASSAR SDN 7 25,500,000.00 25,800,000.00 25,500,000.00 52 25,800,000.00 52

5/10 TIMUR KAYA 8 26,419,690.35 27,619,690.35 - - - -

1/10 AIMA 9 27,574,685.30 28,677,672.70

9/10 BUMIMETRO 10 29,190,073.80 -

Table 3 - Corrected Tender Sum due to Arithmetical Error:

Original Tender Corrected Arithmetical Check

PA BUILDERS 1 21,786,942.60 -1,057.40 -0.0049 1

AL AMBIA SDN 2 23,027,144.88 +816,248.97 +3.6750 2

3 23,375,071.95 +772,968.00 +3.4199 4 Wrong M&E

8/10 SRI MANSANG 23,820,000.00 4 23,821,155.80 +1,155.80 +0.0049 5

4/10 IDAMAN IKHLAS 23,863,048.94 5 23,862,985.04 -63.90 -0.0003 6

JALLCON SDN 6 23,159,983.00 -820,017.00 -3.4196 3 Wrong M&E

3/10 MAKASSAR SDN 25,500,000.00 7 25,508,996.40 +8,996.40 +0.0353 7

5/10 TIMUR KAYA 26,419,690.35 8 26,442,173.35 +22,483.00 +0.0851 8

The tenders were evaluated based on the financial or commercial proposal

The criteria of the evaluation in descending order of importance are as follows:

6.2 Competitiveness and reasonableness of tender.

Appendix A - Breakdown of Tender by Section

Our evaluation was based on comparative analysis between our Pre-Tender

7.0 COMMENTS ON THE SUBMISSION

Tender Sum Corrected Error Original Revised

21,788,000.00 21,786,942.60 -1,057.40 1 1