Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
science
review
Spring 2006 Issue 10
Plus: BSR turns 10 & Origins of Chocolate & A Star is Born & Congress 101 & Pennies from Hell
B ERKELEY S CIENCE R EVIEW SPRING 2006 1
BERKELEY DEAR READERS,
science It is my pleasure to introduce you to this, the 10th issue of the Berkeley Science Review. Beginning
review with our first issue published five years ago this spring, the BSR has time and again brought you
the best of Berkeley’s research in areas as diverse as astronomy, ethnobotany and immunology. For
me, this is the 4th issue I have taken part in–and it really does keep getting better and better!
Editor in Chief In this issue we take a look back at some of the BSR’s memorable stories and give you updates on
the latest progress (p. 6).
Jessica Porter
New this spring, Michelangelo D’Agostino takes a hard look at UC Berkeley’s role in the
Managing Editor controversy surrounding teaching evolution in public schools (p.31). Former BSR editors
Temina Madon and Heidi Ledford tell us about how scientists can talk to policy makers (p.43),
Wes Marner and what to expect from the world of intellectual property licensing (p.36) respectively. Jesse Dill
Art Director and Harish Agarwal report on a possible resolution to a long-standing debate over star formation
(p.12). Returning “Who Knew” columnist Louis Desroches debunks another science myth–the
Jack Lin legend of the lethal penny (back cover).
Copy Editor
Also new to the BSR, starting this fall we will be offering paid subscriptions to the magazine.
Tai Po Ping
So if you want to guarantee delivery of each BSR right to your door, or if you want to read our
Editors submission guidelines, peruse past issues, or check our upcoming events page, visit our website at
Meredith Carpenter sciencereview.berkeley.edu.
Michelangelo D’Agostino In the spirit of reflection brought on by this anniversary issue, I want to thank all of the editors,
Charlie Emrich writers, layout staff, illustrators, donors and, of course, readers who have contributed to the
success of the Berkeley Science Review these past five years. Many of our ranks have gone on to
Wendy Hansen
exciting careers in science journalism, public policy, and academia–and we continue to rely on
Jacqueline Chretien incoming Berkeley students of all types to keep the magazine running.
Charlie Koven
In looking back on our first Editor in Chief ’s opening letter, I realized that his comments were
just as true, and possibly more chilling today than ever. To quote Eran: “If my advisor knew how
Chief Layout Editor much time I’ve spent on this…he’d boot me out the door. I’d be working at Andersen Consulting
as fast as you can say ‘creative business solutions’.”
Andrew DeMond
Layout Editors Enjoy the issue,
Charlie Emrich
Wendy Hansen
Jessica Porter
Kathryn Quanstrom
Printer Jessica Porter
Sundance Press
© 2006 Berkeley Science Review. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, or transmitted in any form without express permission of the publishers.
Financial assistance for the 2005-2006 academic year was provided by Lawrence Berkeley National Lab; the UC Berkeley Office of the Vice Chancellor of Research;
the College of Natural Resources; the UC Berkeley Graduate Assembly; the Space Sciences Laboratory; the UC Berkeley Office of Research and Development;
and the Associated Students of the University of California (ASUC). Berkeley Science Review is not an official publication of the University of California, Berkeley,
or the ASUC. The content in this publication does not necessarily reflect the views of the University or the ASUC. Letters to the editor and story proposals
are encouraged and should be e-mailed to submissions@uclink.berkeley.edu or posted to the Berkeley Science Review, 10 Eshelman Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720.
Advertisers: contact advertise@uclink.berkeley.edu or visit http://sciencereview.berkeley.edu
COVER: SINGLE-CELLED ORGANISMS SUCH AS THOSE IN THE DRAWINGS ON THE FRONT AND BACK COVERS
BY W. SAVILLE KENT MAY REVEAL HOW ANIMALS EVOLVED TO BE MULTICELLULAR. STORY ON PAGE 16.
B ERKELEY S CIENCE R EVIEW SPRING 2006 3
review
Categories Current Briefs
48 Outreach 18 H2YDROPOWER
50 Slow Food
36 IP: Ideas for Purchase
51 Who Knew
40 Science And Sustainable
Development
Our 10th Issue
ɱ during
d its six daily passes. Who knows, it might IS
SUE aare undaunted—2006 has already
be
b above you right now. —CE
ɲ wwitnessed the christening of enigma,
F
A
1
0
LL
20
SP
2
sserpentine, and big bang. —MC
0
R
IN 0
G 2
3
F
A
2
L 0 R
IN 0
L 20
improving their fabrication. Now were optimistic about the upcoming G 2
MEMS have shrunk into NEMS, and mission of NASA’s Terrestrial Planet
a nano-electromechanical revolution has begun. Today, the Finder, a satellite designed specifically to identify new planets.
Maboudian lab is trying to make synthetic nanohairs that Since then, the news on planet finding has been mixed: While
mimic the surface of the ultra-sticky gecko foot to generate Marcy and colleagues have brought the list of known extrasolar
adhesives that stick to any surface, finally affording Lionel planets to 172, the orbiting Planet Finder mission has been, in
Richie his dream of dancing on the ceiling. —WM NASA-speak, “deferred indefinitely” due to budget cuts. —CK
Photo courtesy of Kellar Autumn
STAFF AUTHORS
Aaron Golub Jessica Palmer Aaron Pierce Heidi Anderson Michelangelo D’agostino
Ainsley Seago Jinjer Larson Adam Schindler Heidi Ledford Mike Daub
O ur first 9 issues were a lot of work and a lot of fun. Just yesterday, it seems, the BSR was merely an idea. Since Amber Wise Joel Kamnitzer Ainsley Seago Jane McGonigal Nathan Bramall
Andy DeMond Josephine Lee Alan Moses Janes Endres Howell Nathanael Johnson
Angie Morey Kaspar Mossman Allison Drew Janet Fang Noah Rolff
Anna Ross Kira O’Day Alysia Marino Jeffrey Natchtigal Noam Sagiv
then, grad students from all over the Berkeley campus have been slaving away to bring you what’s now the top Antoinette Chevalier
Bryan Jackson
C. Ric Mose
Carol Hunter
Kristen DeAngelis
Letty Brown
Lisa Green
Merek Siu
Aman Singh Gill
Angie Morey
Angie Morey
Annaliese Beery
Jennie Rose
Jennifer Skeene
Jennifer Skene
Jess Porter
Padraig Murphy
Prayana Khadye
Rachel Shreter
Rachel Teukolsky
Huge thanks go to everyone who helped along the way: the authors, editors, and layout people; the artists and Dan Handwerker
Delphine Farmer
Donna Sy
Tania Haddad
Teddy Varno
Temina Madon
Bill Monahan
Brendan Borrell
Carol Hunter
Julie Walters
Karen Levy
Karen Marcus
Sahelt S. R. Datta
Sarita Shaevitz
Shefa Gordon
Dula Parkinson Thomas Thomaidis Chad Heeter Kaspar Mossman Shena Gifford
photographers; all the faculty members we’ve badgered for stories; all of our advisors for “not minding” that we Elissa Preston
Eran Karmon
Heidi Ledford
Tony Le
Tony Wilson
Tracy Powell
Charlie Emrich
Charlie Koven
Cheryl Hackworth
Kira O’Day
Kristen DeAngelis
Letty Brown
Sherry Seethaler
Sheyna Gifford
Shirley Dang
Jane McGonigal Una Ren Chris Weber Lisa R. Girard Sneha Desai
weren’t in the lab; and most of all,YOU, for reading. Jess Porter
Jesse Dill
Jessica Marshall
Wendy Hansen
Wes Marner
Colin McCormick
Daisy James
Dan Roche
Loraine Lundquist
Loren Bentley
Lorraine Sadler
Stephanie Ewing
Steve Bodzin
Steven Bodzin
Delphine Farmer Louis-Benoit Desroches Teddy Varno
The totals: 428 pages, 183,971 words, 53 staffers, 96 authors. (not quite Conde Nast, but we’re getting there) Eliane Trepagnier
Elizabeth Read
Emily Singer
Eran Karmon
Marjorie James
Mark Abel
Melissa Fabros
Merek Siu
Temina Madon
Theresa Ho
Tracy Powell
Una Ren
Giovanna Guerrero Michael Downes Will Grover
W hen banks compete, you win, or so goes the slogan—but what about
contracts for nuclear labs? 2004 marked the first time that the
M ind over body.
This is what meditation
University of California, which has managed Lawrence Berkeley, Lawrence is supposed to achieve, and
Livermore, and Los Alamos National Labs since their formation in research by David Presti and
the 1940s and 50s, was forced to compete for their contracts. In colleagues into the physiological
April of 2005, UC received a 5-year contract to continue running effects of deep meditation in Buddhist
Lawrence Berkeley, the lab closest to home. Last December, monks seems to confirm it.When we caught
UC teamed up with industry to win a 7-year contract for Los up with Presti this spring, he had just returned
Alamos, out-competing the University of Texas ffrom another trip to the monasteries
aand Lockheed Martin. UC’s recent contract oof northern India.This time, Presti was
ssuccesses are helping to quiet rumors of lab tthere to teach, rather than to study, as
mmismanagement and bode well for the ppart of the 7th annual Science for Monks
LLivermore contract, up for competitive wworkshop. Each December since 2000, a
rrenewal in 2007. —WH ggroup of 50 Tibetan monk scholars have
IS
SUE
IS
SUE
ggathered at the Dehra Dun monastery to
F
R A
4
IN 0 LL 0
G 2 20
A
5
R
0
0 LL 0
800,000 computers are now crunching away IN
G 2 of scientific knowledge for partisan political 20
on fifteen BOINC-based projects. Its success has ends.” They charge the administration with
propelled it onto the cover of Science and into the suppressing and manipulating the results of studies on global climate change
pages of Nature. Now BOINC and climateprediction.net and environmental hazards, as well as systematically removing voices of
have teamed up with the BBC on a new climate change simulation dissent from scientific advisory boards. The administration released a point-
that will be followed and televised on Britain’s BBC-4. —MD by-point rebuttal of the statement, but the UCS statement has continued
to gather signatures—over 8,000 at last count.—JHC
I t’s hard to start a new journal, especially if you want to make it freely accessible to the
world. Ben Gutman reported the 2003 launch of the journal Public Library of Science
(PLoS) co-founded by Berkeley’s Michael Eisen. Less than two and half years later, the
‘library’ has grown by four: PLoS Medicine, PLoS Computational Biology, PLoS Genetics
and PLoS Pathogens, with a fifth, PLoS Clinical Trials, set to launch later this year. In June
SUE
IS of 2005, PLoS was ranked #1 among general biology journals—with an impact factor of
ɵ 13.9—placing it among the most highly cited journals in the life sciences. Not bad for a
publication that is barely older than the Schwarzenegger administration. —JP
F
A
3
LL 0
20
Bull’s-Eye!
he archery range isn’t the only place you see a bull’s-eye. Another striking example—one million times smaller—occurs at the immune
T synapse, a complex junction that forms between an immune system T cell and an infected or infection-detecting cell. The structure consists
of a variety of molecules which signal to each other, activating T cells and leading to a large-scale immune response. Among these molecules are
T cell receptors, which initially cluster at the periphery of the synapse. Eventually, the receptors move towards the inside of the bull’s-eye and
stop signaling. What happens if you block inward movement of these molecules? Researchers in Jay Groves’s lab at UC Berkeley have done just
this, using patterns of 100nm thick chromium particles as roadblocks to restrict the mobility of receptor clusters. One pattern blocked inward
transport of the receptors, forcing them to stay corralled on the periphery of the synapse. The peripheral receptors continued to signal, a result
that established a direct link between the spatial position of T cell receptors in the synapse and the duration of signaling. Apparently, hitting the
bull’s-eye of the immune synapse doesn’t score you any points, at least as far as signaling is concerned. - Hari Shroff
Firewalk With Me
hen did humans first enter the Americas? Most textbooks would say 11,500 years ago, so history was thrown for a loop in 2005 when
W a team from the UK claimed to find 40,000 year old human footprints in Puebla, Mexico. Many archaeologists were skeptical of the
results because the footprints were found in carbon-poor volcanic ash, making the group’s radiocarbon dating methods questionable. More
troublesome, “the prints in Mexico were not arranged in [a right foot-left foot pattern]. There may have been two right footprints in a row and
then another print,” said Paul Renne, adjunct Professor of Earth and Planetary Science at UC Berkeley. A team led by Renne re-dated the rock
at 1.3 million years using argon dating—more reliable for material older than 50,000 years. Later, measurements of the latent magnetism of
the rock showed that the ash had to have cooled more than 790,000 years ago. With recent genetic studies suggesting Homo sapiens is at most
200,000 years old and data indicating the ash fell while still hot, it seems likely that the “footprints” are just dents in the ground. Despite the
initial buzz, a rewrite of human history is unlikely to star our 1.3 million-year-old, firewalking American ancestors. - Angie Morey
Richter Scale
mm ... fuzzy dots ... Or so you might think to yourself upon entering the lobby of the de Young Museum in San Francisco as you gaze at the
H giant mural on the west wall. But this is no piece of abstract art. Rather, it’s an image of gritty realism. You are looking at the crystal lattice of
the material strontium titanate (SrTiO3) as seen by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. As a commission for the de Young’s October
2005 reopening, German artist Gerhard Richter (one of the most expensive living artists in the world) created Strontium by manipulating micro-
graphs from researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Metal Research and then applying his signature blurring of images. In the mural we see this
material’s “perovskite” structure as horizontal lines of bright Sr-O columns separated by lines of more closely-spaced, alternating Ti and O columns.
Perovskites aren’t just pretty to look at though. Berkeley physicist Marvin Cohen’s theoretical studies of SrTiO3 in the 1960s played a role in the
discovery of the high-temperature superconductors, and materials scientist Ramamoorthy Ramesh is working on perovskites for nonvolatile RAM
that won’t lose your data when the power goes off. Strontium may be a glimpse inside your next computer. - David Strubbe
Outbreak
nyone who has ever had the flu knows just how tempting it is to briefly sneak out of the house during those first few incredibly boring,
A albeit highly contagious, days. “How many people could really be at the Tuesday matinee of ‘Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire’?” you may
have thought to yourself. This type of reasoning can lead to a superspreading event in which an infected individual, dubbed a “superspreader,”
prolifically transmits a disease. Historically, models of disease propagation have ignored these events and treated all individuals as having the
same infectiousness. However James Lloyd-Smith, a recent graduate of the Getz lab at UC Berkeley, has confirmed that individual variability is a
key factor in the spread of many diseases. Measles, for example, was introduced to Greenland by a superspreading sailor who infected an aston-
ishing 250 people at a dance party. Lloyd-Smith’s work also demonstrated that these diseases exhibit a qualitatively different mode of spreading.
They are the high risk venture capitalists of the disease world: Prone to early extinction, they do exceedingly well only if they are lucky enough
to infect a superspreader. Therefore, intensive disease control (e.g., quarantine) of randomly selected individuals is more effective than uniform
but moderate treatment of the entire population in suppressing diseases that spread in this manner. Moreover, if we can learn how to identify
superspreaders during an outbreak, treatment of these individuals would be an effective method of preventing an epidemic. Unfortunately, this
makes a pretty strong argument for waiting to see Harry Potter on DVD. - David Richmond
1IPUPDPVSUTFZPG,BTQBS.PTTNBO
1IPUPDPVSUTFZPG+BNFT-MPZE4NJUI 1IPUPCZ$IBSMJF,PWFO
A Star is Born
Page 12
The Origins of Cacao
Earthquake Prediction othing satisfies a craving like the subtle
Page 20
N flavors of fine chocolate. Every year, over
three million tons of cacao, the raw material for
chocolate, are produced worldwide. For a food
H2ydropower loved by so many though, the origins of cacao
remain a mystery. UC Berkeley anthropologist
Page 18 Rosemary Joyce now thinks she may have found
the answer: beer.
Like Beer for Chocolate Cacao is produced from the almond-shaped
seeds of the quirky rainforest tree Theobroma cacao,
Page 10
a native of the Amazon and Orinoco river basins
(cacao is the name of the tree and its seeds while
Mammoth Rocks cocoa is the name of the defatted powder made
from the finely ground seeds). The seeds grow in
Page 14
pods hanging from the trunk of the tree. Monkeys
and other forest animals split these pods open
Seeing Chemistry to reach the sweet, juicy pulp that surrounds the
30–40 seeds inside. Raw, the seeds are bitter and
Page 22
inedible.To produce the raw material for chocolate,
they must be fermented, dried, and roasted.
United We Stand No one knows when humans first began
UC Berkeley anthropologist Rosemary Joyce has
discovered evidence of chocolate residues on Meso-
Page 16 to consume cacao. We do know that in the early american pottery from as early as 1100 BCE.
1500s, Columbus, Cortez, and other Spaniards
noted the widespread use of cacao throughout and southern Mexico that nurtured the Olmec,
Mesoamerica—the region of Central America Mayan, and Aztec civilizations. Joyce has recently
discovered chemical residues of cacao beverages
The Mayas and Aztecs believed that a feathered ser- on pottery shards dating to 1100 BCE, but the use
pent god discovered cacao and gave it to humans. of cacao could have begun even earlier.
A Star is Born
he night sky is an awe-inspiring sight. From the the theory of “gravitational collapse,” which Don- lowed them to simulate star-forming regions with
T ancients who sat around fires telling creation
stories about the constellations to modern day
ald Rumsfeld might describe as “you form a star
with the mass you have, not the mass you wish
unparalleled precision. While the image of a small
star growing in a placid cloud of gas is attractive
astrophysicists, the question has always been “how you had.” Imagine that, in the heat of a snowball for its simplicity, the reality is much more complex.
did that get there?” With the advent of orbiting fight, you grab a handful of snow and compress it. Therefore, modeling star formation requires calcu-
space telescopes, we’ve finally been able to begin The snowball’s final weight is determined as soon lating interactions between swirling clouds of gas
answering this question. as you pick up the snow to form it. Similarly, a star which change dramatically over time—calculations
The basics of star birth are now well under- formed by gravitational collapse has already col- which are far too complicated to solve without
stood. Enormous regions of gas, sometimes light- lected most of its mass by the time it undergoes such serious computational resources.
years wide, swirl around and occasionally develop its initial compression. The results of the team’s simulations pinpoint
clumps. Over the course of a few million years, the The competitive accretion theory was the failure of competitive accretion theory to one
clumps grow as their gravity sucks in nearby gas. originally developed in response to some of the crucial phenomenon: turbulence. Turbulence mani-
These “protostars” eventually collapse under their shortcomings of gravitational collapse. Early mod- fests itself in everyday life—open a water faucet
own weight, turning their now-dense interiors into els of star forming regions suggested that the rush too far, and a smooth flow turns into a chaotic
infernos. Soon the star is hot enough that hydrogen of escaping light from a young star would gener- mess. It’s no surprise, then, that turbulence also
atoms begin to collide and fuse together to create ate extreme outward pressures. This would keep makes itself known in the chaos and flowing
new elements—fusion—liberating the energy that more gas from falling in and would prevent large gases present in star formation. While competi-
powers the star, some of which eventually escapes stars, more than five to ten times the mass of the tive accretion theorists had included some initial
as starlight. Sun, from forming in a single initial compression turbulence in their simulations, they let it artifi-
This straightforward story of star forma- event. A quick telescopic survey of the sky, how- cially decay over time (as turbulence usually does
tion still holds secrets and big questions. Even ever, reveals many stars this heavy. To reconcile unless there’s energy to sustain it). In the Berkeley
medium-sized stars like our Sun are heavy beasts, theory with such observations, astronomers researchers’ simulations, the light and gas flowing
needing millions of times the mass of the Earth to proposed that these stars formed in the gradual out from the protostar itself fuels even more tur-
sustain fusion. So how do protostars manage to manner suggested by competitive accretion theory. bulence, maintaining it long after the initial tumult
collect such a huge quantity of matter? In the No- While further work has since resolved these early would die down. The proof, as they say, is in the
vember 17, 2005 issue of Nature, three Berkeley problems with the theory of gravitational collapse, telescopic pudding; According to McKee, “no one
astrophysicists—professors Chris McKee, Richard competitive accretion still hung around as a viable has ever seen a region where the turbulence has
Klein, and Mark Krumholz (once their graduate alternative model of star formation. decayed.”
student and now a post-doctoral researcher at Through computer simulations, Krumholz, Although it seems that Krumholz, McKee,
Princeton)—think they’ve answered this question McKee, and Klein now think they’ve put the last and Klein have firmly kicked competitive accretion
for good. nail in the coffin for the theory of competitive to the curb, the controversy may burn on as other
Two dueling theories have been proposed to accretion. Their work suggests that, though com- theorists respond to these claims. In the meantime,
describe the manner by which protostars collect petitive accretion might work in certain types of stargazers rest assured: the next time you look
all their matter. The first, known as “competitive star-forming regions, nobody has actually observed at the stars and wonder where they came from,
accretion,” likens building a star to building the any. In addition to observations of seven star-form- someone is assiduously working on an answer.
head of a snowman. A small, dense clump, only a ing regions, a key player in the team’s success was
fraction of its final weight, gradually accumulates the incredible computing power available to them JESSE DILL and HARISH AGARWAL are graduate students
nearby matter, suggesting that a star can start small at the San Diego Supercomputer Center and in biophysics and physics, respectively.
and grow huge over time. In the other corner sits Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, which al-
MAMMOTH ROCKS
#FSLFMFZSFTFBSDIFSTàOEFWJEFODFPGBODJFOUTDSBUDIJOHQPTUTPOUIF4POPNBDPBTU
chimps is not hard to grasp. The idea of our they are also poorly understood. UC Berkeley swim, powered by a whip-like flagellum, through
common heritage with other mammals is also not Molecular and Cell Biology and Integrative Biol- many of today’s marine and fresh waters. But
a stretch—rat or monkey, we all share mammalian ogy professor Nicole King and her lab want to how exactly do these simple cells offer a window
faces, sets of limbs, live births, and fur. But go back find out more. more than half a billion years into the ancient
further along the animal lineage and things start The search starts with the genetic tools re- past, when the first animals appeared?
to get blurry. What’s the story of the first four- quired to be multicellular: genes that control cell The key is knowledge of the tree of life. Re-
limbed beings to walk the land? Go further back. adhesion (the glue that binds cells), cell signaling cent studies have established that choanoflagel-
What creature gave rise to the first bilaterally sym- (allowing cell-to-cell communication), and cell lates are the single-celled organisms most closely
metrical organisms, ancestors of everything from differentiation (establishing multiple cell types to related to multicellular animals. In fact, choano-
flagellates even resemble the specialized feeding
cells found in sponges (the most basic multicel-
lular animal). Thus, it was probably descendents
of an early choanoflagellate ancestor—close
cousins of the choanoflagellate lineage—who
participated in the evolution of multicellularity,
and today’s choanoflagellates likely remain com-
parable to these pioneers in many ways. Research
from other groups indicates that every animal
species evolved from this single evolutionary
step—though multicellularity evolved multiple
times elsewhere on the tree of life (among plants,
fungi, slime molds, and others), it happened just
once for animals. So, for insight into animal ori-
gins, the choanoflagellate genetic code is required
reading. And thanks to recent advances in genome
sequencing (decoding the entire genetic contents of
organisms), King can employ the powerful tool of
comparative genomics to make sense of this code.
Images courtesy of Melissa Motts/Current Biology (left) and Susan Young (right).
By stacking the choanoflagellate genome
Choanoflagellates stained to show their flagella (green), collars (red), and DNA (blue). (Left) individual cells; (right)
up against animals and more distantly related
a colony of cells.
groups like plants and fungi, King can determine
which gene families are shared only by animals
flatworms and beetles to sharks and wolves? Or allow for division of labor). Understanding the and choanoflagellates. Already, King’s group has
even further back in time, down near the base of evolution of these essential functions likely holds identified choanoflagellate versions of cell signal-
the tree of life, to that clichéd primordial ooze the key to understanding how animals appeared ing and adhesion gene families previously consid-
that spawned the first animals. and flourished. ered unique to animals. These are two parts of a
It was at that time, some 600 million years
ago, that one of the most pivotal evolutionary
leaps in the history of life took place. In a largely
choanos sponges jellyfish arthropods mollusks starfish vertebrates
unicellular world far different from ours, a group
of single-celled organisms joined together and
became one multicellular organism, opening the
door to a novel range of evolutionary possibili-
ties. This was the birth of a new way of life, the
founding event of the storied animal kingdom. But
as important as these early events in the tran-
time
According to the animal family tree (not to scale), choanoflagellates diverged from
the animal lineage right before the emergence of multicellularity. This means that
choanoflagellates are more closely related to multicellular animals than any other emergence of
non-animal we know of so far. Study of these organisms may help us understand multicellularity
which characteristics of multicellularity the single-celled ancestor of animals already
possessed and which had to evolve during the transition to multicellularity.
BRIEF
organisms is exciting, but it also raises a paradox—
how and why did the machinery of multicellular
organisms evolve in a lineage that continues to live
the single-celled way of life? What is the pre-his-
tory of the most basic animal gene groups?
The evolutionary role of genes has everything
to do with their functions, and it is the function
of these key gene groups in unicellular organisms
that King wants to uncover. For example, hungry
choanoflagellates attach to and engulf unsuspecting
bacteria, a process King argues could be the single-
cell antecedent to cellular adhesion. And protozoa
are known in some instances to respond both to
other organisms and their environment based on
secreted proteins, a potential precursor to the kind
of cell-to-cell signaling essential in animals. Some
species of choanoflagellates even form colonies,
though the function of the colony in the life cycle
of the organism is still unclear.
The function of the gene groups later co-
opted for animal multicellularity is only part of the
picture. King is also interested in other aspects of
that lost unicellular world, such as the external fac-
tors that shaped the development of multicellular-
ity. Here too are ideas to be tested. A multicellular
body is more than any unicellular predator could
swallow, so perhaps multicellularity evolved as a de-
fense strategy. Also, choanoflagellates use the same
cell parts to power their flagella and to divide into
new daughter cells. Because of this constraint, the
first multicellular animals (and perhaps choanofla-
gellate colonies) may have benefited from a divi-
sion of labor between swimming cells and dividing
cells—the world had not yet seen organisms that
could simultaneously grow and move.
Many details in the story of animal origins re-
main mysterious. But King’s work has established
that further study of the evolution and biology of
choanoflagellates will shed more light on this 600-
million-year-old story. As King says, “let protozoa
show the way.” N
H2YDROPOWER
BRIEF
hether it’s air quality, a desire to protect of testing the Daimler-Chrysler F-Cell, a fuel cell infrastructure development. Hydrogen can be
W pristine Alaskan wilderness, political
instability in the Middle East, or dwindling supply
vehicle that runs on compressed hydrogen gas.
Daimler-Chrysler wants to get its car out
stored and dispensed in a variety of forms—as
a liquid, as compressed gas at a number of
in the face of increasing global demand, there are for some real road experience to expose any different pressures, and as a metal hydride. Most
many reasons to move away from our current problems.Tim Lipman and Susan Shaheen, Berkeley cars available now, including the F-Cell, require
petroleum-based economy. While a number of researchers and co-managers of the project, compressed gas at 5000 psi, and most fueling
alternative fuel options are under investigation, plan to put the car through its paces by using it stations are being built to accommodate this type
when it comes to cars, these days hydrogen is all as a company vehicle for business-related trips. of vehicle. In an effort to support the hydrogen
the rage. Each night, the F-Cell is parked in a special spot economy, Governor Schwarzenegger plans to
Hydrogen is appealing because it reacts very where it wirelessly relays the day’s performance increase the number of hydrogen fueling stations
cleanly and efficiently with oxygen to release data back to Daimler-Chrysler in Germany. This in California from the 16 currently in place to at
energy inside a fuel cell, producing water as the approach will also allow Lipman and Shaheen to least 50 by the year 2010.
only byproduct. However, a number of practical and investigate an interest of their own: the role of However, current hydrogen storage techniques
technical potholes lie in the road to the hydrogen hydrogen-powered cars as fleet vehicles. One have serious shortcomings. Compressed hydrogen
future. From issues of infrastructure to hydrogen of the major obstacles facing the development gas requires extremely high pressures and a heavy
storage, Berkeley researchers are working to of any new fuel is the lack of refueling stations. storage cylinder, reducing its efficiency. For example,
smooth that road and to help hydrogen realize its In a fleet setting though, companies can make just compressing hydrogen to 3000 psi costs
promise as the ultimate fuel. arrangements for fueling and for repair that would about 20% of its potential energy. Furthermore,
The future of the hydrogen economy looks likely inconvenience individual owners. The PATH compressed gas vehicles have very limited range
bright at Partners for Advanced Transit and F-Cell gets its hydrogen fix from a special station due to the size and weight of the storage cylinder
Highways (PATH), a branch of Berkeley’s Institute in Richmond. required. Liquid hydrogen is another option used in
of Transportation Studies. Headquartered in Outside of a fleet setting, ease of use is a top some cars, but its storage requires a heavy cooling
an old converted home down a dusty road off priority for private vehicle owners, so without system to maintain temperatures of around -250o
Highway 580, the weathered building belies the the appropriate infrastructure, even the most Celsius (20 Kelvin).
innovative work being done inside. This past promising technology is likely to fail. In the case of In contrast, the ideal storage system is
December, PATH researchers began two years hydrogen, the variety of fueling options complicates lightweight and able to store a lot of hydrogen
EARTHQUAKE PREDICTION
What if you could see 30 seconds into the future...
In the north entrance hall of UC Berkeley’s to have revived both the expectations, and the down power plants before their pipes rupture, or
Doe Library, a large memorial poster hangs on the skepticism, surrounding earthquake warning. even initiate a public alarm system.
wall recapping “The History of a Disaster.” With a There has always been debate in the
black-and-white photo showing foot-wide cracks seismological community over whether the first
in the ground, the poster charts the devastating, P-wave actually provides useful information about
260-mile, minute-long tear through San Francisco an earthquake’s ultimate magnitude before it ends.
of the Great Quake of 1906. On the quake’s 100th The dominant theory, the “cascade model” of fault
anniversary, the banner commemorates the Uni-
versity’s contribution to search and rescue efforts
and to the medical care and temporary sheltering
of refugees. “On April 18, 1906 at 5:12 am,” the
memorial poster’s subtitle reads, “the San Andreas
Fault ruptured in a magnitude 7.9 earthquake...” When an earthquake occurs, two types of
But rewind 100 years to the first few seismic waves are created. The first, called the “P”
seconds of that minute-long rupturing, shaking, or primary wave, is a burst of pressure, like a really
and jolting. While people were just beginning loud sound. The second, called the “S” or secondary
to feel the earth’s movement, the quake’s full wave, consists of violent back-and-forth shaking,
magnitude would remain unknown until well after what seismologists call shear. Allen and Olson
its calamitous completion. What if, instead, one hope to exploit the basic fact that the P-wave
could predict the magnitude of an earthquake just travels faster than the S-wave (hence it’s name), All Photos courtesy of the Bancroft Library
as it is beginning to occur? Furthermore, what if while the S-wave is responsible for most of the rupture, argues that rupture spreads from one
such knowledge could allow for precious seconds quake’s damage. So, the thinking goes, if detectors patch of the fault to another neighboring one like
of warning? Such a task has stymied generations can interpret the strength of the impending S-wave falling dominos. All activity terminates when the
of researchers, and the feasibility—let alone the the instant they detect the first P-wave, they gain a rupture energy falls below a certain threshold
accuracy—of such prediction still remains conten- few seconds—up to 70 seconds depending on how necessary to move the next patch. This theory
tious. Now, a paper, published in the November far they are from where the earth ruptures—to do predicts that small and large earthquakes both
10 issue of Nature by UC Berkeley seismologist things like warn emergency personnel before their start out identically; the ultimate size of the
Richard Allen and colleague Erik Olson seems communications networks are interrupted, shut earthquake is only determined as the earthquake
BRIEF
ultimate magnitude of an earthquake is information is not that strong,” says William Ellsworth, former located near Mendocino triple-junction,
contained in the frequency of shaking that occurs chief scientist with the US Geological Survey around 200 km NW of the Bay Area.
in the P-wave. In contrast to the cascade model, (USGS) in Menlo Park, California. Ellsworth also Fast-moving P-waves and slower but
their model predicts that there is a deterministic urges caution, warning that, even if researchers more destructive S-waves begin
relationship between the initial shaking and the find a correlation, there is a large step from radiating outward from epicenter.
final earthquake energy. A key difference between demonstrating a correlation to developing a
the two schools of thought is what signal to look reliable early warning system that operates on the 3 sec. P-waves reach the nearest detec-
for. “They look at the amplitude of the initial finding. Ten years ago, he and Stanford University’s tors, which begin analyzing the frequency
rupture, which is how much it shakes,” Allen says Gregory Beroza examined the relation between content of the seismic waves.
of his colleagues in the cascade model camp, “while initial amplitude and final earthquake magnitude.
we look at the frequency, that is how quickly While their results were consistent with Allen’s 7 sec. The ElarmS analysis requires 4
it shakes.” they did not go on to design a warning system, seconds of P-wave data to make an
partly because of the high cost such a system initial prediction of earthquake intensity.
would require. The algorithm decides the earthquake
is likely to be powerful and initiates the
warning system.
In a 2003 study, Allen and Professor Hiroo 30 sec. S-waves reach the Bay Area.
Kanamori, a Caltech colleague, found such a Shaking begins in earnest...
relationship between the frequency content of
the quake’s first four seconds and its ultimate
magnitude. Their sample consisted of southern would use real-time data fed from monitoring
California earthquakes with magnitudes 3.0 to stations to predict a final quake magnitude.
7.3 (only 3 of which had a magnitude greater than Michael Blanpied, associate coordinator of the
6.0). In Allen’s latest study of 71 quakes—24 of agency’s Earthquake Hazards Program in Reston,
which were 6.0 or greater—they examined both Virginia, said in an interview that his agency
the velocity and acceleration caused by the P Allen is continuing his work. While he admits has received three different proposed testing
wave. They found a high correlation between the that it will most likely take several years to make techniques, including Allen’s. The algorithms show
frequency content of the P wave’s first few sec- certain how accurate the method is, he is seeking some promise, Blanpied said. “But there is an
onds and the final magnitude, further reinforcing funding, primarily from the USGS, to begin testing open question whether it is possible to distinguish
the deterministic theory of earthquake rupture. the system, which he calls ElarmS. The test system between magnitude 5 and 7 earthquakes in a very
short amount of time, although it’s quite possible
to use only a few seconds to tell magnitudes of
up to 5.”
With a two-year initial investment of
$100,000 per year, Blanpied says, the USGS
expects to get a sense of how much improvement
would be needed to make the algorithms work.
These funds are being channeled to Berkeley
and to Caltech to start the necessary computer
programming and to provide grants to researchers
and graduate students for the current feasibility
testing. “A lot of us hope that this would work
well,” Blanpied said. “Great things could be done.
This has very exciting prospects.” N
Seeing Chemistry
Berkeley scientists peek into the ultra-fast
BRIEF
beta-carotene-rich carrots are good for your eyes.) undergo the full twist when Graduate student Phil Kukura stands over part of the complicated optical system
When retinal absorbs light, it twists, forc- it absorbs light. As gradu- that can watch atoms move during a chemical reaction.
ing the surrounding rhodopsin protein to change ate student Phil Kukura,
shape and kicking off a long chain of events that lead author on the study,
retina
iris
“cis”
light
lens
rod cells
cornea optic nerve
“trans”
(Left) The human eye senses light on its back surface—the retina, which is made up of hundreds of millions of rod and cone cells.The cone cells are responsible for color vision
and the rod cells (middle) handle low-light vision. Each rod cell is packed with the protein rhodopsin, which actually absorbs and senses light.The first step in vision occurs in the
molecule retinal that’s buried within each rhodopsin protein. When exposed to light, retinal undergoes a reaction that twists the molecule (as shown above right) from the “cis”
to “trans” configuration. Each of the atoms in retinal is represented as a ball and bonds between those atoms are drawn as sticks.The motion of two hydrogen atoms (shown in
green) was key to understanding why our eyes are such good light detectors.
BRIEF
atoms around the length of the realized it’s never going to work, because there’s a
retinal. The seemingly insignifi- million reasons why this [shouldn’t] work… It was
cant swing of these hydrogen completely accidental that we saw what we did and
atoms kicks off all the events interpreted it the way we did.” Indeed, it took over
leading to vision, like a snow- a year for analysis and double-checking between
ball starting an avalanche. But the time the measurements were made and when
hydrogen—the lightest of all at- the paper was written.
oms—moves extremely fast in Despite the huge amount that’s already
chemical reactions, making it al- known about vision, these results may have long
most impossible to track using legs. Rhodopsin belongs to a class of proteins called
standard measuring techniques. G-protein coupled receptors that are responsible
How fast? A few femtoseconds. for many kinds of communication and signaling
A femtosecond is a millionth of within the body. In fact, more than 70% of drugs
a billionth of a second, or as Ku- on the market target G-protein coupled recep-
kura puts it, “There are as many tors. Understanding how these receptors work is
femtoseconds in a minute as fundamental to drug development. Kukura sums it
there are minutes in the exis- up with an unintended pun, saying, “This technique
tence of the universe.” certainly has a bright future.” N
One of the fundamen-
tal reasons that this reaction occurs so CHARLIE EMRICH is a graduate student in biophysics.
fast is that speed is inexorably linked to
efficiency: All efficient reactions happen Want to know more?
quickly, and the eye is a very efficient light Check out: “Structural Observation of the Pri-
detector. To detect these ultra-fast chang- mary Isomerization in Vision with Femtosecond-
es in molecules, Kukura and colleagues Stimulated Raman”: Kukura, P. et al, Science 310, pp.
developed a technique called femtosecond 1006–1009 (2005).
stimulated resonance Raman spectrosco-
py. In essence, they fire extremely short
pulses of laser light at the rhodopsin and
look at the changes in the color of light
that bounces off of it.
Photos by Charlie Emrich
This brings me to another thing that
(Top) Kukura points to the small piece of glass that
I learned in high-school chemistry: All molecules makes ultra-fast pulses of laser light needed to study fast
and atoms are constantly vibrating, as if they’ve chemical reactions. Laser light that goes in a single color
been put together with springs. This much was comes out as a spectrum of colors—an odd consequence
of how short the pulses are.
right, but what the teachers left out was that each
type of molecule has its own signature vibrations
(Bottom) These lasers got bling. A green laser shines at a
that can tell scientists a wealth about what the mol- large sapphire, whose red glow becomes the pulsing heart
ecule is, how it is arranged, how it bumps up against of the system producing femto-second laser pulses.
its neighbors, and even about tiny shifts in the posi-
tions of the atoms that make it up.
As Kukura puts it, “If you wanted to stretch
a human being [to] twice his size, it takes a couple
of horses. To stretch a molecule to twice its length
also takes a certain amount of energy, and you can
actually measure those energies.”
The wiggling atoms in a molecule can absorb
small, characteristic amounts of energy from light
as it hits the molecule. By deciphering subtle chang-
es in the color of reflected light, scientists can infer
which wavelengths of light were absorbed and use
this information to draw a picture of a molecule
like retinal—hydrogens and all.
Measuring these energies requires a sophis-
One of the last moving parts in your computer is the hard drive
BRIEF
more important. by the wiggling of surrounding molecules—that is, To meet this challenge, engineers are
If the concentric tracks were perfectly circular thermal energy. The amount of energy required to exploring new approaches to saving space by
and centered around the axis of the spinning disk, flip the orientation of one of these magnetic zones reorienting bits so that they stand up vertically.
the task would be relatively easy. But real life is decreases as the size of the zone shrinks. Once the Another approach is to use more stable magnetic
not so simple. In practice the tracks are slightly magnetic zones are small enough, ambient thermal materials that require a laser to heat small areas
off center (like the grooves on many records), energy alone will be enough to flip a bit of data. of the disk while data is written. The mechanical
and any movement of the disk—knocking your The smallest a bit can get without spontaneously advances being developed at Berkeley’s CML
laptop, dropping your iPod, or just vibration from flipping is the superparamagnetic limit. may well prove critical to appeasing the world’s
the cooling fans—can bump the slider off its flight Until recently, “magneticians” predicted insatiable appetite for data storage.
path. This means that the head’s position has to be that this limit would be reached at a density of
actively controlled on the sub-millisecond scale. 100 billion bits/square inch. But the folks at the MEREK SIU is a graduate student in biophysics.
Horowitz and fellow mechanical engineering CML along with the national Information Storage
professor Masayoshi Tomizuka are working on
the problem of keeping the read/write head over Want to know more?
the data tracks as the disk spins and is jarred by Check out the
external vibrations. Berkeley Computer Mechanics Lab:
Even if Bogy and his colleagues at the CML cml.berkeley.edu
N AT U R E
In the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology (MVZ), director Craig Moritz walks to a row of cabinets and
pulls out a shelf. Inside lie rows of chipmunks, carefully stuffed and labeled, with a tiny skull sealed in a glass jar next to each.
To the untrained observer, they look like replicas of the same species. To Moritz, they tell a story that crosses the boundaries of both space
and time. These specimens are part of a unique biological survey project launched by Joseph Grinnell, the museum’s first director, in 1908. The
Grinnell survey, which lasted over 30 years, covered over 700 locations spanning the state of California. The resulting database, encompassing over
20,000 specimens, 13,000 pages of field notes, and 2,000 photographs, represents one of the most comprehensive collections of its kind in the world.
Photo by Adam
Adam Leaché
Leaché
The Grinnell resurvey project began in 2002 here in Chipmunks enjoy some of the benefits of acupunc- Each mouse specimen is carefully labeled with in-
picturesque Yosemite. Researchers have spent the ture while awaiting transfer to the Museum of Ver- formation on where and when it was collected.
past three summers collecting specimens and re- tebrate Zoology where they will join the rest of the Skulls, useful to taxonomists for identifying closely
canvassing the original Grinnell sites. Grinnell collection. related species, are preserved in small glass jars.
Photo byAdam
AdamLeaché
Leaché Photo by Erica Spotswood
site is chosen close by and traps are set out for The presences are more straightforward. If a spe- fort. Juan Para, a PhD student in integrative bi-
four days. Here, too, it is impossible to mimic pre- cies is found and you have a good taxonomist to ology, spent a year sifting through 13,000 pages
cisely the methods Grinnell used. For one thing, identify it (and a specimen to prove it), you know of field notes recording every mammal caught
Grinnell’s team shot animals—something that’s it was there. But how do you prove something is on every trap line between 1910 and 1925. The
impossible inside the park, and impractical, at really not there if you can’t find it? database shows that small mammals have been
FEATURE
best, outside of it. As a result, the resurvey team Moritz is working with population biologist moving around in some surprising ways. Several
does not survey for carnivores (which are usually Steve Beissinger from the Department of Envi- species have shown a shift in their altitudinal
larger, rarer, and more difficult to trap without ronmental Science, Policy, and Management to ranges of up to 2,000 meters. Four species not
shooting them), though they have made use of build models of how “trappable” each species is originally found in the park have expanded their
data collected by the park to inform them about by looking at the total number of sites and the ranges upward in elevation into the park. Four
current distributions. animals observed at each site. Mammal curator species of small mammals which were formerly
The traps they use are different as well. Live Chris Conroy explains that by using this method, common have contracted their ranges. One, the
traps are used in the resurvey, whereas a small “If an animal was always trapped on every trap shadow chipmunk (Tamias senex), has gone from
lethal trap called the “museum special” was used line, every night, you get an idea that it is an easily being very common to virtually non-existent.
for most of the small mammals in the original sur- trapped animal. If you then go to a place and don’t In some cases, the reasons for these chang-
vey. Named for its niche market, the trap protect- trap it, you can be more confident that it truly es in species distribution are related to fire. Since
ed the skull by breaking an animal’s neck instead isn’t there and that you didn’t just miss it.” the mid 20th century, the National Park Service
of hitting it on the head. Valuable to taxonomists, has aggressively suppressed fires inside the park.
the skull is used in identifying closely related spe- But how do you prove Comparing current photographs with those
cies. Current bird survey methods have also been something is really not there taken during the original Grinnell survey show
modified slightly. The surveyors still walk along a if you can’t find it? marked increases in tree density, as well as some
path, as Grinnell did, but now birds are surveyed encroachment of trees into what were once
only at specific points along the way. At these Determining what was trapped and when meadows. Corresponding decreases in the abun-
locations, called point counts, all birds heard or during the original survey has also proved more dance of small mammals that prefer forest floors
seen over a seven minute period are recorded. difficult than expected. Roughly three times more that are open with dappled sunlight, such as the
information exists in the field notes than in the Golden Mantled Ground Squirrel, are easy to ex-
Survey Says… specimen collection. The field notes are scanned plain when one considers the increase in forest
Equipped with volumes of data from the two and available for anyone to view online via the canopy density. But there are other species in
surveys of Yosemite, a small army of people associ- MVZ webpage, but there is currently no easy way which no such explanation can be found. Why, for
ated with the MVZ is now working to analyze and to search this database, other than, of course, by example, has the piñon mouse expanded its range
catalog the differences in vertebrate communities looking through each entry. The museum wants into the park? Now found 2,000 meters higher in
between the two time periods. Documenting and to make this simpler, and they are working to elevation at locations as high as 10,200 feet, the
verifying these changes is no small feat though. In develop software to recognize key words in the mouse has been trapped miles from the its near-
order to prove beyond all reasonable doubt that field notes or to convert them all into text. For est preferred habitat of piñon pines and junipers.
a species is present where it did not exist before now though, each question asked can only be an- Likewise, the alpine chipmunk and the American
(or vice versa), one must be able to show that the swered by hiring someone to pore through all of pika were formerly common at elevations as low
absence of that species was because it was not the field notes. as 7,800 feet. Far less numerous today, neither has
there and not simply because it was not found. In some cases, this has been worth the ef- been found below 9,500 feet.
FEATURE
to what the mammal researchers have been find- used to predict past species distribution based on these species are predicted to shrink, eventually
ing, bird diversity appears to be increasing inside past climate, which can then be compared to the leading to their extinction. These patterns should
the park. Birds such as the blue winged teal are original Grinnell survey findings. be visible much sooner in animals than in plants
now found breeding in the high lakes of Yosemite. because they move around so much faster.
These birds look for lakes that are free of ice to Other explanations for the altitudinal shifts
land in. Earlier ice-out dates associated with glob- The assumption is that the in mammal distributions do exist, and more work
al warming could be the explanation. Addition- locations differ in climate, and needs to be done before the Grinnell team will
ally, several high elevation species are declining in nothing else. In practice, nature be able to say with certainty if climate change is
is never so simple.
numbers. Thus similar evidence across the very to blame. One hurdle in this research is the lack
different bird and mammal taxa suggest that climate of a good control—a place where the climate is
change may be an important factor influencing the As Monahan explains, the project provides known not to change—since climate change is a
declines in abundance of high elevation species. an opportunity to train the models and increase worldwide phenomenon. It’s also possible that
To explore further the impacts of climate their accuracy, which can then be used to more competition between species for similar resourc-
change on the survey species, researchers have precisely predict how species will change in the es like food could be the cause of the shifts in
been using climate data from the early 1900s to future. What they have done so far is preliminary. population—a good hypothesis, but one that is
develop species distribution models. Most clima- “For some species, the model did really well difficult to measure. The Grinnell resurvey team
tologists do not have access to species distribu- while for others, the model did a horrible job,” he has not looked closely enough at the behavior
tion data from multiple time periods and therefore adds. But when Jim Patton looked at the predic- of the study species to rule competition out as
cannot directly test how species have moved as tions for the alpine chipmunk, what he saw was an explanation. Only further research and the
the climate has warmed.To get around this, models accurate. “If you model its distribution based on completion of the current resurvey project can
must look at changes across many locations during Grinnell climate and distribution and then predict hope to shed more light on the potential causes
the same period of time. The assumption is that its distribution now, you actually see this altitudi- of these observed trends.
the locations differ in climate, and nothing else. In nal shift. It is impressively clear.”
practice, nature is never so simple. The high elevation species are of particular What the Future Holds
The Grinnell project offers a rare oppor- interest for several reasons. First, high elevation With the resurvey of Yosemite largely
tunity to do the opposite—look at the effects of areas are those in California that are most likely completed, Lassen National Park is next on the
climate change over time instead of across space. to have experienced the least amount of land use team’s list. Work will begin this spring on this part
PhD candidates Bill Monahan, Juan Parra, and change in the past 100 years. The effects of cli- of the project, which extends from Red Bluff in
Morgan Tingley have been taking the opportunity mate change can therefore be isolated and inves- northern California, east to the Nevada border.
Facing page, from left to right: Jim Patton, professor from Grinnell’s original notes. This page, left: Jim articles. The original Grinnell database consists
emeritus and curator of mammals at the Museum Patton sexes a shadow chipmunk. Right: Emily Ru- of over 13,000 pages of field notes and over 2,000
of Vertebrate Zoology, makes a new friend. Field bige, a Ph. D. student in environmental science and photographs.
specimens from the survey. A map of Lyell Canyon policy management, sifts through pages of journal
FEATURE
by Michelangelo D’Agostino
S tepping into the Valley Life Sciences Building can be like taking a the library along with other resources for students who might be inter-
walk back in geological time. Archaeopteryx—one of the pit stops on ested in gaining an understanding of what Intelligent Design actually
the evolutionary road from birds to dinosaurs—greets the visitor from involves.”
a large glass case, its death throes immortalized in a limestone block. That December, eleven Dover parents filed a lawsuit in federal
Further on, Pteranodon swoops in low over T. Rex, majestically holding court against the school board, alleging that the statement amounted to
sway over the entrance to the UC Museum of Paleontology. an unconstitutional state sanctioning of religion. For six weeks last fall,
A quick trip up three flights of stairs and a more familiar realm Judge John E. Jones III patiently presided over the scientific, philo-
again emerges: long, austere hallways filled with offices and labs and sophical, and legal arguments in what came to be known as Kitzmiller et
research posters. But while the evolutionary trip from the Jurassic to the al. v. Dover Area School District.
present day may have been just as quick and easy from the perspective But while quiet Dover is several time-zones and several states of
of Mother Nature, it only takes a glance at the clippings on the office mind away from “ultra-liberal” Berkeley, the case hit much closer to
door of Kevin Padian, Professor of Integrative Biology and Curator home than many would have expected. Padian wasn’t the only Berkeley
of the Museum of Paleontology, for a reminder that, from the human figure in the trial. Arrayed on the other side were an emeritus Profes-
perspective, the journey has been littered with endless controversy, sor of Law and a former Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory post-doctoral
politicking, and rancor. Articles on the “merits” of teaching different researcher. Though not physically present in Dover or formally involved
viewpoints in science. A Bruce Springsteen quote from the pages of in the trial, their words and actions cast long shadows in its tran-
Esquire: “Dover, PA—they’re not sure about evolution. Here in New scripts. In the cultural landscape of intelligent design, the fault lines
Jersey, we’re countin’ on it.” run through some unexpected places. Like Escher’s drawing of a hand
And perhaps most significant, a small sticker with a drawing sketching a second hand which, in turn, reaches around and sketches
of Charles Darwin that reads “Charles Darwin, 5’11”, 163 lb., has a the first, Berkeley both shapes the culture around it and is a reflection
posse.” Padian, a staunch defender of evolution and president of the of that same culture.
National Center for Science Education (NCSE), a public interest group
that supports the teaching of evolution in public schools, is surely part Darwin’s Golden Bear
of that posse. It was in this capacity that he testified as one of the two Padian is tall and lanky and, from a distance, where his shock
scientific expert witnesses for the plaintiffs in the landmark trial over of grayish hair is less visible, easily mistakable for a graduate student
the teaching of intelligent design that took place this past autumn in half his age. Soft-spoken and deliberate, he weighs his words carefully.
Dover, Pennsylvania. Perhaps he’s learned from experience. He points to countless examples
In October 2004, the Dover Area School Board voted to have of the anti-evolutionist strategy of “quote-mining”: using the out-of-
ninth-grade biology teachers read their students a now infamous one- context words of scientists against them. This soft-spokenness, though,
minute statement. Its intent was to make students “aware of gaps/prob- masks an intensity about science and how it’s presented in the public
lems in Darwin’s theory and of other theories of evolution, including, sphere.
but not limited to, intelligent design.” “Intelligent design,” the students Padian found himself traveling to Dover at the invitation of the
would be told, “is an explanation of the origins of life that differs from plaintiffs’ lawyers. The NCSE and the legal team, consisting of repre-
Darwin’s view. The reference book Of Pandas and People is available in sentatives from Philadelphia firm Pepper Hamilton and the American
Exapt or Die
One of the most powerful scientific weapons in the arsenal of evo-
lutionary biologists is the concept of “exaptation.” As Padian explains
in his trial brief, exaptation is the idea that “a structure that initially
is developed in the service of one function may be modified to
FEATURE
FEATURE
classes that use overtly religious texts such as those from Bob Jones University Press. The introduction of one such
biology text states that “the people who have prepared this book have tried consistently to put the Word of God
first and science second.” The University is fighting the suit, maintaining that it has a right to set such standards and
that the standards apply to everyone equally.
In October, a California couple brought another suit against the UC over “Understanding Evolution”
(evolution.berkeley.edu), a web site meant to serve as a resource for high school biology teachers on the
topic of evolution. Jeanne and Larry Caldwell maintained that the site violates the separation of church and state
by making the statement that religion and science are very different things and that one need not make a “choice”
between the two (the site features a cartoon of a labcoat-clad, fossil-hugging scientist shaking hands with a Bible-
toting priest). By linking to an NCSE site that features quotes from particular religions that state that evolution
is not incompatible with religion, the public UC is also using federal money to promote these particular religious
views over others. The suit was dismissed in March when a federal judge ruled that the couple lacked legal standing
to sue in federal court.
Reprinted by permission of evolution.berkeley.edu
Boalt From Above the Santorum Amendment, a “teach the controversy” amendment to No
Nothing about Johnson’s white hair and grandfatherly demeanor Child Left Behind proposed by Republican Senator Rick Santorum of
suggest that he would spark a national controversy. He sits in his third- Pennsylvania but ultimately dropped in the final bill. Johnson told the
floor Boalt Hall office surrounded by books and papers, the very picture Washington Times that he himself “helped frame the language” of that
of a welcoming, open-minded intellectual. A stuffed gorilla wearing a
suit and smoking a cigar sits on his desk (a gift from some students, While supernatural explanations
he laughs). He smiles and quips that he wouldn’t mind being related may be important, and have merit,
to gorillas; after all, a handful of dust is not necessarily a more noble they are not a part of science.
beginning.
“I considered [Dover] a loser from the start,” Johnson begins. amendment. In addition, Johnson was one of the main architects of the
“Where you have a board writing a statement and telling the teachers to Discovery Institute’s Wedge Document. In that document, he outlined
repeat it to the class, I thought that was a very bad idea.” The jaw drops a strategy that would act as a wedge to split the tree of cultural and
further when he continues: scientific materialism.
Perhaps he’s had a change of heart, and his position truly has
I also don’t think that there is really a theory of intelligent evolved in a more apolitical direction. It’s clear that Johnson genuinely
design at the present time to propose as a comparable alterna-
tive to the Darwinian theory, which is, whatever errors it might believes what he writes and espouses. And it’s hard to doubt that he
contain, a fully worked out scheme. There is no intelligent design has a burning intellectual interest in the fundamentals of evolution and
theory that’s comparable. Working out a positive theory is the job design. But it’s also hard to doubt that he’s helped to further intelligent
of the scientific people that we have affiliated with the movement.
Some of them are quite convinced that it’s doable, but that’s for design in the public realm, whether through his writing, his organiza-
them to prove…No product is ready for competition in the edu- tional skills, or his work with the Discovery Institute. His attitude has
cational world. the flavor of the old Billy Joel tune: “We didn’t start the fire. It was al-
ways burning since the world’s been turning.” But surely Philip Johnson
Throughout the interview, Johnson maintains that his interest in helped to start the fire.
Darwinism is purely intellectual rather than political: “The key question
to me is not what happens in a particular federal district court, but
whether or not that claim is correct.” Politics only hurts this search for
the truth. When President Bush came out in favor of teaching both sides
of the debate, Johnson had mixed feelings. “I’m glad to see the idea that
there’s something to discuss here get further off the ground, but the fact
that it was Bush who said it put the issue into the red state blue state po-
litical mix…I was more dismayed than elated to see the thing surface in
the context of our political divide.” [see page 34 for more of the BSR’s
interview with Johnson]
It’s difficult to tell if Johnson is being completely forthright about Photo by Charlie Emrich
wanting to stay out of politics and the public schools. In the past, It Ain’t Over ‘Til…
Johnson has certainly put considerable effort towards injecting intel- And so the stage was set for Dover. After six weeks of delib-
ligent design into the public realm. In 2002, he told the Berkeley Science eration, Judge Jones delivered a strongly-worded decision, ruling for the
Review that “where controversial subjects like biological evolution are plaintiffs and holding that the Board’s actions had clearly violated the
taught, educators should teach the controversy, preparing students to be separation of church and state. Padian’s testimony featured prominently
informed participants in public debates.” As an example, he pointed to in the decision, as did the words and actions of Johnson and Kenyon,
THE BSR SITS DOWN WITH PHILIP JOHNSON AND KEVIN PADIAN
Professor of Integrative Biology Kevin Padian testified in defense of evolution in Dover. Philip
Johnson, Professor of Law Emeritus at Boalt Hall, is the widely-recognized father of intelligent design.
In the aftermath of the Dover decision, they both sat down to talk with the Berkeley Science Review.
FEATURE
though they were not physically present in the courtroom. “The decision made a lot of things easier for the American public,” he
evidence at trial demonstrates that ID is nothing less than the progeny continues. “He drew the line that scholars and educators asked him
of creationism,” Judge Jones wrote. But he went even further. Asked by to draw. He didn’t muddy the line like the fundamentalists asked him
both sides to address the fundamental question of whether or not intel- to do. For Phil Johnson and the Discovery Institute, the fat lady has
ligent design is science, he wrote: sung…No one who can fog a mirror intellectually can have any more
illusions that this drivel should be taken seriously as science, or even as
While supernatural explanations may be important and social studies.”
have merit, they are not part of science…While we take no posi-
tion on whether such forces exist, they are simply not testable by For his part, Johnson agrees: “I think the fat lady has sung for any
scientific means and therefore cannot qualify as part of the scien- efforts to change the approach in the public schools…the courts are
tific process or as a scientific theory…ID is not science and can- just not going to allow it. They never have. The efforts to change things
not be judged a valid, accepted scientific theory as it has failed to
publish in peer-reviewed journals, engage in research and testing, in the public schools generate more powerful opposition than accom-
and gain acceptance in the scientific community. ID, as noted, is plish anything…I don’t think that means the end of the issue at all.”
grounded in theology, not science. “In some respects,” he later goes on, “I’m almost relieved, and
Science cannot be defined differently for Dover students
than it is defined in the scientific community as an affirmative ac- glad. I think the issue is properly settled. It’s clear to me now that the
tion program…for a view that has been unable to gain a foothold public schools are not going to change their line in my lifetime. That
in the scientific establishment. isn’t to me where the action really is and ought to be.”
Both Defendants and many of the leading proponents of
ID make a bedrock assumption which is utterly false. Their pre- Whether Dover really was the swan song of intelligent design
supposition is that evolutionary theory is antithetical to a belief in remains to be seen. Either way, the decision has dealt a serious blow to
the existence of a supreme being and to religion in general. the cause. The movement that Phil Johnson started may just have run
aground on the rocks of Padian’s testimony. Or rather on the fossils in
For Padian, the decision represents an incredible victory: “Not a the rocks of Padian’s testimony.
single sentence of the judge’s decision would give comfort to the ID
crowd. We don’t see how it could have been any better.” “The judge’s Michelangelo D’Agostino is a graduate student in physics.
FEATURE
tinue to be debated in the public for the plaintiffs. I’m not at all com- philosophy of science… who is not you, and that’s ex-
forum. In the United States, it’s no plaining that he did that. When you And this is something that it takes actly what the Discovery Institute
secret that the overwhelming ma- have members of the school board ordinary people a while to find out, people have done. They’ve demon-
jority of people are unconvinced by saying things like we ought to stand and for good reason, because sci- ized scientists, they’ve demonized
the Darwinian claims. Only about up for Jesus because he died for us, ence is a world of jargon and very the practice of science, they’ve
10 percent of the American pubic that’s really asking for it. Even so, arcane and abstruse knowledge deliberately tried to create a big
is convinced of the fundamental the thing is not what anybody’s mo- that scientists make very little tent of people who disagree with
Darwinian claim that mankind and tive is, but how good the evidence attempt to make palatable and each other on nearly everything,
all other living things on the earth is. The issue over Darwinism in the interesting to ordinary people. We the other creationists, older cre-
were produced by a process of ran- public and university world does could do it, we just don’t place a ationists, fundamentalists, moderate
dom mutation and natural selection not hinge on what the motives are premium on it, and that’s our fault. evangelicals.
as the textbooks say in which God for anybody proposing or oppos-
played no part, the creator played ing the claims of the Darwinian BSR: Why do you think it is that BSR: What’s your personal opin-
no part. The other 90 percent mechanism. evolution gets such a visceral reac- ion on the co-existence of science
would be divided between outright tion from people? A lot of things and religion in general? It seems
creationists…and then those who BSR: Do you think that you scien- about cosmology and astrophysics like there must be another group
say there was a process of evolu- tists and philosophers are going to seem like they could similarly shake of religious people in this country
tion…which was God-guided. keep trying to work on this issue? people’s worldviews. who wouldn’t call themselves
fundamentalists who don’t have a
KP: Because they don’t under- problem with science…
When you have members of the school stand it. They don’t understand
the first thing about relativity. If
board saying things like we ought to stand you tell them that the universe is
KP Fundamentalists can’t co-exist
with anyone. I mean that’s just it.
up for Jesus because he died for us, that’s 15 billion years old they go “Oh” They can’t coexist with anyone.
really asking for it. - Johnson and they don’t have to deal with it Particularly not other fundamental-
anymore. And in fact there are a lot ists. To them, everyone is an enemy.
of physicists who as you know are
BSR: What do you think about the PJ:Yes. They do. In fact, I get email very much engaged in cosmological BSR: It seems like on both sides
organizations and think tanks that every week from graduate students. metaphysical questions, many of there’s a little bit of demonizing
are pushing this as a political issue which have completely non-scien- of the other side. Do you think
rather than as an intellectual issue? BSR: Would you say that Berkeley tific dimensions that they take very scientists share some of the blame
Do you think the debate should has been an open and hospitable seriously. But the problem here is at all?
just stay within universities and the place in your experience? that once we start talking about
academe? how life changes through time KP: Well, scientists really don’t go
PJ:: They put up with me all these it’s getting closer to everybody’s out in the world talking about how
PJ:: Well that’s always the way I had years. I would say Berkeley has backyard. And people don’t want stupid religion is. It isn’t that they
thought of it. Now, I have to confess been open in my experience, as a to hear that they are animals, that couldn’t, it’s just that they don’t.
to some guilt here myself, because I whole. Some people at Berkeley are they are mammals. They don’t want When pressed, you’ll get people
have talked about the moral conse- not. People whose livelihood is all to hear what they share with a like Richard Dawkins, who’ll say
quences or cultural consequences mixed up in conventional evolution gorilla. that it’s just superstition and all of
of Darwinism, and I mean that as a or biology tend to get quite angry the claims it makes for its good
reason for saying, well this is impor- and don’t want anything heard BSR: What does it say about us works and uplifting effects are just
tant, so we have to really be sure about it. I would say the Berkeley as a country that ID has made this balderdash, and he can point to
that what we’re saying is science is campus on the whole…it would headway? evidence for this. This is nothing
really backed by powerful evidence. surprise many people how open it new. And no, I don’t think it’s the
And I would say that the claims for is and has been. Even people who KP: That’s a good question. I think scientists’ fault about that. I think
the creative powers of mutation are quite conventional in their Dar- it’s made this headway because it the scientists are at fault for not
and selection are not backed by winist beliefs themselves will often was carefully crafted as a socio- explaining our disciplines more
powerful evidence. think that it’s a good idea for the political movement. A cultural clearly to the public so that they
students to hear something that movement that wanted to get a can’t be misconstrued. If our level
BSR: Do you think Judge Jones contradicts the official story. So yes, materialist view of life replaced of scientific literacy were higher
overstepped his judicial role? I’m quite approving of Berkeley on by a particular Christian theistic in this country we might not have
the whole. worldview. This is exactly what this problem. But you see, these
PJ:: I would say so, yes. I wouldn’t the Discovery Institute says in people have been working for 85
say that that necessarily means the its wedge document, its mission years so that we don’t even get to
judgement’s going to be reversed. It statement. teach this.
probably doesn’t. He plainly decided
to join the cultural war, the cultural BSR: But in some sense there
battle, and say, “I’m gonna settle this must have been fertile ground for
it…
Science
And Sustainable
Development
by Kevin Moore
The problems facing developing nations are often considered to be purely governmental or policy issues with
no connection to scientific pursuits. But some scientists, including UC Berkeley physicist Marvin Cohen, hope
to change this attitude.
Last November, the American Physical Society (APS) and other international organizations convened the
first-ever World Conference on Physics and Sustainable Development. The meeting, held in Durban, South
Africa, brought together 500 researchers from all over the world to discuss the role of the international
physics community in the sustainable development of the world’s poorest areas.
Cohen served as the president of the APS during 2005 and played a central role at the Durban meeting. “All
the physics societies that I’ve had anything to do with over the last few years have been concerned about
developing nations,” Cohen said. “We [the APS] have tried to take a leadership role.”
The goals of the Durban meeting were two-fold. One objective was to clarify the relationship between the hard
sciences and public policy; the other to establish well-defined initiatives to address challenges in sustainable
development. The plan for future action was laid out in a set of resolutions, approved by conference attendees
at the end of the meeting.
It is too soon to tell how or even whether the proposed initiatives will be implemented. “I’m concerned that
there won’t be any action,” Cohen said after the meeting. “What we need is some motivated people to do
something, and I’d hate to see this momentum lost.” Meeting organizers hope that the prominence and
visibility of the meeting will serve as an archetype for other scientific disciplines to consider their role in
sustainable development.
POLICY
Teaching scientists the language of policymakers
by Temina Madon
1859 drawing by architect Thomas U.Walter of the elevation of the Capitol dome.
hat Berkeley student hasn’t at some point felt exiled out here on the western edge of the country, isolated from
W the political conversations taking place in the nation’s capitol? Or frustrated at only hearing the word “academic”
used pejoratively by the media? It doesn’t have to be this way; much of what goes on here is in fact relevant to
society’s larger questions. While the links between academic science and actual policy may sometimes be difficult to perceive,
many people have managed to prosper in both worlds.
Take, for example,Vernon Ehlers, the first physicist to serve in Congress. aware of the lack of scientific input into the national policymaking process.
He began his career at UC Berkeley in the 1960s, where he received his Over time, Ehlers began to venture into politics himself, initially at the
doctorate and later taught in the physics department. While at UC Berkeley, local level, addressing environmental issues in his home town of Grand Rap-
he spent much of his time engaged in nuclear and atomic physics research ids, Michigan. Today, he is a sixth-term member of the House of Representa-
at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, and eventually became close tives (R-MI), where he chairs the Subcommittee on Environment, Technology
friends with the legendary Glenn Seaborg, father of radiochemistry and and Standards of the House Science Committee. His tenure in Congress has
discoverer of some 13 elements. At Berkeley, Ehlers met many researchers been marked by an unwavering commitment to education and research in
concerned by national security policy, nuclearization, and war. He also became science, technology, engineering, and math.
POLICY
the government on some of the most controversial and cutting-edge issues in
science and technology. For example, with the current limitations on federal
support for embryonic stem cell research, the NAS has tried to fill the void
in providing research guidelines in this burgeoning field. Often their work
examines the interfaces between academic research, human welfare, domestic
and foreign policy, and international relations. More than 100 professors at
Berkeley serve on the Academies, providing a means for local scientific exper-
tise to be heard in Washington.
The Academies function through committees and boards, comprised of
the nation’s most respected and established scientists, engineers, and physicians.
Because of the Academies’ intellectual integrity and independence, their recom-
Photo courtesy of Temina Madon
mendations are often acted upon by Congress. Indeed, much of the nation’s
The author, Temina Madon, gets first-hand experience with
health, economic, and foreign policy is driven by these reports. Recent reports science policy as a Congressional Science Fellow with the
that are likely to trigger Congressional legislation include those on economic American Association for the Advancement of Science.
competitiveness and the science workforce, terrorism and bioterrorism, the
health care crisis in developing countries, and childhood obesity. However, other
reports, such as the Academies’ recommendations to change our climate-alter- age of science and technology, often in the context of public health, global
ing ways, have not been greeted with much enthusiasm in the White House. climate change, and poverty.
By staying abreast of the Academies’ latest releases, and by understanding Easier than hunting down the information yourself, try signing up for e-
their content and recommendations, you have an opportunity to influence po- newsletters from scholarly journals, non-governmental organizations like the
litical discussion. An email to key representatives and senators, communicating Union of Concerned Scientists, and think-tank groups like the Kaiser Family
the importance of new findings from the National Academies, gives you a chance Foundation (for news on HIV/AIDS, public health, and other health-related
to frame the arguments presented and influence the policymaking process. policy). Many professional societies, including the American Society for Cell
One difference between academic science and policy is specialization. Biology and the American Chemical Society, now send out “action alerts”
Scientists are only expected to stay up-to-date in a narrow field of discipline, and legislative news of interest to researchers. Of course, you can also find
but to be relevant to the larger community one must keep up with a much interesting science news on blogs and through RSS (Rich Site Summary) feeds;
wider range of issues. A good way to do this is to peruse the front sections of Chris Mooney, author of the partisan book The Republican War on Science, runs
scholarly journals with policy and news sections. Some of the best examples a particularly popular science blog.
are Science, Nature, and Chemical & Engineering News, which cover academic Once you’ve become familiar with the issues, why not put your exper-
research as well as industry and give more time to international news than tise to use advising local or national policymakers? In the process of helping
your average American newspaper. EurekAlert!, a service provided by the pub- politicians to make better science policy decisions, you may also help to se-
lishers of Science, offers online science and technology news organized by cure the future of federally funded science research. And who knows—one
research topic. For news and opinions on how science impacts the developing day you, too, may end up running for office.
world (which is where most humans live), read www.scidev.net or the
World Health Organization’s website. For those with some down time in
front of the computer, listen to audio files from National Public Radio (NPR), TEMINA MADON is a AAAS science and technology policy fellow and graduated from
which are available for free on the web. NPR provides comprehensive cover- Berkeley in 2004.
Another scientist revered for his role in public policy is Joseph Roblat, a nuclear physicist who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2005 for his leadership in
nuclear arms control. Roblat was a Polish-born Jew who left for Great Britain on a physics fellowship just as Nazi Germany began its invasion of Poland. He
later came to the United States to work on the Manhattan Project, believing the Americans’ effort could prevent an out-and-out nuclear war. However, upon
learning of the German’s failed nuclear bomb project, he returned to London to work on civilian research and to raise humanitarian concerns about nuclear
weaponization. Through a series of influential scientific gatherings known as the Pugwash conferences, Roblat would ultimately lead British and American
government officials to embrace nuclear arms control, resulting in the signing of the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty of 1963.
Physicists aren’t the only scientists to have played a role in federal policy-making. Alvin Novick, a distinguished professor of biology at Yale who died just a
year ago, is certainly remembered for his contributions to science and medical research; yet it is his leadership as an AIDS advocate that will remain his legacy.
Dr. Novick became a voice for people with AIDS in the earliest days of the epidemic, not only speaking against uninformed discrimination and stigmatization,
but also directing policymakers to use sound scientific judgment in matters of public health. He pioneered the expansion of needle exchange programs, now
recognized as one of the most effective interventions for IV drug users at risk of HIV.
Get your feet wet by trying a few of the ideas below to determine which aspects of science policy are most interesting to you.
POLICY
Get informed
In addition to the resources listed above, read science policy publications like “Science and Government Report” and “Issues in Science and Technology” or
newspaper science sections like that in the New York Times.
Express yourself
Write letters to scientific journals expressing policy views on news items, recent research articles, or academic politics. For local magazines and papers,
write a letter to the editor or an op-ed piece explaining, for example, how a recent news item such as the Patriot Act impacts researchers or your own
work by limiting international scholars’ access to visas.
Speak with deans and chairs in your department about the issues faced by researchers at your university—from problems with Department of Defense
grants or NIH study sections to issues of ethics and academic honesty, or bans on entire fields of research. Barriers to research at UC Berkeley might
include the cumbersome restrictions placed on federal funding of stem cell research, or the costly regulations required for “dual use” research, such as
the study of the anthrax genome (which, in principle, could wreak havoc in the hands of bioterrorists).
Email or write letters to members of Congress about federal and legislative issues that impact scientists—these letters actually do get read if they’re
not just “form letters.” Encourage colleagues from other institutions to sign on to a letter that you distribute by email—consensus among scientists is
powerful evidence for policy-makers.
Focus, focus
Keep your letters, emails, and solicited commentary to the point and aimed at the appropriate audience. For example, don’t bring up your great arguments
for increasing the National Science Foundation’s funding at the local school board meeting—they would probably rather hear your opinion of teaching
intelligent design in science classrooms.
Be creative
Start a science policy blog or weekly digest for colleagues in your department or field of research, posting relevant news items, grant opportunities, and links
to useful laboratory resources. Encourage faculty, postdocs, and fellow students to comment and participate. Check out the synthetic biology wiki page for
a remarkably successful example at syntheticbiology.org.
Check out some of the public-private partnerships that exist on the edges of your research field, where findings from academia are translated into products
for popular consumption. Good places to find some of these efforts are professional schools—including law schools, medical schools, departments of public
health, and schools of public policy, but here’s a quick list to get you started.
¨ If you’re a microbiologist, find out what the bio-security think tanks are talking about—examples include Stanford’s CISAC, the Center for International
Security and Cooperation, and the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, DC.
¨ If you’re a biophysicist working on viral replication and translation, what are the G8 countries doing to ensure that medicines for HIV/AIDS and other
viral pathogens are available in the developing world? What is the Gates Foundation doing to help alleviate the burdens of infectious disease and poverty
in sub-Saharan Africa?
¨ If you work in database architecture, what is the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a non-profit digital rights group, working on, and what are the current
interests of open source advocates like Larry Lessig or Richard Stallman?
¨ If you work in operations research, how is the expertise from industry being applied to social problems, like the delivery of food and drugs to remote
parts of the developing world?
It may sound strange for a student to spend a summer or a month in the nation’s Capitol, but medical students and residents do it all the time. Interning in a
Senator’s office or federal agency gives you a hands-on feeling for how policy is developed, negotiated, and implemented. Start thinking early about applying
POLICY
for a science policy or science writing fellowship. There are lots of opportunities to consider at each stage of a scientist’s career.
UCDC
Graduate students engaged in doctoral research and Berkeley faculty members are encouraged to contact the UC program in Washington DC for op-
portunities to speak, research, and teach in Washington. One or two advanced doctoral students work in the program as teaching assistants each semester,
while pursuing their own research and taking advantage of resources in the capitol.
Day trip
Participate in professional societies’ lobbying days—whether in DC or in Sacramento.While you may hate your first trip to the Capitol (as I did), you’re likely
to learn how little time and information members of Congress actually have when making decisions with far-reaching consequences.
Policy at home
One of the richest experiences for the scientist interested in policy can be serving on a policy-making committee of the faculty, deans, or department heads
at Berkeley. There are also UC-wide policy committees that draw student members from all UC campuses. These committees function in much the same
way as the committees of the National Academies, the NIH, and the Congress.
Policy fellowships
A complete listing of health policy fellowships, for doctoral students as well as senior researchers, is available at kaiseredu.org/policy_index.asp
Science and technology policy fellowships and sabbatical programs can be more difficult to locate, but here is a sample:
National Academies:
The Christine Mirzayan Science and Technology Policy Graduate
Fellowship
nationalacademies.org/policyfellows
Jefferson Science Fellows and other fellowship programs
nationalacademies.org/fellowships
FIELD TRIP!
OUTREACH
Middle Schoolers learn about biodiversity in the fields of Richmond and beyond.
Multiple choice: A Berkeley graduate stu- In addition to visiting the classroom once a can impact biodiversity through urbanization, pol-
dent conducting a biodiversity survey should be week, graduate student fellows take students on lution and global warming by playing bingo.
doing their research in: a) Borneo, b) an Ecuador- three-day field trips to natural reserves around But we’re not just game show hosts. Our
ian rainforest, c) an overgrown field in Richmond California. affiliation with the Berkeley Natural History
surrounded by 37 giddy seventh graders wielding As one of this year’s graduate student Museums means we can show students the
butterfly nets. Thanks to the Exploring California fellows, I work with Peg Dabel’s seventh grade similarities among the bones in a bat wing, a bird
Biodiversity Project, part of the National Science class and John Eby’s eighth grade class at Adams wing, and a seal flipper by borrowing specimens
Foundation’s GK-12 Program, science graduate Middle School in Richmond. Each week I go into from the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology and
students all over the country are stepping out of the classroom with another graduate student, Joel bringing them into the classroom. Students can
Abraham, and two undergraduates, Natalie Valen- get a close look at a diverse collection of reptiles
cia and Becky Chong. We’ve learned to make our preserved in glass jars, and taxidermied birds and
Anyone who asks a question lessons interactive and to involve every student. mammals, which they can touch if they are brave
about the world is a scientist. Holding a class discussion is hard because there enough. We follow up these lessons with trips to
are always a few kids with all the answers, and a the museums on the Berkeley campus so students
few kids who take this opportunity to tune out. can see how scientists use museum specimens,
the lab and into the schoolyard, teaching young So, we’ve tried a few creative things this year. The often collected many years ago, to answer pres-
students from kindergarten through the 12th kids learned about California’s diverse habitats ent-day questions. Later this semester, we plan
grade about science. The UC Berkeley chapter of by building dioramas. They built sea urchins out to bring live reptiles and invertebrates into the
the project is run through the Berkeley Natural of toothpicks, made cacti from pipe cleaners, classroom for the kids to look at.
History Museums and sends graduate students to and learned that grizzly bears used to roam in Of course, the best place to explore bio-
one middle school and three high schools in the California’s mountains. We played “Jeopardy!” to diversity is outside. After collecting insects and
Bay Area. Graduate student fellows’ tuition, fees, review the differences between birds, reptiles and plants in the yard at Adams Middle School, we
and stipend are provided through the project. mammals. And we taught kids about how humans took the students to the Hastings Reservation, a
BbSsRr
are, and who would win in a fight
between a gecko and a scorpion;
many of the questions got right to
the science.
One student asked if a gecko’s
PHOTOS BY WENDY HANSEN sticky feet get dirty, a question it
BSR staff (above, Jess Porter, below left, Charlie Koven) and the turns out that Wendy spent much
GK12 mentors (above, Joel Abrahom, below Becky Chong and Jen- of her time at Lewis & Clark
nifer Skene) work with students on their science articles.
OUTREACH
elevation. Students
ents
were nervous aboutbout
the ascent—it required
hard work, and it was a
little scary. But with our
encouragement, t, every
student made itt to the
top, where theyy could
all look down on the
oak woodlands and feel
proud of their accom-
plishment.
Anyone who asks “It’s like being on an African safari
(Above) Birdwatch-
a question about the world looking through a pair of binoculars
ing at the Hastings
Reservation. (Left) is a scientist. Through and seeing some water buffalo wreak-
Students catch the GK-12 program, the ing havoc, and then realizing they’re
crickets as part of a middle and high school coming straight towards you.”
biodiversity survey.
students learn that science
is not intimidating or scary if you’ve got a little -Sir Roger Penrose describing how he felt when
self-assurance. During the field trips, the students some of his ideas were incorporated into string
became more confident in their abilities to read theory, March 5, 2006
maps and climb steep hills, certainly, but they also
became more confident about their abilities in
the classroom. The students were always curious,
but now their curiosity is more evident because
they are not afraid to ask questions. Hopefully
their confidence and curiosity will persist, and “When you get a thick milkshake from
they’ll continue to see themselves as scientists McDonald’s, you think that’s cream
long after we leave their classroom. you’re drinking, but actually it’s silica
As for us, as graduate student fellows we nanoparticles.”
Photos by Jennifer Skene
learn how to talk to a new audience about sci-
UC Natural Reserve in Carmel Valley. For three ence. Communicating with the public is a critical
-Chancellor Robert Birgeneau, at Advanced
Light Source colloquium on liquid crystal gels,
days, the students collected plants and insects component of the scientific process—as evi-
March 2, 2006
using the methods they’d learned at Adams. We denced by the many funding agencies that require
expose students to science, and to totally new grant proposals to comment on how proposed
experiences. research will impact and involve the public—and
On the first night of the field trip, we took middle-school students provide an appropriately
the students for a night hike. In a treeless spot challenging audience. Through our weekly trips to
along the dirt road, we convinced everyone to the classroom, we learn how to make scientific “No matter what you think to the
turn off the flashlights and look at the sky. These issues accessible and interesting to everyone. contrary, I am not a large, furless,
city kids had never seen so many stars. Everyone white mouse.”
tried to be quiet, to listen to night noises. “Was JENNIFER SKENE is a graduate student in integrative biology.
that a mountain lion?” No, it was an owl, but -George Whitesides speaking about the ap-
good ears. “Was that a mountain lion?” No. It Want to know more? plicability of model studies for pharmaceutical
was wind in the trees. “What about that one?” Check out: development, January 24, 2006
No. Please keep quiet so everyone can hear. The Exploring California Biodiversity project.
“Man, I could’ve sworn that was a mountain lion.” gk12calbio.berkeley.edu
“Yeah, I bet it was!” “We just heard a mountain
lion!” We gave up on silence, switched on the Through Community Resources for Science, scientists
flashlights, and kept walking. can visit elementary school classrooms in Alameda
The next day, the students were split into County and give hands-on presentations about a variety
teams for a scavenger hunt. First, they learned of science topics.
to use a compass and a transect tape to find a www.crscience.org
topographic map, hidden in the tall grass. Next,
they learned to read the map to discover their
next assignment: they had to climb to the lone
Slow Food
BOOK REVIEW
The Omnivore’s Dilemma: A Natural expectancy will actually be shorter than that Pollan addresses the questions of whether our
History of Four Meals of their parents. plethora of food choices is real or perceived,
by Michael Pollan The book contains thoughtful explorations and whether a single choice can actually affect
Penguin Press: 2006. 464pp. $26.95 of vegetarianism and animal rights, as well as our health or the health of the food chain.
the human costs of the modern food chain. Because the intention is to inform, the account
Reviewed by Kristen DeAngelis Pollan’s demystification of the meat industry is detailed, and very long. The book includes
is powerful, particularly his vivid description an abundance of facts and figures suitable for
W
hat should we eat for dinner? This is of the job of slaughtering 400 cattle per hour. arming any veggie, vegan, or foodie, some
a question fraught with gastronomic Unfortunately, his visceral style can also helpfully repeated at regular intervals. But
anticipation as well as complex global occasionally be overly dramatic, which can other readers may find these discussions too
implications, and one that Michael Pollan be distracting from the ultimately important meticulous, and may choose simply to skim
tackles with gusto in his latest book, The message about the origins of our food. these parts.
Omnivore’s Dilemma: A Natural History of In addition to being informative, The
Four Meals (April 2006). Pollan, author of The Omnivore’s Dilemma is also a compelling read.
Botany of Desire and director of the Knight Pollan organizes his thoughts in a way that is
Program in Science and Environmental logical and fluid, and peppers the description
Journalism at UC Berkeley, uses four of each meal with personal accounts of the
meals to structure a discussion of the true people that bring each one to the table.
cost—personal, economic, social, and Throughout the book, the perspective
environmental—of producing, preparing, shifts between the species’ eye view of evolution
and transporting the food we eat. that was articulated in his previous book, A
The first meal is the fastest food: a Botany of Desire, and that of the industrial food
McDonald’s meal consumed in ten minutes chain we have created. For example, Pollan
at 65 mph in his car. The second and third congratulates corn for inducing humans to
meals are both organic, but one is industrial plant it over half of the arable United States,
organic (a possible oxymoron born of modern while enumerating the multiple uses of this
government organic guidelines) while the other versatile grain: 45 different menu items at
is sustainable organic. He finishes with the McDonald’s are made from corn, and of the
slowest of slow food, a meal that took months 38 ingredients it takes to make a McNugget,
of preparation—hunting, gathering, a full day at least 13 are derived from corn.
in the kitchen—but no cash transaction. Pollan’s stated agenda is solely to inform,
Pollan wonders, “How did we ever get to but this book may well succeed in changing
a point where we need investigative journalists public attitudes towards food. The numerous
to tell us where our food comes from and COVER REPRINTED BY PERMISSION OF facts and revelations—especially the
PENGUIN PRESS
nutritionists to determine the dinner menu?” annotated bibliography, which is gratifying
Part of the reason, he posits, is our “national The Bay Area reader will take unique for the serious reader—have a high impact
eating disorder,” an assortment of carbophobia, pleasure in reading this particular book due factor, and it’s not a stretch to imagine readers
lipophobia, and similar food fads invented by to the local attentions of the author. For changing their food purchasing and eating
industries to distract and confuse consumers. one thing, Berkeley’s myriad food choices— behavior.
The narrative details the construction thanks to our proximity to America’s richest This is a book that should be read by
of the dysfunctional industrial food chain, farmland—provide an ideal starting point for anyone interested in not just eating, but
where “it takes ten calories of fossil fuel this type of exploration. Local mycophiles and understanding the true price of any meal.
energy to deliver one calorie of food energy to their mushroom collecting spots, as well as the As Pollan himself says, “in the end this is
an American plate.” In fact, the food industry Whole Foods on Telegraph and Ashby, play a book about the pleasures of eating, the
burns nearly a fifth of all the petroleum cameo roles in the author’s food adventures. kind of pleasures that are only deepened by
consumed in the United States; more than UC Berkeley scientists also contribute knowing.”
automobiles, more than any other industry. their expertise to the book: Integrative
Pollan also explores the social Biology professor Todd Dawson uses a mass Kristen DeAngelis is a graduate student in
consequences of the modern food chain. For spectrometer to trace the amount of corn the microbiology.
example, he cites a chilling fact: due to the average American consumes and finds that
Want to know more?
ubiquity of high calorie fast food and resulting “when you look at the isotope ratios, we North
Check out michaelpollan.com
epidemic of obesity, today’s children will be Americans look like corn chips with legs.”
the first generation of Americans whose life In exploring the sources of our food,
BERKELEY
science
52 B ERKELEY S CIENCE R EVIEW SPRING 2006 review