You are on page 1of 4

When passions run high, reasoning goes on a sick leave.

How many of us agree to the above adage. I do. My this mail might be like dousing cold
water on the fires raging in some of you to file counter cases.

Whenever I meet a victim, the first thing they ask is, what can we do to put them in the
dock. Which counter cases can I file? It sometimes make me want to scream on the top of
YOURSELF. What keeps the tempers in check is the realization that the reactions of
yours truly were not very different from these people approaching when he was new to
the world of 498a.

But I learnt that "incoming bullet has the right of way", hence first thing I need to do is
duck and let the bullet pass. The great strategist Sun Tzu in his book titled 'The Art of
War' has stated, 'The warrior who runs away from a certain defeat, survives to fight
another day.' Hence, do not worry, if there are certain setbacks, just survive the initial
shocks and you would be fine soon. I am telling you guys from the collective experience
of many a fellow 498aed people.

When yours truly was new to this, his first reaction was to file some counter case at the
earliest. But better sense prevailed (more than that, better counsel prevailed) and the
energies were concentrated on getting AB first and making sure that at least few of the
family members are discharged from this false and frivolous case. Despite the same,
yours truly were looking for ways to file counter cases. His usual pleadings to the counsel
was - despite so many of the clear proofs of the complicity of the family members of his
bitter half in criminal conspiracy and criminal intimidation and the cheating and
dishonesty of the lovely 498a wife, why is he not proceeding against them.

The counsel dug his heels and told me nonchalantly that my out-laws (oops in-laws)
would provide me sufficient grounds to start the proceedings in due course of time. So I
should not hurry up. AB and discharge is the first priority. Challan is second. And then
only, if he is sure the cases are sustainable, he would proceed. In the hearts of heart, I had
come to respect this person. He surname being a Kapoor helped the matters as well and
he became a "Bhaiya" rather than "Vakeel Sa'ab". And soon, I started following his
advise despite some disagreements. In almost all of the cases, I let his wisdom prevail.

And now that there are two cases running against me, I being out on bail, challan filed,
three people discharged, and the matters reaching level-playing field once again, he
finally gave me a go ahead. And to my surprise, he showed me two drafts to choose from.
"When did you prepare these?" I asked. "Long back" was the reply. This man knows his
trade, I marveled.

He has done and taken some commitments with me. These are very natural and ethical
and seemed like conditions of Bail:

1. I won't lie in court in this case or any other case. (Voila!!! I have nothing to hide)
2. I won't ever threaten them of the impending cases (Why would I, in any case?)
3. I won't ever go to her house/ street/ mohalla, even on an invitation.

Enough of singing paigns to my lawyer, now coming back to the counter cases once
again, as per my understanding there are multiple cases which you can file.

Tax Evasion Petition: The most potent, but most under utilized tool by most of us. The
statement of the girl is a noose in their necks. You just need to pull a little. File the Tax
Evasion Petition as soon as you get the list of dowry articles and list of expenses in
marriage. Anything above 10 Lacs and they are doomed. The loss might just be financial
to them, but enough to give you a lot of breathing space. Also it may help you as an
evidence in your defense.

Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 seems to be the favorite of almost all of us, specially ever
since the Judgment of Hon'able S N Dhingra about the same.

But first see your own charge-sheet, have you been booked under DP Act 3/4. The are
some chances that you are not. The reasoning is simple, in most states One year from the
last incident is the time limit for filing DP Act. Now, when in your state one year is the
time limit for filing DP Act, how can you file a counter-case under the same act. I have
seen dozens of FIRs by now. The common ploy in all these FIRs is that the last day when
they allege to have given dowry is more than one year away from the date of filing of the
complaint. This cannot be a chance, they are definitely by design obviously someone had
read his law correctly at some point of time and most other have copied it diligently.

But, thankfully for some of us and woefully for others, this time limit has been set aside
by state amendments in certain states. If you are lucky to be living in one such state
where there is no time limit to file DP Act. See, the FIR/ Complaint closely, is there a
specific allegation that some part of dowry was given in the jurisdiction of the state
where there is no time limit. Only, if you meet these conditions, you can file a counter
case. But to what avail, D/P Act, 1961 is bailable in most of the states. Again State
amendments comes to the rescue of some of us, but very few.

What other cases one want to file:

120A/ B: Criminal Consipracy, What is the evidence that a conspiracy was hatched
against you. Do you have a recording where they are shown hatching a conspiracy? Do
you have some witness who has seen that they were plotting against you and gone ahead
and taken some action?

191: Giving False Evidence

192: Fabricating False Evidence
199: False statement made in declaration which by law is recieved as Evidence
200. Using as true such declaration knowing it to be false
203. Giving false information respecting an offence committed
209. Dishonestly making false claim in Court
211. False charge of offence made with intent to injure

How can the above be done, without Evidence being done in your case.

321. Voluntarily causing hurt

Prove the same without being discharged. Can you?

378. Theft
380. Theft in dwelling house, etc

Did you institute the complaint, before she lodged a complaint, otherwise your complaint
is a counter blast

403: Dishonest misappropriation of property

405: Criminal breach of trust

Again did you institute the complaint, before she lodged a complaint, otherwise your
complaint is a counter blast

499: Defamation
500: Punishment for Defamation:

Again valid only when you are discharged, though the application may lie before you get
discharged too, but no proceedings would be allowed.

503: Criminal Intimidation

504: Intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of the peace

What are the proofs for the same, any previous litigation? Or is it just a counter blast.

182: Giving False information to public servant:

On discharge naturally.

Then there are other cases, which might apply in very particular cases, and can be 307/
323/ 377 etc., but without basis and unsubstantiated, it does not appeal to my sensibilities.



Hence my dear friends, let's not try to bring cart before the horse or try to cross the bridge
before we come to it. First priority should be to get AB/ Regular Bail for all family
members. Then wait for challan/ charge-sheet and then till you get a chance to file other

One thing which I have noticed that at the start of the case against us, we are all fired up
to file a counter case. And once the case ends and we win, what do we do? How many of
us know of people filing 499/ 500 or 182 or any such other case. How many of us have
given press release to stop other bitter-halves from filing false and frivolous cases?

How many of us have written to the DGP of our state citing the circular of Delhi Police
and SC Judgment of Joginder Singh with a request to give similar direction in our state.
How many of us have filed RTI to get data from the government? I am sure to such
people, the statement of Jai is intended to (To whom I must apologize, as I myself got
carried away). If you are not happy with the state of affairs, it is time to get started and do
something to change it. Not by violent or un-lawful means but within the statutes of law
and gentle persuasion.

Are not we the same people, who did not vote and now complain of having a good-for-
nothing government? If yes, let's keep mum and let things be as they are. We have no
right to object, comment or criticize the government if we have not fulfilled our duty of
voting. And we should not build air-castles, if we have no intention of taking things to
there logical end.

The strength of the man is not in his words but in his actions. If you have it in you, get
started, help others, file a PIL, an RTI, shoot letters to every possible place and educate
people about menace. Your time would come to get even.