Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
JOSEPH H ZERNIK
Petitioner CASE No 1:09-cv-00805
vs
KENNETH MELSON ET AL
Respondants
-1-
Joseph Zernik
1853 Foothill Blvd
LV, CA 91750
Tel: (310) 435 9107
Fax: (801) 998 0917
jz12345@earthlink.net
Pro Se Interested Party
______________________
JOSEPH H ZERNIK
PRO SE INTERESTED PARTY
-2-
Joseph Zernik
1853 Foothill Blvd
LV, CA 91750
Tel: (310) 435 9107
Fax: (801) 998 0917
jz12345@earthlink.net
Pro Se Interested Party
______________________
JOSEPH H ZERNIK
PRO SE INTERESTED PARTY
-3-
PRO SE PETITIONER in Zernik v Melson et al, U.S. Court, District of Columbia, who is
also Interested Party, case of Borrower Parsley, U.S. Court, Southern District of Texas, and
who is also requesting designation as Interested Party in case of Borrower Hill, U.S. Court,
Western District of Pennsylvania, hereby files1 Notice of Support Records #2.
///
I.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Alternative Cover Pages …………………………… 1-3
I. TOC …………………………… 4
II. List of Exhibits …….………..…………… 5
III. Request for Lenience by Pro Se Filer …………………………… 5
IV. Request for Judicial Notice …….………..……………. 6
V. Significance of the Records Noticed Herein …….………..……………. 7
VI. Statement of Verification …….………..……………. 15
VII. Proposed Orders …….………..…………… 17
VIII. Exhibits …….………..……………. 18
///
///
II.
1
Copy is concomitantly filed with TARP Oversight Board, and with TARP Inspector General, as a
request for urgent investigation into matters related to TARP and the Bailout.
Copy is concurrently filed with Lawrence Summer, Director, U.S. President National Economic
Council
Copy is concurrently filed with Paul Volker, Chairman, U.S. President Economic Recovery Advisory
Board, as request for investigation of the allegation that widespread corruption in LA County,
California, involving Countrywide, gave rise, at least in part, to the sub-prime crisis.
Copy is concurrently filed with Carol E. Dinkins., Chairwoman, U.S. President Privacy and Civil
Liberties Advisory Board, as a request for investigation of alleged widespread corruption and civil
rights and human rights violation of historic proportions in LA County, California.
Copies are concomitantly filed with U.S. Congress, as a request for urgent hearings on underlying
matters.
Copy is concomitantly filed with the Israeli Embassy in Washington DC, with request for monitoring
and protection of the rights of dual citizen, Joseph Zernik, per Universal Declaration of Human
Rights, ratified International Law.
-4-
LIST OF EXHIBITS IN CURRENT NOTICE
EXHIBIT 1. 07-12-07- Grant Deed filed for court approval in ex parte appearance on
December 07, 2007, and again in a court order of the same date.
EXHIBIT 2. 07-12-17-Gran Deed filed in the office of the Registrar/Recorder of LA
County as part of purported conveyance of title on the property of Joseph
Zernik.
EXHIBIT 3. James J. Wedick Resume
EXHIBIT 4. 09-01-29 Memorandum Opinion by Veteran FBI Agent James Wedick.
EXHIBIT 5. 09-05-15 Memorandum of Records by Veteran FBI Agent James Wedick.
///
///
III.
REQUEST FOR LENIENCE BY PRO SE FILER
While I make substantial efforts to comply with court procedures, and study
applicable law, I request special lenience as a pro se filer:
A document filed pro se is “to be liberally construed,” Estelle, 429 U. S., at
106, and “a pro se complaint, however inartfully pleaded, must be held to less
stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers,” ibid. (internal
quotation marks omitted). Cf. Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 8(f) (“All pleadings shall be
so construed as to do substantial justice”). (Erickson v Pardus et al, 2007)
In particular, I am unqualified in assessing the validity of legal theories. I ask the
Honorable Court to ignore any irrelevant or erroneous legal theory I claim, and do take into
consideration the facts and the claims themselves, and if they can support some other valid
theory, assign such legal theory to them, and review them pursuant to such valid legal theory
(Haddock v Cal Board of Dental Examiner, 1985).
The Honorable Court is requested to entirely disregard my comments, explanations,
or legal arguments pertaining to such papers, when my writings appear to be of the nature of
legal theories, or legal arguments, and are deemed erroneous, or irrelevant.
If it pleases the Honorable Court, let the Honorable Court act of its own volition
whenever permitted to do so by law:
-5-
a. To initiate action pursuant to the Code of Conduct of U.S. Judges, Canon 3B(3):
(3) A judge should initiate appropriate action when the judge becomes
aware of reliable evidence indicating the likelihood of unprofessional
conduct by a judge or a lawyer.
b. To act pursuant to Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 8(f) “to do substantial justice” for
Plaintiffs who claim to have been inflicted substantial harms by the Los Angeles
justice system.
Dated: May 17, 2009 Respectfully submitted, by:
________________________
JOSEPH H ZERNIK
PRO SE PETITIONER
///
///
IV.
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
I request that the Honorable Courts take Judicial Notice of the following
incontrovertible facts regarding records in Notice of Support Records #2 as follows:
EXHIBIT 1. 07-12-07- Grant Deed filed for court approval in ex parte appearance on
December 07, 2007, and again in a court order of the same date.
Judicial Notice is requested of the facts listed above – that such record was
first filed in an ex parte application by Att David Pasternak for court orders
on December 7, 2007, in Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) at the LA Superior
Court, and later on the same day it was again filed, as part of a court order,
regardless of the validity of any of these courts records, procedures, and
orders.
-6-
EXHIBIT 2. 07-12-17-Gran Deed filed in the office of the Registrar/Recorder of LA
County as part of purported conveyance of title on the property of Joseph
Zernik.
Judicial Notice is requested of the facts listed above – that such record was
filed in the office of the Registrar/Recorder of LA County on or about
December 17, 2007, by Att David Pasternak on behalf of the LA Superior
Court, regardless of the validity, or lack thereof, of any of these records and
procedures.
///
Dated: May 16, 2009 Respectfully submitted, by:
________________________
JOSEPH H ZERNIK
PRO SE PETITIONER
///
///
V.
SIGNIFICANCE OF RECORDS NOTICED HEREIN
///
A. Veteran FBI Agent and fraud expert James Wedick is a highly decorated fraud
expert, who had been part of some of the most visible operations of the FBI during
his years in service.
In reviewing the Memorandum Opinion by Mr James Wedick, one must not fail to
recognize the prominent position Mr Wedick has established in his profession. I approached
such prominent expert not because of the difficulty in deciphering the alleged fraud in the
records generated by Att David Pasternak. I believe that the fraud in the records noticed
herein can be reviewed and decided even by “a lay-person of the jury”. I approached such
-7-
prominent fraud expert only because of the sensitive nature of the opinion sought – against
the conduct of a prominent Los Angeles attorney, who was acting on behalf of the Los
Angeles Superior Court.
///
B. Att David Pasternak, former President of the LA County Bar Association, and
former President of the “House of Justice” – Bet Tzedek is a prominent LA
attorney, who was purportedly appointed Receiver by Court Order in Samaan v
Zernik (SC087400).
In reviewing instant case and the records in instant notice, one must not fail to
recognize the prominent positions Att David Pasternak held in the Justice System of LA
County. Att Pasternak is a former President of the LA County Bar Association, and also
former President of the “House of Justice”- Bet Tzedek, a prominent legal charity
organization in Los Angeles, where some of the largest law firms in Los Angeles are
represented on the Board of Directors. Moreover, one must not fail to recognize that he
engaged in such conduct as a “Receiver” purportedly appointed by Court Order by Judge
John Segal.
Therefore, such conduct as alleged in the opinion letter of Mr James Wedick lends
support to Petitioner’s allegations of widespread corruption of the LA Superior Court.
///
C. Mr Wedick was first provided with the records shows here alone, and then, at his
request with a full volume (~500 pages) of records (Exhibits Volume V) regarding
the conduct of Att David Pasternak.
When I first approached Mr Wedick I provided him only with the records noticed
herein, since I believed and still believe that such records in and of themselves are sufficient
to determine that Att David Pasternak engaged in fraudulent conveyance of title on behalf of
the Los Angeles Superior Court. However, Mr Wedick, who originally ridiculed me by
phone for the suggestion that I had evidence of real estate fraud perpetrated on behalf of the
Los Angeles Superior Court, changed his mind a few days later. At that time he demanded
-8-
that I provide him with additional records as the foundation of the records noticed herein.
At that time I provided him with a volume of about 500 pages, titled “Exhibits
Volume V”, dedicated exclusively to records pertaining to the conduct of Att David
Pasternak. That volume of records will be separately noticed to the Honorable Courts.
///
D. Exactly the same records were filed with both the office of Steven Goldman, Chief of
the White Collar Squadron, FBI, Los Angeles, and the Mr Michael Wilner,
Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney Office, Los Angeles.
The petition filed in U.S. Court, District of Columbia for a Writ of Mandate, to
compel U.S. Officer to perform his duties alleged fraud in statement issued by Respondents
who are Mr Kenneth Kaiser, Assistant Director of FBI for Criminal Investigations, FBI, Mr
Kenneth Melson, Director of U.S. Department of Justice, and Dept of Justice. Such
statements were issued in responses to Congressional Inquiries by the Honorable Diane
Watson, Congresswoman, and the Honorable Dianne Feinstein, Senator, constituted fraud
and deceit by U.S. Officers on the U.S. Congress.
In reviewing such Petition, one must not fail to realize that exactly the same records
that were provided to Mr Wedick were also filed with the FBI – the office of Steven
Goldman, Chief of the White Collar Crime Squadron, Los Angeles, and the office of
Michael Wilner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney Office, Los Angeles a few months
prior to the date that the respective U.S. Officers issued their responses to U.S. Congress.
Such records were filed as a specific complaint against Att David Pasternak, and voluminous
as they may appear, were only a fraction of the total records provided by Petitioner in
support of his complaints of corruption in both Countrywide and the Los Angeles Superior
Court..
///
E. In reviewing such records a reasonable person is likely to wonder why it would be
necessary at all, for a “Receiver” appointed by purported by Order of the Los
Angeles Superior Court to engage in such alleged frauds.
-9-
Given that the claims I make initially sound unbelievable, I feel it is necessary to
address such question through brief review of events of August through December 2007. In
reviewing such events it should be noted that no Writ of Execution was ever noticed by Att
David Pasternak, was ever found in careful review of the paper court file, was ever noted in
careful review of the Register of Actions in Sustain, and was never found in careful review
of the files in the office of LA County Registrar Recorder.
///
///
F. Att David Pasternak was purportedly appointed “Receiver” based on purported
Summary Judgment that was procured through alleged fraud by collusion of
Countrywide and Judge Jacqueline Connor.
Some of the alleged Countrywide fraud records in litigation of Samaan v Zernik
(SC087400) will be separately noticed. The volume of the alleged fraud records is too high,
and only representative records will be noticed. The fraud by Countrywide was in alleged
collusion with fraud and perversion of justice by Judge Jacqueline Connor – best
remembered for her performance in derailing the First Rampart Trial (2000). In the Petition
(Doc #1-2)2,3 this collusion was represented by Exhibit #4 (pp 19-24)4, Minute Order by
Judge Jacqueline Connor, that in paper court file is given with a date of entry of September
10, 2007, while in electronic Court file is given with a date of entry of September 11, 2007.
The latter date is a day later than the day that Judge Connor was disqualified for a cause.
Furthermore, as evidenced by the Transcript for September 10, 2007, (to be separately
noticed), the minute order records a proceeding that never took place in reality, but instead is
2
All records designated herein (Doc #xx) are in reference to Pacer Docket of Zernik v Melson at al.
– U.S. Court, DC, Case No 1:2009cv00805.
3
URLs are provided for the benefit of readers who may not have access to Pacer:
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-us-dist-ct-dc-zernik-v-melson-et-al-09-05-01-doc-001-1-petition.pdf
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-us-dist-ct-dc-zernik-v-melson-et-al-09-05-01-doc-001-2-peition-exhibits.pdf
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-us-dist-ct-dc-zernik-v-melson-et-al-09-05-01-doc-001-3-petition-civil-cover-sheet.pdf
4
All page numbers designated herein (p xx) are in reference to the page numbers appearing in the
Pacer records headers (blue security imprints).
-10-
entirely fictitious. The same Minute Order also recorded a ruling that was never ruled – that
there was no fraud in Countrywide records. Finally, the minute order was entered with no
adequate notice and service, following the habit of judges of the LA Superior Court to waive
the rights of some or all parties to notice and service of court orders. The minute order was
noticed only to Plaintiff, as indicated in the minute order itself.
///
G. Att David Pasternak was purportedly appointed “Receiver” based on purported
August 9, 2007 Judgment by Court Pursuant to Cal Code Civ Proc §437 c that is
alleged as the foundation for further frauds by Judges Jacqueline Connor, John
Segal, and Terry Friedman.
The Judgment by Court pursuant to Cal Code Civ Proc §437 c (Doc #1-2, Exhibit 2,
pp6-7) is an alleged fraud in and of itself, and part of a larger fraud by the Los Angeles
Superior Court – for the past 25 years there is no Book of Judgment in the court, and
therefore , the entry of judgment became vague and ambiguous to a degree that is alleged in
violation of Due Process Rights. In fact, in the past year the Clerk of the Court has refused
repeated requests to certify the August 9, 2007 Judgment by Court as a valid, effectual
Judgment of the California Superior Court.
///
H. Att David Pasternak’s purported appointment as “Receiver” was procured through
fraud: November 9, 2007 Motion for an Order Appointing David Pasternak
Receiver, at 4-days notice, filed on behalf of Plaintiff in Samaan v Zernik by Att
Mohammad Keshavarzi (Sheppard Mullin).
The above referenced motion is alleged as a fraud in and of itself (Doc #1-2, Exhibit
5, pp25-191),5 for a number of reasons, including, but not limited to the following:
The motion purportedly asked for the appointment of a receiver for the execution of a
5
Please notice that the divider page for Exhibit 5 was misplaced in scanning into Pacer, and now
erroneously appears as p50, errata will be separately noticed.
-11-
judgment. In such motion, Att Mohammad Keshavarzi stated in declaration under penalty of
perjury (Doc #1-2, Exhibit 5, p67, ¶2) that Exhibit #1 to such motion for an order
appointing receiver was the Judgment by Court Pursuant to Cal Code Civ Proc §437c,
referenced above. However, under Exhibit #1 to such motion (Doc #1-2, Exhibit 5, pp70-
73), a record that is different than the Judgment by Court Pursuant to Cal Code Civ Proc
§437c was inserted. Moreover, in open court, Att Keshavarzi made is a point that he did so
intentionally (Transcripts to be separately noticed).
///
I. Att David Pasternak’s purported appointment as “Receiver” was based on a
November 9, 2007 Order Appointing David Pasternak Receiver, by Judge John
Segal, which is alleged as fraud in and of itself.
The Order referenced above (Doc #1-2, Exhibit 6, pp192-198), purportedly
appointing Att David Pasternak “Receiver”, is alleged as a fraud in and of itself, for reasons
including, but not limited, to the following:
1) Although in open court Att Mohammad Keshavarzi and Judge John Segal made
statements to the effect that the appointment was for execution of a judgment, the
November 9, 2007 Order failed to incorporate the judgment, and the motion, as stated
above, included a record that was different than the judgment. a fact that was
discussed in detail in open court on November 9, 2007, and therefore, Judge John
Segal was fully informed of the alleged fraud in the motion.
2) Although in open court Att Mohammad Keshavarzi and Judge John Segal made
statements to the effect that the appointment was for execution of a judgment for
Specific Performance of a Real Property Purchase Contract, the November 9, 2007
Order failed to incorporate the said Contract.
3) Although in open court Att Mohammad Keshavarzi and Judge John Segal made
statements to the effect that the appointment was for execution of a judgment, the
November 9, 2007 Order failed to reference the appropriate section of the California
Code as the foundation for the legal authority of Att Pasternak as “Receiver”. In fact,
-12-
it failed to provide any legal foundation in the code at all.
4) Although in open court Att Mohammad Keshavarzi and Judge John Segal made
statements to the effect that the appointment was for execution of a judgment, and
California Code requires distribution of funds within 30 days from the date of sale of
Real Property by the court, the November 9, 2007 Order explicitly stated it was
empowering Att Pasternak to hold the moneys in bank accounts (Doc #1-2, Exh 6,
p195, ¶6), and issue monthly statements (Doc #1-2, Exh 6, p195, ¶4), while it failed
to explicitly state that he had to ever distribute the funds to Defendant in that action,
Joseph Zernik.
///
J. The Grant Deeds by Att David Pasternak, noticed hereby, are also inexplicable
unless through collusion, either by omission or by commission, by Notary Public
Lisa Kalaydjian, who was and is employed by Att David Pasternak.
The existence of the two records that are the Grant Deeds that are noticed hereby, are
inexplicable unless by collusion of Notary Public Lisa Kalaydjian. I therefore requested to
inspect and to copy the respective entries from her journal, a request that led to a threat of
physical violence against me by Att David Pasternak (to be separately noticed).
///
K. The Grant Deed noticed herein, was filed on or about December 17, 2007 in the
office of LA County Registrar/Recorder, while the “file” was held by Judge Terry
Friedman.
The second of the two Grant Deeds noticed herein was filed by Att David Pasternak
in the office of LA County Registrar/Recorder, while the “file” was held by Judge Terry
Friedman. However, Judge Friedman had never been issued an Assignment Order (just like
Judge John Segal before him), and the Clerk of the Court has refused repeated written
requests (to be separately noticed) to certify the case as a valid case of the California
Superior Court, and Terry Friedman as a duly assigned judge in such case.
///
-13-
L. The Grant Deeds noticed herein are not an isolated case, many similar Grant Deeds
by Att David Pasternak were found upon search in the office of LA County
Registrar/Recorder.
In complaints to the FBI and U.S. Dept of Justice it was alleged that the frauds in
Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) were not an isolated case. On the contrary, they were claimed
to be reflection of widespread public corruption in LA County – for lack of better term
named – “The Enterprise Track of the Court”. Many similar Grant Deeds were since then
identified, issued by Att David Pasternak, in search in the office of LA County Registrar/
Recorder.
Of unique significance is the case of Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737), where it is
alleged that Judge John Segal and Att David Pasternak engaged in an almost identical real
estate fraud (to be separately noticed).
In general it is alleged that the only unique feature of Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) is
the meticulous documentation of the various frauds.
///
M. The filing on December 17, 2007 of Grant Deed issued by David Pasternak on my
property is alleged to reflect conditions at the office of LA County
Registrar/Recorder that are inductive to real estate frauds.
Rough visual inspection makes it evident that the Grant Deed filed on December 17,
2007 in the office of LA County Registrar/Recorder was an altered instrument. It was
altered in a manner that makes it impossible to ascertain what instrument the Notary Public
had before her when she signed her acknowledgement. When I called to inquire on the
subject, I was told by representative of the office that the office of LA County Registrar
Recorder accepted such records which were whited-out and altered. The petition alleged that
conditions in the office of LA County Registrar/Recorder were inductive to real estate
frauds.
///
N. LA County was routinely listed in FBI reports as leading the country in real estate
-14-
and mortgage frauds even before the “sub-prime crisis” was noticed. The petition
alleges that conduct of Countrywide and judges of the LA County Court, as well as
the office of LA County Registrar/Recorder are likely to have contributed to that
state of affairs.
LA County was listed in FBI reports, even before the ”Sub Prime Crisis” was noticed,
as “… the epicenter of an epidemic of real estate and mortgage frauds”. The petition
alleges that widespread public corruption among judges of the LA Superior Court,
racketeering by Countrywide, and conditions at the Office of LA County Registrar/Recorder,
combined with the cover-up and patronizing of such corruption by Respondents who are FBI
and U.S. Dept of Justice, were all contributing factors to such state of affairs.
///
Dated: May 17, 2009 Respectfully submitted, by:
BY:_________________
JOSEPH H ZERNIK
PRO SE PETITIONER
Joseph Zernik
1853 Foothill Blvd
LV, CA 91750
Tel: (310) 435 9107
Fax: (801) 998 0917
jz12345@earthlink.net
///
///
VI.
STATEMENT OF VERIFICATAION
_____________________
JOSEPH ZERNIK
pro se Plaintiff
-16-
VII.
PROPOSED ORDER
-17-
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
____ Denied
SO IT IS ORDERED!
_________________________
-18-
VIII.
EXHIBITS
EXHIBITS
-19-
EXHIBIT 1
-20-
GRANT DEED #1
This Grant Deed was filed by
Attorney DAVID PASTERNAK on
December 7, 2007.
-
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
Title #: 80701422-77
APN 1/: 4328-0024-023
Nivie Samaan
Grant Deed
The undersigned grantor(s) declare{s):
Documentary transfer tax is $1,889.80
(X) computed on full value of property conveyed, or
( ) computed on full value less of liens and encumbrances remaining at time of sale.
( ) Unincorporated area: () City of Beverly Hills
hereby GRANT(S} to
Nivie Samaan, a married woman, as her sole and separate property
that property in The Oty of Beverly Hills, Los Angeles County, State of California, described as follows:
Lot 252 of Tract 7710, in the Oty of Beverly Hills, County of Los Angeles, State of California, as per Map recorded in
Book B3, Pages 94 and 95 of maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County.
Together with all of Grantor's right, title and interest in and to that certain Oil enc Gas l.ease, executed by and
between Sammy Narens and lylyan Narens, as lessor, and Standard Oil Company of California, as lessee, recorded
September 23, 1964, as Instrument No. 3156, Official Records, Los Angeles COunty, Calitoria
- 3/11 -
./"1 1-
Name
2 'kl
- 4111 -
EXHIBIT 2
-21-
GRANT DEED #2
This Grant Deed was recorded by
Attorney DAVID PASTERNAK on
December 17, 2007.
- 5/11 -
UNITED TITLE COMPANY
WESTLAKE VILLAGE BRANCH
RECORDINGREQUESTEDBY:
Grant Deed
r-----------------~--------~~r~~~
the undersigned grantor(s) declare(s):
Documentary transfer tax is $1,889,80
'~)"
(X) computed on full value of property conveyed, or
( ) computed on full value less of liens and encumbrance 5 r~mainjng at time of sale.
( ) Unincorporated area: ('t".itj of Beverly I-lill\,
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is h erebv acknowledged,
ria~i~T: ~astetna~ as Recel~e~ for Jos~ph v. Zernick pursuant to case number SCOB 400
, hereby GRANT{S) to
Nivie Samaan, a married woman, as her sale and separate property
that property In The City of Bever~,tmls, Los Angeles [01 Inti, State of California, described as follows:
Lot 252 of Tract 7710, in the City of Beverly Hills, County of Los Angeles, State of california, as per Map recorded In
Book 83, Pages 94 and 95 of maps, In the office of the C )ur,ty Recorder of said County.
Together with all of Grantor's right, title and tnterest in a ld to that certain Oil and Gas Lease, executed by and
between Sammy Narens and Lylyan Narens, as lesser, a ld Standard Oil Company of califomia, as Lessee, recorded
September 23, 1964, as Instrument No. 3156, OffiCial Re:ords, Los Angeles County, Catiforia
t
A<'>A
J::.
STAMP IS ON BACK OF LAST PAGE
EXHIBIT 3
-22-
JAMES J. WEDICK
WEDICK & ASSOCIATES
11230 Gold Express Drive, Suite 310 - #0364
Gold River, CA 95670-4484
916.638.3566 (Direct) 916.290.0999 (Fax)
Website: www.fraudspecialists.com Email: jwedick@fraudspecialists.com
www.FBIexpert.com
FBI INVESTIGATIONS; WHITE COLLAR CRIME; FRAUD
Terrorism
After several officials recommended he receive an appointment to head California’s terrorism effort, in 2004, Mr. Wedick
started his own agency and in 2005 he joined the legal team representing two Lodi, California men charged with making
false statements and supporting terrorism. Because Mr. Wedick was convinced the Lodi men were innocent—commenting
the prosecution was based on a poorly done FBI interrogation, lack of corroboration, and a mishandled informant—he
“battled” the government concerning his expected testimony as an expert that was reported as a “cover” story in the LA
Times Sunday Magazine, in May 2006, and featured in a PBS FRONTLINE documentary titled, “ENEMY WITHIN,” that aired
October 2006. He also secured juror affidavits supporting a misconduct motion and, in 2007—in case dubbed LIBERTY
CITY SEVEN by the Miami media—charged the government’s use of an FBI informant who “failed” a polygraph was a
violation of the Attorney General’s Guidelines on the Use of Informants.
From: Investigator/E
Mr. WEDICK also is responsible for prosecuting seventeen [17] local city
council members, land owners, and developers [in the ClovislFresno area] suspected
soliciting/receiving "bribes" in exchange for favorable zoning requests-all in violation
of the federal RICO and mail fraud statutes-and designed three [3] Health Care Fraud
Initiatives responsible for prosecuting three-twenty-four [324] Los Angeles based
medical providers suspected defrauding funds totaling in excess of $228 million from
California's Medicaid Program.
Reviewing the two [2] Grant Deeds, the first reportedly dated December 7,
2007 and the second December 17,2007, Mr. WEDICK opines the very fact two [2]
Grant Deeds exist for one transaction-each containing different information-suggests
on on-going fraud requiring immediate investigation-particularly before any documents
are allowed to be filed with a court and/or funds are disbursed.
With respect Grant Deed #2 dated December 17, 2007, Mr. WEDICK
opines reviewing the document the Notary Public did not witness and failed to attach a
document identifying/appointing Attorney DAVID J. PASTERNAK as an authorized
court receiver for JOSEPH ZERNIK. Additionally, the notation, "DAVID
PASTERNAK for JOSEPH V. ZERNIK pursuant to case number SC087400," is not a
valid substitute for an authorized court order.
SEE ATTACHMENT
California All-Purpose ACknowledgment as of 1/1/08
State of California )
I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is
true and correct.
.,•.: "~~HoKOM
.-.... COMM. #1770388.
1 ~
Signature.__ ~~~=----=:..._~_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
z:" .1 Notary Public,Californla ~
/ / SACRAMENTO COUNTY
~.~.' ! .1y , .•,.,,,rtl, Exp, 9!11Pt. 21, 201 1
_______________________ OPTIONAL _
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the
document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this to another document.
Title #: 80701422-77
APN #: 4328-0024-023
Nivie Samaan
hereby GRANT{S) to
Nivle Samaan, a married woman, as her sole and separate property
that property in The City of Beverly Hills, Los Angeles County, State of California, described as follows:
Lot 252 of Tract 7710, in the Oty of Beverly Hills, County of los Angeles, State of California, as per Map recorded in
Book 83, Pages 94 and 95 of maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County.
Together with all of Grantor's right, title and interest in and to that certain Oil and Gas lease, executed by and
between sammy Narens and Lylyan Narens, as Lessor, and Standard Oil Company of California, as Lessee, recorded
September 23, 1964, as Instrument No. 3156, Official Records, Los Angeles County, Catiforla
~
2J 2;Q
/'
State of ___ ) 1 ~ T ~)(,'r __
County of ,- ft
I'~if' ~~ I~
David J. Pasternak, Receiver
On - ;.:: . 1 - --' before me, (Solely In that capacity)
I "'-- =1 \ J f> .t ,I. 1--\ v_____
a Notary Public,~rsonally appeared :.)
~',"''';,i -J- :- ):.~-.~ . ,)
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of 'r A <> ,0" <> -<> <> cOt <">.<""» C'b <> At"">, (
WITNESS
Signaturf !J
~YU1~ttfVJ\ (\ .
) \ ~ ,
2 'LI
5b. 12/17/2007 FRAUDULENT
GRANT DEED
DEAN C. LOGAN
ACTING
Flegislrar-Recorder/Counly Clerk
Tttle Company
TITLE(S): DEED
~
LEAD
III ~ III III ~
SHEET
Grant Deed
,..-------------:r0;:~\-,-
lhe undersigned grantor(s) dec/are(s): ~ y
Documentary transfer ta:( is $1,889,80
(X) computed on full vaille of property conveyed, or
( ) ccmputed on full value less of liens and enc!.JmbranCE s r~maining at time of sale.
( ) Umllcorporated are,l', (~it:y of Beverly Hi\\~,
that property In The City ofBever~HIIS, Los Angeles [Ollnt'!, State of California, described as follows:
Lot 252 of Trac~ 7710, in the City of Beverly Hills, County of Los Angeles, State of California, as per Map recorded In
Book 83, Pages 94 and 95 of maps, In the office of the C lur,ty Recorder of said County.
Together with all of Grantor's right, title and int,~rest in a 1d to that certain Oil and Gas Lease, executed by and
between Sammy Narens and Lylyan Narens, as Lesser, a ld Standard Oil Company of california, as Lessee, recorded
September 23, 1964, as Instrument No. 3156, Official Re :ords, Los Angeles County, Califoria
--------_.------ -_.-.- -
Date
.
State of
County of Lex:., A"li-c/c ';
On (I ~ .:9 'L:.. 0 '7 teforc r11e,
To: Dr JosephZernik ~ J~
Date: February 5, 200~ ~ CS:.
From: Investigator/Exp~es J. Wedick
SEEATTAOHMENT
California All-Purpose Acknowledgment as of 1/1/08
State of California )
who proved to me the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person ~ whose name ~ is/a¢
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that heJshefthey executed the same in
his/heritTeir authorized capacity (~ and that by hisJherftMeirsignature ~ on the instrument the
person {J?, or the entity upon behalf of which the person (i) acted, executed the instrument
I certify under penalty of pe~ury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is
true and correct.
Signature ~------>
_______________________ OPTIONAL _
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the
document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this to another document.
Signer is Representing: _
GRANT DEED #1
This Grant Deed was filed by
Attorney DAVID PASTERNAK on
December 7, 2007.
- 2/11 -
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
Title #: 80701422-77
APN 1/: 4328-0024-023
Nivie Samaan
Grant Deed
The undersigned grantor(s) declare{s):
Documentary transfer tax is $1,889.80
(X) computed on full value of property conveyed, or
( ) computed on full value less of liens and encumbrances remaining at time of sale.
( ) Unincorporated area: () City of Beverly Hills
hereby GRANT(S} to
Nivie Samaan, a married woman, as her sole and separate property
that property in The Oty of Beverly Hills, Los Angeles County, State of California, described as follows:
Lot 252 of Tract 7710, in the Oty of Beverly Hills, County of Los Angeles, State of California, as per Map recorded in
Book B3, Pages 94 and 95 of maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County.
Together with all of Grantor's right, title and interest in and to that certain Oil enc Gas l.ease, executed by and
between Sammy Narens and lylyan Narens, as lessor, and Standard Oil Company of California, as lessee, recorded
September 23, 1964, as Instrument No. 3156, Official Records, Los Angeles COunty, Calitoria
- 3/11 -
./"1 1-
Name
2 'kl
- 4111 -
GRANT DEED #2
This Grant Deed was recorded by
Attorney DAVID PASTERNAK on
December 17, 2007.
- 5/11 -
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
REGISTRAR-RECORDER/COUNTY CLERK
12400 IMPERIAL HWY. - P.O. BOX 1024, NORWALK, CALIFORNIA 90651-1024
DEAN C. LOGAN
ACTING
Flegislrar-Recorder/Counly Clerk
Tttle Company
TITLE(S): DEED
~
LEAD
III ~ III III ~
SHEET
Grant Deed
,..-------------:r0;:~\-,-
lhe undersigned grantor(s) dec/are(s): ~ y
Documentary transfer ta:( is $1,889,80
(X) computed on full vaille of property conveyed, or
( ) ccmputed on full value less of liens and enc!.JmbranCE s r~maining at time of sale.
( ) Umllcorporated are,l', (~it:y of Beverly Hi\\~,
that property In The City ofBever~HIIS, Los Angeles [Ollnt'!, State of California, described as follows:
Lot 252 of Trac~ 7710, in the City of Beverly Hills, County of Los Angeles, State of California, as per Map recorded In
Book 83, Pages 94 and 95 of maps, In the office of the C lur,ty Recorder of said County.
Together with all of Grantor's right, title and int,~rest in a 1d to that certain Oil and Gas Lease, executed by and
between Sammy Narens and Lylyan Narens, as Lesser, a ld Standard Oil Company of california, as Lessee, recorded
September 23, 1964, as Instrument No. 3156, Official Re :ords, Los Angeles County, Califoria
--------_.------ -_.-.- -
Date
.
State of
County of Lex:., A"li-c/c ';
On (I ~ .:9 'L:.. 0 '7 teforc r11e,