Tab: KPIs Cycle 2

Objective Activity Weight # KPI Measurements Frequency Target Yr 1 (E) Target Yr 2 (F) Target Yr 3 (G) Comments
Quality of Improve student English, Math, Science, ICT, (Arabic) 20.0% 1 Has the level of English improved? G6-9 combined progress against previous April Yearly
English EMSA scores and CA G6-9 EMSA average standardised score increases and CA G6-9 EMSA average standardised score increases and CA G6-9 EMSA average standardised score increases and CA
Learning and academic achievements improvement
targets (specified in KPI 1 Performance and Sliding Scales targets (specified in KPI 1 Performance and Sliding Scales targets (specified in KPI 1 Performance and Sliding Scales See KPI 9 and 10 as well
Student document) document) document)
Outcomes
20.0% 2 Has the level of Maths improved? G6-9 combined progress against previous April Yearly
Maths EMSA scores and CA G6-9 EMSA average standardised score increases and CA G6-9 EMSA average standardised score increases and CA G6-9 EMSA average standardised score increases and CA
targets (specified in KPI 2 Performance and Sliding Scales targets (specified in KPI 2 Performance and Sliding Scales targets (specified in KPI 2 Performance and Sliding Scales See KPI 9 and 10 as well
document) document) document)

20.0% 3 Has the performance in Science, Arabic and ICT improved? G6-9 combined progress against previous April Yearly
Science and Arabic scores and CA; proven G6-9 EMSA average standardised score increases and CA G6-9 EMSA average standardised score increases and CA G6-9 EMSA average standardised score increases and CA
increases in performance for ICT targets for science and Arabic and ICT targets (specified in targets for science and Arabic and ICT targets (specified in targets for science and Arabic and ICT targets (specified in See KPI 9 and 10 as well
KPI 3 Performance and Sliding Scales document) KPI 3 Performance and Sliding Scales document) KPI 3 Performance and Sliding Scales document)

Special educational needs 2.0% 4

IEPs for all relevant students defined and implemented; IEP
Are IEPs established for all individual students with special support team established; plan to support G & T students in
Compliance and improvement rate Yearly
needs? early stages of implementation; professional development for
all teachers completed
75% of identified students show improvements against their
60% of identified students show improvement against their IEP
IEP targets; G&T students are on advanced learning plan and
targets; G&T students have suitable extension work plan
show evidence of being challenged appropriately

Improve student non- Student personal development 1.0% 5 Does the education contribute to the development of healthy, Percentage of positive answers to compliance Yearly 60% of positive answers 70% of positive answers 80% of positive answers COMPLIANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
academic achievements confident and motivated students, well prepared for their future? questionnaire

Extracurricular activities execution 1.0% 6 Are agreed extracurricular activities executed? % of activities executed Yearly 100% of activities executed 100% of activities executed 100% of activities executed COMPLIANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Attendance improvement 1.0% 7 Does the attendance show a steady increase? Compliance on monitoring system and improvement Quarterly 5% improvement over baseline (or 2% improvement over yr 1) 5% improvement over baseline (or 2% improvement over yr 1) 10% improvement over baseline (or above 95%)
rate
Student behavior improvement 1.0% 8 Are student codes of conduct available and are disciplinary Compliance and reporting of number of misbehaviors Yearly 100% compliant , data on misbehaviors reported 100% compliant , data on misbehaviors reported 100% compliant , data on misbehaviors reported
(Code of conduct) actions executed?
Improve Assessment Assessment framework set up 2.0% 9 Has the Operator set up a valid CA framework that is measured Compliance Semi-annually 100% Compliance Framework in place and reliability of measures confirmed. Framework in place and reliability of measures confirmed. COMPLIANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Methodology reliably?
Student improvement assessment 1.0% 10 Has the student improvement framework been applied? Are Percentage of positive answers to compliance Yearly 60% of positive answers 70% of positive answers 80% of positive answers COMPLIANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (for
execution students aware of learning objectives? Is EMSA data on student questionnaire students)
understanding acted upon?
Quality of Improve Quality of Principal professional development 2.0% 11 Has the operator designed a principal professional development Percentage of positive answers to compliance Yearly 60% of positive answers, plan has been executed 70% of positive answers, plan has been executed 80% of positive answers, plan has been executed COMPLIANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Leadership Principals plan design (coaching and plan (coaching and mentoring)? Has the plan been executed? questionnaire
mentoring)
Principal English level improvement 1.0% 12 Has principal English level improved as according to the IELTS Academic score Yearly 90% principals increased their IELTS score by 0.5 points over 90% principals increased their IELTS score by 0.5 points over 90% principals increased their IELTS score by 0.5 points over HISTORICAL DATA TO CHECK
development plan? baseline OR 60% principals reaching 6.5 IELTS score across baseline OR 70% principals reaching 6.5 IELTS score across Yr2 OR 90% principals reaching 6.5 IELTS score across the
the operator's schools the operator's schools operator's schools
School vision and improvement 1.0% 13 Can the principal provide a clearly laid out SIP and evidence its Compliance Yearly Compliant Compliant Compliant COMPLIANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
plan provision (SIP) progress?
Communicate SIP 1.0% 14 Are staff clear on what the school's strategic objectives are and Percentage of positive answers to compliance Yearly 60% of positive answers 70% of positive answers 80% of positive answers COMPLIANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
what their respective roles are to achieve these? questionnaire & execution checked
Classes schedule 1.0% 15 Does class schedule meet ADEC curriculum requirements (in Compliance Yearly Compliant Compliant Compliant
particular Math and English)?
Financial management control 1.0% 16 Does actual spend reflect budgeted costs? % deviation per allocation budget line Yearly Max 10% deviation per allocation budget line Max 10% deviation per allocation budget line Max 5% deviation per allocation budget line
Financial management and SIP 2.0% 17 Has principal aligned school financial management (budget and % alignment with SIP Yearly 80% alignment 80% alignment 90% alignment
alignment (by Sept 30) expenses) with SIP?
Principals training on teacher 1.0% 18 Has principal been trained on teacher evaluation process? Compliance Yearly Compliant Compliant Compliant
evaluation process
Improve Assessment Assessment framework set up and 1.0% 19 Has the operator set-up an adequate principal assessment Compliance Yearly Compliant Compliant Compliant
Methodology application framework? Has it been applied?

Improve School Student data collection 0.5% 20 Are adequate data collection processes in place for the data Percentage of positive answers to compliance Quarterly 60% of positive answers 70% of positive answers 80% of positive answers COMPLIANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Administration requirements? Is the data fed into the SIS system of adequate questionnaire
quality?
Maintenance 0.5% 21 Is overall maintenance satisfactory and were school requirements Compliance Semi-annually Compliant Compliant Compliant IT COULD BE A UNIQUE QUESTIONNAIRE
communicated in time to ADEC to ensure satisfaction? WITH 3 QUESTIONS PER KPI

IT 0.5% 22 Is overall IT service satisfactory and were school requirements Compliance Semi-annually Compliant Compliant Compliant
communicated in time to ADEC to ensure satisfaction?

Procurement 0.5% 23 Is overall procurement satisfactory and were school requirements Compliance Semi-annually Compliant Compliant Compliant
communicated in time to ADEC to ensure satisfaction?

Health and Safety 0.5% 24 Is overall H&S satisfactory and were school requirements Compliance Semi-annually Compliant Compliant Compliant
communicated in time to ADEC/Municipality to ensure
satisfaction?
Meal services 0.5% 25 Is quality of meals satisfactory? Compliance Semi-annually Compliant Compliant Compliant

Transportation services 0.5% 26 Is transportation safe; does it deliver the students in time at Compliance Semi-annually Compliant Compliant Compliant
school?
Text resources provision 0.5% 27 Are text resources supplied to support ADEC curriculum and Compliance Semi-annually Compliant Compliant Compliant
standards? Are they purchased within the first month of the year?

Learning Environment 1.0% 28 Have required school modifications to improve learning Compliance Semi-annually Compliant Compliant Compliant
environment been identified? Does the classroom provide a
positive learning environment atmosphere?
Quality of Quality of Teachers Design of teacher professional 1.0% 29 Has teacher development plan been created? (Course planning; Percentage of positive answers to compliance Yearly 70% of positive answers 70% of positive answers 80% of positive answers COMPLIANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Teaching development plan ADEC curriculum understanding; level of English; etc.) questionnaire

Identification of underperforming
teachers and action plan for
improvement
The quality of educational delivery
Teacher English performance
improvement
1.0% 30 Has a specific action plan been defined for underperforming Improvement against targets Yearly NA NA NA
teachers? Is performance imroving?
4.0% 31 Is the quality of teaching improving the levels of achievements for Lesson quality, use of resources/ICT, use of student Semi-annually At least 50% lessons judged satisfactory At least 60% lessons judged satisfactory At least 70% lessons judged satisfactory MONITORING AGENCY VISIT
students performance to inform planning COMPLIANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
2.0% 32 Has teachers English performance improved? IELTS Academic score improvements Yearly 90% teachers increased their IELTS score by 0.5 points over 90% teachers increased their IELTS score by 0.5 points over 90% teachers increased their IELTS score by 0.5 points over HISTORICAL DATA TO CHECK
Yr1 OR 50% teachers reach score 6.5 (English teachers) - Yr1 OR 60% teachers reach score 6.5 (English teachers) - Yr2 OR 90% teachers reach score 6.5 (English teachers) -
5.5. (Math, Science and ICT teachers) 5.5. (Math, Science and ICT teachers) 5.5. (Math, Science and ICT teachers)

Teacher training on student
assessment methodology (assess,
collect, report)
Provider's staff recruitment and
attendance
Emeritization
Increase of UAE national employees
Improve Assessment Assessment framework set up
Methodology
1.0% 33 Have the teachers understood the student assessment plan and Compliance Yearly Compliant (100% trained) Compliant (100% trained) Compliant (100% trained)
are they assessing adequately?
1.0% 34 Has provider's staff been recruited by Sept 10? Is the overall "on Compliance - 90% attendance rate for all school- Yearly 90% staff attendance including all absenteeism, replacement 90% staff attendance including all absenteeism, replacement 90% staff attendance including all absenteeism, replacement Operator Records as checked by Monitors
the job" target being met? based staff for current school year. of staff and other contingencies. of staff and other contingencies. of staff and other contingencies. and verified by finance.
0.0% 35 Hs the number of UAE national teachers/principals increased Non used in 2020-2011. NA NA NA NA NA
versus baseline?
1.0% 36 Has the operator set-up an adequate teacher assessment Compliance Yearly Compliant Compliant Compliant
framework aligned to ADEC professional standards?

Heritage and Culture Lesson planning incorporating 0.5% 37 Does the lesson planning include references to UAE heritage and Percentage of positive answers to compliance Yearly 70% of positive answers 70% of positive answers 80% of positive answers COMPLIANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (1 to
heritage and culture culture and are students made aware of local and national events? questionnaire students/ 1 to school)

Visible recognition of heritage and 0.5% 38 Evidence that culture, heritage and Arabic language are Compliance Yearly Compliant Compliant Compliant
culture embedded as part of the school program and environment.

Environment and Community
Visible use of bilingual signage in
the school environment
Involvement of parents and
community
0.5% 39 Is the classical Arabic language used in the environment for
school signage? Is Arabic/English used in school displays and
student work displays
0.5% 40 How frequently are parents involved in the school process?
Compliance Yearly Compliant Compliant Compliant
Number of parent events planned over required target Quarterly Meet ADEC per-year-target (at least 2 meetings on curriculum, Meet ADEC per-year-target (at least 2 meetings on curriculum, Meet ADEC per-year-target (at least 3 meetings on curriculum,
1 meeting on student progress and 1 event with partner 1 meeting on student progress and 1 event with partner 2 meetings on student progress and 2 events with partner
involvement in social / student activity) involvement in social / student activity) involvement in social / student activity)

0.5% 41 What is the parent attendance level? Improvement against baseline Yearly Improvement of 70% Improvement of 70% Improvement of 90%
0.5% 42 What is the satisfaction level ? (parents / principal / teachers / Score based on parent survey outcome Yearly >60% >60% >70% SURVEY
students
0.5% 43 Is regular involvement with the community? Compliance Yearly Compliant Compliant Compliant
0.5% 44 Is a student transition plan in place? Compliance Yearly Compliant Compliant Compliant
100.0%

13/05/2011 12:53 ‫ص‬ E:\Appraisal 2011\KPI ENG Cycle 2 -- KPIs Cycle 2 1/1