Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
EW2007 Panel
Tuesday, 3rd April, 2007
• Radio Access Solutions: the 3GPP and the IEEE Technology Family
UMTS Systems
(W-CDMA)
beyond 3G
HSPA >2010
GSM
GPRS EDGE HSPA
Evolution
GERAN IEEE
Evolution 802.16e LTE
(= EDGE-II)
Both WiMax and LTE offer excellent User Data Rates in the order of 10 – 160 Mbps (Bandwidth !).
3 © Nokia Siemens Networks. All rights reserved.
LTE design seems to be superior especially concerning
>>> Commercially Mobility
not Binding <<< and Data Throughput.
Radio Access Solutions at a Glance
The 3GPP Technology Family
GERAN UTRAN
LTE
(GSM/GPRS/EDGE) (W-CDMA/HSPA)
• Large installed base with excellent • HSPA to apply the full power of W- • 3G evolution towards full
large-area coverage CDMA @ reduced network cost broadband multimedia services
• Quick and cost-effective upgrade • User experience comparable to • Significantly reduced network cost
of existing networks DSL in terms throughput & latency • Flat Architecture, fully IP based
• Near-broadband data services with • High capacity, full mobility, high • Flexible bandwidth and spectrum
EDGE Phase II (up to 1 Mbps) data security and QoS usage
• Seamless 2G/3G handover – • Quick and cost-effective upgrade • Full mobility, security, QoS assets
worldwide coverage, global of existing networks
roaming • Seamless 2G/3G/LTE handover
• Seamless 2G/3G handover
4
Clear 3GPP Evolution Path towards LTE, comprehensive 2G/3G/4G interworking, easy upgrade &
© Nokia Siemens Networks. All rights reserved.
re-farming potential, seamless services (handover,
>>> Commercially not Binding <<< roaming), full high-speed mobility.
Radio Access Solutions at a Glance
The IEEE Technology Family
WLAN WiMAX stationary WiMAX mobile
(IEEE 802.11) (IEEE 802.16d) (IEEE 802.16e)
• Solution for specific markets • Fixed or mobile network operators • Fixed or mobile network operators
including municipal networks and • Optimized wireless-DSL services • Optimized wireless-DSL services
backhauling in combination with (Voice + data) (Voice + data)
other radio access technologies,
e.g. WiMAX backhaul for WLAN • Support of charging/billing typical • Support of charging/billing typical
or WLAN backhaul for GSM for DSL (e.g. user classes, for DSL (e.g. user classes,
volume/flat-rate packages) volume/flat-rate packages)
• Hotspot business solution to
complement MNO’s offering • High capacity for stationary use • High capacity; Limited mobility
• High capacity for stationary use • Selective QoS • Selective QoS
Large capacity High speed data rates High speed data rates
for metro networks for fixed wireless access with limited mobility
5
Modular stand-alone Standards allowing for easy combinations and
© Nokia Siemens Networks. All rights reserved.
offering high performance.
>>> Commercially not Binding <<<
LTE vs. WiMax Comparison (Radio Perspective)
WiMax 802.16e LTE Comments
Flat, IP based; Very Flat, IP based Both technologies with
Network Architecture significantly reduced number of
BS + ASN GW eNodeB + aGW nodes compared to 2G/3G.
Services Packet Data, VoIP Packet Data, VoIP
Full 3GPP Mobility with
Mobility Mobile IP with targeted Target up to 350 km/h; LTE is fully embedded in the
Mobility < 120 km/h 2G/3G Handover and 3GPP world incl. interRAT HO.
Global Roaming
Scalable OFDMA DL: OFDMA, SC-FDMA reduces PAPR by
Access technology in UL & DL ~5 dB UL improvements !!!
UL: SC-FDMA
1.25, 3.5, 5, 7, 8.75, 10, 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10,
Channel BW 14, 15, 20, 28 MHz 15, 20 MHz
Both very flexible
FFT-Size and 128 – 2048; dF variable; 128- 2048; Large dF required against
Subcarrier Spacing 7- 20 kHz typically 10 kHz fixed dF = 15 kHz Doppler => higher velocity
Both designed to combat
Flexible 1 / 32, ….,1 / 4; Short (5 µs) or Long CP Multipath
Cyclic Prefix CP typical 1 / 8 (17 µs) Fading in different
Environments
Licensed & unlicensed, Licensed, LTE available at preferred low
Spectrum Frequency Bands Coverage
2.3, 2.5, 3.5 & 5.8 GHz IMT-2000 Bands Advantage
TDD + FDD FDD + TDD TDD requires Synchronization,
Duplex Mode FDD can be asynchronous.
TDD focus FDD focus
Framing, TTI 2, …, 20 ms; fixed 2*0.5 ms slots TTI determines the Latency /
5 ms focus = 1 ms sub-frames PING
Modulation & Coding BPSK, …, 64-QAM; QPSK, …, 64-QAM;
CC + CTC (+BTC+LDPC) CC + CTC
6 © Nokia Siemens Networks. All rights reserved.
>>> Commercially not Binding <<<
LTE vs. WiMax Comparison (Radio Perspective)
WiMax LTE Comments
BS: 1, 2, 4 ; MS: 1, 2 eNodeB: 1, 2, 4 ; UE: 2 LTE working assumption is 2
MIMO, # Antennas
Closed + open Loop Closed + open Loop DL Antennas per UE
MIMO Modes Diversity + Spatial Multi. Diversity + Spatial Multi.
• Rather similar Peak Data Rates for HSPA evolution and WiMAX
• LTE provides outstanding Data Rates beyond 150 Mbps in 2 x 20 MHz Bandwidth
due to less overhead
• WiMAX uses asymmetric 29:18 TDD in 10/20 MHz, whereas HSPA and LTE use FDD
with 2 x 5 and 2 x 10/20 MHz
8 •© Prerequisite:
Nokia Siemens Networks. All2x2 MIMO with 64-QAM in Downlink
rights reserved.
>>> Commercially not Binding <<<
Performance Numbers
Spectrum Efficiency Benchmarking
2.5
Full Buffer Simulation Results
Downlink
2.0 Uplink
bps/Hz/cell
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
HSPA R6 HSPA R6 HSPA R7 WiMAX LTE
(TU channel) (Vehicular A) MIMO + reuse 3
64QAM + (29:18 TDD)
equalizer
• Similar spectral efficiency for HSPA evolution and WiMAX due to similar Feature Set
• LTE is expected to provide higher efficiency than HSPA or WiMAX
• WiMax assumed to be deployed in recommended frequency reuse 1/3,
HSPA is definitely deployed in real reuse 1, whereas LTE utilizes fractional tight
9 reuse dueNetworks.
© Nokia Siemens to coordinated
All rights reserved. interference reduction
>>> Commercially not Binding <<<
Performance Numbers
Mobile Technology Capability Limits
6 "# "# $% 2$ 3 >
$ & "# '( 4 0 <
1!
! 1 ! 1
)& * ( 1 , + , + , , ?1 ,
" -- )
0% 0! 0! 0 01 0 0 05 ? 01− 0
. /
" -- ); − + + !1−11 −
.* /
4 ! 7 7 1+ 7 7 7
" *, 9 : 9 : + 8 1 8 +1 9 : ! 8 1!
All radio standards show comparable performance under comparable conditions and similar feature set:
• Laws of physics apply to all of them
• User rates mainly depend on bandwidth, modulation/coding and availability of MIMO (2x2 assumed)
• Spectrum Efficiency is determined by Frequency Reuse and Feature Set (e.g. FSPS, MIMO, …)
• Latency (e.g. PING Performance) depends on chosen Frame Duration or TTI
• Coverage depends on frequency band, RF power limitations and duplex mode
10 © Nokia Siemens Networks. All rights reserved.
>>> Commercially not Binding <<<
LTE or WiMax Market Success, what will be the winning Technology ?
Choosing the right technology path depends on each
operator’s individual situation
E.g.
Available spectrum
Spectrum cost
Regulatory
Standards compliance
constraints
E.g.
Service
s
te
offering
La
ra
te
Competitive
ta
nc
E.g.
Da
situation
y
Population density Technological Legacy
Traffic distribution constraints networks
Demand for Investment
services
Ca
y Protection
Regional
pa
ci ilit Operator
Spending on b Future
communication constraints ty Mo strategy proofness
Availability and Technology
variety of terminals Evolution Path
Site Locations OPEX
Terminal Costs
Incumbent 2G/3G
• Extend 2G to EDGE and EDGE II
mobile operator
• Upgrade to LTE later
ᅛᅛ
(ᅛ)
Roaming WiMax to WiMax
ᅛᅛ ᅛ
ᅛ ᅛ ᅛ (LTE-900) ᅛ ᅛ, if f < 3.5GHz
Coverage
ᅛᅛᅛ ᅛ ᅛ(ᅛ)
Performance Capacity
Latency ᅛᅛᅛ ᅛ ᅛ (ᅛ)
Availability 2009/2010 2007/2008
• LTE comes ~ 2 years later than WiMax and hence provides some technical advantages over WiMax.
• LTE must be seen especially in the context of the mature and world-wide dominating GERAN and
UMTS/HSPA Systems allowing for Handover/Roaming as well as Refarming Scenarios.
• Judgment on the “best” technology, however, depends on specific operator needs and prerequisites.
• LTE and WiMax are basically for different customers in different spectrum: no strong Competition.
•13Nokia© Nokia
Siemens Networks
Siemens Networks. is pleased to offer a strong and comprehensive Portfolio including
All rights reserved.
>>> Commercially not Binding <<<
both WiMax and LTE operating even on the same Platform (NSN FlexiBTS).
Thank You …
Dr. Carsten Ball received the Dipl.-Ing. degree in electrodynamics in 1993 and the Dr.-Ing.
degree in electrical engineering in 1996 from the Technical University of Karlsruhe, Germany.
Since 1997 he is with Siemens Mobile Networks and since April 2007 with Nokia Siemens
Networks (NSN) in Munich, Germany, currently heading the GERAN and OFDM Systems
Architecture Radio & Simulation group. He is responsible for the GSM, GPRS and EDGE
performance as well as for the upcoming OFDM radio technologies (WiMax, LTE). Dr. Ball’s
research interests include simulation, protocol stacks, optimization and efficient algorithm
design in cellular radio networks.
9 : "#
!
$ % ! #
"
Suburban coverage
Lean architecture Broadband data performance Lean architecture Broadband data performance
Full mobility with medium data rates High speed data rates with full mobility
Economy of scale Spectrum availability LTE Economy of scale Spectrum availability WiMAX
and cost impact and cost impact
Lean architecture Broadband data performance Lean architecture Broadband data performance
Broadband multimedia at lowest cost High speed data rates with limited mobility
B B B
B B
6 "# ' 2