Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
a FEMALES
adenopathy, epistaxis, nasal obstruction, audi-
tory problems, and neurologic disorders such
40
0 MALES as paralysis of the cranial nerves, headaches,
and trismus. Rarely, a single sign, such as par-
alysis of the 6th nerve, may be the first indica-
tion of a nasopharyngeal cancer, but often
when the patient is seen there are numerous
clinical findings. Table 1 shows the number of
patients with adenitis (Fig. 3). In at least 24
30 cases, the histologic examination of the biopsy
of a cervical lymph node led to the search for
and discovery of a nasopharyngeal tumor. The
ordinary clinical signs of a neoplasm of the
cavum were insignificant or absent. In 22 pa-
tients, there were enlarged cervical nodes
2( without any alteration of the cavum. These
lymph node metastases were often first treated
as tuberculous adenites. The neurologic signs
may be dominant, and thus the patient may
be treated for a relatively long time period in
neurology before he visits an otolaryngologist.
1c T h e lesion of the base of the skull was noticed
in onIy 18 cases, some at clinical examination
and others during its evolution by radiologic
examination. This bony involvement was ac-
0 -
1-19 20-29 30-3: 10-5960.69 7069 AGE
ASPECTS
CLINICAL
There are many advanced cases of cancer of
the nasopharynx for which all therapeutic in-
tervention is useless (about 16%). The “hid-
den” time, i.e., the time between the manifes-
tation of the tumor and the day the patient
comes for the first consultation is not easy to
establish: in 30 cases this could not be deter-
mined, but it was about 8 months in other pa-
tients. The times ranged between 8 days and 4
FIG. 2. Map of geographical distribution illustrating
years. the proportional incidence of cancer of the naso-
The most frequent clinical signs are cervical pharynx related to the density of the population.
186 Jan iinry 1974
CANCER Vol. 33
TABLE1. The Most Frequent Clinical Signs of rounded, or ovoid. T h e cells demonstrated a
Nasopharyngeai Tumors in Tunisia definite cellular border. They showed trabecu-
Cervical adenopathy 86 lar and lobular patterns, sometimes with base-
Auditory signs 67 ment membrane. This kind of tumor can be
Nasal obstruction 61 seen at any level of the malpighian layer or
Epistaxis 64
paramalpighian layer, especially in the cervix,
Neurologic signs; injury of the
cranial nerves 28 esophagus, and the oral cavity. They represent
42.5% of all epitheliomas (53 cases).
3. T h e nasopharyngeal type carcinoma
companied by neurologic signs in only five pa- (NPTC) is a peculiar neoplasm of the cavum
tients. T h e precise location of the tumor was in that its fundamental histologic feature is
not always identified (104 cases); in 24, the cellular. T h e tumor cells’ borders are not defi-
tumor occupied the whole cavum. Table 2 nite, their nuclei are clear, and chromatin is
shows the possible locations of the neoplasms, scarce. T h e nuclei look “holed.” They exhibit
the roof and lateral walls being the most fre- often two or three distinct nucleoli. They may
quent areas (56.~37~ and 59%). be spindle-cell, rounded, or polyhedric. T h e
syncytial aspect and the poor chromatin of the
PATHO
LOGY nuclei are the fundamental features. T h e
stroma varies sometimes; i t is lymphoid, fib-
Fungiform tumors made up about 811%of rous, or granular, and inflammatory (Figs. 6-
the entire series. Only 11 cases showed infiltra- 8). We had 49 cases, (39% of all the epithe-
tion or ulceration. In five patients, the clinical liomas).
examination of the cavum was not remarka- 4. There were only two cases each of adeno-
ble. T h e tumor was not described macroscopi- carcinoma and anaplastic epithelioma. Among
cally in 50 cases (35%), because a tight trismus the hematosarcomas there were four reticulo-
excluded examination. sarcomas, two lymphosarcomas (Fig. 9), and
Histopathology: Epitheliomas were divided one plasmocytoma. Eight epitheliomas were
as follows: 1. Differentiated epidermoid carci- not classified, either because the biopsy was
noma; 2. Undifferentiated epidermoid carci- too small, or because we did not receive the
noma; 3. Nasopharyngeal type carcinoma histologic slides.
(which we consider typical for this location; 4. T h e distribution of the histologic types ac-
Anaplastic carcinoma. cording to age is interesting. There was only
1. T h e differentiated epidermoid carcinoma one patient under 40 with differentiated epi-
is a cancer in which the squamous structure is dermoid carcinoma. This held true also for
obvious (22 or 17.7%) (Fig. 4). the undifferentiated carcinomas: nine cases
2. T h e undifferentiated epidermoid carci- under 53 years of age. On the other hand, the
noma largely resembles the malpighian mu- nasopharyngeal type carcinoma is more fre-
cosa which is without any keratinization, and quent in younger people, 28 of 42 patients
the cells of which (instead of being always po- were under 40, and all the patients under 20
lyhedral) can be spindle-shaped (Fig. 5), years of age had this type of tumor.
FIG. 5. Photomicro-
graph of a nasopha-
ryngeal cancer i n
which the individual
cells have a spindle-
like pattern (~100).
ported 8 out of 974 cases (0.870);10and Ho in affected men is three times that of women,
Hong Kong reported no more than 15 out of which corresponds to the findings of other
1438 (170).7 It seems that the Caucasian child authors.709
is more susceptible than the Oriental child. From the clinical point of view, there does
T h e statistics compiled by Martin and Blady not seem to be a notable difference in those
in the United States corroborate this impres- countries with a high incidence. Scarcely
sion. They found in a series of 87 cases that known clinically in Tunisia., the nasopharyn-
9% were under 15 years of age, and 18% geal cancer is often discovered too late. T h e
under 30 years of age. They believe that this clinical aspect is the same as that seen in the
kind of cancer affects the child much more Far East,7 in Europe,ll and in the United
often that any other kind of cancer of the res- state^.^ Cervical adenopathy is easily noticed
piratory and digestive tracts. T h e number of on the first examination, and should lead to a
systematic examination of the cavum. T h e lo- histologic entity based on his study of 32 ne-
cation of the tumor appears most often in the cropsies. T h e lymphoid tissue, intimately
lateral and posterior walls. mixed with the epithelioma spans, does not
From the pathologic point of view, the na- appear in the visceral metastases. YehI7 found
sopharyngeal cancer appears frequently as a that the tumor cells of the lymphoepithelioma
fungating tumor, but also as a diffuse submu- were similar to the cells of the transitional cell
cous infiltration, somewhat deforming the epithelioma described by Cappell.3 He noted
walls. At times the macroscopic examination several biopsies in which the lymphoepithe-
is negative, leading to several successive biop- lioma and transitional cell epithelioma were
sies done “blindly.” situated side by side. He demonstrated with
T h e histopathology of this type of tumor is biopsies taken from people in good health and
debatable. Several classifications have been of all ages, that the lymphoid tissue was al-
proposed. Shu Yeh, after about 1,000 biopsies, ways present, and as such, it was an integral
created a very detailed classification which in- part of the nasopharyngeal mucosa. So it is to
cluded 9 histologic types. After having studied be expected that the epithelioma cells are
this classification as it related to prognosis, he more or less lost in this tissue.
found that survival did not depend on the his- A comparison between the nasopharyngeal
tologic types, and finally retained only two; and lymph node biopsies on the same patient
the classic epidermoid epithelioma, and the shows that the important lymphoid element
undifferentiated epidermoid epithelioma. in the cavum can be absent and substituted by
W e believe that the lymphoepithelioma of a fibrous tissue on the adenopathic level. T h e
Regaud and Schmincke is debatable and does contrary is also true: a fibrous stroma on the
not seem to be an established entity.e~15~17nasopharyngeal level can be lymphoid type in
Teoh argues against the existence of such a the invaded lymph node. Furthermore, in the
190 CANCERJanuary 1974 VOl. 33
FIG. 8. Photomicro-
graph of a tumor
with the characteristic
nuclear appearance
(X400).
same biopsy, the histologic aspect can vary tiated epidermoid epithelioma, the undifferen-
from one zone to another, seen especially in tiated epithelioma, and the transitional cell
the larger fragments. epithelioma, may all be found in the same ad-
Besides the lymphoepithelioma debate, the enopathy or i n the same nasopharyngeal
various histologic types, such as the differen- biopsy. We have a typical example of these
REFERENCES
1. Bailar, J.: Nasopharyngeal cancer in white popu- 2. Cappell, D. F.: On lympho-epithblioma of naso-
lations-A world-wide survey. I n Cancer of the Naso- pharynx and tonsils. J. Pathol. Bacterial. 3949-64,
pharynx: A symposium Organized by the International 1934.
Union Against Cancer, monograph series, vol. 1, C. S . 3. --: Pathology of the nasopharyngeal tumors.
Muir and K. Shamugaratnan, Eds., Copenhagen, J. Lnryngol. Otol. 53:55-580, 1938.
Munksgaard, 1967. 4. Chadli, A., and Philippe, E.: La physionomie du
192 CANCERJanuary 1974 VOl. 33
cancer en Tunisie. Archives de I'lnstitut Pasteur de series vol. 1, C. S. Muir and K. Shamugaratnan, Eds.
Tunis 37:397,441, 1960. Copenhagen, Munksgaard, 1967; pp. 47-53.
5. Godfredsen, E.: Cited by Ho.: Ophtalmology and 11. Nelsen, J.: Roentgen treatment of malignant tu-
neurology symptoms of malignant naso-pharyngeal tu- mors of nasopharynx. Acta Radiol. 26: 133-154, 1945.
mors, a clinical study comprising 454 cases. with special 12. Regaud.: Personal communication cited by Rev-
reference to histopathology and possibility of earlier erchon and Coutard.
recognition. Acta. Psychiatr. Scand. [Suppl.] 34: 1-323, 13. Reverchon and Coutard: LymphoQpith&lioma
1944. de l'hypopharynx trait6 par roentgentherapie sans
6. Hawser, I. J., and Brownell, D. H.: Malignant rkaction notable du pharynx et du larynx. Bull. MLm.
neoplasms of nasopharynx. J A M A 11~ 2 4 6 7 2473,
, 1938. SOC. Franq. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. 34:209-214, 1921.
7. Ho, H. C.: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma in H o n g 14. Sitbon, J.: La cancer du cavum en Algbrie. Bull.
Kong. In Cancer of the Naso-pharynx; A Symposium Alg. Carcinol. 2:385, 1959.
Organized by the International Union Against Cancer, 15. Teoh, T. B.: Epidmmoid carcinoma of nasophar-
Monograph series, vol. 1, C. S. Muir and K. Shamugar- ynx among Chinese study of 31 necropsies. J. Puthol.
atnan, Eds. Copenhagen, Munksgaard, 1967; pp. 58-63. Bacteriol. 73:451-465, 1957.
8. Mansouri et al.: Difficulties et erreurs de diagnos- 16. Vaeth, J. M.: Nasopharyngeal malignant tu-
tic dans les tumeurs malignes du cavum. Tunis. Med. mors-82 consecutive patients treated in a period of 22
1:81-83, 1968. years. Radiology 742366372, 1960.
17. Yeh, Shu: A histological classification of carcino-
9. Martin, H. E., and Baldy, J. V.: Cancer of the na- mas of the nasopharynx with a critical review as to ex-
sopharynx. Arch. Otolatyngol. 32:692-727, 1940. istence of lymphoepitheliomas. Cancer 15:895-920,
10. Muir, C. S., and Shamugartnan, K.: The inci- 1962.
dence of nasopharyngeal cancer in Singapore. In Can- 18. Zaouche, A.: Les tumeurs malignes de la sphhre
cer of the Nasopharynx; A Symposium Organized by O.R.L. en Tunisie. Th&e de Mkdecine facultt de
the International Union Against Cancer, monograph Mkdecine de Paris. 37:397-441, 1960.