Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
www.elsevier.com/locate/optcom
a
Department of Telecommunication Engineering, Mahanakorn University of Technology, Bangkok 10530, Thailand
b
Department of Interdisciplinary Studies, Faculty of Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
c
Department of Electronics Engineering, Optoelectronics Research Centre, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Received 4 May 2003; received in revised form 9 September 2003; accepted 10 September 2003
Abstract
PACS: 42.81.Dp
0030-4018/$ - see front matter Ó 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2003.09.032
100 T. Mayteevarunyoo et al. / Optics Communications 227 (2003) 99–106
In many works, the filters were taken with a envelope in physical units, n2 ¼ 2:6 1016 cm2 /W
sliding bandpass central frequency X of the filters, is the Kerr coefficient in silica, x0 is the central
i.e., X was varying linearly along the fiber link (this frequency, Aeff ¼ 75 lm2 is a typical value of the
arrangement of the filters was first proposed in [9] effective fiberÕs cross-section area, and c is the
as an effective means to separate solitons and speed of light. Further, LD ¼ s20 =jbref j is a charac-
noise). However, still missing is a systematic study teristic dispersion length, where s0 is a character-
of fundamental properties of DM solitons subject istic time scale for a soliton, which we chose to be
to the action of lumped frequency-sliding filters, 10 ps, and bref is a reference value of the GVD
such as relations between the solitonsÕ peak power coefficient, that we set to be equal to a typical
and DM map strength, the dependence of the value of the average dispersion in the DM system,
maximum frequency-sliding (FS) slope, which ad- )0.45 ps2 /km. The propagation distance z and
mits stable solitons, on the path-average value of DM-map period zmap in Eq. (1) are Z=LD and
the GVD (group-velocity dispersion) in the link Lmap =LD , respectively, where Z and Lmap are the
and DM strength, etc. An objective of the present distance and DM-map period in physical units.
work is to obtain such dynamical characteristics The time t is normalized as t ¼ s=s0 , where s is the
for the DM solitons in the system controlled by local time in the reference frame moving with the
lumped FS filters. As the full model of this system group velocity of the carrier wave.
is too complex for consistent analytical consider- Other quantities are normalized as follows:
ation (see below), we rely upon systematic nu- DðzÞ ¼ bðzÞ=jbref j, where bðzÞ is the physical
merical simulations. GVD coefficient, G ¼ DgLD is the excess power
The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, gain, necessary to compensate the filtering loss,
we present formulation of the model. Results, which is measured in dB [the numerical factor
including the above-mentioned relations between appearing in Eq. (1) is 20/ln 10 8.69], where Dg is
the solitonÕs peak power, DM map strength, the dimensional excess gain (which is measured in
and the maximum FS slope, are given in Section 3. units of the inverse length). On the right-hand side
At the end of Section 3, we also briefly display of Eq. (1), F^j is the filtering operator correspond-
results for intra-channel interactions between sol- ing to filters with the Gaussian spectral transmis-
itons (which show that the frequency-sliding does sion function, so that the jth filter transforms the
not significantly affect the maximum collision incoming signal in the Fourier space as follows:
length). Section 4 concludes the work.
uðxÞ ! F^j ðxÞuðxÞ
h i
2
exp aðx Xj Þ uðxÞ; ð2Þ
2. Formulation of the model
where a ¼ LD =ð4p2 B2f s20 Lamp Þ is the normalized
The optical pulse propagation in a system positive parameter representing the filtering
with varying dispersion and periodic lumped strength, with Bf and Lamp being the filterÕs band-
amplification and filtering is governed by the width and spacing between adjacent filters. The FS
perturbed nonlinear Schr€
odinger equation [1]. In techniques assume that the central transmission
the dimensionless form the equation takes the frequency of the given filter, Xj , varies linearly
form along the link
Xj ¼ X0 þ jX0 zmap ; ð3Þ
ou 1 o2 u
i þ DðzÞ 2 þ juj2 u 0
oz 2 ot where X ¼ 2ps0 f LD is the normalized FS slope, f 0
0
X
G being the FS slope of the filters in physical units of
¼i dðz nzmap Þ ^
þ Fj u: ð1Þ
8:69 GHz/Mm. Note that in Eq. (1), the fiber loss is not
n
explicitly included in the model, as it is assumed
Here, the field envelope u is normalized so that that it is compensated by the main part of the gain
1=2
u ¼ Eðn2 x0 LD =Aeff cÞ , where E is the electric field provided by the amplifiers.
T. Mayteevarunyoo et al. / Optics Communications 227 (2003) 99–106 101
In this paper, we consider the transmission of filtering [2] and in the presence of it [8], the most
scheme shown in Fig. 1. The distribution of the adequate dynamical characteristic is not the width
GVD coefficient bðzÞ inside one period of the link, itself, but rather the DM map strength, which is
2
0 < z < Lmap , is taken in the standard symmetric defined as follows: S ¼ ðbn Ln þ jba jLa ÞðsFWHM Þ ,
form where Ln;a are lengths of the normal- and anoma-
8 lous-GVD segments (recall that, in the present
< ba ; 0 < z 6 Lmap =4;
setting, they are Ln ¼ La ¼ Lmap =2). Below, results
bðzÞ ¼ bn ; Lmap =4 < z 6 3Lmap =4; ð4Þ
: for stable solitons will be presented in terms of P
ba ; 3Lmap =4 < z 6 Lmap ;
and S.
where bn > 0 and ba < 0 are values of the GVD
coefficient in the normal- and anomalous-GVD
segments (the nonlinearity coefficient is assumed to 3. Simulation results
be the same in both species of the fiber that form
the DM map). An important parameter of the 3.1. Dynamics of an isolated soliton
system is the path-average dispersion (PAD),
b ðbn þ ba Þ=2, which may have either sign, but Fundamental dynamical properties of solitons
its absolute value is assumed to be much smaller in the present model are described by plots which
than the local values jbn;a j. The amplifier and filter summarize results extracted from many runs of
are placed in the middle of the anomalous-GVD simulations of the soliton evolution in Eq. (1). The
segments, so that the amplification/filtering spac- simulations were performed by means of the
ing Lamp coincides with Lmap (as is known, placing standard split-step method, launching a Gaussian
filters inside the normal-GVD segments gives rise pulse, in the form of uð0; tÞ ¼ expðt2 Þ, at the
to instability of DM solitons [6]). midpoint of the anomalous-GVD segment ba . The
Basic characteristics of a solitary pulse are its FWHM width of the initial pulse, sFWHM , DM-
2
peak power, i.e., the value of P juj at the pulseÕs map period, Lmap , and the filter bandwidth, Bf ,
center, and the full-width at half-maximum were set to be, respectively, 11.77 ps, 40 km, and
(FWHM), sFWHM . They are taken at points where 265 GHz. With these parameters fixed, the gain G
the soliton is narrowest, i.e., the peak power is in Eq. (1), the GVD coefficients bn;a in Eq. (4), and
largest and width is smallest (usually, these are the initial peak power of the soliton were varied, in
midpoints of the anomalous-GVD segments). As is order to find stable soliton-propagation regimes.
well known, for DM solitons, both in the absence The soliton was identified as a stable one if the
numerically simulated transmission remained
completely robust over, at least, 200 periods of the
system, i.e., 8000 km (in many cases, simulation
L amp
Amplifier runs demonstrating stable solitons were much
βn
Filter longer). A typical example of the formation of a
stable soliton (in the case of zero PAD) is shown in
Fig. 2 for the following parameters: S ¼ 4:1; b ¼ 0;
G ¼ 0:0982 dB; Bf ¼ 265 GHz; and X0 ¼ 1:5
β (f 0 ¼ 107 GHz/Mm). As concerns the above-
βa mentioned fixed values of the initial solitonÕs
width, DM-map period, and filter bandwidth,
L
map simulations were also run at other values of these
parameters, which produced results very similar to
β : anomalous fiber
a
those displayed in this paper.
β : normal fiber
n
Both in the standard DM model without fil-
Fig. 1. Schematic representation of the dispersion-managed tering [2], and in its generalization including fixed-
transmission line with lumped amplifiers and filters. frequency filters [8], the most fundamental set of
102 T. Mayteevarunyoo et al. / Optics Communications 227 (2003) 99–106
Ω′ = 0
′
Ω = 1.4
Ω ′ = 1.9 –0.1
20 2
–0.2
–0.4 0 ps 2/km
Normalized Power, P
1.5
15
0.1
max
Ω′
0.3
1
10
0.5
5
0
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
(a) Map Strength, S
15
10
6
5
S max
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
(b) Map Strength, S
2
25
Ω′ = 0
Ω ′ = 0.6
′
Ω =1
20
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Normalized Power, P
5
equation for the solitonÕs energy, in order to take
the filtering and compensating gain into regard. In
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
particular, it was predicted that the maximum
(c) slope had to scale inversely proportional to the
Fig. 3. The normalized peak power of the DM soliton vs. the
PAD coefficient, and be independent of S. It is
DM map strength for the different frequency-sliding slope X0 . seen from Fig. 4 that X0max indeed decreases with
The panels (a)–(c) correspond, respectively, to b ¼ 0:1 ps2 / the absolute value of PAD, although the depen-
km, b ¼ 0 ps2 /km, and b ¼ þ0:1 ps2 /km. dence is essentially less steep than the inverse
104 T. Mayteevarunyoo et al. / Optics Communications 227 (2003) 99–106
S max
between the three cases.
3
2 Ω
′
max
3.2. Interaction between the solitons
Ω′ = 0
Ω ′ = 1.4
Ω ′ = 1.9
0.15
G (dB)
0.1
0.05
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
(a) Fig. 9. An example of the interaction between two DM solitons
in the system with fixed-frequency filters (X0 ¼ 0). Here,
0.2
Ω′ = 0 S ¼ 1:95, b ¼ 0:45 ps2 /km, Bf ¼ 265 GHz, G ¼ 0:135 dB, and
Ω ′ = 1.5 the initial separation between the solitons is Ds ¼ 50 ps.
0.15
25
without filtering
Ω′ = 0
G (dB)
0.1
Ω′ = 0.2
Ω′ = 0.5
20 ′
Ω = 0.75
′
Ω =1
0.05
15
Lcoll (Mm)
0 10
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
(b)
0.2
5
Ω′ = 0
Ω′ = 0.6
Ω′ = 1
0
0.15 0 1 2 3 4
Map Strength, S
Fig. 10. The collision length vs. the DM map strength in the
case of anomalous path-average dispersion, b ¼ 0:45 ps2 /km,
G (dB)
0.1
for different values of the SF slope.
2.5
Gain (dB) Simultaneously, borders of the solitonsÕ stability
Map strength
max. collision length (107m) region were delineated. The borders were de-
2
scribed by plots showing the maximum DM map
strength and FS slope, beyond which stable soli-
tons cannot be found. The efficiency of the system
S, G , Lcoll, max
1.5
was also characterized by curves showing the ex-
cess gain, which is necessary to compensate for the
1 filtering loss, vs. the DM map strength, at different
values of the FS slope and PAD. We have also
found that the maximum collision length, which
0.5
characterizes the intra-channel interaction between
two solitons, is not significantly affected by the
0 frequency-sliding.
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
′
Ω