Sie sind auf Seite 1von 8

Optics Communications 227 (2003) 99–106

www.elsevier.com/locate/optcom

Fundamental properties of dispersion-managed solitons


in systems with lumped frequency-sliding filters
a,*
T. Mayteevarunyoo , Boris A. Malomed b, P.L. Chu c, A. Roeksabutr a

a
Department of Telecommunication Engineering, Mahanakorn University of Technology, Bangkok 10530, Thailand
b
Department of Interdisciplinary Studies, Faculty of Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
c
Department of Electronics Engineering, Optoelectronics Research Centre, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Received 4 May 2003; received in revised form 9 September 2003; accepted 10 September 2003

Abstract

By means of systematic numerical simulations, we investigate dynamical characteristics of dispersion-managed


(DM) solitons in the system using lumped frequency-sliding (FS) filters to control transmission of the solitons. The most
fundamental characteristic of the system is the solitonÕs peak power as a function the DM map strength. A compre-
hensive set of such characteristics is produced at different values of the FS slope and path-average dispersion (PAD),
which may be anomalous, zero, and normal. Simultaneously, stability borders for the solitons are identified. The
borders are presented in the form of plots showing the largest DM map strength and FS slope, beyond which stable
solitons are not found. The efficiency of the system is also characterized by curves showing the excess gain, which is
necessary to compensate the loss incurred by the filters, vs. the DM map strength, at different values of the FS slope and
PAD. Intra-channel interactions between solitons are studied too. It is concluded that the frequency-sliding does not
significantly affect the corresponding collision length in comparison with the case of fixed-frequency filters.
Ó 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PACS: 42.81.Dp

Keywords: Soliton; Optical communication; Dispersion management

1. Introduction mission in fiber-optic telecommunication networks


[1–3]. In fact, DM is a generic feature of the de-
Dispersion management (DM) is a well-known ployed long-haul fiber links, as they all are subject
technique which has a great potential for im- to dispersion compensation. Another generic in-
proving many characteristics of the soliton trans- gredient of the networks are guiding filters, which,
in the case of solitons, help to suppress their timing
jitter and interactions between them. For these
*
Corresponding author. Tel.: +6629883655; fax: +66298 reasons, the interplay of DM and filters has
84040. attracted considerable attention in both experi-
E-mail address: thawatch@mut.ac.th (T. Mayteevarunyoo). mental [4,5] and theoretical [6–8] studies.

0030-4018/$ - see front matter Ó 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2003.09.032
100 T. Mayteevarunyoo et al. / Optics Communications 227 (2003) 99–106

In many works, the filters were taken with a envelope in physical units, n2 ¼ 2:6  1016 cm2 /W
sliding bandpass central frequency X of the filters, is the Kerr coefficient in silica, x0 is the central
i.e., X was varying linearly along the fiber link (this frequency, Aeff ¼ 75 lm2 is a typical value of the
arrangement of the filters was first proposed in [9] effective fiberÕs cross-section area, and c is the
as an effective means to separate solitons and speed of light. Further, LD ¼ s20 =jbref j is a charac-
noise). However, still missing is a systematic study teristic dispersion length, where s0 is a character-
of fundamental properties of DM solitons subject istic time scale for a soliton, which we chose to be
to the action of lumped frequency-sliding filters, 10 ps, and bref is a reference value of the GVD
such as relations between the solitonsÕ peak power coefficient, that we set to be equal to a typical
and DM map strength, the dependence of the value of the average dispersion in the DM system,
maximum frequency-sliding (FS) slope, which ad- )0.45 ps2 /km. The propagation distance z and
mits stable solitons, on the path-average value of DM-map period zmap in Eq. (1) are Z=LD and
the GVD (group-velocity dispersion) in the link Lmap =LD , respectively, where Z and Lmap are the
and DM strength, etc. An objective of the present distance and DM-map period in physical units.
work is to obtain such dynamical characteristics The time t is normalized as t ¼ s=s0 , where s is the
for the DM solitons in the system controlled by local time in the reference frame moving with the
lumped FS filters. As the full model of this system group velocity of the carrier wave.
is too complex for consistent analytical consider- Other quantities are normalized as follows:
ation (see below), we rely upon systematic nu- DðzÞ ¼ bðzÞ=jbref j, where bðzÞ is the physical
merical simulations. GVD coefficient, G ¼ DgLD is the excess power
The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, gain, necessary to compensate the filtering loss,
we present formulation of the model. Results, which is measured in dB [the numerical factor
including the above-mentioned relations between appearing in Eq. (1) is 20/ln 10  8.69], where Dg is
the solitonÕs peak power, DM map strength, the dimensional excess gain (which is measured in
and the maximum FS slope, are given in Section 3. units of the inverse length). On the right-hand side
At the end of Section 3, we also briefly display of Eq. (1), F^j is the filtering operator correspond-
results for intra-channel interactions between sol- ing to filters with the Gaussian spectral transmis-
itons (which show that the frequency-sliding does sion function, so that the jth filter transforms the
not significantly affect the maximum collision incoming signal in the Fourier space as follows:
length). Section 4 concludes the work.
uðxÞ ! F^j ðxÞuðxÞ
h i
2
 exp  aðx  Xj Þ uðxÞ; ð2Þ
2. Formulation of the model
where a ¼ LD =ð4p2 B2f s20 Lamp Þ is the normalized
The optical pulse propagation in a system positive parameter representing the filtering
with varying dispersion and periodic lumped strength, with Bf and Lamp being the filterÕs band-
amplification and filtering is governed by the width and spacing between adjacent filters. The FS
perturbed nonlinear Schr€
odinger equation [1]. In techniques assume that the central transmission
the dimensionless form the equation takes the frequency of the given filter, Xj , varies linearly
form along the link
Xj ¼ X0 þ jX0 zmap ; ð3Þ
ou 1 o2 u
i þ DðzÞ 2 þ juj2 u 0
oz 2 ot where X ¼ 2ps0 f LD is the normalized FS slope, f 0
0

X  
G being the FS slope of the filters in physical units of
¼i dðz  nzmap Þ ^
þ Fj u: ð1Þ
8:69 GHz/Mm. Note that in Eq. (1), the fiber loss is not
n
explicitly included in the model, as it is assumed
Here, the field envelope u is normalized so that that it is compensated by the main part of the gain
1=2
u ¼ Eðn2 x0 LD =Aeff cÞ , where E is the electric field provided by the amplifiers.
T. Mayteevarunyoo et al. / Optics Communications 227 (2003) 99–106 101

In this paper, we consider the transmission of filtering [2] and in the presence of it [8], the most
scheme shown in Fig. 1. The distribution of the adequate dynamical characteristic is not the width
GVD coefficient bðzÞ inside one period of the link, itself, but rather the DM map strength, which is
2
0 < z < Lmap , is taken in the standard symmetric defined as follows: S ¼ ðbn Ln þ jba jLa ÞðsFWHM Þ ,
form where Ln;a are lengths of the normal- and anoma-
8 lous-GVD segments (recall that, in the present
< ba ; 0 < z 6 Lmap =4;
setting, they are Ln ¼ La ¼ Lmap =2). Below, results
bðzÞ ¼ bn ; Lmap =4 < z 6 3Lmap =4; ð4Þ
: for stable solitons will be presented in terms of P
ba ; 3Lmap =4 < z 6 Lmap ;
and S.
where bn > 0 and ba < 0 are values of the GVD
coefficient in the normal- and anomalous-GVD
segments (the nonlinearity coefficient is assumed to 3. Simulation results
be the same in both species of the fiber that form
the DM map). An important parameter of the 3.1. Dynamics of an isolated soliton
system is the path-average dispersion (PAD),
b  ðbn þ ba Þ=2, which may have either sign, but Fundamental dynamical properties of solitons
its absolute value is assumed to be much smaller in the present model are described by plots which
than the local values jbn;a j. The amplifier and filter summarize results extracted from many runs of
are placed in the middle of the anomalous-GVD simulations of the soliton evolution in Eq. (1). The
segments, so that the amplification/filtering spac- simulations were performed by means of the
ing Lamp coincides with Lmap (as is known, placing standard split-step method, launching a Gaussian
filters inside the normal-GVD segments gives rise pulse, in the form of uð0; tÞ ¼ expðt2 Þ, at the
to instability of DM solitons [6]). midpoint of the anomalous-GVD segment ba . The
Basic characteristics of a solitary pulse are its FWHM width of the initial pulse, sFWHM , DM-
2
peak power, i.e., the value of P  juj at the pulseÕs map period, Lmap , and the filter bandwidth, Bf ,
center, and the full-width at half-maximum were set to be, respectively, 11.77 ps, 40 km, and
(FWHM), sFWHM . They are taken at points where 265 GHz. With these parameters fixed, the gain G
the soliton is narrowest, i.e., the peak power is in Eq. (1), the GVD coefficients bn;a in Eq. (4), and
largest and width is smallest (usually, these are the initial peak power of the soliton were varied, in
midpoints of the anomalous-GVD segments). As is order to find stable soliton-propagation regimes.
well known, for DM solitons, both in the absence The soliton was identified as a stable one if the
numerically simulated transmission remained
completely robust over, at least, 200 periods of the
system, i.e., 8000 km (in many cases, simulation
L amp
Amplifier runs demonstrating stable solitons were much
βn
Filter longer). A typical example of the formation of a
stable soliton (in the case of zero PAD) is shown in
Fig. 2 for the following parameters: S ¼ 4:1; b ¼ 0;
G ¼ 0:0982 dB; Bf ¼ 265 GHz; and X0 ¼ 1:5
β (f 0 ¼ 107 GHz/Mm). As concerns the above-
βa mentioned fixed values of the initial solitonÕs
width, DM-map period, and filter bandwidth,
L
map simulations were also run at other values of these
parameters, which produced results very similar to
β : anomalous fiber
a
those displayed in this paper.
β : normal fiber
n
Both in the standard DM model without fil-
Fig. 1. Schematic representation of the dispersion-managed tering [2], and in its generalization including fixed-
transmission line with lumped amplifiers and filters. frequency filters [8], the most fundamental set of
102 T. Mayteevarunyoo et al. / Optics Communications 227 (2003) 99–106

and normal-PAD solitons [8] (in [8], this result was


obtained for the model with uniformly distributed
filtering, but the same conclusion remains true in
the case of lumped filters). At very large values of
S, the solitons become unstable, similar to the
unfiltered model.
Sets of the characteristics P ðSÞ for the solitons
in the present model are shown, for three different
values of PAD, b ¼ 0:1; 0, and +0.1 ps2 /km, in
Figs. 3(a)–(c), respectively. In each panel, the
curves are distinguished by the value of the FS
slope X0 . The curves in Fig. 3 are not aborted ar-
Fig. 2. An example of the formation of a stable soliton from an
bitrarily; in fact, each one terminates at a point
initial Gaussian pulse in the case of zero path-average disper- beyond which no stable soliton could be found in
sion, b ¼ 0, with S ¼ 4:1, X0 ¼ 1:5. Waveforms are plotted at simulations.
every five DM maps. This figure and all the ones displayed In each panel in Fig. 3, curves pertaining to
below pertain to the value of the filter bandwidth Bf ¼ 265 different values of X0 drastically differ in the loca-
GHz.
tion of the termination point. Obviously, this is an
important feature specific to the FS-filtered sys-
tem. It is quantified by plots showing the largest
dynamical characteristics of (stable) solitons is value of the FS slope, X0max , vs. S (Fig. 4), and the
represented by curves of P vs. S (peak power vs. largest value of the DM map strength, Smax , vs. X0
DM map strength), drawn at different fixed values (Fig. 5), up to which stable solitons can be found.
of the PAD b. In the case of the DM system In both these figures, the curves terminate (as well
without filtering, these curves reveal a drastic dif- as in Fig. 3) at points beyond which stable solitons
ference between the cases of the anomalous, zero, do not exist.
and normal PAD, i.e., b < 0, b ¼ 0, and b > 0, It is noteworthy that, in Fig. 5, Smax decreases
respectively, the curves P ðSÞ pertaining to b < 0 almost exactly linearly with X0 , and in the limit of
and b > 0 being separated by the one for b ¼ 0. In the fixed-frequency filtering, i.e., X0 ¼ 0, all the
particular, in the limit of small P (a quasi-linear lines in this figure converge almost to one point.
DM system), b ¼ 0 corresponds to S ¼ Scr  3:9 The latter observation implies that, in the DM
[2] (an analytical variational approximation pre- system with the lumped fixed-frequency filters, the
dicts Scr  4:8 [3]), and the solitons at anomalous largest value of the DM strength, Smax , which ad-
and normal PAD exist, respectively, with S < Scr mits the existence of stable solitons is nearly con-
and S > Scr . With the increase of P , the border stant (as concerns its dependence on the PAD
between the anomalous- and normal-PAD regions, coefficient b). Although the present work is
Scr ðP Þ, shifts to larger values of S [2]. At very large focused on the FS system, we have specially in-
values of S (roughly, S > 10) all the DM solitons vestigated the dependence Smax ðbÞ in the fixed-
loose their stability, both for P ! 0 and finite P frequency model, to verify that it indeed complies
[2,3,10]. with the expectation, see Fig. 6. We have also
A qualitative difference of the situation in the checked that, in the limit X0 ! 0, the characteris-
DM model with the fixed-frequency filtering from tics P ðSÞ shown in Fig. 3 precisely carry over into
that outlined above is that the critical value of the those in the fixed-frequency-filtering model.
DM map strength S no longer exists in the filtered It is relevant to mention that some analytical
model. Instead, there appears a critical value Pcr ðSÞ prediction for the maximum FS slope admitting
of the solitonÕs peak power: at a given value of S, the existence of stable solitons was obtained in [7]
it separates the existence regions, P > Pcr and by means of an approach combining the varia-
P < Pcr , respectively, of stable anomalous-PAD tional approximation for DM solitons and balance
T. Mayteevarunyoo et al. / Optics Communications 227 (2003) 99–106 103

Ω′ = 0

Ω = 1.4
Ω ′ = 1.9 –0.1

20 2

–0.2
–0.4 0 ps 2/km
Normalized Power, P

1.5
15
0.1

max
Ω′
0.3
1
10

0.5
5

0
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
(a) Map Strength, S

Fig. 4. The maximum value of the frequency-sliding slope, up


25
Ω′ = 0 to which stable solitons can be found in simulations, vs. the DM
Ω ′ = 1.5 map strength for anomalous, zero, and normal path-average
dispersion (diamonds, circles, and squares, respectively).
20
Normalized Power, P

15

10
6

5
S max

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
(b) Map Strength, S

2
25
Ω′ = 0
Ω ′ = 0.6

Ω =1

20
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Normalized Power, P

15 Fig. 5. The maximum value of the DM map strength, up to


which stable solitons are found in simulations, vs. the frequency-
sliding slope for anomalous, zero, and normal path-average
10 dispersion (dashed, dotted, and solid curves, respectively).

5
equation for the solitonÕs energy, in order to take
the filtering and compensating gain into regard. In
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
particular, it was predicted that the maximum
(c) slope had to scale inversely proportional to the
Fig. 3. The normalized peak power of the DM soliton vs. the
PAD coefficient, and be independent of S. It is
DM map strength for the different frequency-sliding slope X0 . seen from Fig. 4 that X0max indeed decreases with
The panels (a)–(c) correspond, respectively, to b ¼ 0:1 ps2 / the absolute value of PAD, although the depen-
km, b ¼ 0 ps2 /km, and b ¼ þ0:1 ps2 /km. dence is essentially less steep than the inverse
104 T. Mayteevarunyoo et al. / Optics Communications 227 (2003) 99–106

esting features, elucidated by these plots, are the


existence of a maximum of X0max at a finite anom-
8
alous value of the PAD, and the fact that, contrary
to the expectation that all the characteristics con-
cerning the soliton stability must weaken in the
6
case of the normal PAD, Smax steeply grows with b
when it is positive. However, the curves in Fig. 7
4
terminate at the point (right edge) b  0:35 ps2 /
km. This value is an absolute limit for the case
considered here: no stable soliton can be found at
2
a still larger normal PAD if the DM-map period
and filter bandwidth are fixed as above, with
0
Lmap ¼ 40 km and Bf ¼ 265 GHz. On the contrary
–0.8 –0.6 –0.4 –0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6
to this, there is no limit from the side of anomalous
PAD: the curves in Fig. 7 were aborted at b ¼ 1
Fig. 6. The maximum value of the DM map strength, beyond
arbitrarily (investigation of the region with still
which stable solitons do not exist, vs. the path-average disper-
sion in the system with lumped fixed-frequency filters (no slid- larger values of b does not reveal anything re-
ing). markable).
The original objective of introducing the FS
filters in soliton-transmission schemes was sup-
proportionality. However, our results show that, pression of the optical noise [9]. As is well known,
contrary to the case considered in [7], the depen- the main source of the noise is spontaneous emis-
dence of X0max on S is quite conspicuous. sion by amplifiers [1]. For this reason, an optimum
The data presented by dint of Figs. 3–5 can be design of the fiber link should minimize the gain
further summarized in the form of plots (Fig. 7) assigned to the amplifiers. Thus, another issue of
which show the values of the FS slope and DM considerable interest is dependence of the gain G,
map strength, at which particular curves displayed which is necessary to compensate the filtering loss
in Figs. 3–5 terminate for a given value of the PAD (see Eq. (1)), on relevant parameters. In the sim-
coefficient, as functions of this coefficient. Inter- ulations, the smallest value of G, which makes it
possible to support stable solitons, was sought for
at various values of S, b, and X0 . The results are
summarized in Fig. 8, the three panels of which
6 display G vs. S at different values of X0 , in the cases
of the anomalous, zero, and normal PAD. These
5
plots suggest that there is no drastic difference in
the necessary values of the compensating gain
Ω ′max , S max

S max
between the three cases.
3

2 Ω

max
3.2. Interaction between the solitons

1 Having investigated the dynamical characteris-


tics of the isolated DM soliton, the next natural
0
–1 –0.5 0 0.5 step is to examine interactions between them (in-
side the same wavelength channel; see, e.g. [11]).
Fig. 7. The maximum values of the sliding-frequency slope and Fig. 9 displays an example of the intra-channel
DM map strength, at which the curves in Figs. 3–5 terminate, as interaction between two DM solitons in the model
functions of the path-average dispersion. with fixed-frequency filters (X0 ¼ 0).
T. Mayteevarunyoo et al. / Optics Communications 227 (2003) 99–106 105

Ω′ = 0
Ω ′ = 1.4
Ω ′ = 1.9

0.15
G (dB)

0.1

0.05

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
(a) Fig. 9. An example of the interaction between two DM solitons
in the system with fixed-frequency filters (X0 ¼ 0). Here,
0.2
Ω′ = 0 S ¼ 1:95, b ¼ 0:45 ps2 /km, Bf ¼ 265 GHz, G ¼ 0:135 dB, and
Ω ′ = 1.5 the initial separation between the solitons is Ds ¼ 50 ps.

0.15

25
without filtering
Ω′ = 0
G (dB)

0.1
Ω′ = 0.2
Ω′ = 0.5
20 ′
Ω = 0.75

Ω =1

0.05
15
Lcoll (Mm)

0 10
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
(b)
0.2
5
Ω′ = 0
Ω′ = 0.6
Ω′ = 1

0
0.15 0 1 2 3 4
Map Strength, S

Fig. 10. The collision length vs. the DM map strength in the
case of anomalous path-average dispersion, b ¼ 0:45 ps2 /km,
G (dB)

0.1
for different values of the SF slope.

0.05 For different values of the FS slope X0 , we have


produced a dependence of the collision length,
Lcoll , on the DM map strength, fixing the PAD and
0 filter bandwidth, b ¼ 0:45 ps2 /km and Bf ¼
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
(c) 265 GHz, respectively. The result is shown in
Fig. 10. As is seen, the FS significantly increases
Fig. 8. The excess gain, necessary to compensate the filtering
Lcoll (i.e., the maximum propagation distance
loss, as a function of the DM map strength, at different fixed
values of the frequency-sliding slope. The panels (a)–(c) per- beyond which the interaction will make the fiber-
tain to b ¼ 0:1 ps2 /km, b ¼ 0 ps2 /km, and b ¼ þ0:1 ps2 /km, optic link unusable [11]) against the fixed-
respectively. frequency case only at small values of the DM
106 T. Mayteevarunyoo et al. / Optics Communications 227 (2003) 99–106

2.5
Gain (dB) Simultaneously, borders of the solitonsÕ stability
Map strength
max. collision length (107m) region were delineated. The borders were de-
2
scribed by plots showing the maximum DM map
strength and FS slope, beyond which stable soli-
tons cannot be found. The efficiency of the system
S, G , Lcoll, max

1.5
was also characterized by curves showing the ex-
cess gain, which is necessary to compensate for the
1 filtering loss, vs. the DM map strength, at different
values of the FS slope and PAD. We have also
found that the maximum collision length, which
0.5
characterizes the intra-channel interaction between
two solitons, is not significantly affected by the
0 frequency-sliding.
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

Fig. 11. The DM map strength, excess gain and maximum


collision length vs. the SF slope.
Acknowledgements

T.M. and B.A.M. appreciate hospitality of


strength, S < 2, while in the range of S > 2 , which
the Optoelectronics Research Centre at the
is of major interest (see, e.g., Fig. 8), the FS does
Department of Electronics Engineering, the City
not provide any improvement in this respect.
University of Hong Kong.
These results are presented in another useful
form in Fig. 11, which shows, simultaneously, the
values of the DM strength and excess gain, at
which particular curves in Fig. 10 attain a maxi- References
mum of Lcoll , together with the corresponding
[1] E. Iannone, F. Matera, A. Mecozzi, M. Settembre,
maximum of Lcoll itself, as a function of the SF Nonlinear Optical Communication Networks, Wiley,
slope. From this figure too, we conclude that New York, 1998.
making the filters frequency-sliding does not tan- [2] A. Berntson, N.J. Doran, W. Forysiak, J.H.B. Nijhof, Opt.
gibly affect the maximum collision length. Lett. 23 (1998) 900.
[3] T. Lakoba, J. Yang, D.J. Kaup, B.A. Malomed, Opt.
Commun. 149 (1998) 366.
[4] K.I. Suzuki, S. Kawai, K. Iwatsuki, Electron. Lett. 32
4. Conclusion (1996) 2173.
[5] L.F. Mollenauer, P.V. Mamyshev, IEEE J. Quantum
In this work, we have investigated in detail Electron. 34 (1998) 2089;
L.F. Mollenauer, P.V. Mamyshev, J. Gripp, M.J. Neubelt,
dynamical characteristics of DM solitons in the
N. Mamysheva, L. Gruner-Nielsen, T. Veng, Opt. Lett. 25
model where the transmission of pulses is con- (2000) 704.
trolled by lumped frequency-sliding (FS) filters. [6] M. Matsumoto, Opt. Lett. 23 (1998) 1901.
The most fundamental characteristic is the de- [7] M. Matsumoto, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 15 (1998) 2831.
pendence of the solitonÕs peak power vs. the DM [8] A. Berntson, B.A. Malomed, Opt. Lett. 24 (1999) 507.
[9] F. Mollenauer, J.P. Gordon, S.G. Evangelides, Opt. Lett.
map strength. We have produced a comprehensive
17 (1992) 1575.
set of such characteristics for different values of [10] D.E. Pelinovsky, Phys. Rev. E 62 (2000) 4283.
the FS slope and path-average dispersion (PAD, [11] S. Wabnitz, F. Neddam, Opt. Commun. 183 (2000)
which may be anomalous, zero, and normal). 395.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen