Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Abstract— The objective of this paper is to propose a Real-Time and Non-Real-Time applications, it is impor-
N ovel Stall Avoidance Scheme in order to solve the tant that certain quality of service (QoS) targets be met.
”stall” or ”gap” problem in the receiving side reordering
Real-time applications specifically require the delivery of
buffer and to make a comparative study between the
information from the source to the destination within a
conventional scheduling policies in HSDPA downlink for
WCDMA systems employing the Maximum Carrier-to- predefined time in order to satisfy the growing aggressive
Interference (MCI), Round Robin (RR), Proportional demand for the wireless packet data services.
Fair (PF), queue-based exponential rule (QER), and the
proposed Stall Avoidance (SA+QER) scheduling. In this
Packet Stall or ”gap” may occur when one or more
paper, we compare through simulations the performance
packets cannot be forwarded up due to missing packet or
of these schedulers based timer and window schemes with
the proposed scheduler in the presence of packets stalls because of a misinterpretation of an NACK-to-ACK or
within the receiver reordering buffer process. Simulations vice versa. A well-known drawback of stalling is that the
show that in terms of received goodput in upper layer overall system throughput may suffer from severe delay.
and the system overall delay, the proposed stall avoidance
Such delay has a direct impact on user’s satisfaction,
scheduler outperforms all the other schedulers. As result,
because it reduces the applications fidelity, which in
the overall system delay is significantly reduced.
turn causes the user’s frustration. This also affects the
perceived quality of the application by compromising the
Index Terms - Scheduling, HSDPA Stall Avoidance,
integrity of the data to be transmitted or by disrupting
WCDMA systems.
the service.
1
II. BACKGROUND AND RELATED WORK 0.9
0.3
0.1
0.7
0.5
0
We employed the fast packet scheduling based 6- 0 10 20 30
5
User throughput (10 bps)
40 50