Sie sind auf Seite 1von 30

R3: December 16, 2010

Nuclear Emergency Preparedness & Response


in
Japan

Nuclear Emergency Preparedness Support Division

Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization (JNES)

1
R3: December 16, 2010

Nuclear Emergency Preparedness & Response in Japan

Contents

Introduction

Chapter 1. System of Nuclear Emergency Preparedness and Response in

Japan
1) Basic Act for Emergency Preparedness
2) Basic Plan for Emergency Preparedness
3) Special Act of Emergency Preparedness for Nuclear Disaster
4) Regional Disaster Prevention Plan
5) Emergency Preparedness and Response at Nuclear Facilities (Emergency
Preparedness and Response Guidelines)

Chapter 2. Special Act of Emergency Preparedness for Nuclear Disaster


1) Establishment of the Act
2) Special features of the Act
3) System of Senior Specialists for Nuclear Emergency
4) Designation of Nuclear Emergency Response Operations Facility (Off-Site
Center)
5) Nuclear emergency response exercises

Chapter 3. Nuclear Emergency Response Operations Facility (Off-Site

Center)
1) Purpose of Off-Site Center
2) Equipment in Off-Site Center
3) Emergency Response Support System (ERSS)
4) System for Prediction of Environmental Emergency Dose Information
(SPEEDI)

Chapter 4. Nuclear Emergency Response Drills and Exercises

2
R3: December 16, 2010

Introduction

In Japan suff icient consideration has been given to nuclear emergency

preparedness from the beginning of the development and utilization of

nuclear energy.

Especially, since the establishment of the “Basic Act for Emergency

Preparedness”, we have prepared for nuclear emergencies by identifying

nuclear emergencies as identical as the natural disasters such as typhoons,

earthquakes, thereby placing emergency preparedness and equipment in

place.

We have experienced, however, various accidents and incidents in

nuclear power facilities in Japan as well as in the world during a long period

of time from the development to utilization of nuclear energy.

Especially, the accident at the Three Mile Island (TMI) Nuclear Power

Plant in the U.S.A. in 1979, the accident at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power

Plant in the former Soviet Union in 1986, and the criticality accident at a

uranium-processing plant at Tokai-mura in Japan in 1999 made extremely

strong impacts on the arrangements and approaches to the nuclear

emergency preparedness in many countries at the time when each of the

accidents happened.

In Japan the nuclear emergency preparedness has been strengthened by

reflecting lessons learned from the experiences of these accidents or

incidents upon the related Acts and guidelines. In particular the lessons

learned from the criticality accident at the uranium-processing plant in

Tokai-mura have marked a great turning point for the nuclear emergency

preparedness, resulting in the establishment of “Special Act of Emergency

3
R3: December 16, 2010

Preparedness for Nuclear Disaster” dedicated for nuclear emergencies under

the Basic Act for Emergency Preparedness.

In what follows, the outline of nuclear emergency preparedness and

response in Japan is described.

4
R3: December 16, 2010

Chapter 1.

System of Nuclear Emergency Preparedness and Response in Japan

1) Basic Act for Emergency Preparedness

All emergency responses in Japan are implemented under the Basic Act

for Emergency Preparedness. The Act was established in 1961 stemmed from

the experience of Ise Bay Typhoon in 1959 which caused many dead and

missing people. Since then this Act has become an act which deals with all

disasters including natural ones in Japan.

The Basic Act for Emergency Preparedness aims at preparing and

promoting comprehensive administration in emergency preparedness and

response to protect our homeland and the public from disasters. To this

and, the Act requires that public authorities should establish necessary

arrangements, clarify where the responsibility lies, and establish

fundamentals needed for emergencies.

This Act, therefore, applies to human-caused disasters such as nuclear

emergencies, railway disasters, and accidental disasters (such as airplane

disasters), as well as seismic disasters (earthquakes), storm and flood

disasters, volcanic disasters, marine disasters, and snow damage. Since this

Act has been applicable to nuclear emergencies, the responsibility for

nuclear preparedness and response has become clear, and the organizational

arrangements for nuclear emergencies have been reinforced.

Since the enactment of the Act, it has undergone several revisions

reflecting lessons learned from actual disasters.

2) Basic Plan for Emergency Preparedness

5
R3: December 16, 2010

The “Basic Plan for Emergency Preparedness,” which is a basic plan for

emergency preparedness and response in Japan, was prepared by the

National Disaster Prevention Council whose Director General is the Prime

Minister in accordance with the Basic Act for Emergency Preparedness.

This basic plan was prepared in 1963 and was partially revised in 1971.

The Act was revised mainly on natural disaster measures in July 1995 based

on the experiences and lessons learned in the Great Hanshin-Awaji

Earthquake that had caused large-scale casualties.

Furthermore, the Act was revised to enhance emergency preparedness for

accidental disasters in June 1997 in response to potential sophistication,

complication and diversif ication in the society and the industry.

The basic plan is composed of the following volumes for easy

identif ication to permit people to of the measures to be taken depending on

disasters. The nuclear emergency preparedness is shown in Volume 10.

Volume 1. General provisions

Volume 2. Earthquake disaster preparedness

Volume 3. Storm and flood disaster preparedness

Volume 4. Volcanic disaster preparedness

Volume 5. Snow damage preparedness

Volume 6. Marine disaster preparedness

Volume 7. Aircraft disaster preparedness

Volume 8. Railway disaster preparedness

Volume 9. Road disaster preparedness

Volume 10. Nuclear emergency preparedness

6
R3: December 16, 2010

Volume 11. Dangerous material disaster preparedness

Volume 12. Great f ire disaster preparedness

Volume 13. Forest f ire disaster preparedness

Volume 14. Preparedness common to other disasters

Volume 15. Important matters in emergency preparedness plans and

local emergency planning

Volume 10 “Nuclear emergency preparedness” was revised in May 2000

to include processing facilities, storage facilities, waste facilities, and

transportation in addition to the conventional nuclear power plants and

reprocessing facilities in accordance with the Special Act of Emergency

Preparedness for Nuclear Disaster. This Act was established in response to

the criticality accident at the uranium-processing plant occurred in

Tokai-mura, Ibaraki Prefecture, in September 1999. The volume was also

revised to reflect the administrative reform in January 2001.

Furthermore, the volumes on storm and flood disaster planning and the

nuclear emergency planning, were revised in April 2002 to enhance the

effectiveness of the plans to reflect the state-of-the-art in preparedness and

response. The nuclear emergency preparedness planning was revised to

include the preparedness, for nuclear-powered ships and modif ications

involving the emergency medical care to exposed persons.

In March 2004, necessary revisions were made mainly on the volume of

earthquake disaster preparedness to reflect the state-of-the-art in

earthquake preparedness and response.

The Volume 10 is composed of the following:

7
R3: December 16, 2010

Chapter 1. Disaster prevention

Section 1. Ensuring safety of facilities

Section 2. Preparedness for swift and smooth implementation of

emergency response and recovery from disasters

Section 3. Dissemination of emergency preparedness

Section 4. Promotion of research on nuclear emergency

preparedness and response

Section 5. Implementation of prevention for recurrence

Section 6. Preparedness for swift and smooth implementation of

emergency response for accidents during transportation

of nuclear fuel materials outside the plants

Chapter 2. Emergency response

Section 1. Collection and communication of information, and

securing of emergency communication systems and

communication means

Section 2. Establishment of response alignment

Section 3. Protective operations such as sheltering and evacuation

Section 4. Maintenance of the social order including prevention of

crimes

Section 5. Securing of transportation means for emergency

transportation, and emergency transportation

Section 6. Rescue and f irst aid, medical care and f ire f ighting

Section 7. Accurate information transmission to related persons

Section 8. Preparedness for swift and smooth implementation of

8
R3: December 16, 2010

emergency response for accidents during transportation

of nuclear fuel materials outside the plants

Chapter 3. Recovery from disasters

Chapter 4. Nuclear emergency preparedness in nuclear-powered vessels

3) Special Act of Emergency Preparedness for Nuclear Disaster

Actions taken for nuclear emergencies are the same those of other

disasters under the Basic Act for Emergency Preparedness. However, for

nuclear emergencies which release a large amount of radioactive material,

the following response actions are needed due to the peculiarity in the

nuclear emergency.

- Swift and wide-area measures should be taken against radioactive

contamination which cannot be felt by the f ive senses.

- Special drills and equipment and expert advices are needed to

effectively implement the emergency response.

- The responsibility of licensees should be clarif ied who cause

accidents and know well about the subject facility.

On the other hand, the criticality accident occurred at the

uranium-processing plant in Tokai-mura on September 30, 1999 was the

worst case in the history of nuclear power in Japan, and the following

lessons were learned from the response activities:

- Necessity for strengthening the cooperation between the national

and local governments in the initial activation.

- Necessity for enhancing the emergency response arrangements in

9
R3: December 16, 2010

the national government which conform to the peculiarity of the

nuclear emergency.

- Necessity for clarifying the licensee’s responsibility in the

emergency response.

The Special Act of Emergency Preparedness for Nuclear Disaster was

enacted in order to reflect these lessons upon the nuclear emergency

preparedness and response, and was put into effect in June 2000. The

details of the Act are described in Chapter 2.

4) Local emergency planning

Individual local governments are responsible for ensuring the safety of

local residents and are required to develop their individual overall local

emergency planning, which is suitable for their respective districts under the

Basic Act for Emergency Preparedness.

The prefectural governments are required to develop their own local

emergency planning in consultation with the Prime Minister under Article 40

of the Basic Act for Emergency Preparedness. The municipal governments

are also required to develop their own emergency planning in consultation

with the prefectural governors under Article 42 of the Basic Act for

Emergency Preparedness.

5) Emergency preparedness and response in nuclear facilities (Emergency

preparedness and response guidelines)

In Volume 10 of the Basic Plan for Emergency Preparedness which is set

up by the Central Emergency Preparedness Council (CDPC), it is described

10
R3: December 16, 2010

that professional and technical matters should fully respect the “Emergency

preparedness and response in nuclear facilities” (Emergency preparedness

and response guidelines) specif ied by the Nuclear Safety Commission (NSC).

In the wake of the accident at the Three Mile Island (TMI) Nuclear Power

Plant in the U.S.A. in 1979, the nuclear emergency guidelines were compiled

considering the phenomena peculiar to nuclear emergencies. In the nuclear

emergency guidelines, basic principles for professional and technical

matters in the nuclear emergency preparedness such as the forms of

radioactive materials, environmental radiation monitoring during emergency

and protective measures for residents in the vicinity of the facility are

described.

These are as follows:

- General nuclear emergency preparedness and response

- Emergency planning zones (EPZ) where the nuclear emergency

preparedness and response is intensively implemented.

- Environmental radiation monitoring during emergency

- Notif ication criteria and judgment criteria for emergency

- Protective measures

- Emergency medical care to exposed persons

The relationship between the Acts and the emergency planning mentioned

above is shown in Fig. 1-1.

11
R3: December 16, 2010

Basic Act for Energy Praparedness (November 15, 1961)

Organizations for emergency response (including Special Act of Emergency


the Central Emergency Preparedness Council and Preparedness for Nuclear Disaster
Emergency Response Headquarters), emergency (December 17, 1999)
planning, disaster prevention, emergency response In the wake of the JCO accident
and recovery from disasters. (There is no description occurred in 1999, this law was
specified for nuclear emergency preparedness established as a special one for the
and response.) Basic Act on Emergency Preparedness.
This special Act provides:
National government: Basic Plan - Responsibilities of licensees,
for Emergency Preparedness national government, and local
governments
This is a basic plan of Japan for emergency - Development of a nuclear emergency
preparedness and response developed by the response plan by the licensee
Central Emergency Preparedness Council under - Criteria to judge the occurrence of
Article 34 of the Basic Law on Emergency nuclear emergency
Preparedness. Measures are stipulated - Nuclear Emergency Response
depending on disasters. Headquarters
- Emergency Response Operations
The Volume 10 provides “nuclear emergency
Facility
preparedness.”
This Volume provides that professional and
technical matters should fully respect the
“Emergency preparedness and response in Directives of
nuclear facilities” (Emergency preparedness revision Nuclear licensee emergency
guidelines) specified by the Nuclear Safety response plan
Commission (NSC). Notification (Plan under Article 7 of SLNE)
Furthermore, this Volume provides that the to the
following concrete and special technical matters competent
should be based on the guidelines specified by minister Consultation with the
NSC: prefectural governor and
- Emergency planning zones (EPZ) where the the heads of the municipal
nuclear emergency preparedness and response governments where the
is intensively implemented. nuclear facility is located
- Emergency monitoring plans of local
governments
- Exposure protection for persons involved in
emergency response work
- Indoor sheltering and evacuation directives
by the Prime Minister
- Preventive administration of an iodine
prophy laxis
- Setting of the limit to an intake of food and Consultation with
drink the heads of
municipalities
surrounding the
Prefecture: local emergency nuclear facility
Consultation planning
with the (Plan under Article 40 of SLNE)
Prime Minister
Report to
the Prime Minister Municipal governments: local
Consultation emergency planning
Emergency response plan of the with the (Plan under Article 42 of BLNP)
designated administrative body governor
(Plan under Article 36 of BLNP)

Fig. 1-1. Relationship between the Acts and the emergency planning

12
R3: December 16, 2010

Chapter 2.

Special Act of Emergency Preparedness for Nuclear Disas ter

1) History

In Japan, the nuclear emergency preparedness had been carried out in

accordance with “the Basic Act for Emergency Preparedness.” In December

1999, the Special Act of Emergency Preparedness for Nuclear Disaster was

established as a special Act. This Act was prepared based on the lessons

learned from the criticality accident (JCO accident) occurred at the

uranium-processing plant in Tokai-mura, Ibaraki Prefecture on September 30,

1999, which was the worst one in the history of Japanese nuclear development.

This special Act was put into effect in June 2000.

2) Features of the Special Act of Emergency Preparedness for Nuclear Disaster

The Act was prepared based on the lessons learned from the JCO accident,

and key features of which are as follows:

(1) Swift initial action

- Obligation of the licensee to notify abnormal events to the regulatory

authority.

- Setting up of “Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters” whose

Director General is the Prime Minister (deputy director general is the

Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry) immediately after a nuclear

emergency event has taken place.

(2) Organic cooperation between the national government and the local

government

- Setting up of a “local nuclear emergency response headquarters.”

13
R3: December 16, 2010

- Setting up of a “joint council for nuclear emergency” at the “Nuclear

Emergency Response Operations Facility (Off-Site Center).” This aims at

enhancing the cooperation between local governments and the national

government.

- Implementation of nuclear emergency response exercises at the plant

sites.

(3) Reinforcement of the emergency communications system of the national

government.

- Residential stationing of senior specialists for nuclear emergency.

- Designation of Off-Site Centers by the Minister of Economy, Trade and

Industry.

- Swift supply of various functions required in the nuclear emergency.

(4) Clarif ication of responsibility of nuclear licensees

- Obligation of the licensee to develop and notify its emergency preparedness

and response plan to NISA.

- Obligation of the licensee to station its nuclear emergency response manager

at the site.

3) System of senior specialists for nuclear emergency

The Special Act of Emergency Preparedness for Nuclear Disaster requires

the stationing of senior specialists for nuclear emergency in the areas where

nuclear power stations are located, and imposes the following duties.

(1) Duties during routine operations

- Direction and advice to the licensee on the licensee’s emergency

preparedness and response plan, and conf irmation of the location,

14
R3: December 16, 2010

maintenance and check of emergency equipment and materials.

- Advices to the local governments on the emergency planning.

- Maintenance of equipment at the Off-Site Center.

- Planning, coordinating and implementing of nuclear emergency drills.

- Promotion of nuclear emergency awareness brief ing to local residents.

(2) Duties during a nuclear emergency

- Grasping of plant status

- Activation of the Off-Site Center

- Information collection concerning the response activities of the licensee and

organizations concerned

- Explanation and advice to local governments

(3) Activities after nuclear emergency

4) Designation of Nuclear Emergency Response Operations Facility (Off-Site

Center)

The Special Act of Emergency Preparedness for Nuclear Disaster requires to

designate the Nuclear Emergency Response Operations Facility (Off-Site

Center) at each of the nuclear facilities. This Off-Site Center is designated by

the competent agency for the subject nuclear facility.

Namely, the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) designates

Off-Site Centers for nuclear facilities (nuclear power plant, reprocessing facility,

processing facility, storage facility, and waste facility) other than research

reactors, and the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and

Technology (MEXT) designate Off-Site Centers for research reactors.

Accordingly, if there are research reactors and other nuclear facilities in the

15
R3: December 16, 2010

same area, both METI and MEXT share the same Off-Site Center in the area.

When a nuclear emergency occurs, the nuclear emergency response

headquarters is set up in the national government (the Prime Minister’s Off icial

Residence), and the local nuclear emergency response headquarters which

carries out some of the practical work of the nuclear emergency response

headquarters is set up at the Off-Site Center. Both headquarters closely work

together and respond the emergency.

Chapter 3 elaborates the Off-Site Center.

5) Implementation of nuclear emergency response exercise

The Special Act of Nuclear Emergency requires for the national government,

local governments and the licensee to implement a nuclear emergency response

exercise every year.

Thereby the national government selects an area where a nuclear facility is

located, and implements a full-scale nuclear emergency response exercise

together with the organizations concerned and the licensee in cooperation with

local residents.

16
R3: December 16, 2010

Chapter 3.

Nuclear Emergency Response Operations Facility (Off-Site Center)

1) Purpose of the Off-Site Center

When a nuclear accident occurs, various emergency response actions are

needed at the site, in which emergency responses by the licensee, the grasping

and prediction of accident status the ensuring of residence safety, medical

treatment to exposed persons, and support for evacuated residents. These

response activities must be implemented in unison by the organizations

concerned and specialists including the related competent agencies of the

national government, the local governments and the licensee.

For this purpose, all responders should meet together, share information,

and coordinate instructions. The Off-Site Center was established to serve as an

operations center at the time of nuclear emergency.

When a nuclear emergency occurs, the nuclear emergency response

headquarters is set up in the national government (the Prime Minister’s Off icial

Residence), and the local nuclear emergency response headquarters of the

national government which carries out some of the practical work of the nuclear

emergency response headquarters is set up in the Off-Site Center. Also, a joint

council for nuclear emergency response is organized in the Off-Site Center, for

the organizations concerned and personnel to share information.

Seven functional teams are set up as working units in the joint council;

these are coordination team, public relations team, plant team, radiation team,

medical care team, resident safety team, and operations support team. These

teams collect and analyze the information of their respective f ields at the

Off-Site Center, and act as hands and feet of the joint council response.

17
R3: December 16, 2010

At present, 22 Off-Site Centers are designated in the prefectures where

nuclear facilities are located.

The locations of Off-Site Centers are shown in Fig. 3-1.

18
R3: December 16, 2010

Fig. 3-1. Locations of Off-Site Centers

19
R3: December 16, 2010

2) Equipment at Off-Site Center

The Off-Site Center is equipped with various devices to fulf ill its purpose as

follows:

- Image display system

A large-size image display device is provided to allow participants to share

information in plenary meetings. The screen can display terminal screens

of individual systems such as Video conferences, ERSS, and SPEEDI.

- Video conference system

The Off-Site Center, the nuclear emergency response headquarters (the

Prime Minister’s Off icial Residence), the Emergency Response Center

(Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency), and local governments are

connected by a Video Conference System.

- Emergency Response Support System (ERSS)

Information on the plant state and the environment of its vicinity is

displayed. Persons concerned can know the plant state and predict the

progress of the accident. (Details are described below.)

- System for Prediction of Environmental Emergency Dose Information

(SPEEDI)

This system predicts the atmospheric concentration of radioactive

materials and exposure doses in the vicinity of the plant using the

information on the release sources at the nuclear plant and

meteorological conditions. (Details are described below.)

- Radiation monitoring system

This system displays the radiation monitoring data measured by the local

government and the nuclear licensee.

20
R3: December 16, 2010

- Weather information system

This system displays or predicts weather information (the latest weather,

wind direction, wind speed, etc.) transmitted by the Japan Weather

Association.

- LAN equipment (personal computers and printers)

This equipment connects the personal computers and printers between

the Off-Site Center including the related bodies concerned and the

Emergency Response Center (Nuclear Industrial and Safety Agency) by

LAN.

- Communications equipment including telephones and facsimiles

This equipment connects the Off-Site Center with the places concerned by

telephones and facsimiles by using public circuit, dedicated circuit, and

satellite circuit.

- Satellite communications system

This system is provided as a backup one when the terrestrial channel

cannot be used.

- Materials and equipment

Measuring instruments including pocket dose meters and survey meters,

masks, protective clothes, and others are provided to support the

activities of personnel at the Off-Site Center.

The appearance inside the Off-Site Center is shown in Fig. 3-2. The chart

above shows the area where the joint council for nuclear emergency response is

established, and the chart below indicates the place where each function team

is deployed.

21
R3: December 16, 2010

Fig. 3-2. Equipment of Off-Site Center

3) Emergency Response Support System (ERSS)

22
R3: December 16, 2010

If an accident occurred, at a nuclear power plant, the licensee is primarily

responsible for judging the plant state and predicting the progress for the

accident. ERSS monitors the state of the accident using the information sent by

the licensee to ERSS, judges the state of the accident based on its specialized

knowledge base, and analyzes and predicts the subsequent development of the

accident.

This information is used for supporting the emergency response by the

national government.

ERSS consists of “Information Collection System (ICS),” “Plant Information

Display System,” “Diagnosis/Prognosis Support System (DPS),” “Analytical

Prediction System (APS),” and “ERSS Display System.”

- Information Collection System

If an accident occurred at a nuclear power plant, which leads or may lead

to a nuclear emergency, the licensee transmits accident information

including the plant state and monitored radiation levels at the plant to

METI. The “Information Collection System” receives and stores this

information.

- Plant Information Display System

The received and stored data are displayed as monitored information on

the screen of the “Plant Information Display System.”

- Accident state judgment support system

This system judges the state of the accident based on the information

transmitted and specialized knowledge base, and displays it on the

screen.

- Diagnosis/Prognosis Support System

23
R3: December 16, 2010

This system analyzes the progress of the accident based on the accident

information transmitted, and displays the results on the screen.

Fig. 3-3 shows a schematic of the ERSS.

24
R3: December 16, 2010

METI
Emergency Response Center
Off-Site Center

Nuclear Power
Plant ICS Display ICS Display DPS/APS
Plant information Display
collection system (ICS)
ICS display
Control Room

ICS display

Diagnosis/Prognosis Analytical
Plant Instruments ICS Display Support System Prediction DPS/APS display
(DPS) System (APS)

Fig. 3-3. Schematic of ERSS

25
R3: December 16, 2010

4) System for Prediction of Environmental Emergency Dose Information (SPEEDI)

The SPEEDI network system swiftly predicts the concentration of radioactive materials

in the atmosphere and exposed doses in the peripheral environment based on the released

source information, meteorological conditions and geographical data in the case of an

emergency when a large amount of radioactive material is or may be released from nuclear

facilities.

The SPEEDI network system is connected to the competent agency, NSC, Off-Site

Centers, and local governments by dedicated lines. The information predicted by this

network system enables the national government and local governments to swiftly take

protective measures for residents in the vicinity of the nuclear facility.

During normal times, the national information-processing calculator always collects

meteorological data and environmental radiation observation data from the telemeter

systems of local governments, GPV (Grid Point Value) data from the Japan Weather

Association, and AMeDAS (Automated Meteorological Data Acquisition System) data via the

communication network. During an emergency, local weather prediction data are produced

based on the collected meteorological data and geographical data reflecting the influence of

geographical features at the site of the nuclear facilities, as well as using the land utilization

data. Furthermore, the wind field, atmospheric concentration and dose are calculated using

the local weather prediction data and the information of the released sources at the site of

the nuclear facility.

These analysis results are provided in identifiable drawings to the national

government and local governments.

The examples of output figures from the SPEEDI are shown in Fig. 3-4.

26
R3: December 16, 2010

This figure shows a six-hour integrated


value of external exposure.

The isopleth line shows an


Effective dose of external exposure Location and value where effective dose. The opening
(Rare gas) the maximum dose is between the maximum value
An integrated value of the date: predicted (the symbol on and minimum value in the
2004/07/22 10:00 – 2004.07/22 16:00 the map*) isopleth line is 102.
Weather data: observed value
Nuclear species’ name: rare gas
Targeted age: adults
Effective dose isopleth line (mSv)
1 = 1.00 x 10
2 = 5.00 x 10
3 = 1.00 x 10
Maxim dose point
4 = 5.00 x 10
5 = 1.00 x 10

Maximum dose = 1.00 x 10-16 mSv


From the release point (0.1, -0.1) km

Size of
Calculation model name = PRWDA21
calculation
Use model name = normal model

Calculation Condition

Calculation mesh width:


horizontal direction = 0.25 km

Released amount = 615 m


Burnup = 200 x 104 MWD/MTU
Reactor shutdown time = 2004. 07/22 10:00
Release start time = 2004. 07/22 10:00

Release mode = unit amount release


Released nuclear species and release rate
Rare gas: 1.00 x 102 Bq/h

Release mode: unit amount release


・The released amount is calculated by
a constant release rate during release,
and corrected by attenuation.

Fig. 3-4. An example of figure output by SPEEDI


(Effective dose of external exposure (Rare gas))

27
R3: December 16, 2010

Chapter 4.

Nuclear Emergency Response Drills and Exercises

The Special Act of Emergency Preparedness for Nuclear Disaster provides that the

national government should develop nuclear emergency response exercise plans and

implement the exercise in cooperation with the organizations concerned.

For this purpose, METI and MEXT develop their joint exercise plans, and implement

a full-scale exercise by setting up and operating the nuclear emergency response

headquarters assigning the Prime Minister as Director General in cooperation with the

national government, local governments, designated public institutes, and nuclear

licensees.

The full-scale exercises were implemented at the following nuclear facilities so far:

Exercise date Prefecture Nuclear facility implemented

1 2000/03/23 Fukui Prefecture Tsuruga Nuclear Power Plant


(The Japan Atomic Power Co.)
2 2000/10/28 Shimane Prefecture Shimane Nuclear Power Plant
(The Chugoku Electric Power
Co.)
3 2001/10/27 Hokkaido Tomari Power Plant (Hokkaido
Electric Power Co.)
4 2002/11/27 Fukui Prefecture Ohi Power Plant (The Kansai
Electric Power Co.)
5 2003/11/26 Saga Prefecture Genkai Nuclear Power Plant
(Kyushu Electric Power Co.)
6 2005/11/9,10 Niigata Prefecture Kashiwazaki Kariwa Nuclear
Power Plant (The Tokyo
Electric Power Co.

28
R3: December 16, 2010

These full-scale nuclear emergency response exercises were extremely large in

scale from the points of the number of participating organizations and participants. For

example, seventy-four organizations participated in the exercise at the

Kashiwazak-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant in 2005, and the number of participants was as

many as 2,600. Four hundred local residents also participated in this exercise.

Fig. 4-1 shows how the full-scale nuclear emergency response exercise was

implemented in the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant in Niigata Prefecture in

2005.

In this figure, the upper photo shows how the joint council for emergency response

looks, and the lower photo shows how the measurement of the contamination of

residents was going on in an evacuation facility.

29
R3: December 16, 2010

Fig. 4-1. Full-scale nuclear emergency response exercise in 2005


(Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant in Niigata Prefecture)

30

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen