Voice-over-IP Performance in UTRA Long

Term Evolution Downlink

Jani Puttonen1, Tero Henttonen2, Niko Kolehmainen3, Kennett Aschan2,
Martti Moisio2 and Petteri Kela3
1
Magister Solutions Ltd, c/o Mattilanniemi 6-8,
40101 Jyväskylä, Finland. Email: firstname.lastname@magister.fi
2
Nokia, P.O.BOX 45, FIN-00045 Nokia Group, Finland
Email: firstname.lastname@nokia.com
3
University of Jyväskylä, Dept. of Mathematical Information Technology
P.O. Box 35, 40014 University of Jyväskylä, Finland. Email: firstname.lastname@jyu.fi

packets transmitted quite rarely. The Adaptive Multi-Rate

Abstract—In this paper, we study Voice-over-IP (VoIP)
performance in UTRA Long Term Evolution (LTE) Downlink
(DL). We have utilized fully dynamic system simulations to study
the VoIP Adaptive Multi-Rate (AMR) 12.2 codec capacity in four
different 3GPP simulation cases. The effects of Link Adaptation
(LA), packet bundling, control channel capacity and number of
HARQ processes on VoIP capacity have also been considered.
The results present the absolute VoIP capacity numbers of LTE
DL. We also show that LA together with packet bundling
provides clear gain on the VoIP capacity, because more VoIP
packets can be scheduled in each TTI. Also, the control channel
limitations can be effectively compensated by packet bundling.
Index Terms—VoIP, LTE, system simulations
I. INTRODUCTION
The Evolved UTRAN (E-UTRAN) or the UTRAN Long
Term Evolution (LTE) specifications are being finalized in
3GPP. LTE aims at ambitious goals of e.g. peak data rate of
100 Mbps in downlink and 50 Mbps in uplink, increased cell
edge user throughput, improved spectral efficiency, scalable
bandwidth from 1.25 MHz to 20 MHz, etc. [1].
The main principles of E-UTRA downlink, uplink and the
core network have been decided already. LTE supports both
time (TDD) and frequency division duplex (FDD) modes, but
in this article we concentrate on FDD. Orthogonal Frequency
Division Multiple Access (OFDMA) has been selected for the
downlink multiple access technology and Single Carrier
Frequency Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA) for uplink
[1]. To achieve the objectives set for LTE, advanced Radio
Resource Management (RRM) functions have been defined.
The algorithms include e.g. Hybrid ARQ (HARQ), Link
Adaptation (LA), Channel Quality Indication (CQI) and
Packet Scheduling (PS). More on these can be found e.g. from
[2].
E-UTRAN is optimized for packet data transfer and the
core network is purely packet switched, so speech is
transmitted purely with Voice-over-IP (VoIP). VoIP traffic
consists of talk-spurts and silent periods, with relatively small
(AMR) codec provides quite bursty traffic; one VoIP packet at
20 ms intervals during talk spurt and one Silence Indicator
(SID) packet at 160 ms intervals during silence period. E-
UTRAN is expected to support a very high number of VoIP
users and the Quality-of-Service (QoS) for VoIP is determined
by maximum End-to-End delay and tolerable packet loss.
These facts set challenges to the resource allocation of VoIP
users, for both PS and LA algorithms. Also, the capacity of
Physical Downlink Control Channel (PDCCH) induces some
restrictions, at least with higher system bandwidths. These
restrictions become most relevant with dynamic packet
scheduling, since each allocation consumes signaling
resources from PDCCH. Thus, several persistent resource
allocation schemes, such as fully persistent scheduling, talk-
spurt based persistent scheduling and semi-persistent
scheduling have also been proposed in 3GPP [3]. However,
these scheduling types limit the gain from multi-user and
frequency domain scheduling. VoIP service in E-UTRAN has
been studied e.g. in [4] and [5].
The objective of this article is to provide the baseline VoIP
performance results of E-UTRAN FDD downlink with
dynamic packet scheduling. The effect of different features,
such as system bandwidth, LA, Control Channel (CC)
capacity, packet bundling and HARQ processes, on VoIP
capacity are studied using simulations. The simulation results
are gathered from fully dynamic system simulator, which
models the UE mobility, RRM functionalities and their
interactions with the system.
The paper is organised as follows: Chapter II discusses the
general aspects of VoIP in LTE and related modeling. Chapter
III lists the simulation assumptions including a short
description of the simulator. Chapter IV presents the
simulation results and analysis. Finally, Chapter V reviews the
main conclusions.

978-1-4244-1645-5/08/$25.00 ©2008 IEEE 2502

 II. VOICE-OVER-IP IN LTE
VoIP has at least three characteristics that need
consideration in LTE (as well as in any wireless system):
Bursty low bitrate traffic, strict packet delay-based QoS and
high number of simultaneous users). These issues set
challenges to the RRM functions. Next, we discuss these
characteristics as well as the required RRM functions in more
detail.
A. High Capacity Demand
The requirements of E-UTRA and E-UTRAN are described
in TR.25.813 [6]. The service related requirements for VoIP
are:
• The E-UTRA should efficiently support various types
of service. These must include currently available
services like web-browsing, FTP, video-streaming or
VoIP, and more advanced services (e.g. real-time video
or push-to-talk) in the Packet Switched domain.
• VoIP should be supported with at least as good radio
backhaul efficiency and latency as voice over UMTS
Circuit Switched (CS) networks.
• Voice and other real-time services supported in the CS
domain in Release 6 shall be supported by E-UTRAN
via the packet switched domain with at least equal
quality as supported by UTRAN (e.g. in terms of
guaranteed bit rate) - over the whole speed range.
B. Strict packet delay-based QoS
The system capacity for VoIP service is limited by the
outage limits defined in TR 25.814 [1] and updated in 3GPP
contribution R1-070674 [7]:
• The system capacity is defined as the number of users
in a cell when more than 95% of the users are satisfied
• A single VoIP user is in outage if less than 98% of its
speech frames are delivered successfully within 50 ms
air interface delay.
According to [8], the maximum acceptable mouth-to-ear
delay for voice is on the order of 250 ms. Assuming that the
delay for Core Network is approximately 100 ms, the tolerable
delay for Radio Link Control (RLC) and Medium Access
Control (MAC) buffering, scheduling and detection should be
strictly lower than 150 ms. Hence, assuming that both end
users are E-UTRAN users, tolerable delay for buffering and
scheduling is lower than 80 ms. A delay bound of 50 ms (for
delay from eNB to UE) has been chosen for the 3GPP
performance evaluations to better account for variability in
network end-to-end delays.
C. Bursty low bitrate traffic
In the context of this article, we consider VoIP traffic as
provided by AMR codec. The AMR VoIP traffic is quite
bursty: There’s one VoIP packet at 20 ms intervals during talk
spurt and one SID packet at 160 ms intervals during silence
period. Thus, for any given TTI, only few of the active users
need to be scheduled. At the same time, each unscheduled user
contributes to a backlog of scheduling requests for later TTIs.
2503
Since this backlog can start accumulating easily, leading to
resource stalling for several users, scheduling should take care
that the buffering delay of each VoIP user is taken into
account in the scheduling decisions.
Since VoIP packets are relatively small (regardless of the
used AMR codec), there are some challenges in allocating the
resources; 2-4 symbols of each carrier in each Physical
Resource Block (PRB) are reserved for control data (reference
symbols, allocation information, HARQ ACK/NACK
channels), depending on the need for allocation signaling.
With the demand for several users to be scheduled
simultaneously, the control channel capacity might become a
limit for the VoIP capacity due to lack of signaling bits.
D. Packet scheduling and link adaptation
Since VoIP is strictly delay-restricted service, the PS needs
to take the buffering delay of UEs into account. As presented
in e.g. [9], dynamic packet scheduling provides good
frequency domain and multi-user gain for best effort type
traffic. However, because of the VoIP service characteristics
discussed before, several persistent type scheduling algorithms
(such as fully persistent, talk-spurt based persistent and semi-
persistent scheduling) have been proposed in 3GPP. These
scheduling mechanisms limit or even lack entirely the gain
from multi-user and frequency domain scheduling, but work
around a difficult problem of the PDCCH capacity restricting
the overall VoIP capacity. However, also dynamic PS may be
improved for improving the VoIP capacity with control
channel restrictions. With packet bundling the eNb may decide
to bundle one or more VoIP packets into one L1 PDU
improving the spectral efficiency together with LA due to
better resource utilization.
E. Handovers and mobility
E-UTRAN utilizes a UE assisted hard handover algorithm
for mobility: UE measures downlink signal quality and sends
the measurement reports to eNB either periodically or when an
event triggers.(such as another eNB becoming stronger than
tha current eNB). The eNB then makes the final handover
decisions based on the received measurement reports.
Typically, measurement averaging, handover margins and
timers are used in order to avoid excess or ping-pong
handovers.
During a handover the old serving eNB flushes HARQ
Stop-and-Wait (SAW) buffers, which means that VoIP
packets still waiting for a retransmission will be discarded
permanently. Also, a UE cannot be scheduled while the
handover is in progress, which may lead to additional delays
for PDUs. After a connection to the new eNB is established
both HARQ and PS processed continue normally.
 C. Simulation cases
III. SIMULATION ASSUMPTIONS AND MODELING
The VoIP capacity depends on several different features,
such as:
A. System simulator description 1. Bandwidth: The used system bandwidth determines
the total amount of frequency domain resources
We have used a fully dynamic system simulator for 2. Link adaptation: With LA each TB can be optimized
studying the VoIP performance. Both E-UTRAN downlink in terms of spectral efficiency and BLER.
and uplink are simulated with TTI (1 ms) resolution. 3. Delay threshold: Since VoIP is delay-critical service
Simulator contains detailed modeling of RRM, mobility and determined by the delay threshold.
handovers as well as traffic models. Exponential Effective 4. Number of control channels: The number of
SINR Mapping (EESM) interface is used as link-to-system maximum schedulable users in a TTI depends on the
interface [10]. control channel capacity.
5. Packet bundling: The amount of VoIP packets
B. Scenario setup and related modeling
bundled per UE L1 PDU may improve the resource
The VoIP capacity evaluation is based on the UTRAN LTE utilization, especially with control channel limitations.
downlink parameters and assumptions described in [1]. All the 6. HARQ processes: LTE requires small round trip
simulation cases were run in a three tier diamond-pattern times, which is provided by fast L1 retransmissions by
macro scenario with 19 3-sector sites, i.e. a total amount of 57 HARQ.
cells. Users are uniformly dropped and move within the 21
cells in the middle. The 26 cells at the edge of the scenario are TABLE II. COMMON PARAMETERS.
just generating interference at the same magnitude as the
average load in the center cells. The VoIP capacities are Parameter description Parameter value
presented in all 3GPP defined macro simulation cases shown Scenario / network / direction 57 cells, Synchronous
in TABLE I [1]. Note, that Cases 1, 2 and 3 are modified to reuse 1 network, DL
have only 5 MHz bandwidth. UE velocity 3 km/h
TABLE I. 3GPP SIMULATION CASE DEFINITIONS. UE receiver type MRC 1x2
Channel model TU 20
Case CF ISD BW PLoss Speed Simulation length 1M steps = 72
(GHz) (m) (MHz) (dB) (kmph) seconds
1 2.0 500 5.0 20 3
Symbols per subframe 14 (with 4
2 2.0 500 5.0 10 30
control
3 2.0 1732 5.0 20 3 symbols)
4 0.9 1000 1.25 10 3
Subframe length (TTI) 1 ms
A set of common parameters for the simulations is Carriers per PRB 12
presented in TABLE II. We utilize a de-coupled Time Domain Duplexing FDD
(TD) and Frequency Domain (FD) packet scheduler presented Power control Off
e.g. in [11]. We utilize Round Robin (RR) in the Time HARQ mode Asynchronous, with
Domain and Even Resources (ER) in the Frequency Domain. Chase combining
RR chooses users with longest time since last scheduling time HARQ max retransmissions 3
instant for FD-PS scheduling candidates. ER first sorts the ARQ Off
candidate users based on the buffering delay. Then, for each CQI measurement interval 5 ms
user in turn, the PRBs are sorted according to user experienced CQI reporting delay 2 ms
CQI and each user is allocated enough PRBs to be able to CQI reporting resolution 2 PRBs
transmit a VoIP packet, or more if the PS decides to bundle CQI error variance 1 dB
more than one packet. LA tries to maximize the spectral Initial MCS (LA off) QPSK 2/3
efficiency by choosing a best Modulation and Coding Set
Possible MCSs (LA on) QPSK 1/3, ½, 2/3
(MCS) for a scheduled user based on instantaneous radio
channel conditions. 16QAM ½, 2/3, 4/5
VoIP AMR 12.2 traffic model is modeled with both active
and silence periods. Packets are modeled to include Real-time 64QAM ½, 2/3, 4/5
Transport Protocol (RTP), Robust Header Compression LA Outer Loop LA
(ROHC), Packet Data Convergence Protocol (PDCP), RLC BLER target 0.2
and MAC headers in the total packet size. The VoIP traffic TD packet scheduler Round Robin
model parameters have been presented in TABLE III. FD packet scheduler Even Resources
TABLE IV shows the parameters varied in the simulations. Segmentation Off
Hard handover margin 3 dB
Hard handover sliding window size 200 ms

2504
 TABLE III. VOIP AMR 12.2 PARAMETERS.
LA provides about 44% to 78% gain over static MCS of
Parameter description Parameter value QPSK 2/3 depending on the 3GPP simulation case. This is
VoIP packet 38 bytes / 20 ms because with LA a VoIP packet might fit in fewer PRBs for
SID packet 14 bytes / 160 ms UEs with good radio conditions, thus more VoIP packets can
Voice Activity Factor 50 % be sent each TTI in average. On the other hand, UEs with bad
Call length Neg.exp. distr, mean 20 s radio channel conditions can utilize more robust MCS
Talk spurt Neg.exp. distr. mean 2 s improving BLER of the transmissions.
When the system bandwidth is decreased by a factor of four
TABLE IV. VARIED SIMULATION PARAMETERS. (i.e. case 4 with 1.25 MHz bandwidth) the VoIP capacity is
decreased by a factor of five. This is due to better packet
Parameter description Parameter values bundling gain with higher bandwidths. In 3GPP Case 4 LA
Simulation case 1, 2, 3, 4 provides less gain, because with 1.25 MHz bandwidth the
Delay threshold 40, 50, 60, 80, 100 ms system is not control channel limited and packet bundling does
Number of control channels 6, 8, 10 not provide any gain.
Packet bundling On, off
Link adaptation On, off B. Effect of number of control channels and packet
HARQ processes 7, 8, 9 bundling

IV. SIMULATION RESULTS
A. VoIP capacity in different 3GPP cases
The VoIP capacities in four different 3GPP cases are shown
in Figure 1. The capacity for Case 1 and Case 3 is about 300
UEs/cell with LA, showing that the larger ISD in Case 3 does
not lower the VoIP capacity. This indicates simply that the
capacity in Case 3 is limited by other factors than transmission
power and noise.
When the UE velocity is increased to 30 km/h in Case 2, the
VoIP capacity drops by about 42% with LA and by about 35%
without LA. There are three main factors contributing to this
capacity loss. First, the FD-PS performance is worse due to
less accurate CQI information – the PRB allocation becomes
more random. Second, the bad CQI affects also LA and less
optimal MCS is selected. Third, HO performance is slightly
worse with higher speed as the UE is connected to a non-
optimal cell more often. Note that the second point is valid
only with LA, which explains why the capacity loss without
LA is less than with LA.
With 1.25 MHz bandwidth (Case 4) the PDCCH capacity is
not limiting the VoIP capacity due to low traffic channel
capacity. However, with higher system bandwidths the
PDCCH capacity might become a limiting factor, at least if
dynamic scheduling is used.
According to Figure 2, with 5 MHz bandwidth and without
LA, the number of control channels clearly limits the VoIP
capacity without packet bundling. The capacity gain over 6
control channels is about 33% and 80% with 8 and 10 control
channels, respectively. On the other hand, with LA the gains
are 20% with 8 control channels and 21% with 10 control
channels. Smaller the PDCCH capacity, the more relative gain
we get from joint packet bundling and LA. With 6 control
channels the capacity gain with LA and packet bundling is
106%, with 8 control channels 86% and 10 control channels
only about 39%. In Figure 3 the PDU size distribution with
250 UEs per cell is shown. It can be seen that with 6 control
channels much more VoIP packets are bundled (PDU size is
2* 38 bytes = 76 bytes) than with 8 or 10 control channels.

Figure 2. Effect of PDCCH capacity, packet bundling

Figure 1. VoIP capacity in different 3GPP cases. and link adaptation on VoIP capacity.

2505
 C. Effect of delay bound
VoIP service is strictly delay critical and the radio interface
delay threshold is specified to be 50 ms in 3GPP. However, as
can be seen in Figure 4, the delay threshold has only a little
impact on the VoIP capacity. Only the 40 ms delay threshold
affects the VoIP capacity and with other delay thresholds the
effect is only visible after the capacity point in the UE
satisfaction curve. This is because the 95% satisfaction rate is
reached at a point where the unsatisfied users are unsatisfied
due to packet losses, so regardless of the delay bound, the
same users are unsatisfied.
Figure 3. L1 PDU size distribution with 250 UEs/cell.
Figure 4. Effect of different delay thresholds.
D. Effect of HARQ processes
The number of HARQ SAW channels for DL is being
defined at 3GPP. We simulated the VoIP capacity with 7-9
SAW channels and according to the results the number of
SAW channels does not seem to have any effect to the results.
This suggests that 7 SAW channel is already enough for VoIP,
as expected: the delay bound of 50 ms means that at most 2-3
packets should be waiting retransmission.
2506
V. CONCLUSION
We have presented the basic VoIP downlink capacity
results in different 3GPP simulation cases. Also, we have
studied the effect of multiple features on VoIP capacity, such
as the effect of delay threshold, packet bundling, control
channel capacity and number of HARQ processes on VoIP
capacity.
The main conclusions from the results are that
• VoIP downlink capacity is maximally about 60 UEs per
cell with 1.25 MHz system bandwidth and about 300
UEs per cell with 5 MHz.
• Link adaptation together with packet bundling provides
about 44-78% gain over the static MCS of QPSK 2/3
depending a little from the simulated case,
• In general the higher the system bandwidth the higher
the gain is from packet bundling and link adaptation,
• VoIP capacity is clearly control channel limited but
packet bundling can quite effectively compensate the
limitations.
Future work includes studying the VoIP capacity with
persistent scheduling algorithms and dynamic PDCCH. Also
more realistic mixed traffic scenarios are to be studied.
REFERENCES
[1] “Physical Layer Aspects for Evolved UTRA”, 3GPP Technical Report
25.814, version 7.1.0, September 2006.
[2] H. Ekström, A. Furuskär, J. Karlsson, M. Meyer, S. Parkvall, J. Torsner
and M. Wahlqvist, “Technical Solutions for the 3G Long-Term
Evolution”, IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 38-45,
March 2006.
[3] D. Jiang, H. Wang, E. Malkamäki and E. Tuomaala, ”Principle and
Performance of Semi-Persistent Scheduling for VoIP in LTE System”,
in Proceedings of the International Conference on Wireless
Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing (WiCom'07), pp.
2861-2864, September 2007.
[4] F. Persson, “Voice over IP Realized for the 3GPP Long Term
Evolution”, in Proceedings of the 66th IEEE Vehicular Technology
Conference (VTC’F07), September 2007.
[5] S. Choi, K. Jun, Y. Shin, S. Kang and B. Choi, “MAC Scheduling
Scheme for VoIP Traffic Service in 3G LTE”, in Proceedings of the 66th
IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC’F07), September 2007.
[6] "Requirements for Evolved UTRA (E-UTRA) and Evolved UTRAN (E-
UTRAN)", 3GPP Technical Report 25.813, version 7.3.0
[7] R1-070674 Orange, China Mobile, KPN, NTT DoCoMo, Sprint, T-
Mobile, Vodafone, Telecom Italia “Physical Layer Framework for
Performance Verification”
[8] “One Way Transmission time”, ITU-T recommendation G.114
[9] A. Pokhariyal, T. E. Kolding and P. E. Mogensen, “Performance of
Downlink Frequency Domain Packet Scheduling for the UTRAN Long
Term Evolution”, Proceedings of the 17th Annual IEEE International
Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications
(PIMRC’06), September 2006.
[10] K. Brueninghaus, D. Astely, T. Salzer, S. Visuri, A. Alexiou, S. Karger,
and G.-A. Seraji, “Link Performance Models for System Level
Simulations of Broadband Radio Access Systems,” in Proceedings of the
Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC’05), vol.
4, September 2005, pp. 2306–2311.
[11] P. Kela, J. Puttonen, N. Kolehmainen, T. Ristaniemi, T. Henttonen, and
M. Moisio, “Dynamic Packet Scheduling Performance in UTRA Long
Term Evolution Downlink,” in Proceedings of the International
Symposium on Wireless Pervasive Computing (ISWPC’08), May 2008,
to be published.