AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH This is a verified plain statement of truth I, ChuckA,Figueroa depose and say the following that I Chuck

A, Figueroa, herein Affiant became aware of a cause being filed to unlawfully seize his mothers property by Reginald Sharp and Yvonne Fisher that have no jurisdiction to do so, as Affiants mother was kidnapped by Reginald Sharp with assistance of Broken Arrow police and alleged Tulsa County Sheriffs deputy Pat Martin under arms over Affiant and Affiants mothers objections as Affiants mother tried to fend off the kidnappers violent seizure on or about October 8th 2011. Affiants mother was subsequently hidden where Affiant has not seen nor heard from his kidnapped mother since October 8th 2011 Roughly 2 weeks after the second kidnapping, the first one was on or about September 22nd 2011, the parties involved closed Wanda Figueroa's bank account stole her funds and are having her social security sent to them under their control without the authority to do so . On or about the first or second week of April Reginald Sharp and parties involved submitted fraudulent documents to Tulsa District court small claims court to steal Affiants and Affiants mothers property, when Affiant became aware of the attempt by viewing the courts website it appeared to affiant that Reginald Sharp with assistance from Yvonne Fisher and alleged Judge Millie Otey are making an unwarranted attack on plaintiffs mothers and plaintiffs property by unlawful administrative process. Affiant noticed alleged judge Millie Otey of affiants Legal Notice of Void Judgment and Ministerial Duty to Vacate Void Judgment and a Motion To vacate Void Judgment filed on or about the first week of April 2011.

Affiant exercising his rights to defend property has made demand on alleged judge Millie Otey to vacate the void judgment as shown in exhibit E. As set forth in defendants affidavit attached hereto,(exhibit Z) a hearing was held on April 27th 2011 on Affiants motion to vacate void judgment at which Reginald Sharp failed to prove personal jurisdiction over detainee Wanda Figueroa from inception as challenged by affiant Chuck,A, Figueroa, in fact, Reginald Sharp admitted in his own testimony at hearing held on April 27th 2011 that he never had jurisdiction in the first instance over Wanda Figueroa.

Wanda Figueroa was unlawfully seized and subsequently transported to an unknown location. All parties involved in this unlawful action have failed to produce material fact sufficient to prove personal jurisdiction over detainee Wanda Figueroa from the original inception as required by law and as requested in Affiant motion to vacate void judgment, void ab inition on the face of the record. The Plaintiffs response to Affiants motion to vacate Void judgment in it entirety constituted an alleged fraud upon the court in that both the titled response Plaintiffs response to Affiant Motion to Vacate judgment (see exhibit B) by design would omit the key word Void totally changing the entire legality of Affiants motion to the district court, and that plaintiffs response to Affiant motion never once even attempted to show proof of jurisdiction over the party/ies involved in the first instance as challenged by and demanded by Affiant and kept rambling on about irrelevant fraudulent and allegedly misleading statements, never submitting material fact to prove jurisdiction from inception as challenged and demanded by Affiant, demonstrating the total absence of jurisdiction that renders said judgment void on the face of the record .

Affiant has challenged jurisdiction of alleged case from the beginning and was never answered by alleged plaintiff, as if they were and are never required to prove jurisdiction when challenged as they fraudulently attempted to address the hearing as only a motion to vacate judgment, not a motion to vacate Void Judgment.[emphasis added] Alleged judge Millie Otey in an absolute and total refusal to perform ministerial duty failed to exercise its inherent power to vacate the void judgment. Alleged judge Millie Otey in violation of her ministerial duties and duties compelled by the cannon of ethics in regards to her office has allegedly flagrantly violated violated the laws when those laws absolutely require specific performance from the alleged judge Millie Otey to give the Affiant the relief sought. Alleged judge Millie Otey has a clear legal duty to act pursuant to her oath of office, the cannon of ethics in reporting unethical conduct of attorneys that occur in her court and in her presence.. alleged judge Millie Otey clearly observed the fraud upon the court in light of Alleged DHS counsel Yvonne fisher filing a deceptive fraudulent response Plaintiffs response to motion to vacate judgment allegedly designed to deceptively mitigate Affiants motion of vacate Void judgment to a non-void issue, allegedly in attempt to avoid the requirement to prove jurisdiction in the first instance, allegedly indicating that she is fully aware that alleged plaintiff never established jurisdiction in the first instance and was attempting to assist alleged plaintiff in continuing to unlawfully move forward in absence of jurisdiction and in violation of the law.[emphasis added] Alleged judge Millie Otey knew or should have known that she had a ministerial duty to comply with the uncontroverted facts of the record and act accordingly thereto as requested in Affiants motion tho vacate void judgment. The motion to vacate as void ncluded

precedent case law on standing on jurisdictional void (see memorandum in support/brief overview of law of voids exhibit D). Mandamus is now the only remedy available requiring alleged judge Millie Otey to vacate pursuant to her inherent power and compelling that function if the alleged judge Millie Otey fails to exercise that inherent power. The vacation of a void judgment that is void on its face as requested of the alleged judge Millie Otey is not a discretionary act in that the judgment is void on its face and requires the ministerial act of vacating the same if requested to by any party affected thereby .
1

On or about April 26th 2011, Affiant was attacked by alleged sheriffs deputies by gunpoint on Affiants property as sheriffs deputies broke down Affiants front door by sheriffs deputies battering ram and drew pistols to Affiants head screaming at Affiant to lay on the ground in Affiants living room in Affiants home screaming at Affiant that Affiant will be shot if Affiant didn't fall and lay on the ground, screaming at Affiant that this is a eviction that the property and house now belong to the DHS and forcefully at gunpoint drove Affiant from his home, off the family property, showing Affiant no warrant, no valid documentary papers or anything. This happened 1 day before Affiants hearing to vacate void judgment as there was a controversy involving said alleged case and alleged judge Millie Otey was duly noticed of void judgment prior to armed invasion. Alleged judge Millie Otey on or about the 18th of April 18th 2011 set an hearing for Affiants motion to vacate void judgment to be heard on the 27th of April 2011. Although alleged judge Millie Otey set hearing for Affiants motion to vacate void judgment for April 27th 2011, and there was an apparent controversy to be resolved, Tulsa County Sheriffs deputies were allegedly instructed to forcefully under arms invade Affiants home

and under arms forcefully eject Affiant from his home using deadly force if necessary, which in fact nearly resulted in the death of Affiant. Affiant has challenged jurisdiction from inception and the parties involved have refused to comply with Affiants lawful challenge and demand by refusing to issue/return writ of habeas corpus (on or about Nov 3rd 2010, exhibit H), refusing to respond to Affiants praecipes (Exhibits, P,Q,J,D), never responding to or refuting Affiants affidavits in support/Criminal Activity Report (Exhibits M, GL,U) , which now stand as fact. The record shows that although Affiant has constantly challenged jurisdiction no evidentiary hearing was ever held requiring the Reginald Sharp to appear to validate the unlawful seizure and restraint of Affiants mother Wanda Figueroa as Affiant has not seen or heard from his kidnapped mother since the second abduction on October 8 th 2010, (the first kidnapping that started the unlawful acts of the paeties involved was on or about September 22nd 2010) as Affiant fears that Affiants mother is in danger of life and limb as Affiant has evidence that alleged plaintiffs have been forcing dangerous drugs in Affiants mothers body and in fact Affiants mother may be already dead from plaintiffs unlawful actions. Plaintiff Reginald sharp admitted under oath when interrogated by Petitioner at motion to vacate void judgment hearing held on April 27th 2011, that plaintiff never established jurisdiction in the first instance over Wanda Figueroa on the face of the record. Affiant has a clear legal right and duty to request of the Alleged Judge Millie Otey to vacate the judgment as void. Alleged Judge Millie Otey has a clear legal duty in that both the law and her job required specific performance based on the face of the record. Affiant brought to the attention to Alleged Judge Millie Otey her ministerial duty to vacate the void judgment as it has been proven to be void on the face of the record as Reginald

Sharp has failed to prove jurisdiction in the first instance over affiants mother and hence her property and in fact that Reginald Sharp admitted under oath on his own testimony that he had no jurisdiction from the first instance over Wanda Figueroa and Alleged Judge Millie Otey defiantly decided, without authority to do so, to move forward any way unlawfully, totally and wholly without jurisdiction on the face of the record and trespass on the law and against affiant and affiants mother causing great injury and damage against affiant and affiants mother.

I, Chuck A,Figueroa certify on my own commercial liability that I have read the above affidavit and do know the contents to be true, correct and complete, and not misleading, the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, and do believe the above described acts to have been committed contrary to law. Signed __________________________ Chuck A,Figueroa C/o Notary Acceptor ________________________ Broken Arrow,Oklahoma, 74012 NOTARY